China called on Russia to resist the US together

130
Beijing and Moscow should stand up to pressure from Washington together, said the military attache of the Chinese embassy in Russia, Major General Kui Yanwei.

China called on Russia to resist the US together




At a meeting with Viktor Bondarev, Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Defense and Security, Kui Yanwei noted that in the new Pentagon strategy, China and Russia are seen as threats to the United States.

The USA and the Western countries in the European part restrain Russia, and in the Asian part restrain China
- noted the military attache.

In his opinion, Moscow and Beijing need to jointly counteract global threats, as well as “challenges from the United States and its allies,” in order to ensure security not only in their regions, but throughout the world.

Also, the Chinese diplomat added that the experience of enhancing the combat training of the Russian army will be useful for the People’s Liberation Army of China, since the last operation of the Russian Armed Forces in Syria proved the increased level of combat training of the Russian army.

The combat experience of the Russian army is of great importance for the combat training of the Chinese army.
- said Kui Yanwei.
130 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    22 January 2018 13: 20
    With all our pleasure - please, always, so that you won’t be like a night before
    1. +39
      22 January 2018 13: 21
      It remains that China would show us an example smile And then everyone strives to “refrain” as it comes to the specifics.
      1. +6
        22 January 2018 13: 25
        Wow! What a news! And what have we been saying to the Chinese for the last half century?
        1. +26
          22 January 2018 13: 28
          The Chinese simply saw that we, too, could abstain and they did not like it!
          1. +9
            22 January 2018 13: 52
            It is necessary to be very careful with China, their original concept - “to confront together”, can be substituted at any moment.
            1. +6
              22 January 2018 14: 23
              Quote: cniza
              It is necessary to be very careful with China, their original concept - “to confront together”, can be substituted at any moment.

              Most likely that it will be framed. More precisely, they will marry and abandon. China is now ramping up energy supplies from the states, and the Siberian Force is trolling. It seems that they will merge with the states in ecstasy rather than honestly be friends with Russia. And all these Kuevs (derivative on behalf of Kui) phrases are nothing more than blackmailing Americans.
              1. 0
                22 January 2018 15: 19
                So they take their grandmothers from the States.
              2. KCA
                +7
                22 January 2018 15: 23
                Of course, deliveries of LNG carriers from the United States are several times cheaper than gas from the pipeline, right? China is not Ukraine, overpaying for gas every 5-10, for the sake of love, the United States will not, and the "Power of Siberia" another 3 months ago went halfway to China
                1. +2
                  22 January 2018 16: 11
                  Quote: KCA
                  Siberia "another 3 months ago was halfway to China

                  It’s not interesting for these commentators, they constantly ask: “What about the power of Siberia? We met him! The Chinese threw us!” fellowI have to show photos, look, they built Yes China understands that it needs us and more and more is moving towards rapprochement.
            2. +1
              22 January 2018 23: 46
              Well, with such a notch - Kui, and even Yan ... Straight senior Iglesias with a Chinese accent. :-))
        2. +22
          22 January 2018 13: 38
          Quote: Shurik70
          Wow! What a news! And what have we been saying to the Chinese for the last half century?

          A wise monkey "descended from a palm tree, realizing that a dragon and a tiger can fight for a long time, and bananas on a palm tree are already ending. laughing
          1. +14
            22 January 2018 13: 46
            this monkey’s bananas, just the most, are already so fat that it’s hard for her to sit on a branch
            1. +3
              22 January 2018 13: 55
              since such a fatty let it start to move, it won’t be able to contemplate from the side, it was written by Sherkhan as a dish, so let it fuss and carry chestnuts and bananas for itself))
          2. +2
            22 January 2018 13: 54
            Yes, no ... it’s just that the monkey realized that the dragon can fly and the monkey can easily get out, and the tiger climbs beautifully on the tree .. so the wise monkey, after sitting for a thousand years, realized that we needed to choose an ally, and since we are at hand .. that’s better we ...)))
            1. 0
              22 January 2018 16: 32
              Quote: igorka357
              ... a wise monkey, after sitting for a thousand years, realized that it was necessary to choose an ally, and since we are close at hand .. it's better we are ...)))

