In the West, discussing the possibility of recognizing the Crimea part of the Russian Federation

49
The Western community is discussing a scenario about removing the Crimean topic from the political agenda and recognizing Crimea as part of Russia, reports RIA News Statement by the Deputy Prime Minister of the Crimean Government - Permanent Representative of the Republic under the President of the Russian Federation Georgy Muradov.

In the West, discussing the possibility of recognizing the Crimea part of the Russian Federation




More moderate circles are already discussing a scenario about removing the Crimean topic from the political agenda and recognizing Crimea as Russian, if Kiev at some point accepts this. I think that we should work on this option,
Says Muradov in an interview with the agency.

According to him, the main thing is “not to waste time and not allow a complete“ re-stamping ”of public consciousness in Ukraine, to seek Ukrainians to understand that Crimea and Donbass indicate a path to restoration historical community between the two countries and unity, which opens up the prospect of joint development. "

At the same time, the Deputy Prime Minister stressed that no special “international recognition” is required for the Crimea, which is not an independent state.

Here we are talking about something else: are our rivals ready to take active actions against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Russia, which included the Crimea? Obviously, this is the way no one puts the question, except perhaps for the Kiev nationalists. The Crimean theme, in my estimation, our opponents consider in a different plane,
he noted.

In particular, according to Muradov, judging by the documents and statements of Western politicians, "Russia is imposing a long play" according to the so-called Baltic scenario, supplemented by the economic (sanction) and military-political strangulation of the country. "

I believe that this is a scenario of consistent struggle against our country by non-military methods, according to the scenario of the collapse of the USSR,
He stressed.

The vice-premier also noted that Russia's nuclear shield and military might scare opponents of Russia, as well as “the awareness of the threat to the Russian people, its passionary character, will and determination to protect their future and the multinational civilization created over the centuries.”

Therefore, the West increasingly understands that aggression against our state will lead it to global conflict and suicide,
added on.
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    10 January 2018 13: 02
    In the west of Crimea? smile
    There will be no problem of Crimea — there will be any other so that the West (USA) can justify its endless struggle with Russia and all Russians.
    1. +7
      10 January 2018 13: 05
      Yankees will not allow to recognize Crimea as Russian
      1. +11
        10 January 2018 13: 19
        And if they do? Is it cold or hot for us? I’m living in Siberia myself, and it doesn’t bother me at all, whether the Americans recognize Siberia as Russian or not, the main thing is for Russia to recognize)

        And we are only to blame for what they want to eat.
        1. 0
          10 January 2018 13: 48
          Oh! The words of George Muradov and God in the ears! However, the USA is a satanic country and does not listen to God and its "apologists", lives solely by its personal interests.
      2. +4
        10 January 2018 13: 22
        Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
        Yankees will not allow to recognize Crimea as Russian

        Yes poker. To us, Russians, before the lantern, the calling of the West. They were always scum and went with war to us.
        This is what you need to remember and teach children that people living west of our borders cannot be trusted, under any circumstances. Thieves, liars, scum, murderers live there.
        It does not require recognition by the murderer of the Criminal Code to put him in jail, or better on count.
      3. +2
        10 January 2018 13: 26
        Quote: Aristarkh Ludwigovich
        Yankees will not allow to recognize Crimea as Russian

        and Crimeans on a deep drum, recognize them striped, or not
      4. +2
        10 January 2018 14: 08
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        Yankees will not allow to recognize Crimea as Russian

        How to know? Mattresses probably want to make this topic a bargain, in view of their keen desire to tear off a piece of territory in northern Syria, to which they want to give independence from Damascus. Here they can play according to the “bash on bash” scheme, understanding the fact that Crimea is ours anyway.
      5. 0
        10 January 2018 14: 54
        Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
        Yankees will not allow to recognize Crimea as Russian


