Ukraine will supply a tank to the USA 

138
The Ukrainian Malyshev Plant will export one tank Oplot to the USA, Ukrainian media reported, citing sources. The delivery will be carried out with the help of a state-owned special exporter, the Defense Industrial Courier reports, citing a representative of the Ukrainian arms business.

Ukraine will supply a tank to the USA




In Ukraine, they managed to call this supply promising. According to the Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technologies, which makes it possible for US-Ukrainian military-technical cooperation, which further implies the supply of Ukrainian technology to the United States

Military expert, editor-in-chief of the Arsenal of Fatherland magazine, Viktor Murakhovsky, in a comment for the newspaper VIEW, explained why the Ukrainian Malyshev Plant would export one tank, Oplot, to the USA.

Americans bought one tank in the same way as previous modifications of Soviet products bought one unit: one plane, one tank, one rocket. They need to disassemble the equipment, conduct tests, check the parameters of security, visibility in various ranges (radio electronic, optical, infrared) and so on.
- explained Murakhovsky.

Although the basis tank The Oplot is a well-known Soviet T-80, the Americans were interested in all its further modifications. In the same way, they bought, for example, the T-80UD tank and other units of armored vehicles, the expert noted.
138 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Imh
    +24
    28 February 2018 18: 58
    One single tank ... But as we all know, the river begins with a stream, and friendship begins with a smile.

    And anyway, we drink and smoke today, because we PURIM! Happy holiday to all!
    1. +16
      28 February 2018 19: 07
      And you do not get sick hi
    2. +44
      28 February 2018 19: 08
      Looking forward to the news that the U.S. Army has abandoned its Abrams in favor of the newest-not-having -... super Oplot tank?
      Not that in Ukraine all the Maidan people are understandable, but I had a better opinion of Israel. Snack tightly.
      1. Imh
        +15
        28 February 2018 19: 18
        How do you tag sarcasm? laughing
        1. +23
          28 February 2018 19: 23
          Quote: IMH
          How do you tag sarcasm? laughing

          On VO the principle of who marks is the one who takes care of himself Yes
          1. +18
            28 February 2018 19: 42
            Quote: Thrall

            On VO the principle of who marks is the one who takes care of himself Yes

            Rabinovich never cleaned up after himself.
            1. +5
              28 February 2018 19: 47
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Rabinovich never cleaned up after himself.

              That's why no one loves and respects him.
              1. +3
                28 February 2018 21: 24
                Quote: IMH
                How do you tag sarcasm? laughing

            2. +24
              28 February 2018 19: 55
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Rabinovich never cleaned up after himself.

              Therefore, Rabinovich himself is regularly removed, although he also regularly appears again under a new nickname and address.
              Rabinovich, come again! It’s so good without you then! laughing
            3. +1
              28 February 2018 19: 59
              Quote: Vasyan1971
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Rabinovich never cleaned up after himself.

              That's why no one loves and respects him.

              And sometimes they beat in the face and he licks behind him with his tongue. Watching how to approach the problem of pig Rabinovich, approach
            4. +4
              28 February 2018 20: 28
              Quote: Aron Zaavi
              Rabinovich never cleaned up after himself.

              today is not Shabbat Shalom recourse
          2. +4
            28 February 2018 20: 24
            Quote: Thrall
            On VO the principle of who marks is the one who takes care of himself

            Who was the last to rise from the table, to wash the dishes, I understand correctly, Comrade General?
            1. +4
              28 February 2018 23: 03
              Whoever rose last from the table, wash the dishes

              it seemed to me either "who first got up - that and slippers", or "who last - he and dad" laughing drinks
    3. +10
      28 February 2018 19: 10
      Quote: IMH
      One single tank ...

      DPRK and PRC also bought, but where is the further cooperation? I won’t be surprised if with this tank all technical documentation is also sent laughing
    4. +4
      28 February 2018 19: 27
      Quote: IMH
      One single tank ... But as we all know, the river begins with a stream, and friendship begins with a smile.

      And anyway, we drink and smoke today, because we PURIM! Happy holiday to all!

      You would just say that this is a breakthrough!
    5. +5
      28 February 2018 19: 44
      Quote: IMH
      All the holiday!