              In addition, our bananas are cheaper, and fangs are no worse.
          3. +2
            22 January 2018 14: 22
            The dragon and the tiger will share the forest, and the monkey will remain so on the palm tree ...
        3. 0
          22 January 2018 14: 09
          Let them try to pull the chestnuts out of the fire. And then strove for someone else's back. It is clear that we need to act together, but for a long time they swayed. And the specifics are not visible.
          1. +2
            23 January 2018 00: 05
            Quote: seti
            And the specifics are not visible.

            Pancake! Found a "diplomat"! Military Attache! This is to coordinate the military-diplomatic relations between the two countries, and does not at all determine the country's foreign policy ... But nevertheless, the symptom is positive. Apparently, Comrade Xi gave the go-ahead .... Otherwise, I would not have said it aloud what I said!
            IMHO.
        4. 0
          22 January 2018 19: 59
          Strange news, the PRC has a large part of the economy focused on the American market, a lot of dough goes to the USA, and they want to "eat fish and not get dirty with tar!"
      2. +20
        22 January 2018 13: 32
        Quote: Black
        It remains that China would show us an example smile And then everyone strives to “refrain” as it comes to the specifics.

        The Chinese know that our elite is very hooked by the Americans and for this reason they are afraid .. Here the Communists will come to power, then China will cooperate more actively with us
        1. +8
          22 January 2018 13: 37
          Quote: Svarog
          Here the Communists will come to power, then ...

          But what, should they? ... Their engine is already that ... tu-tuuuuu ...
          1. +11
            22 January 2018 13: 46
            Quote: Black
            Quote: Svarog
            Here the Communists will come to power, then ...

            But what, should they? ... Their engine is already that ... tu-tuuuuu ...

            I am sure that the Communists will still be in power, but rather the Socialists .. Communism is a beautiful, but utopian idea, and socialism is the only thing that will help your children to avoid slavery. If you do not belong to the elite. All money, power, and more will be concentrated in the hands of thieves, then their children ... and if we add the development of inform. technologies, then 80-90% of the population will work for a penny on these individuals and will not even be able to utter a peep, since everything is under control ..
            1. +5
              22 January 2018 13: 48
              Quote: Svarog
              Communism is a beautiful but utopian idea,

              I agree to all 100%
              and if you add the development of inform. technologies, then 80-90% of the population will work for a penny on these individuals and even will not be able to utter

              Already something like that ....
              I am sure that the Communists will still be in power, but more precisely, the Socialists
              I definitely won’t live up to these times ..
              1. +13
                22 January 2018 13: 55
                Quote: Black
                I definitely won’t live up to these times ..

                Vote for Grudinin, you need to actively support the only sane candidate, if there is a second round, then it is not a fact that Putin will win. And so, already 45% are ready to vote for Grudinin, it’s true there was a poll with Solovyov, but still ..
                1. +7
                  22 January 2018 13: 58
                  Quote: Svarog
                  if there is a second round, then it is not a fact that Putin will win.

                  Svarog? what are you talking about ?. Of course, I’m not a wang, but I think GDP in the first round with a result of 72-74%. The mustache has already been decided ...
                  1. +9
                    22 January 2018 14: 03
                    Quote: Black
                    Quote: Svarog
                    if there is a second round, then it is not a fact that Putin will win.

                    Svarog? what are you talking about ?. Of course, I’m not a wang, but I think GDP in the first round with a result of 72-74%. The mustache has already been decided ...

                    Perhaps it’s decided .. But you need to try .. Vote, we’ll see. Although I look zomboyaschik and understand that probably yes, everything is decided. They already drew 75% to him. But I look at my surroundings, the circle of friends, there are very few people who want to vote for Putin, out of 10 people, I’m ready to vote for Putin and this is mostly women)) They love with their ears)) Yes, and radio polls show that Putin is far from 1% ... moreover, they conducted a survey with Solovyov ..
                    1. 0
                      23 January 2018 07: 29
                      Sorry, but why do you think that your environment is the opinion of everyone else. In my surroundings. among acquaintances and friends, all for Putin. because others are just laughter. Yes, there are 2 who are always for Zhirinovsky. So no one drew anything. Everyone just has their own choice.
                2. +12
                  22 January 2018 14: 02
                  Good day!
                  And what will he do? Will remove some from the feeder and put others? Can you forget to unveil more lards?
                  1. +6
                    22 January 2018 14: 33
                    Quote: Labrador
                    Good day!
                    And what will he do? Will remove some from the feeder and put others? Can you forget to unveil more lards?

