Military Review

Russian Armed Forces will adopt the latest Drill aerial bomb in 2018

78
The newest planning bomb "Drill" will be put into service in 2018, reports RIA news With reference to the general director of the concern "Techmash" Vladimir Lepin.


State tests of planning cassette caliber 500 kilograms began in the year 2016. Tests are carried out according to the program of the customer, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. After their successful completion in 2018, the product is planned to be adopted
- told the head of "Tehmash"

Russian Armed Forces will adopt the latest Drill aerial bomb in 2018


The PBC-500U SPBE-K unified planning bomb cassette (Drill) with the possibility of round-the-clock all-weather use (without the aircraft entering the zone of coverage of air defense objects) is intended to engage armored vehicles, ground-based radar stations and command and control centers.

The dropped bomb can plan up to 30 kilometers, adjusting the flight using GPS and GLONASS signals. Above the target, the three-meter “Drill” breaks up into 15 self-aiming combat elements. One bomb will silence an artillery or rocket battery, stop the convoy tanks, will disable the large radar and anti-aircraft missile system. The ammunition is equipped with a complex of protection against air defense and electronic warfare - to detect a flying bomb with a radar, and even more so to shoot down it is almost impossible. Abroad, nothing like the "Drill" is not.

NPO Basalt is a leading developer and manufacturer of bombs, automatic and naval anti-sabotage grenade launchers, hand grenades and artillery ammunition. In particular, shells for the Su-57 cannon created here successfully passed the state acceptance. Tests of new shells for attack helicopters Mi-28 and Ka-52 will be completed soon. The main division of "Basalt" is located in Moscow, the branches of NGOs are located in the Moscow region, Kostroma region and Tula, reports RG-Sil
Photos used:
Sergey Ptichkin / RG
78 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Imh
    Imh 20 February 2018 16: 49
    +17
    Precision weapons are good. Precision weapons are exactly what the Russian Aerospace Forces lack. We need more of these weapons so as not to endanger the lives of the pilots (Hero Filipov's example).
    1. poquello
      poquello 20 February 2018 16: 56
      +1
      Quote: IMH
      Precision weapons are good. Precision weapons are exactly what the Russian Aerospace Forces lack. We need more of these weapons so as not to endanger the lives of the pilots (Hero Filipov's example).

      the danger depends more on the rudeness of the warring parties and other parties
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 20 February 2018 16: 59
        +7
        Quote: IMH
        Precision weapons are good.
        Quote: poquello
        the danger depends more on the rudeness of the warring parties and other parties
        - Yes, I went to the university ...
      2. Imh
        Imh 20 February 2018 17: 00
        +18
        Yes and no. In Syria, with the airborne forces, the probability of getting from a third-rate MANPADS is higher than getting from normal air defense. From this it follows that flying at a distance of 20-30 km from the target of the attack is a guarantee of safety for the airborne forces, since these are unattainable distances for MANPADS, and what is more serious with ISIS-SHMIGIL is not and is not expected.
        1. poquello
          poquello 20 February 2018 17: 03
          0
          Quote: IMH
          Yes and no. In Syria, with the airborne forces, the probability of getting from a third-rate MANPADS is higher than getting from normal air defense. From this it follows that flying at a distance of 20-30 km from the target of the attack is a guarantee of safety for the airborne forces, since these are unattainable distances for MANPADS, and what is more serious with ISIS-SHMIGIL is not and is not expected.

          those when the Lebanese need to bomb your fly away for Israel?
          1. Imh
            Imh 20 February 2018 17: 09
            +23
            Of course, I understand that the Superpower Israel is the Center of the World and the climax of your attention. I understand that without writing about Israel in every first news you will not fall asleep. I realize that Israel occupies your mind and soul, but nevertheless I want to ask, to the news about the Russian bomb, what does Israel have to do with it?
            1. poquello
              poquello 20 February 2018 17: 12
              0
              Quote: IMH
              what does Israel have to do with it?

