Radar "Voronezh-DM" near Murmansk will be built by 2020

49
The new radar station, which will provide aerospace control over the Arctic, will be built by 2020 year, said the head of the board of directors of the defense holding "RTI", chief designer of the missile attack warning system (SPRN) Sergey Boev.

The works are going according to the approved schedule, there are no problems. We had a plan - by 2020, we should do everything
- he said.



Radar "Voronezh-DM" near Murmansk will be built by 2020


The new Voronezh-DM radar will operate near Murmansk on a mountain at an altitude of more than 400 meters above sea level. The radar will be several times more powerful than all the radars already created and under construction.

This station is a fundamentally new technical level, with more serious characteristics. It contains all of our recent achievements, all the latest technologies that have been achieved in the framework of our entire large cooperation, including in the field of element base.
- reported Boev

The radar station near Murmansk will provide radar control of the aerospace space over the Arctic and the main missile-dangerous areas.

The new Voronezh-DM will replace the outdated radar station Dnepr in the north of the country, Interfax-AVN reports.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 February 2018 15: 01
    Early warning radar is a necessary thing. It would be nice to create several belts with such radars with us, so that they can replace and overlap the control areas of each other.
    1. +4
      10 February 2018 15: 06
      That's fine, now we need to maintain the construction schedule, which, obviously, will be so, because the previous radars were built by the scheduled date.
      1. +3
        10 February 2018 15: 22
        Quote: Thought Giant
        the previous radars were built by the scheduled date.

        The chip is in its high degree of factory readiness and modularity. Therefore, there should be no problems. And the fact that it will rise 400 meters, its radio horizon will increase and low-flying RCs popping out from the horizon will be recorded further and earlier good good
        1. Hey
          +1
          10 February 2018 18: 04
          And the fact that it will rise 400 meters, its radio horizon will increase and low-flying RCs popping out from the horizon will be recorded further and earlier

          It is specially made more powerful and raised higher, due to the conditions of the north, weather, ice cover, low magnetic field, etc. These and other conditions of the north greatly reduce the capabilities of any radar. And this radar will see no further than its counterparts in the south, and possibly closer. To compensate, it is necessary to install a larger number of such stations so that they overlap each other's zones more.
          1. Don
            +2
            10 February 2018 20: 06
            Is it possible to technically adapt such radars in the future for guiding missile defense? This would significantly increase Russia's missile defense capabilities.
      2. 0
        10 February 2018 19: 39
        Quote: Thought Giant
        That's fine, now it is necessary

        Cross with electronic warfare! The coverage will be very good!
    2. +8
      10 February 2018 15: 10
      These radars are quite maintainable and reliable, modular, with redundancy.
      1. +5
        10 February 2018 15: 15
        Quote: ul_vitalii
        These radars are quite maintainable and reliable, modular, with redundancy.

        They are several times cheaper than the previous Darial complex and are not built for ten years, but, if my sclerosis does not change, for a year or yes (I could be wrong)
        1. +6
          10 February 2018 15: 28
          Quote: NEXUS
          Quote: ul_vitalii
          These radars are quite maintainable and reliable, modular, with redundancy.

          They are several times cheaper than the previous Darial complex and are not built for ten years, but, if my sclerosis does not change, for a year or yes (I could be wrong)

          That's right, they are factory readiness, that is, most of the factory settings.
          1. +1
            10 February 2018 17: 48
            Quote: ul_vitalii

            They are several times cheaper than the previous Darial complex and are not built for ten years, but, if my sclerosis does not change, for a year or yes (I could be wrong)

            Yes, "Daryal" near Pechera was built for a long time and expensive. Then the building was called - "Branch of the Observatory of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR." Took part, so to speak, in 77g.
    3. +5
      10 February 2018 15: 10
      Quote: NEXUS
      so that they can replace and overlap each other’s control areas.

