Military Review

Ukrainian strategy of Russia

68
A common place was the assertion that Russia does not have a coherent strategy for Ukraine. You can say, of course, that the “lack of strategy” is also a kind of strategy, but Russia has a “Ukrainian” strategy. Only this strategy is not simple and clear, of an offensive nature, which seems to be the only correct one.




The main strategic task of Moscow is, obviously, the “containment policy” of the United States and NATO, mirroring the American “containment policy” of Russia. The Ukrainian direction is an auxiliary one in relation to this main task: the “containment” by Russia of the United States and NATO, in diplomatic language.

What is Bandera Ukraine, established on the remains of post-Soviet Ukraine? it история about how for 5 billion dollars invested, according to the deputy. US Secretary of State Victoria Nuland, in the "Ukrainian democracy", you can mislead the people by bribing a part of its elite. And where is this "democracy"?

The Bandera regime that emerged led by Poroshenko’s “cynical Bandera” (these are his own words) is historically hostile to Russia and, moreover, is a puppet under “external control” of the United States, therefore it acts in the interests of the United States and not in its own interests, and thereby destroys itself! Russia cannot prevent this and therefore is waiting for this process to come to its logical conclusion that it is in Russia's interests: no one needs hostile alien puppets on its borders.

In 2018, Kiev needs to pay the order of 30 billion dollars to the IMF and other foreign lenders. The regime has no such money, and there is no place to take it. There are two visible exits: either a default with the subsequent sale of land, or the resumption of the war in the Donbas, which, as we know, can write off everything. Washington brought Kiev to this fork, and now pushes the military scenario with supplies of Javelins, Senator John McCain rubs his hands in anticipation of the resumption of war. Poroshenko officially announced the strengthening of the military group in the Donbas.

Russia avoids direct confrontation with Bandera, because Washington stands behind it. It is important for Russia to show how the USA and Europe use this replica for their own selfish purposes in order to teach their allies a lesson and those who are liberalizing in their own country: do not go to Europe for a walk! In fact, Russia uses the Bandera Ukraine as a bad example, discards Europe, as a warning to the whole world, as a “hot potato”: euro-associated — so be responsible for those whom I tamed, seduced, and robbed.

To hide the consequences of the Euro-Association, whose standards have been operating in the country for two years, Europe is raising a campaign about terrible corruption that has hit the Poroshenko regime. Poroshenko has corruption, she has always been in Ukraine - she is in Europe too! - it was under President Yanukovych, and its dimensions are about the same, but with the corruption of Yanukovych the country somehow developed, and today it is falling apart! The point here is not corruption, but a completely different conservatory.

The corruption of the “Poroshenko regime” is deliberately blown up by Europe to hide the consequences of the Euro-Association of Ukraine, which is destroying the “non-standard” industrial base of the country with its standards, as many economists and Russia independent of Europe and the United States warned about Maidan. Even Yanukovych realized this and asked for a European Union postponement for half a year, for which the USA and Europe gave him Euromaidan! And the "cookies" for this ride.

Europe’s accusations of “Poroshenko’s regime” of corruption are identical to those of the “Yanukovych regime” corruption - this is a mild scenario of the demolition of Petro Poroshenko’s power, somewhere analogous to the demolition of Yanukovych, with Peter’s residency moving to, say, Spain. But all the sins of the Euro-association he must take upon himself, a corrupt official, and be silent, like a fish about ice. Otherwise, some fighters against the “corruption of the regime” will be killed, as Boris Berezovsky was killed in London. Another solution to this issue is the scenario with the Javelins from Senator John McCain, who will write everything down, maybe together with Poroshenko. Like a fire in a warehouse where theft was found.

Europe advocates a "soft" option, so loudly screaming about the corruption of the "Poroshenko regime". The United States is promoting a "tough" military option, so they shout less about corruption in Ukraine, and lean on the "preservation of the territorial integrity" of Bandera. With the new war in Ukraine, the USA is also disrupting the construction of the Nord Stream - 2 and taking control of the power industry of Germany and Europe with its liquefied gas supplies. Germany does not want a war in Europe, nor to switch to expensive liquefied gas, even if it is American. The “Norman story” of 2014 of the year repeats: Atlantic unity is again under threat. Russia is interested in stabilizing the “hot potato” Poroshenko so that it can burn its hands to the western “colleagues” for a long time, restraining their expansion. Hence, this strange "vague" position of Russia in Ukraine.

