Military Review

Portraits of the century. Vladimir Vysotsky. Until the last second folk

86
Portraits of the century. Vladimir Vysotsky. Until the last second folk



A small preface.

The century is 100 years. We have lived a century, albeit in two different countries. But - have lived. A century is a lot. There were a lot of events and people, and not all of them took their stories a place. We will fix it. We will remind and tell again. While the person is remembered - the person is alive.

Tell me, dear readers from the Soviet era, especially those who are for 50 and above, can you imagine that today we would see the solemn celebration of Vladimir Semenovich Vysotsky's 80 anniversary on TV?

With solemn speeches, presentation of shine, handshake someone from the powerful of this world?

So I do not believe.

I will believe polls VTsIOM 2010 year and FOM 2011-th. More than 17 000 people were interviewed. And Vysotsky in the list “People of 20 century” took the second place. After Yuri Gagarin.

But let's be honest: Yuri Gagarin was a demigod after all. With a charming smile, who had accomplished something until that moment impossible, but beyond. And Vladimir Vysotsky is earthly and intimate.

We flew under God, near the very paradise, -
He climbed a little higher and sat there,
Well, I - reached the ground.


Probably, it is so instituted in heaven: the stars do not smoke. They burn and burn. But - shine and warm.

What is the phenomenon of Vysotsky?



I think it was precisely that he was very earthy. Its in the board and its really for the grave. For all about whom he sang. And really sang a lot about anyone. Soldiers, athletes, sailors, climbers, doctors, prospectors, hooligans, prisoners - the list of heroes of Vysotsky's songs is quite extensive. Everyone found his own, and without exaggeration I can say that the king of reel-to-reel tape recorders was exactly a hoarse voice to the accompaniment of a guitar.

I am lit, accessible to all eyes, -
What should I expect - calm or storm?
I stood up to the microphone as to the images ...
No no! Today, for sure - to the embrasure!


(From the original version of the song "Singer at the Microphone.")

No wonder they say: the people do not cheat. I do not know, they believed someone more than Vysotsky. His popularity among the people was simply breathtaking. If he had been issued on vinyl the way Pugachev had published, another question would be who would have won. But the "samizdat" plowed Stakhanov pace.

Why all? And because the words were honest.

Yes, it is a gift from God, to be able to say so, to put words together, as Vysotsky did. No wonder each listener heard himself in the song. And he believed that the author himself experienced everything he sings about.

Evidence of this - thousands of questions that even had to answer Vysotsky himself.

“People often ask me whether I fought, swam, flew, and so on. Not. I just write in the first person, always say “I”, and this is probably misleading people, they think that if I sing “I” on behalf of the driver, then I was a chauffeur.

All this is not entirely true. In all these things there is a large share of the author’s conjecture, fantasy - otherwise there would be no value too - I saw it with my own eyes, took it, and rhymed it. And no dignity in this, in general, no. Of course, I have come up with a lot of things from everything I sing about you. Although some say that they know it, they know these situations, they have been to them and even the people I sing about, they know very well. I get a lot of such letters. Well, that's nice. ”


Another small retreat. Why did we decide to start a new cycle with Vysotsky on the Military Review? Many will ask such a question, so it is.

Immediately and answer.

And it's in the songs again. In beautiful songs about the war, about which we talk so often. Who better to write? I do not detract from such beautiful songs as “Cranes”, “Victory Day”, “10 battalion”, “Sorry to the infantry”, “Katyusha”, but ...

Each song has its own author and composer. But as many as Vysotsky, few can boast. Fact.

And thanks to Vladimir Semenovich, we flew up like ducks from muddy fields, tore flowers in the neutral zone, went out together against eight, conducted reconnaissance in battle and walked along the rear lines.

And the secret is simple. Vysotsky knew how to look and see, listen and hear. And he had many interlocutors, people who were unequivocally educated and intelligent, who were able to convey the “picture”.

Speaking of the military, it is enough to remember three. Father, uncle and friend.

Junior signaling lieutenant Semyon Vladimirovich Vysotsky, father, accepted his first fight in 1941, near Moscow. And the major Vysotsky ended the war in 1945 in Prague. The colonel retired.

Order of the Red Star, Order of the Patriotic War 1 and 2 degree, medals "For the Liberation of Prague", "For the Capture of Berlin", "For the Defense of Moscow".

For the signalman, who was not particularly spoiled with awards, more than worthy.

Alexey Vladimirovich Vysotsky, uncle, went through two wars: the Soviet-Finnish and Great Patriotic War. Colonel artilleryman.

Three orders of the Red Banner, the Order of the Patriotic War 1 and 2 degrees, two orders of the Red Star. Medals: “For military merit”, “For the defense of Odessa”, “For the defense of Sevastopol”, “For the defense of the Caucasus”, “For the capture of Berlin”, “For the liberation of Warsaw” and others.

Yes, by the way, if you look into the personal affairs of the Vysotsky brothers, there is “nationality” in the column ... Surprisingly, right? This is the question of "sandwiched" rewards and so on. But Alexey Vladimirovich was also published. And very well, because he knew what he was writing about.

Knowledgeable people from SMERSH put his "Mountain Flower" on the same level as the "Moment of Truth" by Bogomolov. And this, you know, is serious.

And Alexey Vysotsky introduced his nephew to the hero of his essay "The Diamond Two", Twice Hero of the Soviet Union, fighter pilot Nikolai Skomorokhov. Skomorokhova's awards are not worth mentioning here, everyone can see the list.

Nikolai Mikhailovich, being a narrator, is no worse than Alexei Vladimirovich, becoming, if not a co-author, then a muse of songs about the sky. And the author’s dedication usually stands against many of them. This is "The Song of the Dead Pilot", and "We took off like ducks ..."

It is impossible in an environment of bright, intelligent and talented people not to reveal talent. And Vysotsky did not just reveal his talent, he polished the diamond to the diamond. With this, I am sure, few will argue.

The second part of the monologue already cited is devoted specifically to military songs.

“And I write about war so much, not because it is a flashback song. You know, nothing to remember, because I did not pass. We are all brought up on military material, I have a military family, there are those who died in the family - as, incidentally, every person has a war that we have touched.

