Military Review

During the implementation of project 636, Varshavyanka stole 100 million rubles?

34
Another fact of fraud with the means of the state defense order was revealed by the investigating authorities. This time we are talking about embezzlement in the framework of the 636 "Varshavyanka" project, which was implemented by the "Admiralty Shipyards".


Information Service RIA News publishes information that the RF IC is seeking the taking into custody of the deputy chief engineer of the enterprise. He is suspected of involvement in the theft (inefficient spending) of 100 million rubles.

During the implementation of project 636, Varshavyanka stole 100 million rubles?


The statement of the head of the press service of the St. Petersburg court Daria Lebedeva is given:
The funds were stolen during the development of the Varshavyanka submarine project. The Oktyabrsky District Court received applications for the arrest of Gleb Emelchenkov (deputy engineer of the Admiralty Shipyards) and Valery Pshenichny, a shareholder of the NovIT PRO company. Both persons involved are suspected of fraud on a large scale as part of an organized group.


It is known that the investigation believes that the cost of work on the development of the three-dimensional model of the hull, the submarine equipment, and the digitization work necessary for the implementation of the project documentation are overestimated.

The fact of theft or the absence of such a fact will now establish the court.
Photos used:
MO RF
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Dormidont
    Dormidont 18 January 2018 15: 04
    10
    Effective managers do not waste budget funds. They master them
    1. Vladimir16
      Vladimir16 18 January 2018 15: 18
      +2
      Rather, someone wants to slow down production with the help of investigative measures. And here they don't make bicycles.
      Interesting phrase at the end of the article
      The fact of theft or the absence of such a fact will now establish the court.


      If the fact of theft has not been established, then what is the purpose of the investigative measures?
      1. oldseaman1957
        oldseaman1957 18 January 2018 15: 23
        10
        The most disgusting thing is that if someone is punished, then so-so, not for the edification of others. And around a bunch of castles are built on "honestly" earned. Let's go, like into some endless swamp!
        Yes, it's hard to live in times of change ...
      2. 73bor
        73bor 18 January 2018 20: 19
        +1
        The fact of the matter is that the boats were built super-fast, this is not "Grena" to torture, we have idiots both in the investigative bodies and in the law-making bodies, who composed a bunch of idiotic laws! - Make the fool pray to God and he will break the "dick" !
      3. Ratmir_Ryazan
        Ratmir_Ryazan 18 January 2018 20: 30
        +1
        This is a preliminary investigation, and the court establishes guilt !!!
        In your opinion, since they make submarines, they are also allowed to steal hundreds of millions ?!
        1. 73bor
          73bor 19 January 2018 01: 15
          +2
          Do you at least take an interest in what the chief engineer is doing in such an enterprise, and does he have such a money supply at all !?
  2. Vladimir16
    Vladimir16 18 January 2018 15: 05
    12
    to theft (ineffective spending)
    so you decide, sir, you sleep ... or or ineffectively spent.
    And how can trackers determine this effectively or not effectively? The boats are built. So the funds were used for their intended purpose.
    Someone wants to hook someone.
    Instead of working as a deputy chief engineer, he will now deal with garbage. And snoopers will rummage in computers and interfere with all their fuss.

    I understand zenith arena! The budget has been exceeded many times and by tens of billions. Is there a fact of exceeding the budget or not? The boats are in formation, the barmaleevs are being pushed with rockets.
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 18 January 2018 15: 15
      +5
      Quote: Vladimir16
      And how can trackers determine this effectively or not effectively?

      If paper clips for documents cost 100 million 15 rubles. Investigators can assume that 100 million was spent ineffectively)))
    2. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 18 January 2018 15: 48
      10
      Quote: Vladimir16
      Instead of working as a deputy chief engineer, he will now deal with garbage. And snoopers will rummage in computers and interfere with all their fuss.

