Belarus has received a new batch of Chinese armored cars

67
As the VoenTV television channel of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus reported, on January 18 of 2018, a second batch of Chinese light armored vehicles CS / VN3 Dajiang, delivered to the Belarusian armed forces by means of military assistance from the Ministry of Defense of China, was flown to Minsk by a transport plane flight from China.

Belarus has received a new batch of Chinese armored cars




Recall that the first batch of five CS / VN3 armored vehicles handed over by the Chinese side was delivered to Belarus 20 June 2017. These five vehicles then underwent trial operation in the battalion of the 361 Security and Service Base (CEL) of the Ministry of Defense of Belarus, taking part in the West-2017 exercises. According to unofficial sources, the whole of China plans to transfer the 30 to Belarus of these machines, which have received the name "Dragon" in Belarus, writes the blog bmpd.

The CS / VN3 armored vehicles were developed and mass-produced from around the year 2013, part of China North Industries Group Corporation (CNGC, better known as Norinco) by Chongqing Tiema Industries Group Co. (Plant No. 256) in Chongqing. Machines CS / VN3 in various versions in relatively small quantities are in service with the PLA and the People's Armed Police of China, however, Belarus is the first known foreign recipient.

67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    19 January 2018 10: 57
    in the manner of military assistance from the Ministry of Defense of the PRC.
    Why would the Chinese help Belarus with military equipment? Trying to get into the market? or some other goals?
    1. 0
      19 January 2018 11: 00
      transferred to the Belarusian armed forces through military assistance

      What is it like? For nothing, what?)))) Lukashenko snatched here too)))) well done, what can I say ...
      1. +2
        19 January 2018 11: 37
        Quote: KVU-NSVD
        in the manner of military assistance from the Ministry of Defense of the PRC.
        Why would the Chinese help Belarus with military equipment? Trying to get into the market? or some other goals?


        I think the Chinese want to gain control over the western part of the Silk Road as a result

        1. +1
          19 January 2018 12: 19
          Quote: bulvas
          I think the Chinese want to gain control over the western part of the Silk Road as a result

          Nonsense.
          1. +4
            19 January 2018 12: 38
            China is slowly increasing its presence in Belarus. This is not good.
            1. 0
              19 January 2018 13: 27
              Some of these armored cars in the photo ...
              Narrow-eyed
              belay
    2. +10
      19 January 2018 11: 02
      They don’t look at the gifted horse. If only he had not turned out to be a Trojan. smile
      1. +4
        19 January 2018 11: 07
        Belarus has received a new batch of Chinese armored cars
        I don’t even know how to react ... request little brothers, what is it?
        1. +4
          19 January 2018 11: 11
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          I don’t even know how to react ... bros, what is it?

          Yes, calmly respond. In principle, it is their business, what and from whom to buy. request... After all, by the way, we also buy something. Including and the United States, and Italy, and France .... i.e. in countries included in NATO. smile
          1. 0
            19 January 2018 11: 19
            Quote: Black
            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            I don’t even know how to react ... bros, what is it?

            Yes, calmly respond. In principle, this is their business:
            yes so it is ... but the sediment remained ...
          2. +2
            19 January 2018 12: 28
            Quote: Black
            it's their business what to buy from whom

            Duc, if I were to buy ...
            transferred to the Belarusian armed forces through military assistance from the Ministry of Defense of the PRC.
            And then, after all, here it is. what
      2. +11
        19 January 2018 11: 31
        As for the Trojan horse, you correctly noticed hi Why are there only one Chinese tied loans, where the Chinese are building in Belarus for themselves, with their materials and people, only at the Belarusian expense. Here Lukashenko outwitted himself, which he soared recently laughing
    3. +2
      19 January 2018 11: 07
      Quote: KVU-NSVD
      Why would the Chinese help Belarus with military equipment

      In 2014, when the agreement on military assistance was signed, there were also a lot of “what for” questions in the sense of why this is to China. We decided that this is an advertising move, as well as innate Asian cunning
    4. +2
      19 January 2018 11: 12
      What is there to discuss? Give - take, beat - run. winked
    5. +6
      19 January 2018 11: 23
      Somewhere wept, here they get it.
    6. 0
      19 January 2018 12: 12
      And climb the market, and other goals
  2. 0
    19 January 2018 10: 57
    The mustached one wants to show that Belarus does not depend on Russia.
    1. 0
      19 January 2018 12: 43
      He has already shown ... Result: with the giants of the auto industry of Belarus - MAZ, BELAZ big troubles
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    19 January 2018 10: 57
    Chinese marketing.
  5. +5
    19 January 2018 10: 58
    MAZ plant that he can’t build himself? Or Belarusians so steal technology from the Chinese? If they can’t, then I am ashamed of MAZ.
    1. +7
      19 January 2018 11: 04
      If they give, why not take
      1. +2
        19 January 2018 11: 25
        Quote: Lex.
        If they give, why not take

        good Iron logic! laughing
        1. +1
          19 January 2018 13: 14
          Quote: Dym71
          Quote: Lex.
          If they give, why not take

          good Iron logic! laughing

          iron, jewish logic
      2. 0
        19 January 2018 11: 30
        Quote: Lex.
        If they give, why not take

        It depends on what they give wassat
    2. +2
      19 January 2018 13: 05
      So you also need to buy from your own. And when a penny nyama, then the Chinese will do.
    3. +1
      19 January 2018 14: 13
      Quote: RASKAT
      MAZ plant that he can’t build himself? Or Belarusians so steal technology from the Chinese? If they can’t, then I am ashamed of MAZ.

      it’s good that Belaz was not mentioned. Imagine a Belaz-based SUV.
  6. 0
    19 January 2018 11: 01
    In a collision with Matiz armored car can not be restored?))
    1. +2
      19 January 2018 11: 16
      Quote: Million
      In a collision with Matiz armored car can not be restored?))