                    He has a program where he describes step by step what is planned to be done. Here check out https://www.liveinternet.ru/users/5014098/post428
                    058175 /
                3. +10
                  22 January 2018 14: 12
                  Grudinin is not a communist. He was in Yer and Yabloko and was attached to LDPR. Yes, and he has sclerosis.
              2. The comment was deleted.
              3. +4
                22 January 2018 13: 56
                Quote: Svarog
                [Here the Communists will come to power, then China will cooperate more actively with us


                There were already - "you can’t enter the river twice."
                1. +6
                  22 January 2018 14: 05
                  Quote: cniza
                  Quote: Svarog
                  [Here the Communists will come to power, then China will cooperate more actively with us


                  There were already - "you can’t enter the river twice."

                  Why? There were communists, but now socialists .. so all the rules ..))
              4. +8
                22 January 2018 14: 15
                And Thu will change, There will be a party nomenclature instead of the oligarchs. like before. and then again they will betray both the country and their party. Why not one communist did not go out to defend the USSR and the CPSU. and how many were in the country. and who we have become the first oligarchs. former communists from the Central Committee and the top of the Komsomol. . No thanks. Another collapse of the country
            2. +5
              22 January 2018 13: 56
              That communism would be revived .. a very bloody war is needed, the rallying of the people precisely in the circle of their homeland .. and without war communism-socialism will never come to power .. forget it!
              1. +4
                22 January 2018 13: 58
                Quote: igorka357
                That communism would be revived .. a very bloody war is needed, the rallying of the people precisely in the circle of their homeland .. and without war communism-socialism will never come to power .. forget it!

                Why is it so radical .. although maybe you're right .. Just like that, thieves will not give up power from us ..
                1. +13
                  22 January 2018 14: 05
                  Ofiget is a “communist" Grudinin with 7 lards in foreign accounts, how is it different from the current thief? Party card color? am
                  1. +10
                    22 January 2018 14: 26
                    I’m definitely never going to choose it, seeing how the bulk players harnessed for it, it’s a new corrupt “anal” one, everything can be seen from the comments. which changed all the parties ...

                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHzEuwSkJHk
                  2. +6
                    22 January 2018 14: 35
                    Quote: Vik66
                    Ofiget is a “communist" Grudinin with 7 lards in foreign accounts, how is it different from the current thief? Party card color? am

                    Well, first of all, by the fact that he honestly earned money and he gives his workers life.
                    1. +6
                      22 January 2018 14: 42
                      Honestly, you won’t earn such money, you don’t have to hang noodles on your ears, there are not children here.
                  3. 0
                    22 January 2018 15: 29
                    Mr. Grudinin has no part. ticket! So his interests. And the Communist Party of the Russian Federation has lost its credibility. They could not find a worthy candidate from the ranks of the Communist Party. Or Zyuganov did not want a competitor.
          2. +3
            22 January 2018 13: 57
            Yes, and the communists tu-tu, the current against the real pathetic fake for nothing but dusting the brains are not good.
        2. +1
          22 January 2018 13: 42
          They are more tied to the United States, and if the current Communists come to power, then there will be no one to cooperate with.
        3. +2
          22 January 2018 14: 12
          Quote: Svarog
          The Chinese know that our elite is very hooked by the Americans and for this reason they are afraid .. Here the Communists will come to power, then China will cooperate more actively with us

          When the Communists were in power, China did not cooperate very actively, to put it mildly
      3. +11
        22 January 2018 13: 38
        In the seventies, China asked the United States to confront the USSR together. And he did it well. lol
      4. +5
        22 January 2018 14: 31
        Quote: Black
        It remains that China would show us an example smile And then everyone strives to “refrain” as it comes to the specifics.

