Military Review

BDK "Peter Morgunov" will be launched in May 2018

18
The large landing ship (BDK) “Peter Morgunov”, which is being built for the Russian Navy at the Yantar Baltic Shipbuilding Plant, is scheduled to be launched in May 2018, the shipyard’s press secretary Sergei Mikhailov said, TASS reports.


In the second half of May, the BDK "Peter Morgunov" should be launched
- He said, adding that the transfer of the Navy ship will take place, as planned earlier, in 2018 year.

BDK "Peter Morgunov" will be launched in May 2018


According to Mikhailov, the "paratrooper" finished the year 2017 with the closing of the first technological stage - the end of the ship hull assembly assembly, and in 2018 "large-scale work is expected, including the aggregate replacement of the main engine." The interlocutor explained that, according to experts, "the most complicated operation is carried out in order to eliminate the problem with the control of the ship, which was revealed during the tests of the head BDK project 11711 - BDK" Ivan Gren ".

All this work should be completed by the end of April so that the ship could be launched in the second half of May. "

The large landing ship of the 11711 "Peter Morgunov" project was laid at the Yantar PSZ in Kaliningrad 11 in June 2015 of the year, currently it is on the stocks in the pre-launch position.

The ships of this development project of the Nevsky Design Bureau have a displacement of 5 thousand tons. The ship holds 13 main tanks, 36 armored personnel carriers or infantry fighting vehicles or 300 paratroopers. It is possible to deliver to the destination a reinforced company of marine corps with standard equipment and land them on pontoons brought with them. The armament of the ship consists of six-barreled automatic guns with a caliber of 30 millimeters, two transport and combat helicopters Ka-29 are based in deck hangars.
Photos used:
http://sdelano-u-nas.mirtesen.ru/
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor V
    Igor V 20 February 2018 16: 34
    +8
    Well, the results of modernization were not long in coming.
    Please correct the error in the header: this is not a large anti-submarine ship.
    1. Giant thought
      Giant thought 20 February 2018 16: 40
      +3
      This ship will be built much faster than the lead Ivan Gren, which undoubtedly pleases, it is only a pity that the series of these BDKs is already ending with the next ship.
      1. Tiksi-3
        Tiksi-3 20 February 2018 16: 43
        +1
        Quote: Thought Giant
        a series of these BDKs already ends with the next ship.

        and rightly so, we do not need such unsuccessful ships at all! for a long time it is time to let out new ... UDC ...
        1. Berkut24
          Berkut24 20 February 2018 19: 23
          +3
          for a long time it is time to let out new ... UDC ...

          Here the problem is "bifurcation." In the Syrian Express, the main work was not carried out by the BDK, but by the old Turkish dry cargo troughs. Purchased for a penny on the verge of write-off. They did not go for long, but they completed the task. Therefore, obviously, in the future it is necessary to build a truly UDC, but on a par with them, it is also necessary to lay cheaper and simple bulk carriers for the Navy, with the simplest defensive weapons from pirates. In which case, give bulk carriers to the escort unit at the guard level.
      2. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 20 February 2018 16: 47
        +3
        Quote: Thought Giant
        This ship will be built much faster than the lead Ivan Gren,
        - Now our main "sore" is ship diesel engines. And how to understand: "aggregate replacement of the main engine"? Well, then - everything else ...
        1. Igor V
          Igor V 20 February 2018 17: 02
          +3
          Quote: oldseaman1957
          Quote: Thought Giant
          This ship will be built much faster than the lead Ivan Gren,
          - Now our main "sore" is ship diesel engines. And how to understand: "aggregate replacement of the main engine"? Well, then - everything else ...

          The machine consists of units, assembly units and parts. A unit is a complete assembly unit that performs a specific function and has its own characteristics. For example, a gearbox.
          In this case, apparently, it makes no sense to change the whole machine, and only parts of it - the units - are being replaced.
          1. insular
            insular 21 February 2018 04: 54
            0
            Quote: Igor V
            In this case, apparently, it makes no sense to change the whole machine, and only parts of it - the units - are being replaced.

            In relation to the internal combustion engine, the engine block is the unit - all rotating and oscillating nodes of the crank mechanism and oil supply are combined here. Auxiliary (peripheral) units are a generator, a servo pump, a starter and an ignition system (If for car ICEs).
            So the machine itself is a pure unit, so the question is "how to understand:" aggregate replacement of the main engine "?" - very much the place to be.
    2. poquello
      poquello 20 February 2018 16: 43
      +1
      Quote: Igor V
      Well, the results of modernization were not long in coming.
      Please correct the error in the header: this is not a large anti-submarine ship.

      ett still need to see how they will do it, otherwise it will turn out anti-airborne, like to spread rot
    3. cormorant
      cormorant 20 February 2018 18: 24
      0
      Well, just a couple more of these to lay ... Do not brake, we consolidate the success ...
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. Russia
      Russia 20 February 2018 16: 39
      +12
      Typo. Antisubmarine would also be nice, we are waiting.
  3. BVS
    BVS 20 February 2018 17: 01
    0
    Diesel locomotives of the Kolomensky Zavod still cannot provide ship quality engines. The sea ship is still not a diesel locomotive, although diesel locomotives must sometimes back up.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 20 February 2018 18: 25
      +2
      In general, yes. The crankshaft was broken on Gorshkov - now they understand who is to blame for the naval or factory marriage. But they at least have a perspective in the form of D500. Maybe by the 22-25 year a relatively modern diesel engine will get to the fleet.

      But the 56 cylinder high-speed “masterpieces” from the Star do not shine with the resource in 8000 watches. Under Khrushchev - it was still normal (when the engine was done), but today its efficiency, the periods between maintenance / bulkheads - just a stone age.
      1. Omskgasmyas
        Omskgasmyas 21 February 2018 11: 34
        0
        It seems the connecting rod broke on Gorshkov. Although the crankshaft could suffer.
  4. Lexus
    Lexus 20 February 2018 17: 15
    0
    It’s kind of small and kurguzy, but as they say,
    fishless and cancer

    Meanwhile, China is already building a full-fledged UDC, according to the type and dimension of Wasp.
    1. Romario_Argo
      Romario_Argo 20 February 2018 22: 54
      0
      while we still have the plan of updating the IPC (20380, 20385 corvettes), MRK (22800, 21631), Watchdogs (22160), Frigates (11356, 22350), Minesweepers (12700), Scouts (18280), BDK (11711), Guide , Sea and Raid tugs, Tankers ....
      and only then, when we spin up, we will proceed to the UDC, destroyers (22350M) and aircraft carriers ...
      1. Lexus
        Lexus 20 February 2018 23: 13
        0
        corvettes 20380, 20385

        Does Poliment Redut work?
        22800, 21631

        With Chinese diesels?
        22350

        One is brought, another is being built. It's enough?
        12700

        Idem.
        22350M

        This is a frigate. While in the "wet" dreams.
        1. Romario_Argo
          Romario_Argo 20 February 2018 23: 17
          0
          systematically load our shipyards with orders for a decade, so that you don’t have to issue pans later and give them your salary
  5. Ryazan87
    Ryazan87 20 February 2018 18: 01
    +5
    Quote: Thought Giant
    This ship will be built much faster

    This is not so difficult, given the construction and commissioning of Ivan Gren.
    However, in 2018 I do not believe in the surrender of Morgunov. Will they let them down in the second half of May, will they complete, form, and populate the crew, conduct mooring trials, land and land fortifications and landfills in 6 months? Even in the absence of serious comments - a fantasy for our shipbuilding.