Military Review

Kiev: There will be no Belarusian peacekeepers in the Donbas until there is NATO there

33
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine said that the presence of Belarusian soldiers in the Donbas is out of the question unless a contingent from NATO countries is sent to the conflict zone as part of the peacekeepers. At the same time, the Foreign Ministry of Ukraine noted that they advocate exclusively for the option of deploying peacekeepers on the border with Russia. Recall that Russia is ready to support the deployment of UN peacekeepers along the line of contact of the parties, which the Minsk agreements do not actually contradict.


Earlier, Belarusian Foreign Minister Vladimir Makei noted that Belarus is ready to send its peacekeepers to Donbass if the parameters of the peacekeeping mission are agreed by the UN Security Council, and if such a shipment is supported by President Alexander Lukashenko.

Kiev: There will be no Belarusian peacekeepers in the Donbas until there is NATO there


The deputy foreign minister of Ukraine, Elena Zerkal, stated that the Belarusian servicemen “will not be able” to join the peacekeeping mission, “if there are no NATO countries soldiers in it,” since “Belarus has not left the CSTO at the moment”.

UNIAN quotes Ms. Zerkal:
This is understandable not only to us, but also to our Western partners. It is also clear that the mission should unfold in stages - first along the border with Russia.
Photos used:
http://www.mil.by
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Evil543
    Evil543 20 February 2018 05: 45
    +12
    Old Man needs to be offended and cut off the fuel, it’s even better than peacekeepers
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 20 February 2018 05: 51
      +11
      Old Man with or without it knows how to be offended very well!
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 20 February 2018 15: 47
        0
        Herculesic
        Old Man with or without it knows how to be offended very well!

        I also almost misunderstood the article.

        First of all, the article says everything politically correctly about R. Belarus:
        Belarus Foreign Minister Vladimir Makei noted that Belarus is ready to send its peacekeepers to the Donbass if the parameters of the peacekeeping mission are agreed upon by the UN Security Council, and if such a dispatch is supported by President Alexander Lukashenko.
        And everything is correctly said about the essence of the provocative policy of the modern authorities of Ukraine.
        Moreover, Ukraine does not just insist on its juntish solution of the Donbas issue in its favor! But at the same time, also interfering in the internal affairs of R. Belarus herself!
        On the one hand, Khuntyashny Kiev insists not just on placing the so-called UN peacekeeping forces as part of NATO along the Russian borders, namely along the Russian borders and with the DPR and LPR - i.e. on the territory of the LPR and the DPR, which in itself means the surrender of the LPR and DPR to the Kiev junta, bypassing the Minsk agreements in favor of the illegitimate government of Kiev.
        Mirror:
        This is understandable not only to us, but also to our Western partners. It is also clear that the mission should unfold in stages - first along the border with Russia.
        And on the other hand, the leadership of the junting Kiev, represented by the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Elena Zerkal, is not just and not only interfering in the internal affairs of the sovereign R. Belarus, dragging R. Belarus, firstly, into NATO, and secondly, demanding R. Belarus leave CSTO, but even violates the powers of the sovereign R. Belarus in the UN itself!
        Namely.
        The deputy foreign minister of Ukraine, Elena Zerkal, stated that the Belarusian servicemen “will not be able” to join the peacekeeping mission, “if there are no NATO countries soldiers in it,” since “Belarus has not left the CSTO at the moment”.
    2. Maz
      Maz 20 February 2018 07: 33
      +2
      So NATO will go there soon.
      1. XXXIII
        XXXIII 20 February 2018 08: 33
        0
        Quote: Maz
        So NATO will go there soon.

        Not enough money.....
      2. mig29mks
        mig29mks 20 February 2018 14: 09
        +1
        If it comes in, it will not work out, it is their dream to stand on our borders!
    3. vasya.pupkin
      vasya.pupkin 20 February 2018 13: 00
      +1
      Quote: Evil543
      Old Man needs to be offended and cut off the fuel, it’s even better than peacekeepers