This is such a great misfortune that has covered the country for four years, and it will always be remembered. And while there are still people who are engaged in writing and can write, of course, they will write about the war. But I write songs about the war, of course, not of retrospection, but of association. If you listen to them, you will see that you can sing them today, that people are from those times, the situation from those times, and, in general, the idea and the problem is ours, the present one.

That's because of this, and I appeal to those times simply because it is more interesting to take people who are in the most extreme situation, at the moment of risk, at the next second they can look into the face of death.

I find such people in such situations more often in those times. That's why I write a lot about the war. Don't be fooled by this. I believe that it is necessary to sing now, today, and continue in the future. ”


There is nothing to add, except that very few people managed to write about the war. So, to get to the livers, to the gnashing of the teeth. Vysotsky could.

Yes, he called Bulat Okudzhava his teacher. Yes, Okudzhava has several simply masterpieces of a military song. "Oh, the war, what have you done mean ...", "Here the birds do not sing ...", "Forgive the infantry ..."

But this is a matter of acceptance. Some people like the quiet and unhurried performance of Okudzhava, I now prefer the fierce, on the verge of hysteria, Vysotsky style.

Behind our back at six thirty remained - I know -
Not only the fall, the sunset, but the rise and the rise.
Two wires bare, gritting my teeth, I clean.
I did not see the sunrise, but I understood: it’s about to come!


And after all, these simple songs are relevant and beautiful even today. On a personal example I judge. A few years ago, when I was still working with young in a club, I played a few songs on one of the daily exits. Including "Black pea jackets".

What a surprise it was when, at the next night’s gathering, I was asked to repeat the “ballad about the marines”. The audience was already “made in Russia”, and Vysotsky, what can I say, few people knew from the stories of their parents.

Hooked. Liked. And how could it be otherwise?

We can say that the career of Vladimir Semenovich was not entirely successful. Although the train traveled, and released abroad. There was no main thing - there were no plates (several minions do not count), there was no state recognition in the form of titles and other attributes.

But there was another. There were notices on Hamlet. There were just the plague roles of Lopakhin in "The Cherry Orchard" and Hannibal in the play "How Tsar Peter Arap Married." There were 30 films, many of them with Vysotsky songs.



And there was the role of Gleb Zheglov in the “Meeting Place ...” One of the few cases when the negative hero as a whole became a people's favorite. And the boys of that time fought in the yards for the right to be a Zheglov in the game.

It was. And there were thousands of recordings of his 700-odd songs, distributed on dozens or even hundreds of thousands of Soviet tape recorders.

The state did not recognize the artist Vladimir Vysotsky. But the title "People's Artist" is fully applicable, because the people recognized Vladimir Semenovich as the author and performer of the songs and roles.

And this recognition will not take either time or anything else.

Vysotsky - People's Artist.

The best illustration of this was the funeral. Moscow is hosting the Olympics, the authorities are trying in every way to smooth out any incident that could have a negative impact.

But people were going. And they carried flowers. And they accompanied their Vysotsky on his last journey.



And forgive me, but according to the number of those who accompanied him, Vysotsky could argue with some of the general secretaries.

The last two lines that Vladimir Vysotsky wrote 11 June 1980 of the year:

I have something to sing, presented before the Most High,
I have something to justify before Him.


Undoubtedly. Hundreds of songs written with a soul and sung from the heart, the roles played or voiced by the soul again - will allow.

It is a pity, of course, that so little has been lived, written and played. 42 is not an age. Unfortunately.

But a crazy star fell from the sky -
Right under the heart.


It happened. How did it happen, who is to blame, and how could it be, if it were otherwise, it’s too late to say, and there’s no need.

He started timidly from note to
But I did not finish it, not before ...
Did not sound his chord
And no one inspired.


No! Inspired. It sounds so far. Alive songs of Vladimir Vysotsky, alive memory. 80's birthday and almost 40 years since he left us.



But human memory is alive.
Author:
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. ImPerts
    ImPerts 25 January 2018 06: 07
    15
    His songs are a whole world that can be rediscovered every time. I remember the double vinyl that my father liked to listen to and which on May 9 sounded from all the speakers. And now I periodically occasion Vladimir Semenovich.
    1. siberalt
      siberalt 25 January 2018 08: 17
      +7
      Vysotsky was popular by the recognition of the people, and not appointed from above, of which the legion. Vysotsky - the era and the symbol, and the idol of millions.
      1. antivirus
        antivirus 25 January 2018 08: 28
        +2
        he was only the first to express, he sang time and the aspirations of the nascent urban estate of Russia.
        not bourgeois, but citizens
        resident of the capital - in the forefront of the urbanization of a rural country
        on a visit to god there are no delays
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 25 January 2018 20: 45
        +1
        You didn’t put it right, Vysotsky was precisely the appointed national from the top, only from the very top, and not from our top .. the earth!
    2. Vend
      Vend 25 January 2018 08: 56
      +3
      He was often asked about the authenticity of the songs: did he fly, did not swim, did not sit, etc. To write talent and genius so that people begin to believe that you were there.
    3. andrewkor
      andrewkor 25 January 2018 10: 53
      +3
      A painting by my beloved Russian artist Konstantin Vasiliev. The same genius, not officially recognized, who also left early!
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 25 January 2018 14: 21
        +7
        Volodya (almost the same age) ... human conscience, human truth ... tearing the soul, but he certainly would not want what is now, like Vitya Tsoi, maximalists ... - the conscience of the people ..
        1. Alena Frolovna
          Alena Frolovna 25 January 2018 16: 46
          +5
          We take purity, simplicity from the ancients,
          Sagas, tales from the past dragging,
          Because Good remains Good -
          In the past, future and present.