              Why do you just like the flag? or like a hare "me and not me"?
              1. Imh
                Imh 20 February 2018 17: 15
                +9
                Let's assume that I am from the USA. Attention is the question - what would the linking of blacks in the USA be related to the discussion, for example, of the collapse of the Ukrainian economy? It is the same.
                1. poquello
                  poquello 20 February 2018 17: 21
                  0
                  Quote: IMH
                  Let's assume that I am from the USA.

                  then the tactics of the United States would be compared with the thesis
        2. 210ox
          210ox 20 February 2018 18: 01
          0
          Try to read in our academy, you can even two. Long ago there were no God's chosen ones.
          Quote: IMH
          Yes and no. In Syria, with the airborne forces, the probability of getting from a third-rate MANPADS is higher than getting from normal air defense. From this it follows that flying at a distance of 20-30 km from the target of the attack is a guarantee of safety for the airborne forces, since these are unattainable distances for MANPADS, and what is more serious with ISIS-SHMIGIL is not and is not expected.
          1. Imh
            Imh 20 February 2018 18: 02
            0
            Are you inviting? I'll think about it.
            1. Guillon
              Guillon 21 February 2018 12: 29
              0
              You already decide on the flag! wassat
        3. Maz
          Maz 20 February 2018 20: 48
          0
          Israel is doing the same, bullets from behind the neighbor. Why are we worse?
  2. cniza
    cniza 20 February 2018 16: 52
    +5
    Above the target, the three-meter “Drill” breaks up into 15 self-aiming combat elements.


    Something a lot of data posted in the public domain, not a lot of strange.
    1. Imh
      Imh 20 February 2018 17: 01
      +2
      What is the secret?
    2. DarkMatter
      DarkMatter 20 February 2018 17: 02
      +2
      A lot is not enough wassat
      1. Separ
        Separ 20 February 2018 18: 41
        +3
        Back in the 80s, RBCs were hung on the MiG-27, used in exercises for the destruction of tank columns, the opening of the runway
  3. Imh
    Imh 20 February 2018 16: 53
    +9
    But the phrase as "has no analogues in the world" has traditionally smiled. An interesting article about new weapons, but this phrase! laughing wassat
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 20 February 2018 17: 01
      +4
      Well, you name the analogue. Do not be shy.
      1. Imh
        Imh 20 February 2018 17: 11
        +2
        So they wrote that "has no analogs." How will I write you an analogue if there is none?
      2. poquello
        poquello 20 February 2018 17: 22
        0
        Quote: Muvka
        Well, you name the analogue. Do not be shy.

        and this .., sdb II?
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 20 February 2018 17: 51
          +3
          Quote: poquello
          sdb II

          Umm. Are you not drunk? Compare a landmine of 100 kg and a cluster bomb of 500 kg? Seriously? An analog? And what about the fight against air defense? EW too?
          1. poquello
            poquello 20 February 2018 18: 51
            0
            Quote: Muvka
            Quote: poquello
            sdb II

            Umm. Are you not drunk? Compare a landmine of 100 kg and a cluster bomb of 500 kg? Seriously? An analog? And what about the fight against air defense? EW too?

            Duc plans, and Maxifugas there or a microcassette bomb who will take them apart
          2. just exp
            just exp 20 February 2018 19: 04
            +3
            tell us dark please. But how is a bomb that does not have engines for maneuvers, which has no missile defense on board, which does not have BKO on board, fights air defense and electronic warfare?
            and why is it possible to detect a small bomb with reduced EPR by the radar, but is it already impossible to large bomb, on which no EPR was reduced?
  4. poquello
    poquello 20 February 2018 16: 54
    +2
    Abroad, nothing like the "Drill" is not.

    it’s very interesting, why did the bourgeois discuss
    1. Imh
      Imh 20 February 2018 17: 02
      +3
      And all the same, "analogue" what to do?
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 20 February 2018 17: 51
        +3
        Quote: IMH
        And all the same, "analogue" what to do?