        This is de until they default. Then a completely different picture will be.
    2. +2
      10 January 2018 13: 06
      So they themselves created a precedent with Kosovo, so to hell with them, flawed
    3. 0
      10 January 2018 13: 09
      The Russian Crimea for the West is like a red rag for a bull, a peculiar target and reason for attacks on Russia. So the recognition of the Russian Crimea is unlikely in the near future.
    4. +2
      10 January 2018 13: 12
      Some common words in the article. Who is discussing the opportunity? When and where were the statements? The political rank of these people (if they are not fictional characters)?
      And by and large - it’s deeply violet who recognizes there or not. The question of Crimea is closed. This is Russia.
      1. +2
        10 January 2018 14: 30
        I completely agree with you. I read the quotes from the article twice, as if talking about nothing, but there was a burning desire to know by name who exactly these "more moderate circles" are, and most importantly, what is their status, and also what is their moderation on the "moderation" scale. As a resident of the north, far from the Crimea, I want to know if our authorities did everything to make life easier for Crimeans who were caught in the blockade. And they are dear to me, because they remained loyal to Russia when, like the whole world, including the “brothers” of Belarusians, it turned on us
        1. +1
          10 January 2018 15: 01
          How did Belarusians gang up on you? Make it clear.
          1. +1
            10 January 2018 16: 31
            The authorities are russophobic. This year I was planning to come to rest in Belarus, because I still have not been there, and I have had sympathy for Belarusians all my life. My question is, have they all changed their shoes against the Russians? If that's all - is it worth the ride?
    5. +9
      10 January 2018 13: 19
      Crimea is Russia and that says it all, there would be no Crimea, there would be something else for which they would impose sanctions. Yes
    6. +2
      10 January 2018 13: 28
      Quote: Thrall
      The West (USA) could justify its endless struggle with Russia and all Russians.

      You yourself will be Russian blood? If you are so sad for Russia, then restore order in the west of Belarus! There Russophobes no less than in the United States will be. And we will deal with Crimea ourselves!
    7. 0
      10 January 2018 14: 35
      The price of the question is MAIN.
      FIRST WITH COXLES; BECAUSE WITH MOSCOWS, FOR THE NEEDED INTERPRETATION OF HISTORY.
      and "we will be clamped" I said before the election of trump in
      November 16 - Asia presses the Western world and it is necessary to compensate for the losses due to the weak-RF
  2. +3
    10 January 2018 13: 08
    You might think Crimeans will ride for joy if someone out there finally recognizes their legal status.
    1. +2
      10 January 2018 13: 26
      There is one plus, Sberbank will open its branches in Crimea ... smile And so Gref can’t, they’ll scare him with sanctions
      1. +4
        10 January 2018 13: 29
        There is a Genbank and RNKB in the Crimea; in 2014, it itself helped them set up the network and equipment. As far as I know, this is enough.
  3. +5
    10 January 2018 13: 09
    Russians somehow sneeze at the fact that they recognize Crimea as Russian or do not recognize. We know perfectly that Crimea is OUR !!! And this is quite enough for us.
    1. +1
      10 January 2018 13: 14
      The recognition of Crimea as Russian, and the referendum as legitimate, automatically put sanctions outside the law. The lifting of sanctions will finally allow Crimeans to live at least as the rest of the Russians live. Now the inhabitants of Crimea are pressured by the whole west for their choice, if you want they will take a puff for “Our Crimea”.
      1. +2
        10 January 2018 13: 22
        Old tradition, but hard to believe. How long did the Jackson-Venik mattress amendment work? And then Magnitsky’s law appeared. This will go on infinity.
      2. +1
        10 January 2018 13: 29
        Quote: MoJloT
        The recognition of Crimea as Russian, and the referendum as legitimate, automatically put sanctions outside the law.

        Are you really so naive or pretending to be? the same Magnitsky law had nothing to do with Crimea. and you can also come up with a million laws for the sanctions and the reasons for their introduction. for example, the lack of homosexuals in the leadership of power structures. what is not a reason?
        Quote: MoJloT
        Now the inhabitants of Crimea are pressured by the whole west for their choice, if you want they will take a puff for “Our Crimea”

        what do they mean? and all the other Russians are not "puffing"? or sanctions affected only those living in Crimea, and not Russia? or maybe it is not Crimeans voted to return to their homeland? there is no need to divide it into "they are the sufferers" and "the rest live happily ever after" - the sanctions affected the country and its entire population.
        1. 0
          10 January 2018 13: 33
          It is clear that the sanctions will not be lifted, because the Crimea will not be recognized ...
          or sanctions affected only those living in Crimea

