The United States urged Russia to full cooperation in the framework of the "Open Sky"

21
Washington called on Moscow to "constructively cooperate" in resolving the situation around the Open Skies Treaty, reports RIA News statement by the representative of the State Department.



We urge Russia to cooperate constructively with us in resolving our concerns. The US’s response is reversible if Russia returns to meeting its obligations under the Open Skies Treaty,
said the diplomat to the agency.

He said that the United States, with 2004, allegedly commits Russia to violate the terms of the contract. In June of this year, Washington made claims because of restrictions on flights over the Kaliningrad region, a ban on flights along the 10-kilometer corridor on Russia's borders with South Ossetia and Abkhazia, as well as deviation from the agreed flight routes under the pretext of force majeure.

The representative of the State Department called the measures introduced earlier by Washington towards the Russian side as the abolition of "some flexibilities in good faith." At the same time, he did not comment on the restrictions on the contract by the Russian Federation, which had previously been announced in Moscow.

We will carefully consider any Russian measures as soon as they are announced and clarified,
noted the official.

The United States respects (the agreement) and will continue to fulfill its obligations under the Open Skies Treaty and remains ready to resolve issues related to its implementation,
He stressed.

Earlier, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova reported that Moscow considers the US allegations of violating the Open Skies Treaty to be unsubstantiated and forced to go for a number of reciprocal restrictions from January 1, as notified by Washington. According to her, the point is that “the Russian side stated in the advisory commission on the open sky about the intention to cancel the overnight stays on three airfields during flights with the participation of the United States”. In addition, from the New Year, it is planned to cancel a number of agreements with the American side, which concerned the facilitation of the flights under the contract.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    29 December 2017 08: 19
    We also call for full cooperation, and then what?
    1. +15
      29 December 2017 08: 22
      Quote: Teberii
      what's next?

      It is necessary to conduct overflights of American territories under an open skies agreement on long-range bombers! With full ammunition ...
      1. +5
        29 December 2017 09: 38
        Hello, hello I think the Dalniks can do such work on the shoulder. At the same time, and set goals wink
      2. +2
        29 December 2017 12: 36
        Then - by means of flying around with cruise missiles .... Why should we strain the Dalniks very much?
    2. +5
      29 December 2017 08: 26
      How did they? They gave us in the face, and offered not to give an answer, it would be worse. As soon as the impudent punks act, which is confident in their impunity. the more people pass, the more impudent they are.
      1. +3
        29 December 2017 09: 18
        Quote: Mar. Tira
        How did they? They gave us in the face, and offered not to give an answer, it would be worse. As soon as the impudent punks act, which is confident in their impunity. the more people pass, the more impudent they are.

        Learn, colleague, how to say politically correct: "Sorry! Obosratushki" winked
    3. +4
      29 December 2017 09: 14
      As soon as the mattress shook hands, they immediately started talking about cooperation. And there was nothing to limit Russia on the clauses of the agreement.
  2. +1
    29 December 2017 08: 20
    Again, the Americans are muddied ... they don’t get it ... then they don’t ...
    1. +7
      29 December 2017 08: 25
      And from their point of view, we muddle this. Therefore, we need not slowing down to tell that so there were violations, here and there, in so many things, from such a number. And do not play silence. In fact, for a simple Russian it is not clear who is wrong here. We say that they have broken something, they say that we are. No documentary evidence has been provided by either party.
      1. +2
        29 December 2017 09: 45
        Quote: klaus16
        No documentary evidence has been provided by either party.

        Claus sixteen, you question the decisions of our Foreign Ministry and talk about the legality of the claims of the mattresses.
        Confirmation of rottenness of mattresses needed? Please - destroyed by mattresses Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya.
        You need to drive them from Russia and the mattress pad there.
      2. +5
        29 December 2017 10: 07
        Who should I tell? Our majority for closing the sky, and it is useless to tell them, they have already said that we are to blame. If for cooperation, so let them take the first step, open closed areas, and we will talk, and so it turns out we always make excuses and make concessions to "partners"
  3. +2
    29 December 2017 08: 22
    The classic "what for sho?" laughing
  4. 0
    29 December 2017 08: 46
    Americans, in the last 30 years, are accustomed to "play with one goal." And when "otvetka arrives," they are sincerely perplexed, for which)))
    A sense of impunity can play a trick
  5. +5
    29 December 2017 08: 47
    Maybe enough already "fool" include!
    Full cooperation on mattress is when they do what they want, and the rest they lick?
    Wake up gentlemen, your time is running out, there is still the opportunity to save face, and not to rage from the excess of anger, biting everyone around.
    In your opinion it will never be!
  6. 0
    29 December 2017 08: 52
    Garbach and Yeltsin gave them “goodwill,” so much more.
  7. 0
    29 December 2017 09: 31
    We urge Russia to engage constructively with us in resolving our concerns.

    ... and they don’t go to the pot without "concern" ... bully
  8. BAI
    +3
    29 December 2017 09: 39
    US response is reversible if Russia reverts to meeting Open Skies obligations

    That is, we are canceling the restrictions that were imposed in response to the actions of the United States, and after that they will think about whether to allow flights over Hawaii and Alaska. Maybe it should be the other way around?
  9. +1
    29 December 2017 10: 02
    “Interact constructively”
    How can you interact, and even constructively with those who (the United States) are not actively striving for this. In words, one thing, in fact, another. Georgia whose vassal? So influence it, and do not breed demagoguery. And in general, you probably need to completely jump off this contract.
  10. +1
    29 December 2017 10: 13
    We urge Russia to engage constructively with us in resolving our concerns.

    What do we care about your concerns? belay
    In general, these “partners” are somehow strange, to say the least. They close their skies for us, limit them in every possible way, and when they receive an answer, they begin to lament. it seems that for them the best state of things is when they can fly over us where and when they want, and we don’t even have the right to approach their territory.
    Well, where does the dialogue smell here? belay fool
  11. 0
    29 December 2017 14: 13
    Quote: esaul
    Quote: Mar. Tira
    How did they? They gave us in the face, and offered not to give an answer, it would be worse. As soon as the impudent punks act, which is confident in their impunity. the more people pass, the more impudent they are.

    Learn, colleague, how to say politically correct: "Sorry! Obosratushki" winked

    I greet you friend! Finally it appeared, in so much time. I am glad to read you. Well, as I could. I wrote like that.
  12. 0
    31 December 2017 01: 39
    The response should be a little tougher, then the partner has a desire to either back down or to negotiate. Or continue to not break contracts.