Military Review

Russia will take into account the deployment of missile defense system in Japan with its military planning

50
Russia will take into account in its military planning the deployment of land-based missile defense systems (PRO) in Japan, said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov.


He noted that Moscow paid attention to the statement by the Japanese Foreign Ministry, which claims that the anti-missile system deployed in this country will be controlled from Tokyo and does not pose a threat to Russia and other neighboring countries.

Russia will take into account the deployment of missile defense system in Japan with its military planning


Everyone, however, is well aware that Japan has long been drawn into the creation of the Asian segment of the global US missile defense system. Back in 2006, the US-Japan intergovernmental agreement on cooperation in the field of missile defense was signed. In accordance with it, joint development of the newest generation of interceptors is under way. That is, the complexes technically and functionally deployed on Japanese territory are identical to the American ones.
- the words Ryabkov are quoted in the message on the website of the Russian Foreign Ministry.

The fact that similar complexes may now appear on the eastern borders of Russia also creates a new situation for us, which we, of course, cannot but take into account in our military planning. We once again urge our Japanese colleagues to weigh whether it is in their interest to become complicit in the violation of the INF Treaty (Medium and Shorter Missile Treaty)
- noted the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation.

According to Ryabkov, the antimissiles that will be used in complexes in Japan are identical to those capable of launching both interceptor missiles and attack cruise missiles of medium and smaller radius of action.

The US places them at its military bases in Romania and Poland, that is, near our western border, contrary to the INF Treaty of 1987, prohibiting the appearance of such installations on land
- noted the deputy minister.

The Japanese government 19 December decided to deploy in the north and southwest of the main island of the country Honshu tentatively in 2023 two American missile defense systems Aegis Ashore, which, according to Tokyo, should protect the country from ballistic and possibly cruise missiles. These plants will be purchased in the USA and will cost approximately 100 billion yen (about $ 889 million) each.
Photos used:
TASS / Sergey Fadeichev
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Pirogov
    Pirogov 30 December 2017 13: 42
    0
    They turn to the Japanese like they decide something ?!
    1. Rusland
      Rusland 30 December 2017 13: 50
      11
      We turn to the rising sun, and there dawn, do not dawn.
    2. katana
      katana 30 December 2017 13: 53
      +2
      Quote: Pirogov
      They turn to the Japanese like they decide something ?!

      Pirogov - what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor who shoots rockets through the territory of Japan and laughs in a bad tone all the time? Would you take into account the wishes (or threats - depending on how you consider) of Deputy Minister Ryabkov and not deploy the missile defense system at or would you have been "sent" by an entire deputy foreign minister of the Russian Federation and deployed missile defense data on your territory?
      1. Non liberoid Russian
        Non liberoid Russian 30 December 2017 13: 56
        13
        but do not provoke this neighbor ...
        1. katana
          katana 30 December 2017 14: 05
          +1
          Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
          but do not provoke this neighbor ...

          "Do not provoke" is how?
          1. Non liberoid Russian
            Non liberoid Russian 30 December 2017 14: 09
            +1
            Լեռնային Ղարաբաղում ադրբեջանցիների հալածման ձեւը
            1. katana
              katana 30 December 2017 14: 24
              +2
              Quote: Not a liberoid Russian
              Լեռնային Ղարաբաղում ադրբեջանցիների հալածման ձեւը

              Wow - I look - you know Armenian too! fellow My respect and respect to you. And in Nagorno-Karabakh no one particularly persecuted the Azerbaijanis, there was a war and everything turned out as it is at the moment. There was a war, not provocations, as you wrote a comment above.
          2. rice
            rice 30 December 2017 15: 08
            +3
            Quote: katana
            "Do not provoke" is how?

            Remove Amerov bases from their territory.
            1. Hoc vince
              Hoc vince 30 December 2017 15: 51
              +4
              Question Kuril even theoretical died forever.
              1. Hoc vince
                Hoc vince 30 December 2017 15: 56
                +3
                Place new defensive complexes in the Kuril Islands, and under this pretext stop any dialogue with samurai
      2. Monos
        Monos 30 December 2017 14: 07
        17
        Quote: katana
        and what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor,

        Remind us, when was the last time North Korea (and, in general, Korea) attacked someone? What about Japan? smile
        1. katana
          katana 30 December 2017 14: 27
          +2
          Quote: Monos
          Quote: katana
          and what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor,

          Remind us, when was the last time North Korea (and, in general, Korea) attacked someone? What about Japan? smile

          And here attacked or not attacked. The leadership of the DPRK almost officially every day declares that it will erase a number of states from the face of the Earth, including Japan. request
          1. Monos
            Monos 30 December 2017 14: 38
            12
            Quote: katana
            and among them Japan.