        "... but there is BRICS, because there is Russia and China; finally,
        there is an alternative project for global and Eurasian development of China, as many as two silk
        ways - land and sea, so to speak, China "on land and at sea." Not really worth it
        flatter yourself. Although China remains outside Tran Pacific, this, however, does not mean
        his conflict neither with her nor with the USA. The author of "Multiplying ..." specifically emphasizes that,
        At first, China and the United States are not long-term strategic adversaries,
        and Xi Jinping categorically refuses to enter into alliances with anyone
        against the USA
        ; secondly, a certain part of the American elite in the face of a decline
        US political and financial opportunities, their de facto defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan
        Nistan and the failure in North Africa, the PRC is seen as a regional (Central
        Naya Asia, part of Southeast Asia) subhegemon. Hopes for the deployment of wide
        the headquarters ("global") conflict between China and the United States is clearly exaggerated, but both Chinese
        “Silk roads” (land and sea, especially the first - “Chinese Eurasia”) can
        become a means and zone of joining two world projects of a multinational corporation cluster called
        The "USA", or rather, the world’s elite as a whole, whose clans will agree by building three
        world zones, almost according to Orwell, only Oceania from west and east covers Eurasia,
        divided into Eurasia and Ostasia proper. Do not forget that China since the end of 1970-
        's was largely a Rothschild project, and for all its significant
        art and autonomy fits perfectly into the Western global project, carrying out a number of
        very important functions for Western elites. As for the topmost clans like this,
        for example, the bourgeoisie and aristocracy did in Europe after the revolution of 1848, the upper
        clans are always ready to declare a "water truce", and only those who do not belong to them
        cry in case of violation of the rules by blood, sometimes - for several generations
        (the story of the Kennedy clan, which defied the Olympians, is very instructive in this regard). "

        A.I. Fursov
        Reading Elena Larin: marginal notes
        (instead of the foreword)

        So in the long run, the Chinese and I are not on the road. In general, their power is extremely exaggerated, the Chinese have immeasurable problems and it is not difficult for the Americans to fill up the Chinese (the Chinese know about this). Another thing is that Merikos does not need this, in principle, they are happy with everything. They do not doubt the loyalty of the Chinese, which is not unfounded. But Russian people really spoil the whole world "raspberry".
      5. 0
        22 January 2018 15: 13
        Slowly ripen. All the same, while politically Russia is much more serious than China, we should have developed the economy. But this is unfortunately in the distant future. “Friends” are happy with everything, so they are unlikely to invest money in the development of the country.
    2. +5
      22 January 2018 13: 22
      We will see. But China cannot be trusted in any case. They are developing at an insane pace. Consequently, they will need the resources on a large scale that Russia has (timber, gas, oil). It is clear that they will not fight openly for resources, but China’s quiet, creeping expansion into Siberia and the Far East cannot be ruled out. Kui Yanwei is that name. There are definitely no typos?
      1. +1
        22 January 2018 13: 24
        Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
        There are definitely no typos?
        - The most fighting name. Papa was Russian, however ...
        1. +3
          22 January 2018 13: 36
          Beijing and Moscow should stand up to pressure from Washington together, said the military attache of the Chinese embassy in Russia, Major General Kui Yanwei.
          Major General .. Kui says business ... Yes
          1. 0
            22 January 2018 14: 32
            And in South America, kui is a fried guinea pig. wink
            Yurich, welcome hi
      2. +2
        22 January 2018 13: 58
        They don’t need expansion to Siberia .. we already sell wood and gas to them ... why should they climb here?
    3. +7
      22 January 2018 13: 44
      US with Western countries in the European part restrain Russia, and in the Asian part restrain China
      th - noted military attache.

      Finally, it even reached the Peking duck on the 2865th day that the stripes deliberately split all sorts of alliances between China and Russia, singly and more easily. Yes
      1. +2
        22 January 2018 14: 28
        The wise monkey lowered only the TAIL from the tree !!! And now the question is, will it be possible to pull it off this tall tree ??? or rests, like waved and that's enough !!!
  2. +4
    22 January 2018 13: 21
    Just a statement of fact. The whole world has already understood this.
    1. +5
      22 January 2018 13: 23
      Everything is not easy with China.
      In his opinion, Moscow and Beijing need to jointly counteract global threats, as well as “challenges from the United States and its allies,” in order to ensure security not only in their regions, but throughout the world.
      This phrase can mean both a call for strategic partnership and nothing at all.
      1. +4
        22 January 2018 14: 06
        The Chinese general has one more phrase - "The combat experience of the Russian army is of great importance for the combat training of the Chinese army"
        And we need it?
        1. 0
          22 January 2018 14: 15
          Quote: Reserve officer
          And we need it?