      You can certainly go to bed, but the bodice, skyworths, xiaomi, meise is already a serious quality and an affordable price. I’ve been trying for a month now to find differences between Samsung and skyworths and what I find not in favor of the Samsung. Although we have everything at an exorbitant price, xiaomi released a 50 inch 4k smart TV, the price in China is 370 ye, in our region it is 800-900 ye if not more expensive .. Crackers.
      1. +1
        19 January 2018 11: 46
        I have Lenovo A859 for 3,5 years plowing without complaints, I am pleased with it. I bought for 7990 rubles. So the Chinese have already got the hang of doing quality things.
        1. 0
          19 January 2018 12: 20
          Quote: Kot_Kuzya
          I have a Lenovo A859 already 3,5

          Lenova is a former AyBieM..in China ..
          1. +2
            19 January 2018 12: 33
            Well let it be. I’m thinking of buying a new phone, and looking in the direction of Xiaomi and Meizu. Friends who have Meizu and Xiaomi recommend them, they are completely satisfied with them. I see no reason to overpay for the Samsung brand or even more so iPhone.
            1. +1
              19 January 2018 13: 31
              Quote: Kot_Kuzya
              Well let it be. I’m thinking of buying a new phone, and looking in the direction of Xiaomi and Meizu.

              Yes, in general, it's a normal smart, I recently bought a simple xiaomi redmi 4a for my needs for the eyes and it's not so bad to drop it Yes
              1. 0
                19 January 2018 14: 37
                Quote: activator
                , I recently bought a simple xiaomi redmi 4a for my needs

                Xiaomi is written, and Xiaomi is read without the letter K, by the way, I have “Redmi 4 Pro” with 60 GB on board!
          2. 0
            19 January 2018 20: 04
            Quote: dvina71
            Lenova is a former AyBieM..in China ..

            nonsense, complete nonsense, there is only the ThinkPad line from IBM, and with every year the quality of ThinkPads is falling steadily, the jambs of the conceptual plan have already gone, I’ve sat like with the T420 so far I haven’t found anything, I don’t even consider new models, I don’t I want to suffer then with overheating. About Akum generally keep silent. And so I look at used five hundred previous generations with a normal cooling system and reinforced batteries.
        2. 0
          19 January 2018 14: 39
          Quote: Kot_Kuzya
          I have Lenovo A859 for 3,5 years plowing without complaints, I am pleased with it. I bought for 7990 rubles. So the Chinese have already got the hang of doing quality things.

          The Chinese themselves fly into space, build a second aircraft carrier, etc., and even the armored car is normal for them all the more so to do without problems.
      2. +1
        19 January 2018 22: 55
        [quote = activator] [quote = Million] ... the price in China is 370 ye, we have it in the region of 800-900 ye if not more expensive .. Crackers. [/ quote]
        No, dear, this is a normal colonial policy, when your industry is ruined and in exchange they sell to you what you have made at a higher price. And what amphibians did at the Lutsk plant ?! Where are you gone? And the Buddha knows him.
    2. +1
      19 January 2018 11: 30
      Armored BelAZ would have looked more epic
  7. 0
    19 January 2018 11: 08
    And that their power will not pull such light armored cars riveting ...?
    Although as they say, freebies and vinegar are sweet ... But if it’s really freebies, then the Chinese respect, a tricky marketing move.
    1. +1
      19 January 2018 11: 18
      Quote: gukoyan
      And that their power will not pull such light armored cars riveting ...?

      Perhaps the Belarusian army has small needs for these armored vehicles, it’s difficult and expensive to create your own armored car, it is not cost-effective and not efficient, so it’s cheaper to buy ready-made, all the more cheap Chinese.
      1. +1
        19 January 2018 11: 43
        Quote: RUSS
        therefore, it’s cheaper to buy ready-made, especially cheaper Chinese.

        And even more so here, as I understand it, generally for FREE. True, later the Chinese can compensate for this with service and spare parts.
        1. +1
          19 January 2018 12: 20
          Quote: Piramidon
          Quote: RUSS
          therefore, it’s cheaper to buy ready-made, especially cheaper Chinese.

          And even more so here, as I understand it, generally for FREE. True, later the Chinese can compensate for this with service and spare parts.