In today's Ukrainian disposition, the position of Poroshenko’s “cynical Bandera” is least clear, does he really count on anything? His endless maneuvers are already irritating Western sponsors, they are already saying this to him openly, accusing them of corruption, refusing new loans, finally sending Mikhail Saakashvili, a stateless man to Kiev, but a “color revolutionary” with the idea of ​​“removing Poroshenko’s pusher”.

Another strange character on the Kiev scene is politician Viktor Medvedchuk, Putin’s godfather and Poroshenko’s special envoy for humanitarian affairs, who organized the New Year prisoners ’exchange in the Donbas. He publicly criticizes American special representative Kurt Walker. “Interfering with its arguments in the settlement in Ukraine”, criticizes official Kiev for not wanting to talk directly with the republics of Donbass, and at the same time, the SBU has no complaints about it. The Avakov Nazi "Azov" tried to attack the office of Medvedchuk in Kiev, but without success ...
Author:
Photos used:
http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/56378/photos/51749
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Mar.Tirah
    Mar.Tirah 9 January 2018 13: 22
    +9
    The war in the Donbass, according to the militias, is smoothly moving into the First Chechen Treaty. And everyone is already starting to get bored with it. Wait for the weather by the sea, and the war is going to be cold, here’s the Kremlin’s policy! Some lines with the front line; The conflict has a starting point, present and incomprehensible tomorrow . Writing heads in the ATO are hoping for Putin to leave the Kremlin to storm the cities of Donbass, and then distribute humanitarian aid to survivors, and will be banned for comments. “The crisis in Ukraine will objectively expand, regional elites in Kharkov and in other regions will get out of Poroshenko’s control so as not to completely go bankrupt,” the Kiev-Communist is involved in political science. He is the only one here who does not smoke. For some reason, I remembered how, on the first day, we, drunk, listened to the songs of Civil Defense, and how in the morning I was surprised at schoolgirls on a dilapidated street a step away from the gray zone. In the evening they shot. Https: //vk.com/strelkov_info? W = wall-5742
    4472_171979%2F7e40bd32aa4c2ff0a0
    1. Victor Kamenev
      9 January 2018 14: 07
      20
      It is clear that from the trenches, from the front line, the war is seen differently, and anger takes ... However, the command knows better, Putin keeps his word: Donbass does not crush, and will not. Why do not we attack? - This is another question, an offensive without clear political goals is only blood and destruction ... They say that courage is just patience. By the way, George Soros agrees that there will be a “wasteland” from Bandera.
      1. Chichikov
        Chichikov 9 January 2018 16: 01
        +5
        Well said! And in general, you publish good articles, and in sole authorship!
        There are others who, imitating the famous works of Ilf and Petrov, work on a short article together.
        1. Antares
          Antares 10 January 2018 11: 33
          +1
          Quote: Chichikov
          Ilfa and Petrova

          no need to compare classics with monotonous propaganda.
          Ilf and Petrov have been relevant for decades, and how many are these articles relevant?
      2. Lelek
        Lelek 9 January 2018 16: 36
        +5
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        Putin keeps his word: he will not let Donbass crush, and he will not.

        hi
        By the way, here is the opinion of the General of the Ukrainian Army Kikhtenko about V.V. Putin:
      3. Plate
        Plate 10 January 2018 16: 59
        0
        But here we must take into account that any army sitting without action begins to gradually decompose. Though teachings, marches are needed, as for me, to air the heads.
      4. Galaktionych
        Galaktionych 11 January 2018 21: 01
        +1
        Putin keeps his word? Well, if you mean his promises given to "Ukrainian partners", then yes, he does. And it helps with money, and fuel, and spare parts for military equipment.
    2. Jacob Agranov
      Jacob Agranov 13 January 2018 09: 51
      0
      All that this war brought was the enmity of Russia and Ukraine, the suffering and devastation of the locals. Well, the rating of our politicians. Is the game worth the candle?
  2. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 9 January 2018 13: 26
    13
    I point blank do not see any smart policies. Our Okhlamons admitted to this. Continue to condone. And they are not doing anything in order to rectify the situation in the right direction. Speak resist the west? How? Having gotten up on four mosls and turned your ass to the "partner"?
    1. Victor Kamenev
      9 January 2018 14: 10
      17
      These are your problems that you do not see. Others see, the same Volker, that Russia does not make any concessions. The “partners” say that it was Putin who put them in Syria on four levels. The time will come and Ukraine.
      1. Antianglosax
        Antianglosax 9 January 2018 16: 26
        10
        An interesting twist - complete failure, large-scale political, economic and image failure on the outskirts now pass as a strategy? Laughter, and nothing more. As for Syria, I don’t know what the Anglo-Zionists once again lie about four oils, but in fact 30% of Syrian territory, moreover, oil-bearing territory of the Americans! And they are not only not going to get out of there, but clearly show that they are there seriously and for a long time! And they spat on Putin and his chatter as many times as needed, exposing him to the full in front of the whole World.
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 9 January 2018 19: 43
          +5
          Quote: Antianglosaks
          complete bankruptcy, large-scale political, economic and image failure on the outskirts now pass as a strategy

