"Russian was very close." New videos of Russian EP-27 by Russian Su-3

February 1 2018 61

The Pentagon has published new footage with the interception by the Russian Su-27 fighter of the American reconnaissance aircraft EP-3 Aries. The interception, which is more logical to call escort, took place over the Black Sea - south of the city of Yalta. Press Service of the 6th fleet The US Navy reports that escorting an American aircraft by a Russian fighter lasted at least 2 hours.

On the eve of the Pentagon published footage of the flight of the Su-27 a few meters literally in front of the nose EP-3 Aries. In the United States, they stated that "the Russian plane was very close," and this is "unprofessional and dangerous, since the American board hit the jet."

Now the US military has decided to publish at once several video escorts of the Russian Su-27 reconnaissance aircraft in the sky over the Black Sea in the Crimea region.

The Pentagon notes that the Su-27 moved parallel course - often at a distance of about 1,5 meters from the EP-3.

New batch of videos from the USA with "Hollywood" angles and "video replays":

Recall that the US State Department called on Russia to abandon "this method of intercepting American aircraft."

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Herculesic

+15

1 February 2018 07: 04

Yes, they went to catch a butterfly farm! As if we were brazenly near California or Washington, fly at least 20 times a month, and even show that we are not allowed to take photos from a small height of sharks in the water!
1. Alex_Rarog
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2018 07: 06
  
  Pilots in not crap? Like the sailors last time?))
  1. Cheshire
    
    +5
    
    1 February 2018 07: 09
    
    That's right. For N E * * *!
    1. Thrall
      
      +17
      
      1 February 2018 07: 14
      
      That he still did not dump fuel on the American as in Soviet times.
      1. Alexander War
        
        +5
        
        1 February 2018 07: 23
        
        Not a bad option, and to shoot heat traps after a fuel dump, in general, it’s interesting that ours can shoot heat traps in P-8 Poseidon engines?
    2. Cube123
      
      +14
      
      1 February 2018 07: 18
      
      Quote: Cheshire
      That's right. For N E * * *!
      
      The presence of a foreign aircraft at such a distance, from the border, is an excellent screen for radio waves and a source of noise interference. So it reduces the intelligence function of the reconnaissance aircraft to almost zero. Great way to fight. Therefore, it "hung" for almost two hours.
      1. Polite Moose
        
        +4
        
        1 February 2018 07: 51
        
        Quote: Cube123
        The presence of a foreign aircraft at such a distance, from the border, is an excellent screen for radio waves and a source of noise interference. So it reduces the intelligence function of the reconnaissance aircraft to almost zero. Great way to fight. Therefore, it "hung" for almost two hours.
        
        And here I have your comment. The question caused me: How safe is it for our pilot to stay in such close proximity to a reconnaissance aircraft with a powerful radar? Is there any harm to health? Does the fuselage and glazing of the cockpit screen fighter crew from microwave radiation? Specialists, please answer.
        
        Cube123
        
        +10
        
        1 February 2018 07: 56
        
        In this case, in my opinion, there is no radio hazard. A scout does not deal with powerful locations. Rather, a bearing and wiretap. This is not AWACS.
        And the locator, I think that this is not more dangerous for a pilot than flying in a formation. Own fighter locator "shines" constantly and is much closer.
        
        75 hammer
        
        +1
        
        1 February 2018 08: 38
        
        The stripes wanted to try to track the frequency change algorithm on themselves, using radiation detectors, and here the SU-27 knocked them all the work, although in fact in the late 80s they were already able to record from long-range radar satellites!
  2. volodya
    
    +26
    
    1 February 2018 07: 11
    
    Do not go to us and the pants will be in order! There are not enough mats!
    1. esaul
      
      +2
      
      1 February 2018 07: 39
      
      "Russian was very close."
      
      So, why so far away from your shore? It’s simple - they were on the way, and in the sky the movement is intense and the faint of heart are asked not to worry.
  3. Alex-a832
    
    +3
    
    1 February 2018 07: 19
    
    It’s time for amers to introduce the posts of full-time onboard psychologists, otherwise it will start at the sight of ours to jump in panic from our planes without a parachute ...
  4. vlad66
    
    +10
    
    1 February 2018 07: 32
    
    Recall that the US State Department called on Russia to abandon "this method of intercepting American aircraft."
    
    No, stinky striped why they fought for it and ran into it, don’t fucking flying where you would rather not stink.
2. krops777
  
  +5
  
  1 February 2018 07: 12
  
  The video seemed to be shot on a Chinese DVR with clips of 30 seconds.
3. Mar.Tirah
  
  +14
  
  1 February 2018 07: 13
  
  Well done pilots. Once again I admire their professionalism. I also know from service that Americans respect professionals. Now they know that the closer they come to our strategic objects, the harder they will be met.
4. Spartanez300
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2018 08: 18
  
  And what they wanted, that they would wave their wings and wish a good day and then roll off, not guys, the times when you were allowed a lot. Our pilot, well done with them, just needs to make their goosebumps run at the sight of our plane.
5. NEXUS
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2018 09: 25
  
  Quote: Herkulesich
  As if we were brazenly near California or Washington, we fly at least 20 times a month
  
  Well, we also drive our 95th and 160th near the borders of NATO states ... but only after interception we don’t ring that they are acting illegally. Intercepting this has been a common thing since the times of the USSR.
  Quote: Alex_Rarog
  Pilots in not crap? Like the sailors last time?))
  
