Military Review

Parting words to the President of Russia-2018

127
It used to be such a practice that voters gave instructions to their candidates. Today this also exists, but in a slightly different scenario. Candidates promise voters common phrases (which they are often not going to do), and voters are trying to grab something for themselves. For home, courtyard, quarter, district.


Parting words to the President of Russia-2018


Since we are talking about the president of an entire country, we will talk about things of a different nature. More ambitious.

Of course, it is quite clear that the event, which is already called the “referendum of confidence in Putin,” will, as expected, end in Putin’s victory. There is no doubt about it.

The whole question is solely about how many people will come to the polls and how many will vote against Putin. That is, for Sobchak, Navalny (if allowed), Polonsky, Zhirinovsky and others. The exception, perhaps, is Grudinin, who enjoys the attention and a certain fame as a business executive, and in 2024, he will be able to qualify.

It is this number of voters who will be the determining factor in the 2024 year, when Putin will not be, but there will be some of his successors. The one whom Putin will lead himself to replace, as Yeltsin at one time led Putin. Well, as it was with Medvedev. Track rolled, the meaning of something to change?

But before 2024, there are still as many 6 years of government, and this is what I would like to wish.

Foreign policy.

Everything is more or less normal here, we are accustomed to the fact that our president constantly replays foreign leaders in the long run. It seems like a self-evident fact. But let's look around. Do we all beat? Have they all won?

As an example - the scandal around our diplomatic property in the United States. There were many angry speeches of our politicians. Statements of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. So what? Actually, nothing.

But in general - spitting in the face, comparable to the pre-Olympic show.

And the victory in Syria? No one in Russia doubts that Russia has made the main contribution to this victory. Sorry, but today, every European and American will tell you that Russia has cleverly tied to the victory over terrorism. Coalition fought long and almost won. And then the cunning Russian appeared. Appeared to steal the victory.

Although, we must pay tribute, we are well attached to this. Here and other people's video, and videos from a computer game ...

Work on the external front, of course, goes. Every day, in one or the other Russian media, one can read about the respect that is felt for the Russian president in different countries of the world. The whole world listens not even to the words, but to the breath. Authority indisputable.

Only in the next article you can always read about the extension of the sanctions or the adoption of new sanctions against Russia. The American president has no authority. From the word at all. Moreover, most politicians, at least in words, refer to this inadequate, respectively. However, nonetheless ...

Foreign political victories are more than strange: they give us sanctions and humiliations, we give them oil, gas, rocket engines and everything else.

For some reason, there is a desire for a really solid course and not bloated victories. Without lies. Hence the real respect for the country.

Domestic policy.

I would like to see a departure from the already annoying principle "the king is good - the boyars are bad." More and more we understand the principle that it is against the background of overtly worthless ministers and their leader that the president’s figure looks divine. And - not least - irreplaceable!

And I would like to replace the Minister of Sports, who is not thinking about sports, but about his new role in a Hollywood third-rate fighter. Minister of Education. Minister of Culture. Minister of Finance. Minister of Economic Development.

The entire economic bloc needs a thorough shake-up. Because, first of all, his actions are aimed at filling the pockets of oligarchs and selling the natural wealth of Russia.

Yes, it is no secret that Russia lives mainly due to the export of oil and gas. Here really, than rich. We sit on the needle, for her, my dear, we even fight.

But if there is not enough money for the development of domestic infrastructure, why does money earned on exports go to the West?

Not everyone understands or is pleased that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation regularly invests in American securities. And the figure is already weighty - 108,7 billion.

But not everyone knows that the Central Bank is investing not only in US bonds.

Most investments are made in France (26,3%). The second place is occupied by the United States of America (21,6%), the third - by the securities of domestic companies (14,1%), and the fourth - by Germany’s treasury bills (12,3%).

The state, represented by the relevant ministries and departments, trusts in terms of saving money the United States, France and Germany, rather than domestic companies. Fact. But I would like to completely different.

Actually, this is not surprising. We have a somewhat similar picture in comparison with the times of the USSR. But only a few.

All the same totalitarian power of one party. "United Russia". Oligarchs, with rare exceptions, are members of the EP. The ministers and their deputies and assistants are members of the EP. Governors and mayors of cities, with the rarest exception, are members of the EP. Deputies - again the EP.

And the whole system, in which it is still necessary to add absolutely corrupt courts, works exclusively for the benefit of the oligarchy. That is the system that Mr. Yeltsin built on the wreckage of the CPSU.

The latest example is the Yamal LNG project. Yes, plant, infrastructure, benefits to the enterprise. But the company was built by a private structure together with the Chinese and the French, and the first gas went to the UK. That is, if you do not go into details, what kind of country was the first client, then yes, victory. The owners of the plant, that is, the oligarchs Timchenko and Michelson.

The power in the country should not belong to a handful of oligarchs who earn money on what the country is rich with. Money earned on the sale of resources should go to the development of the country as a whole, and not go abroad.

It is necessary not to negotiate with the oligarchs, but to force them to return funds to the country. And use for the good of the country, not a group of individuals.

Ideology.

Everything is very strange here. The complete lack of such, it would seem, however, the humiliation of the Soviet past in full. And along with the statements of the president about how everything was terrible and sad in the Soviet Union, there is a glorification of other ideals.

Here you are the president who opens the Yeltsin Center and the wailing wall for political prisoners. Solzhenitsyn as the honor and conscience of the era, and so on.

The peak of the struggle is the State Prize of Alekseeva, who devoted her whole life to the struggle with Russia. Including on the money of foreign intelligence services, which was proven in court in 2006 year.

Here it is worth recalling the Constitution. Written off from the American, with all the consequences. It is still written under Yeltsin and signed by him. It is for the sake of the oligarchic system that we have today.

To sum up somewhat, we have what we have. The construction of the new state by Yeltsin, perhaps, has somewhat slowed down. And we did not reach the ideal that Yavlinsky and Sobchak associates are talking about. But they did not return to Soviet times.

Of course, there is no talk about any return under the present-day power. We are already talking not about the socialist state as a kind of goal, but about the social one. In the image and likeness of Germany, Sweden, Belgium, Finland.

We, in terms of wealth and resources, can well afford to build such a state. And it is even spelled out in the very Constitution. I would just like to remove the amendment: a welfare state for those who "got into the cage."

It is time. Already it makes sense to think about the timing.

Gorbachev experimented with 1985 for 1991 years. 6 years.

Yeltsin destroyed the Union and its system from 1991 to 1999 years. 9 years.

Putin has been in power since 2000. 18 years at the time of the election.

Yes, breaking is not building. Restore harder than destroy. But Putin himself admits that restoring the Soviet Union is nonsense. We do not insist.

But what remained of the USSR (culture, education, social sphere) - all this could and should have been not just left, but improved and multiplied.

And to create conditions when everyone, without exception, will give his due. Build a truly great country for all, not just for those in public office and the oligarchs who created their empires under Yeltsin.

March 2018 of the year will show the level of trust in Putin. Two figures: turnout and the number of voters against him. Of course, the so-called administrative resource can wind at least 89%, but ...

And there will be another 6 years in order to really mark the further course of the country. Either a truly great country for a great people, or a great pasture for oligarchs who will shear their sheep and rams.

If you correct the current rate, it will be quite good, as it seems to us. Glory to circumstances, it’s not necessary to break and rebuild today. It is only necessary to improve, since the deadline is the last, and one should not look back at either the "partners" or anyone else.

We think that “there” they understand that in 2024, the administrative resource may not be enough.

We are waiting for March ...

Afterword. Sure, every reader has something to add from himself.
Author:
127 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. 210ox
    210ox 27 December 2017 06: 23 New
    +9
    What I want to wish ... Yes, that there would be a military man in power ... Well, you understand. And about to adjust the course ... Yes, just for that matter. Stop busting.
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 27 December 2017 07: 07 New
      10
      One wish, but impossible, anti-corruption
      1. jolly deckhand
        jolly deckhand 27 December 2017 07: 23 New
        +8
        One or more domestic problems of their own state to deal with, rather than foreign policy, since your prime minister and the ministers are not taken out, do it yourself.
        1. Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
          Aristarkh Lyudvigovich 27 December 2017 07: 59 New
          12
          Quote: jolly deckhand
          One or more domestic problems of their own state to deal with, rather than foreign policy, since your prime minister and the ministers are not taken out, do it yourself.

          That is, it is necessary to deal with internal issues. I already know more about Syria than about Russia. Apparently there are no more problems in Russia. A little positive from the Bashkirs in the morning.
          1. dSK
            dSK 27 December 2017 08: 15 New
            +4
            Quote: Aristarkh Lyudvigovich
            A little positive in the morning.


