Anti-aircraft missile system Red Sky 2

42
Anti-aircraft missile system Red Sky 2


The Red Sky 2 SHORAD anti-aircraft missile system from Israel Military Industries is a modular system that integrates external sensors and man-portable air defense [left] [/ left] complexes (MANPADS). The system provides passive round-the-clock observation, automatic notification of target detection and strikes against designated targets, optimizing decision-making during shooting. Red Sky expands the capabilities of existing MANPADS systems, which are currently limited by the capabilities of a human operator. For example, Strela MANPADS (SA-7) and Eagle (SA-16 / 18) are capable of hitting targets for 5 km, but as a rule they are used only at a distance of 1.5-2 km, when the operator can confidently determine the target and has time to perform the pre-launch preparation. Red Sky provides detection and identification of targets at the effective range of the missile. The system is designed to integrate with various types of missile systems, including American (Stinger) and Russian (Strela, Igla, SA-7, 14, 16, 18, etc.) and their copies produced in many countries (Poland, China etc.). The system allows the use of these missiles and under adverse weather conditions, as well as in conditions of limited visibility, for example, in mountainous areas or urban development conditions.



Using an infrared scanner (Infra-Red Scanner, IRS), Red Sky can automatically detect and track multiple targets, while a separate on-board infrared forward viewing system (FLIR) located on the launcher and tracking module captures the selected targets. The command module as well as the control and communication modules are located in a lightweight mobile system. This compact system is designed to be used by just one operator, deployed with two more people. The system can be transported by helicopters and light ground vehicles.



The infrared scanner was developed by Controp, an Israeli company, equipped with a new Fox front-view infrared system. This system uses two fields of view - a wide field of view (WFOV) camera that provides continuous, passive day / night wide coverage, allowing you to detect targets at a distance of 15 km. The infrared front view system provides the operator with a real-time panoramic view of the protected hemisphere. Separate images generated by a panoramic view are processed in real time, ensuring target detection and tracking. This information is displayed to the operator as an initial situational picture. The command, control and communications unit is based on a robust PC that processes and displays incoming video signals to automatically detect and hit air targets. After selecting a target, the launcher automatically rotates in its direction, where the on-board infrared front-view system captures the target in a wide field of view. The operator can use a narrow viewing angle to identify the target and accurately measure the distance to the target using a laser rangefinder. These systems allow the operator to effectively capture a target at a maximum missile range.



IMI developed the Red Sky system in response to specific customer requirements, integrating battle-proven systems, such as Stinger or Strela missiles, PC-protected systems and infrared front vision systems and tripods developed by Controp Precision Technology.

Брошюра
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sergh
    -5
    April 9 2012 08: 18
    Here are the infections, like monkeys and these there too, well, well, I believed it, they themselves, like, developed it. They rested and shoved their little bit, all things.
    1. ab
      ab
      +8
      April 9 2012 08: 33
      Quote: Sergh
      Here are the infections, like monkeys and these there too, well, well, I believed it, they themselves, like, developed it. They rested and shoved their little bit, all things.

      You yourself can have no doubt. Of course, I understand on this site you can earn marshal's epaulettes exclusively barking towards the Americans, and not understanding the weapons systems or at least the capabilities of the producing countries. wassat
      1. Vadim555
        +6
        April 9 2012 11: 10
        Quote: ab
        ab (2) Today, 08:33 1 Quote: Sergh
        Here are the infections, like monkeys and these there too, well, well, I believed it, they themselves, like, developed it. They rested and shoved their little bit, all things.

        You can not doubt it yourself .


        integrating battle-proven systems like Stinger or Arrow missiles
      2. Igorboss16
        +3
        April 9 2012 14: 18
        here everyone has their own opinion on this matter and if my opinion coincides then I support the comment, this is everyone’s personal opinion and it must be respected and analyzed
      3. Odinplys
        0
        April 10 2012 03: 45
        Quote: ab
        You yourself can have no doubt. Of course, I understand on this site you can earn marshal's epaulettes exclusively barking towards the Americans, and not understanding the weapons systems or at least the capabilities of the producing countries.