          Judging by the state of Ukraine, the failure is not ours.
          Quote: Antianglosaks
          And they are not only not going to get out of there, but clearly show that they are there seriously and for a long time

          So let's see how much.
      2. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 10 January 2018 10: 20
        +2
        The article is competent. You have an assumption when all this will move off the ground ... after all, such a peace / war in the Donbass cannot last for a long time ....
      3. Galaktionych
        Galaktionych 11 January 2018 21: 08
        +1
        Walker is the head! And this one, how is he? ... Ah, Michael Bohm, an American "journalist" on payroll at Channel One.

        Of course, Russia does not make any concessions, if by concessions we mean the surrender of positions as a result of the struggle for these very positions. The Kremlin’s actions are rather a chaotic surrender of everything and everything in the desire to earn the forgiveness of a strict American uncle.

        That is, not Machiavellianism, but Smerdyakovism.
    2. Victor N
      Victor N 9 January 2018 14: 21
      +1
      Where is the channel? How to end the war? And the annoyance is clear.
    3. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 9 January 2018 17: 03
      +5
      pack a backpack and drive the road to Donetsk as a volunteer ... realize your “smart policy” there ... otherwise it’s easy to criticize from the sofa
  3. Nemesis
    Nemesis 9 January 2018 13: 51
    10
    The Kremlin’s strategy in Ukraine has failed completely, it’s frankly criminal and anti-Russian ... 1) The Kremlin didn’t return the huge money allocated to Ukraine and, apparently, it willn’t return ... 2) The Kremlin’s refusal to send troops to the Donbass led to punitive operations against the Russian population in the Donbass by Bandera. 3) The Minsk agreements led only to the fact that the Bandera gangs used this time to train personnel and equip their units with new military equipment, all the while continuing the shelling of Donbass ...
    1. Victor Kamenev
      9 January 2018 14: 16
      16
      However, one to one theses of the State Department, except punitive. The British journalist in 60 says the same thing: Russia lost Ukraine ... Enemies cannot be lost, by the way, the returning prisoners say that all punitive people speak Russian, you rarely hear them ... So who are these Bandera, and where did they come from in such quantities?
      1. Nemesis
        Nemesis 9 January 2018 16: 06
        10
        Refusing to send troops to the Donbass in 2014, Russia did not lose enemies, but friends and killed a bunch of its own citizens, who, unlike the Kremlin, had a conscience and went to war at their own peril and risk, without returning from the battle ... Where did Bandera come from ask the Communist Party and the EP ... Some re-educated them for 70 years and accepted them into the ranks of their communist party (for example, Irina Farion is a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, purebred Bandera, who, according to her, was brought up on Bandera songs) and Putin, who fed orders and loans for 20 years Bandera Ukraine fought against the Russian Federation in Chechnya and Ossetia ...
      2. Antares
        Antares 10 January 2018 11: 38
        +3
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        Russia has lost Ukraine.

        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        It’s impossible to lose enemies

        one way to convince yourself of the loss of something is to assure yourself that it was not needed, interfered, and hostile.
        2 to make the largest Russian-speaking state an enemy with the largest land border in Europe ... brilliant ...
      3. Galaktionych
        Galaktionych 11 January 2018 21: 13
        0
        A thoughtful remark. And let's bomb Voronezh? There, after all, everyone speaks Russian.
    2. Seraphimamur
      Seraphimamur 11 January 2018 08: 00
      +4
      Donbass in Ukraine is another country, even if Russians live there, but now Russians also live in the USA.
      Why should I take a gun and go sort out squabbles to another country. To whom it is bad there you can move to Russia by changing citizenship. And Putin is right in doing that he does not hang such a collar in the form of Ukraine on the neck of Russia.
      1. Galaktionych
        Galaktionych 11 January 2018 21: 10
        0
        That’s all right!
        Nobody promised anything to Donbass, and the lazy Donetsk Ukrainians themselves are to blame.

