Tests of the T-80BVM tank are scheduled for completion at the beginning of 2018.

64
Upgraded Tests tank T-80BVM is scheduled to be completed at the beginning of 2018. This was told by TASS in the research and production corporation Uralvagonzavod (UVZ).

Tests of the T-80BVM tank are scheduled for completion at the beginning of 2018.




The contract for the overhaul with the deep modernization of T-80BV tanks between the Ministry of Defense and Uralvagonzavod was concluded at the International Military-Technical Forum Army-2017.

Trials are scheduled for completion at the beginning of 2018.
- Said in the UVZ.

The company noted that during the modernization, the T-80BVM improved basic combat qualities, such as firepower, security and mobility, as well as improved management system, with the result that the tank began to meet modern requirements in all key parameters.

According to its characteristics, the car will be comparable to the T-72B3 tank. The state contract for the modernization of T-80BV tanks to the T-80BVM type was concluded in the 2017 year and has a long-term character. The volume of the first batch is up to two tank battalions.
- explained in the corporation.
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    31 January 2018 11: 11
    Tests of the T-80BVM tank are scheduled for completion at the beginning of 2018.
    Alas, the car is good, but should remain as a transitional option, until the appearance of the T-80 M "Breakthrough-2"
    1. +4
      31 January 2018 11: 17
      And when does the beginning of 2018 according to the Uralvagon version end? winked
      1. +3
        31 January 2018 11: 18
        Quote: siberalt
        And when the beginning of 2018 according to Uralvagon ends

        February 23.
    2. +7
      31 January 2018 11: 28
      what for ?
      in fact, the T-80BVM is an Arctic tank, the west has no emnip in this direction at all, that is, 80 rivals do not have anything at all.
      1. +6
        31 January 2018 11: 51
        Arctic? And what did they do at the GSVG? laughing drinks
        1. +2
          31 January 2018 12: 00
          Quote: Doliva63
          Arctic? And what did they do at the GSVG? laughing drinks

          And there, what, the modification of "BVM" was?
          1. +5
            31 January 2018 19: 05
            What "arctic" appeared in BVM?
            1. +3
              31 January 2018 19: 44
              Quote: Doliva63
              What "arctic" appeared in BVM?

              And what, do you know about all the “lotions” of BVM? Does your uncle work at the “shoe factory”, in the sense of UVZ? You have already been answered here about the difference in the operation of a gas turbine engine and a diesel engine at low temperatures. For answers like “I served and I know everything,” I will not answer. Such connoisseurs with corporal marks (in real life, and not on the site, with Marshall stars obtained in fierce battles with the keyboard) are MORISCHE.
              1. +5
                31 January 2018 19: 59
                No, I don’t know all the “lotions”, therefore I ask. And so the operation of the t-80 (and others) was studied at the department of operation of the BTT in the tank school laughing There is no fundamental difference in the geographic use of Soviet tanks. Of course, the desert for the T-80 is not a gift, but not deadly at all.
                1. +1
                  31 January 2018 20: 06
                  Quote: Doliva63
                  There is no fundamental difference in the geographical use of Soviet tanks ..

                  They taught you badly. In the instructions for use a lot of "difference" is written. There is both special fuel and preheating ... I remember very well how we changed the oil mixture to MH7,5 oil only in order to lower the oil temperature at startup by 10 degrees. At the same time, all rubber seals had to be replaced, which were simply FATED with new oil.
                  1. +4
                    31 January 2018 20: 54
                    We were taught how to. Some then shot the sun. In general, a good car. Whoever has the right to shoot himself,
                  2. +1
                    31 January 2018 20: 57
                    Stepan, welcome hi In the 90s, for the first time, I came across engine additives. Then my colleague poured 50 grams into his “Constipation” and he “flew”. Then, under this business, they began to slip any bullshit. But then I took an interest in this development. There was an example that a tank (like the T-72) traveled 500 km through the desert with a broken crankcase, but before that it was completely filled with oil instead of oil. Lie or truth?
                    1. 0
                      31 January 2018 21: 07
                      Quote: Svarog51
                      Lie or truth?