          In fact, to the extent that Crimeans, this did not affect anyone else. (no need for mold cheese)
          Fortunately, not to bend, not to whine, but to fight to the last, in my opinion, the Crimeans already have it at the genetic level.
          1. 0
            10 January 2018 13: 37
            Quote: MoJloT
            In fact, to the extent that Crimeans, this did not affect anyone else. (no need for mold cheese)

            let's get some examples. about the inability to go to the USA / Europe is not necessary, there are a bunch of other revenge is no worse.
            1. +1
              10 January 2018 13: 45
              You are not at all in the subject, any businessman, company, corporation, state ... who works in Crimea will be subject to sanctions, in other words, they will wrap them up and put them in prison for a long time. Everything has to be delivered there semi-legally from Russia. (remember at least the notorious turbines, you can’t go to Crimea to Russia, but this even applies to a toaster, a nail or a tomato) There are no such restrictions on the rest of Russia!
              1. 0
                10 January 2018 13: 51
                Quote: MoJloT
                You are not at all in the subject, any businessman, company, corporation, state ... who works in Crimea will be subject to sanctions, in other words, they will wrap them up and put them in prison for a long time.

                here is a good example. those. in fact, in Crimea more than in the rest of Russia, the business working with European / American business suffers. not ordinary people. this of course has its effect, but there are 2 points:
                1. Russia is pouring huge funds into the peninsula to compensate for this.
                2. If Crimea had not returned, the situation (looking at Ukraine) would have been worse at times.
                1. 0
                  10 January 2018 13: 56
                  Business is not people?) God forbid, does the child need to get the imported medicine, or an electric generator that would not sit at a splinter? (it’s good to reason as long as you don’t live there, right?)
                  And I completely agree with 1 and 2, but this does not change anything. And I'm afraid for a very long time Russia will not be able to change something. You asked what is the difference between the Crimean and the mainland Russian, I answered you.
  4. 0
    10 January 2018 13: 22
    We ourselves raise this question, that somewhere somewhere "does not recognize" the Crimean Peninsula as part of Russia. Let us, for example, not recognize that Celesia belongs to Poland, and Alsace and Lorraine to France. Where is historical justice in these matters?
    Why is the question of annulling Khrushchev’s orders to “transfer Crimea” to the administrative subordination of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic still not raised in the Federal Assembly? There is no longer the Ukrainian SSR and never will be, the acts of Khrushchev were condemned by his accomplices almost immediately, and the legal documents live and continue, sorry, to crap.
  5. +3
    10 January 2018 13: 25
    When Soviet soldiers liberated the Crimea in 1944, they did not care about Hitler’s recognition, so why should we now care about the opinion of Fashington? request
  6. +1
    10 January 2018 13: 26
    and the recognition of Crimea as Russian, if Kiev would do so at some point

    If Bendera’s judges begin to be judged in Kiev, the United States will definitely pass Russia's sanctions to Ukraine.
  7. +3
    10 January 2018 13: 46
    The main thing is that we Crimeans consider ourselves Russians both legally and factually. And us army laughing
  8. +3
    10 January 2018 13: 52
    Somehow on the side ...
  9. HAM
    +1
    10 January 2018 13: 53
    However much they would have to worry about recognizing Texas or Alaska, I would like their concerns to be closer to them.
  10. 0
    10 January 2018 14: 08
    This is like our Bulk / Makarevich ... everywhere there are 2%
  11. 0
    10 January 2018 14: 33
    It is necessary to raise documents (if any) for the sale of Alaska smile If the Crimea for the Yankees is a subject of bargaining, then we can also bargain in Alaska, there certainly is not everything going smoothly with its sale ....
  12. 0
    10 January 2018 14: 56
    What is the "Baltic scenario"? Do not understand.
  13. 0
    10 January 2018 16: 05
    Quote: Crowe
    Quote: Thrall
    The West (USA) could justify its endless struggle with Russia and all Russians.

    You yourself will be Russian blood? If you are so sad for Russia, then restore order in the west of Belarus! There Russophobes no less than in the United States will be. And we will deal with Crimea ourselves!