        By the way, was something promised to Crimea? I’m not mentioning it already, the memory of the old man became ...
      2. Nemesis
        Nemesis 14 January 2018 09: 02
        0
        Because at one time, your ancestors did not take the machine gun and did not ask the Moscow courtiers - On what basis do they give the land of Russia to some Ukrainians and Kazakhstan ..?! And it’s time for Putin to resign, as well as for all other lovers of the Yeltsin’s swamp, around which Putin is marking time ...
  4. axxenm
    axxenm 9 January 2018 14: 17
    +6
    Compradors and ethnic mafia are in power
    there is a common main strategy - to divide and confuse Russians
    - so that you can continue to rob and take out the loot ..
    As part of this overall strategy, they have a private strategy for Ukraine.
    - cram Russian Ukraine into a hostile media, economic and military space.
    And to distract the simple-minded patriots or cynics who dress under them
    - "successes" in sacred Syria,
    this is not some kind of unnecessary kerim, dudaev (groundhog), usman and other kobzons "Kievan Rus"
    1. Victor Kamenev
      9 January 2018 14: 42
      13
      What about "sacred Syria" ... Do you want Ukraine to become like Syria, smoking with blood and fires? What a “nekomprador”, I forgot that Russia was almost shoved to where Ukraine is today, and it was Putin who pulled her out of there. We did not give up Ukraine - then we sat in the pit ourselves, and pulled ourselves out by the hair, it was not up to Ukraine to save ourselves.
      As for the scenarios: “Syrian” and “Georgian” scenarios in Ukraine are viewed. Russia is being forced to do these scenarios, but they are not satisfied with Moscow, it thinks about the third one in some way.
      1. axxenm
        axxenm 9 January 2018 14: 54
        +5
        Quote: Victor Kamenev
        As for "sacred Syria" ... Do you want Ukraine to become like Syria, smoking with blood and conflagration?

        Crimea didn’t ..
        And in the Donbass, where the frightened Russian Spring compradors launched "cunning plans" and other Dudaev simulacra, children are still dying ...
        So your argument hits your "guardian" position ..
        1. Dart2027
          Dart2027 9 January 2018 19: 45
          +4
          Quote: axxenm
          Crimea did not.

          From the very beginning, there were many of our troops in Crimea, and there were almost no Bandera troops, and its size is much smaller.
          1. axxenm
            axxenm 9 January 2018 20: 06
            +5
            the usual excuses on the part of the propagandist elite should already be ashamed to repeat ...
            forgot more - "if **** defended Russian Ukraine, World War III would have started !!!"
            1. axxenm
              axxenm 9 January 2018 20: 19
              +6
              1400 days have passed since the coup in Ukraine. As long as the entire Great Patriotic War lasted. During this time, the USSR suffered two catastrophic defeats in the summer of 41 and 42, but managed to overcome their consequences and defeat the strongest military power in the world. Without any multi-paths and cunning plans. And no one even thought had to utter the phrase: “themselves, all by ourselves”, “why should we feed Ukraine” and the like nonsense.
              1. Kent0001
                Kent0001 10 January 2018 00: 51
                +6
                Do not distort.
              2. Seraphimamur
                Seraphimamur 11 January 2018 08: 04
                +1
                Ukraine was part of a country called the USSR. And now it is a separate, independent state. which has nothing to do with the Russian Federation.
              3. trut3078
                trut3078 11 January 2018 20: 38
                0
                At the cost of what loss of life, dear, recall? Do you want to repeat? Balabol sofa.





































                7
            2. Dart2027
              Dart2027 9 January 2018 20: 49
              +9
              Quote: axxenm
              the usual excuses on the part of the propagandist elite should already be ashamed to repeat ...

              That is, there is nothing to argue?
              Quote: axxenm
              "if **** defended Russian of Ukraine, World War III would have begun !!