      I especially liked that the deputy! Just like that, without the knowledge of the chief engineer, he quietly sawed money.
      It is known that the investigation believes that the cost of work on the development of the three-dimensional model of the hull, the submarine equipment, and the digitization work necessary for the implementation of the project documentation are overestimated.
      Well, this is generally difficult to prove. As a person dealing with complex three-dimensional models, I can say that it is very difficult to evaluate here. It all depends on the weaving of the model, if you wish, you can concoct it in 5 minutes, and if a complete model, with all the filling, then there is no limit to perfection, again, the trial and error method has not been canceled - it is unlikely that the competence of the investigators will be enough to establish this!
      In general, Admiralty Shipyards is one of the few shipbuilding enterprises that have worked well and continue to work. The contract for 6 Varshavyanka for the Black Sea Fleet was completed on time, a new contract for 6 units for the Pacific Fleet was received, and this is where history began. Perhaps they simply did not roll back to someone, under the current government it is impossible without this ...
    3. APASUS
      APASUS 18 January 2018 19: 32
      +3
      Quote: Vladimir16
      so you decide, sir, you sleep ... or or ineffectively spent.

      When, for example, a manager with a salary of 30 thousand rubles moves to a car for 60 thousand $ It is checked elementary, there would be a desire.
    4. nik-karata
      nik-karata 19 January 2018 08: 42
      0
      The boats are built. So the funds were used for their intended purpose.

      Well, after all, the Vostochny cosmodrome was also built ....... recourse
  3. AUL
    AUL 18 January 2018 15: 05
    +6
    Why doesn't this news surprise me?
  4. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 18 January 2018 15: 06
    0
    We need a demonstrative flogging, with real terms, fines, so that others moderate their appetites
  5. Herculesic
    Herculesic 18 January 2018 15: 10
    +4
    Just as always, they didn't share with anyone! And so, if they shared the money, then no one would ever, and would not know anything!
    1. ltc35
      ltc35 18 January 2018 15: 15
      +1
      The one "whoonado" decided to take revenge in this way. And order money usually plugs holes in enterprises. Holes cannot be closed without orders. Now you need to wait for the court decision.
  6. ioan-e
    ioan-e 18 January 2018 15: 19
    +4
    For the life of me, I don't believe that the deputy. the chief engineer stole (ineffectively spent) 100 million rubles. without the knowledge of the management! The bosses are blind, deaf and stupid, or just another scapegoat @ zel?
    1. StobbeS
      StobbeS 18 January 2018 16: 36
      0
      You are most likely right, but I can quite imagine that he muddied up within the framework of his responsibility. My boss, for example, has no idea what I'm doing at work, he has his own worries.
      1. ioan-e
        ioan-e 19 January 2018 11: 05
        0
        Exactly until the hand reaches for money where it is not necessary)))))
    2. nik-karata
      nik-karata 19 January 2018 08: 44
      0
      I do not believe that the deputy. the chief engineer stole (ineffectively spent) 100 million rubles. without the knowledge of the management!