      Uh ... Thank you, of course, but I will refrain from having fun until our Easter. And yes, I congratulate you on your holiday.
    6. +3
      28 February 2018 19: 48
      This can only be in the imagination of the maydanut dill. Ukraine is arming the USA with its tanks laughing Americans make such purchases only for testing checks and measuring parameters no more. Happy holiday to you! ))))
      1. +4
        28 February 2018 20: 44
        Studying the ancient, powerful, and secret technologies of the Sumerians?
    7. +2
      28 February 2018 22: 17
      Quote: IMH
      But as we all know, the river begins with a stream, and friendship begins with a smile.

      Everything is simpler ... Tirex sebe left, Schaub was about.
    8. +2
      28 February 2018 22: 50
      ... and why is he all-colored plywood sewn up? ... or is it not plywood ... if so, then progress is however for Chubaty ...)))) by the way, Chubak from Star Wars is a flow of ancient hohlosumer. Right, I know!
  2. +6
    28 February 2018 18: 59
    the Yankees were clearly preoccupied with the creation of an automatic loader and a chassis ...
    1. Imh
      +8
      28 February 2018 19: 04
      Quote: Volka
      the Yankees were clearly preoccupied with the creation of an automatic loader and a chassis ...


      For this, Ukrainians do not need to buy anything
      1. +2
        28 February 2018 19: 20
        learn materiel advisor-general and count money ...
      2. +2
        28 February 2018 19: 21
        Merkava 4 appeared automatic loader copied from the t-55
        1. Imh
          +5
          28 February 2018 19: 24
          You can see the proofs, given that Merkva has no automatic loader laughing lol wassat
          1. 0
            28 February 2018 19: 27
            it was a question, a "?" flew off
          2. 0
            28 February 2018 20: 58
            Quote: IMH
            You can see the proofs, given that Merkva has no automatic loader laughing lol wassat


            Charging Russian-speaking. There is no conspiracy of the State Department.
        2. +1
          28 February 2018 22: 58
          Quote: Lance
          Merkava 4 appeared automatic loader

          there are no AZs on the Merkavas, not even on MK4. The machine implies the absence of a loader. He, as it were, remained in his place)
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +2
          1 March 2018 10: 48
          Quote: Lance
          Merkava 4 appeared automatic loader copied from the t-55

          the T-55 never had an automatic loader; it appeared on the T-64
          1. 0
            2 March 2018 04: 08
            five with a plus, but it was at 55 and appeared, moreover, a foot semiautomatic device
          2. 0
            2 March 2018 04: 18
            full revision on the t-55 M6
    2. 0
      28 February 2018 19: 18
      The Germans and the French have all this and in the best quality.
      1. +2
        28 February 2018 19: 23
        who gave you this, they have semiautomatic devices, and this is that crap
        1. +3
          1 March 2018 00: 06
          Quote: Lance
          BlackMokona Yesterday, 21:18 p.m. ↑
          The Germans and the French have all this and in the best quality.
          Blackmokona
          1 lance Yesterday, 21:23 p.m. ↑
          who gave you this, they have semiautomatic devices, and this is that crap

          the Germans do not have AZ, but the French have "Leclerc" - there)
          1. 0
            1 March 2018 02: 31
            Trump Mandulator ...!
          2. 0
            2 March 2018 04: 42
            the Germans have an automatic loader for the mvt-70 and for the leopard, but for the modernization of leo-2, an amount that is not allocated is required.
            1. 0
              2 March 2018 08: 44
              Quote: Lance
              the Germans have an automatic loader for the mvt-70 and for the leopard, but for the modernization of leo-2, an amount that is not allocated is required.

              ie on production cars no? What are we talking about. There can be a lot of things in the projects, even if they draw the "Death Star". Do you even talk about reality, or will we fantasize? Although, when you confuse an automatic machine and a semiautomatic device with such ease ... it says a lot
              1. 0
                2 March 2018 10: 02
                read the history of the automatic loader. the first French and Germans in metal, but .... you will find out why they were abandoned in the internet, you cannot call them full machines. as for the Omsk rifle with the t-55, you probably know where its follower is put.
                1. 0
                  2 March 2018 15: 11
                  Quote: Lance
                  read the history of the autoloader

                  advice given if asked
                  What matters is what stands on serial technique, and not what was or is in prototypes. Is there a AZ on German tanks? He is not here. Maybe there is an American? Also no. There’s nothing to talk about. The horns and guns of 140 mm experienced, what's next? Have they installed at least one production tank? Also no. Although, it will be with you, you will say that there are tanks with such guns
                  Quote: Lance
                  the Germans have an automatic loader on the mvt-70