              No, just the Russian Federation would have received several million parasites on the neck.
              Quote: axxenm
              During this time, the USSR suffered two catastrophic defeats in the summer of 41 and 42, but managed to overcome their consequences and defeat the strongest military power in the world. Without any mnogohodovok and cunning plans

              And how did it end? Cream was collected by the Americans. Want a repeat?
              1. ando_bor
                ando_bor 9 January 2018 22: 01
                +9
                Quote: Dart2027
                No, just the Russian Federation would have received several million parasites on the neck.

                Moreover, evil parasites-sure that the occupiers are obliged to contain them.
              2. zoolu350
                zoolu350 14 January 2018 20: 55
                0
                Quote: Dart2027
                Quote: axxenm
                During this time, the USSR suffered two catastrophic defeats in the summer of 41 and 42, but managed to overcome their consequences and defeat the strongest military power in the world. Without any mnogohodovok and cunning plans

                And how did it end? Cream was collected by the Americans. Want a repeat?
                Become the second superpower of the world, have a zone of influence in Europe and centers of influence in the rest of the world. I want such a repetition.
                1. Dart2027
                  Dart2027 14 January 2018 21: 19
                  +1
                  Quote: zoolu350
                  I want such a repetition.

                  At the cost of 27 million dead, not counting material losses? Thank you, it’s better with multi-paths - slower, without grand victories, but cheaper.
                  1. zoolu350
                    zoolu350 15 January 2018 06: 46
                    0
                    With multi-paths, we get the opposite result. The owners of the Fed overcame Ukraine, now they aimed at Kazakhstan, and then the turn of the Russian Federation.
                    1. Dart2027
                      Dart2027 15 January 2018 19: 08
                      +1
                      Quote: zoolu350
                      With multi-paths, we get the opposite result. Fed owners squeezed Ukraine

                      The Ukraine project was originally intended to split the Russian people, and it was just a multi-pass.
                      1. zoolu350
                        zoolu350 15 January 2018 19: 13
                        0
                        That is, to surrender Ukraine to the owners of the Fed - this is a multi-step oligarchy of the Russian Federation. Ingenious! Soon it’s obvious that they will surrender the Kuril Islands of Japan in the same way.
      2. antivirus
        antivirus 9 January 2018 17: 34
        +3
        not the outskirts, but the Republic of Belarus and the interests of the Russian Federation in the Baltic - the main losers. they are behind NATO.
        only the growth of trade with east and south will change the dependence on exports through the Cher and Baltic Seas.
        time is against us, and against all who break the geography of eastern Europe.
        we don’t break "partners" here - we must tear ourselves.
        it is advisable to relocate another 3-5 million from the outskirts to Siberia and the East
        more than one GDP in a stalemate
  5. bankirchik34
    bankirchik34 9 January 2018 15: 21
    +8
    Any conflict can be used in both directions. And the Russian Federation also uses this permanent conflict to solve geopolitical problems. Let people perish and cripple destinies, but we did not begin this.
    A forceful solution to this situation from the Russian Federation is exactly the option that has long been calculated by the "partners" and for which a training manual has been prepared (that is, one of the obvious ways), and therefore not suitable for the Russian Federation.
  6. vasya.pupkin
    vasya.pupkin 9 January 2018 16: 30
    +5
    Quote: Victor Kamenev
    It is clear that from the trenches, from the front line, the war is seen differently, and anger takes ... However, the command knows better, Putin keeps his word: Donbass does not crush, and will not. Why do not we attack? - This is another question, an offensive without clear political goals is only blood and destruction ... They say that courage is just patience. By the way, George Soros agrees that there will be a “wasteland” from Bandera.

    I basically agree with you / V.V.P. will not let me crush ... /, but it reminds me of too stingy, which does not kill the cat immediately, but cuts off the tail in parts. Four years they’re killing us “in parts,” and V. Surkov, who looks at the Donbass, can’t even give us digital communications. I'm already silent about Javelins.
    1. Non liberoid Russian
      Non liberoid Russian 9 January 2018 17: 09
      +4
      Javelins?))))) and that they have already been sold by ukram? give digital connection? here it is the essence - if only you were given ... buy
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. vasya.pupkin
        vasya.pupkin 10 January 2018 11: 41
        +7
        Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
        Javelins?))))) and that they have already been sold by ukram? give digital connection? here it is the essence - if only you were given ... buy

