The second destroyer type Zumwalt completed sea trials

54
The second "super destroyer" type Zumwalt for the US Navy will soon join the ranks fleet. According to the portal defensenews.com, the company Bath Iron Works has successfully completed sea trials of the ship Michael Monsoor.

The report of the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) unit of the US Navy indicates that the ship has proven itself during the tests and in many ways has surpassed the requirements of seafarers. This was the second entry into the sea of ​​the destroyer Michael Monsoor (in December last year, the tests were interrupted due to a breakdown on the ship).



The second destroyer type Zumwalt completed sea trials


Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001) - the second in a series of three new-generation destroyers designed for the US Navy. The first of them - Zumwalt (DDG 1000) - was completed in December 2015 of the year and in May last year entered the disposal of the US Navy, passing sea trials. The third ship of the series, Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG 1002), is planned to be completed before the end of 2018. The construction of destroyers involved the company General Dynamics.

Destroyers of the Zumwalt type are fundamentally new warships, radically different from previous military developments for the US Navy. The shape and materials of the hull make ships almost imperceptible for detection. The captain of the fishing vessel, Lawrence Pye, told Fox News that he was less than a kilometer from the new destroyer when he went to sea for testing, and on his radar, Zumwalt, having 183 meters in length, was displayed as an 15-meter vessel.

Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001) is one of the largest and heavily armed ships in its class. The destroyer length is 183 m, full displacement - 13 200 t. Basic armament includes 80 launchers for missiles, two artillery mounts and two anti-aircraft installations Mk. 110 caliber 57 mm, transmits "Warspot"
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    5 February 2018 12: 17
    the ship performed well during the tests and exceeded the requirements of sailors in many respects. This was the second launch of the destroyer Michael Monsoor (last December, the tests were interrupted due to damage to the ship).
    strangely recourse why didn't you break this time? not finalization request
    1. +9
      5 February 2018 12: 21
      Quote: Angel_and_Demon
      weird recourse why didn't it break this time? not finalization

      Wait Victor ahead fellow Now fans will run in and explain that this one will definitely not break. laughing drinks
      1. +6
        5 February 2018 12: 26
        Quote: vlad66
        Now fans will come running and explain

        well, wait for your mom, wait for your ...... laughing drinks
      2. +1
        5 February 2018 12: 29
        The mattress mattresses took into account previous mistakes, but they will never be able to correct the principal one. This warship with the most minimal combat capabilities is unlikely to be widely demanded by US sailors during any military operations.
        1. 0
          5 February 2018 15: 08
          One thing is not clear. Why does the author stupidly sculpt 57mm guns in the composition of weapons. They were there only in the initial stage of the project, and now, like with all people, they stand 30mm. hi
    2. +3
      5 February 2018 12: 44
      Reminds pictures from history books :)


      1. +4
        5 February 2018 12: 48
        Quote: The_Lancet
        A bit like :)

        Have you seen many forms of irons?
    3. +2
      5 February 2018 13: 38
      reprimand Stirlitz, or who is there with us?
  2. +2
    5 February 2018 12: 21
    we are waiting on the ocean expanses this is a handsome iron ...... and it remains for us to see with white envy how American shipyards work ........
    1. +5
      5 February 2018 12: 22
      Burbon Today, 12:21 PM New
      waiting in the ocean, this is a handsome iron.

      "waiting" - is this about whom?
      1. +7
        5 February 2018 12: 27
        Quote: aszzz888
        "waiting" - is this about whom?

        it's about admirers of the great and beautiful laughing
        1. +4
          5 February 2018 12: 29
          Angel_and_Demon Today, 12:27 ↑ it's about admirers of the great and beautiful laughing

          Along the way it is ...
          1. +5
            5 February 2018 12: 34
            Quote: aszzz888
            Along the way it is ...

            to each his own
            1. +2
              5 February 2018 21: 40
              Angel_and_Demon Today, 12:34 And why did you put it on display? Not a shame not a conscience?
              1. +4
                6 February 2018 08: 55
                Quote: GradusHuK
                Is not shame not conscience?

                share
      2. 0
        5 February 2018 12: 35
        Quote: aszzz888
        "waiting" - is this about whom?

        what do you think ??
        1. +4
          5 February 2018 12: 38
          ... I think it’s hard to miss this vessel ...
          1. 0
            5 February 2018 12: 40
            Quote: aszzz888
            I think that it’s difficult to miss this vessel ..