      Multiple duplication is our everything! I hope those at the top understand this.
      1. +6
        10 February 2018 15: 23
        Quote: Monos
        Multiple duplication is our everything! I hope those at the top understand this.
        - Ah, then I remembered an anecdote along the way:
    4. +9
      10 February 2018 16: 45
      Here is a video published on October 9, 2016 about the Russian radar station. hi
    5. +4
      10 February 2018 16: 57
      Given the characteristics of the radar and the location of not only the Arctic, but the whole of northern Europe with all the Norwegian fiords where NATO submarines like to hang out, it will be in full view.
      1. 0
        10 February 2018 19: 46
        Quote: Soldier's father
        will be in full view.

        If Armavirskaya sees the entire Mediterranean Sea, then Murmanskaya will see much more1
    6. +1
      10 February 2018 17: 02
      2-th belt, as it were, actually
      It is a Don-2N radar station in Moscow near Sofrino, has a circular view at 3500 km from Moscow.
      1. 0
        10 February 2018 18: 10
        Don et yes. Above the pyramid is not small, let alone dive in and out!
    7. 0
      12 February 2018 01: 32
      Quote: NEXUS
      It would be nice to create several belts with such radars with us, so that they can replace and overlap the control areas of each other.

      First: How much will this "pleasure" cost?
      Second: They need a cover! And they will be hit with various types of rockets!
      Thirdly: If we deal with the cover and protection of the early warning system, then who and what will build the cover of the cities and industrial areas, on which the first ballistic missile strike of a potential enemy is calculated ?!
  2. 0
    10 February 2018 15: 01
    Further 6000 km? Powerful. And even at such a height ...
    1. 0
      10 February 2018 15: 20
      They write that the Kurds shot down a Turkish helicopter.
      1. +1
        10 February 2018 19: 38
        Quote: Muvka
        They write that the Kurds shot down a Turkish helicopter.

        let the scribblers write ... this is their job ... on this thread why?
  3. +1
    10 February 2018 15: 08
    Murmansk, they cover it very tightly even without it .. But the thing is necessary! This radar has already covered almost all of Russia under an umbrella, the work continues!
    1. Don
      +2
      10 February 2018 20: 10
      This is not an umbrella, but part of a missile attack warning system. We have an ABM umbrella only around Moscow for now.
  4. +2
    10 February 2018 15: 21
    The North is a missile-hazardous direction.
  5. +15
    10 February 2018 15: 27
    I hope they will build
    1. 0
      10 February 2018 15: 34
      Quote: Bouncer
      I hope they will build

      Do you have an idea that they might not build?
      1. +3
        10 February 2018 16: 38
        If the election is won by a sent Cossack who decides to come to terms with America, stop construction, stop investing in nuclear weapons, decide that we do not need anything in Syria, and so on

        but this is just whim and fantasy
        1. +1
          10 February 2018 18: 09
          Quote: allaykbar
          If the sent Cossack wins the elections,

          You scared all impressionable VO participants bully
      2. +2
        10 February 2018 19: 39
        Quote: Chertt
        Do you have an idea that they might not build?

        yes ... here everyone is shouting about an imminent NATO attack against us ... suddenly the day after tomorrow - it means they won't build
  6. 0
    10 February 2018 15: 30
    Fine. The main thing is to meet the construction deadlines.
  7. 0
    10 February 2018 15: 38
    do not have time

    NATO attacks earlier
    1. +1
      10 February 2018 16: 39
      it will slip on a frozen yellow puddle on white snow, which will be in their way after my performance

  8. +1
    10 February 2018 16: 26
    It would be nice to place Voronezh in Kamchatka and Chukotka - from there you can view the Pacific Ocean and the FSA, almost entirely.
  9. 0
    10 February 2018 16: 38
    Quote: NEXUS
    Early warning radar is a necessary thing. It would be nice to create several belts with such radars with us, so that they can replace and overlap the control areas of each other.

    Why do you need multiple belts? They overlap and so overlap.

