Military Review

In the US, explained why they spent two billion dollars in Ukraine

37
US Deputy Secretary of State John Sullivan said that Washington had invested more than two billion dollars in the "success" of Kiev. He stated this during a speech at the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry Academy, according to the Facebook page of the US Embassy in Kiev.


The diplomat claims that "a successful Ukraine is one of the greatest fears" of Russia.

In the US, explained why they spent two billion dollars in Ukraine


The United States invested in the success of Ukraine, helping more than two billion dollars to achieve this goal.
- noted Sullivan.

According to him, Washington supports Kiev due to the fact that Ukraine has a large untapped "potential."

Earlier, US President Donald Trump signed the country's defense budget for the 2018 fiscal year, among other things providing military assistance to Ukraine in the amount of 350 million dollars, half of this amount can be provided only as a result of reforms in the military sphere, RIA reports News
Photos used:
https://ua.usembassy.gov/uk/
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexander War
    Alexander War 22 February 2018 15: 20
    +4
    US Assistant Secretary of State John Sullivan said that Washington has invested more than two billion dollars in Kiev’s “success." John Sullivan admitted that he has invested in the coup, poverty, civil war and corruption!
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 22 February 2018 15: 24
      +2
      It’s not a pity for the mattresses to annoy Russia, that’s the case with Ukraine.
      1. Alexander War
        Alexander War 22 February 2018 15: 30
        0
        A bunch of examples!
      2. 210ox
        210ox 22 February 2018 15: 32
        +2
        The most interesting thing is that they invested in "success" .... And? Is it there?
        Quote: Giant thought
        It’s not a pity for the mattresses to annoy Russia, that’s the case with Ukraine.
        1. ZAV69
          ZAV69 22 February 2018 19: 18
          0
          But what about how many losses from broken ties ..... Three frigates without engines, planes without engines, Crimea without water .... Yes, there’s so much that is just horror.
          1. Dimmedroll
            Dimmedroll 23 February 2018 18: 10
            0
            Well here we are to blame, we saved. And they behaved carelessly and got it.
      3. Vitaly Anisimov
        Vitaly Anisimov 22 February 2018 15: 37
        +3
        Quote: Giant thought
        It’s not a pity for the mattresses to annoy Russia, that’s the case with Ukraine.

        Yes, I would not say ... They put two raised ten and more! And if not for the Maidan, they would have enriched and salted Russia even more! Now everything is clear with Ukraine, how and why, and what to do with it in the future .. we’ll take Kiev!
      4. You Vlad
        You Vlad 22 February 2018 17: 29
        +1
        Quote: Thought Giant
        It’s not a pity for the mattresses to annoy Russia, that’s the case with Ukraine.

        Yes, they are on our success $ 18 billion did not regret! Now successful people are already mastering laughing The question is which of us will become more successful! yes Russia or Ukraine?
      5. Pete mitchell
        Pete mitchell 22 February 2018 17: 38
        +6
        Quote: Thought Giant
        just to annoy Russia, that’s the case with Ukraine to this confirmation.

        I look at this "theater of the absurd" and sometimes it seems to me that those who give grandmothers and those who take: they saw grandmothers together, stupidly sawed: designated goals they are not particularly interested in
    2. dm_Russia
      dm_Russia 22 February 2018 15: 31
      +2
      Nifiga, they created a “successful” Ukraine. 404
      Successful current -2m from the surface level.
      1. Alexander War
        Alexander War 22 February 2018 15: 33
        +2
        The collapse of the camps, the impoverishment of the population, corruption and civil war, for them it is a success!
        1. SRC P-15
          SRC P-15 22 February 2018 15: 40
          +2
          US Under Secretary of State John Sullivan said that Washington has invested more than two billion dollars in the "success" of Kiev.

