Military Review

Amerikosovo: 10 years

44
"..Reaffirming the commitment of all Member States to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and other states of the region", is nothing more than a quote from the preamble of an important historical document - UN Security Council Resolution No. 1244, adopted on 10 on June 1999. The resolution concerned the settlement of the conflict around the Serbian province of Kosovo and Metohija.


Amerikosovo: 10 years


10 years ago this resolution was trampled on in a monstrous way. 17 February 2008 in the capital of Pristina, the so-called “Kosovo parliament” proclaimed the formation of an “independent state”. After this coarse redistribution of the territory, after the violence perpetrated over the UN Security Council resolution, it would seem that the “civilized world” once and for all should shut up in a rag and be silent about Abkhazia and South Ossetia, Transdniestria and the Crimea, the DPR and the LPR. But no, the policy of double standards continues in all its glory.

Is Kosovo’s pseudo-state independent, as it was announced by 10 years ago? On the contrary we are dealing with a puppet territorial formation where Serbs are still being killed (as recently happened with politician Oliver Ivanovich). Where the positions of "president" and "prime minister" are occupied by notorious gangsters, on account of which - the real blood of tortured, sold to the organs of people. And all this disgrace is crowned by the American military base "Bondstil".

The term “Amerikosovo” was introduced at the time by the Russian poetess Yunna Moritz in her poem “The Star of Serbo”. Then it was an adverb, meaning "American-style":

Khavaya Kosovo, amerikosovo
Bombs are flying ... Blood.


Yes, that's exactly the American way, “amerikosovo”, a bloody “democracy” was implanted in the Balkans. Through bombs and blood. Through violence, atrocities and incredible lies. Directly according to Goebbels - the more monstrous the lie, the sooner they will believe in it. And they believed in it! Of the victims made criminals, of the criminals - victims of violence. NATO members bombed the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia for 78 days in order for the country to be forced to give up part of its sovereignty.

Belgrade did not want to give up just like that. And it was never possible to achieve unconditional surrender from him, despite all the horrors of the war unleashed against Yugoslavia. The compromise option was a fragile truce enshrined in UN Security Council Resolution No. XXUMX, where the principle of the territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (FRY) was affirmed at the highest international level.

And the masters of those puppets who settled on the territory of Kosovo and Metohija after the withdrawal of the Yugoslav troops from there went against this. The principle of the territorial integrity of a European state was “safely” forgotten. More than a hundred countries have now recognized the “independence” of Kosovo. But this still does not mean that it is legally a state - even after some compromises on the part of Belgrade itself, which is under intense international pressure (although not in the form of bombs filled with depleted uranium, but economic and political).

And these compromises became possible only after the coup d'état in Yugoslavia 5-6 of October 2000 of the year, which marked the beginning of a series of "color revolutions" around the world. After him, those who, together with the West, chose to “forget” about the fact that the territorial integrity of Yugoslavia legally has not been canceled, came to power.

Soon after the NATO puppets came to power in Belgrade, Yugoslavia itself was no more. At first it was transformed into the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, later it was canceled. And this makes it possible for the supporters of “independence” of Kosovo to assert that, they say, since Yugoslavia is no longer there, then resolution No. 1244 has lost its force. Nothing like this! The successor of Yugoslavia to the UN is Serbia. The above resolution applies to it.

At present, Europe is committing a shameless crime like blackmail against Serbia. The possible entry into the EU is hanging out in front of the current Serbian leadership, like a carrot in front of the donkey’s eyes. In order to get the desired "treat" (in the form of EU membership), Belgrade must not only renounce Kosovo, but also join the sanctions against Russia. They are trying to complete the fact that the NATO bombs have not completed the bombs with the help of this “carrot”.

Meanwhile, on the eve of the 10 anniversary of the false "independence" of Kosovo, the representative of Russia to the OSCE Alexander Lukashevich demanded that this structure consider the rights of the non-Albanian minority in the province. He noted that in the time that passed after the withdrawal of Serbian troops from Kosovo, only 148 non-Albanians were able to return to the province, while 200 thousands were expelled.