        Na-zo-vi-te analog.
        1. Imh
          Imh 20 February 2018 18: 03
          +1
          So there is no analogue, it is written in the article
  5. AntiFREEZ
    AntiFREEZ 20 February 2018 16: 55
    +6
    (without the aircraft entering the air defense coverage area) ........ The dropped bomb can plan up to 30 kilometers,

    LOL laughing laughing
    And who has air defense for 30 km? Do barmaley or Papuans?
    Lavrov quote.
    1. shinobi
      shinobi 20 February 2018 16: 58
      0
      Apparently, it was meant that the air defense was successfully crushed before that.
    2. Muvka
      Muvka 20 February 2018 17: 02
      +1
      Near-range air defense, I suppose.
    3. DarkMatter
      DarkMatter 20 February 2018 17: 04
      +4

      30 km air defense?

      A column on the march, for example. What is the radius of the air defense of the Americans, do not enlighten?
      Yes, you never know enough examples, not everywhere Patriots and S-400 are, do not believe it))
      1. AntiFREEZ
        AntiFREEZ 20 February 2018 17: 28
        +1
        Quote: DarkMatter
        Column on the march, for example

        Do not find a little inconsistent with
        adjusting flight using GPS and GLONASS signals.
        there would be a more tele-radio and / or laser came up.
        ================================================
        The clumsy presentation of information by our journalists causes laughter.
        1. DarkMatter
          DarkMatter 20 February 2018 17: 55
          +2
          The cassette is delivered to the point, and each element has its own guidance on specific goals. Shot, forgot.
          By the way, 30 km, as I understand it, is not the limit, it depends on the dump height. Yes, and they also say there must be friend or foe receivers.
          The clumsy presentation of information by our journalists causes laughter.

          You can’t argue with this, in every second article there are schools. Although no, even more often laughing
    4. Imh
      Imh 20 February 2018 17: 05
      +3
      Those with whom superpowers are fighting today are either barmaleys or Papuans.
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. sivuch
      sivuch 20 February 2018 18: 21
      +1
      Rjunimagu laughing laughing
      And in vain.
      Firstly, 30 km is not the maximum figure, and secondly, to climb a few km the plane is enough for half a minute, if not less, i.e. within the reaction time of medium-range air defense systems. After starting, the plane again drops to a criminally small one and runs home, and only a container flies to the target. He, of course, is not invisible and unbreakable, but still it’s more difficult to shoot down, and most importantly, there is no danger to the pilot.
      And an approximate analogue, of course, is -AGM-154 / SKEET
      1. AntiFREEZ
        AntiFREEZ 20 February 2018 18: 49
        +1
        Quote: sivuch
        30 km is not the maximum

        This is from 14 kilometers.
        Quote: sivuch
        within the reaction time of medium-range air defense systems.

        Exactly. Kirdyk to the plane.
        Quote: sivuch
        just half a minute to go up a few kilometers

        Well, yes you can with 20. wink
        Quote: sivuch
        And an approximate analogue, of course, is -AGM-154 / SKEET

        No compliments to our imperfection.

        However, everything has already been discussed: https://topwar.ru/133339-rossiyskie-vks-poluchat-
        samopricelivayuschuyusya-drel-v-etom-godu.html

        And your comment is there too wink
        1. sivuch
          sivuch 21 February 2018 08: 56
          +1
          1.30 km is not the maximum
          This is from 14 kilometers.
          ------------------------
          Where does such confidence come from? Since you read the previous discussion, you should have seen -
          Delivery to the region is carried out in a passive mode, the work of damaging elements is active, which eliminates the need for a carrier to capture and illuminate the target (the “reset-forget” principle is implemented). The range of the drop height is from 100 meters to 14 km at a speed of a carrier aircraft of 700 up to 1100 km / h. Maximum range of use - about 50 km
          Moreover, indicating the source. So 30 km is not at all from 14 km
          2. within the reaction time range of medium-range air defense systems.
          Exactly. Kirdyk to the plane.
          --- Do you know what reaction time is?
          1. AntiFREEZ
            AntiFREEZ 21 February 2018 09: 19
            0
            Quote: sivuch
            --- Do you know what reaction time is?