          Interestingly, how many billion dollars did Washington invest in Russian opposition liberals? It seems no less than in Kiev, because the more Washington dumps the dough, the worse the result.
          1. assa67
            assa67 22 February 2018 18: 42
            +3
            Alexander hi poured much more, and pour in ... but they don’t consider interfering in our elections ...... democracy
        2. Lelek
          Lelek 23 February 2018 01: 45
          0
          Quote: Alexander War
          for them it is a success!

          hi
          Interestingly, the Germans were offended by the US shoulder, which squeezed them and France as "guarantors" in the Ukrainian mess, and declared an ultimatum to Kiev - "Minsk agreements will not be respected - there will be no money." What is it? Have you decided to indicate your influence on the “walk-field” or have you seriously imprisoned to punish the “disobedient”?
  2. Incvizitor
    Incvizitor 22 February 2018 15: 25
    +3
    Ukraine will never be successful without Russia, and indeed it will not exist at all after the coup, everything has collapsed.
    1. Kasym
      Kasym 22 February 2018 16: 18
      +3
      This is natural, because the economy "independent" is tied from the time of the Union to ours. Europe, apart from the market, does not need anything from its economic potential. Well, maybe something is needed for V.Europe. That coal, for example, which mostly remained in the Donbass.
      Former Prime Minister Azarov claims that Kiev over the past 4g. assistance was provided in 30 billion. currency. And something is not visible for Kiev to do useful for its economy - hence it has been plundered. Moreover, imports increased significantly ... We arrived ... Kiev is left to again ask for loans that will not give. They will start to fight and throw a tantrum when they get it from the militia on the head.
      I think that Berlin and Paris will no longer support Kiev. Here are the internal problems of the EU, and the policy of Trump, and the attitude of the EU’s neighbors in Kiev. The EU’s hysteria, due to the “aggressive” RF, has played a cruel joke - the USA is demanding to increase the budgets of the Euroarmonies - and they need it, there are not enough refugees and subsidies for V. Europe ?! The EU has also come to a standstill.
      The Russian Federation and the EAEU do not need such Ukraine for nothing - it remains to protect the Donbass from these Bandera and wait for the provocations of the Kiev authorities. hi
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 February 2018 15: 26
    +5
    This is in addition to those 5 for which they "bought" Crimea to Russia. They even guessed that the trough called Ukraine has no bottom wassat
  4. Prisoner
    Prisoner 22 February 2018 15: 26
    +2
    It turns out that jumpers themselves are not needed. It’s not very successful for the pins, which are the main thing for them to scare Russia with dos, themselves. lol Trying to scare a hedgehog with a naked booty, it’s only amers can think of. laughing
  5. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 22 February 2018 15: 29
    +3
    The diplomat claims that "a successful Ukraine is one of the greatest fears" of Russia.

    The United States spent 2 lard on the collapse of Ukraine, so that its success did not scare us. What virtues, however. Just shy just say lol
  6. Herculesic
    Herculesic 22 February 2018 15: 29
    +1
    Why did you spend it, of course! He would have clearly explained what exactly this money was spent for, for there are no results, ukroin stone goes to its dark future.
  7. flicker
    flicker 22 February 2018 15: 30
    +3
    US Under Secretary of State John Sullivan says Washington has invested more than $ XNUMX billion in Kiev’s “success”
    He boasts of it, but for Ukraine it’s not money, they just grunt at times. Give them a license to print dollars, in a couple of months it’s not like Russia, all of America will envy Ukraine.
  8. demo
    demo 22 February 2018 15: 31
    +3
    The United States invested in the success of Ukraine, helping more than two billion dollars to achieve this goal.
    - noted Sullivan.
    According to him, Washington supports Kiev due to the fact that Ukraine has a large untapped "potential."
    Earlier, U.S. President Donald Trump signed the country's defense budget for the fiscal year 2018, among other things, providing for the allocation of military assistance to Ukraine in the amount of $ 350 million, half of this amount can be provided only by the results of reforms in the military sphere, RIA Novosti reports.