But the UN Security Council resolution No. XXUMX, in addition to the territorial integrity of Yugoslavia, implies return of all refugees. It says:

... Holds that the core responsibilities of an international civil presence will include:
(j) Protection and promotion of human rights;
(k) Ensuring the safe and unimpeded return of all refugees and displaced persons to their homes in Kosovo


In this way, the puppet pseudo-state "Amerikosovo" is not only built on blood and lies, but also continues to grossly violate all imaginable and inconceivable human rights. Europe is silent. States are silent. There is nothing to say.
Author:
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. XII Legion
    XII Legion 19 February 2018 07: 04
    +21
    The precedent was terrible
    Now all of Europe is reaping the benefits
    1. Pete mitchell
      Pete mitchell 19 February 2018 12: 23
      +8
      Quote: XII legion
      It was a terrible precedent. Now all of Europe is reaping the benefits

      The terrible thing is that they did not understand anything. They should see how the Albanians rushed between Albania and the former Yugoslavia before the start of 1/2 world wars and after the end, how many of them fled and how many, many times more, returned. Istoria repeats: about 50 escaped from Milosevic, but a quarter of a million returned under the wing of the "defenders" and the Americans put them on the neck of Europe.
      The whole layout is well known to Russian officers who served there under the UN flag. I had the opportunity to speak with NATO members who raised Serbs and Albanians. To the Serbs with respect: we agreed, they will do it and feed them a drink. Albanians - only while you keep the barrel near the head, they understand something ...
      Europe does not teach lessons at all that to be surprised - Europe is "dancing" ...
      1. Alber
        Alber 19 February 2018 19: 57
        +3
        Quote: Pete Mitchell
        Quote: XII legion
        It was a terrible precedent. Now all of Europe is reaping the benefits

        The terrible thing is that they did not understand anything. They should see how the Albanians rushed between Albania and the former Yugoslavia before the start of 1/2 world wars and after the end, how many of them fled and how many, many times more, returned. Istoria repeats: about 50 escaped from Milosevic, but a quarter of a million returned under the wing of the "defenders" and the Americans put them on the neck of Europe.
        The whole layout is well known to Russian officers who served there under the UN flag. I had the opportunity to speak with NATO members who raised Serbs and Albanians. To the Serbs with respect: we agreed, they will do it and feed them a drink. Albanians - only while you keep the barrel near the head, they understand something ...
        Europe does not teach lessons at all that to be surprised - Europe is "dancing" ...

        It was a disaster for Yugoslavia, for Milosevic and for the Serbs.
        The Yankees organized the dismemberment of the country, the terrible massacre and genocide of the Serbian people. Serbs are one of the closest Russian-related Slavic peoples. The collapse of the USSR was organized by the same black forces that organized the destruction of the SFRY
        1. pytar
          pytar 21 February 2018 13: 06
          0
          It was a disaster for Yugoslavia, for Milosevic and for the Serbs.

          It was a disaster / at first / for all the peoples of the former SFRY, while the first Yugoslav war was fought in the territories of Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Slovenia. Not on the Serbian / Montenegrin territory! And the division became a tragedy, because it happened along the path of bloodshed, and not by peaceful means, as the Czech Republic and Slovakia divided, for example. In relation to the former southeast republics, Serbia was an aggressor! But in Russia, only the Serbian point of view is heard. Opinions from other republics are not heard for some reason ... Nowadays, not one of the former republics regrets that they have gained independence. True, independence is always relative, but that is another matter.
          the terrible massacre and genocide of the Serbian people

          Your sympathy for the Serbs, understandable. In fact, in fact, the former south-republics were defending themselves against Serbian invasion, as they were obviously weaker than Serbia. In the Yugoslav wars, everyone slaughtered everyone, as during WWII. The Balkan mentality, unfortunately, made it known ...
          Serbs are one of the closest Russian-related Slavic peoples.