            - the time interval between the moment of detection of an air target by means of detecting an anti-aircraft missile system (SAM) and the launch of the first anti-aircraft guided missile (SAM). (s)
            Quote: sivuch
            Maximum range of use - about 50 km
            Moreover, indicating the source

            In the last article:
            the maximum planning range is 30 km, the maximum height of the initial application point is 14 thousand m

            by your link:
            The dump height range is from 100 meters to 14 km at a carrier aircraft speed of 700 to 1100 km / h. The maximum range of application is about 50 km.

            Well, let it be 50 km from 14 km altitude, and does it change a lot in terms of protection from medium-range air defense systems?
            (According to foreign classification, medium-range air defense systems include complexes with a firing range of 20 to 100 km)
            Quote: sivuch
            those. within the reaction time of medium-range air defense systems
            1. sivuch
              sivuch 21 February 2018 10: 01
              +1
              this changes the fact that the carrier does not need to climb to a height of 14 km to ensure a launch range of 20-30 km. That is, you can climb to a height of 5-6 km, drop the product and drop into the radar shadow. Even if the air defense system manages to launch (also not a fact), the escort will be disrupted and the missile will go on self-destruction.
              Moreover, for Drill typical targets are columns of armored vehicles, i.e. not far from the front line, and SAM - a few tens of kilometers from it.
  6. san4es
    san4es 20 February 2018 16: 59
    +1
    soldier
    The advantage of a unified planning bomb bomb compared to a similar air-to-surface guided missile is its lower price and significantly larger mass of combat equipment, which is over 70% of the mass of PBC, as well as the possibility of hitting multiple targets in one go.
    According to Bazalt’s executives at the presentation, it is planned to retrofit the PBC-500U with a high-energy engine in the future, which will significantly increase the range of the cassette’s controlled flight while maintaining its accuracy characteristics. In this version, PBC-500U will be comparable with the American JSOW-ER system.

    1. Don
      Don 20 February 2018 17: 56
      +2
      Quote: san4es
      According to Bazalt’s executives at the presentation, it is planned to retrofit the PBC-500U with a high-energy engine in the future, which will significantly increase the range of the cassette’s controlled flight while maintaining its accuracy characteristics. In this version, PBC-500U will be comparable with the American JSOW-ER system.

      They wrote to you that there are no analogues. And you write that in the future, after refinement, it will be comparable with the mattress thing? You are probably not a patriot, but from the fifth column laughing
      1. san4es
        san4es 20 February 2018 18: 04
        0
        Quote: Donskoy
        ... from the fifth column laughing

        http://www.missiles.ru/Smart-bomb.htm
  7. shinobi
    shinobi 20 February 2018 17: 01
    0
    Yes, there are no analogues. Only Russia and China are actively developing cluster munitions. Even there, the mattresses tried to fuss but failed.
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 20 February 2018 19: 51
      +3
      And then what?
      Since 1999, JSOW weapons have been used successfully during the military operations Southern Watch, Allied Force, Enduring Freedom (2002) and Iraqi Freedom (2003). F-16, F / A-18, B-1, B-2, B-52, F-15E, F-35 and many other aircraft are compatible with JSOW weapons. The total production for the US military is planned to exceed 20 units.
      The AGM-154A has been designed for soft field applications (mobile and stationary). is he carries 145 ammunition with the combined effect of BLU-97 / B.
      http://www.deagel.com/Offensive-Weapons/AGM-154A-
      JSOW_a001153001.aspx
  8. BVS
    BVS 20 February 2018 17: 03
    +4
    Liked - "Abroad there is nothing like" Drills "no.". Again ahead of the rest. In a quarter of the population of the Russian Federation, there is no need for a yard or gas, but bombs are the envy of everyone.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 20 February 2018 17: 14
      +7
      Quote: bvs
      Liked - "Abroad there is nothing like" Drills "no.". Again ahead of the rest. In a quarter of the population of the Russian Federation, there is no need for a yard or gas, but bombs are the envy of everyone.