                  Where is he, the very MVT-70? Maybe in the Bundeswehr? Blinded at all, I don’t see) So he stayed in the project, giving rise to Abrams and Leopard
                  1. 0
                    2 March 2018 17: 06
                    the question was whether there was an automaton or not. in all that is listed, it is including metal and tried and tested. the question of the advisability of installing on production tanks was not initially raised. further discussion is not interesting for me
                    1. 0
                      2 March 2018 20: 07
                      Quote: Lance
                      the question was was there a machine or not

                      in relation to serial technology. No one spoke about the prototypes (with the exception of you). At all. when they say something “is,” they mean precisely the presence on serial vehicles, and not some prototype there, from which the tankers are neither hot nor cold.
                      Quote: Lance
                      the question of the feasibility of installing on serial tanks was not initially raised

                      Naturally, I didn’t raise it, I don’t develop this topic, I didn’t even get into the discussion whether it was needed or not. Nobody spoke about this at all except you. I said which cars have AZs, which ones not. Do you sometimes read comments at all?
    3. +4
      28 February 2018 19: 45
      Quote: Volka
      the Yankees were clearly preoccupied with the creation of an automatic loader and a chassis ...

      There are definitely no abrams, but developments with an uninhabited tower will not bypass the machine. But the Ukrainian tank is not needed for this
    4. +2
      28 February 2018 22: 19
      Quote: Volka
      the Yankees were clearly preoccupied with the creation of an automatic loader and a chassis ...

      You argue politically ... there are too many beeches in your proposal ... you have to write, the Yankees are worried. Point. But what, the withdrawal of lice or sanctions no longer interests anyone.
    5. 0
      1 March 2018 02: 36
      laughing yes yes they joked well .. laughed straight to tears
  3. +2
    28 February 2018 18: 59
    overseas experts laugh heartily
    1. 0
      28 February 2018 19: 15
      In the distant 1993-1994, through the Mozambique, EMNIP, the states bought a batch of T-64BV. Platoon in my opinion and + one for the reserve. Not a single gripe and other questions arose. Both in terms of reliability and in terms of durability and other performance characteristics. After the purchase, the states stupidly sawed an upgrade of their working Pepelats. Purely beautiful and without cheating.
    2. +1
      1 March 2018 09: 23
      "overseas experts laugh heartily"
      What is this?
      as far as I know Oplot is a completely excellent tank, of course it cannot be compared with Armata, but it is many times better than our current modernized T-72.
      1. The comment was deleted.
  4. +7
    28 February 2018 19: 03
    Aha ha! laughing I’m neighing a magician! Yes, the only reason for the interest in the tank from the United States is the study of the technology of the Soviet tank construction, counting on confrontations with Russia.
    1. +2
      28 February 2018 20: 01
      in the light of previous articles on the VO about the lack of draft material for the US Army, they decided to replace the missing charging blacks with Soviet-style assault rifles laughing laughing
      1. +2
        28 February 2018 20: 28
        Quote: vadson
        in the light of previous articles on the VO about the lack of draft material for the US Army, they decided to replace the missing charging blacks with Soviet-style assault rifles laughing laughing

        McDonald's is to blame! Fast food is the cause of substandard blacks and non-blacks-loaders lol
        1. 0
          28 February 2018 21: 08
          Quote: Balu
          Quote: vadson
          in the light of previous articles on the VO about the lack of draft material for the US Army, they decided to replace the missing charging blacks with Soviet-style assault rifles laughing laughing

          McDonald's is to blame! Fast food is the cause of substandard blacks and non-blacks-loaders lol

          McDonald's under sanctions for undermining the defense of the United States))))
          it was easier to expand the autogenous hatch)))
  5. +2
    28 February 2018 19: 07
    > Although the basis of the Oplot tank is the well-known Soviet T-64

    What does the author carry?
    1. +2
      28 February 2018 19: 29
      Quote: Equalized
      > Although the basis of the Oplot tank is the well-known Soviet T-64
      What does the author carry?