          If you meet a Serb, a Croat, a Bosnian and a Slovene, it will be difficult for you to understand which of them is! They are so closely related to each other that they are the same for a foreigner. Their attitude towards Russia is really different. But it was formed in response to Russia's attitude towards them. If Russia supported one of them against the other, it is clear ... that the answer will be the same.
          The collapse of the USSR was organized by the same black forces that organized the destruction of the SFRY

          There is no doubt external influence and it is significant! But in the SFRY, there are so many unsolved problems! The structure of this state, stitched with white ropes, was unstable initially. As soon as he was pushed from the outside, the decay process acquired an irreversible character. It is a pity that this did not happen peacefully and so much Slavic blood was shed!
          1. Ingvar 72
            Ingvar 72 21 February 2018 17: 33
            +3
            Quote: pytar
            In the Yugoslav wars, everyone slaughtered everyone, as during WWII. The Balkan mentality, unfortunately, made it known ...

            Serbs slaughtered Ustasha ??? belay You dear, do not confuse the concept in places, everything and everyone cut the Serbs. Croats from the filing of the Catholic Church, Albanians and Bosnians from the filing of the Turks. Is there croatorez or albanoresis? No, there is ONLY a seros cutter. Teach the story. hi
            1. pytar
              pytar 21 February 2018 18: 20
              0
              Serbs slaughtered Ustasha ???

              Ustashy succeeded in this criminal case! Fact! But you confuse things! Ustashi - Croatian far-right nationalists! Their Serbian counterpart is the Serbian Chetniks of Drazh Mikhailovich and several other pro-Nazi groups. In general, during WWII, on the territory of Yugoslavia, everyone again fought among themselves! The communist partisans of Tito, for example, fight not according to ethnicity, but according to ideological principles! There are all kinds of nationalities in its formation! Yes, he is a Tito Croat himself! During the Yugoslav wars after the 90, there were also different paramilitary formations, and yes ... Serbian nationalists such as the "Tigers of the Arcana" and the like were especially noted! You need to listen to other parties to this conflict, not only the Serbs! You will learn about Croatian cutters and Bosnian cutters! Then, “advise” others to learn history! You do not know her! hi
              1. Ingvar 72
                Ingvar 72 21 February 2018 20: 03
                0
                Quote: pytar
                serbian chetniks

                They did not engage in massacres of civilians.
                Quote: pytar
                You will learn about Croatian cutters and Bosnian cutters!
                Can you give a link about the targeted destruction of civilians by the Serbs? And not isolated cases. but about similar actions by Croats and Albanians. hi
                1. pytar
                  pytar 21 February 2018 23: 32
                  0
                  They did not engage in massacres of civilians.

                  Since the Chetniks of Drazh Mikhailovich acted on the territory of Serbia. But the communists and leftists chopped. Tito fought against the Chetniks.
                  Can you give a link about the targeted destruction of civilians by the Serbs? And not isolated cases. but about similar actions by Croats and Albanians.

                  In WWII, Ustashi slaughtered Serbs, it is a fact. For some reason, for only 23 of cohabitation in KSKhS, Croats wildly hated the Serbs, despite the same language! During the first SE, the Serbs slaughtered the Bosnians, and in Vukovar the Croats. Look on YouTube. In Croatian and Albanian. About Bosnia / Srebrenica / is also in Russian. In the second SE, the Serbs did not stand on ceremony with the Albanians, but the Albanians from the Serbs in Kossovo. At the processes in The Hague, the crimes of Serbian criminals were proven / believe your case or not /, and Croatian and Albanian were marked. This is also true. So no one there is clean. Everything is in the blood.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 22 February 2018 13: 45
                    0
                    Quote: pytar
                    Croats wildly hated the Serbs, despite the same language!

                    The Huguenots were also of the same blood as the Catholics, but this did not stop the Catholics from cutting out 40000 Huguenots in one night. Maybe the problem is the Catholicism of the Croats? wink
                    1. pytar
                      pytar 22 February 2018 14: 19
                      0
                      The Huguenots were also of the same blood as the Catholics, but this did not stop the Catholics from cutting out 40000 Huguenots in one night. Maybe the problem is the Catholicism of the Croats?

