In Jalalabad, terrorists take hostages in the Save the Children humanitarian mission

20
The next terrorist act (already the third in a few days) occurred in Afghanistan. This time the goal of the terrorists was the humanitarian organization “Save the Children of Afghanistan”, whose office is located in the city of Jalalabad. According to preliminary information, a car in which there were several kilograms of explosive connected to a detonator arrived at the gates of the humanitarian mission.

A suicide bomber detonated an explosive device, which caused the gate to be blown away by a shock wave. The militants who took hostages took to the territory of the humanitarian organization.

A police officer and army special forces moved to the scene. Currently, there is a real battle between the Afghan security forces and terrorists. In this case, the fate of the hostages is not reported.



In Jalalabad, terrorists take hostages in the Save the Children humanitarian mission


TV channel Tolo goes on the air with material that talks about 11 affected during the terrorist attack in Jalalabad.

The human rights structure “Save the Children” has offices in different countries of the world and is engaged in providing humanitarian and legal assistance to children in difficult life situations, including the situation of loss of close relatives.

Recall that a few days earlier, terrorists attacked one of the Afghan hotels, and then attacked the car of the UN mission and took the mission employee and her son hostage.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    24 January 2018 12: 33
    In all the blood shed there, it is the Yankees who are primarily guilty!
    1. +3
      24 January 2018 12: 43
      In fact, the Angles were the first to start there in the 19th century. Since then, blood has been pouring continuously in this cauldron.
      The USSR also climbed for some reason. I still could not understand Brezhnev’s motives, not to take seriously “international duty”, otherwise the USSR would have fought all over the world for a long time.
      But the current Islamic terrorism is really created by the United States. And he is not only pouring blood in Afghanistan
    2. +4
      24 January 2018 12: 47
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In all the blood shed there, it is the Yankees who are primarily guilty!

      The Afghans themselves are to blame. Wrong side chosen. They still remember the USSR, with a kind word. I wanted a Western lifestyle, scared socialism. here is the result. Western life to its fullest.
      1. 0
        24 January 2018 13: 47
        Quote: Wend
        The Afghans themselves are to blame. Wrong side

        and they chose it? -I don’t think ...
        1. 0
          24 January 2018 14: 12
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Quote: Wend
          The Afghans themselves are to blame. Wrong side

          and they chose it? -I don’t think ...

          They had a choice when the USSR was there. In 1978, the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA), which proclaimed the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA), began to rule the country. The organization was Marxist, the country began to build socialism. Different forces opposed the socialist government, but first of all, radical Islamists.
      2. 0
        25 January 2018 04: 56
        I wanted a Western lifestyle, scared socialism. here is the result. Western life to its fullest.


        From now on, in more detail, when did the Taliban and other Mujahideen want a Western lifestyle? belay
        1. 0
          25 January 2018 09: 04
          Quote: rait
          I wanted a Western lifestyle, scared socialism. here is the result. Western life to its fullest.


          From now on, in more detail, when did the Taliban and other Mujahideen want a Western lifestyle? belay

          Do you think the payment of majahideen in rubles was made?
          1. 0
            25 January 2018 09: 59
            It would seem like you are not a Professor, the Russian flag, but answer a question with a question hi

            You were asked a direct question, the second question is off-topic, the first is not the answer.
            1. 0
              25 January 2018 10: 31
              Quote: rait
              It would seem like you are not a Professor, the Russian flag, but answer a question with a question hi

              You were asked a direct question, the second question is off-topic, the first is not the answer.

              In September 1979, another coup d'etat took place in Afghanistan. The head of the party and state was Hafizullah Amin. Through the KGB, the Soviet Politburo began to receive reports that he was an agent of the CIA. At the end of 1979, the UN Security Council was convened. It presented an anti-Soviet resolution prepared by the United States. The document was not supported. The American side, although it did not actually participate in the conflict, actively financed the Mujahideen. The Islamists had weapons purchased in the West. Thus, in fact, the cold confrontation between the two political systems received a new front, which became the Afghan war. The CIA organized several training and educational camps in neighboring Pakistan where Afghan mujahideen (dushmans) were trained. For the Afghan majority (especially in deep provinces with a patriarchal order), Soviet troops have always been invaders. The commoners did not feel any sympathy for the socialist ideology. Will this answer suit you?
              1. 0
                25 January 2018 19: 33
                And again you are responding to another topic. I think everyone knows who prepared the Taliban and supplied them with weapons; everyone saw the photo from the White House.