      Journalists, what to take from them ... They even get into VIKI to break in.
  6. +9
    28 February 2018 19: 08
    To the museum, as we have in Kubinka.
    1. +6
      28 February 2018 19: 22
      Quote: ul_vitalii
      To the museum, as we have in Kubinka.

      you are too high opinion - kunst camera
      1. +8
        28 February 2018 19: 58
        It is believed that in the states and we have the largest tank museums in the world. hi
        1. +4
          28 February 2018 20: 04
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          the largest tank museums in the world.

          Well, you could say that
  7. 0
    28 February 2018 19: 11
    one plane, one tank, one rocket


    For the museum. To study, you do not need to buy anything .... and so will give.
  8. +3
    28 February 2018 19: 13
    Have you decided to change the Negro in the automatic loader?
  9. +1
    28 February 2018 19: 14
    Ukrainians will sell everything, even their mother’s mother, just to get green papers, and if we shit,
  10. +8
    28 February 2018 19: 15
    The Oplot is a fairly advanced tank for evaluating post-Soviet tank construction. For the United States, the norm is to purchase equipment for study. They already bought the T-84 (the predecessor of BM Oplot) to test dynamic protection and other details.

    BM Oplot is equipped with a panoramic sight with a wide view, an advanced transmission and a gearbox with reverse (reverse speed up to 35km / h), tank guided weapons and a bunch of other interesting things, which is why the United States bought one car for mileage. This is normal practice for Americans and it is not surprising that they do this.

    The amazing thing is that Ukraine gives so simply.
    1. 0
      28 February 2018 19: 25
      Then it’s easier to buy a T-80U and not bother with a stronghold
      1. +5
        28 February 2018 19: 27
        T-84 (aka T-80UD) has long been bought as I wrote in my comment. BM Oplot has differences from the base T-84 and therefore it is taken. T-80 There's nowhere to take, only the Russian Federation has them.

        By the way, the United States also purchased BTR-4 (GRAU "Crack" Index: D)
    2. +3
      28 February 2018 19: 26
      Quote: Equalized
      They already bought the T-84 (the predecessor of BM Oplot).

      I do not understand, 1984 came before 1964? belay
      1. +1
        28 February 2018 19: 28
        And where is 1964?
    3. +6
      28 February 2018 19: 26
      Quote: Equalized
      The amazing thing is that Ukraine gives so simply.

      And who will ask them? The country is under external control. They will also give it free of charge, in payment of interest.
    4. +1
      28 February 2018 19: 44
      Quote: Equalized
      The amazing thing is that Ukraine gives so simply.

      But what, a slave can object to the owner? stop The owner will say that they will do such a company and, like, will sell (in the sense of give) !!! What does not do one for their army, but for the owner please! hi
    5. +1
      28 February 2018 19: 51
      Not at all surprising since the ambassador is their most important ambassador.
    6. 0
      28 February 2018 19: 54
      Quote: Equalized
      The amazing thing is that Ukraine gives so simply.

      This is not surprising, because for Ukraine in relation to the United States this is - "normal practice."
      And by the way, how long have the "Americans" become "Americans"?
      Oh yes, the commentator from Georgia! Then everything is clear!
    7. 0
      28 February 2018 21: 19
      Why is UA "so easy to give"? The United States and Canada have already begun mass deliveries of weapons to it, Ukraine is not going to fight with them, and therefore it gives not only a tank, but continues to surrender in credit ecstasy.
    8. Alf
      +1
      28 February 2018 21: 31
      Quote: Equalized
      The amazing thing is that Ukraine gives so simply.