          As soon as some kind of power begins to feel "Over", it blows away, of its own importance ..... Russia has such a fate. put disease in place
          1. +2
            22 January 2018 17: 39
            It’s completely for you. Russia is the same ambitious part of world domination. And history proves a little the opposite. Even in your commentary you unreasonably claim that its fate should be put too far into place. And how? Or does its opinion in world politics make you listen to it?
      2. +2
        22 January 2018 14: 15
        Quote: Chertt
        This phrase can mean both a call for strategic partnership and nothing at all.

        I add that this can be part of the bargaining with the states. Like, see Trump, we can also agree with Russia.
        1. +2
          22 January 2018 15: 07
          In short, we do not believe the yellow-faced brother ???
  3. +3
    22 January 2018 13: 22
    In short, Russia should not have freedom of action, but strictly follow wise instructions from Beijing
    1. +1
      22 January 2018 13: 43
      Quote: Cartalon
      In short, Russia should not have freedom of action, but strictly follow wise instructions from Beijing

      This is what you deduced from such a conclusion? In short, it will not pass in short, justify, in the article, not a hint.
      1. +4
        22 January 2018 14: 09
        From the fact that Russia is talking about Chinese politics, and not China about Russian, we have already lost a special relationship with India.
        1. +1
          22 January 2018 14: 23
          This is just your opinion. In general, it does not correlate with the meaning of the article. And about India, I think this is speculation.
    2. +2
      22 January 2018 13: 46
      Russia should bear in mind that it is necessary to talk with friends not downward, but on equal terms. For this, you may need to sit down. But you never have to kneel. Neither in front of friends, nor in front of enemies all the more ...
      soldier
    3. +1
      22 January 2018 13: 58
      What kind of crazy thoughts ..))?
  4. +4
    22 January 2018 13: 22
    Beijing and Moscow should stand up to pressure from Washington together, said the military attache of the Chinese embassy in Russia, Major General Kui Yanwei.
    Not even a century has passed .... how did the monkey decide to go down from the tree ... What did you think in 2014?
    1. +6
      22 January 2018 13: 34
      Quote: svp67
      Kui Yanwei.
      You be careful with these names .... You never know what ....
      1. +4
        22 January 2018 13: 40
        Hello Vladimir! It’s also not clear to me where the moderators are looking?
        1. +7
          22 January 2018 13: 42
          They can easily remove the whole article!
          1. +4
            22 January 2018 13: 43
            Together with the author lol
        2. 0
          22 January 2018 13: 52
          Quote: pvv113
          It’s also not clear to me where the moderators are looking?

          What's the problem? You, that since the days of the USSR, the singer Julio Iglesias was not familiar? Or do you think that when we pronounce his name, we should all blush a lot?
          1. +1
            22 January 2018 14: 45
            Sergey, hi Yes, just the other day a wave of punishments for two letters swept across Lavrov, So they are afraid, who is also interested in receiving the "order" for the Chinese general? request
          2. +7
            22 January 2018 14: 59
            Quote: svp67
            Julio Iglesias

            In Spain, there was such a custom: At birth, the birth water was poured out the window, and as they responded, they called the child. Therefore, they have such names: Julio, Juan, Juanito, Conchita, Pedro! lol
            1. +1
              22 January 2018 15: 20
              Quote from Uncle Lee
              Therefore, they have such names: Julio, Juan, Juanito, Conchita, Pedro!

              Funny ...
              Quote from Uncle Lee
              There was such a custom in Spain

              Almost...
      2. +3
        22 January 2018 13: 42
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        You be careful with these names ...

        This is his and his parents PERSONAL problems ...
        1. +7
          22 January 2018 13: 47
          Well, thank God ! It doesn’t concern us. Or maybe it translates from Chinese as "Glorious son of his father." We don’t know, ignoramuses ....
          1. +2
            22 January 2018 15: 22
            Quote from Uncle Lee
            We don’t know, ignoramuses ....

            I’ll tell you more, there is such a kind of armor that we call KUYAK, and so in the original source, in Mongolian it sounds HUYAG. Well, the ancestors corrected, so that it would sound more harmonious and that, now we will condemn them for this.
            1. +1
              22 January 2018 20: 13
              Sergei hi You, as a moderator, have clarified this. And then punishments arrive, for example, for the word “aphid” (botanical petty mischief), and not just “order”, but a weekly “bathhouse”. And to whom to turn for justice? So we are afraid that he will fly again. For some, this can be fatal. And amnesty or the removal of punishment over time - does not shine. This is not spelled out in the rules. That's how it is. request
              1. +1
                22 January 2018 20: 15
                Quote: Svarog51
                And to whom to turn for justice?