                The question was absolutely concrete "when did the Taliban and other Mujahideen want a Western lifestyle?" Lifestyle desire and money are two different things. The Taliban and other Mujahideen never wanted a Western lifestyle and advocated Islamic fundamentalism, in the most radical forms. As we understand the Western way of life is contrary to Sharia and Islamic fundamentalism as such. And the fact that they took American money, weapons, collaborated with the CIA does not cancel their ideological orientation.

                Lenin, too, did not disdain foreign capitalist money as well as cooperation with foreign capitalists. But he did not stop being a communist from this.
                1. 0
                  26 January 2018 09: 24
                  Quote: rait
                  And again you are responding to another topic. I think everyone knows who prepared the Taliban and supplied them with weapons; everyone saw the photo from the White House.

                  The question was absolutely concrete "when did the Taliban and other Mujahideen want a Western lifestyle?" .

                  I see you really like playing dead end bird. Moreover, you mix two different Afghan military directions. I did not say anything about the Taliban.
                  Afghan Mujahideen (mujahiddin) - members of irregular armed groups motivated by radical Islamic ideology, organized into a single rebel force during the civil war in Afghanistan in 1979 — 1992. From 1979, they were formed from the local population with the aim of waging an armed struggle against the intervention of the USSR and the “pro-Soviet government regime” exported by the Soviet Union, Babrak Karmal and Najibullah.
                  The Islamist movement that originated in Afghanistan among the Pashtuns in the 1994 year, ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001. and the Waziristan region of northern Pakistan since 2004. IEA was diplomatically recognized by three states: the United Arab Emirates, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia
                  The Taliban appeared after the withdrawal of Soviet troops.
                  Islamists, in addition to American funding, received money from drug trafficking. In 80, this country became the world leader in the production of heroin and opium. Often the purpose of Soviet operations was precisely the destruction of these industries. And under the Taliban, the drug trade was reduced to zero. Taliban broke legs for opium poppy farmers.
                  And the total mass of the population of Afghanistan was illiterate, so that the Islamists easily recruited them against the USSR.
                  The choice of political course is the choice of government or elites. What happened in Afghanistan.
                  And end up playing the dead end bird, I’ll no longer chew on simple truths.
                  1. 0
                    26 January 2018 23: 36
                    I see you really like playing dead end bird.


                    And again, they could not answer a direct question and decided to play "he d u cancer". Apparently it’s so hard for you to admit that you made a mistake in your words that you decided to dishonor prelude. Well, your business.

                    Moreover, you mix two different Afghan military directions. I did not say anything about the Taliban.


                    You didn’t say anything about specific areas, you spoke about Afghans in general, and beyond a certain time frame.
    3. 0
      24 January 2018 12: 53
      Quote: Herkulesich
      In all the blood shed there, it is the Yankees who are primarily guilty!

      Amendment, colleague, not only there, but everywhere practically. A smelly striped sting sticks out from under each baseboard. It seems that they are sleeping with the Bible under the pillow, but all the same, unchristen.
      "Behold, I am coming soon, and My retribution is with Me, to give to everyone according to his deeds." .
  2. +3
    24 January 2018 12: 46
    And where are the vaunted American specialists and special services. They have been sitting in this country for 17 years, and apart from protecting themselves and poppy plantations, they are not doing anything. "Democratized" the country to the handle.
    1. +2
      24 January 2018 12: 49
      rotmistr60 Today, 12: 46 New
      And where are the vaunted American specialists and special services.

      Guarding the fields with foolishness ...
    2. +1
      24 January 2018 12: 51
      Sho you. sho you ... they are busy de-e-elom, so white and profitable !! Business, nothing personal!
    3. +1
      24 January 2018 13: 48
      Quote: rotmistr60
      And where are the vaunted American specialists and special services

      so they do it.
  3. +4
    24 January 2018 12: 57
    I propose to blame the terrorist attack on the United States: the Taliban grew up, destroyed the real state power, and covered the drug business. Direct causal relationships. It is not that it is unproven to blame Russia for the Barmalean provocations with chemistry in Syria.
    1. +1
      24 January 2018 13: 49
      Quote: Alex-a832
      I propose to blame the terrorist attack on the United States

      accepted ... entrusted ... then what? they don’t care your opinion.
      1. 0
        25 January 2018 10: 11
        If to entrust with what is essential, then it would be ... but again it would "turn out" !!! "partners" no matter how!