                      I wrote my post only as an example regarding aircraft engines. He never served in tank troops. I'm sorry.
                  3. +2
                    31 January 2018 21: 00
                    Quote: Piramidon
                    At the same time, all rubber seals had to be replaced, which were simply FATED with new oil.

                    You haven’t messed up anything? Even rubber overhaul plants cannot change the tires for ed. 28 (GTD-1000). And if you're not talking about tank engines, then x ... and don’t talk. And that was special, compared the engine of Honda and the engine of Almaty.
        2. +6
          31 January 2018 12: 24
          The T-80 has a gas turbine engine, and he really does not like dust. But he does not need frost and humidity. Therefore, it is arctic.
          1. +2
            31 January 2018 13: 59
            It starts in the cold better than diesel. Do not invent too much. But where are the crews prepared for these tanks? Of the shortened traffic cops will be recruited? bully
            1. +2
              31 January 2018 17: 31
              of course, somewhere this breakthrough of the abbreviations should be added .... but the former traffic police are simply not a landowner in the tank ....
            2. 0
              31 January 2018 21: 21
              Quote: Alex777
              But where are the crews prepared for these tanks? Of the shortened traffic cops will be recruited?

              A cho from GAI officers, but not from "servants of the people"? They, it seems, are also planning to reduce them.
              http://zakonguru.com/trudovoe/personal/sokrasheni
              je / gossluzhashhix-v-2016.html # i
            3. The comment was deleted.
            4. +2
              1 February 2018 12: 15
              Quote: Alex777
              It starts in the cold better than diesel.

              Well, started the engine, and then? Can you start the movement right away? Who warmed up the oil in the transmission?
              In my opinion, this is all far-fetched. Put a powerful preheater, and do not bother. Having three MBTs was a luxury even for the USSR.
          2. +5
            31 January 2018 20: 09
            I remember Yelan-86, a heavy tank regiment on the t-80, in the VET, the tanks pounded into the pits and warmed the air so that it would be possible to work. Middle Urals, no Arctic. Che retype journalistic cliches something? Normal tank. I ate a lot, yes. Sometimes it seems that many writers here did not even serve urgent.
          3. 0
            31 January 2018 22: 06
            Quote: Guru
            But he does not need frost and humidity. Therefore, it is arctic.

            Not only. He has a very efficient heating system for the fighting compartment and control compartment.
        3. +1
          31 January 2018 13: 08
          They caused trembling and goosebumps at the adversary with one look. In Russian - "frost on the skin" wink drinks
          Hello Valentine hi
          1. +4
            31 January 2018 19: 06
            Salute, Sergey hi Well, I agree with such an interpretation easily! laughing drinks
            1. +1
              31 January 2018 19: 21
              So you and I were there for this service and carried, though not tankers. wink drinks
              1. +4
                31 January 2018 20: 11
                And they seemed to be carrying well, since they were afraid of us laughing drinks
                1. 0
                  31 January 2018 20: 17
                  Here, you think very correctly. Now let them be afraid too. wink drinks
                  1. +4
                    31 January 2018 20: 59
                    As long as we have an army, they will at least respect us. drinks
                    1. 0
                      31 January 2018 22: 21
                      The army must be strong, I'm for it drinks drinks drinks
        4. 0
          31 January 2018 18: 05
          Quote: Doliva63
          And what did they do at the GSVG?

          Tank of the English Channel.
          By the way, the Fritz and other NATO members were very, very afraid of the possibility of being hit with an armored fist. In 62 MSP, in 1990, the Bundeswehr brigade commander examined the TB park, after a buffet, I issued a division commander and regiment, I understand now that you’re 48 hours on the English Channel .
        5. 0
          31 January 2018 22: 04
          Quote: Doliva63
          And what did they do at the GSVG?