  With such close passage and display of rockets under the wings, our pilot simply scared the mattresses, making it clear that Poseidon was not welcome here.
6. Star
  
  +1
  
  1 February 2018 22: 30
  
  I agree.
  What do they want? After all, they themselves very close fly up to our territory, and we certainly fly airplanes ....
Herculesic

+6

1 February 2018 07: 04

I hope that at least our pilot was given a prize and diploma!
1. Andrey Yuryevich
  
  +3
  
  1 February 2018 07: 52
  
  Herculesych Today, 07:04 New
  I hope that at least our pilot was given a prize and diploma!
  
  for routine work, do not give bonuses ...
Same lech

+7

1 February 2018 07: 05

"Russian was very close."

Yes, yes ... and diapers so quickly filled with liquid ... this is such an unforgettable event in life ... a lot of emotions ... impressions and waste products.

The shots of course resemble scenes from a horror movie ...

because of the propeller of the plane, the terrible nose of the SU-27 is slowly approaching ... in which sits a terrible Russian infant eating for lunch ... involuntarily defunct ...
1. novel66
  
  +5
  
  1 February 2018 07: 20
  
  Well, it was not in vain that he scared him so, something interesting was there ...
  1. Angel_and_Demon
    
    +3
    
    1 February 2018 08: 45
    
    Quote: novel xnumx
    Well, it was not in vain that he scared him so, something interesting was there ...
    
    This is a new mattress newsreel - "I want to know everything"
IL-18

+1

1 February 2018 07: 08

But they didn’t know that we could fly a Su-27 there! Type naive! All Americans lie. Normal interception, everyone is alive. Pilots knew what would happen, even iPhones were prepared, photos and videos were posted on social networks.
Observer2014

+5

1 February 2018 07: 08

Americans don’t let the hatch open. Our people can fly there and fly out In general, you can easily play out
often at a distance of 1,5 meters from the EP-3.
First of all, it concerns Americans. They are still louts.
1. novel66
  
  +2
  
  1 February 2018 07: 22
  
  it’s a shame, I’m used to be rude
savage1976

+1

1 February 2018 07: 12

Well, since you don’t know how to fly in a jet, you need to learn a little, and then fly to the borders of Russia.
cedar

+1

1 February 2018 07: 12

"... US State Department called on Russia to abandon" such interception method American aircraft. "
And where is the interception?
Fear has big eyes...
Laksamana besar

+3

1 February 2018 07: 12

Yes, he is there a few tens of meters, bullshit again driven.
1. Same lech
  
  0
  
  1 February 2018 07: 15
  
  bullshit again driven.
  
  Smelly bullshit ... even put on a gas mask ... I hope the dashboard is not splattered.
2. Polite Moose
  
  +1
  
  1 February 2018 07: 42
  
  Quote: Laksamana Besar
  Yes, he is there a few tens of meters, bullshit again driven.
  
  I suppose that when the distance decreased to 1,5 m, the videographers did not have time to shoot ...
tchoni

+1

1 February 2018 07: 14

That's right, I'm talking about the actions of our pilot. Hooliganism should be used to good cause, otherwise, you’ve taken fashion in the hunchbacked peep from doing nothing))) And he showed the daredevil and the nostalgia was battered)))
Simon

+2

1 February 2018 07: 18

What, fear has big eyes! Do not fucking fly near our borders!
Mountain shooter

0

1 February 2018 07: 24

When our "Bears" or Tu 160 fly over neutral waters, their packs curl.
And then the scout is approaching OUR Crimea! So what, give him to take readings from our radars? But FIG. EW would have involved ... But not. This is a surprise for more serious cases.
Simon

+1

1 February 2018 07: 24

Quote: The same Lech
bullshit again driven.

Smelly bullshit ... even put on a gas mask ... I hope the dashboard is not splattered.

Yes! The flight seat was ruined with fright!
Vard

+2

1 February 2018 07: 30

I hope our pilot will be awarded and promoted ... it is unlikely that this scout will turn up to us now ...
1. Alexander War
  
  +1
  
  1 February 2018 07: 34
  
  They will meddle anyway and then whine!
2. realist
  
  0
  
  1 February 2018 12: 38
  
  will turn up, he has such a job.
Simon

+1

1 February 2018 07: 33

Quote: cedar
"... US State Department called on Russia to abandon" such interception method American aircraft. "
And where is the interception?
Fear has big eyes...