            Happy holiday Rescuers!
            1. dSK
              dSK 27 December 2017 08: 33 New
              +1

              We wish the Rescuers of Russia fewer "emergencies" in the New Year!
        2. Sling cutter
          Sling cutter 27 December 2017 08: 43 New
          11
          Here are the wishes, I could not say better!
        3. 34 region
          34 region 27 December 2017 11: 27 New
          16
          jolly deckhand, 07:23. What do you do yourself? To do something, you need to sit down and think. To make a plan. So Stalin thought and made plans. Putin constantly flickers on the screen. When should he think and make a plan? Well, would take a week a month, sat down, thought. He has all the work for the public. There are more shows than work. It feels like the gray cardinal is thinking for him, and Putin is only following his commands.
        4. White and fluffy
          White and fluffy 28 December 2017 14: 41 New
          +2
          On the contrary, Putin thanks the government for making the possible and impossible for the country !!!
      2. Mazandaran
        Mazandaran 28 December 2017 14: 55 New
        +1
        Corruption cannot be defeated, but it can be reduced, which is now being done!
    2. 34 region
      34 region 27 December 2017 11: 18 New
      17
      210quq, 06:23. Duc Putin seems to be an officer !? Or were there no officers in the KGB? The military can seize power or help with the seizure. The participation of the military in the murder of the husband of Catherine the Second or the abdication of Nicholas II took place with the participation of the military. The October Revolution was carried out with the participation of the Russian General Staff. But a man like Stalin should lead the country. And neither a military man, nor a business executive, nor a scientist, nor an artist, nor a priest, but! Very talented organizer and very smart person! Beria also did not study at the Sorbonne and Yale. But these people were able to organize and create! Today, people with higher education rule us! AND?! Education they received. And what could they organize? Or did they study in a sabotage school? HSE School is. So there is a higher sabotage school !? But the military has a lot to learn. This is a strategy. Putin does not have it. Without a strategic plan, the economy cannot be boosted. Many soldiers cannot win on their own initiative even in one battle. And no matter what it is, military or economic. hi
      1. askme
        askme 27 December 2017 12: 05 New
        +6
        Many soldiers cannot win on their own initiative even in one battle. And no matter what it is, military or economic. hi

        Economics and war are completely different. The problem of those who perceive the economy as an arena for hostilities is that they do not understand one simple thing: you can force a soldier to go into battle, you can. But you cannot force a cow to give birth and you cannot force a cow to give a lot of milk. It turns out that if you yell at a cow, beat it, blow it over with a fume and so on. miasma - a cow gives half to three times less milk, even if you feed it properly. This is an analogy for the economy and for normal life in general ...

        Putin is good because he understands this moment well. Maybe because he has daughters ... That is, this is a mature man - he does not yell at the weak, does not pull in the life of the country that which itself has not matured, has not recovered. But he sincerely tries to create conditions for a normal life in the country. That in his power.

        Once again: a cow cannot be made to milk with kicks - only with affection and care. And Russia needs a president who understands this. For a long time just such is needed. Because for the last hundred years, too much cruelty, filth, and other bestiality has taken root in ordinary life, in customs, back from the Soviet cowsheds ... This whole ugly tendency needs to be completely reversed. From sadism and masochism, from the psychology of kicks, from the psychology of total war in peacetime, go to a normal economy, to human relations and to cows, including, not to mention women and people in general.

        Now, when this transition occurs, the time will come for another President, not Putin. In the meantime, the country needs a warrior, a real man-warrior who is raised by his parents in the unconditional respect of Mother, Woman and further: the Economy, the Cow and is ready to defend the peace of those who give Life in the broadest sense, and not force Life as cattle. That is, the country needs a leader with an emphasis on protecting Life from savage rapists who muzzled Life, which made women turn into women, draft horses, and men into infantile rags ....

        These are the deepest fundamental reasons why Russia needs Putin, the protector of Life ...
        1. 34 region
          34 region 27 December 2017 13: 00 New
          +1
          askme, 12:05. Economics and war are similar. Only conducted by different methods. Although modern wars are moving on to economic rails. With the normal organization of the economy, there is no need to yell at anyone. There is a general line, there is a plan. Today they are yelling at each other. Because the interests are different. Are common? A man needs to go to work. Buses do not go. What to do? Call a taxi? Taxi at this time is still sleeping and does not want to work. To buy a car? There is no money and rights. About the modern attitude of the owners and workers is not necessary. Mutual hatred. For cows, things are not so bad. Physiology is well studied. Artificial insemination, pregnancy, childbirth. What should be forced to make a cow? *** the country needs a leader with the emphasis on protecting Life from savage rapists who muzzled Life, which made women turn into women, draft horses, and men into infantile rags .... *** And why isn’t Putin doing this? Why do women have become like a draft horse, and men like rags? Why are women today selling themselves on the panel? From a good life? Or have you always dreamed about this? Somehow Putin didn’t protect the life of his people. Payment of housing and communal services in relation to salary does not fall. How many times could a USSR worker pay for housing and communal services with a salary of 200 rubles? How many times can an employee pay for housing and communal services today? Today, many families live paying for the housing and communal services with the salary of their wife, and eat their husband's salary. Wonderful protection !?
          1. askme
            askme 27 December 2017 13: 21 New
            +4
            Economics and war are similar. Only conducted by different methods.
            Yes, that is precisely the foundation of the communists. It was they who fought with their own people in the economy. On this and burned. You need to know this, especially young ones! The USSR was covered with shame, becoming the largest importer of wheat, having the largest areas of black soil in the world ... The Communists fought with the village for a long time. The Russian land itself sent a purely feminine fanatic-fanatic-communist ... The rest can not be read. Everything is self-evident. That is why the Communists have no chance in the future. The civil war in the country people will no longer allow. Scum, cutting people, is no longer in vogue in Russia in senior positions. And thank God!)
            1. 34 region
              34 region 27 December 2017 14: 17 New
              +6
              askme, 13:21. This is how they fought with their people? The village lived as a community. Collective farms created. But even they did not delay the purchase and maintenance of equipment. Created MTS. Agricultural production went uphill. Everything is very competent. There were a lot of cattle in the USSR. He was fed grain. Therefore, not only people ate wheat. Today, with a high yield, we export grain. No cattle, no one to feed. Why big crops? Probably wheat with GMOs and plus fertilizer plumped. Communism is the best relationship. Therefore, the oligarchs today live under communism and do not want to share it. And the capitalists are just fueling and supporting civil wars. This is very clearly seen in the BV and the outskirts.
              1. dSK
                dSK 27 December 2017 17: 00 New
                +1
                The highest salary in 2016 was at the Minister of Finance - 1,73 million rubles. per month, follows from the data of the Ministry of Finance. Based on the anti-corruption declaration of Anton Siluanov, the salary accounted for 22% of his income for 2016. The Minister of Economic Development and the Minister of Energy received half a million less - 1,27 million and 1,16 million rubles. respectively. The least of the federal ministers in 2016 was received by the head of the Ministry of Construction (443 thousand rubles per month) Mikhail Men and the head of the Ministry of Agriculture Alexander Tkachev (451 thousand rubles). Read more at RBC 27/12/2017.
                1. 34 region
                  34 region 28 December 2017 01: 22 New
                  +3
                  dsk, 17:00. Well, what is the economic rationale for precisely such salaries of ministers? About the minimum wage everything was justified. You can’t raise it, business will ruin! And the ministers mean communism, each according to his needs and do not care about the economy! Their salary absolutely does not destroy the business !?
            2. Gardamir
              Gardamir 27 December 2017 17: 03 New
              +7
              It was they who fought with their own people in the economy.
              You read it and it seems to be transferred to the end of the 80s. As I understand it, is everything in the economy for the people now? No homeless people, hospitals do not close, organic food stores ..?
              1. askme
                askme 27 December 2017 17: 16 New
                +5
                It’s all so simple: it’s you snickering right now, and in the late 80s the shelves of grocery stores were almost empty in the USSR, now you are thinking about the quality of the products, and then it was a question of the absence of often, in principle, normal products, especially meat, sausages , cheese and vegetables with fruits, buckwheat was in short supply, coupons appeared and the aggression of people on this occasion went wild, especially in the outback ... War - it is a war, with causes and effects, with flowers and berries ... Hence your associations ...