      This is not surprising at all, looking at the WHO sat at the head of the table during Biden's visit.
  11. +4
    28 February 2018 19: 15
    Did you cut the ribbons? Flags and balloons, even sang a hymn?
    1. +6
      28 February 2018 20: 03
      Nikolay, good evening hi The older brother paid attention, as if he had not become a red day on the calendar. smile
  12. +2
    28 February 2018 19: 31
    Well, you need to buy another Azovian for the kit! wassat
  13. +7
    28 February 2018 19: 36
    On the outskirts, they hope for cooperation ...! "I" collaborate "with my rabbits and other domestic animals about the same way! I feed them like the IMF, take care of their health, and then, when they grow up, our cooperation becomes more dense relations!
  14. 0
    28 February 2018 19: 36
    I did not understand: is it a zrad or overdrive?
  15. +4
    28 February 2018 19: 41
    They would have bought a maxim machine gun for study.
    1. +1
      28 February 2018 20: 03
      so this is their development)))
      1. +2
        1 March 2018 10: 15
        Well, actually yes request
  16. +2
    28 February 2018 20: 00
    Ukrainians are naive children, if they believe in this nonsense:
    According to Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technology, which gives the possibility of military-technical cooperation between the United States and Ukraine, which in the future implies the supply of Ukrainian equipment to the United States

    The tank will undergo a comprehensive analysis, first of all, weaknesses will be identified, a counteraction system will be developed, well, something can be stolen for themselves as an idea along the way. Ukrainians will not present to the Americans, but will be proud of the turnover.
    Well, in general, this tank will fall into all databases for anti-tank systems. It is not known where else and to whom, Ukraine will deliver these tanks
    1. +1
      28 February 2018 22: 13
      Quote: APASUS
      It is not known where else and to whom, Ukraine will deliver these tanks

      To nobody. I think there are no followers of Thailand)
      1. 0
        1 March 2018 17: 53
        Quote: Gregory_45
        To nobody. I think there are no followers of Thailand)

        There are Somalia, Yemen and a bunch of African countries. At the same time, the parameters are recorded in the memory of the ATGM precisely because the tanks may be on the wrong side.
        1. 0
          2 March 2018 08: 53
          Quote: APASUS
          Somalia, Yemen and a bunch of African countries

          they’ll buy used tanks of the T62 / T-72 type and act quite sensibly, since they don’t have money for the expensive Oplot, and there’s no one to fight with there
          1. 0
            2 March 2018 18: 37
            Quote: Gregory_45
            they’ll buy used tanks of the T62 / T-72 type and act quite sensibly, since they don’t have money for the expensive Oplot, and there’s no one to fight with there

            Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait will buy it and it’s not the fact that then they will be carried away by the wind into the desert and these tanks will not fight against American interests.
            1. 0
              2 March 2018 20: 13
              you have a pretty wild fantasy)
              1. 0
                3 March 2018 08: 39
                Quote: Gregory_45
                you have a pretty wild fantasy)

                I have nothing to fantasize about, just look at what the Pentagon generals say, when a load of American weapons dropped from planes fell into the hands of ISIS - it blew away! And according to this rule, a lot of things are happening in the world .................
  17. +1
    28 February 2018 20: 06
    if they will supply all in a single copy, is it when deliveries from promising turn into profitable?
  18. +2
    28 February 2018 20: 16
    Ukrainian "Malyshev Plant" will be exported to the USA one Tank "Hold".
    Well, now it’s sure that it will be.

    Interestingly, BM "Oplot" or T-84U "Oplot"? laughing
    1. +1
      28 February 2018 22: 12
      Quote: General of the Sand Quarries
      Interestingly, BM "Oplot" or T-84U "Oplot"

      presumably that BM "Oplot". Why do they need a T-80UD kit?
  19. +2
    28 February 2018 20: 23
    Naive people expect the United States to appreciate the high design idea of ​​the Ukrainians after this purchase, and decide to replace Abramsy with Oploty. It seems unclear why they are buying this tank.
    1. +6
      28 February 2018 21: 18
      Quote: Xscorpion
      Naive people expect

      Yes, not naive ones. They wrote correctly above: as the Boss said, so did the junta; no one explained anything to them, they just named the delivery nomenclature and date.
  20. +3
    28 February 2018 20: 34
    Ukrainians sold, sold shamefully. They simply gladly give for study to the opponents of Russia - the Americans everything that is interesting to them from a technical point of view, knowing that Russia has such a thing. Modern Ukraine is a shame and a traitor.
    1. +1
      28 February 2018 23: 47
      Quote: Borzikov
      They simply gladly give for study to the opponents of Russia - the Americans everything that is interesting to them in technical terms, knowing that Russia has such a thing