            Your speculation. Eun only the United States shows "Kuz'kin mother." smile
            Quote: katana
            And then attacked or not attacked.

            Despite the fact that they did not attack (unlike Japan) and are not going to attack. And your interpretation of the DPRK statements is cunning and odious. I don’t know if you consciously do this or out of ignorance. All their statements come down to one thing: if there is aggression against us, then we will respond sternly and adequately. That's all. Study the question and do not be the devil's advocate.
      3. Pirogov
        Pirogov 30 December 2017 14: 21
        +7
        Quote: katana
        Pirogov - what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor who shoots rockets through the territory of Japan and laughs in a bad tone all the time? Would you take into account the wishes (or threats - depending on how you consider) of Deputy Minister Ryabkov and not deploy the missile defense system at or would you have been "sent" by an entire deputy foreign minister of the Russian Federation and deployed missile defense data on your territory?

        For more than 50 years of history, the DPRK has not bombed anyone or climbed to teach life! Or about the inadequate neighbor did you mean the United States?
        1. katana
          katana 30 December 2017 14: 39
          +1
          See my comment above - it is, that is, the DPRK officially declares that it will erase the same Japan. And shoots through its territory into the sea - the ocean. In addition, I do not want to start srach here, but the grandfather of the present started the war in Korea in 1950 Kim the Third Great. Even in Armenia we have the expression “Korean orphans!” It seems that the fat man forgot what war brings with him, and not only him!
          1. Pirogov
            Pirogov 30 December 2017 14: 47
            +2
            Quote: katana
            See my comment above - it is, that is, the DPRK officially declares that it will erase Japan as a powder.

            And you specify for yourself, after which such statements and actions of the DPRK went?
        2. Scalpel
          Scalpel 31 December 2017 12: 31
          0
          It bombed South Korea - that's enough.
      4. MOSKVITYANIN
        MOSKVITYANIN 30 December 2017 15: 53
        +2
        Quote: katana
        Pirogov - what would you do in place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor who shoots rockets through the territory of Japan and laughs all the time in a bad tone?

        I would think that this is revenge for Japan’s centennial occupation of ALL Korea .... about the Korean genocide by the Japanese you can google yourself or do you think that the working people of the Republic of Korea love the Japs more than their counterparts from the North ...?
      5. Sands Careers General
        Sands Careers General 30 December 2017 16: 06
        +8
        Do not pull the tiger with a mustache
        If there is no confidence in forces.

        US missile defense systems in Japan will not help if the DPRK is driven to despair by its sanctions and provocations. In this case, millions will die, and the United States will joyfully rub their hands, counting the profits.
        1. Scalpel
          Scalpel 31 December 2017 12: 32
          0
          Those. Kim will sacrifice millions of Koreans to kill a million Japanese? However.
          1. MOSKVITYANIN
            MOSKVITYANIN 31 December 2017 12: 36
            +1
            Quote: Scalpel
            Those. Kim will sacrifice millions of Koreans to kill a million Japanese? However.

            Why are you surprised? He had good teachers, neither Stalin nor Mao spared any special people, i.e. natural losses ...
    3. iouris
      iouris 30 December 2017 14: 08
      +2
      They do not appeal, but conjure. Well, they probably believed in the possibility of victory in the "info war". Meanwhile, since 1962 there has been an effective method of pressure on the United States. There is no other.
      1. katana
        katana 30 December 2017 14: 28
        +1
        This is what method has been invented since 1962 - do not enlighten us?
        1. iouris
          iouris 30 December 2017 14: 31
          +1
          And you yourself are no longer able to "enlighten"? Googel to help you.
          1. katana
            katana 30 December 2017 14: 41
            +1
            Quote: iouris
            And you yourself are no longer able to "enlighten"? Googel to help you.

            Well, don’t languish like that - why should you cross out a few lines?
  2. Jackal
    Jackal 30 December 2017 13: 43
    +3
    North Korea will be equipped with everything necessary ..! And China, too .. Here then, and let's play gentlemen!
    And the Far East of Russia is equipped with a layered anti-aircraft defense!
    1. katana
      katana 30 December 2017 13: 56
      +1
      Quote: Jackal
      North Korea will be equipped with everything necessary ..! And China, too .. Here then, and let's play gentlemen!
      And the Far East of Russia is equipped with a layered anti-aircraft defense!