          V.Vysotsky

          Don't be tempted that I'm rude
          What is not a marble face,
          Chapped lips from the wind
          And a coat that is fashionable on me.
          No no, I'm really talkative
          A vow of silence is not for me.
          Though gray, I do not look like a wolf
          I sing - with sorrow for the country.
          I love with inspiration, hot
          I growl only at my enemies.
          Well, give friends gifts
          With Moscow generosity I’m ready ...
          My guitar has been silent for a long time
          And a thin sail is torn to heart.
          I look at the life of the globe
          From the side ... and repent, repent.
          One thing is encouraging: about the Fatherland
          I composed military songs.
          Worthy, I know, reproachful,
          But he died, as he lived, in Russia.

          *
          I want to ask an open question:
          What name to call
          Those who, living shamelessly full,
          With a hoof hits Mother Russia?

          Archpriest Artemy Vladimirov
  2. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 25 January 2018 06: 11
    22
    If you remember Vysotsky V.S., then:
    "So you read the necessary books in childhood"!
    1. Grandfather
      Grandfather 25 January 2018 14: 33
      +3
      Quote: Uncle Lee
      "So you read the necessary books in childhood"!
      Reply Quote Complaint

      CANCEL ADD COMMENT
      Uncle lee

      yes ...
      1. Andrey Yuryevich
        Andrey Yuryevich 25 January 2018 14: 38
        +2
        Quote: Dead Day
        "So you read the necessary books in childhood"!

        and I...
  3. Amurets
    Amurets 25 January 2018 06: 26
    +7
    No! Inspired. It sounds so far. Alive songs of Vladimir Vysotsky, alive memory. 80's birthday and almost 40 years since he left us.

    Until now, I have kept 4 volumes of his poems. But the tape recordings, those old 60s were not preserved, the film was showered.
    1. andrewkor
      andrewkor 25 January 2018 10: 56
      +3
      There is a collection on two CDs, but also "left", acquired in Yangiabad (Tashkent flea market)!
    2. parusnik
      parusnik 25 January 2018 13: 38
      +5
      http://musicmp3spb.org ....Вот ссылочка, можете скачать, без регистрации, в поисковике сайта наберите Высоцкий, выдаст все альбомы...особенно интересны альбомы Высоцкий Новый звук...Очень интересные работы получились...В основном битрейт 320, там сами разберетесь... hi
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 25 January 2018 15: 01
        +1
        Quote: parusnik
        Vysotsky New sound ..

        Volodya, on the tape, do not compare ....
  4. BRONEVIK
    BRONEVIK 25 January 2018 06: 56
    20
    Idol of Russians number 1
    Read in soap
    On the 2nd and 3rd places - Gagarin and Zhukov, respectively
    1. antivirus
      antivirus 25 January 2018 08: 29
      +3
      these places are more conventional conditional soap.
  5. LeonidL
    LeonidL 25 January 2018 07: 32
    +7
    Earth to you rest in peace Vladimir Vysotsky and Eternal memory to you! As long as your songs sound - you are alive, you are with us! In the car, I always drive Vysotsky's wheels - this is my own, this is forever.
  6. kaban7
    kaban7 25 January 2018 07: 42
    +3
    A bright memory, it would be better if Garik Sukachev says at his concerts - "Long live Vladimir Vysotsky!"
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 25 January 2018 07: 47
    +8
    Alexey Vysotsky is the author of four books of documentary prose on military subjects, including the novels “And May Morning Come” about the Hero of the Soviet Union gunner N. V. Bogdanov, the defense of Odessa and Sevastopol, “Roads of Tierra del Fuego” about the Kerch landing, “A handful of land” "on the defense of Odessa and" Mountain Flower "on the struggle of Soviet border guards with Bandera in the postwar period. A. Vysotsky himself deserves a separate article ... And if we talk about the work of Semyon Vladimirovich, it does not catch, but penetrates the soul .. through and through ...
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 25 January 2018 08: 45
      +6
      I learned new things from the article and comments about the biography of my beloved poet. I myself had read the book ---- Marina Vlady about him.
      It so happened that the favorite records in childhood were 2 big "Alice in Wonderland" ---- a theatrical performance performed by author Vladimir Semenovich and other theater artists. Songs for the play written by Lewis Caroll - +++ Vysotsky --- it is strong! Then I learned and loved other songs and poems for life.
      He is on a par with Pushkin, Mayakovsky and Yesenin. True, I did not read prose all at once. I already wrote about foresight in the verses of Vladimir Semyonovich. Foresight, which was then not understood.
      The article did not like the words about Zheglov. Categorically.
      1. your1970
        your1970 25 January 2018 09: 58
        +7
        Quote: Reptiloid
        The article did not like the words about Zheglov. Categorically.
        -Do you read a book? among Vaynerov he is a sharply negative character - which never appears in books again (it is understood that he was expelled from organs in the future), and Sharapov is present in many ...
        Only Vysotsky’s furious energetics did the opposite - and the hero began to be seen as positive, although even in the film the plot shows him as negative, as exercising arbitrariness.
        1. Reptiloid
          Reptiloid 25 January 2018 10: 17
          +5
          We can’t read the Viners already, but I liked Zheglov on the film. He is in leather, like in a revolution in leather. So I get it. Variations in books and films are common. My childhood to the song "Gleb Zheglov and Volodya Sharapov ...... Yes, the hunchback leader is mocking!" ----- I was a little boy at the concert then, with adults in Yubileiny. Yes, they say, there were some films about Sharapov , but not like that anymore, but didn’t look, something flickered on TV. And I try to watch Zheglova when it happens.
          That would be better arbitrariness Zheglova than Gorbachev!
          1. your1970
            your1970 25 January 2018 10: 38
            +6
            Quote: Reptiloid
            Vinerov not read already
            -why? "Era of Mercy" is in the public domain
            Quote: Reptiloid
            in the film ---- I liked Zheglov. He --- in leather, such as in the revolution in leather. So I get it. Variations in books and films are common.
            -There are practically no discrepancies with the book - except for the finale ....
            Both in the film and in the book, Zheglov was deduced as a negative character, but here the energy and genius of Vysotsky overshadowed everything that his hero does in the film ..
            If you bring all his actions to the realities of today depersonalized - we would say: he’s a bastard, he’s the policeman, he does what he wants - he threw his wallet, tricked Ruchechnik and his partner (the coat was not embassy, ​​7/8 could not be sewn to them in principle in this situation (they obviously did not fall under him)), did not want to understand the Gruzdev case, illegally detained Gruzdev, killed Levchenko
            And we see the eternal already, Vysotsky "I said - the thief should be in prison !!" and we don’t even notice the plot of the film ....
            1. Reptiloid
              Reptiloid 25 January 2018 10: 54
              +2
              What era? What are you talking about? I have 1MB gaps, in the Civil War, in the Second World War. The Weiners' creativity, it might be nice to read from the point of view of how it was then, but how much do they reflect that reality?
              I understood --- the fur coat is 100 %%%% ambassadorial. Yes, to Gruzdev ---- formally, but as I understand it, to the intellectual secured layer --- fashion, theater, although Gruzdev himself is a doctor. Because the subject of the warriors passes, those who live on grocery cards, and on the other hand, those who steal, gobble, steal, do not work, dream of a hog, the world of fashion and restaurants, again. And the wives of Georgia, who? The ladies are disabled.
              1. Knizhnik
                Knizhnik 25 January 2018 11: 35
                +2
                Vysotsky from an “superficial” attitude of Zheglov made an emotional explanatory bias ... he almost convinced
                1. Okolotochny
                  Okolotochny 25 January 2018 12: 43
                  +7
                  Zheglov's “superficial” attitude