                As the rules say: "To the site administration"
                1. 0
                  22 January 2018 20: 48
                  Are moderators an administration? I apologize if the question is stupid, I still do not understand the hierarchy of the site. recourse
                  1. 0
                    22 January 2018 20: 53
                    Quote: Svarog51
                    Are moderators an administration?

                    Alas, not all. But the whole administration is moderators ...
  5. +3
    22 January 2018 13: 24
    Both Russia and China have long had to declare their main enemy mattress, and not hide behind the words "partner, companion."
    1. 0
      22 January 2018 17: 45
      Well, Russia’s okay, but why is this to China ??? this is their main employer. They won’t shit in their own pocket, just for the sake of messing with a neighbor.
  6. +2
    22 January 2018 13: 25
    Such informal cooperation with some obligations in the image and likeness of clause 5 of the NATO charter may be useful. Like, joint coordinated actions of the armed forces under the interim command of the joint headquarters after approval by the senators of the Russian Federation.
  7. +2
    22 January 2018 13: 25
    What did the ice break? Didn’t it?
  8. +2
    22 January 2018 13: 25
    They also need to be prepared and battle experience to pass on. If only it was not necessary to fight for them!
    1. +2
      22 January 2018 14: 00
      they only think about entom, because they know that they themselves cannot solve this problem
  9. +3
    22 January 2018 13: 26
    Beijing and Moscow must counter Washington pressure
    It is high time. They just started talking about it when they finally realized that regardless of the volume of trade from the United States, they would still try to crush China.
    The combat experience of the Russian army is of great importance for the combat training of the Chinese army.
    It is reasonable to learn from the experience of others and taking into account the mistakes of others. But their own could run in Syria.
    1. +1
      22 January 2018 13: 40
      Well, if we and China unite against America, the Yankees will definitely lose sleep.
      1. +4
        22 January 2018 14: 02
        You just do not forget that the United States at the click of a finger will bring down the economies of both China and Russia, of course they will also sink to the bottom .. but they have stanochki, they will quickly rise from their knees, and again we will only rise for 25 years, not to mention straightening! And another factor that comes second if the United States concentrates all of its forces against China and Russia combined, and it’s not a fact that we will win, after all, the US armed forces are a very powerful machine ... plus any other mongrel from NATA!
        1. +3
          22 January 2018 14: 43
          Quote: igorka357
          if the United States concentrates all its forces against China and Russia combined, and it’s not a fact that we will win, after all, the US Armed Forces is a very powerful machine ... plus any other mongrel from NATA!

          Not real, utopian and stupid. They didn’t break the ridge of such a machine, and the mericosa is now far from being in shape. And indeed, nobody there, except frankly insane, does not consider armed confrontation with the Russians, because firmly know that this venture is meaningless from the word "completely." Moreover, the "color" technology brings success - why change something? It is easier to sniff with venal authorities and to steer Russia with their hands in their own interests, which actually happens after the collapse of the USSR and the coming to power of the Enbn’s bailout with its collaborative accomplices.
          1. 0
            22 January 2018 17: 49
            When the cars broke the ridges, then the dialogue was different, and the country also had opportunities. Well, and frankly, the last time when they broke the ridge, it seems that it was not in one person that it did not do without help.
    2. +2
      22 January 2018 13: 43
      Quote: rotmistr60
      But their own could run in Syria.

      This is the most efficient offer. For example, to bring a small squadron to the shores of Syria, or to try out some kind of association of ground forces on the territory of the SAR. So it will be more visible to friendship ... what
  10. +3
    22 January 2018 13: 27
    Yes, we, as it were, have long been with the states in the counter ... Although, of course, such an ally will not hurt us, if only we would not limit ourselves only to words ...
  11. +1
    22 January 2018 13: 28
    and pulls on pathetics, together we are Strength !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. 0
    22 January 2018 13: 46
    Well, finally ripe.
  13. +2
    22 January 2018 13: 47
    .
    ... the experience of increasing the combat training of the Russian army will be useful for the People’s Liberation Army of China, since the last operation of the RF Armed Forces in Syria has proved the increased level of combat training of the Russian army.

