The Pentagon told what they spend budget money

34
In the 2019 fiscal year, the US Army planned to spend $ 686 billion for its needs. The portal defensenews.com published excerpts from a budget request, which shows the amount of equipment that the US Department of Defense intends to purchase.

The Pentagon told what they spend budget money




In the request for 2019 fiscal year, which will begin on October 1 2018, the US military included a large number of new ammunition, indicating that the stocks were used in the fight against terrorists in the Middle East. In addition, several dozens of new fighters appear in the document, since the existing ones "worn out during operations in Iraq and Syria." Among other things in the new budget included:

$ 10,7 billion for the purchase of X-NUMX fighter F-77;
$ 2 billion on the 24 F / A-18 Super Hornet fighter;
$ 3 billion on 12 tankers KC-46 Pegasus;
$ 1,2 billion on 43 594 JDAM kits (convert free-fall bombs to adjustable);
$ 2 billion on 5113 armored JLTV SUVs;
$ 7,4 billion on 2 submarines like Virginia;
$ 6 billion on 3 destroyer type Arleigh Burke;
$ 2,3 billion on the development of the program of new strategic bomber B-21 Raider;
$ 1,3 billion for the purchase of XHUMX attack helicopters AH-60E Apache;
$ 2,2 billion on 10 anti-submarine aircraft P-8 Poseidon;
$ 1,6 billion on X-NUMX helicopters CH-8K King Stallion;
$ 2,7 billion for modernization tanks M-1 Abrams.

Defense spending in the United States has grown since 2000 and peaked in 2010 ($ 698 billion). Today, the US military budget is the largest in the world and accounts for more than a third of global defense spending. In addition, the country is the world's largest arms supplier, "Warspot"
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mwg
    +2
    13 February 2018 18: 07
    Yes, we already know what they will spend on cocaine and women with low social responsibility, and what remains will go to the fathers of the money.
  2. +4
    13 February 2018 18: 08
    $ 6 billion on 3 destroyer type Arleigh Burke;
    2 lard per serial burke. Have they risen in price?
    1. +7
      13 February 2018 18: 12
      Of course, the numbers are impressive. But I have more respect for the RF Ministry of Defense, when they achieve decent results for amounts ten times less
      1. +6
        13 February 2018 18: 14
        when they are tens of times less for amounts, they achieve decent results
        There is no money, but we are getting stronger .. laughing Do you want to live, be able to spin laughing
        1. +3
          13 February 2018 18: 18
          That is why all the invaders are not so "easy" with Russia
          1. +6
            13 February 2018 18: 21
            so "not easy" with Russia
            And the best European "experts" have repeatedly confirmed this.
            1. +4
              13 February 2018 18: 23
              Quote: KVU-NSVD
              And the best European "experts" have repeatedly confirmed this.

              Rest in peace to them and all that
      2. 0
        14 February 2018 02: 01
        Quote: Chertt
        Of course, the numbers are impressive. But I have more respect for the RF Ministry of Defense, when they achieve decent results for amounts ten times less

        that's why you shouldn't believe in fairy tales that amerikossy get salary much more and live much curlier than us !! request wassat wassat laughing laughing laughing
    2. +3
      13 February 2018 20: 11
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      2 lard per serial burke. Have they risen in price?

      Inflation has also affected them, plus new weapons systems whose cost is growing exponentially. On average, a building costs 500 million BIUS Aegis approximately 300 million, for just one 2,2 billion. although planned 1,7 billion. 500 lam drank good feel
      link
  3. +1
    13 February 2018 18: 14
    JDAM is a good weapon .. Unfortunately we don’t have anything like it yet. And it’s not expected ...
    1. +6
      13 February 2018 18: 24
      Unfortunately, we have nothing like this yet
      We use Hephaestus on the sly. Both cheap and effective winked
    2. +4
      13 February 2018 18: 36
      JDAM is a good weapon.

      Good, I do not argue, but with whom to fight? With us? Such an arsenal is good to frighten Eun .... A thermonuclear charge with cobalt -59. And everything becomes perishable ....... what
    3. +6
      13 February 2018 19: 05
      Quote: Magic Archer
      Unfortunately, we do not have anything like this yet, and it is not expected ..

      Definitely not foreseen?
      The KAB-500S corrected aerial bomb with an inertial-satellite guidance system will allow at a qualitatively new level, at any time of the day and in any weather conditions, to solve the problem of hitting a wide class of targets.
      For the first time, the mass-dimensional model of the Russian KAB-500S corrected aviation bomb was demonstrated to the general public in 2003 during the MAKS International Air Show. KAB-500S - the Russian analogue of JDAM - belongs to the category of "smart" bombs. It is designed to engage stationary ground and surface targets such as warehouses, bunkers, protected command posts, various types of military-industrial facilities, as well as warships and ships docked at naval bases. The KAB-500S will be used as part of the armament of modern combat aircraft systems in the altitude range from 500 m to 10 km at a carrier speed of 550-1100 km / h. The warhead is high-explosive concrete-piercing, allowing to hit highly protected targets. Fuse - contact with three types of deceleration. KVO 5-10 m.
      The basis of the guidance system KAB-500S is a specialized 24-channel receiver-indicator of satellite navigation systems (SNS) "GLONASS" / "Navstar" PSN-2001, developed by the Moscow design bureau "Compass". The PSN-2001 uses modern electronic technologies and the latest algorithms for digital processing of navigation signals from SNS. OJSC "MKB" Compass "is known as the leading manufacturer in Russia of automatic aviation radio compasses, navigation systems of short and medium range, receivers of satellite navigation systems. Note that the modern technological level of MKB" Compass "(the enterprise has a system of computer-aided design of radio electronic equipment using CMOS technologies, VLSI and programmable logic integrated circuits) allows you to solve problems of any complexity.