                Appreciate what you have. Otherwise, there is a chance to repeat the fate of those who took power in 1917, scattering hatred and discontent, and then they burned out in the fire of civilian hunger, etc., remembering the old government as paradise ....
                1. Gardamir
                  Gardamir 27 December 2017 17: 33 New
                  +4
                  at the end of 80's
                  1987-Tuapse, 1989-Murmansk, 1990-Leningrad, sorry I didn’t notice empty shelves.
                  Then there was the quality of the products, well, if only expired, now there are no natural products, well, if only Sechin’s in the basket.
                  In the outback everyone lived from their plots, so there was meat, milk, honey. Fruits and vegetables are understandable in the summer and fall.
                  Queues and aggression is the Gorbachev line for alcohol.
                  1. Vadim237
                    Vadim237 27 December 2017 18: 45 New
                    +1
                    Now there are no natural products - you speak for your stores.
                  2. a housewife
                    a housewife 28 December 2017 15: 42 New
                    +4
                    So did the wife go for groceries? In the queues, I remember, almost only women were pushing. Guys on the drum, where the grub on the table. Have you brought the money? Brought it! Is the rest an Indian affair?
                2. 34 region
                  34 region 28 December 2017 01: 36 New
                  +4
                  askme, 17:16. In the late 80s there was sabotage. To cause discontent among the people, a deficit was created. And the Soviet government is not so bad. In the 47th years we were the first to cancel the cards, not capitalist England. And about hunger there is no need to rub here that under capitalism it does not exist and did not exist. In the 30s, in the United States, when people overproduced food, people died of starvation. And products at that time were destroyed so that prices did not fall. And today, capitalism could not provide people with natural products. I couldn’t! And in the 22nd country pulled out of hunger. In the 32nd also pulled out. From the outskirts they claim that they were starved. But this is not so. Stalin raked the bins and slowed down the export of grain for salvation. And those who scattered hatred in the 17th are those who today have a moshna popping from a dough and a person like Sobchak. Here they are yelling and yelling about the infringement of their interests. Such a Russian division into white-rich, and poor-blacks. Only today, not racial discrimination, but class discrimination. Only for black workers is poverty. Only for the white-rich all the buns, blacks are not allowed! And some here at VO are very supportive of such discrimination!
        2. Svetlana
          Svetlana 28 December 2017 13: 48 New
          +1
          Quote: askme
          Once again: a cow cannot be made to milk with kicks - only with affection and care. And Russia needs a president who understands this.

          Let’s be presidential Kuklachev - he loves cats, which means that he is affectionate and caring. He will not encircle his government with matyukas, but gently stroke his head and sentence: what are you doing, Dimochka, getting up, ah-ah-yah, I won’t give you a chocolate bar today. And you Ellochka, my dear robber, what you have done, you won’t get lollipop. And you, Martyshkin, that you are carrying this, the people will not understand, go, silly, to the corner, wait there.
        3. Victor Demchenko
          Victor Demchenko 30 December 2017 13: 37 New
          +2
          another kremlebot .... how are you all tired, Lord, when will you get drunk ?!
          I don’t know how and where you studied, but even Vasya Pupkin can understand now, if the guarantor is satisfied with the work of the government, then there will be no changes for the better!
          What is Putin and his team for Russia today?
          firstly, the stagnation of the economy, see above the data of Rosstat, namely Rosstat, Karl! so there’s no truth about any growth in the Russian economy!
          secondly: corruption has already gone beyond all imaginable limits, and untouchables have bred like lice on a dirty bum!
          thirdly: as a result of economic stagnation, a sharp decrease in the purchasing power of the population occurred, which directly entails a further decline in production in all sectors.
          and to summarize:
          All is well, beautiful marquise ...
      2. Mikhail Filippov
        Mikhail Filippov 28 December 2017 13: 28 New
        +3
        Putin is a Chekist. He thinks in the language of special operations. Short special operations, not protracted wars
    3. Wayfarer
      Wayfarer 27 December 2017 19: 56 New
      14
      One wish, only with regard to voters: stop hoping and waiting, take out your outstretched hand pleading for alms, you are citizens of the richest and greatest country, go to the polls and vote for Grudinin so that our potential becomes a reality. We will be brainwashed in all media, convincing that the victory of the GDP is a foregone conclusion; Nothing of the kind, everything is in our hands. We go to the polls and vote. Someone will say-rig the election. It is quite possible, but we should not give in to despondency and give up, this is what they want from us, it is necessary for everyone to go to the polls, it is necessary to save Russia.
  2. Vasya Vassin
    Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 06: 41 New
    24
    We now have a normal candidate, but you can forget about that.
    1. AA17
      AA17 27 December 2017 11: 40 New
      22
      Dear, Vasya Vassin. I completely agree with you. We have a popular candidate. There were hopes for real changes in Russia. Yesterday, at about 19 o’clock, I accidentally switched to TV Russia1, got to the program for 60 minutes. P.N.Grudinin was present there. They discussed the moronic statement of the "Ukrainian philosopher" about Russia. Grudinin told the JOURNALISTS (I bring it close to the text) - why are you showing this, why are you paying the attention of our citizens to this nonsense, do we have our own problems ?. But most of all I liked how, usually unrestrained and boorish, Zhirinovsky V.V. turned to P. Grudinin. By name patronymic. There were respectful notes in the appeal. So the competitors of Pavel Nikolayevich Grudinin are afraid.
      P.S. It is NOT NECESSARY for OBJECTIVE reporters to attribute the victory of GDP in advance. So that later there would be no reason to say, well, we predicted the victory of GDP ..
      1. Vasya Vassin
        Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 21: 46 New
        11
        Hello, I hope you also noticed how biased and prejudiced, can we say in rude conduct behaved with the candidate? I think that Grudinin showed himself not bad, I especially liked the main topic of his entire policy that the interests of most ordinary people should be put at the forefront and attention should be focused on their problems. This is exactly what I have long wanted to hear.
        1. seos
          seos 29 December 2017 00: 15 New
          +2
          The presenters are normal and asked very correct questions to which Grudinin did not give an answer ... about questions about the Crimea and Donbass affiliation, he swam and began to bustle ...
          He also spoke out against counter-sanctions (in another statement) ... like we were being hollowed out and we should grow stronger and not answer ..
          He is a liberal! and liberals support him, and we don’t need such shit ....
          I am not for Putin, I am against the liberals ... after listening to a few videos with Grudinin, I clearly realized that this is not my candidate ..
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 December 2017 15: 54 New
      +5
      What kind of people is he in politics is not a boom in politics at all, he has no strategy, only notes of a hackneyed Communist Party record. Let him first work for several years under the government, gain weight and only then, by his achievements and work, will it be possible to judge whether he is fit for the presidency or not. Only suckers will call him, the multibillionaire, popular and instantly believe him, it's like buying underpants from hemorrhoids, for 80000, when watching the first commercial about them.
      1. Rastas
        Rastas 27 December 2017 21: 43 New
        +6
        Grudinin, hopefully not to go to work in the government. Who will he work with there? With Siluanov, Shuvalov, Oreshkin, Nabiullina, Dvorkovich, Mutko? Do you even think that you are writing. The only way out. Putin gives Grudinin the post of prime minister, but at the same time gives him complete freedom to form a team and implement his program. Approximately, as Yeltsin did in the fall of 98 for a short time with the Primakov government, so that they would lead the country out of the abyss. But this is fantastic.
  3. ImPerts
    ImPerts 27 December 2017 06: 49 New
    +8
    1) Ideology. In the end, we must decide who we are and what we are;
    2) Domestic policy. Time to throw stones and time to collect them. Centrifugal processes seem to have stopped. Now we need to untwist the flywheel of centripetal;
    3) Economics. But the economy cannot be built without ideological rails. All kind of Cherkizon is obtained.
    1. Ace Tambourine
      Ace Tambourine 27 December 2017 11: 43 New
      +4
      Article 15 of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation speaks of ideology in Russia .... it is simply prohibited ... we live under a striped carbon copy
      1. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 27 December 2017 14: 05 New
        +3
        Quote: Ace Tambourine
        Article 15 of the Basic Law of the Russian Federation speaks of ideology in Russia .... it is simply prohibited ... we live under a striped carbon copy

        On ideology, article 13 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
        In the Constitution of the Russian Federation there is no ban on ideology .. NO !!

        Here is what there:
        Constitution of the Russian Federation Chapter 1 Article 13
        "1. In the Russian Federation, ideological diversity is recognized.