          Preparing for the march on the English Channel, through the Arctic.
      2. 0
        31 January 2018 20: 57
        Quote: just explo
        in fact, the T-80BVM is an Arctic tank, the west has no emnip in this direction at all, that is, 80 rivals do not have anything at all.

        And what is less arctic in Abrams?
        1. Alf
          +1
          31 January 2018 22: 36
          Quote: karabas-barabas
          And what is less arctic in Abrams?

          Crew. laughing It is not at all arctic, especially charging.
          1. 0
            7 February 2018 23: 31
            That is, there are no blacks in Alaska, and since only blacks are loading into Abramsya, then Abramsov is in Alaska, that is where it is cold ..
          2. 0
            7 February 2018 23: 32
            By the way, is it really Abrams in the photo? In my opinion this is M-109 ..
  2. +1
    31 January 2018 11: 17
    Overhaul contract with deep modernization of T-80BV tanks between the Ministry of Defense and Uralvagonzavod

    But isn't it with Omsktransmash JSC? It seems that they signed the contract on 24.08.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX?
    Or is it one of several signed?
    1. +2
      31 January 2018 11: 25
      And he is not part of the Uralvagonzavod holding?
      1. +1
        31 January 2018 11: 29
        sort of comes in.
    2. +5
      31 January 2018 11: 30
      Quote: Moore
      But isn't it with Omsktransmash JSC? It seems that they signed the contract on 24.08.2017/XNUMX/XNUMX?

      So Omsktransmash even in the time of KBTM was bought by UVZ.
      Tagil radically solved the problem with a competitor. smile
  3. 0
    31 January 2018 11: 26
    I wonder why such a complex name? Could not just re-designate as the T-80M, for example?
  4. +1
    31 January 2018 11: 31
    I have to admit the fact that we are returning to a situation even worse than the Soviet re-grader in the tank forces. T80, t72, t90, t14 and all this in different versions. Amazingly, in a word. And, if you recall the features of Az 80 to ...
    1. +1
      31 January 2018 17: 51
      on T-72, T-80 and 350 T-90 tanks each is customized with 1 modification.
  5. +1
    31 January 2018 11: 35
    it’s enough to spend money already on modernizing old stuff, this modernization will still be irrelevant in 5-7 years, let the rivets rivet, how much you can pickle a new model, some kind of wrecking
  6. 0
    31 January 2018 11: 38
    Do we have many types of tanks? t 72, t 80, t 90, the armature will soon begin to do, why not focus on 1?
  7. +2
    31 January 2018 11: 44
    I hope the Kantemirovskaya division will receive new tanks first winked
    And then there are the old T-80U only ((at least in the 2012 year it was.
    1. +3
      31 January 2018 12: 40
      Quote: Archivist Vasya
      And then there are the old T-80U only ((at least in the 2012 year it was.

      Now in the Kantemirov tank division appeared T-80BV. Here is a photo from September 2017 year. After the restoration of the 4th Guards Tank Kantemirovskaya Division in 2013, the T-80BV tanks were not equipped, and both tank regiments of the division (12th and 13th Guards) were equipped with T-80У tanks.

  8. +5
    31 January 2018 11: 57
    It is very important to use the full potential in tanks. It is much cheaper than building new cars. Moreover, ultra-modern tanks are far from needed everywhere. The number plays a big role, both with replacement and in case of loss. Money must also be counted.
  9. 0
    31 January 2018 13: 08
    Are there bops with this gas generator? A reactive?
    1. +4
      31 January 2018 19: 16
      Have you seen the caliber? laughing There is nothing to add or diminish. An awl and an awl.
      1. +1
        31 January 2018 19: 24
        Valentine, how so?
        Awl and awl.