                      There is logic in your discourse, but in the case of the Serbo-Croatian conflict, the situation is not that ... (similar to the Serbo-Bosnian and Serbo-Slovenian) I will give some examples!
                      1. Before the establishment of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (CXC) in 1918, where the 3 children were “united” (in addition, Macedonia was inhabited mainly by the Bulgarians), I can’t remember a single fact about war or conflict between the Serbs and the Croats! They even fought together against all external conquerors! It must be said that Croatian Catholicism, like Serbian Orthodoxy, is not dogmatic. Fanaticism among the Balkan peoples is generally weak. By the way, the Serbs were developing a plan to create a "Yugoslav state" since 1848, which meant that the accession of the Croatian and Bulgarian lands, but without Slovenes!
                      2. The conflict did not begin long after the creation of KSKhS (since 1929 the Kingdom of Yugoslavia)! Croats for centuries, being under the alien authority, were already under the dominance of the Serbs! Rules Serbian dynasty Karadzheorgievichah (translated from the tour. Kara-bloodshed - George - George)! By the way, Alexander I Karadzheorgievich (very odious figures) was killed by the Croats (with the participation of the Bulgarian BMRO) during an atentate in Marsilia in the 1934 of Serbs on the Bolkans, which were proverbial from their chauvinism, going to extremes! A certain violation of the rights of Croats existed. Great Serb chauvinism has become a catalyst for Croatian! Like later Kosovo. They are a response to the Serbian!
                      I must say that before the beginning of the 20th century, the main center of the idea of ​​PANSLAVISM was Croatia! Having entered the prickly embrace of the “Serbian brother”, the Croats sobered up very quickly! Like Bosnians and Slovenes among other things!
                      3: Everything that happened later is the result of the Serbs' frantic desire to create such a single Balkan empire! Yugoslavia did not pass a single serial test in its history! During WWII, it broke up like a cardboard kula in just 10 days! A country with 20-21 million population then! Germany lost just 127?!? killed! 90% of the hundreds of thousands of "Yugoslavs" killed during WWII are victims of inter-Yugoslav battles!
                      4. During titular Yugoslavia, intra-ethnic conflicts were extinguished, but there were them and they escalated! Whoever said anything, Serbian chauvinism did not go away and the Serbs dominated the SERU! After 90, the situation repeated itself! This says quite clearly how patchwork the idea of ​​Yugoslavia was! A state in which peoples who, although close, had their own rich history before that, were forcibly taken away!
                      1. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 22 February 2018 17: 18
                        +2
                        Quote: pytar
                        Karabloody - george - george)

                        So bloody? lol Do not tell - Kara from the Turkic black! wink
                        Quote: pytar
                        A certain violation of the rights of Croats existed.

                        A certain infringement will always be under the leadership of one people. But this is not a reason to cut. You know. I have familiar Serbs, moreover adults, and I draw testimonies not only on the Internet. hi
                    2. pytar
                      pytar 22 February 2018 18: 59
                      0
                      Kara from the Turkic black!

                      That's right! good I check carefully follow the correspondence! tongue
                      Although there probably is a reason to call them Bloody Georgievich, bearing in mind how this dynasty came to the throne in 1903! It happened in a barbaric way! The last Serbian king from the Obrenovic dynasty, Alexander I, together with his wife brutally chopped down with sabers and thrown out of the palace window, and the new king, Peter from the Karageorgievich dynasty, sat on the throne.
                      Here is how Russian journalist Vladimir Teplov described it: “The Serbs covered themselves not only with the shame of regicide, but also with their truly atrocious way of dealing with corpses. After Alexander and Draga fell, the killers continued to shoot at them and chop their corpses with sabers: they hit the King with six shots from a revolver and forty shots with a saber, and the Queen; sixty-three saber strikes and two revolving bullets. The Queen was almost all chopped up, her chest was cut off, her stomach was opened, her cheeks, her hands were cut too, the cuts between her fingers were especially large - probably the Queen grabbed her saber with her hands when they killed her. In addition, her body was covered with numerous bruises from being hit by officers' heels. I prefer not to talk about other abuses of the corpse of Draghi, to such an extent they are disgusting. When the assassins were full enough, they threw the corpses through the window into the garden, and the body of Draghi was completely naked. ”
                      A certain infringement will always be under the leadership of one people. But this is not a reason to cut.

