Pyongyang demonstrated a new gun-grenade launcher and rocket launcher

February 14 2018 38

At the recent "pre-Olympic" military parade in Pyongyang, rocket systems became the heroes of most publications in the media. Less was written about armored vehicles and artillery, writes Messenger of Mordovia.

Pyongyang demonstrated a new gun-grenade launcher and rocket launcher

The new 122-mm self-propelled artillery installation, which is known in the West and in South Korea as the M199, remained virtually unnoticed by journalists.

“On the new modification of this self-propelled guns we see a friend already by tank "Songun-915" mounted for self-defense, a remote-controlled module with two automatic grenade launchers. Also mounted on the tower are containers of a portable anti-aircraft missile system. Mortars appeared to shoot smoke grenades, ”writes the author of the publication Dmitry Lemeshko.

According to some military experts, the DPRK is not lacking in guided anti-tank complexes, but it is nonetheless in no hurry to abandon anti-tank artillery, one of the models of which is the M1991.

“Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Mountain shooter

+5

14 February 2018 15: 35

No need to move self-propelled guns in the forehead on the tanks. And from an ambush - a dangerous thing.
1. ul_vitalii
  
  +7
  
  14 February 2018 15: 39
  
  On prepared positions in the defense is very good.
2. Safevi
  
  +4
  
  14 February 2018 15: 51
  
  It is unlikely that the war in Korea will be contact. Aviation, missiles and long-range artillery is what the ball will rule. Although I doubt that there will be a war at all. The South will simply swallow the North bloodlessly, by the hands of the northerners themselves
  1. vlad66
    
    +14
    
    14 February 2018 16: 08
    
    Quote: sefevi
    The South will simply swallow the North bloodlessly, by the hands of the northerners themselves
    
    Yeah, yeah, at first the northerners will sweep away Seoul even without missiles, and then they will scatter and devour themselves with their own hands. Well, dreams are dreams.
    1. bouncyhunter
      
      +2
      
      14 February 2018 16: 19
      
      Another provocateur and defender of the Amerz shit democracy.
  2. Alf
    
    +1
    
    14 February 2018 21: 06
    
    Quote: sefevi
    It is unlikely that the war in Korea will be contact. Aviation, missiles and long-range artillery is what the ball will rule.
    
    In an open area. But in the mountains, and they are in the UK before a fig, there is not much hope for aviation and missiles.
  3. zivXP
    
    0
    
    14 February 2018 21: 38
    
    Yes, the Americans are simply committing hidden genocide to North Koreans. Type themselves will die out. It’s time to take the trump to the Hague tribunal.
    1. Sling cutter
      
      +3
      
      14 February 2018 21: 42
      
      Quote: zivXP
      Yes, the Americans are simply committing hidden genocide to North Koreans. Type themselves will die out. It’s time to take the trump to the Hague tribunal.
      
      So we all his country three months in a row, day and night, he was chosen.
      Already Deripaska with foolishly fussed
      and now from the trump there is an indulgence to “spies”, there is a list, but no sanctions! They said to Vova and Ko, sit quietly - do not touch
AlexKP

+3

14 February 2018 15: 36

They cut them on the "heliks", and they say they live poorly.
1. MadCat
  
  0
  
  14 February 2018 15: 53
  
  Quote: AlexKP
  They cut them on the "heliks", and they say they live poorly.
  
  no, it's kind of a chinese clone of gelika.
2. Black_Vatnik
  
  +1
  
  14 February 2018 16: 03
  
  In the center of Pyongyang, knowledgeable people talk, and Maybakhs stand.
bazzbazz

+3

14 February 2018 15: 46

Where do lovers say that the DPRK is the bottom? ) We are waiting for unique comments from you!)

Good luck to the DPRK in the confrontation with the United States!
PS Most likely, this is not Gelika, but only copies, basically only similar in appearance.
1. Piramidon
  
  +5
  
  14 February 2018 16: 51
  Quote: bazzbazz
  Most likely, these are not Geliki, but only copies, basically only similar in appearance.
  
  Type of ours
Kars

+3

14 February 2018 15: 55

Most likely a purely ceremonial option.
Although the air defense system may come in handy.
Bomb

+4

14 February 2018 16: 06

I was more interested in the MLRS in the background.
assa67

+5

14 February 2018 16: 11

they didn’t even plan a ground operation .. the springboard already announced the concept of a war with North Korea ... massive missile attacks from aircraft carriers and submarines ...
1. Conserp
  
  +1
  
  14 February 2018 16: 21
  
  North Korea actually has RCC.
  Against which the American aircraft carriers are completely defenseless (according to the US Navy's own estimates).
  1. assa67
    
    +3
    
    14 February 2018 16: 32
    
    Quote: Conserp
    Against which the American aircraft carriers are completely defenseless (according to the US Navy's own estimates).
    
    it was the opinion of one expert who was immediately shut up ... the mattresses are confident in their security and impunity, naive ... I emphasize OWN ... they do not care about the allies
    1. Conserp
      
      +2
      
      14 February 2018 17: 58
      
      This is not “the opinion of one expert” - this is the result of a large-scale special research conducted in 2008-2010, in which the latest at that time Ronald Reagan and several other ships participated. The results are secret, but the failure was too epic to hide.
      