      KAB-500S (guidance by GLONASS) .High-explosive warhead. Despite the initial reports about the abandonment of bombs due to their high cost (the price of KAB-500S is 3 million rubles) and the absence of reports in the press about its adoption, KAB-500S appears in the video chronicle and official statements of the Russian Ministry of Defense from Syria
  4. +6
    13 February 2018 18: 18
    F-35 looks interesting in a row with 4 generation machines.
    1. +1
      13 February 2018 18: 24
      laughing... What kind of song is so dashing? ..What is he singing about?
      1. +5
        13 February 2018 20: 18
        Quote: san4es
        What kind of song is so dashing? ..What is he singing about?

        Israel Air Force Anthem On silver wings
        Who is interested in translation here
    2. +2
      13 February 2018 18: 26
      The song is very similar to Soviet, of the seventies-eighties good
      1. +1
        13 February 2018 19: 16
        So they were written by Soviet composers, Jewish songs. )
        Didn't you know?)
        1. +4
          13 February 2018 21: 48
          Quote: Alexey Sommer
          So they were written by Soviet composers, Jewish songs. )

          The Aviators' March, which is the anthem of the Russian Air Force, was written in 1920. Music by Yuli Abramovich Khait, lyrics by Pavel Davidovich German
      2. +2
        13 February 2018 20: 51
        Quote: Chertt
        The song is very similar to Soviet, of the seventies-eighties good

        ...That's for sure soldier
  5. 0
    13 February 2018 18: 18
    well when you have a "world printing press ..."
  6. +2
    13 February 2018 18: 24
    JLTV armored SUVs;

    1. +1
      13 February 2018 18: 39
      The technique is good, and the performance characteristics are decent. But $ 400 per piece. Little ?
      1. 0
        14 February 2018 01: 07
        Typhoon U - 60 million rubles apiece - isn't it a lot.
        1. +1
          14 February 2018 02: 18
          Quote: Vadim237
          Typhoon U - 60 million rubles apiece - isn't it a lot.


          firstly, no need to whistle about 60 lyamas !!! fool fool laughing laughing secondly, you often compare "trucks" with "cars" on an equal footing ??? what belay wassat lol lol lol
  7. +3
    13 February 2018 18: 28
    Quote: Chertt
    Of course, the numbers are impressive. But I have more respect for the RF Ministry of Defense, when they achieve decent results for amounts ten times less

    Yes, that the Americans still spank green candy wrappers! But what will this lead to? The budgetary debt is already huge! recourse wink
  8. +2
    13 February 2018 18: 30
    Quote: taiga2018
    well when you have a "world printing press ..."

    Or maybe it's bad! wink
    1. 0
      14 February 2018 02: 22
      Quote: Simon
      Quote: taiga2018
      well when you have a "world printing press ..."

      Or maybe it's bad! wink

      while we can guess the current !!! what laughing laughing laughing
  9. +2
    13 February 2018 18: 56
    Trump will bring their budget to a trillion! This will be the most important and memorable event in the United States - the army has so much money that the army bought a thousand tons of Swarovski crystals, and pasted them all over the new military equipment! wassat
  10. +2
    13 February 2018 19: 56
    And I did not find a line on the list about the purchase of diapers! Mess.
  11. +1
    13 February 2018 21: 19
    In terms of the procurement of flying tankers, JDAM kits, submarines, destroyers and UAV aircraft, we can only envy. request
    1. +4
      13 February 2018 22: 33
      Quote: lexus
      In terms of the procurement of flying tankers, JDAM kits, submarines, destroyers and UAV aircraft, we can only envy.

      It’s possible, but we must understand that they and I have absolutely opposite military-strategic and geopolitical tasks and goals. I do not like the term national interests, because bourgeois governments simply do not have them and we simply do not.
      1. 0
        13 February 2018 22: 46
        we and them have absolutely opposite military-strategic and geopolitical tasks and goals.

        Yes, JDAMs are clearly not going to be written off. Although, the use of such bombs, for example, could have avoided the loss of the Su-25 and the death of the pilot.
        I do not like the term national interests, because bourgeois governments simply do not have them and we simply do not.

        You are right, Colleague! As they say, business and nothing personal. hi
  12. 0
    14 February 2018 06: 58
    Russian taxpayers are outraged by such a cut and demand to cut together! laughing