      And in Kazakhstan, with these straightforward things, I went into the steppe and blow as much as you like. bully
    3. In100gram
      In100gram 20 February 2018 18: 46
      +5
      Quote: bvs
      Again ahead of the rest. In a quarter of the population of the Russian Federation, there is no need for a yard or gas

      Well, yes, Putin doesn’t build and run gas and gas again. If the house has a master, everything can be done. And the need is warm and gas. You just need to roll up your sleeves, and do something on the topic. Most
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. Wolka
    Wolka 20 February 2018 17: 24
    +1
    good damn thing, an excellent crusher for the dull ...
  11. Lexus
    Lexus 20 February 2018 17: 25
    +6
    A dropped bomb can plan up to 30 kilometers

    Not impressive. And, in general, it looks like a log.
    When will we live to really PLANNING domestic bombs?
    1. Don
      Don 20 February 2018 18: 03
      +1
      Quote: lexus
      Not impressive. And, in general, it looks like a log.
      When will we live to really PLANNING domestic bombs?

      That's when the engine is attached to it, then we will survive.
      Quote: lexus
      According to Bazalt’s executives at the presentation, it is planned to retrofit the PBC-500U with a high-energy engine in the future, which will significantly increase the range of the cassette’s controlled flight while maintaining its accuracy characteristics. In this version, PBC-500U will be comparable with the American JSOW-ER system.

      Another thing bothers me how our air defense systems (S-400, Buk M3) fight off these bombs planning hundreds of kilometers? Crossing with air defense and electronic warfare systems?
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 20 February 2018 18: 16
        +9
        TTX JSOW
        Length: 4,06 m
        Diameter: 406-519 mm
        Wingspan: 2,69 m
        Range:
        when starting from low altitudes - 22 km (12 nautical miles - some data 28 km)
        when starting from high altitude - 130 km (70 miles) / some data - 110 km / 60 miles (without engine!)
        with engine - up to 560 km (300 miles)
        Maximum bomb weight: 495 kg
        Warhead type: WDU-42 / B armor-piercing with thermobaric filler AFX-757
        Maximum warhead weight: 450 kg
        Weight BB 108 kg AFX-757
        And a photo in flight

        You want to say that the "barrel" described in the article with a completely absent aerodynamic quality will be comparable with it? Do not make me laugh.
        According to the presentation by the leaders of Basalt

        The “basalts” and “Promoters” do not promise that. They only learned this. Or did you expect that you would acknowledge your own “handshaking” and reproach yourself for it?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 20 February 2018 21: 32
          +1
          It would be better if a new reusable grenade launcher was handed over, in exchange for RPG 7.
      2. ghby
        ghby 21 February 2018 09: 03
        0
        Quote: Donskoy
        That's when the engine is attached to it, then we will survive.

        9M526 for MLRS 9K58 "Tornado" to help you. since 96 in service. The developer is the same.
    2. In100gram
      In100gram 20 February 2018 18: 47
      0
      Quote: lexus
      When will we live to really PLANNING domestic bombs?

      The combination of price and quality has not been canceled
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 20 February 2018 18: 58
        +4
        To make "cheaply" a weapon that does not correspond to the modern level means putting our military in a deliberately losing situation on the battlefield. However, such “savings” would not come out “sideways” if an airplane with a sim “work of art” would not be able to fly to the point of discharge.
        The next "achievement" will be this?
        1. In100gram
          In100gram 20 February 2018 20: 25
          +1
          Quote: lexus
          To make "cheaply" a weapon that does not correspond to the modern level means putting our military in a deliberately losing situation on the battlefield. However, such “savings” would not come out “sideways” if an airplane with a sim “work of art” would not be able to fly to the point of discharge.
          The next "achievement" will be this?