        Here it is the essence of the liberals: “buy”! La and they will sell their mother, if only someone bought it. Yes, they don’t give a damn about such simple and smelling concepts as MOTHERLAND, Patriotism, etc. And the concept of “Russian World” acts on them like a demon in a church. And I’m not silent about the Javelins in vain. This is “ju-ju-ju juan” ...
  7. Captain Nemo
    Captain Nemo 9 January 2018 20: 27
    +2
    I did not understand, and who robbed the Patriarchal sacristy in 18?
  8. shinobi
    shinobi 9 January 2018 20: 57
    +8
    There is no intelligible policy here, and it won’t. It is necessary to talk and decide with the Yankees, but they don’t keep their word and do not fulfill the agreement. In any case, figures like McCain are sitting in the Senate. So there’s a way out only on the military plane, which politicians didn’t broadcast there. And for a full-fledged confrontation of forces we still have not enough. We can hit, hit very hard, but that’s all. And then we need full-fledged acupation. Not with our economic problems.
    1. dSK
      dSK 10 January 2018 01: 10
      +3
      Hello Yuri!
      Quote: shinobi
      with our economic problems
      History repeats itself, but of course, not one to one. In the 41-45 against the Nazis in the West were "allies", now in NATO, almost all of Europe, the States and Japan controlled. China is our ally in the Far East, the problems are common, but in Europe it is against NATO, it will never subscribe to an alliance with us. After Hiroshima, the strategy of world wars changed - instead of short-term in 3-4 years - "creeping aggression". Small countries are swallowed whole, large states are crushed. The states are not interested in preserving a united Ukraine, they are well aware that they cannot drag all of it into NATO. There will be a division of spheres of influence and Russia needs to have time to accumulate more strength before this. hi
  9. Sergeant71
    Sergeant71 9 January 2018 23: 55
    +5
    I didn’t even finish reading, I already knew the author wassat The same standard phrases, faith in the holy "multi-way" and the fact that our supreme power cannot lie by definition. Although it was our e ..... th policy for decades that led to what we have. Closing our eyes to the active outlandering of the country and feeding the wolf, which we couldn’t just crap on our heads.
    The first channel and the 60-minute program with talking dummies called "experts" is resting laughing
  10. myobius59
    myobius59 10 January 2018 11: 17
    0
    Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
    Javelins?))))) and that they have already been sold by ukram? give digital connection? here it is the essence - if only you were given ... buy

    And they are buying. And ammunition, and weapons and ammunition. I recently met a friend. He fought there. Medal "For the defense of Horlivka". So first hand.
    There is no Kremlin strategy there. Everything is simpler. , as in a joke about a hunter and a bear. Do you remember? “Mikola, I caught a bear.” - “So drag him here!” - “So he doesn’t let me in !!!”
    Something like that. The GDP probably has a head spinning around this bums. No one there knows what to do. They are waiting for what may, as in another joke, - everything will resolve itself.
  11. Antares
    Antares 10 January 2018 11: 49
    +6
    Only in the reserve near Kamenev can one read about Bandera, the bloody and illegal junta, that it will freeze, fall apart, that Poroshenko in Spain, 3 Maidan, Trump is good (and God bless him with his America) is bad, and the German boyars are against and for Putin, that the Russian Federation won, they all lost, and now the Victory is close and apple trees will bloom on Mars.
    Kremlin strategy for Ukraine? Yes, it was not there, as in relation to the whole of Russia. Something like “again these minor problems” that interfere with pipeline dreams and rocking from the bowels.
    Situationally tails. The Kremlin does not have a decent policy for the Russian Federation, and Ukraine is far somewhere ..
    Having lost the floor of Europe, we say enemies and no need, losing the Baltic States, no need, they are all enemies, having lost BE - yes they always were enemies, having lost Ukraine - they were enemies too ... I’m afraid from the genius of such a policy it’s possible to bomb Voronezh - the enemies will also be, parasites sat on the neck ...
    You know, for America it is such a Russian Federation that is good. He doesn’t ask for a drink, he regularly makes money. It depicts the Soviet shadow of danger over democracy and a small counterbalance to China, works as a supplier of resources and does not pretend to much ... And everything else is just a performance.
    An article typical of Masons ... nothing new, stamps, propaganda # Soon ...
  12. andrew xnumx
    andrew xnumx 10 January 2018 22: 27
    +2
    Awesome article. It was difficult to come to the conclusion that Europe was fanning the corruption scandal in order to hide the consequences of the euro association. Just unbelieveble. A terrible example of Ukraine should be a terrible example for all of us, for all of Russia, for all who know how and want to think.
    1. Uxus
      Uxus 11 January 2018 13: 02
      0
      how scary to live ... we all die ???!
  13. Atilla
    Atilla 11 January 2018 01: 44
    +3
    What is the Kremlin’s policy? Is it voiced or registered somewhere? Along the way, it is to pump out everything that Russia can and dump on time our rulers in the same decaying west. You don’t have to go far for examples, thanks to Gorbachev.
    1. Galaktionych
      Galaktionych 11 January 2018 20: 59
      +1
      Kremlin policy is a "cunning plan" for the Russians and "what are you willing to do?" for expensive "partners".
  14. Third kalach
    Third kalach 11 January 2018 10: 51
    0
    Cognitively, McCain was buried on the lawn last year ...
  15. Uxus
    Uxus 11 January 2018 13: 00
    0
    Quote: Lelek
    Quote: Victor Kamenev
    Putin keeps his word: he will not let Donbass crush, and he will not.