      Do you remember how you disposed of money and land in Rosoboronprom without Taburetkin's knowledge !!! wink
  7. _Jack_
    _Jack_ 18 January 2018 15: 23
    +1
    During the implementation of project 636, Varshavyanka stole 100 million rubles?
    naive, much more
    1. nik-karata
      nik-karata 19 January 2018 08: 45
      0
      This is just what they found !!! smile
  8. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 18 January 2018 15: 29
    0
    Oh, and it will be difficult for the court to prove it. It is practically impossible to achieve reliable expertise. wassat
    1. Dedall
      Dedall 18 January 2018 19: 09
      +1
      Yes, in Soviet times, each letter of project documentation had an exact price. It was easy to make estimates then.
    2. _Jack_
      _Jack_ 19 January 2018 21: 22
      0
      on the one hand, yes, but on the other hand, to call our courts completely objective and independent from anyone will not turn the tongue, there will be a command from above - they will sue without examination
  9. Rusland
    Rusland 18 January 2018 15: 37
    +8
    One gets the impression that if we end the embezzlement of budgetary funds, then secret documents will be used.
  10. Serving the Fatherland
    Serving the Fatherland 18 January 2018 15: 42
    +3
    Brad .... I very much doubt that the deputy. Chief Engineer, Signatory and Financially Responsible! That's what the GUI is for! Even if there was some kind of scam, for example, he brought this contractor and they had a verbal agreement to increase the cost of the contract and the subsequent rollback to the deputy, hell investigators will prove it! Such transactions are not carried out through banks!
  11. afrikanez
    afrikanez 18 January 2018 16: 18
    0
    I wonder how much of the stolen will be announced at the end of the construction of the Crimean bridge? There the sums should not be small "mastered"!
  12. axiles100682
    axiles100682 18 January 2018 16: 36
    0
    Hmm. 100 million in total? It was also unclear whether the predation was or was not, whether it was ineffective or not.
  13. Overlock
    Overlock 18 January 2018 18: 19
    0
    Quote: ltc35
    The one "whoonado" decided to take revenge in this way.

    if Serdyukov didn’t leave Boss’s daughter for Vasilyeva's sake, then we would never have learned "xy from xy". And so how much is said. how much has been drunk!
  14. bsk_una
    bsk_una 18 January 2018 18: 32
    +2
    The court will show that these individuals acted correctly, taking into account the situation, and they will also give Heroia to Taburetkin. Now Medvedev and his clan are whitewashing the entire Medvedev clique with every fiber in the fact that it was only through "efforts" of Taburetkin that the Russian army became so powerful and developed. This is such a "feint" on the part of the authorities, allegedly leading foreigners into error - Susanin in modern times, however. What do those in power do not come up with in order to whitewash their actions of embezzlers !!!
  15. earloop
    earloop 18 January 2018 20: 04
    0
    ... He is suspected of involvement in the theft (ineffective spending) of 100 million rubles ...
    On the "little things", which are a fig in the submarine, such an official "person" can collect such garbage. Petrovsky prophylaxis must be carried out! To publicly chop a hand on the block, taking a bribe. And with a dirty broom drive behind the factory checkpoint, which brought a bribe to the people who took the "face".
  16. Petrol cutter
    Petrol cutter 18 January 2018 20: 26
    +2
    Wait, wait, brother! Inefficient use and steal are two big differences (as they say in one southern city). So don't jump to conclusions. As a shipbuilder-shipbuilder, I will report to you, almost everything is being built inefficiently in our country. A lot of ineffective, but simply stupid decisions are made daily, then canceled. And this is all money, however.
    1. earloop
      earloop 19 January 2018 23: 09
      0
      I agree that "ineffective and steal" are two big differences! But "inefficiency" is often a screen for theft. Yes, there is a lot of "inefficiency"! But if you formalize "inefficiency" in the prescribed manner with good justification, then the "sailors will have no questions"! But there are cases by mutual conspiracy of a deliberately planned "inefficiency", which will be heroically eliminated, but a "thread" can be allowed in the justification, for which, if you pull ", you can pull out 100 million rubles! and old approaches to design, there can be a huge number of all kinds of “collisions.” When using modern technologies in design, these “collisions” practically do not arise.
  17. tank66
    tank66 18 January 2018 20: 57
    0
    The greedyugi are to blame. They don't want to share the secret part of the budget with everyone. The first infa that came across from Yandex;
    "... The closed part of the budget as a share in total expenditures has been growing every year since 2009 (then it was 10%), follows from the data of the RANEPA and the Gaidar Institute. Based on the project of the Ministry of Finance, secret appropriations in 2016 will amount to 4,4% of Russia's GDP ...
    "The war in Syria, the appetites of the military-industrial complex and special services, the Rosgvardia that appeared this year," Zatsepin lists, commenting on the growth of the closed unit. In addition, a rearmament program until 2020 is in effect, the expert recalls. "
  18. The comment was deleted.