                  The “superficial” would never have contacted the bandits. And I would sit through the paper. Dzerzhinsky was also "superficial"? "Red Terror, Bloody Gebnya" and all that.
                  1. Knizhnik
                    Knizhnik 25 January 2018 13: 22
                    +2
                    The hunt is for you to be a fool. I want to say that the character of the book did not seem as deep as the one played by Vysotsky. From the point of view of Sharapov, Vysotsky outplayed the “frivolous” attitude in Gruzdev’s personal rejection as a type. So the whole comment is off topic hi
                    1. Okolotochny
                      Okolotochny 25 January 2018 17: 38
                      +5
                      Yes, I'm not foolish. What Vysotsky did with the image of Zheglov is no question, I consider the CLASSIC of Soviet cinema. For the characters - Sharapov, an intellectual, more or less educated, a native Muscovite. Zheglov - "the three classes of the parish." Comprehended life and profession through their bruises and bumps. And to demand from the character of Zheglov “sincerity and sensitivity” is too much. There was a time like that. Someone "zadubel", "matured." And someone is not. By the way, Gerdt's favorite role. Although he plays a total of about 15 minutes. His monologue for The Era of Mercy is NOTHING.
              2. your1970
                your1970 25 January 2018 12: 51
                +2
                Quote: Reptiloid
                Yes, to Gruzdev ---- formally,
                - now imagine that you in that situation you sew murder and by court order you shot for whose crime you did not commit!!"Formally!!"...

                now about 7/8
                текст
                1. To equalize the value of goods in railway and water transport to state property and strengthen the protection of these goods in every way.
                2. Apply as a measure of judicial repression for theft of goods by rail and water the supreme measure of social protection is the execution with confiscation of all property and with the substitution, under extenuating circumstances, with imprisonment for a term of not less than 10 years with confiscation of property.
                II
                1. Equate in value property of collective farms and cooperatives (field crops, public stocks, livestock, cooperative warehouses and shops, etc.) to state property and in every way strengthen the protection of this property from theft.
                2. To apply as a measure of judicial repression for the theft (theft) of collective and cooperative property the highest measure of social protection - execution with confiscation of all property and with the substitution, under extenuating circumstances, imprisonment for a term of at least 10 years with confiscation of all property.
                III
                1. To wage a decisive struggle against those antisocial kulak-capitalist elements, who use violence and threats or preach the use of violence and threats against collective farmers in order to force the latter to leave the collective farm, with the goal of forcibly destroying the collective farm. Equate these crimes to state crimes.
                2. To apply as a measure of judicial repression in cases concerning the protection of collective farms and collective farmers from violence and threats by the kulak and other antisocial elements, imprisonment of 5 to 10 years with imprisonment in a concentration camp. "
                where you see the property here is railway or collective farm ??? A little brookman with a partner did not fall under this decree in any way, in principle. There is not even a direct theft of state property. This is the plot of the authors to enhance the effect of psychological pressure (illegal!) Exerted by the negative hero of Vysotsky. At that time it was already heard by the older generation and the people understood the nuances. And we heard about the story and believed ..
                1. Reptiloid
                  Reptiloid 25 January 2018 13: 57
                  +3
                  ITS ITS OWN 1970 !!!!!! And if these are plot amplifications of the authors, then why read the book now and why should I call Zheglov negative? We see in the film that he is demanding on everyone. -who are the difficulties and difficulties.
                  What do not say ---- to me Zhiglov, performed by Vysotsky like !!!!! ☆☆☆☆☆ ++++++
                  1. V. Salama
                    V. Salama 25 January 2018 22: 35
                    +1
                    I support. In this case, opponents make a classic mistake: they grab events from a specific historical situation and judge them from the position of today. They forgot that the fight against crime in a difficult time for the country is a war, and in war, all means are good. Moreover, the enemy does not bother with morality either. As in any war, there are innocent victims. We still have the judicial system, what - without marriage works? How - and even with selfish motivation. And at that time, ideology was above the law. So, in principle, and it should be, you can’t write down all the laws. And when there is no state ideology, then even if there is a law, the “devil’s advocates” successfully defend evil.
                    1. Reptiloid
                      Reptiloid 26 January 2018 00: 05
                      +1
                      Yes, Nah, devil’s lawyers, it’s unprincipled for them ---- they can protect anyone, just to pay for the price list services. Only often Russian people think ----- why do I need a lawyer, because it is clear that I am right already? But it turns out, on the contrary ---- it will be condemned.
                      1. V. Salama
                        V. Salama 27 January 2018 04: 14
                        +1
                        Where would they be, these lawyers in the presence of state ideology? And when she is gone, it’s not only the lawyers’s case, but also the judge. How does he conduct the trial in her absence? - based on personal ideas about good and evil; about what is right and what is not; based on the competitiveness of the parties. Moreover, by law, a judge is not required to establish the truth and, in the same subject, the Court does not work twice.
                        Therefore, now we are right not the one who is right, but who is more convincing in the evidence. More convincing is the one whose lawyer is cooler, and the lawyer is cooler than someone who has an administrative resource or who has more money, who can afford a “devil's lawyer”. I also agree that in normal conditions it is advisable to have a lawyer for each side, this follows from the need for separation of functions, which is not an end in itself. There is even such a statement: "the one who is his own lawyer - that client and ... t."
            2. Okolotochny
              Okolotochny 25 January 2018 12: 42
              +8
              And what is Zheglov a negative character? By doing his thing in its place? And how many were there in the whole country? Also negative? A man of his time. It is now easy to judge that "negative." And by the standards of that time?
              1. Knizhnik
                Knizhnik 25 January 2018 13: 26
                +2
                And what is Zheglov a negative character?

