Military Review

Pyongyang demonstrated a new gun-grenade launcher and rocket launcher

38
At the recent "pre-Olympic" military parade in Pyongyang, rocket systems became the heroes of most publications in the media. Less was written about armored vehicles and artillery, writes Messenger of Mordovia.


Pyongyang demonstrated a new gun-grenade launcher and rocket launcher


The new 122-mm self-propelled artillery installation, which is known in the West and in South Korea as the M199, remained virtually unnoticed by journalists.



“On the new modification of this self-propelled guns we see a friend already by tank "Songun-915" mounted for self-defense, a remote-controlled module with two automatic grenade launchers. Also mounted on the tower are containers of a portable anti-aircraft missile system. Mortars appeared to shoot smoke grenades, ”writes the author of the publication Dmitry Lemeshko.



According to some military experts, the DPRK is not lacking in guided anti-tank complexes, but it is nonetheless in no hurry to abandon anti-tank artillery, one of the models of which is the M1991.

“Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.
Photos used:
imp-navigator.livejournal.com
38 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 14 February 2018 15: 35
    +5
    No need to move self-propelled guns in the forehead on the tanks. And from an ambush - a dangerous thing.
    1. ul_vitalii
      ul_vitalii 14 February 2018 15: 39
      +7
      On prepared positions in the defense is very good.
    2. Safevi
      Safevi 14 February 2018 15: 51
      +4
      It is unlikely that the war in Korea will be contact. Aviation, missiles and long-range artillery is what the ball will rule. Although I doubt that there will be a war at all. The South will simply swallow the North bloodlessly, by the hands of the northerners themselves
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 14 February 2018 16: 08
        +14
        Quote: sefevi
        The South will simply swallow the North bloodlessly, by the hands of the northerners themselves

        Yeah, yeah, at first the northerners will sweep away Seoul even without missiles, and then they will scatter and devour themselves with their own hands. Well, dreams are dreams. laughing
        1. bouncyhunter
          bouncyhunter 14 February 2018 16: 19
          +2
          Another provocateur and defender of the Amerz shit democracy. wink
      2. Alf
        Alf 14 February 2018 21: 06
        +1
        Quote: sefevi
        It is unlikely that the war in Korea will be contact. Aviation, missiles and long-range artillery is what the ball will rule.

        In an open area. But in the mountains, and they are in the UK before a fig, there is not much hope for aviation and missiles.
      3. zivXP
        zivXP 14 February 2018 21: 38
        0
        Yes, the Americans are simply committing hidden genocide to North Koreans. Type themselves will die out. It’s time to take the trump to the Hague tribunal.
        1. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 14 February 2018 21: 42
          +3
          Quote: zivXP
          Yes, the Americans are simply committing hidden genocide to North Koreans. Type themselves will die out. It’s time to take the trump to the Hague tribunal.

          So we all his country three months in a row, day and night, he was chosen.
          Already Deripaska with foolishly fussed belay
          and now from the trump there is an indulgence to “spies”, there is a list, but no sanctions! They said to Vova and Ko, sit quietly - do not touch wink
  2. AlexKP
    AlexKP 14 February 2018 15: 36
    +3
    They cut them on the "heliks", and they say they live poorly.
    1. MadCat
      MadCat 14 February 2018 15: 53
      0
      Quote: AlexKP
      They cut them on the "heliks", and they say they live poorly.

      no, it's kind of a chinese clone of gelika.
    2. Black_Vatnik
      Black_Vatnik 14 February 2018 16: 03
      +1
      In the center of Pyongyang, knowledgeable people talk, and Maybakhs stand.
  3. bazzbazz
    bazzbazz 14 February 2018 15: 46
    +3
    Where do lovers say that the DPRK is the bottom? ) We are waiting for unique comments from you!)

    Good luck to the DPRK in the confrontation with the United States!
    PS Most likely, this is not Gelika, but only copies, basically only similar in appearance.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 14 February 2018 16: 51
      +5
      Quote: bazzbazz
      Most likely, these are not Geliki, but only copies, basically only similar in appearance.

      Type of ours good
  4. Kars
    Kars 14 February 2018 15: 55
    +3
    Most likely a purely ceremonial option.
    Although the air defense system may come in handy.
  5. Bomb
    Bomb 14 February 2018 16: 06
    +4
    I was more interested in the MLRS in the background.
  6. assa67
    assa67 14 February 2018 16: 11
    +5
    they didn’t even plan a ground operation .. the springboard already announced the concept of a war with North Korea ... massive missile attacks from aircraft carriers and submarines ...
    1. Conserp
      Conserp 14 February 2018 16: 21
      +1
      North Korea actually has RCC.
      Against which the American aircraft carriers are completely defenseless (according to the US Navy's own estimates).
      1. assa67
        assa67 14 February 2018 16: 32
        +3
        Quote: Conserp
        Against which the American aircraft carriers are completely defenseless (according to the US Navy's own estimates).

        it was the opinion of one expert who was immediately shut up ... the mattresses are confident in their security and impunity, naive ... I emphasize OWN ... they do not care about the allies
        1. Conserp
          Conserp 14 February 2018 17: 58
          +2
          This is not “the opinion of one expert” - this is the result of a large-scale special research conducted in 2008-2010, in which the latest at that time Ronald Reagan and several other ships participated. The results are secret, but the failure was too epic to hide.