                      To a certain level of infringement, yes ... and if the infringement becomes higher then ... they begin to cut into the Balkans ... In short, the supremacy of one people is not very desirable here.
                      I have familiar Serbs, moreover adults, and I draw testimonies not only on the Internet.

                      I have relatives in Serbia and I go there very often. As in almost all the republics of the former Yugoslavia. Recently I was in Prstina. My frank opinion: Kosovo will not be Serbia, in the foreseeable and even in the distant future. A new war will cause even more suffering and will not solve any problem! The only reasonable alternative is the entry of all these republics into the EU. Then there will be no borders, respectively, there will be no reason for wars. Everything will work out if external forces do not interfere playing on the contradictions between the Balkan peoples! We have a lot in common here at the Balkans and we can find a common peaceful creative path! It's time to leave wars in the past! drinks
                      1. Ingvar 72
                        Ingvar 72 22 February 2018 19: 21
                        +1
                        Quote: pytar
                        It happened in a barbaric way!

                        And when it was not barbaric, if the power passed to another dynasty (government) by force? Ceausescu was shot at random. request Nevertheless, the evidence of a journalist is not an argument for me - they never have faith. Inflate the facts to increase circulation.
                        Quote: pytar
                        The only reasonable alternative is the entry of all these republics into the EU.

                        I am tormented by vague doubts about the integrity of the EU in the coming 10-20 years.
                        Quote: pytar
                        We have a lot in common here at the Balkans and we can find a common peaceful creative path! It's time to leave wars in the past!

                        I sincerely wish you the same, although our desires are unlikely to come true. The Balkans are on the border of the interests of geopolitical powers, and often get on someone else's fight. request
                    3. pytar
                      pytar 22 February 2018 20: 08
                      +1
                      And when it was not barbaric, if the power passed to another dynasty (government) by force?

                      It's right... yes
                      Ceausescu was shot at random.

                      With dictators, it also happens.
                      Nevertheless, the evidence of a journalist is not an argument for me - they never have faith. Inflate the facts to increase circulation.

                      Yes, not one described the case. Though, who will believe in what, much depends on the ego of addiction.
                      I am tormented by vague doubts about the integrity of the EU in the coming 10-20 years.

                      Me too and not even vague! Despite the fact that this is the most successful project in the history of Europe itself, with all its ego flaws.
                      I sincerely wish you the same, although our desires are unlikely to come true.

                      Thanks Ingvar! I wish you and your loved ones health, peace and prosperity!
                      The Balkans are on the border of the interests of geopolitical powers, and often get on someone else's fight.

                      That is the whole problem! Conclusion: The policy of the great forces “divide and conquer” is disastrous for our peoples! All of us here, who have been living on the Balkans for centuries, must realize that conflict is the road to nowhere!
                2. pytar
                  pytar 22 February 2018 00: 27
                  0
                  Serbian propaganda in RuNet is totally dominant. Therefore, most Russians perceive Serbs as victims and know almost nothing about their atrocities. It’s a good idea, in my opinion, if that huge information would be translated and published in Russian, which also testifies to Serbian crimes against other nations. I probably naively believe that this is possible and will be useful.
                  Here are some links in Russian:



                  And Vukovar is the Croatian Stalingrad, which was selected by the 1400 Croatian defenders against more than 30 thousand regular Serbian army armed with tanks, artillery and aviation, as well as paramilitary Serb formations! ! I was there at the cemetery, several years after the war. A nightmare picture. I admit that until that time I was sympathetic to the Serbs, but after what I saw, I sharply changed my attitude. It is still not calculated how many civilians died during the capture of the city from the Serbs and after. The Serbs shot houses at point-blank range one after another, and after the capture of the city several thousand inhabitants disappeared who did not have time to escape in advance. 400 the wounded Croatian militias in the city hospital, which the Croats did not have time to withdraw, were stabbed to Serbs with knives up to one straight in their bunks. Here is a picture from the Croatian city of Vukovar, from that terrible time.
                  1. Ingvar 72
                    Ingvar 72 22 February 2018 13: 47
                    0
                    Quote: pytar
                    And Vukovar is the Croatian Stalingrad, which was selected by 1400 Croatian defenders against more than 30 thousand. The regular Serbian army armed with tanks

                    Can Chechens call the formidable Stalingrad the same? belay
                    1. pytar
                      pytar 23 February 2018 10: 42
                      0
                      Can Chechens call the formidable Stalingrad the same?