Yes, we spat on their calls! As we want, we intercept. There is nothing to fly near our borders!
Strashila

+3

1 February 2018 07: 34

I sell for what I bought ... in the 80s of the last century, our Bears patrolled somewhere close to America ... everything went as always, fighters flew in and started flying around ... everything was as always ... and then one of them breaks down and begins to twist the fortress around the car ... the crew clenched its teeth and kept on the course ... he was furious for a long time, exhausted all his nerves ... they arrived at the base, exchanged opinions about the departure ... here in conversations he met the arrow of the stern, it was him only the second flight ... like you saw fighters ... they saw ... and the fact that the pilot is black ... and that ,,, ??? so I showed him the shafts of shoes, a poke like you are as black as she is ... and then he started spinning around us.
Simon

+1

1 February 2018 07: 36

Quote: Alex_Rarog
Pilots in not crap? Like the sailors last time?))

Who knows. Americans are silent about this!
ilmarvaar

+2

1 February 2018 07: 38

For excessive arrogance Russian beats in the face. The Americans need to be reminded of this.
Simon

+1

1 February 2018 07: 43

Quote: Alex_Rarog
Pilots in not crap? Like the sailors last time?))

Of course not. Only in diapers imposed!
Wedmak

+3

1 February 2018 07: 51

The US State Department called on Russia to abandon "this method of intercepting American aircraft"

The State Department believes that the S-400 air defense system to cope better?
Laksamana besar

+2

1 February 2018 07: 52

This is cooler ... :
Andrey Yuryevich

0

1 February 2018 07: 54

"Russian was very close."
- you need to be afraid when the Russians are not visible.
aszzz888

+1

1 February 2018 08: 19

Recall that the State Department US called Russia to abandon "such a method of intercepting American aircraft."

Yeah, they immediately rushed to fulfill the "call" !!!
Altona

+1

1 February 2018 08: 21

Quote: Cube123
The presence of a foreign aircraft at such a distance, from the border, is an excellent screen for radio waves and a source of noise interference. So it reduces the intelligence function of the reconnaissance aircraft to almost zero. Great way to fight. Therefore, it "hung" for almost two hours.

---------------------------
Well, yes, the scout "opened" our air defense response rate, radio communication, and so on. But paid journalism does not write about this.
gla172

0

1 February 2018 08: 38
...nothing changes....
tlauicol

+2

1 February 2018 08: 40

poor Americans - in the last week they "crap" 10 times, i.e. made 10 reconnaissance flights at our borders. not counting the ships - every three weeks in the Black Sea a new one. Nifiga they are not afraid, do not flatter yourself
slavaseven

0

1 February 2018 08: 42

This is aerobatics! Well done, pilots! Let them fear and envy
pvv113

0

1 February 2018 09: 51

The US State Department called on Russia to abandon "such a method of intercepting American aircraft."

Americans are not used to this attitude
Overlock

0

1 February 2018 10: 16

"Russian was very close."
-------------------------------
"All sorts of walking around here!"
VohaAhov

0

1 February 2018 11: 52

You look at these frames and feel something smells like shit. It can be seen the crew of the American plane slightly collapsed.
realist

0

1 February 2018 12: 36

there is no video quality, you need to buy a DVR and give them, but for us the news is good, the Russian pilot calmly flew next to the American plane, did nothing dangerous (he didn’t go to the ram, he didn’t go to the missile attack position), then 1.5 meters Is this how to say a lot or a little? the pilot knows better. and if something goes wrong don't hell fly.
gromoboj

0

1 February 2018 12: 49

The US State Department called on Russia to abandon "such a method of intercepting American aircraft."

What do they offer? Let the scout in the swap course and give the afterburner? Its airspace and bring down what for?
Or was it necessary for the dryer to stand ahead of the scout at 15 meters and give fast and furious?
Ivan.A

0

1 February 2018 13: 25

In the United States, they said that "the Russian plane was very close", and this is "unprofessional and dangerous, since the American board fell into the jet stream."

And let them not fly, otherwise you will not get into such a stream
Recall that the US State Department called on Russia to abandon "this method of intercepting American aircraft."

They forgot to ask them how to intercept our enemy!
Witness 45

+1

1 February 2018 13: 45

It is not clear why they are indignant, perhaps because of their lack of geography they mixed up the Gulf of Mexico with the Black Sea? That's when our pilots will intercept them off the coast of Florida, then let them be outraged.
the monastery

0

1 February 2018 21: 14

is it a hundred and a half meters?
ы
svp67

0

2 February 2018 08: 18

Bravo!!!!! Our pilots of naval aviation can meet "uninvited guests with" special, naval chic "
Lycan

0

28 February 2018 11: 04

Are there any of the military jurisprudence experts? One idea came up.
- Let the UAV get closer
- carry out a control interception,
- turn the trajectory of its passage into our territory,
- deploy a competently scheduled performance to intercept the device in case of unauthorized crossing of the border,
- put him "where necessary", making the situation as necessary for the landing of technical equipment,
- shielded to avoid the transmission of geolocation data,
- talk with the representative country that launched it, with a “trump card” in hand.

PS: If they refuse to talk constructively - to analyze it by technology.
You can even transplant "your" filling on it and give L / DPR for reconnaissance.

PPS: If such a method is legally justified, then this approach will make “partners” think deeply before launching something like this. Although they can go there not weak charge / chemistry / tactical. Set nuclear weapons / biohook / spoons with holes for non-removability.