    And whose blood will you be? Something of a black-yellow hue is visible. And what order do we propose to bring ... Banderlog? I myself do not see Russophobes with anything that is western Belarus, tell me, if you know. And what to understand in Crimea - it’s Russian forever. And the Hero City of Sevastopol does not have to be a NATO base! And Russophobes you, apparently, from the "Charter" and other "svoyadnymi" sites. So we do not respect them. The dog barks ....
  14. 0
    10 January 2018 17: 57
    In the West, discussing the possibility of recognizing the Crimea part of the Russian Federation
    I would like to know these heroes by name, as well as the position they occupy in their country, in order to assess their capabilities. Please post a list in the following articles. We will track them. Pliz
  15. 0
    10 January 2018 18: 27
    how does he know that? The EU does not give a damn about the Crimea problem, for the USA - it is relevant due to the lost opportunities. There will be no Crimea - there will be another
  16. 0
    10 January 2018 18: 56
    And Us Us !!! The only thing I want to say is ...
  17. 0
    10 January 2018 19: 08
    This is such an argument for the West, this cannot happen!
    If the West has a desire to circumvent its own sanctions, it will be quiet and under the pretext of expanding trust, but we will not forget Crimea.
  18. +2
    10 January 2018 21: 17
    They are discussing, not discussing ... the country will be STRONG, then there will be no problem of Crimea!
    And if someone remains, then it will be THEIR problem!
  19. 0
    10 January 2018 23: 04
    According to him, the main thing is “not to waste time and prevent complete publicizing in public consciousness in Ukraine, to seek understanding by Ukrainians that Crimea and Donbass point the way to the restoration of historical commonality between the two countries and unity, which opens up the prospect of common development” .

    I wonder how? After all, the overclocked machine of demonizing Ukrainians separately and by the whole country in the Russian Federation led to the fact that even in VO one day can not do without the "fascists" and "junta". This is without taking into account the demonization of the Russian Federation in Ukraine. Partners work actively on both sides.
    Personally, I care about Crimea and 1/3 of the Donbass. Despite the fact that for me personally the Russian people are not an enemy, but the authorities in the Russian Federation are openly hostile. And the policy of nurturing hatred among the partners is the same. What dialogue can be done with the same escalation of hatred? Territorial disputes? Well, these are the two most stubborn people (or one people) ...
    Yes, and some commentators always remind you that they are ready to throw at us all the Caliber (even those that have not yet been made) and the OTRK and all that is .. and then "free" from the bloody junta and from the best choice of the Ukrainian people (here you need to choose)
    How can you re-stamp the public opinion of Ukraine ??? If the talk show only demonization of Ukraine? In each topic, the demonization of the country's image ... As a result, we became a steeper enemy than the United States, although the demonization of the West began even during the Soviet Union ...
    The Russian Federation cannot influence the public opinion of Ukraine right now. On the contrary, she brings down images of the Info of War on the remaining listeners. And when she could influence, she did nothing. But no, she made money ..
    Therefore, the recipe here is simple - start to influence ourselves, ordinary Russians ... to make life better, to propose an idea. You look there will be what can be offered for dialogue. But not the shock of a nuclear club and Krymnash ... With Ukraine, this is a complete failure .. Crimea and Donbass is an apple of discord over which any dialogue will end in blood, now or later.
    According to the article, every year, for half a year, an article appears - West de, is ready to recognize Crimea as Russian .. Even Belarus does not recognize it as Russian. And the West every year extends the ridiculous Crimean sanctions, and all of these Turkey and China repeat the ter. integrity of Ukraine. The Russian Federation itself also declares this, as well as all the agreements between Ukraine and the Russian Federation in force, and there the Crimea is part of Ukraine .. yes that there is an agreement. Russian business also does not recognize Crimea as a full-fledged part of the Russian Federation. Specific and risky.
    1. 0
      11 January 2018 12: 41
      Demonization machine? According to my feelings, just our agitprop is not opposed to the conditional "ordinary Ukrainian." But the Ukrainian media just sin like that. Slaves, glass and so on.
  20. 0
    11 January 2018 00: 21
    And what does "West" mean? If we are talking about the EU, then these words can not be taken seriously.
    For the EU-sl.yushka America. What America says, the EU does.
    Listening to all sorts of politicians and party members is generally not worth it.
    For them, a trip to the Crimea is like hunting.
    Tickle nerves and raise ratings.
  21. 0
    11 January 2018 12: 51
    They don’t recognize anything. They just don't need it. No need to fly in the clouds and wait for something that definitely will not.
  22. +1
    11 January 2018 13: 00
    Quote: toha124
    Demonization machine? According to my feelings, just our agitprop is not opposed to the conditional "ordinary Ukrainian." But the Ukrainian media just sin like that. Slaves, glass and so on.

    Enough of you! Us state our channels day and night only heard about "what Ukrainians have." Yesterday, the presenter of the news, already with aspiration and undisguised joy, said that "in Ukraine, fat has risen in price by as much as 67%!" And this fat is not the same "ordinary Ukrainians" eat? And in general, what do we care about the prices of their fat and other crap in the Russian Federation? So no, from every faucet you can only hear "Oh, how bad it is!" We look straight better and better every day.