      So the United States is now the main ally of Ukraine. But the Russian Federation is an enemy. The action is logical. If the Russian Federation has Bastions then yes. But in Russia the Oplot was declared an unusable tank and PR T 90, which is not in Ukraine. Then why boil it?
      Someone arms two sides, someone arms one. The Russian Federation is also not handsome in the modern arms trade and the interests of the people.
      The main thing is to attract attention to Ukraine ... it is the personification of all the bad. RF all in white.
      1. +3
        1 March 2018 02: 05
        Quote: Antares
        . A RF enemy

        The whole piquancy of the situation is that Ukraine is not an enemy for the Russian Federation. What was repeatedly announced at the highest level. Also, no one called the Kharkov tanks sucks .., usually it was the manufacturer himself, but he deserved it .. disruption of contracts. And the third .., T-90 in PR
        doesn’t need .. this technique has successfully proved its capabilities in competitive tests, and lately in a real war .. The result is new .. new contracts.
        1. 0
          1 March 2018 12: 17
          Quote: dvina71
          The whole piquancy of the situation is that Ukraine is not an enemy for the Russian Federation. What was repeatedly announced at the highest level.

          by the way true, but in part. On the one hand, all friendship treaties are valid. Laws on the aggressor and occupation are also in force.
          Maybe "friendly enemy" or "enemy friend" laughing
          Quote: dvina71
          Also, no one called Kharkov tanks sucks

          mmm .. saw repeatedly. There is also a “Tagil baron” (a copy of our Andrei, even more moved by T 90) .. and patriots also have enough cheers.
          Oh yes, there are still a lot of "experts" who wrote with errors that he was almost 64 ...
          Enough of that.
          T-90 in PR

          every sandpiper has its own swamp. This is a competition. And the tricks are different. T 90 for participation I can compare with Leo among the Turks. That is a good but also killed tank.
          Contracts are good. The UVZ production line copes with the load.
          1. +1
            1 March 2018 13: 23
            Quote: Antares
            Maybe "friendly enemy" or "enemy friend"

            You ... in the sense of Ukraine ... more clearly .. (do not be offended that I write with a little .. this applies only to your government) with whom it is fighting, who has occupied it .. The Russian Federation does not wage wars, it lays its borders solely on the basis of international laws.
            Quote: Antares
            Enough of that.

            Since when have the opinions of couch experts become important? Of the serious specialists, no one called the products of Kharkiv bad .. In fact, these are Soviet tanks, one school .. It’s a pity that you stole it all to please the West.
            Quote: Antares
            T 90 for participation I can compare with Leo among the Turks.

            And I can’t .. Leo’s losses are simply beyond the limit, comparable to the M60 .. the tank of the post-war generation .. The T-90 proved to be very resistant to impact and good firepower in combat conditions, in very difficult natural conditions .. which led to a significant part of the Abrams of Iraq in disrepair.
  21. +1
    28 February 2018 20: 48
    Ukrainian "Malyshev Plant" will supply one Oplot tank for export to the USA

    Shame !! The owner said - immediately completed.
  22. +1
    28 February 2018 20: 48
    In Ukraine, they managed to call this supply promising. According to Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technology, which gives the possibility of military-technical cooperation between the United States and Ukraine, which in the future implies the supply of Ukrainian equipment to the United States.
    Something tells me that Ukrainians are beginning to believe in any nonsense that rushes from all sides.
    There is completely no criticality to what is heard.
    Maidan is valid? And progressing?
    1. 0
      1 March 2018 00: 13
      Quote: demo
      In Ukraine, they managed to call this supply promising. According to the Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technologies, which makes it possible for US-Ukrainian military-technical cooperation, which further implies the supply of Ukrainian technology to the United States

      If I give news to VO, which seems to be from the original source, but with my own speculations and conclusions, this is sad.
      In Ukraine, they managed to call this supply promising. According to the Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technologies, which makes it possible for US-Ukrainian military-technical cooperation, which further implies the supply of Ukrainian technology to the United States