          It is unlikely that it would be for nothing, especially among the Chinese, I will certainly sign for us that this is a present, and that so Lukashenko promised them or already gave them in return, the question .....
          1. +1
            19 January 2018 12: 24
            Quote: RUSS
            Hardly for nothing

            Well, I judged by the keywords from the article: "pass" and "as military assistance."
    2. 0
      19 January 2018 12: 22
      Quote: gukoyan
      And that their power will not pull such light armored cars riveting ...?

      And how many bullets do RB produce per year? How many heavy machine guns?
  8. +2
    19 January 2018 11: 17
    Why are you like children ?! MAZ will certainly pull and will be able to make any armored jeep, only for this it is necessary to invest in its development, in production facilities ... Is this necessary in order to make 100 or 200 pieces of such armored cars ?! I don’t think ... And then they just give it for free, why not take it ...

    By the way, the armored cars are quite decent, there is at least bulletproof protection ... Eh, we would have been like in Chechnya when there was an active phase of the extermination of terrorists, we would have saved more lives, but for some reason nobody helped us ...
    1. 0
      19 January 2018 11: 31
      Can BelAZ just pour concrete
  9. +1
    19 January 2018 11: 17
    Quote: RASKAT
    MAZ plant that he can’t build himself? If they can’t, then I am ashamed of MAZ.

    And for VAZovtsev, UAZovtsev and GAZovtsev you, like, not ashamed? )))
    1. +1
      19 January 2018 11: 22
      Quote: Anyone
      And VAZovtsev and GAZovtsev you, like, not ashamed? )))

      they also have to do armored cars?
      1. +4
        19 January 2018 11: 34
        Isn't the Tiger a GAZ model?
        1. +1
          19 January 2018 11: 45
          those same “Vodnik“ and “Combat“.
  10. +1
    19 January 2018 11: 21
    Cool crossovers
  11. +1
    19 January 2018 11: 38
    Umm, why not the Tigers?
  12. 0
    19 January 2018 11: 51
    I do not understand why these armored cars are needed? What is the tactic of their application? Niche in the army? To carry generals and colonels in the war zone? Ever since the WWII of the country, they refused armored cars, the swan song in the Red Army was BA-64, then the Soviet leadership from BA transferred to the armored personnel carrier, even BRDMs are now made on the basis of armored personnel carriers. And the Germans even before 1939 abandoned the BA and switched to the concept of semi-tracked armored personnel carriers. Particularly touched by the open turret for the machine gun, the machine gunner is a guaranteed suicide bomber, well, is it really impossible to put a light turret like in the BA-64?
    1. 0
      19 January 2018 12: 33
      Quote: Kot_Kuzya
      Particularly touched by the open turret for the machine gun, the machine gunner is a guaranteed suicide bomber,

      Well, so we touched right up to the BTR-60, i.e. as many as 20 years after the war, they threw all the caps.
      1. +1
        19 January 2018 12: 37
        And what's the point of repeating the mistakes of the 20-30s? Tukhach did a lot of things with his nonsense about the "armor of the 27th century", allocating funds from the so meager budget for the production of tanks and BA with cardboard armor. But how many trucks and tractors could be made instead of these thousands of useless T-26, T-XNUMX, BA and BT?
  13. 0
    19 January 2018 11: 58
    Yesterday everyone was glad that Russia was supplying arms to China, and today China was supplying Belarus.
  14. 0
    19 January 2018 12: 05
    Quote: RASKAT
    MAZ plant that he can’t build himself? Or Belarusians so steal technology from the Chinese? If they can’t, then I am ashamed of MAZ.

    With MAZ some sadness ...
  15. +1
    19 January 2018 13: 02
    What is there to comment on? FUNNY, Old Man completely turned into a beggar. Previously, Belarus itself tried to make military equipment, especially since it has its own auto industry, and now it walks and takes Christmass laughing
  16. +1
    19 January 2018 13: 15
    Kiai armored cars in Belarus is an epic fail!
    Joseph Vissarionovich, forgive us foolish ...
    1. +1
      19 January 2018 14: 34
      Quote: Shuttle
      Kiai armored cars in Belarus is an epic fail!
      Joseph Vissarionovich, forgive us foolish ...

      VAZ was created thanks to Italians, KamAZ built on an American loan, etc., and so what?
      1. 0
        22 January 2018 15: 38
        And that! Look at the map.
        And VAZ, and KAMAZ made on its territory.
        With armored cars all wrong.
  17. 0
    19 January 2018 15: 51
    C400 systems already on Chinese chassis
    1. 0
      19 January 2018 19: 59
      Quote: kamski
      C400 systems already on Chinese chassis

      Why not immediately on horses then?
  18. 0
    19 January 2018 16: 03
    For chewing gum, he sold his friendship, sucks a Chinese candy .. rides on Chinese armored vehicles. Chinese member to his rescue .. this is political prostitution !!
    1. 0
      20 January 2018 00: 43
      Well, pay for friendship. laughing
  19. 0
    19 January 2018 16: 58
    And can it be the pi line of the Comintern, or what?
  20. 0
    19 January 2018 17: 44
    At this rate, the Chinese will soon begin to sell armored vehicles to Russia.
  21. 0
    20 January 2018 00: 48
    .... offered ... the first dose for free ....