    Ashes, and who did not allow their special forces to send to Syria, the latter would not mind.
  14. 0
    22 January 2018 13: 49
    We will be like in the film "back to back"))
  15. +3
    22 January 2018 13: 52
    stop Kui Yanwei is a very cunning person. He wants to put to sleep our vigilance.
    I BELIEVE every beast, and I LOVE him a hedgehog.
  16. 0
    22 January 2018 14: 00
    Is China scared? NWF then he will be better off than Russia. But together ... The US, on the contrary, has nothing to catch laughing
  17. +4
    22 January 2018 14: 03
    "Moscow, Beijing - friendship forever" - the slogan of the 50s. Friendship was real. Khrushchev made a crack, which the United States immediately skillfully took advantage of. Now the main, not voiced, task of the Anglo-Saxons is to prevent a new rapprochement between Russia and China.
    The fate of the USSR would surely be different if not for Khrushchev.
  18. +10
    22 January 2018 14: 11
    Something is not believed, a signal to the Americans, no more.
  19. +4
    22 January 2018 14: 21
    ... said Kui Yanwei

    The idea, so to speak, is not new, and has already been expressed by Chinese officials.
    By the way, something tells me that the name of the Chinese diplomat ... is somewhat distorted, so to speak.
    1. +1
      22 January 2018 14: 53
      Roman, welcome hi
      the name of the Chinese diplomat ... somewhat distorted

      This thought visited everyone who read the article. wink I also have a version - this is how it sounds in Chinese Casanova. lol
      1. +4
        22 January 2018 16: 19
        Quote: Svarog51
        This thought visited everyone who read the article.

        I studied in the same group with the Vietnamese at one time.
        By the way, we called them precisely "Chinese."
        That's why the thought came laughing
        1. 0
          22 January 2018 20: 17
          And in our country, in the late 80s, Vietnamese girls were taken to the plant. It was so funny to go home on the tram to return in the company of these "panamas" hung with purchases. good
    2. +1
      22 January 2018 14: 57
      Quote: Golovan Jack
      ... said Kui Yanwei

      The idea, so to speak, is not new, and has already been expressed by Chinese officials.
      By the way, something tells me that the name of the Chinese diplomat ... is somewhat distorted, so to speak.

      Definitely distorted! True, in different cases they distort in different ways. One will be written as Hong Sen (Prime Minister of Cambodia), the other as Kui Yanwei ... And the name is the same! bully hi
      1. 0
        22 January 2018 22: 59
        Quote: andj61
        True, in different cases they distort in different ways.

        and the name of the Chinese minority is generally distorted into "hui" laughing
  20. +2
    22 January 2018 14: 33
    The Chinese are very pragmatic. But only a few countries can afford independent policies. And we need to make the most of this for ourselves.
  21. +2
    22 January 2018 14: 33
    "Moscow and Beijing need together ... ... to ensure security not only in their regions, but all over the world"...

    This is the essence of the statement ...
    Just don’t need to involve Russia in this matter, but by yourself - just a little aside ... If you push the adversary, then right away, together, and China has much more opportunities in this regard than Russia ... Show an example , guys, first of all - economically .... And you don’t need to feint with Russia, waiting for moments convenient for yourself ...
  22. +1
    22 January 2018 14: 56
    Quote: oldseaman1957
    Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
    There are definitely no typos?
    - The most fighting name. Papa was Russian, however ...

    Kui - Chinese last name (clan). The modern meaning of the hieroglyph is "steep"
  23. +2
    22 January 2018 15: 02
    Damn right this is Chinese KUI laughing
  24. +1
    22 January 2018 15: 19
    Well, to interact to resist is necessary. There are only two buts
    1. The Russian elite is unlikely to be able to consolidate resistance to the United States.
    2. Russia should always remember its interests, China is only a fellow traveler.
  25. 0
    22 January 2018 15: 23
    It’s not just words and not with our hands ... but they themselves will stand aside ..... and we don’t mind.
  26. +1
    22 January 2018 15: 51
    In no case ... Russia should be neutral between the confrontation between China and the United States.
    1. Maz
      0
      22 January 2018 17: 28
      For us, the main thing for border guards is that several thousand kilometers of border crossing points will be with a good neighbor. EW, that a huge chunk of land will not be sowed by American bases, missiles, planes, radars. Air defense will be able to concentrate forces in other areas. Strategic Missile Forces will transfer a bunch of targets to real potential enemies. The VKS will redirect a lot of satellites to the areas of the planet that are more necessary for monitoring. About trade and say nothing. God forbid - not simple words. Only the above draws hundreds of billions of dollars in profit and cost savings.
    2. 0
      22 January 2018 17: 49
      "to be neutral" is already a bit late.
      Moreover, the “between” is where the legs grow and where the back ends.
      And there Russia was already in the 98th.
  27. 0
    22 January 2018 17: 44
    It’s hard not to agree. Or maybe stupid ...
    We must wait for the list from the United States. Maybe someone will carry ...
    Gref for example.
  28. +1
    22 January 2018 18: 12
    "said the military attache of the Chinese embassy in Russia, Major General Kui Yanwei." ///