      Do not encroach on the "holy", loot separately, show off separately.
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 20 February 2018 05: 49
    +10
    What are they on the border with Russia rod? We are not at war with LDNR! This ukrovoyak needs to be isolated from LDNR!
    1. 210ox
      210ox 20 February 2018 06: 22
      +4
      I am not against peacekeepers on the border ..... On the administrative border of Lugansk, Donetsk, Kherson and further south ..
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      What are they on the border with Russia rod? We are not at war with LDNR! This ukrovoyak needs to be isolated from LDNR!
      1. Maz
        Maz 20 February 2018 07: 34
        0
        Right bank for starters
      2. rocket757
        rocket757 20 February 2018 07: 50
        +6
        For the Kherson region, I have all four FOR!
        I would like to visit relatives, calmly so, Schaub did not have to go to the tank.
        Shaw their Old Man is not happy with the Finns in conjunction. Not ours, not yours, a compromise.
        1. XXXIII
          XXXIII 20 February 2018 08: 57
          +1
          Quote: rocket757
          Shaw their Old Man is not happy with the Finns in conjunction. Not ours, not yours, a compromise.
          A good bunch, some on the "atom" side are Finns, and on the LDNR side - RB or maybe vice versa recourse Maybe if it’s the other way around, then this is just not what suits them the option .... laughing
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 20 February 2018 09: 12
            +2
            If the conflict is not resolved, no one is going to solve it, but people die, it’s better to separate the parties to the conflict, at least somehow ... a reasonable compromise is everything that all parties to the conflict can accept at the moment.
            It’s not forever, it’s not the best option ... and then there are many pros and cons.
    2. electrooleg
      electrooleg 20 February 2018 07: 42
      +2
      Listen more often to women, they’re not gossiping like that yet. They generally need to drive a mop with politics to the stove and the washing machine!
      1. Antares
        Antares 20 February 2018 11: 32
        0
        Quote: elektroleg
        often women listen, they’re not gossiping like that yet.

        women from politics are usually sent to mitigate the effects of various incidents ... but or to carry a political blizzard ... in all countries. RF is no exception.
        Although some may do business. And they remain in the memory for a long time.
        Margaret and Angela for example.
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 20 February 2018 05: 50
    +6
    NATO should not be close there. Otherwise, the Croatian scenario is irreplaceable! NATO will be there as a screen to cover the massacre that the Ukrainian army will arrange. I won’t even be amazed when I find out that the NATO troops will participate one way or another in this massacre.
  4. worms
    worms 20 February 2018 05: 57
    0
    Quote: Evil543
    Old Man needs to be offended and cut off the fuel, it’s even better than peacekeepers

    But what father? can we be offended and dig through the fuel ... lol
  5. worms
    worms 20 February 2018 06: 01
    +1
    the Sumerians are giving up, there is no longer former pathos and scope of thought, the whole world is with them, so I suggest they go on the other side of the ball and begin to unfold by the peacekeeping contingent somewhere near the border of India ....
  6. cedar
    cedar 20 February 2018 06: 12
    +3
    The idea of ​​the owners of the money ... To drag the wolves, NATO-US troops, to Ukraine under the sheepskins of the peacekeepers. Arrange a provocation, a little two, three, and then to drive the wolf packs of NATO, together with local jackals to Russia. At the same time set fire to Central Asia and uncover the fifth column in the Russian Federation. Everything as usual.
    See the root. The ideas of world bankers are the same as they were before WWI, before WWII, and such and the Third World are moving. Blood. Gold. Power. Himself, while the world burns, sit out in the chill ...
    1. Metallurg_2
      Metallurg_2 20 February 2018 11: 26
      +1
      It’s useless to fight in wolf packs - TMV, if there is one, is necessarily nuclear. And this, as they say, is neither ours nor yours.
  7. Streletskos
    Streletskos 20 February 2018 06: 54
    +16
    Belarusian peacekeepers are an ideal option
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 February 2018 06: 59
    +1
    Did they go crazy there? Peacekeepers from NATO? On the border with Russia! Maybe they also give armored vehicles in support? And how are they poor there, will they cope? Oh, what nonsense!
  9. APASUS
    APASUS 20 February 2018 07: 38
    0
    Is Klimkin bad at all?
    Who will agree to the deployment of peacekeepers from NATO countries. Where has not gone with peacekeepers from neutral countries, and "peacekeepers from NATO" have long been deployed there and we are already seeing the results!
  10. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 20 February 2018 08: 08
    +1
    ... well, then there will be no Belarusian peacekeepers at all .. It's obvious))
  11. agbykov
    agbykov 20 February 2018 08: 23
    0
    Huh huh not ho ho
  12. CAT BAIYUN
    CAT BAIYUN 20 February 2018 08: 27
    0
    This is understandable not only to us, but also to our Western partners. It is also clear that the mission should unfold in stages - first along the border with Russia.