      China does not need "equipment." It will soon begin to squeeze your country out of the arms market. Russia and China produce weapons with similar tactical and technical data and the Chinese will primarily compete with you, not with the Americans.
  3. Rostislav
    Rostislav 30 December 2017 13: 45
    +3
    Once again, we urge our Japanese colleagues to consider whether it is in their interests to become accomplices in violation of the INF Treaty (the Treaty on intermediate and shorter-range missiles)

    Would prcm say, is it in their interests to become a target?
    1. katana
      katana 30 December 2017 13: 58
      +1
      Quote: Rostislav
      Once again, we urge our Japanese colleagues to consider whether it is in their interests to become accomplices in violation of the INF Treaty (the Treaty on intermediate and shorter-range missiles)

      Would prcm say, is it in their interests to become a target?

      They are already targets of Kim the Third Great’s nuclear missiles. You still haven’t noticed this, just like your Foreign Ministry.
    2. Scalpel
      Scalpel 31 December 2017 12: 35
      0
      What's the difference? They survived the Cold War at gunpoint and survive Kim.
  4. Tusv
    Tusv 30 December 2017 13: 55
    +3
    Guys from Japan. Pour the islands and rejoice. Well, if according to Kin dza dza, then the Muzzle and Tsak will go to the Cell, otherwise we will not hear you. And do not see you yellow pants. And for us, the Pvoshniks are a good target, but for Tactical batteries ... Wear a Tsak, it will be calmer, or join the Primorsky Territory
  5. chidoryan
    chidoryan 30 December 2017 13: 57
    0
    That is, in fact, our authorities are trying to ban Japan from defending themselves from crazy Kim?
    1. katana
      katana 30 December 2017 14: 08
      +3
      Quote: chidoryan
      That is, in fact, our authorities are trying to ban Japan from defending themselves from crazy Kim?

      The statement of the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation can be understood in such a way - no matter what Kim the Great is doing there - you, the Japanese, sit quietly under the “broom and do not rustle”! wassat bully
  6. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 30 December 2017 14: 04
    +2
    North Korea is actually to the west, southwest, why are they trying to "hang noodles" on their ears! The main thing is that we heard them, and we will take into account their desire to become a target in case of something.
  7. Old26
    Old26 30 December 2017 15: 17
    +4
    Quote: Monos
    Quote: katana
    and what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor,

    Remind us, when was the last time North Korea (and, in general, Korea) attacked someone? What about Japan? smile

    Killer argument. That is, if now between us and Iran there will be a sharp deterioration in relations (very, very radical supporters of Islam will come to power) and Iran begins to deploy an anti-missile defense system on its territory, will there be the same argument? "And when did Russia attack Iran?"
    The first assault rifles appeared in service a hundred years ago, jet planes appeared 70 years ago, and rocket weapons began to appear in many countries 50-60 years ago. Around the same time, nuclear
    As adherents of the idea that nuclear weapons are a panacea for losing sovereignty now unanimously say so, it can be said in exactly the same way that a small country that had never dreamed of destroying its evil neighbor, which spread rot during World War II, is now having nuclear weapons (and the neighbor is not) can do this. And the argument that she never attacked anyone would be just a fiction.
    There is such a good expression about this
    I DON'T NEED TO KNOW YOUR DESIRES, I AM ENOUGH TO KNOW YOUR OPPORTUNITIES.
    No need to know the Japanese whether North Korea has a desire to destroy Japan. It is enough for them to know that she has opportunities. Therefore, it is protected

    As for the statement of our Foreign Ministry, the last two statements - Zakharov and Ryabkin do not add weight to their statements. Chewing gum called universal launchers. About which in the contract there is not a word.
    Yes, they can launch a cruise missile instead of an anti-aircraft missile. But opportunities are not a proven fact of violation. The same Ukrainians planned and are planning their operational-tactical system in three guises at once. She will be able to launch operational-tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, anti-aircraft missiles. That is universal. Our launcher for the Iskander is also universal. It can carry both ballistic and cruise missiles. We even sometimes proudly trump that there can be missiles with a range of up to 2500 km. Is it a violation of the INF Treaty or not? The installation is universal. In the contract, as well as MK-41 is not registered? So is it a violation or not? Or maybe it will still be a violation when such missiles are placed there, but now this is not a violation? As with the MK-41
    And the phrase attributed to Ryabkin generally killed
    According to Ryabkov, anti-missiles to be used in complexes in Japan identical to those capable of launching both interceptor missiles and medium-range and shorter-range strike cruise missiles.
    Okay, about anti-missiles to be used in complexes in Japan, he made a reservation. Not missiles, but launchers, otherwise it will be a meaningless set of words
    Well, the phrase identical to those capable of launching both interceptor missiles and medium-range and shorter-range strike cruise missiles.Generally beyond comprehension. I ruined on my own to strengthen the degree of my statement and blurted out that from these launchers rockets of a smaller radius of action, and not just medium ones, are also launched? It is interesting to know what kind of missiles are these that are launched from the same installations? Really "Harpoons" or ASROK "??? Here so one blurt out from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and then Lavrov dissolve their amateur performances