      This does not correspond to the original source. It is called a gag. And you build conclusions on it. And such a "gag" in almost every news about Ukraine. Apparently with the aim of forming an opinion.
      We go to the source site
      http://opk.com.ua
      Read
      As a representative of the Ukrainian Defense News Agency he was a representative of the Ukrainian zbroynoy business, the delivery will be recognized through a state-owned special exporter company.
      The “OPK” salesman is looking forward to such a promising delivery, fragments, for the sake of words, to talk about the American side of Ukrainian technologies and the global high-tech technological solution from Ukraine.

      Even translation is not required because in the article the first part is translated. The representative of the arms business himself told about the deal, himself and told his opinion about the benefits. Where are the experts here, where is the country then ... the ordinary huckster has sold something and considers the profit.
      By the way, on other resources, the news was correctly translated and voiced. There are no "experts" and "In Ukraine called profitable" no. The representative of the arms business and all.
      Something tells me that Ukrainians are beginning to believe in any nonsense that rushes from all sides.
      There is completely no criticality to what is heard.
      Maidan is valid? And progressing?

      it’s sad if your opinion is formed just for that.
  23. +2
    28 February 2018 21: 11
    Gentlemen, you would not giggle about the "stupid" Ukrainians, but think about why the military is so actively studying in the United States all the equipment similar to Russian. No matter how soon you cry, you don't have to scratch the back of your head, such as what the adversaries have!
    Yes, it’s time to understand that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are rapidly strengthening, rearming and will be able to simply crush the defense of the DLNR in the day and hour. Then it will be too late to appeal to Kiev’s implementation of the Minsk agreements. Lost return to the status quo will no longer be possible.
    1. +5
      28 February 2018 22: 12
      Quote: gerkost2012
      .... and they will be able to simply crush the defense of the DLNR in X day and hour ....


      And stop only after taking Vladivostok!););)
      1. 0
        1 March 2018 00: 37
        How to know. After all, on June 21, 1941 no one knew, did not know what would happen
        run away from the border to Moscow and Stalingrad. So, gee-gee should be left to the kids, and adults to think.
        1. +4
          1 March 2018 07: 25
          Those. do you confirm the thesis that Nazi Germany and Bandera Ukraine have something in common ???
      2. +1
        1 March 2018 02: 33
        Here Vladivostok is not necessary to touch.
    2. 0
      28 February 2018 22: 23
      ponder why the military is so active in the US
      Find more and more new sources of income! Taburetkin nervously smokes on the sidelines.
  24. 0
    28 February 2018 21: 20
    The next article on this topic will be approximately as follows: "At such a range, the Oplot is shot at from all available types of anti-tank weapons." Otherwise, I do not understand anything.
  25. +2
    28 February 2018 21: 43
    weak-minded ... They are glad that they are selling equipment for studying and drawing up the principles of counteraction ...
  26. BAI
    0
    28 February 2018 21: 49
    Well, what kind of noise? What States can not buy a tank for a museum?
  27. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 02
    Tse zrada or tse peremoga ??)
  28. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 06
    In the Armed Forces of Ukraine soon one tank will become smaller) This is good news)
  29. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 07
    Now they can loudly declare that even the United States is buying their armored vehicles!))
    1. 0
      28 February 2018 23: 55
      Quote: FalconD
      Now they can loudly declare that even the United States is buying their armored vehicles!

      yeah, they might as well say that Americans fly Ukrainian helicopters) There will be as much laughter)
  30. +1
    28 February 2018 22: 15
    Elon Musk probably ordered ... he wants to put into orbit;););)
  31. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 20
    The Americans bought one tank in the same way as previous modifications of Soviet products bought one unit: one plane, one tank, one rocket
    ... one strategist, one SSBN ... Oh. yo ... Have they not bought a used kirzachi with footcloths yet?
  32. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 21
    1 tank for collection. But why do the dillies with dillies for the dillies? Naive as children ....
    1. 0
      28 February 2018 23: 53
      Quote: Baby sitter
      But why do the dillies with dillies for the dillies? Naive as children