    Bullshit ... that's where the animals are ... pulling their little song about evil Russia and the introduction of forces to the border, and not to the line of demarcation. They sleep and see how to strangle Donbass.
  13. Rostislav
    Rostislav 20 February 2018 08: 44
    +4
    So no question. Take LDNR to Russia and place peacekeepers on the border. ,,
    1. rocket757
      rocket757 20 February 2018 09: 19
      +1
      Well done, cut the Gordian knot in one fell swoop!
      We don’t give a damn about the sanctions, not everyone, of course, the fat belts will be against ... their denyushki will be covered with a hook ... again, we don’t give a damn, you don’t steal and keep \ use at home.
      In theory, their wishes were taken into account ... they wanted doves on our border, get and sign!
  14. XXXIII
    XXXIII 20 February 2018 08: 46
    0
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine announced that there could be no talk of the presence of Belarusian troops in the Donbass unless a contingent from NATO countries was sent to the conflict zone.
    How do they like to make decisions and indicate ..... laughing
    Underlying principles
    There are three main principles that allow us to continue to consider UN peacekeeping operations as an independent tool for ensuring international peace and security.

    These three principles are interconnected and mutually reinforcing:

    consent of the parties;
    impartiality;
    non-use of force, except in cases of self-defense and protection of the mandate.
    http://www.un.org/ru/peacekeeping/operations/pkma
    ndates.shtml
  15. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 20 February 2018 09: 30
    +1
    Nothing is more annoying than dumb marginals in power, especially in public positions. Ukraine in this sense is the standard. Starting with their anthem, she has not died yet, but the patient is more likely dead than alive. If you want to lose interest in the joys of life, it is enough to listen to the performance of Ukrainian authorities. You can’t listen for a long time - it is fraught with a depressive state.
    1. Antares
      Antares 20 February 2018 11: 38
      0
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Ukraine in this sense, the standard

      the standard of democratic processes is not Ukraine. I repeat, such people are in power in many countries. RF is no exception.
      Quote: Alex-a832
      Starting from their anthem, she has not died yet, but the patient is more likely dead than alive.

      there is not "died fame and will" and not the country
      Quote: Alex-a832
      If you want to lose interest in the joys of life, it is enough to listen to the performance of Ukrainian authorities. You can’t listen for a long time - it is fraught with a depressive state.

      Do not read Ukrainian news in the morning.
      As for peacekeepers from Belarus. As far as I understand, Kiev - if from the ODBC, then from NATO 50% to 50%. Russia does not go to NATO (in any proportion)
      So RB flies out of the list. Although they are preferable in terms of language and situation, they will clearly be on the side of the Russian side (block, influence, actions)
      Kiev needs at the same time either neutral to the Russian Federation and Russian blocs, and closer to NATO. NATO itself is best, but here the red line. For some programs, the idea of ​​the red lines of the Russian Federation in these matters was clearly conveyed (not the presence of NATO at the border is a clear marker)
  16. Chichikov
    Chichikov 20 February 2018 11: 31
    +3
    The answer is simple!
    No country whose representatives previously made a statement that - terrorists rule in Donbass, Donbass is occupied by Russia, or supported sanctions against Russia, for these reasons, has no right to offer troops for the UN mission! Since this speaks of a one-sided, biased position regarding the situation in Ukraine and non-compliance with one of the basic principles of international law, it means the right of each people to independently decide on the form of their state existence, freely establish their political status and exercise their economic and cultural development.

    We did not begin to divide the citizens of Ukraine into Ukrainians and others! We are the Russian people and we do not consider ourselves Ukrainians anymore!
  17. Radikal
    Radikal 20 February 2018 12: 45
    0
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine announced that there could be no talk of the presence of Belarusian troops in the Donbass unless a contingent from NATO countries was sent to the conflict zone.
    This is all thanks to the “father’s”! wassat