    hi
    By the way, here is the opinion of the General of the Ukrainian Army Kikhtenko about V.V. Putin:

    Retired. Why not to pat the pensioner with his tongue for denyuzhku:
    "Dismissed to the reserve from military service with the right to wear military uniforms by decree of the President of Ukraine of October 11, 2010."
    Also a raider:
    "On May 12, Petro Poroshenko signed a reprimand for Donetsk governor Alexander Kikhtenko and Transcarpathian - Vasily Gubal for violating the deadlines for erecting defensive structures. [6] On June 5, the Cabinet of Ministers introduced the president to dismiss the chairman of the Donetsk Regional State Administration Alexander Kikhtenko due to improper performance of official duties [7].

    He was relieved of his post by the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko on June 11, 2015 [8]. "

    What can he answer?
    Stay on the line, your opinion is very important for us ...
  16. Galaktionych
    Galaktionych 11 January 2018 21: 16
    +1
    Quote: Nemesis
    Where did Bandera come from? Ask Putin, who fed orders and loans to Bandera Ukraine, who fought against Russia in Chechnya and Ossetia, for 20 years ...


    Well, why fed? Why cheat then? He didn’t feed, but continues to feed, water, shoe and act as a guarantor of the security of the Kiev junta.
  17. Bypassed
    Bypassed 13 January 2018 15: 50
    0
    I’m embarrassed to ask - is the ever-growing Avenue of Angels a part of this strategy?
  18. turbris
    turbris 13 January 2018 19: 24
    0
    Quote: Nemesis
    Refusing to send troops to the Donbass in 2014, Russia did not lose enemies, but friends and killed a bunch of its own citizens, who, unlike the Kremlin, had a conscience and went to war at their own peril and risk, without returning from the battle ...

    Well, and you personally, why didn’t you end up in the Donbass in 2014, since you are so cool? Or is it much easier to pretend to be a hero from the couch, were you not in this heap of your own citizens who went to war at your own peril and risk?
  19. turbris
    turbris 13 January 2018 19: 32
    0
    Quote: Uxus
    Stay on the line, your opinion is very important for us ...

    I'd like to clarify for whom someone's opinion is important to you? Can you tell me how many young people left Donbass and are not going to defend their homeland by providing this function to volunteers, including from Russia?
  20. turbris
    turbris 13 January 2018 20: 22
    +1
    Of course, the article has some assessment of Russia's policy towards Ukraine, but there are many questions that are not answered in the article. But bloggers came off in their comments, it’s just interesting to read - from frankly stupid to claims to originality. In order to understand the policy of Russia, one must return at that time, and not now, to be clever for any reason. Everything was clear with Crimea, there was full support of the population for the only purpose - unification with Russia. And in the Donbass there was no such support, whatever they said. And instead of uniting in order to protect their home, a significant part of the population simply left the war zone, some to Ukraine, some to Russia and if not for volunteers, then everything ended the same way as in Kharkov or Odessa. In many cities of Russia, you can still meet migrants from the Donbass who are not going to protect anyone and are just waiting for someone to stop fighting there, mostly young people of military age. Well, and how in such circumstances it was possible to introduce the Russian Armed Forces to the Donbass, for some in the Donbass they would become "invaders" and I do not exclude shots in the back. Of course, now in the Donbass, I hope a different situation, there are people who are ready to defend their home to the end and they need help. But to fight directly with Ukraine is exactly what the USA is seeking and what the West is afraid of. I’m writing this specially for very “zealous” bloggers, therefore the article correctly says that the policy pursued by Russia towards Ukraine is balanced, responsible and the only right one.
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 17 January 2018 08: 29
      0
      Quote: turbris
      Well, and how in such circumstances it was possible to introduce the Russian Armed Forces to the Donbass, for some in the Donbass they would become "invaders" and I do not exclude shots in the back. Of course, now in the Donbass, I hope a different situation, there are people who are ready to defend their home to the end and they need help. But to fight directly with Ukraine is exactly what the USA is seeking and what the West is afraid of. I’m writing this specially for very “zealous” bloggers, therefore the article correctly says that the policy pursued by Russia towards Ukraine is balanced, responsible and the only right one.