                      Probably they can. From their point of view, the situation probably looks different. They are not required to think like us. No one has a monopoly over the truth.
                      As for Vukovar, everything is clear! The city is located on the territory of Croatia, and this is not Serbia. For all the time of the first Yugoslav war, not a single Slovenian, Croatian or Bosnian soldier entered the territory of Serbia! Definitely eating Act on aggression from the side of Serbia in neighboring republics! You know ... now in Serbia they are starting to sober up and more and more often you can hear objective confessions about this period. About the destructive role of the Milosevic clique and the mistakes he made that led to the Yugoslav catastrophe.
    2. pytar
      pytar 21 February 2018 18: 50
      0
      The precedent was terrible

      They are terrible because many people died! In that sense, this is not a precedent. A large number of countries gained independence as a result of bloody wars.
      In the new history, the Kosovo "precedent" has relative analogues in the mind of the Transdniestrian, Abkhazian and South Ossetian republics. In addition, for example, Transnistria (Transdniestria) declared independence at 02.09.1990! This is 18 years before the independence of Kosovo (17.02.2008 g.)! The situation with Crimea is also largely correlated with Kossovskaya. The only difference is that some are “not ours”, while others are “ours”!
  2. nivander
    nivander 19 February 2018 08: 10
    +12
    and after all, in 1997, the Serbs suppressed the Albanian rebellion, the leaders of the Albanian separatists fled to large Albania and from there partisaned until, in January 1998, the Serbian special forces carried out a series of ferocious raids on the border regions of Albania, then the Serbs killed almost all of the Dushan’s chieftains. Then I caught two bullets and two dozen fragments - then German neurosurgeons then stitched it together and glued it together for a long time
  3. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 19 February 2018 08: 11
    +4
    The extra reason to make sure - the weak - will be torn. And they won’t ask anyone for permission ...
  4. cedar
    cedar 19 February 2018 08: 37
    +5
    ".. Thus, the puppet pseudo-state" Amerikosovo "is not only built on blood and lies, but also continues to rudely flout all conceivable and unthinkable human rights. Europe is silent. Silent States. Nothing to say. "
    States do not speak, but do. The largest US military base, Bondstyle, was created in Kosovo and continues to expand.
    See at the root, dear. All Europe America ...
    1. elenagromova
      19 February 2018 09: 03
      +3
      The base is being built, but they are silent about the violation of human rights.
      1. Reptiloid
        Reptiloid 19 February 2018 14: 49
        +2
        Speaking about Kosovo, one cannot fail to mention the “Ahtisaari plan.” This is the former president of Finland. Since November 2005, he has been a special envoy from the UN to Kosovo. Kosovo’s secession is contrary to the UN Charter, but it did. Assumptions about a bribe for Marty Ahtisaare from Kosovo separatists. And in 2008, in October, he became the Nobel Peace Prize laureate for this plan. Such a good peaceful company of laureates came from 3 former presidents ---- Soviet, Finnish and American .. All awards ---- for destruction.
  5. Aviator_
    Aviator_ 19 February 2018 08: 43
    +4
    [/ quote] in the form of bombs filled with depleted uranium [quote]
    Elena, depleted uranium in bombs is never used, because there is no need. Uranium has a high density and has an incendiary effect, so it is used in armor-piercing shells of aircraft guns, write more carefully.
    1. elenagromova
      19 February 2018 09: 02
      +5
      Study the question: http://www.sovsekretno.ru/articles/id/5328
    2. BAI
      BAI 19 February 2018 10: 10
      +2
      During the hostilities in Serbia, Macedonia, Montenegro and especially Kosovo (Operation 1999 “The Merciful Angel”), the Tomahawk cruise missiles were actively used. About 3 kg of depleted uranium is used in their warheads, 80% of which, when the target is hit, turns into an aerosol cloud, spreading up to a distance of 50 m from the affected object.