            and so below the Jew wrote that he was not visible on the radar belay
            1. +3
              5 February 2018 12: 42
              ... after all, I will write that he is still diving, and when he emerges he takes off ...
              ... and those captains of fishing vessels - many more slap in the media ...
              pi.si read the post of NEXUS today, 12:35
              1. +2
                5 February 2018 12: 50
                Quote: aszzz888
                pi.si read the post of NEXUS today, 12:35

                you yourself and the nexus is not an authority in the Navy ... for me, if a Jew said it was invisible, then it is so! lol
                1. +2
                  5 February 2018 12: 54
                  What did the bite bite? I am translating for tankers pi.sy. is a PS postscript. What about the Jews - good , I understand the humor, but NEXUS was wrongly offended ...
                  1. 0
                    5 February 2018 12: 56
                    Quote: aszzz888
                    I understand the humor.

                    yes it’s clear you don’t understand, since about pi.si. started to chew)) laughing
                    1. +1
                      5 February 2018 12: 59
                      Well, I definitely had a bite! ... and about pi.si. swallowed ... come on no offense, harmful to health! Good luck drinks
                      1. 0
                        5 February 2018 13: 05
                        Quote: aszzz888
                        Good luck!

                        hi ... good luck! ...
      3. 0
        5 February 2018 13: 39
        about long-range aviation, I suppose
  3. +2
    5 February 2018 12: 25
    "Captain of the fishing vessel Lawrence Pie told Fox News reporters,
    that was less than a kilometer from the new destroyer when he
    went to sea to test, and on his radar Zumwalt, which is 183 meters long,
    displayed as a 15 meter ship. "

    For those who do not understand what "stealth" is. smile
    1. +10
      5 February 2018 12: 35
      Quote: voyaka uh
      For those who do not understand what "stealth" is.

      Yeah ... tell this to our fighters.
      As for this ship ... mattresses have such a luxury to dream up on the topic of future strike ships, having 64 Arly Burke in service and this is without the number of similar destroyers from NATO allies.
      At the same time, they are building these new destroyers quickly enough, and we are stretching the modernization of Nakhimov for 8 years + 2 years of testing. Total 10 years. It is depressing.
      Instead of destroyers, we are building frigates, which are also being handed over to the fleets not very quickly. We are all announcing new projects of strike ships, but things aren’t moving beyond exhibitions yet. There is no frigate of project 22350M, no destroyer Leader, or at least a non-nuclear destroyer Storm ... in general, against the background of the rapid construction of new US ships, our crawl on the belly updating the fleets looks very depressing.
      1. 0
        5 February 2018 18: 24
        "Yeah ... tell it to our fighters" ////

        You read it again, carefully: "less than a kilometer away from the new destroyer."
        The length of which is about 200 m ...
        Understand what radio-absorbing coatings are? smile
    2. +5
      5 February 2018 12: 46
      even if you believe in the advertising hype about "invisibility", then for such large, small-scale and expensive ships it’s quite possible to arrange personal escort, and it will cost less orders of magnitude than giving them semi-mythical “stealth”.
      1. +1
        6 February 2018 01: 01
        Quote: slontusid
        even if you believe in the hype about "invisibility."

        what it means to believe or not to believe is far from the first appearance of Zumvolt, and this is not the first time they have copied it on the radar.
        Quote: slontusid
        then it’s quite realistic to arrange personal escort for such large, small-scale, and expensive ships, and this will cost less orders of magnitude than giving them semi-mythical “stealth”.

        and how will you accompany him during the hostilities? To each ship by submarine?
    3. +5
      5 February 2018 12: 56
      Quote: voyaka uh
      For those who do not understand what "stealth" is.

      What is there to understand, any fisherman sees him on his radar. laughing And in warships, radars will be better. lol
    4. 0
      5 February 2018 13: 26
      Quote: voyaka uh
      on its radar, Zumwalt, which is 183 meters long, was displayed as a 15-meter vessel
      Given what is stated
      Quote: Brechopedia
      The destroyer has stealth means that reduce its ESR by 50 times
      this is exactly about 7 times the area, given the superstructure of firewood.
  4. +7
    5 February 2018 12: 26
    laughing The destroyer from the mattress nicknamed "Iron-2" has successfully completed sea trials. Yes, it wasn’t just a storm during the tests, otherwise the iron would have sank successfully. Yes
  5. +4
    5 February 2018 12: 26
    two artillery mounts
    that the cost of one guided projectile for the gun reached $ 0,8-1,2 million, and taking into account depreciation and maintenance of the gun, the cost of the shot reached $ 2 million.