        2. No ideology can be established as a state or mandatory.

        3. The Russian Federation recognizes political diversity, multi-party system.

        4. Public associations are equal before the law. "
        You catch the differences from NO ideology from what is in the Constitution of the Russian Federation
        On the other hand, the ruling party in the Russian Federation is the All-Russian political party "United Russia" - the Russian liberal-conservative political party, the largest political party of the Russian Federation, the "party of power" !!! According to the results of the 2003 and 2011 elections, "United Russia" was located in The State Duma by a majority, in 2007 and 2016 - by a constitutional majority. Political position: Right-wing. It seems to be clearly written LIBERALLY-Conservative.! On May 26, 2012, at the XIII Party Congress, Dmitry Medvedev was elected Chairman of the United Russia Party, who joined the congress party .. baptized !!
        December 23, 2017, Russian President Vladimir Putin spoke at the plenary meeting of the XVII Congress of the All-Russian political party United Russia. By the way, he himself said that he was at the helm of creating this party
        Now look at what liberal conservatism is ... in the economy ... with politics. In the social sphere. .... And much will become clear. Not to write that there is no ideology in the Russian Federation
        1. askme
          askme 27 December 2017 15: 02 New
          +2
          For those who are dull, I explain: in the cited text of the Constitution in legal language it is actually said that there is NO AND CAN NOT be any one state ideology in Russia, the state is outside ideology.
          1. badens1111
            badens1111 27 December 2017 15: 10 New
            0
            Quote: To be or not to be
            Now look at what liberal conservatism is ... in the economy ... with politics. In the social sphere. .... And much will become clear. Not to write that there is no ideology in the Russian Federation

            What is not clear?
          2. To be or not to be
            To be or not to be 27 December 2017 16: 30 New
            0
            I understand perfectly well that according to the existing system, the state is “above ideology”.
            This is the very thing that disguises the liberal ideology of the ruling party in Russia
            But scientists and lawyers justify it only whistle. Http: //constrf.ru/razdel-1/glava-1/st-13-
            krf
            1. Rastas
              Rastas 27 December 2017 21: 47 New
              +1
              There is an ideology in Russia. Social Darwinism is called.
  4. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 27 December 2017 07: 03 New
    31
    It seems to me that now there is more lies than under Gorbachev in 1990!
    1. 100502
      100502 27 December 2017 12: 22 New
      +7
      And what do you want the ruffled country rule, and clowns for public relations play power
  5. cedar
    cedar 27 December 2017 07: 05 New
    12
    First you need to remember that we are on the site of the MILITARY REVIEW ...
    Then look into the new US Strategic Security Concept 2017, and it says
    ""The United States and Europe will jointly oppose Russian subversion and aggression, as well as the threats posed by North Korea and Iran. ”
    From this stove we must dance to the electorate, which in fact should resist US-NATO subversive activities and aggression under the leadership of the President. Which according to the Constitution has NO power. Where did the authors of 17 years of Putin’s power come from?
    In short, the electorate, you confront, defend, fight, die and win under the leadership of the one you choose, i.e. Supreme Commander of the RF Armed Forces.
    1. Chichikov
      Chichikov 27 December 2017 08: 37 New
      +7
      At least one adequate comment! It seems that the information war against Russia is being waged, not only from outside!
    2. Gardamir
      Gardamir 27 December 2017 10: 06 New
      14
      Which, under the Constitution, has NO
      Did he take the Crimea? Did you win in Syria? Is there no power for the rest?
      Even over 17 years old. He was thrown into the Kremlin in 1996. Since August 1999 he was the head of government. then the president, then Medvedev replaced and now again the president. During the reign of which there is financial assistance to America.
      1. Chichikov
        Chichikov 27 December 2017 12: 11 New
        10
        Quote: Gardamir
        During the reign of which there is financial assistance to America

        During which, Russia, became RUSSIA.
        Looks like he’s still “young”, since you don’t remember or forgot what she represented in the 90s.
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 27 December 2017 12: 14 New
          17
          "young"
          I am so ancient that I remember the Union! And Putin's Russia, even in the face of it, is not good for that Union. As for the 90s, that’s enough, huh? Manuals need to be updated sometimes. Or did the oligarchs run out of money?
          1. Chichikov
            Chichikov 27 December 2017 12: 29 New
            +8
            Unsuccessful attempt, tint your image! There was no discussion of a comparison with the Union, which is probably why it was necessary to urgently duck it as a weighty argument.
            “Putin's Russia”, unlike the “Gorbachev and Yeltsin”, as jesters, is not invited to banquets and diplomatic receptions. And new manuals, the anti-Putin coalition, are being given around the corner - at the US embassy!
            1. Gardamir
              Gardamir 27 December 2017 12: 43 New
              18
              "Gorbachev and Yeltsin"
              Putin is a faithful Yeltsin. He puts monuments to his idol, because Yeltsin made a backlog for Putin in the "saints" of the 90s, but he continues. More country oligarchs. Glory to the liberals. Forget about the people. Here are Putin's slogans.
              and still change the training manual.
              1. Chichikov
                Chichikov 27 December 2017 18: 02 New
                +3
                Teach your wife to cook borscht!
                1. Vasya Vassin
                  Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 21: 56 New
                  +7
                  Chichikov, I am ashamed of you. As you were ... you stayed. But what else to expect from the seller of dead souls?
  6. inkass_98
    inkass_98 27 December 2017 07: 25 New
    25
    For the six remaining years, it is not possible to solve all the problems that have accumulated over the years.
    Bureaucracy: a crowd of Russian officials more than surpassed the USSR, in which the population was 2 times larger.
    Education: the squalor of school education and the completely idiotic Bologna system of higher education with an almost completely destroyed system of secondary vocational education are bearing fruit.
    Excessive centralization: Moscow turned into an octopus-vacuum cleaner, when tentacles are launched everywhere, there are practically no local manufactures, everything is under the control of the owner from Moscow. At the same time, local competition is stifled and prices are inflated. From the same huge difference in salaries in the field and in the center. And do not treat me with the fact that prices in Moscow are higher. This is not true.
    1. Alone
      Alone 27 December 2017 12: 46 New
      11
      Prices in Moscow are higher only for housing, but the rest is the opposite. For the rest, everything is absolutely true.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 27 December 2017 14: 45 New
        +3
        Housing is not a thing of everyday demand, there is no doubt here, in Moscow its prices are sky-high. But even here they grow quite fast, despite the freezing of salaries.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 December 2017 16: 00 New
      +2
      In Moscow there are few people who receive high salaries, so that they would live normally in Moscow, one must receive 60 - 80 and higher.
  7. Nonna
    Nonna 27 December 2017 08: 00 New
    +9
    One parting word - to work for the good of Russia so that the people do not curse you not during life, or after death. And so that the enemies of Russia were afraid of you even the dead.
  8. parusnik
    parusnik 27 December 2017 08: 00 New
    20
    Our wishes will not reach the "king-father", the "evil-hearted" will disappear ... smile ..One at the feeding trough, estranged and growing up to it, are torn ... That's all politics and ideology ...
    1. 100502
      100502 27 December 2017 12: 27 New
      +8
      Which king) his snout first in the trough
  9. Loess
    Loess 27 December 2017 08: 29 New
    +6
    Again, this "sweet couple" of authors whose forever is all bad. What I don’t understand is why their articles appear in the analytics section. In my opinion, there is a private opinion of the authors, often controversial. But analysts in their latest works are somehow not observed. More and more politics.
    1. Chichikov
      Chichikov 27 December 2017 08: 46 New
      +2
      A holy place is never empty! While journalists, practically “carrying the flag of Russia,” of both sexes, are rushing along the front lines in Syria and the Donbas, after all, someone needs to fill the created internal vacuum!
  10. Rimlianin
    Rimlianin 27 December 2017 08: 50 New
    33
    The article is another pile of stupidities. Over the 18 years at the helm, the incumbent has said a lot, but what has been really done? Fulfilled May decrees? Doubled GDP? And if you have not fulfilled the previous election promises, why are you going for a new term? Most of the population does not make ends meet, which has not happened since the 90s, there is enough salary for a week. The whole country is in loans, youth cannot buy housing and dress children. And all this against the background of the fact that during the reign of Putin hundreds of billions of dollars of national income were exported abroad, the number of dollar billionaires has increased tenfold. What could be the next term ?!
    1. Mestny
      Mestny 27 December 2017 12: 01 New
      +5
      Do I have enough money on the Internet?
      There will be, there will be the next term, and everyone like you knows this very well. The information war certainly bears fruit, but yours won’t succeed in defeating it this time.
      No clowns from the “fighters for truth and against corruption” even all taken together and stood close with the necessary knowledge and experience in managing a real country, especially such as Russia.
      As the saying goes, can you do better? Demonstrate at least in words. However, in words it all ends, given their combined nonsense of a cosmic scale and similar stupidity.
      1. 100502
        100502 27 December 2017 12: 29 New
        +3
        One hundred years ago, too, did not think)
        1. Vasya Vassin
          Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 21: 58 New
          +8
          Yes, they thought that autocracy was indestructible and that rolls could crunch endlessly. Now they think that it is possible to count the results of elections infinitely "correctly". But nature will find a way out ...
      2. Rimlianin
        Rimlianin 27 December 2017 18: 18 New
        11
        Quote: Mestny
        The information war certainly bears fruit, but yours won’t succeed in defeating it this time.