      Source: http://www.modernarmy.ru/article/473/boepripasi-s
      -obednennim-uranom © Portal "Modern Army"

      But in fact, its main use is armor-piercing shells of tanks.
      In the conduct of hostilities in Iraq, the U.S. armed forces used depleted uranium ammunition without restrictions. This was announced by the representative of the Pentagon, Michael E. Kilpatrick. He specified that these shells used A-10 and Harrier airplanes, Abrams M1A1 tanks, as well as Bradley infantry fighting vehicles. Depleted uranium shells are in service with the British Mk1 Challenger tanks. Such weapons were also developed by the French company Zhiat. Information on the availability of ammunition with uranium in Russian arsenals is contradictory. According to the Independent Military Review, the presence of such ammunition is not officially recognized, but it is not refuted either. A number of foreign sources at the same time report that some modifications of the 125-mm sub-caliber shells used by the T-72, T-80 and T-90 tanks contain depleted uranium.

      Source: http://www.modernarmy.ru/article/473/boepripasi-s
      -obednennim-uranom © Portal "Modern Army"
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 19 February 2018 22: 57
        0
        Of course, it is possible to put depleted uranium into Tomahawk, but the goals for such ammunition are completely unclear. Shoot the bunkers, perhaps, and that is not obvious. The original note said that depleted uranium was used in bombs, to which I noticed that this is not so, because again, it makes no sense. Tank guns can probably have such ammunition, but in Yugoslavia there were no tank battles with NATO forces.
        1. elenagromova
          20 February 2018 06: 57
          0
          Specially and did to cause the greatest possible damage. No wonder the Serbs have repeatedly tried to file a lawsuit against them. Serbian scientists are sounding the alarm that the incidence of cancer after these bombings has increased. Just because of depleted uranium.
          Well, yes, NATO members are so "good", could they not do that?
  6. Romka47
    Romka47 19 February 2018 09: 39
    +3
    Oh, Russia was rather weak then, now everything could have been different. It would be different!
    1. vadsonen
      vadsonen 19 February 2018 15: 56
      0
      An example of Territory U proves the opposite.
      1. Romka47
        Romka47 19 February 2018 16: 24
        +3
        If the war in the territory of U was fought at "that" time, the B-52 would have razed Strelkov to the ground in Slavyansk, the Russians would hang on pillars from Kharkov to Kerch, and we would at best make a march to the WCT.
  7. Comrade Kim
    Comrade Kim 19 February 2018 13: 10
    +4
    UN Security Council Resolution No. 1244
    There were a lot of such resolutions (which were later “forgotten” by the real rulers of the world).
    The UN does nothing, and cannot do it, if the Washington Regional Committee decides to play a little foolishly (by spilling rivers of blood, carrying out ethnic cleansing, taking out museum values ​​of countries with insufficient levels of democracy with cargo sides).
    The mechanism worked out very well:
    1. A territory with anything of value (hydrocarbons, geographical location, etc.) is declared to be a non-democratic regime governed by the co-opted Tyrant.
    2. The media show the bloodied corpses of civilians.
    3. Well-trained public organizations (social networks, rallies) enter the game.
    4. UN declares the integrity of this country, and the inadmissibility of solving the problem by military means.
    5. The United States, or their faithful dogs, England or France (as in Libya) are destroying the peaceful infrastructure of this "TOTAL" country.
    6. Everyone is happy: the Americans got resources that are well guarded by PMCs, UN "did everything he could,"
    the population of the territory trodden from the Middle Ages now lives on democratic principles.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  8. gorenina91
    gorenina91 19 February 2018 15: 07
    0
    - In Kosovo, probably there are no Serbs left at all ...
    1. elenagromova
      19 February 2018 15: 25
      +1
      Left ... living in enclaves ... As in a besieged fortress
    2. pytar
      pytar 21 February 2018 12: 42
      0
      - In Kosovo, probably there are no Serbs left at all ...

      Previously, there were about 5%. Now it is not more than 1% and then mostly elderly people. According to the state of natural decline, in the next few years, they "stand still".
      1. elenagromova
        21 February 2018 13: 16
        0
        Are you satisfied with this? This is essentially a genocide.
        1. pytar
          pytar 21 February 2018 13: 43
          0
          Are you satisfied with this? This is essentially a genocide.