          And what, in non-nuclear warfare do we have opponents to whom we cannot fly 30-40 km? There will be no conventional war with the rest. And there are cruise missiles.
          1. Lexus
            Lexus 20 February 2018 20: 59
            +4
            And what, in non-nuclear warfare do we have opponents to whom we cannot fly 30-40 km? There will be no conventional war with the rest. And there are cruise missiles.

            In the light of what is happening, believe me, they are full. Ward 404 with "Bukami" and S-300 early modifications, "Patriots" are in service with 19 countries. Even the "Improved Hawks" of the latest modifications are hit at 45-50 km. You can't get enough of all the “potential” cruise missiles. Saving "fake" is obtained. Whether it’s a normal planning UAB worth several million rubles in addition to the Kyrgyz Republic with a cost of more than 100 million rubles.
            A significant minus of the CR - a fairly long flight time to the target - at the crucial moment of "arrival" the disposition can change dramatically. And the "shooting" of the Kyrgyz Republic on the entire flight path is more likely than the defeat of a maneuvering UAB weighing several hundred kilograms.
            Peremptory "hatred" and "ur-patriotism" are simply inappropriate. hi
    3. sivuch
      sivuch 21 February 2018 10: 31
      +1
      I tried to google Drill - aerodynamic quality, I did not find anything concrete.
      It is clear that the product in your photo has significantly higher AK.
      Here is a man who, as I understand it, knows, writes:
      I believe that such an aerodynamic scheme involves adjusting the fall along a ballistic trajectory, and not a lengthy planning flight.
      OK. I will say briefly - you are mistaken. You can really count for fidelity. TsAGI thought it was flying in Akhtubinsk, the results are almost the same. Ready to offer something else?
      Quote, BorSch message. No. 61
      In the published characteristics, by the way, the defeat range of this seemingly planning cartridge is not shyly mentioned
      The damage range is reflected in the TTZ for the product. TTZ is not a subject for publication on the Internet. Like the video from the test.
      https://vpk.name/news/156785_bondarev_istrebitel_
      t50_nachnet_postupat_v_voiska_v_2017_godu.html # m3
      33454
      And so, you have to wait for Thunder
  12. flicker
    flicker 20 February 2018 17: 36
    +3
    Russian Armed Forces will adopt the latest Drill aerial bomb in 2018
    Syrians can be offered for trial.
  13. Herculesic
    Herculesic 20 February 2018 17: 43
    +1
    I'm all for it "! hi We really need planning bombs, especially if the plane bombes a target without entering the air defense zone!
  14. Serpent Pliskin
    Serpent Pliskin 20 February 2018 18: 11
    +2
    Some kind of incompatible delirium stream:
    "A dropped bomb can plan up to 30 kilometers."
    "without an airplane entering the air defense facilities coverage area"

    Also, neither knock down, nor detect ... some kind of wunderwaffle!
    in short: dumb analogahs!
  15. Kerensky
    Kerensky 20 February 2018 18: 12
    0
    But how do the elements know that a neighboring element has already been aimed at this tank?
  16. Xscorpion
    Xscorpion 20 February 2018 18: 22
    +1
    Quote: Muvka
    Near-range air defense, I suppose.


    Not necessarily, the air defense strike zone is both in range and in height. These bombs can be dropped at ranges of 20 km and from a height of 20 km, where not every long-range air defense system will reach, although it will be able to work on paper for hundreds of km. In the technical specifications of air defense systems, dry characteristics are indicated, such as range separately, height separately. But there are many nuances. In particular, the target’s altitude / range ratio, that is, the probability of hitting a target with one missile, varies greatly. Roughly speaking, if a missile system hits a target with confidence with a range of 100 km and an altitude of 5 km, it is far from the fact that he will hit this target at a distance of 30 km and an altitude of 15 km with the same probability, although his characteristics seem to allow it.
    1. mult-65
      mult-65 20 February 2018 23: 50
      0
      There is such a thing in air defense - “parameter”. :)
  17. Mentat
    Mentat 20 February 2018 18: 38
    +7
    Quote: IMH
    And all the same, "analogue" what to do?