      The policy pursued by the oligarchy of the Russian Federation in relation to Ukraine before the Maidan and to Ukraine after the Maidan is wretched and defeatist. The basis of the whole question is: "What is Ukraine?" Based on the logic of the oligarchy of the Russian Federation and adherents of the KhPP, this is another state where strangers live. Based on the logic of the Imperials, Ukraine is a part of Russia, treacherously torn from it as a result of the Bialowieza conspiracy, falling under the control of the lackeys of the owners of the Fed, banderlogs (Russians with altered consciousness), and the methods by which the owners of the Fed cut off part of Russia, work perfectly and in the opposite direction (to reunite).
  21. Dart2027
    Dart2027 15 January 2018 19: 30
    0
    Quote: zoolu350
    That is, to surrender Ukraine to the owners of the Fed - this is a multi-step oligarchy of the Russian Federation.
    Actually, this project was conceived by the Austrians, which has long been known to everyone, and implemented by the Communists under the pressure of Lenin, which is also known to all.
    1. zoolu350
      zoolu350 17 January 2018 08: 14
      0
      Quote: Dart2027
      Actually, this project was conceived by the Austrians, which has long been known to everyone, and implemented by the Communists under the pressure of Lenin, which is also known to all.

      Let's say that the Ukraine project was conceived by the Austrians. They were the first and tried to implement it together with the Germans in 1918-1920, but Lenin had his own project and not only Ukraine, but also Germany and France and Italy, etc., and he severely broke the Germans with the Austrians. Then the Communists so successfully implemented the Ukraine project that in the early 90s of the 20th century, Kiev was a completely RUSSIAN city, this is personal information from their own eyes. So there is no need to attribute the inaction and connivance of neovlasovs from the oligarchy of the Russian Federation to the owners of the Fed and their slaves banderlogs to others.
      1. Dart2027
        Dart2027 17 January 2018 19: 36
        0
        Quote: zoolu350
        but Lenin had his own project, and not only of Ukraine, but also of Germany and France and Italy, etc., and he severely broke off the Germans with the Austrians
        Well, and how was his project realized in Germany, France, Italy, etc.? Maybe it’s broken off?
        Quote: zoolu350
        Then the Communists so successfully implemented the Ukraine project that in the early 90s of the 20th century, Kiev was a completely RUSSIAN city,
        And is it that until 1917 he was already a Russian city?
        1. zoolu350
          zoolu350 18 January 2018 07: 47
          0
          Quote: Dart2027
          Well, and how was his project realized in Germany, France, Italy, etc.? Maybe it’s broken off?
          And is it that until 1917 he was already a Russian city?

          In part, Lenin died in 1924. and the country was just beginning to move away from the GW, but the GDR was created in 1949.
          That is, in 1917, Kiev is a Russian city, in 1992. Kiev is a Russian city, and some time after the start of power, the oligarchy of the Russian Federation and Bandera are no longer Russian. TA DAM!
          1. Dart2027
            Dart2027 18 January 2018 19: 41
            0
            Quote: zoolu350
            That is, in 1917, Kiev is a Russian city, in 1992. Kiev Russian city

            That is, in 1917 from the Russian city, and after the creation of Ukraine Ukrainian. Thanks to Lenin. But the oligarchy of the Russian Federation has nothing to do with it.
            Quote: zoolu350
            astically, Lenin died in 1924. and the country was just beginning to move away from the GW, but the GDR was created in 1949.

            That is, Lenin did not succeed. And the creation of the GDR is the result of victory in the war.