    He will shoot a lot with shells, with such a cost?
    1. +3
      5 February 2018 12: 45
      The funds that Russia lent to the United States by investing in their debt receipts will be enough for about 50 such shells ...
      1. +2
        5 February 2018 12: 48
        Jack Today, 12:45 ↑
        The funds that Russia lent to the United States by investing in their debt receipts will be enough for about 50 such shells ...

        ... and is it serious? laughing .. don’t be so gullible, especially to any "businessmen", "echo", etc.
        1. +1
          5 February 2018 13: 43
          Do you trust Lente.ru? Type in a search engine: "Russia lent the US 106 billion dollars"
          (information from 18.01.2018/XNUMX/XNUMX)
          1. +1
            5 February 2018 15: 03
            This would be enough for 8 pieces of the most expensive warships in the world, such as the aircraft carrier Gerald R. Ford!
            1. +1
              5 February 2018 15: 32
              If you hear that there is not enough money for something in Russia, remember THIS:
              Forbes: "... The cumulative fortune of 200 richest businessmen grew over the year by $ 100 billion, to $ 460 billion. The number of dollar billionaires increased from 77 to 96. The cut-off threshold increased to $ 500 million from $ 350 million last year ..."
              1. +1
                6 February 2018 04: 05
                Jack Yesterday, 15:32 ↑ New
                If you hear that there is not enough money for something in Russia, remember THIS:

                Yes, I am in the know. And then what? We will not correct this situation ...
  6. +4
    5 February 2018 12: 33
    The first of them - Zumwalt (DDG 1000) - was completed in December 2015 and in May last year came at the disposal of the US Navy, having passed sea trials. The third ship of the series - Lyndon B. Johnson (DDG 1002) - is planned to be completed before the end of 2018.
    Good construction speed, given that it does not corvet ...
    1. 0
      5 February 2018 13: 23
      Quote: Ingvar0401
      Good construction speed, given that it does not corvet ...
      Well, yes.
      Given that the whole add-in is wood (balsa and cork).
  7. +1
    5 February 2018 13: 34
    But how shitty he looks.
    It feels as if you are viewing an ordinary destroyer through a crooked mirror.
    Floating iceberg.
    ps IMHO.
  8. +3
    5 February 2018 14: 03
    Quote: Giant thought
    The mattress mattresses took into account previous mistakes, but they will never be able to correct the principal one. This warship with the most minimal combat capabilities is unlikely to be widely demanded by US sailors during any military operations.

    That is, 80 cells for stealth technology rockets and artillery shooting (per 100 km) do not bother you at all?

    Tell us which ship in the Russian fleet has similar parameters. Well, to understand that in our fleet, sailors will not be in demand
    1. 0
      6 February 2018 04: 45
      you have a mistake in the word “claimed” - there must be one “n” (or three)
  9. +1
    5 February 2018 14: 55
    "Oh, now it’s already 2 pieces! - The more we surrender, the better" (c)
  10. +2
    5 February 2018 15: 27
    Bring to mind, develop technology ...
  11. +4
    5 February 2018 15: 32
    Schaub mice have bitten you! am
    1. +3
      5 February 2018 16: 09
      wassat good What kind? Volatile
      1. +2
        5 February 2018 18: 00
        Quote: Kurare
        Volatile?

        what
        Well ... probably ... floating ... drinks
  12. 0
    6 February 2018 00: 19
    Well - OK, one invisible woodwafer .. But there was something about the fact that these destroyers didn’t have much to shoot ... The railgun didn’t grow together, the promised very smart shells - as it were, but they are very expensive.
    I did not specifically dig this topic, but I remember that they were going to build 30 pieces, but only 3 came out ...
    It may be invisible to civilian devices, but who said that military sailors use civilian equipment ....?
    Somehow not rushing with the Americans with this project.
    1. 0
      6 February 2018 01: 07
      Quote: KOT BYUN
      Well - OK, one invisible woodwafer .. But there was something about the fact that these destroyers didn’t have much to shoot ... The railgun didn’t grow together, the promised very smart shells - as it were, but they are very expensive.

      80 cells for missiles is far from nothing to shoot.
  13. +1
    6 February 2018 04: 38
    the iron - it is the iron!
  14. +2
    6 February 2018 04: 42
    with such a hull, seaworthiness should be at a height up to sailing in river waters, perhaps even along the bottom - so to speak, “three in one”