    Are you okay? Or does envy strangle so much that stupidities climb involuntarily?
    The closest analogue is AGM-154, but it does not have the above characteristics.
    1. Application in electronic warfare conditions.
    2. A friend or foe system (not mentioned in the article). Those. the bomb can be dropped directly on the tank battle and she will choose enemies herself.
    3. Able to hit cold targets. Those. a tank with a cold engine, for example.
    4. You can change the type of cartridge elements. Now there are against concrete machinery and structures.

    Therefore, there are really no direct analogues and close.
    Drink a sedative so that you don’t get distorted.
    1. Mimoprohodil
      Mimoprohodil 20 February 2018 22: 17
      0
      Quote: Mentat
      The closest analogue is AGM-154, but it does not have the above characteristics.
      1. Application in electronic warfare conditions.

      An INS + GLONASS-guided bomb can be used in electronic warfare conditions, and an INS + GPS-guided bomb cannot be used. So your way?
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 20 February 2018 23: 17
      +1
      "In 2014, the United States began work on a version of the SDB bomb, aimed at a source of interference for the GPS system." - Hello to electronic warfare systems.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. Mentat
    Mentat 20 February 2018 18: 43
    +6
    Quote: lexus
    A dropped bomb can plan up to 30 kilometers

    Not impressive. And, in general, it looks like a log.
    When will we live to really PLANNING domestic bombs?

    “Not impressive,” because you are sitting here on a site for the purpose of propaganda.
    Compared to Drill, American bombs of a similar design all have a lower ratio of explosive mass to total mass.
    Bombs with an engine are neither fish nor meat at all, they have this ratio even worse, the use of rockets is more logical.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 20 February 2018 21: 35
      +2
      There is one thing but - the crumb bomb, but effective
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 20 February 2018 23: 12
        +2
        Such small guided bombs can also drop transport aircraft
  20. Mentat
    Mentat 20 February 2018 21: 49
    +4
    Quote: IMH
    The bomb for the Russian man is holy.

    So I understand, are you writing from Israel? Tell me, do you yourself feel that you are dishonoring your flag with such comments? Everyone should recognize the existence of anti-Semitism, but you don’t want to recognize your ugly Russophobia as your own.
    Or is the badge with a frag - just a cover, and somewhere there is a corrupt mug who would very much like to push the Jews and Russians together?
    A bomb for a Russian person is a tool to ward off all rot and trash from its native land, which in a thirst that has absorbed it is alive and its ugliness, called “exceptionality”, “higher race” and still somehow trying to cover up its mutilation, periodically climbs to us to get another lesson and calm down for several decades, calling himself a "civilized community." At the same time, they are infinitely far from truly educated people, creativity, art and progress, the desire to develop civilization, as well as the desire of people to live in peace and prosperity.
  21. Mentat
    Mentat 21 February 2018 00: 07
    0
    Quote: Mimoprohodil
    Quote: Mentat
    The closest analogue is AGM-154, but it does not have the above characteristics.
    1. Application in electronic warfare conditions.

    An INS + GLONASS-guided bomb can be used in electronic warfare conditions, and an INS + GPS-guided bomb cannot be used. So your way?

    This feature is indicated in the characteristics of the product from those that are in the public domain.
  22. Black Colonel
    Black Colonel 21 February 2018 00: 08
    0
    How long to? They have already written about this bomb. Crisis of the genre?
  23. Cympak
    Cympak 21 February 2018 03: 17
    +1
    Many times over this "Drill" they wrote .... and that the range is small for the planning bomb ... and that the mass and dimensions are large ... and that the Su-57 does not climb into the weapon compartments .... but it still doesn’t cannot be adopted.