        Who is ours? Do you seriously think that the State Department and personally Senator McCain are behind critical posts on the network? Then you need to go to the nearest clinic, maybe ask for some pills to prescribe. No need to consider people as idiots, people see the real fruits of the current government’s policies since 1991 and draw conclusions. And since 1991, power has never changed.
        Quote: Mestny
        No clowns from the "fighters for the truth and against corruption"

        If someone criticizes Putin and his “team” critically, do you immediately write them down in Navalny’s sympotizants? Wake up, okromy Navalny in Russia, thank God there is another opposition.
        Quote: Mestny
        As the saying goes, can you do better? Demonstrate at least in words.

        Go hou at the state farm named after Lenin to Pavel Grudinin. He was able to create a normal life for his workers, at least within the framework of one economy. And after him all the patriots, do not confuse with the putriots.
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 December 2017 16: 03 New
      +4
      But GDP really didn’t double that - it increased 5 times from 13 trillion in 2000 to 92 trillion in 2017, taking into account inflation and two crises.
      1. To be or not to be
        To be or not to be 27 December 2017 17: 38 New
        +7
        quote = Vadim237] But GDP really didn’t double - it raised 5 times from 13 trillion in 2000 to 92 trillion in 2017, taking into account inflation and two crises. [/ quote]
        Thank you! Now I understand why the servants of the people get more people hired them [

        The Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation for the first time released data on the salaries of Russian ministers for the past year.
        From the published information it follows that the highest salary among the heads of departments last year was received by the head of the Minister of Finance Anton Siluanov - 1,729 million rubles a month.
        Read more: https://eadaily.com/en/news/2017/12/27/minfin-obn
        arodoval-dannye-o-zarplatah-rossiyskih-ministrov
        1. Rimlianin
          Rimlianin 27 December 2017 18: 28 New
          +8
          Quote: To be or not to be
          And GDP really didn’t double that - it raised 5 times from 13 trillion in 2000 to 92 trillion in 2017, this is taking into account inflation and two crises

          brazenly lying. in 2000, GDP was $ 2059,8 billion; in 2015, $ 3531,9 billion. dollars. and since 2013, it has fallen by almost 100 billion. That's the source -
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%92%D0%92%D
          0% 9F_% D0% A0% D0% BE% D1% 81% D1% 81% D0% B8% D0% B8 Where is it twice? 70 percent, no more. And we must bear in mind that all this "growth" is mainly associated with rising oil prices in the zero years, there is no merit of Putin V.V. Oil prices fell, and GDP began to fall.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 27 December 2017 18: 51 New
            +2
            For 2017, non-PPP GDP of 92 trillion rubles
            1. Rimlianin
              Rimlianin 27 December 2017 19: 05 New
              +4
              My dear, look not at the value of GDP in ruble terms, which depreciated several times over all this time, but in dollars by purchasing power. This is the fourth column. And you will see the figures I have cited. Moreover, the dollar also depreciated somewhat during this time. so the real numbers are even lower.
              1. Vadim237
                Vadim237 27 December 2017 20: 48 New
                0
                In Russia, the budget is formed, and with it the financing of all, not from the PPP GDP, but from the GDP which shows the real growth of the economy.
  11. Olgovich
    Olgovich 27 December 2017 09: 48 New
    +8
    This statement
    Yes, it’s no secret that Russia It lives mainly due to the export of oil and gas. Here really, than rich. We are sitting on the needle, for her, dear, even fighting.
    This contradicts this a bit:
    The money earned from the sale of resources should go to the development of the country as a whole, and not go abroad

    We will not forget, in addition, that in large oil and gas companies, the state is the largest shareholder.
    Foreign political victories are more than strange: they give us sanctions and humiliations, we give them oil, gas, rocket engines and everything else.
    For some reason, there is a desire for a really solid course and not inflated victories.
    The economy of Russia is many times smaller than the economy of opponents, i.e. weaker, this dictates the behavior: stretch the legs along the clothes.
    Yamal-LNG project. Yes, plant, infrastructure, benefits to the enterprise
    And also, work for the Russians, taxes to the budget, the development of the North, the growth of trade. Is it really enough?
    And along with the president’s remarks about how terrible and sad everything was in the Soviet Union, there is an exaltation of other ideals.
    No he has such that “everything was terrible.” And he repeatedly emphasized this. And what was terrible, must and must speak knowbecause it was with our by the people.
    The USSR Armed Forces, the State Duma adopted laws that fix: millions of people were illegally repressed, killed and rehabilitated. And these people whose graves - unknown - deserve a monument - the Wall of Sorrow. These are our Compatriots. The same with the official condolences of the state to the millions of victims of the famine of 1933, which the USSR never mentioned anywhere. But the vast majority of them-Russian people, our compatriots.
    The Yeltsin Center will eventually turn into its antipode-ANTIeltsin sure. Alekseeva-disarming trolling of liberals and the West (although I do not approve).

    But in general, GOOD LUCK to Vladimir Vladimirovich: “Let's make Russia great again!”
    1. badens1111
      badens1111 27 December 2017 15: 30 New
      +6
      Quote: Olgovich
      But in general

      A set of LIES .. as always.
      1. Olgovich
        Olgovich 27 December 2017 15: 40 New
        +2
        Quote: badens1111
        A set of LIES .. as always.

        A set of TRUTH, as always. yes
        PS Where is Pantsyr, t baned ?! belay
    2. mih_sergeev92
      mih_sergeev92 27 December 2017 23: 23 New
      0
      Few Romanians in the PMR crushed.
  12. Gardamir
    Gardamir 27 December 2017 09: 54 New
    23
    I am not an opponent, I am an opponent of the current president.
    He does not have any foreign policy victories. An example of this is the case with the Olympics and disrespect for the symbols of the state from those in power and personally from the president.
    the economic bloc isn’t even a shake-up, it’s high time to understand that the “invisible hand of the market” is the road to nowhere.
    about the oligarchs, it was the current president who came to power who immediately abolished the progressive tax.
    Our ideology is one liberalism, but especially implicated in hatred of everything Russian. And as a continuation of love and admiration for everything Western, American.
    But the Constitution, even such, is not respected by the authorities.
    1. Chichikov
      Chichikov 27 December 2017 18: 04 New
      0
      And on such "articles", such "patriots" of Russia, just flock - like flies ......
      1. Siberia 9444
        Siberia 9444 27 December 2017 19: 59 New
        +4
        Judging by the pluses, he is not the only one who thinks so, Chichikov from Ukraine knows who the patriots are and hero! So, a pan on the head and on the Maidan
        1. Chichikov
          Chichikov 27 December 2017 20: 41 New
          +2
          You’ll tell it to those who dance in Ukraine, and how fascist Ukraine is good at Russian political shows, and I, Russian, am a citizen of New Russia and a supporter of Putin. What I am proud of!
          1. Siberia 9444
            Siberia 9444 28 December 2017 02: 40 New
            +7
            And I am Russian from Siberia and not Putin’s old-timer, and I’m proud of it, he taxed the people and drove him to a niche! Children from all over the country are being collected for treatment !! Shame on my country! You are still a question that you are Russian and from Novorosia
          2. Romey
            Romey 29 December 2017 07: 55 New
            0
            Quote: Chichikov
            You’ll tell it to those who dance in Ukraine, and how fascist Ukraine is good at Russian political shows, and I, Russian, am a citizen of New Russia and a supporter of Putin. What I am proud of!

            Where is this New Russia? And whose merit is that she left a pathetic in the full sense of the word stub in the form of LDNR? Who invented the Minsk harlot? What are you a citizen of New Russia. The one whom you support so much and who are proud of directly and unequivocally said, sho tse Ukraine. Yes, and how are you going to support him if you even don’t have normal passports there? "Corps" that the APU will take out once or twice at the first opportunity?
  13. Galleon
    Galleon 27 December 2017 10: 01 New
    12
    I was waiting for a similar article. Thanks to the authors. The essence is indicated correctly, the emphasis is placed correctly. From the experience of previous years, I can add that everything written here may even be repeated by Pu himself, but will not do any of this. Upstairs there they are remarkably aware of what we need and what we want, but in no way are they going to provide us with this. Because if we get what we want, they will have nothing to promise.
    1. CONTROL
      CONTROL 27 December 2017 13: 41 New
      +5
      Quote: Galleon
      Because if we get what we want, they will have nothing to promise.

      How is it nothing?
      The possibilities to desire are truly unlimited! Well, I’ll get a trough ... a hut ... there is still something (according to the list) ... so she will want a mistress of the sea! (read Pushkin, "The Tale of the Golden Fish")!
      1. Galleon
        Galleon 27 December 2017 14: 00 New
        +3
        Well, if you educate a qualified consumer - then, of course - to infinity. The end result should be a person who is not completely satisfied, like a cadaver in the Strugatsky wassat or an old woman at an old man. But we really don’t really need that much, but we understand ...
        1. CONTROL
          CONTROL 27 December 2017 14: 57 New
          +4
          Quote: Galleon
          a person who is not absolutely satisfied, like a cadaver in the Strugatsky wassat or an old woman at an old man. But we really don’t really need that much, but we understand ...