          American radars were unable to normally see low-altitude targets, and all three types of missiles (SM-6, ESSM, RAM) - to intercept them.
          1. assa67
            assa67 14 February 2018 18: 05
            +4
            but they didn’t abandon the “remote” strike strategy ... the ground operation is similar to death for them ...
  7. Imh
    Imh 14 February 2018 16: 39
    +2
    From the BGM-109 Tomahawk will not help, however.
    1. ALEA IACTA EST
      ALEA IACTA EST 14 February 2018 17: 43
      0
      Can spoil the southerners.
      1. Imh
        Imh 14 February 2018 18: 21
        0
        It's right. By peaceful nas.points pull.
  8. Imh
    Imh 14 February 2018 16: 53
    +1
    The topic is almost an hour, and there are also 20 comments, Israel is felts. After that, it’s hard to argue with the fact that Israel is the Center for Peace. good
    1. tank66
      tank66 14 February 2018 17: 45
      +1
      Oh, wei. If only not for the center of the geo-target. And then, I, in the Urals, planting potatoes, I can not drive away the thought: you have no Colorado potato beetle.
    2. tagil
      tagil 14 February 2018 17: 58
      +2
      Tolley case about Israel, as soon as all the Jews from the site to defend themselves flee. Are you all from one "office" or telling each other about an article?
      1. Imh
        Imh 14 February 2018 18: 22
        0
        We are all from the Mossad
        1. tagil
          tagil 14 February 2018 19: 06
          +1
          Mossad does not deal with such a trifle, for this you have another "office". Well, in general, it’s not far gone.
  9. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 14 February 2018 17: 37
    0
    Modification with the complex "Point" so far decided not to show.
  10. Lopatov
    Lopatov 14 February 2018 18: 33
    +1
    And on what grounds did this self-propelled guns be attributed to anti-tank? She doesn't even have a direct aim ...
  11. Old26
    Old26 14 February 2018 19: 10
    +5
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    No need to move self-propelled guns in the forehead on the tanks. And from an ambush - a dangerous thing.

    In fact, it is difficult to call an anti-tank installation based on the D-74 artillery system. For Koreans, it was always considered just an SPG, not an anti-tank

    Quote: vlad66
    Yeah yeah, first the northerners will sweep away Seoul and even without rockets

    Yes, stop carrying the blizzard again. Already 20 times have been discussed how they will “sweep away” Seoul. No. Every time someone starts to carry this nonsense again

    Quote: Conserp
    North Korea actually has RCC.

    There is. the main part with a range of 40-60 km. There are some with a range of 250 km. Subsonic. Do you really think Americans are so stupid that they will go into the coverage area of ​​the RCC

    Quote: Bomb
    I was more interested in the MLRS in the background.

    Which one? The one on the left or in the center? If left, then this is a 240 mm MLRS, if in the center - 300 mm

    240 mm MLRS


    True, in the top photo they are with red pipe caps

    300 mm MLRS. They are known 3 options




    The very first one was shown first in the parade. The second option in an armored cabin. The third option (photos 3 and 4) - instead of round - square containers. In the west it is known as MLRS KN-09
  12. 82т11
    82т11 14 February 2018 19: 54
    0
    SPGs are not needed in modern warfare? Damn how to express culturally (
    The author is better not to write anything!
  13. 82т11
    82т11 14 February 2018 19: 57
    0
    SPGs are not needed in modern warfare? Damn how to express culturally (
    The author is better not to write anything!
  14. JD1979
    JD1979 14 February 2018 20: 58
    +1
    “Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.

    hmm .. if this is an anachronism, then what is the name for the non-self-propelled Rapier?
  15. Old26
    Old26 15 February 2018 00: 14
    +1
    Quote: JD1979
    “Although it is obvious that a self-propelled gun with a relatively weak booking is currently an anachronism and, even with the presence of such a“ modernization ”package, it is doomed in modern combat,” the author concludes.

    hmm .. if this is an anachronism, then what is the name for the non-self-propelled Rapier?

    But such an anti-tank gun?

    or
  16. M. Michelson
    M. Michelson 15 February 2018 07: 17
    0
    So, we must try not to bring the battle to a "modern battle".
  17. Evgeny Strygin
    Evgeny Strygin 15 February 2018 10: 44
    0
    damn I love Asian specifics) manifests itself in everything)
  18. MOSKVITYANIN
    MOSKVITYANIN 23 February 2018 22: 06
    0
    "Although it is obvious that self-propelled guns with relatively weak reservations are currently an anachronism

    And that hinged armor has already been canceled?