      American radars were unable to normally see low-altitude targets, and all three types of missiles (SM-6, ESSM, RAM) - to intercept them.
      1. assa67
        
        +4
        
        14 February 2018 18: 05
        
        but they didn’t abandon the “remote” strike strategy ... the ground operation is similar to death for them ...
Imh

+2

14 February 2018 16: 39

From the BGM-109 Tomahawk will not help, however.
1. ALEA IACTA EST
  
  0
  
  14 February 2018 17: 43
  
  Can spoil the southerners.
  1. Imh
    
    0
    
    14 February 2018 18: 21
    
    It's right. By peaceful nas.points pull.
Imh

+1

14 February 2018 16: 53

The topic is almost an hour, and there are also 20 comments, Israel is felts. After that, it’s hard to argue with the fact that Israel is the Center for Peace.
1. tank66
  
  +1
  
  14 February 2018 17: 45
  
  Oh, wei. If only not for the center of the geo-target. And then, I, in the Urals, planting potatoes, I can not drive away the thought: you have no Colorado potato beetle.
2. tagil
  
  +2
  
  14 February 2018 17: 58
  
  Tolley case about Israel, as soon as all the Jews from the site to defend themselves flee. Are you all from one "office" or telling each other about an article?
  1. Imh
    
    0
    
    14 February 2018 18: 22
    
    We are all from the Mossad
    1. tagil
      
      +1
      
      14 February 2018 19: 06
      
      Mossad does not deal with such a trifle, for this you have another "office". Well, in general, it’s not far gone.
ALEA IACTA EST

0

14 February 2018 17: 37

Modification with the complex "Point" so far decided not to show.
Lopatov

+1

14 February 2018 18: 33

And on what grounds did this self-propelled guns be attributed to anti-tank? She doesn't even have a direct aim ...
Old26

+5

14 February 2018 19: 10
Quote: Mountain Shooter
No need to move self-propelled guns in the forehead on the tanks. And from an ambush - a dangerous thing.

In fact, it is difficult to call an anti-tank installation based on the D-74 artillery system. For Koreans, it was always considered just an SPG, not an anti-tank

Quote: vlad66
Yeah yeah, first the northerners will sweep away Seoul and even without rockets

Yes, stop carrying the blizzard again. Already 20 times have been discussed how they will “sweep away” Seoul. No. Every time someone starts to carry this nonsense again

Quote: Conserp
North Korea actually has RCC.

There is. the main part with a range of 40-60 km. There are some with a range of 250 km. Subsonic. Do you really think Americans are so stupid that they will go into the coverage area of the RCC

Quote: Bomb
I was more interested in the MLRS in the background.

Which one? The one on the left or in the center? If left, then this is a 240 mm MLRS, if in the center - 300 mm

240 mm MLRS

True, in the top photo they are with red pipe caps

300 mm MLRS. They are known 3 options

The very first one was shown first in the parade. The second option in an armored cabin. The third option (photos 3 and 4) - instead of round - square containers. In the west it is known as MLRS KN-09
82т11

0

14 February 2018 19: 54

SPGs are not needed in modern warfare? Damn how to express culturally (
The author is better not to write anything!
82т11

0

14 February 2018 19: 57

SPGs are not needed in modern warfare? Damn how to express culturally (
The author is better not to write anything!
JD1979

+1

14 February 2018 20: 58

“Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.

hmm .. if this is an anachronism, then what is the name for the non-self-propelled Rapier?
Old26

+1

15 February 2018 00: 14
Quote: JD1979
“Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.

hmm .. if this is an anachronism, then what is the name for the non-self-propelled Rapier?

But such an anti-tank gun?

or
M. Michelson

0

15 February 2018 07: 17

So, we must try not to bring the battle to a "modern battle".
Evgeny Strygin

0

15 February 2018 10: 44

damn I love Asian specifics) manifests itself in everything)
MOSKVITYANIN

0

23 February 2018 22: 06

"Although it is obvious that self-propelled guns with relatively weak reservations are currently an anachronism

And that hinged armor has already been canceled?