          The Strugatskys have one cadaver, I remember, bursting - having gluttonized herring with milk (and splattered everyone ...); but another! - wow! - done things!
          ... and the old woman at Pushkin screwed up ...
    2. Victor Demchenko
      Victor Demchenko 30 December 2017 13: 52 New
      0
      and therefore the conclusion:
      ALL FOR ELECTIONS!
  14. Greenwood
    Greenwood 27 December 2017 10: 55 New
    11
    "The mice cried, pricked, but continued to nibble the cactus." - this is about the authors of the article. They recalled all the failures of Russia's foreign policy, described in great detail the deplorable domestic political and economic situation in Russia, expressed their thoughts about the need for at least a partial return to the Soviet system, but again gently hinted at Putin’s urgently needed deadline, about a chance to change everything, quotas trust and even in general the general correctness of the course, which only needs to be “corrected". Well, believe what. Hope. 17 years was not enough.
  15. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 27 December 2017 11: 28 New
    17
    COUNTRY faces THREE problems - economics, social justice, criminal procedure justice. 26.12.2017/20/40, the president speaks and praises the government, here’s Krylov’s fable: “the cuckoo praises the rooster for praising the cuckoo,” who is the supreme power holder in RUSSIA according to the Constitution - THE PEOPLE OF RUSSIAN, THE PEOPLE say that the government works very poorly it turns out that the president is deceiving his people, poorly said, he is a lawyer, must fulfill the will of the PEOPLE. Sorry, I'm not talking about the economy, from 20 to 1 million. RUSSIAN CITIZENS live below the poverty line according to official sources (they themselves can’t even figure it out). What kind of economy can we talk about? Social justice ratio of 30: 1, incomes of the rich and poor, according to other sources 147: 25. Criminal procedural justice, what law enforcement, supervisory, and judicial authorities do is simply incomprehensible to the mind. Watch the program “Moment of Truth” by Karaulov and others. What WE hear in response from the president and his press secretary is not in the Kremlin’s competence, it’s easiest to hide behind the Kremlin wall. Why is it not in your competence if all branches of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches work poorly, and sometimes simply criminally, who should correct them? Correct the snickering, impudent officials, at the very top, WHO, according to the Constitution - GUARANTEE OF THE CONSTITUTION. All their activity or inaction directly affects XNUMX million. THE POPULATION OF RUSSIA, who, if not YOU, should harshly, and sometimes cruelly, ask these officials. The May decrees were not implemented, XNUMX million new jobs were not created, not a single federal minister, deputy prime minister, and the prime minister himself were punished, fired from work. They say the president is not giving up his own, and that the bulk of RUSSIAN CITIZENS are not their own, for the sake of a handful of stupid, mediocre officials, the majority of PEOPLE suffer, it turns out their interest is YOU put above the interests of PEOPLE. Conclusion, all your election proposals, decisions simply will not be implemented. There is no political will and desire!
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 December 2017 16: 04 New
      +2
      Below the poverty line in Russia live 14% of the population.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 27 December 2017 16: 13 New
        0
        And this figure is far from critical.
        1. Vasya Vassin
          Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 22: 02 New
          +1
          Say this with 14 percent, and even consider whether they really REALLY have so many!
  16. turbris
    turbris 27 December 2017 11: 42 New
    +6
    I also expected a similar article, it is fully consistent with the anti-Putin policy that is carried out on the site in articles and comments by bloggers. The idea is simple - to make everything that was good, to make bad, and that which failed, to bring to the level of disaster. Everything that is written in the article was already in the comments of individual bloggers, and regardless of the topic of discussion. The main thing that hides behind descriptions of various wishes is this:
    “March 2018 will show the level of trust in Putin. In two figures: the turnout and the number of people who voted against him. Of course, the so-called administrative resource can win at least 89%, but ...” That is, the authors are preparing us beforehand that the elections will not be fair, will be involved administrative resource, although Putin will win, but ......, let's organize a new Swamp. This is an information war, and an attempt to intervene in the upcoming elections on the part of states that the authors are very sympathetic to.
  17. Boris55
    Boris55 27 December 2017 13: 30 New
    +5
    Quote: R. Skomorokhov, A. Staver
    Yes, it is no secret that Russia lives mainly from oil and gas exports. Here really, than rich. We are sitting on the needle, for her, my dear, even fighting

    Lies!
    In the country's budget for next year, the oil and gas component is only 1/3. It would be the greatest stupidity not to use what God has sent us.

    Quote: R. Skomorokhov, A. Staver
    And I would like to replace the Minister of Sports ... the Minister of Education ... the Minister of Culture .... the Minister of Finance ... the Minister of Economic Development ...

    In order to change one for another, it would be necessary to decide what we are building, what is the ultimate goal, and only then, for these tasks, to select people for these goals. As long as the goals are not voiced, everyone is free to think whatever he wants.

    Quote: R. Skomorokhov, A. Staver
    Ideology. ... A complete seemingly lack thereof,

    What nonsense ?! We have a sea of ​​party and each of them has its own ideology. In the elections - choose any. Do you call for the dictatorship of one party? You have everything in chocolate and you dream to fix your current situation? Do not keep us insane. Do not deprive us of the right to choose!

    Quote: R. Skomorokhov, A. Staver
    Putin has been in power since 2000. 18 years at the time of the election.

    What was your arithmetic ?! If you have no idea how power is structured, then how can you write something about power?
    Putin is a representative of the security forces defending the independence of Russia. Medvedev is the representative of the bourgeois who dream of surrendering Russia to the joy of the world corporation of exploiters. They have different target vectors. If you do not understand this - do not try to write about it!
    1. Greenwood
      Greenwood 27 December 2017 16: 22 New
      10
      Quote: Boris55
      In order to change one for another, it would be necessary to decide what we are building, what is the ultimate goal, and only then, for these tasks, to select people for these goals.
      But Putin has had the same people on the team for 20 years, since working in the St. Petersburg administration. And nobody really changes.
      Quote: Boris55
      You have it all in chocolate
      Who is it with you?
      Quote: Boris55
      Putin is a representative of the security forces defending the independence of Russia. Medvedev is the representative of the bourgeois who dream of surrendering Russia to the joy of the world corporation of exploiters. They have different target vectors. If you do not understand this - do not try to write about it!
      And how did it happen that Medvedev has been working with Putin almost since the 90s. Putin entrusted Medvedev with ruling the country for 4 years, and then appointed him head of government ?! And now he declares that he is completely satisfied with the work of the government. Those. this is one team with quite common goals and a single motion vector. So stop fantasizing here out of the blue.
      1. Boris55
        Boris55 27 December 2017 18: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Greenwood
        ... And nobody really changes.

        Does not change anyone - where? If the people in all elections vote for the bourgeois party, can Putin go against the will of the people?
        Quote: Greenwood
        Who is it with you?

        For those who call for changing Article 13 and paragraph 2 of the Constitution of Russia and appointing one ideology as the main. The ideology of which party will be assigned as the main one is not difficult to guess - it will be the ideology of the EP party, the bourgeois party.
        Quote: Greenwood
        And how did it happen that Medvedev has been working with Putin almost since the 90's.

        The country is governed by clan-corporate groups. Putin and Medvedev are representatives of these groups, fulfilling their will. If you think that Putin controls Medvedev, then you don’t understand anything about governing the country.
        Quote: Greenwood
        Those. this is one team with quite common goals and a single motion vector.