    This is a relatively shallow fry. He should not say anything else in his own way.
    posts.
    And tomorrow, Trump again flies to Beijing, concludes contracts for $ 100 billion in half an hour ...
  29. +2
    22 January 2018 18: 14
    First, China must recognize Crimea as Russian (RF). I have the honor.
  30. +1
    22 January 2018 18: 28
    The Chinese are extremely cunning. Back in 2014, the prerequisites appeared that China would use Russia as a “useful idiot”. And now, apparently, they took up work in this direction.
    1. 0
      22 January 2018 19: 17
      Quote: Ronald Reagan
      And now, apparently, they took up work in this direction.

      Much earlier...
  31. 0
    22 January 2018 20: 02
    In fact. on the one hand, the United States, and on the other, their obvious opponents: Russia, China and North Korea. To ensure that the latter are guaranteed to each of them survive at hour X, they are doomed to unite.
    1. 0
      22 January 2018 23: 16
      And someone just refuses the brothers named, you are no one to us and call you not like us.
      We have a brother who has more dollars, shoba fat bulo. Yes, I remember the times when the blood was thicker than water, the United States textbooks retrained you.
      Yes, tight deal with such neighbors.
  32. 0
    22 January 2018 22: 56
    Moscow and Beijing need to counteract global threats together

    Sorry, but isn't that the basis of Chinese politics - "no military alliances"?
  33. 0
    22 January 2018 23: 12
    Quote: Svarog
    Quote: Black
    Quote: Svarog
    Here the Communists will come to power, then ...

    But what, should they? ... Their engine is already that ... tu-tuuuuu ...

    I am sure that the Communists will still be in power, but rather the Socialists .. Communism is a beautiful, but utopian idea, and socialism is the only thing that will help your children to avoid slavery. If you do not belong to the elite. All money, power, and more will be concentrated in the hands of thieves, then their children ... and if we add the development of inform. technologies, then 80-90% of the population will work for a penny on these individuals and will not even be able to utter a peep, since everything is under control ..


    That’s exactly the situation in Europe right now, you’re plowing for bagatas and all the money is written out in advance for housing, insurance and a car, family, housing, unemployment, retirement, death, etc., etc. you need to (must / must) .
    And the same amount remains in the corman as before the salary. 0, but if there is more left, then there are taxes. Have fun living everywhere!
  34. +1
    22 January 2018 23: 59
    This version is also possible. McCain recently voiced a proposal that states need to open a big war within the next 4 years, no later, and at the same time you need to start it with the military suppression of China. It will be easier to do than with Russia, and taking into account that the overwhelming majority of the Chinese population lives in coastal zones, the main military-industrial potential of their country is also concentrated there. With the suppression of China, the industrial part of Russia, which now covers 70% of its needs at the expense of Chinese products, will also weaken. Then you can take on Russia. This speech by McCain certainly did not pass by the ears of the Chinese leaders, and they instructed the military attache (not a big "lump") to carefully probe the ground of the idea of ​​a defensive alliance. The leaders themselves are not "smearing" it.
  35. 0
    23 January 2018 07: 56
    The whole world must take on counteracting mattresses. America is the true empire of evil.
  36. 0
    23 January 2018 09: 16
    Leave Nadia waiting for everyone coming in. \ Y. Temporary? No . Yesterday, the Law Enforcement System of Ukraine! - refused to fulfill official duties.
    The case of Krapotkino - lives and even the anthem can receive "The Lord respects us" (the decision will be tomorrow at 7:33.
    Before the verdict in Ukraine 111 days.
    Be ready ! Ynatipak? **