    Quote: Jackal
    North Korea will be equipped with everything necessary ..! And China, too .. Here then, and let's play gentlemen!
    And the Far East of Russia is equipped with a layered anti-aircraft defense!

    Of course, how could it be otherwise. This is EUN !!!!! Let's give him a dozen three "Topolis." a couple of hundred nuclear warheads. But God forbid, after that, something to refuse him. "Poplars" will be in Moscow. Under its own power.
    Well, DV - it is of course protected by a layered missile defense. It is capable of shooting down all missiles with a flight range of no more than 3500 km. But large in range - alas, no. And it knocks down at a distance of half a hundred kilometers from the standing position of the launcher of this missile defense system. So what about the layered missile defense of the Far East, I would be silent.
    And having provided everything you need for China, are you ready, then, in response to the ultimatum of China, to part with territory, for example, at least to Baikal? Which the Chinese will ultimately demand to give to them (especially after we equip them all), Have you played enough with computer shooters, since you are proposing this?

    Quote: katana
    China does not need "equipment." It will soon begin to squeeze your country out of the arms market. Russia and China produce weapons with similar tactical and technical data and the Chinese will primarily compete with you, not with the Americans.

    You don’t even need to squeeze out a specialist. With their economic potential, it will simply overwhelm everyone with its weapons. And from the arms markets he is gradually squeezing. The same countries of Southeast Asia take even the worst fighter planes compared to ours, but which are cheaper than ours. Now China has a base already in Africa. It will take several years and Africa will be armed with Chinese weapons. We sometimes think for a decade whether to sell the export version of Iskander to the same Saudi Arabia, and the Chinese already seem to have staked out this section. They already plan to replace ballistic missiles like DF-3 in KSA with newer DF-31s. They will offer their missiles with a range of 300-600 km - the Saudis will take. Like the Chinese universal MLRS, capable of firing shells of various calibers and generally missiles with a range of 4 hundred kilometers. As time passes, they will gradually drive out Americans from the arms market of Saudi Arabia

    Quote: chidoryan
    That is, in fact, our authorities are trying to ban Japan from defending themselves from crazy Kim?

    In fact, yes, arguing that they help Americans break the INF Treaty

    Quote: katana
    The statement of the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation can be understood in such a way - no matter what Kim the Great is doing there - you, the Japanese, sit quietly under the “broom and do not rustle”!

    In fact, yes, it should be understood. And if God forbid, a mess begins with millions of victims and the use of nuclear weapons, ours will be able to declare, "why are you brothers, you could not unite in order to prevent Kim from destroying you"? crying
    1. katana
      katana 30 December 2017 18: 23
      +2
      Dear forum member under the nickname Old 26 - I, frankly, am shocked by your analysis. I did not meet such deep and smart analyzes. My respect to you.
  8. Ural resident
    Ural resident 30 December 2017 15: 29
    0
    North Korea and their Kim are certainly inadequate.
    But the United States cultivates these shoots of Kim, they are certainly not afraid - but it is beneficial for them to have a horror story at hand - to create a global missile defense system and an instant strike that will be against us and, possibly, China. This is of concern to them first of all and not to Eun. So the Japs pickle in this sauce
  9. krasin
    krasin 30 December 2017 15: 37
    0
    Well?? Let's master the Kuril Islands together!
    I think this is an argument to resolve the issue. B U D E M.
    WE WILL BE GOOD FOR JAPANESE. soldier
  10. Zomanus
    Zomanus 30 December 2017 15: 44
    0
    In short, the coordinates of Japanese objects will be loaded into some warheads.
    And you need to understand that all these missile defense systems are destroyed first of all by default.
    And only then comes the analysis of what they wanted and why we misunderstood them.
    But missile defense will already be destroyed.
    1. MOSKVITYANIN
      MOSKVITYANIN 30 December 2017 16: 33
      0
      Quote: Zomanus

      But missile defense will already be destroyed.