        For clarity of their "unity":


        Compare how president Medvedev acted with Libya, and how president Putin acted with Syria. If, then, in Libya they would give the aggressor the teeth, there would be no Syria. Do you still think that Putin controls Medvedev?
        1. Sergey Cojocari
          Sergey Cojocari 28 December 2017 13: 53 New
          +4
          Do you want to convince us that this “misunderstanding” is stirring Putin?
  18. CONTROL
    CONTROL 27 December 2017 14: 32 New
    +3
    It makes you think and appreciate!
    Is everything so good and cloudless "in manual control mode"?
    ----------------------------------------------
    Well, yes, the main “probable adversary” has dozens of times more GDP, and finally it’s cooler, and Trump with a gorgeous “architectural masterpiece” on the head ... Only now - for 20 years now as normal analysts and economists (and not popular observers Media!) Do not consider GDP as an indicator of the state of the economy any countries in the current global financial speculative economy!
    -------------------------------
    Further: - alas, corruption in modern Russia is a system-forming factor; without it, everything just starts to fall apart! Checked already ... So that "planting" - only potatoes, cucumbers and a tomato !!! Ulyukaev is an exception, poor and unhappy (two "green lemons" for the Minister of Economic Development and Trade are, you see, a trifle for pocket expenses; when the head of the administration of a not-too-rich region makes about two times a month more ... almost legally (it’s about personal income)!
    ---------------------------------
    According to sociologists, the stable social situation in the country persists with a gap in incomes of the richest and poorest segments of the population (able-bodied!) 7-10 times, with a ratio of the numbers of these layers the most - and the most +) 6 / 1. In Russia, these figures: excess of wealth over poverty by 30 times or more! with a ratio of the number of these 30/1.
    --------------------------------
    A radical, purely liberal attitude to the social policy of the state is a reliance on business, a market with "invisible tentacles" ...
    Under capitalism, no business and no capitalist will not voluntarily strengthen social programs !!! The essence of capitalism is personal enrichmentrather than improving the welfare of some hard worker, office plankton, or even a state in which I, the business / capitalist, are located and doing my own gesheft ... except for fear of repression and the long arm of Moscow, Washington, and Berlin -Paris-London and others ... and even that - don’t scare, I’ll go offshore!
    So - the social network is entirely on the conscience and responsibility of the state! What is the state for? A. - ensure the protection of its borders and population with material values ​​from an external enemy; B. ensure the same thing - from the internal enemy (crime, political position ...) C. ensure the fair distribution of the total product and social benefits (salaries, pensions, healthcare there ... supplement yourself ...) D. to ensure a stable future at the expense of the "unproductive" components of human civilization: the creation and accumulation of experience through scientific knowledge, education, culture, the creation of a certain necessary for the population! - national-territorial mentality through the same culture, public education, religion (yes, yes!); and maintaining all this uniformity (diversity?) in an appropriate steady state ...
    --------------------------
    Well, you can add a few points - those who wish can strain ...
    And the military are a priori imprisoned effective destruction, this is their main professional function - alas, a necessity, with all due respect and partial belonging to this category! and “retraining” the spirit of destruction, the mentality is not easy; and if it’s simple, then what kind of person are you, on ... a professional? !!
    -----------------------------------
    ... well, is this perhaps the main thing?
    Next - it’s worth switching to VHF waves, to be brief - so that you hear ...
    ---------------------------------
    (And Grudinin - too much resembles a "hidden tiger", which can become a "dragon." A capitalist who does not want to part with capital to strengthen the state - ............... ????
    But such were in Russia - for example, Sergey Ivanovich Maltsev (1810-1893); Yes, and today there are ...)
  19. 16112014nk
    16112014nk 27 December 2017 17: 57 New
    +6
    Quote: 34 region
    a man like Stalin should lead the country


    Complete opposite!
    1. Sadam
      Sadam 28 December 2017 01: 15 New
      +3
      ))))))))))))))))
      labserdak and adidas in trainers))))) some sort of hat
  20. cedar
    cedar 27 December 2017 18: 14 New
    +2
    Quote: 16112014nk
    Quote: 34 region
    a man like Stalin should lead the country


    Complete opposite!


    Russia then and now, everywhere has its own people ...
    Sovereignty. Russia. Putin
  21. Gardamir
    Gardamir 27 December 2017 19: 14 New
    0
    Wish for the New Year.
  22. andrej-shironov
    andrej-shironov 27 December 2017 19: 35 New
    +8
    There will be no wishes to Putin! This is not our president. The main thing is how many percent will come to the polls! The Kremlin is interested in formal legitimization of the elections! But they are unlikely to be legitimate.
  23. Cat Marquis
    Cat Marquis 27 December 2017 19: 57 New
    +4
    We are waiting for March ...

    Today so casually asked his daughter (recently turned 18): for whom she will vote: probably for Sobchachka? The one doing something there in a notebook (studying in B) without stopping answered: ".... For Putin ... or ... I won’t go at all ..." I asked why you won’t go? She replied (again, not looking up from her notebook): "And what's the difference? If I vote for Putin, they will give my vote to Putin, and if I do not go to the polls, they will still give my vote to Putin ... that is no difference .... "And you say youth is stupid .... wink
    1. Vasya Vassin
      Vasya Vassin 27 December 2017 22: 05 New
      +4
      Yes, many people think so. But if I vote, then I will know WHO I VOTED FOR!
  24. Ivan58
    Ivan58 27 December 2017 21: 05 New
    +4
    To occupy a normally-weighted foreign policy. And then: they are confiscation of property, we: and let us help you put out the fires in California. Do we need it? But inside. Confused cosmodromes. And why doesn’t it still bring down the taiga for laying the Power of Siberia with a jigsaw, well, or something else. But why is Nabiulina not yet teaching arithmetic in elementary school? And then inflation is 4%, and gasoline has risen in price from January 1, 2017 from 35 to 38, this is the 92nd. In general, you can ad infinitum, although I know that to no avail. I’ll go to the polls.
  25. Overlock
    Overlock 27 December 2017 22: 39 New
    +3
    Quote: cedar
    The President. Which, under the Constitution, has NO

    I do not understand? And then Putin is eager for President again? To vandalize and do nothing? After all, he has no power! So let him go to the premieres, there is where to restore order, and there is enough power!
  26. Overlock
    Overlock 27 December 2017 22: 48 New
    +1
    Quote: Boris55
    Compare what President Medvedev did to Libya and what President Putin did to Syria. If then in Libya they would give the aggressor the teeth, there would be no Syria

    but "push" that is? Do you seriously believe that Russia will be able to confront the EU and the United States in the unfolding of a full-scale financial and economic war?
    This is a complete tear in society! Russia was not crushed only because there are opponents to the strangulation of Russia (Germany) in the camp. Otherwise, we would have again stormed the grocery stores and didn’t know about Libya or Syria.
  27. mih_sergeev92
    mih_sergeev92 27 December 2017 23: 19 New
    +2
    Up there, as Zadornov said, everything is in the zone, all because of attendants. Therefore, positive changes, not related to the ability to earn money, are hardly worth the wait. Born to give can not.
  28. turbris
    turbris 28 December 2017 12: 20 New
    0
    Quote: Overlock
    Do you seriously believe that Russia will be able to confront the EU and the United States in the unfolding of a full-scale financial and economic war?
    This is a complete tear in society! Russia was not crushed only because there are opponents to the strangulation of Russia (Germany) in the camp. Otherwise, we would have again stormed the grocery stores and didn’t know about Libya or Syria.

    Think original! So Germany protected us from total strangulation, and did it initiate sanctions against Russia after it supported the coup in Ukraine? What kind of discord in the society are you talking about, while this is only observed in you.
  29. jackomb
    jackomb 28 December 2017 13: 34 New
    +4
    I would like to add that the main thing is to change the premiere. Well, what can be a manager from a theoretical lawyer? He did not even work as a legal adviser at the enterprise. How can he know the specifics of governing the country if he does not know basic things. He's just a "parquet lawyer"
  30. Clone
    Clone 28 December 2017 14: 30 New
    +2
    . absolutely corrupt courts, works exclusively for the benefit of the oligarchy.
    The wedding of the daughter of the Krasnodar “golden judge” Khakhaleva “thundered” throughout the country. So what? And absolutely ... nothing. All remained in their own interests. If anyone was following the intercepted telephone conversations, then she and a certain “Vladimir Vladimirovich” did not have a decree ...
    That's how we live. With wishes that no one is going to fulfill. And with hopes ... FIG knows what and for whom.
    So that there will not be any misunderstandings, I will vote for Putin or the representative of the Communist Party.
  31. a housewife
    a housewife 28 December 2017 15: 33 New
    +1
    Yeah, I got it right away! What is the reservation? As for the American president, there is no authority. From the word at all. I don’t want to go into anything further. There are such specialists, it’s not for me — they’ll take apart the bones. Only one. Many adored Stalin here - headed the country that won the huge terrible war. And how - strongly did the West admit that we won? If they acknowledge it, they will certainly add that without their precious help we would not have not won, but would have simply disappeared. Where is the authority of Stalin?
  32. Vladimir Avakimov
    Vladimir Avakimov 28 December 2017 18: 46 New
    0
    Vote for VVZH!
  33. seos
    seos 29 December 2017 00: 19 New
    0
    Quote: Gardamir
    Which, under the Constitution, has NO
    Did he take the Crimea? Did you win in Syria? Is there no power for the rest?
    Even over 17 years old. He was thrown into the Kremlin in 1996. Since August 1999 he was the head of government. then the president, then Medvedev replaced and now again the president. During the reign of which there is financial assistance to America.

