Military Review

UN: International donors reluctantly allocate funds for humanitarian aid to Donbas

9
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs published a report that talks about the conflict in the Donbas as one of the bloodiest after the end of World War II for the civilian population. It was noted that during the conflict for 2017 a year in the Donbass 105 people were killed and about 500 were injured. This is on 6% more than in 2016 a year. In total, about 11 thousands of people (including the military) have already fallen victim to the conflict. Tens of thousands were injured and injured. Destroyed thousands of homes in different cities and towns of the region.


According to the UN Office, in December 2017, seven civilians were killed, 32 people were injured of varying degrees of severity.

UN: International donors reluctantly allocate funds for humanitarian aid to Donbas


It is reported that about 1,2 million people in the conflict zone are experiencing problems with food security. At the same time, the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said that in the 2018 year they are going to allocate 187 million dollars to assist approximately 2,3 million citizens in the conflict zone. Reports about it TASS.

It is important to note that with the announcement of the allocation of approximately 204 million dollars for residents of Donbass, as a result, the amount of funds allocated did not exceed 72 million. The UN said that "international donors were reluctant to allocate funds."

It is noteworthy that one of these "donors" - the United States - decides on the allocation of more than a third of a billion dollars to the UN to "investigate war crimes in Syria." Raqqi offers to investigate their carpet bombing?
Photos used:
www.globallookpress.com
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 1 February 2018 06: 16
    +2
    I am surprised .. Another person besides us, even if he is reluctant to engage in humanitarian aid in the Donbass?
    1. Herculesic
      Herculesic 1 February 2018 06: 20
      +3
      Nobody but us! For in the world this topic is interesting only for demagogy!
    2. Rurikovich
      Rurikovich 1 February 2018 06: 26
      +3
      Quote: 210ox
      Anyone else besides us, even if he is reluctant to engage in humanitarian aid in the Donbass?

      If we analyze the "greatest" humanitarian aid to the UN of Syria, it will become clear that Western inhabitants, especially the owners of factories and steamboats, are more likely to be interested in that part of the aid where you can heat up on financial flows yes In Syria, it was still possible to present thanks to terrorism, then in Donbass, under the scrutiny of close Russian media, it would not be possible to fool. Because they do not want to interfere lol This is the whole West hi
    3. vlad66
      vlad66 1 February 2018 07: 47
      +7
      Quote: 210ox
      I am surprised .. Another person besides us, even if he is reluctant to engage in humanitarian aid in the Donbass?

      On the contrary, they are Dmitry who are interested in cleaning the Donbass from the population of ghouls. negative hi
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 1 February 2018 06: 18
    +1
    The UN said that "international donors were reluctant to allocate funds."

    These "donors" were frightened, and who did this is well known.
  3. Herculesic
    Herculesic 1 February 2018 06: 22
    +1
    I know a bunch of international sponsors of terrorists and militants, but international donors, especially the humanities from them, are something from the category or the day before yesterday, or a good fairy tale for simpletons.
  4. bald
    bald 1 February 2018 06: 39
    0
    --- "The United States - decides to allocate more than a third of a billion dollars to the UN" - Everything, as people have, is the salary of UN employees in envelopes, well, a little bit in your pocket.
  5. Alex-a832
    Alex-a832 1 February 2018 06: 46
    +1
    The concept of humanitarian assistance is versatile - not only assistance with products and basic necessities, but also assistance for the restoration of the economy and production in countries that receive assistance. Capitalism considers humanitarian only through a filter of profit; socialism has a completely different approach to humanitarian. Vivid examples of opposites are the USSR (Russia) and the USA.
    In the case of the U.S. allocation of funds for the investigation of war crimes in Syria - this means purely to satisfy geopolitical interests - to collect incriminating data against Russia and Assad, since this investigation will not affect real war criminals, such as the United States itself.
  6. German Titov
    German Titov 1 February 2018 07: 55
    +2
    I don’t want to translate what the cars with the UN, OSCE, and Red Cross labels are called in Donetsk. Banned. To the car "Doctor Lisa" (Earth rest in peace for her) and the attitude is different.