        Shiloh is news good And here is the "scrap" wink drinks
        1. +4
          31 January 2018 20: 40
          I agree to a crowbar awl laughing
          1. +1
            31 January 2018 21: 07
            The use of "awl" without restrictions leads to the "crowbar" behavior of the body in the morning. tongue
  10. +1
    31 January 2018 13: 30
    oh, to sell the whole zoo to the Papuans and buy the same type of model ...
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      31 January 2018 14: 11
      Yes, the T-80 is a tank for a particularly cold climate, it's super. 1 No need to pump oil from the BKP 2. No need to heat the engine, there is no cooling system. And if there is an additional gas turbine engine to start the main engine, this is generally a song. Compared to the t-72B3, it looks much better
  12. Hey
    0
    31 January 2018 14: 07
    Improved basic combat qualities such as firepower,

    Explain what this may be? A new gun of a different caliber, an additional machine gun? or a new automatic charger with accelerated charging?
    1. 0
      31 January 2018 14: 18
      Fire control system: wind sensor, TBV. probably the main gunner’s sight, most likely the night’s thermal imager, reinforced armor protection
      1. Hey
        +1
        31 January 2018 14: 25
        and what is firepower?
        As I understand it, the caliber was set to 152 instead of 125, so the power increased flew several kg more explosives. Instead of 7.62 they put 12.7, the extra kg flew. lead. They put a grenade launcher, the same is clear.
        What about the wind sensor?
        1. +6
          31 January 2018 20: 25
          "What about the wind sensor?"
          Che stupid? And how to correct for the wind? Stick out a finger from the hatch? laughing But this sensor, I remember, has always been on the t-80.
        2. 0
          31 January 2018 21: 07
          and what is firepower?
          Two of 125 instead of one at the same time send.
    2. +2
      1 February 2018 22: 33
      Quote: MUD
      Improved basic combat qualities such as firepower,
      Explain what this may be? A new gun of a different caliber, an additional machine gun? or a new automatic charger with accelerated charging?

      The main thing is the SLA. A multi-channel gunner’s sight “Sosna-U” and a television sight-understudy PDT-7151 were introduced.
      Strengthened VLD on the face. On the sides and tower DZ replaced and supplemented by DZ "Relic"
      The 2A46M-4 gun was installed, the loading mechanism was modified to accommodate new types of BPS
      GTD-1250 installed
  13. +4
    31 January 2018 19: 10
    Quote: badens1111
    Quote: Doliva63
    And what did they do at the GSVG?

    Tank of the English Channel.
    By the way, the Fritz and other NATO members were very, very afraid of the possibility of being hit with an armored fist. In 62 MSP, in 1990, the Bundeswehr brigade commander examined the TB park, after a buffet, I issued a division commander and regiment, I understand now that you’re 48 hours on the English Channel .

    Maybe in 64 SMEs? However, maybe we are talking about different things. I’m talking about the "royal", which in 89 was transferred from the 32 GVTD to the 35 Gv MSD, in my opinion. Wünfsdorf, no?
    1. +1
      31 January 2018 19: 28
      Valentine, well, at least it dawned on one that it’s better not to tease the Russians. Moreover, this one already had experience and the answer gave the correct one. good drinks
  14. +2
    31 January 2018 20: 39
    Good car. It is necessary if there was money now to lay the possibility of remote control in all modernized facilities with their maximum automation. Thus, increase their combat effectiveness and make a foundation for the future.
  15. 0
    1 February 2018 00: 33
    Well, not a bad idea.
  16. 0
    1 February 2018 12: 36
    the tank began to meet modern requirements in all basic parameters

    that's what it means ??? What are the main parameters and which are not?
    what requirements? who has ever voiced modern requirements such as mobility of a machine?
    or to the SLA?
    and what are the requirements for firepower? it can be assumed that the tank must pierce all the cars of potential opponents in the forehead, but I’m far from certain that the gun will penetrate Z99, VT4, leopard4, carrot4 into the forehead, the last versions of Abram’s body kit

    sometimes you think - what kind of people produce such meaningless messages