    Yes, the Americans.
    For beads and a cap of crackers, you managed to buy local kings and gorlopans.
    And we put the grub on 200 billion and everything down the drain.
    I acknowledge your skill.
    1. Kot_Kuzya
      Kot_Kuzya 23 February 2018 00: 45
      +2
      Russians also need to act like Americans and buy the top, rather than trying to appease the entire population. You will not please everyone, on the contrary, accustomed to freebies and gas they write, this population will despise, hate and curse the helping side. The USSR also made the same mistake. When the next banana republic in Africa and Asia declared its course on socialism, hoping to get money from the USSR, the Russians came and began to build hospitals, schools, universities, roads, power plants in this country, and their kings turned their fingers at their temple, they just it was necessary from the USSR money for a harem, a palace and a white limousine.
  9. BARKHAN
    BARKHAN 22 February 2018 15: 31
    +6
    Just that the fight with Bandera “Dmitry Suvorov” even the patient presenter Norkin rushed to beat the banderlog face ... How much can you turn Bandera on federal channels? Do the bosses of these channels have any sense of dignity?
    1. Sewer krainiy
      Sewer krainiy 22 February 2018 16: 19
      +3
      [quote = BARKHAN] Just that the fight with Bandera’s Dmitry Suvorov even the patient presenter Norkin rushed to beat Banderlog’s face ... How many can you turn Bandera’s on federal channels? Do the authorities of these channels have any sense of self-esteem? [/ Quote]
      I don’t watch these talk shows anymore ... Yesterday I watched the Ukrainian format show on the Ukrainian NewsOne channel. There are no Ukrainian clowns of Russian talk shows, there are real banderlogs ... there are real Ukrainians, opposing banderlogs. There is something to see, listen to, analyze, think about. I liked inviting Russian TV channels of clowns from Ukraine to something, like all of Ukraine was behind them ... Is it beneficial for someone ???
      1. LASVEGAS
        LASVEGAS 22 February 2018 18: 18
        +1
        The rating is above all :) Periodically, when I “flip through” channels during advertising, I get on these shows - they have the same faces as they go to work. And someone is watching them, listening?!?
  10. Metallurg_2
    Metallurg_2 22 February 2018 15: 36
    +1
    And shaw, did Ukraine become successful from this infusion?
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 22 February 2018 17: 35
      +2
      Pouring the wrong throat! There is one insatiable and bottomless there !!!
  11. Strashila
    Strashila 22 February 2018 15: 38
    +3
    To those five with cookies ... a total of seven lard ... yes that kind of money, but in sensible hands ... yeah, how many foolish candy wrappers and shag would you give ... he won’t be smarter.
  12. citlstar
    citlstar 22 February 2018 15: 40
    +1
    From successful americosia, our pants began to dry up, so they want to come up with a new horror story for Russia.
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 22 February 2018 17: 33
      +2
      I don’t know who’s got their panties locked, can we keep back from uncontrolled rzhach who ??? That's all for horror stories NO! But the thing about mixers!
  13. Sands Careers General
    Sands Careers General 22 February 2018 15: 49
    +3
    The diplomat claims that "a successful Ukraine is one of the greatest fears" of Russia.


    Until 2014, Ukraine was even more or less successful. Who was afraid of her? And now the nationalist outskirts are a vicious and impoverished country that poses a threat to Russia.

    The meaning of the statements of these "diplomats" must be understood exactly the opposite.
  14. rocket757
    rocket757 22 February 2018 17: 30
    +1
    It's cool, then we never see fear at all!
    Yankees, do not think at all that they say something ??? The quality of the political, leadership team of the Yankees rolls over, only minus seems. In a simple way, in our opinion - what kind of de-deb-deb-dei is it!
  15. alex3075
    alex3075 22 February 2018 23: 18
    +2
    The United States invested 2 billion, and the main profit was received by the Russian Federation. How interesting is the peninsula? Next in line is the Donbass. The main people of Crimea are satisfied. Donbass will be pleased too. Successful Ukraine has lost so much of its territory because of your investments.
  16. Weyland
    Weyland 23 February 2018 00: 04
    +2
    “successful Ukraine is one of Russia’s greatest fears.”

    And what, such somewhere exists - in a parallel world, one must assume? laughing
  17. earloop
    earloop 23 February 2018 01: 06
    0
    Naive guy, John!
  18. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim 23 February 2018 01: 36
    0
    And Klimkin explained why Ukrainians are learning Polish: at 5:54 "