                Apparently, this is the case with respect to Sharapov, who says that he will no longer work with Zheglov. But to call a character negative is a bust.
                1. your1970
                  your1970 25 January 2018 16: 15
                  0
                  all the arguments defining Zheglov’s figure - as negative I brought the character above.
                  For those who don’t get it - because of Zheglov Gruzdev (innocent of anything !!!!) would be shot ..
                  And by the way, this contradicts even Zheglov’s formula about “The thief should be in prison !!” - he would be in prison (executed) NOT A THIEFand an honest and decent person ...

                  Watch a movie carefully and read a book
                  1. Okolotochny
                    Okolotochny 25 January 2018 17: 31
                    +6
                    For those who do not get it - because of Zheglov Gruzdev (innocent of anything !!!!) would be shot ..

                    Yes, it doesn’t reach you that NO ONE IS INSURED from mistakes. I watched the film many times, I can retell you. Moreover, I have to do with the activities of Zheglov. It would be negative if it acted in its own selfish interests. Zheglov had awards for the search for criminals. How negative was handed or “by pull”? And the cliché of negativity is nowhere spelled out. Weiners and Govorukhin as well. Everyone evaluates CAM. If the author wrote that: "... in my opinion ..." - there are no questions. It concerns you too. And to make their "high" opinion .... ???
                    1. your1970
                      your1970 25 January 2018 18: 01
                      +2
                      and again, there’s practically no fundamental difference between Zheglov and the Kazansky police department .... Zheglov balances to the point of arbitrariness (by the way, he confirms this when he says that “it doesn’t matter to citizens how he throws a thief”) and he takes a step before the police department ( in which they worked for the stars / disclosure with a bottle of champagne). And this little step is very small - he is already fabricating evidence, he is deceiving Ruchechnik and the company, he is already opposed to Gruzdev and does not pay attention to the contradictions, which is precisely why Sharapov refuses to work with him - and this was by the standards of the time.
                      Sharapov remained in the books of the Weiners - and Zheglov is not there. They don’t part with their favorite characters
                      Once again I say, watch the movie carefully.
                      Exactly for the same thing, policemen are now fleeing from work, or even to jail. Yes, he does not "roof", does not divide the territory, but arbitrariness in his actions is complete. And with respect to Gruzdev this is not a mistake, this is a personal dislike. He doesn’t even listen to Sharapov - who says that everything in the case contradicts Gruzdev’s guilt.
                      Arbitrariness ...
                      Which ultimately leads to the death of Levchenko (who obviously could not escape anywhere from the cordoned off territory - but Zheglov had already sentenced him, he had already decided for himself that there couldn’t be any good in the gang).

                      but the energy and genius of Vysotsky were eclipsed by everything that his hero does in the film .. Well, it happened
                      1. Okolotochny
                        Okolotochny 25 January 2018 18: 56
                        +5
                        Wow what .... right. You make a reference to time. Peter 1 executed his son, ignore him, Suvorov, Potemkin and others owned serfs - villains, the Bolsheviks essentially made a coup. As one of the results of the Civil War, the victims. Let's cover everyone with feces. People, after a hungry homeless childhood, a terrifying war, deprivation, continued to do their job. Someone has matured. As a result of this motherhood, the fate of people sometimes broke. It is easy to reason in satiety, in warmth, lying or sitting on your favorite couch. And the fact that you compared Zheglov with the ghouls - then you have no brains and argue with such a thing no longer.
                      2. your1970
                        your1970 25 January 2018 19: 06
                        0
                        Quote: Okolotochny
                        People, after a hungry homeless childhood, a terrifying war, deprivation, continued to do their job. Someone has matured. As a result of this motherhood sometimes the destinies of people broke.