          Of course not! I am just stating a fact! Moreover, from the first person, since recently I was in Pristina!
          Definitions may be different, but in fact the situation arose due to the demographic problem of the Serbs as a whole. Albanians, and in particular Kosovars, have the highest birth rate in Europe! Already in Serbia itself there are regions where Albanians are becoming the majority! You will forgive the expressions, but the Serbs themselves say that the Albanian (i) defeated the Serbian ... If one people ceases to reproduce, then the ego will quickly take another place, the more fertile people.
  9. prosto_rgb
    prosto_rgb 19 February 2018 19: 25
    +2
    I well remember the 1999 news, where the withdrawal of Yugoslav troops from Kosovo is presented almost as the main geopolitical victory of Russia in the Balkans.
    But what about - Chernomyrdin agreed. Now everything will be new and the conflict will be resolved in many ways. Urra comrades !!!
    Here is amerikosovo.
    I also remember how Zhirinovsky and Paria voted for Yeltsin’s impeachment.
  10. pytar
    pytar 21 February 2018 12: 51
    0
    The principle of the territorial integrity of the European state is “safely” forgotten.

    It is interesting how the author relates to the same question regarding the first Yugoslav war, when the "Yugoslavs" (essentially Serbs) wanted to bite off significant territories from Croatia and BiH ... Territories that did not have any special status in the former Yugoslavia and representing parts of these Republics , for the difference from Kossovo, which had the status of an autonomous region.
    1. elenagromova
      21 February 2018 13: 16
      0
      I have a negative attitude towards the collapse of Yugoslavia under the influence of external forces. This is where the true root of the problem lies, not the false accusations against the Serbs
      1. pytar
        pytar 21 February 2018 13: 53
        0
        I take your opinion for mixing, but I respect the opinions of the peoples of the former Yugoslavia more. According to all opinion polls, none of them regrets the breakup! And the referendums were held and did not want to be under Serbia anymore! They only regret that everything happened with blood!
        Accusations against the Serbs are justified. Serbian chauvinism is a proverb on the Balkans! There are also grounds for accusation against those who, in other republics, have taken the path of nationalism. In fact, the ruling clans in all the former republics were the same. The difference is that the Serbs were the first to start the war. For the first time, in BiH they even tended to remain part of Yugoslavia, but the ultimatams from Belgrade provoked a response from Sarajevo. If you are not lazy and you understand Serbo-Croatian, you can find the meetings of the Bosnian parliament on YouTube when Karadzic came to him to threaten the Bosnians! For some reason, only Serbian publishers are being translated into Russian! Partiality is obvious!
      2. bane's jacket
        bane's jacket 21 February 2018 20: 39
        +1
        Quote: elenagromova
        ... and not false accusations against the Serbs

        "Poor, poor" Serbs ...

        Tell someone in the photo or the famous photo of Ron Haviv seen?
        1. pytar
          pytar 21 February 2018 23: 53
          +1
          "Tigers of the Arcana (Zhelko Razhnyatovich)"! Creepy thugs! On April 2 1992, the legendary photojournalist Ron Haviv photographed how Surjan Golubovich from the paramilitary Tigers kicked the head of the town of Bjelina / BiH / Tifa Shabanovich, who had been killed on the sidewalk. When attacking this Bosnian city, in less than an hour, the Arkanians shot and killed 48 civilians in the streets. In general, in the city, these Serbian "heroes" killed 1400 people., And 10 000 Bosnians - the inhabitants of the city were expelled, literally in a few days.
          Like hundreds of other war criminals, Golubovich, after the end of the war, takes off his uniform and “begins a new life”. Almost 15 years working as a DJ in Serbia. Under the pseudonym "Max DJ Max", Sardzhan Golubovic turns into one of the veterans of electronic music in the nightclubs of Belgrade. The ego is imprisoned for drug trafficking.
          1. bane's jacket
            bane's jacket 22 February 2018 06: 34
            +1
            Quote: pytar
            "Tigers of the Arcana (Zhelko Razhnyatovich)"! Creepy thugs!

            Yes. It’s all the more ridiculous to read for example such