      they are not children. Everything is very logical. They study where tank building is moving in the post-Soviet space. Ours would also ride with great pleasure and disassemble to study the “Leclerc”, “Leopard” of the latest modifications or “Puma” with “Boxer”
  33. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 33
    That's the car
  34. 0
    28 February 2018 22: 46
    US military-industrial complex kirdyk.
  35. +2
    28 February 2018 23: 13
    Normal, let them start from 6td what
  36. 0
    28 February 2018 23: 37
    is it really that the yankers lack a rusty engine ??? Hmmm
  37. 0
    28 February 2018 23: 51
    yes, present Ukraine is ready for anything
  38. 0
    1 March 2018 03: 16
    You need to find all the strengths and weaknesses in order to burn it was more convenient ..
  39. +1
    1 March 2018 04: 12
    One tank per country. A good party will turn out. The idiocy of the rolls over
  40. 0
    1 March 2018 04: 44
    ready to give everything, sell, just give a loan !!!
  41. +1
    1 March 2018 05: 07
    Ukraine sold a tank ... That says it all, why comment?
    1. 0
      1 March 2018 06: 44
      Of course, everyone realized that the tank will be dismantled to the cog and enlighten everything down to the tracks
  42. +1
    1 March 2018 05: 23
    Well, okay ! Ukrainians sell everything as well as conscience!
  43. 0
    1 March 2018 06: 35
    time does not stand, the Yankees urgently need a new revolutionary, but a European tank, because In terms of mass and size, the Abrams clearly do not hang around Europe, but the Yankees do not have their own tank building school, that’s all, that's why they are trying to follow the Chinese path - copy ...
    1. +1
      1 March 2018 06: 38
      Quote: Volka
      but the Yankees do not have their own tank building school, that's all, because they are trying to follow the Chinese path - copy ...

      I haven’t laughed like that for a long time ... has spring begun?
      1. +1
        1 March 2018 09: 17
        How is it that Amers do not have their own tank building school?))))
        What are you talking about?)))))
        Ahahahaha, well, at least the mood in the morning was raised by this post)))
  44. 0
    1 March 2018 06: 36
    Peremoga! USA changes Abramsy to Bastions!
  45. 0
    1 March 2018 06: 51
    Quote: IMH
    One single tank ... But as we all know, the river begins with a stream, and friendship begins with a smile. And in general, we drink and smoke today, because we PURIM! Happy holiday to all!

    This is when your ancestors slaughtered 75000 Rus?
  46. 0
    1 March 2018 07: 28
    Ukrainian news for the Ukrainian layman ... The stronghold is the last breath of the Ukrainian defense industry. The Americans will disassemble their tank for details, they will introduce everything new from Oplot into their tanks, after which no one will buy Opole or any other Ukrainian tanks. Murakhovsky is right because he knows history and does not believe in fairy tales.
  47. 0
    1 March 2018 08: 22
    ... and production technology, in addition, if not already there. So, with a “silent glanders” and deceit, the “partners” rob the whole world, and then they spin the rest of their heads about their own perfection over the others, the advantage of “democracy”, which supposedly takes place in the USA and the superiority of its technologies over others. Obviously, you have to witness the end of this "dead end" strategy. True, they themselves are unlikely to see clearly - they will have to help.
  48. 0
    1 March 2018 08: 45
    For the target chtoli stronghold?
  49. 0
    1 March 2018 09: 14
    Ohhh, a whole tank!
    Nifiga myself, well, straight peremoga))))
    In Petro swells with happiness)))
    Wait on Monday for new announcements, such as Ukrainians and Omerika brothers for a century)))
  50. 0
    1 March 2018 10: 02
    According to Ukrainian "experts", the American side is thus studying Ukrainian technology)))
    In-in, it is better to learn how to wet such tanks. Fat is not enough.
  51. 0
    1 March 2018 12: 38
    Probably they squeezed out of the Thai party! :)
  52. 0
    1 March 2018 16: 23
    Bought as an exhibit for the museum of military misunderstandings! When they want to test something, they need at least two copies! One for the test, the other for the standard......................
  53. 0
    2 March 2018 10: 47
    Everyone has long understood the manipulation. It's good that it's a T-80, and not something newer.