                        - ready to get a pool in the forehead without guilt - for the fact that someone has matured?
                        Quote: Okolotochny
                        You make a reference to time.
                        -
                        "times do not choose
                        -in them live and die "
                        screwed up to death on the stables of Potemkin, they were apparently happy that they were being torn down at the direction of the master.
                        And with regard to the Okolotnykh - the percentage of survivors after the revolution was very small, even the gendarmes survived more by the age of 20-30. Think about it, why? Why didn’t their people like it so much?
                      3. your1970
                        your1970 25 January 2018 19: 14
                        +1
                        and more
                        Gruzdev’s pistol is legally in his possession (otherwise there would still be a case of weapons). The likelihood that the authorities allowed the doctor to simply own weapons is very small. He is not a high ranking official who owned the weapon precisely by position.
                        The likelihood that Gruzdev was awarded this weapon is quite high. Weapons were not given out just like that - only for serious merits
                        Gruzdev's pistol against the Red Star Zheglova, award against award ....
                      4. V. Salama
                        V. Salama 25 January 2018 22: 57
                        +1
                        Say no fundamental difference, but Zheglov didn’t work for stars and statistics, this is a fundamental difference. Here they say Zheglov had a personal dislike, and therefore he was so "bloodthirsty", let her not be glued to this hero, a clear contradiction in creating an artistic image, and we judge him as a real person. Methodological error is called. In all this, the Weiner brothers have a personal dislike for the hero of Vysotsky. And there is definitely no punishment without guilt. Even now, if the user of the weapon "scatters his guns" with grave consequences, we will see what happens, but of course they will not shoot them.
                2. Okolotochny
                  Okolotochny 25 January 2018 17: 26
                  +7
                  I agree. Exactly.
                  1. Reptiloid
                    Reptiloid 26 January 2018 00: 26
                    +1
                    It happens that the authors, having deduced which hero understand that he does not correspond to anything. And do not withdraw it anymore. It is worth remembering what time the authors wrote .. Zheglov did not correspond to their time. That's what .
                    1. your1970
                      your1970 26 January 2018 08: 15
                      0
                      and Sharapov corresponded? The authors wrote him in 50-60-70, they brought him to the general, they retired him and brought him to consult on difficult matters ...
                      and Zheglov did not correspond - he is the antithesis of Sharapov, he is never mentioned anywhere else and didn’t play him Vysotsky, maybe we would evaluate the film in a completely different way ...
                      Quote: V. Salama
                      And there is definitely no punishment without guilt. Even now, if the user of the weapon "scatters his guns" with grave consequences, we will see what happens, but of course they will not shoot them.
                      - at that time, safes were not required, the gun was stored in a lockable chest of drawers.
                      This issue needs to be considered separately - I don’t know the rules of the then storage of premium (possibly) weapons in individuals
                      1. V. Salama
                        V. Salama 26 January 2018 21: 53
                        +2
                        svoy1970, but it’s not about the safe. Safe and now is not an absolute. Let me remind you: "weapons should be stored in conditions that exclude access by unauthorized persons, ensuring the safety and security of storage ...", this is the limit on the requirements for storing weapons in a temporary residence. As you want, so get out: trouble did not happen - well done, it happened - you will rake in full.
                        But I hinted at something else - as cultural figures, they unconsciously often follow the conjuncture of time to the consumer’s aspirations. Thus participating in an ideological war. They immediately begin to be surrounded by a halo of recognition for the State Department loot. An influence agent, by definition, is not required to know that it is an agent. Weiners wanted to play along with the trends of the day, to show that the Zheglovs could not be good, slandered, blinded a hedgehog, a person who could not be, although it’s me in life and it doesn’t happen. But giving out the quotient as the norm is a vile Solzhenitsyn technique then. Someone stupidly decided to cut down the huskies, as E. Ryazanov, who talked on the TV excitedly about how he mowed from the army, probably regretted later. Whoever cuts purely for the loot without seeing the coast, like N. Mikhalkov, who is at the Besogon station for historical truth, while battles with sticks on machine guns go to the Citadel itself, Stalin ordered.
                3. Okolotochny
                  Okolotochny 25 January 2018 18: 58
                  +6
                  Right. Given in comparison. And he makes each conclusion himself.
              2. V. Salama
                V. Salama 27 January 2018 04: 32
                +1
                A man of his time? And our time too. In the 90s, honest operatives from despair how many bandits were felled from unaccounted for trunks without trial, especially in Moscow? On TV, one high-ranking official of the Ministry of Internal Affairs proudly spoke about this, and did not consider them negative "characters." Although, with ideological diversity, we now have morality and diversity, and everyone has a legal right to the opposite point of view.
                1. Reptiloid
                  Reptiloid 27 January 2018 21: 06
                  +1
                  At the turn of the century, the x / WHITE ARROW appeared. And in 2015 ---- in more detail this topic is already like in the 12th serial .......
    2. Amurets
      Amurets 25 January 2018 12: 06
      +3
      Quote: parusnik
      And if we talk about the work of Semyon Vladimirovich, it does not catch, but penetrates the soul .. through ...

      You did not make a reservation? Semyon Vladimirovich is the father of Vladimir Semyonovich. And what about creativity? Yes, you're right. But I was more hooked by war films in which V.S. Vysotsky was shot: "The White Explosion," "The only way." I write about those films about the war, which, it seems to me, are little known, but V. Vysotsky played really strong people in a difficult situation.
      1. parusnik
        parusnik 25 January 2018 13: 29
        +3
        Of course, I made a reservation ... I wanted to add something about my father, then I decided not to add, in short, it turned out, what happened, and there is a hole in the old woman ...
  8. innoker-1563
    innoker-1563 25 January 2018 07: 50
    +4
    At work, when there was time, I listened to Vladimir Semenovich constantly, now I listen in a car on the way to the country. He taught his grandson to his songs. Vysotsky is a universe, no matter how pathetic it sounds. Cognac sipped for his birthday!
  9. EvgNik
    EvgNik 25 January 2018 08: 02
    +9
    Vladimir Semenovich went through the whole conscious life with a red thread. Not all discs are laid out, just would not fit in the photo.
  10. Soviet Union
    Soviet Union 25 January 2018 08: 23
    +3
    He grew up and looked at the world through the songs of V.S. Vysotsky, good-bad, friend-stranger, decency-meanness all He taught ... (parents are different) .... now if I don’t sing the quatrain I almost don’t listen .. .. he saddened me very much, it would be better if he remained for me a drunkard. Whenever I think about it, my soul hurts ..... to tears.
  11. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 25 January 2018 08: 28
    +2
    I lived and live with Vysotsky and Vysotsky will live with me while I live.
  12. sxfRipper
    sxfRipper 25 January 2018 08: 59
    +1
    Several generations have grown on his songs. The second such is not yet expected. Thank you, Vladimir Semenovich!
  13. thinker
    thinker 25 January 2018 09: 02
    +5
    Once I got to the speech of Vladimir Vysotsky, a memory for life. And numismatists note -
    .23 January, the Bank of Russia issued a commemorative silver coin "Creativity of Vladimir Vysotsky" in denomination of 25 rubles. The issue is dedicated to the 80th birthday of the poet, actor and songwriter and singer. Circulation of 1500 pieces.