    Quote: hrych
    And the fact that she will rise 400 meters

    I wonder if the authors of the note at least looked at the map of this area? Where is the height of 499 meters?
    1. 0
      10 February 2018 19: 25
      Almost everywhere, I live on the coast of the Kola Bay (on the left bank) 5 km from the bay, 239 m high.
      And I will add, the operating radar "Dnepr" SPRN still no one disconnects. It is also not far from Murmansk.
      If you are interested, google the topographic maps of the Murmansk region.
      Nothing that in the Murmansk region. there are Khibiny
    2. 0
      10 February 2018 19: 56
      Five points! This radar (over-the-horizon) does not need "heights"!
  10. 0
    10 February 2018 19: 19
    strange, but the Yankees still haven't bothered with another Russian miracle
    1. +1
      10 February 2018 19: 40
      Quote: Volka
      strange, but the Yankees still haven't bothered with another Russian miracle

      except you - this is not considered a miracle by anyone ...
      1. 0
        10 February 2018 19: 48
        your respected humor is lame as is the correct spelling, learn Russian before scoffing
        1. 0
          11 February 2018 09: 59
          Quote: Volka
          as well as the spelling

          belay ... and I'm learning from you ....... you know I found a miracle fool
          Quote: Volka
          learn Russian before you scoff

          watch yourself ... he knows Russian ..... punctuation marks without you studied fool
    2. 0
      10 February 2018 19: 58
      Quote: Volka
      strange, but the Yankees still haven't bothered with another Russian miracle

      Maybe they have taken care of, but they can not oppose anything!
  11. 0
    10 February 2018 19: 29
    Quote: Volka
    strange, but the Yankees still haven't bothered with another Russian miracle

    And they already know him where and how much will be.
    1. 0
      10 February 2018 19: 49
      and the respected press is silent however
    2. 0
      10 February 2018 20: 00
      Quote: Old26
      , where and how much will be.

      Thank God not everyone knows!
  12. 0
    10 February 2018 21: 16
    Quote: VALERIK_097
    Almost everywhere, I live on the coast of the Kola Bay (on the left bank) 5 km from the bay, 239 m high.
    And I will add, the operating radar "Dnepr" SPRN still no one disconnects. It is also not far from Murmansk.
    If you are interested, google the topographic maps of the Murmansk region.
    Nothing that in the Murmansk region. there are Khibiny

    I know. Including that there are Khibiny, but no one wrote that the current station is being shut down. Prada is hard to say that it is not far from Murmansk, the distance there is about 100 km. But from Olenegorsk really close. And if you look at the topographic map of the outskirts of Olenegorsk, in particular the same point "Olenegorsk-1" with ORTU, then yes, we really have an altitude of about 150-250 meters above sea level. The only point with an altitude of 289 meters is at the point where the tropospheric station was previously located. Then yes, this point fits sweat this height. But the distance from the current node is about 6-7 km. And all the times before, in particular in Usolye Sibirskoye, a new one was placed next to the old operating one.
  13. 0
    10 February 2018 23: 57
    Quote: Volka
    and the respected press is silent however
    It's okay! No need to know about this "respected" press.
  14. +1
    11 February 2018 00: 51
    Quote: Tol100v
    Thank God not everyone knows!

    About the early warning radar? We don't know yet, but they are already posting everything, including photos of construction sites. How many have we written about the construction of the Voronezh station in the Zeya region? And they are already writing ..

    .
    Quote: Tol100v
    Five points! This radar (over-the-horizon) does not need "heights"!

    These are not over-the-horizon, but over-the-horizon radars

    Quote: Old26
    The only point with an altitude of 289 meters is at the point where the tropospheric station was previously located.

    I noticed an error. There this point with an altitude of 489 above sea level
  15. 0
    11 February 2018 04: 08
    Oh, generally fine. And taking into account those under construction and already built
    the field will be overlapping twice and three times.
  16. 0
    12 February 2018 11: 15
    Quote: Starover_Z
    First: How much will this "pleasure" cost?

    The numbers are different. For example, the figure flashed that "Voronezh-M" (three-section) cost 1,5 billion rubles, "Voronezh-VP" (six-section) - 2,85 billion rubles, "Voronezh-DM" - 4,3 billion . rubles. how much these figures correspond - no idea.