    "Abroad, nothing like the" Drill "is not."
    Journalists, as usual, in their "nonsense" repertoire. There are JSOW and WCMD cluster bombs.
    But here is the problem for inquiring minds; Americans developed 3 variants of JSOW: with homing combat elements (analogues of our SPBE), with universal striking elements (cumulative-fragmentation incendiary), and with a conventional monoblock 500-pound warhead.
    Only the last option (monoblock) is delivered to the troops. Instead of the first two (cluster), we decided to equip ordinary cluster bombs with WCMD modules (Wind Corrected Munitions Dispenser), which, using the built-in GPS and ANN sensors, compensate for the impact of wind and other weather factors on the dropped bomb cluster. But even with this module, the bomb cluster can be dropped at a distance of 16-20 km from the target and has a circular deviation of only 26 m.
    And why abandoned the long-range cassette JSOW?
    Maybe due to the fact that a large range also means a long flight? And during this time, the enemy can change the speed and direction of movement, change position ....
    And then the “gifts” simply will not find their “recipients” at the calculated point of the meeting.
  24. Mentat
    Mentat 22 February 2018 19: 47
    0
    Quote: Donskoy
    Quote: san4es
    According to Bazalt’s executives at the presentation, it is planned to retrofit the PBC-500U with a high-energy engine in the future, which will significantly increase the range of the cassette’s controlled flight while maintaining its accuracy characteristics. In this version, PBC-500U will be comparable with the American JSOW-ER system.

    They wrote to you that there are no analogues. And you write that in the future, after refinement, it will be comparable with the mattress thing? You are probably not a patriot, but from the fifth column laughing

    And you, obviously, have a delay in understanding, let's call it that. In this passage, the range parameter is discussed, it will be comparable precisely, specifically for this parameter. There are no analogues in the aggregate characteristics. Already point by point, I understood why, but the delay in understanding does not allow me to refrain from "very smart" statements.
  25. Lucy
    Lucy 26 February 2018 00: 10
    0
    Quote: sivuch
    ....... Even if the air defense system manages to launch (also not a fact), the escort will be disrupted and the missile will go to self-liquidation ...............


    sivuch You need to plan your database maintenance with a worthy adversary, and not only with air defense systems, but also with multiple defense in height and depth. Probably you and you interlocutor, attached to the database in the SAR, or forgot that they would initially open the air defense system with unmanned aerial vehicles (if any), Su-24MR, and other RT-rms. Then there will be BPASP on the air defense system. Then, depending on the results (to make corridors), attempts to disable the air defense system, and after the regrouping of the air defense forces, reconnaissance will be carried out again. And then, controlled or uncontrolled TSA Ud.Group for a given purpose, if there is a tact in the power supply unit (force unit) is used. air defense breakout groups.

    I don’t know how the process of time passes from detection to target capture during the operation of an air defense system. When working PRLK - no more than 2 seconds., Then you wait for the permitted start-up. Therefore, after the detection of the air defense system, the trained air defense crews having driven it to the start-up will go through the capture stage before launch in 2-3 seconds.
    What is implied in the article "The ammunition is equipped with a complex of protection against air defense and electronic warfare ...." , for PBC, it is not clear.
    I suppose that this ammunition was created as effective (in comparison with RBC) and relatively cheap for use in the presence of object-based air defense, based on the accumulation of armored vehicles. It is possible and caliber 250 for 6-7 combat elements bungled.
  26. Lucy
    Lucy 26 February 2018 00: 20
    0
    Quote: Mentat
    2. A friend or foe system (not mentioned in the article). Those. the bomb can be dropped directly on the tank battle and she will choose enemies herself.


    And who will dump (apply) and how this PBC? I am not a tanker, but I suppose that the "tank battle" is moving. How is the process of applying this ammunition in the presence of the respondent "St. Aliens."
  27. Ivanov IV
    Ivanov IV 1 March 2018 16: 34
    0
    Dill to attack LDNR formed a reinforced armored fist. "Drill" was created specifically for such cases. So I would like to see "Drill" in work ....