  14. Olgovich
    Olgovich 25 January 2018 10: 36
    +4
    Thanks to Roman Skomorokhov for a sincere, beautifully written story about Vysotsky.
    SO could write only deeply loving Vysotsky man.
    Like the author, I respect and love Vladimir Semenovich. This is about Shukshin, but always true:

    Death of the very best -
    And pulls one at a time.
    Such our brother went into darkness!
    Do not run amok and do not miss.
  15. Altona
    Altona 25 January 2018 11: 24
    +1
    Quote: your1970
    Only Vysotsky’s furious energetics did the opposite - and the hero began to be seen as positive, although even in the film the plot shows him as negative, as exercising arbitrariness.

    -------------------------------------
    From the point of view of formal law, this is arbitrary when he threw his pocket wallet to Costa Brick into his pocket. But he knew for sure that Kostya Saprykin was a thief and tomorrow he was robbing another victim, and so that Kostya would not run amok, robbing unhappy women, it would be better if Kostya would sit on government grub for a couple of years and not bother honest citizens. This is actually the “dictatorship of mercy”, when the criminal element had to be cleaned from the streets using the illegal method. Georgy Zhukov, too, did not long tolerate the scope of crime in Odessa, and stupidly used the power with the tools that he had. Therefore, the discord in the actions of Zheglov, given the time, is not visible. Although, I repeat, tossing evidence is against the law, and we all know about it.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 25 January 2018 11: 46
      +1
      Yes, this is the "dictatorship of mercy." That's right. Well, now what? Do not hate, when an old blockade for a pack of oil brought. Moreover, it’s the guards who do not have police rights. Moreover, the network managers themselves have repeatedly said and wrote that they did not set out to expose the old ones. However, for selfish purposes, these disclosures will cause them more damage than loss.
    2. your1970
      your1970 26 January 2018 08: 07
      0
      1)
      Quote: Altona
      From the point of view of formal law, this is arbitrary when he threw his pocket wallet to Costa Brick into his pocket.
      - this is from the point of view of any law (formal, socialist, capitalist
      sky - any) arbitrariness
      2)
      Quote: Altona
      This is actually the “dictatorship of mercy”, when the criminal element had to be cleaned from the streets using the illegal method.
      - when the written law is replaced by "illegal" methods - this is arbitrariness. The first step is when you can throw evidence (Zheglov) for landing Brick (the guilty one), the second step is when you can torture an innocent (ATS "Kazan") for disclosure, the third one is when you can be stunned by impunity (Yevsyukov) to shoot people ... And this all steps on the road to arbitrariness.
      Zheglov takes the third step - he kills Levchenko. He kills simply because he decided so. He doesn’t shoot into the air, doesn’t order the dog to be lowered (which would have caught up with three jumps !!), he doesn’t send several people in pursuit (the main part of the gang is already in the car! Click the lock and that's it) .No ! he himself, long and carefully kisses, snarls from Sharapov, again he kisses and kills ...
      And if shooting during the chase is appropriate and necessary - the criminals know all the chances to leave, then Levchenko has no chance to leave, in principle. That is why none of the convoy / cordon / opera shoots - this impossibility is obvious to everyone
      3)
      Quote: Altona
      Therefore, the discord in the actions of Zheglov, given the time, is not visible
      If Zheglov - honest and decent throws a purse out of good intentions (so to speak for the sake of justice), then Solovyov, sitting in the next office, would have thrown out of careeristic ones, or even out of selfish motives. And this is also very clearly spelled out in the film ....
      The film is not about gangs and cops - a film about the inadmissibility of arbitrariness, the book is not in vain called the "Era of Mercy" and, not in Zheglov's terms, "mercy is a priestly word," but in the understanding that today you spin the law, it seems, for the good and tomorrow?!!!

      Z.Y. The genius of Vysotsky scored all the negativity of the character
  16. Altona
    Altona 25 January 2018 11: 28
    +2
    Quote: Soviet Union
    He grew up and looked at the world through the songs of V.S. Vysotsky, good-bad, friend-stranger, decency-meanness all He taught ... (parents are different) .... now if I don’t sing the quatrain I almost don’t listen .. .. he saddened me very much, it would be better if he remained for me a drunkard.

    -----------------------------------
    An artist, as a troubled man, sometimes consists of continuous mistakes, because his soul is filled with images that sometimes contradict each other. Simply put, psychologically unstable natures, sometimes melancholy. Therefore, many do not live long, burning.
    PS Singer Lyudmila Senchina died. Bright memory to her.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 25 January 2018 11: 53
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      - Psychologically unstable natures, sometimes melancholy. Therefore, many do not live long, burning.

      Truly so. But the core was present in man, but what a! There was a time when various "fighters with the regime" tried to raise the name of Vysotsky on their shield, ranking him as a dissident party. Well, what can I say ... Vysotsky himself answered. In a conversation with foreign journalists (emnip, French) when asked about their attitude to the "Soviet regime", Vysotsky answered (almost verbatim): "I have questions for the authorities, but I will not discuss them with you ..." Verily Poet and citizen.
      1. V. Salama
        V. Salama 25 January 2018 23: 15
        +1
        It would be difficult to discuss these issues with the authorities with anyone else if they had to, since the “four demons of Vysotsky”, tormenting him throughout his creative life, and immortalized in the picture hanging on his desk, were not even members of the CPSU. Correct me if not so, who in the know. After the death of Vysotsky M.Vladi bought this picture from the artist who presented it.
  17. alstr
    alstr 25 January 2018 11: 29
    +3
    They also forgot the song "on mass graves", which IMHO is one of the best military songs.
    I would say that it is among the top five. Victory Day, We will not stand at a price, From the heroes of bygone days, At an unnamed height and At mass graves. They reflect the essence of that war.
  18. Knizhnik
    Knizhnik 25 January 2018 11: 39
    +1
    From childhood I listened to him, because his father adored him. There was a record with "military" songs at home, and therefore the Second World War was represented. What a surprise it was when, being an older man, he learned that he was in 1938 ...
  19. Galleon
    Galleon 25 January 2018 11: 42
    +4
    I began to read the article, I thought: “Well, what else can you say about V.S. Vysotsky? In the soul there are so many things that can’t fit into words ...” The author all fit together very well - the article is like a memory offering, like a salute in front of the grave of a fellow soldier.
    Thank you, Roman!
  20. Altona
    Altona 25 January 2018 11: 50
    +1
    Quote: Reptiloid
    Yes, this is the "dictatorship of mercy." That's right. Well, now what? Do not hate, when an old blockade for a pack of oil brought. Moreover, it is the guards who do not have police rights.