    And Grudinin directly calls for an agreement with the enemy, to make concessions to him, etc. .. in general Grudinin = Yelitsyn 2.0
  34. gsev
    gsev 29 December 2017 05: 26 New
    0
    "As an example, there is a scandal surrounding our diplomatic property in the United States. There have been many angry speeches by our politicians. Foreign Ministry statements. And so? Actually, nothing.
    But in general - spitting in the face, comparable to the pre-Olympic show.
    And the victory in Syria? No one in Russia doubts that Russia made the main contribution to this victory. Sorry, today any European and American will tell you that Russia has cleverly clung to the victory over terrorism. The coalition fought for a long time and almost won. And then the cunning Russians appeared. Appeared to steal a victory. "

    Like cool words. It seems the complete impotence of Russia.
    But if in the 80s it were not the USA, but a small country at the end of the world, that would sever diplomatic relations with the USSR, it would confiscate its diplomatic property. I think the leadership of the country would also not make sudden movements other than mirror movements. That’s what happened when in Beijing, the guanbines hooligans around our embassy. Our restrained reaction then helped to restore good neighborly relations with the PRC in the 90s, which Russia needs as it is now. The Iranians even arrested US embassy workers. In my opinion, and in the 50s, our vocational schools were brought down to smash the embassies of the Western powers. Father told me that they seemed to break all the windows up to the 4th floor, but they couldn’t beat anything at the 5th floor. So the State Department skidded, but against the general background is not very strong. The largest budget, the largest science, the largest armed forces give the United States the right to independence. And in diplomacy, restraint and sanity prevent very large losses. Remember your analysis in 15 years.

    Regarding the statement of the Americans on Syria, they will not play along with us. Until the Syrians stop the strife, their country will be robbed, smashed to pieces. And all the participants in this robbery will make high-profile statements as they see fit. Neither the USSR was able to close Radio Liberty nor the United States closed Russia Today. Capitulant statements are seldom made even in a completely hopeless situation. But then they don’t care about anyone.
    A vivid example; Goebels, a few days before poisoning his daughters, ordered Berlin to cover with leaflets "In this war, everything is possible except the surrender of Germany"

    And in the presented tips, Putin does not see many problems that need to be solved, which are being successfully solved. And if you look back at a time when an unknown politician replaced Yeltsin, then his rivals in the first election did not dream of promising what he managed to do.

    A simple, inconspicuous example. About 15 years ago, herds of pickpockets and purses from all over Europe walked around Moscow, grazing in every major store. Who met them last year. Maybe they fled to Vilna Ukraine.
  35. AleBors
    AleBors 30 December 2017 18: 46 New
    0
    "everyone who read has something to add from himself." There are words, but unfortunately, almost all are obscene.
  36. sds87
    sds87 30 December 2017 19: 33 New
    +3
    I remember when I was in school, and it was in the period 1994-2004, the teachers were given to us according to Soviet patterns, again, of Soviet hardening. In the tenth grade, I first participated in the test exam. I sat in the class and checked the tests. He entered the institute in Moscow in 2005. But the exam was not there - the university is architectural. I passed Russian (essay) and mathematics (tasks) and a number of institute specialized examinations. What am I talking about? And the fact that education reform programs in Russia went under Putin. He first became president on March 26 in 2000. Under him, they began to optimize the country and still can not calm down. Everyone is shouting about privatization in the 90s and the destruction of industry, but few who say that this continues under Putin, just do not advertise in large numbers. Enterprises are closing down, medicine is being utilized, education is collapsing, and talking about art is scary - degradation and a decline in morals. They say: they began to live, it seems, better. Apartments, cars, office and shopping centers - all multiply and multiply. But at the same time, schools, kindergartens, parks, parking lots, clinics are for some reason forgotten. People take loans, mortgages and everything goes and goes from all over Russia to Moscow and Moscow Region. Why? Indeed, according to the media, everything is fine in our regions. Only people flee from there if money appears. And why - yes, because Moscow is a state in a state. It’s worth crossing the border and the level of salaries is different at times and there is work. Even the near Moscow suburbs with Moscow differ in pay times. I see what the authorities did with my city - Odintsovo. It was destroyed by building. This is the ghetto. What does Putin have to do with it? Despite the fact that all the heads of the cities near Moscow are adherents of EP. The party of power, supported by the president, like an octopus, launched its tentacles in all the lucrative places. Vorobyov - Governor of Moscow Oblast - former creditor of EP (Since 2000, in the civil service, was an assistant to the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation S.K. Shoigu. In 2012, Vorobyov said that Shoigu is his godfather in politics. Since 2000, he was the founder and the president of the Interregional Public Fund for Supporting the United Russia Party. Member of the party since 2003.) together with Chubais - they are building up the Moscow Region. All these people are one team. Putin put them, cultivated and tamed, fed from a spoon. All those whom we call thieves, corrupt officials and enemies of Russia.

    Surkov, Medvedev, Ivanov, Chubais, Lesin and others at Putin's campaign headquarters in 2000.
    1. turbris
      turbris 30 December 2017 20: 38 New
      0
      sds87- and you know that in the suburbs there is a governor, and in Odintsovo-mayor and for these proteges, as you put it, it was you who voted. Of course, you entered the institute in Moscow honestly, didn’t anyone want anything, just like that overpowered everything with your head? Or did relatives or people involved in the exams help? This is me about the exam, just now with the help of the exam come without all this. I don’t know how it is in Odintsovo, but I often go to Istra and somehow everything does not fit your description. So in vain did you compose your opus, send it to your local authorities, replacing the name of the president with the name of your governor or weakly?
      1. sds87
        sds87 30 December 2017 21: 06 New
        0
        Quote: turbris
        Moscow Region is the governor, and in Odintsovo Mayor and for these proteges, as you put it, it was you who voted.

        I did not vote for them. Somehow they were put forward and they sat on the seats prepared for them.
        Quote: turbris
        Of course, you entered the institute in Moscow honestly, didn’t anyone want anything, just like that overpowered everything with your head?

        Acted honestly on a budget. No bribes. Have you had anything else? Do not judge all by yourself.
        Quote: turbris
        I often go to Istra and there somehow it does not fit your description.

        Istra is not Odintsovo, and not Chemists and no other similar urbanized city. There, I think of the point building with multi-story residential towers for many years without burdening extra. there was no infrastructure.
        Quote: turbris
        So in vain you composed your opus, send it to your local authorities

        And the local authorities also unsubscribed. And I also comment on my city news resource. Do not worry. There they do not like Vorobyov from the word - no way. And I signed a petition against his resignation. Only these petitions do not bother anyone. Vorobyov - his own and does not greet with "his" - means in the "clip" to the end. Yes, and our mayor - Gusev behaves "quieter than water, lower than grass" and calmly signs new objects of point development. They also tried to complain about him, but from him like water off a duck. Always dry out of the water. To each his own, isn't it, dear turbris. I am sincerely glad that where you live - everything is fine. Unfortunately in Russia, far from everywhere is good ...
  37. turbris
    turbris 30 December 2017 20: 22 New
    0
    Quote: Siberia 9444
    And I am Russian from Siberia and not Putin’s old-timer, which I’m proud of

    Can you clarify where you are from Siberia, and then it turns out that it’s not Russian, so what are you proud of?
    1. ventich62
      ventich62 31 December 2017 11: 12 New
      +1
      I am Russian, from the Urals. Not a supporter of Putin. The stronghold of common sense. I’m not proud of it. This is just a reaction of a normal person to what is happening and an elementary analysis of the situation. For reference - not a liberal, rather the opposite. And then everywhere is full of fans to paint the world in black and white. If not a supporter of Putin, then immediately a liberoid and a Western agent.
  38. Stilet
    Stilet 31 December 2017 10: 20 New
    +1
    But who will read our wishes and who needs them? Some kind of kindergarten at the end of the year ..... Go better Olivier prepare gentlemen advisers - New Year is coming!
  39. ventich62
    ventich62 31 December 2017 11: 06 New
    +1
    Authors. Are there too many wishes, there is a second stagnation and a cult of personality. By the way, the cult was also reflected in you - you don’t even think that someone else could be the president. I have. Grudinin.
    Maybe it’s easier to start from scratch, a person who is not burdened with obligations to friends, “talented” businessmen, prime ministers, ministers, etc.? He doesn’t give a damn about your wishes. GDP does not even go to debate, so as not to spoil your mood. Your article is correct, but the conclusions are paradoxical. Hope that something changes in the next 6 years. Nothing will change!!! Need another.
  40. sa-ag
    sa-ag 31 December 2017 14: 56 New
    0
    It’s useless to post orders here, because the government does not serve your interests if you are worth less than a billion
  41. Douglasrodgers
    Douglasrodgers 2 January 2018 13: 38 New
    0
    Hi, Do you have a financial problem? Do you have accounts to settle? or do you need a loan to create a profitable business? or for other purposes? Are you looking for loans elsewhere and you were disappointed? Don’t worry, dear friend. Financial firm Douglas Rodgers Guaranteed reliable loans with simple steps, no credit checks, no collateral and a low interest rate of 2%.
    Contact us today through [email protected]
    Call us: +359884829222