      Together with the Japanese about you?
  11. APASUS
    APASUS 30 December 2017 17: 09
    0
    Now you can safely connect the American missile defense system with the solution of the issue of islands and a peace treaty with Japan! I would have understood this idea if the system was purely Japanese, and since it is not even Japanese but the American missile defense region, there should be no talk of peace.
  12. Going
    Going 30 December 2017 17: 21
    +3
    Everyone, however, is well aware that Japan has long been drawn into the creation of the Asian segment of the US global missile defense system.


    To do this, the United States from and occupy.
  13. Hurricane70
    Hurricane70 30 December 2017 17: 38
    0
    Quote: katana
    Quote: Pirogov
    They turn to the Japanese like they decide something ?!

    Pirogov - what would you do in the place of the Japanese, having on the threshold of an inadequate neighbor who shoots rockets through the territory of Japan and laughs in a bad tone all the time? Would you take into account the wishes (or threats - depending on how you consider) of Deputy Minister Ryabkov and not deploy the missile defense system at or would you have been "sent" by an entire deputy foreign minister of the Russian Federation and deployed missile defense data on your territory?

    How did you deduce the inadequacy of Japan’s neighbor? It’s good to repeat mantra! Who's pushing this? Well, don’t you make yourself an incomprehensible individual ... And who "shoots rockets through the territory of Japan? This has already been discussed here! To what height does the rocket rise? Is a piece of space above Japan also their territory? And our satellite, when it flies over Japan violates its borders?
    1. Scalpel
      Scalpel 31 December 2017 12: 44
      0
      The problem is that Eun himself shows his inadequacy. Read his statements, read the North Korean press, everything will be clear.
  14. Nemesis
    Nemesis 30 December 2017 17: 44
    0
    It’s bad in the Russian Federation with the economy and with the planning and distribution of funds ... The shipbuilding program in the Russian Federation has been completely failed ...
  15. Old26
    Old26 30 December 2017 19: 46
    0
    Quote: katana
    Dear forum member under the nickname Old 26 - I, frankly, am shocked by your analysis. I did not meet such deep and smart analyzes. My respect to you.

    Thank. But skill and experience, as they say, do not drink.

    Okay, here's the thing. The speech of the deputy foreign minister is a bragging point to the Japanese. Moreover, the same Japanese understand that his speech about all the same universal launchers is a bunch in a puddle
    To do this, just see where these settings will be located. The first is in the north, in Akita Prefecture, the second generally in the Hiroshima area is Yamaguchi Prefecture.
    The simplest measurement in any map resource indicates that from the launch site in Akita Prefecture to Vladivostok - and this is the most significant goal - more than 800 km. From Yamaguchi Prefecture - to Vladik - more than 100 km. And if such missile bases in Romania and Poland, with the possible replacement of anti-ballistic missiles with winged ones, can still work out - whether we want it or not, but the Tomahawk guidance system is such that in addition to the inertial guidance system it has a number of subsystems, in particular, an electronic map correction. Because of this, they are accurate. In this case, it’s rather unwise to go 800 or 1000 km above the water, so that the ANN accumulates an error and displays HZ where the rocket is. But the deputy minister does not seem to care, such reasoning. He needs to stamp his foot. And the Japanese look at him and think to themselves. "Uncle, what are you? Not crazy?"
    1. Dalailama
      Dalailama 30 December 2017 19: 49
      0
      Quote: Old26
      "But the deputy minister doesn’t seem to care, such reasoning. He needs to stomp a leg. And the Japanese look at him and think to themselves. Uncle, are you? Not inside?"

      will go to the coast there and check.
    2. iouris
      iouris 31 December 2017 14: 23
      0
      Quote: Old26
      And the Japanese look at him and think to themselves. "Uncle, what are you? Not crazy?"

      And the Russians seem to have stopped thinking, or the Russian (RF) Leviathan is too many-headed. Perhaps this is a consequence of the multi-vector nature of the Kremlin’s foreign policy, or in the absence of ideology.
  16. Old26
    Old26 31 December 2017 11: 31
    0
    Quote: DalaiLama
    will go to the coast there and check.

    Yeah, if you do not take into account the size of the correction zone. And that’s all in them. A missile can fly banally past this correction zone, continuing to follow the ANN. No, somewhere she will fall, no doubt. But is it a goal?
  17. StVahmistr
    StVahmistr 31 December 2017 17: 10
    +2
    Quote: katana
    Well, don’t languish like that - why should you cross out a few lines?

    He probably means the Caribbean crisis.