    -------------------------------
    This is a kind of official zeal. These guards need a "percentage of detected thefts." And what is easier how to get to the helpless old woman? Or the controller to drop a stowaway child in the cold from public transport? And after all, no one offered to pay for the ticket. Now everything is focused on the "implementation of the financial plan." People are corporate slaves and their profits.
  21. Altona
    Altona 25 January 2018 11: 55
    +4
    Quote: alstr
    They also forgot the song "on mass graves", which IMHO is one of the best military songs.

    ------------------------------
    Now I’ve read the text of this song again and as if about my grandfather. He is buried near Minsk in the village of Pekalin, Smolevichi district, in a mass grave.

    Here the earth stood on its hind legs,
    And now - granite slabs.
    There is not a single personal destiny -
    All fates are united into one.
  22. ustas - Crimea
    ustas - Crimea 25 January 2018 12: 41
    +2
    I remember my childhood. Tape recorder Dnepr 14A. He joined our family at 7 in the morning and until 12 at night the music sounded. Mostly Vysotsky’s songs. Parents were very fond of listening to him. True, the songs of Okudzhava, Utesov, Novikov, Rosenbavma also sounded. But Vysotsky was respected and appreciated more, so that I grew up on his songs. The eternal memory of Volodya. Remember, listen, and sing his songs.
  23. Okolotochny
    Okolotochny 25 January 2018 12: 46
    +6
    Yes, to modern "leaders" (even presidential candidates) V.S. Vysotsky to the note: "I have questions for my government, but I will not discuss them with you."
  24. Old26
    Old26 25 January 2018 12: 47
    +2
    Quote: Amurets
    Until now, I have kept 4 volumes of his poems. But the tape recordings, those old 60s were not preserved, the film was showered.

    The "nerve" is stored. And with the films, Nikolai is the same trouble

    Quote: thinker
    Once I got to the speech of Vladimir Vysotsky, a memory for life.

    You're lucky. How many times did he dream of being on business trips to get to the Taganka Theater for any performance with Vysotsky’s participation, but alas, it didn’t work out
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 25 January 2018 15: 09
      +2
      Quote: Old26
      The "nerve" is stored. And with the films, Nikolai is the same trouble

      It seems to me, the main thing Volodya is that we remember and love. And it sounds often, and most importantly, young people like it. Recently I was traveling in a minibus and young people on the tablet listened to the military cycle, it seems from the disk "Stars are falling." There was silence in the bus, everyone was listening.
      1. Finches
        Finches 25 January 2018 15: 31
        +6
        The Russian land at every stage of its development has “Our everything”, in its work, science ... It’s not fled to the West, like Bunin, Brodsky, Dovlatov, Solzhenitsyn ..., but those who stayed here with their genius, their problems and shortcomings, with claims of power, but not of the people-in their own country! Pushkin, Lermontov, Tolstoy, Yesenin, Bulgakov, Mayakovsky ..., Vysotsky - so they are not artificially created by advertising, but the true sons of Russia, which the whole world knows about! And there is a true treasure of Russia, no matter how it is called!
        Now everyone is joining the anniversary of the Soviet Poet - Ukrainians, Tajiks ... and even the French! This is the essence of genius - a simple Russian man in 42 years said more than some over the centuries .....
  25. free
    free 25 January 2018 16: 46
    +1
    And I still listen to Vysotsky, good, strong songs.
  26. NF68
    NF68 25 January 2018 19: 07
    +1
    Even among the most talented people, he was one of the best.
  27. Streletskos
    Streletskos 25 January 2018 20: 03
    15
    Talent
    But don't take care of yourself in vain
  28. Bort radist
    Bort radist 25 January 2018 20: 07
    +2
    Do not "measure" Vladimir Semenovich! Do not understand us, do not embrace. Listen to songs and seize the moment when the soul resonates ........
    Oh and how many times, but it's not so guys!
  29. rruvim
    rruvim 25 January 2018 20: 10
    0
    Thanks to Roman Skomorokhov for the "bibliography" of the Vysotsky family. Now it’s clear where he got Frontline songs from. I grew up on Bashlachyov, Revyakin, Selyunin and Sklyar. But my father-in-law carries a full "set" of Vysotsky in the car. And this is something !!!
  30. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 25 January 2018 20: 51
    +2
    I have not read the article (I won’t lie). According to Vysotsky, I have formed an opinion for one hundred years. And my personal respect for this person will never change (my mother thinks the same).
  31. HEATHER
    HEATHER 25 January 2018 23: 14
    +2
    Grew up on his songs. Singer left early. God takes the best early ...
  32. VeteranVSSSR
    VeteranVSSSR 26 January 2018 00: 01
    -1
    1968-69 years. I’m 10 years old and when I saw Lieutenant Brusentsov, I realized that this is the standard of an officer and a person whom I always wanted to be like ...
  33. Bersaglieri
    Bersaglieri 26 January 2018 00: 40
    0
    Vladimir Vysotsky - A Genius!
  34. M. Michelson
    M. Michelson 28 January 2018 05: 14
    0
    A vivid example of the fact that you can untwist even a log.
    The small (albeit talented) coupletist was raised to national genius! "Vysotsky is the prince of Russian culture" / Vic. Erofeev.
    In general, a vile figure. It greatly contributed to the embitterment of Soviet people against the government. The main motive of creativity: "You can’t live like that!" (a la Govorukhin). He managed to find a way to relay the kitchen dissident ideas to the entire worker-peasant country. For which it will always be revered by imperious villains.
  35. garri-lin
    garri-lin 2 February 2018 21: 03
    0
    Vysotsky is childhood. The railway is nearby. Once every few months a “car-club" came. The usual railway carriage and inside the CINEMA. This car stood here for a week, I turned new films. And before the evening session, Vysotsky sounded from a hoarse loudspeaker. Loudly to the whole village. And no one was against.