        Apart from the remote control system, nothing new ...
        And our "Arrow" ... just a song ...
    2. Dimon
      -7
      April 9 2012 12: 30
      hear, monkey, who else is rushing ... :)))
    3. wars1991
      0
      April 10 2012 20: 14
      The article does not say that the Stinger or the needle can be used as an option. There is a purely Israeli Gil rocket ...
  2. +5
    April 9 2012 08: 58
    They rested and shoved their little bit, all things.

    Accusing anyone of plagiarism is necessary to provide evidence. And of course you can easily prove it?
  3. Olegovich
    +7
    April 9 2012 09: 23
    In principle, they cleverly acted: recognizing the advantages of the stinger and arrow, they improved functionality. They removed the shortcomings of human vision, added electronic, thus adding in range. Good practice, especially can be tested in practice.
    1. +3
      April 9 2012 09: 36
      rocket versatility is good
    2. 755962
      +2
      April 9 2012 12: 46
      Quote: Olegych
      cleverly acted

      Correctly analyzed previous experience in combat use.
  4. +1
    April 9 2012 09: 33
    It’s a good idea to expand the capabilities of MANPADS. But the complex will become heavier and less mobile.
    1. +3
      April 9 2012 09: 55
      I agree that the mobility of the complex is much less than just MANPADS. But as I understand it, they did not set themselves such a task. The result was a stationary air defense system for the poor.
  5. 0
    April 9 2012 09: 52
    As far as I know, there is no friend or foe identification system on the IFC yet ... this is the first problem .... The portable anti-aircraft system ... in this case it is no longer portable ... the second ... I understand this is all against missiles " Khazbolakh ".... if the launch is massive ... then what ... and probably just for this, it would be necessary to provide for the possibility of combining into a system and distributing goals ... And for this it is probably a good thing ... put it in the yard schools ... and don't bother ... plus ...
  6. Railways
    +3
    April 9 2012 10: 02
    We have a complex "Sagittarius", it seems, the idea is many times better.
    1. +3
      April 9 2012 10: 05
      We have a complex "Sagittarius", it seems, the idea is many times better.

      I will not deign you much effort to lay out the performance characteristics of Sagittarius for comparison, otherwise I could not find it.
      "Strelets", a set of control equipment and starting modules
      1. Railways
        0
        April 9 2012 10: 24
        I don’t know, but our complex is already successfully entering the troops, which means definitely better than the Israeli "SAM".
        1. +7
          April 9 2012 10: 31
          I don’t know, but our complex is already successfully entering the troops, which means definitely better than the Israeli "SAM".

          Where is the information that he
          a) enters the troops
          b) successfully
          1. Railways
            +2
            April 9 2012 10: 37
            Here is the performance characteristics ("Needle" + "Sagittarius")
            Key Features:
            Number of Launchers
            carrier modules / rockets
            up to 4 / 8
            Reaction time (minimum
            time from the moment of inclusion
            rockets before launch), with
            6,5
            Maximum time
            set aside for aiming,
            с
            to 60
            Number of rocket starts
            on one start module
            to 4
            Shooting mode
            single, salvo two
            missiles from different sides
            Equipment time
            (demolition) module
            one person, min
            no more 4
            Curb Weight
            starting module, kg
            72
            Mass of control equipment,
            kg
            no more 24
            1. +4
              April 9 2012 10: 46
              This data was in my link.
              I am interested in the range of target detection, the number of targets followed, calculation ...
              1. -5
                April 9 2012 11: 50
                Professor, I suspected you for a long time of working for the Mossad ... do you sincerely think that this data is publicly available ... although you can understand ... the attempt is not a drink ... said comrade Beria ...
                1. +8
                  April 9 2012 11: 58
                  You see, I suspect that Mossad knows all this without me, however, in order to assert that a particular complex is better at times it is necessary to compare the corresponding performance characteristics. The Israelis publish the detection range of their complex.

                  By the way, Sagittarius will be presented in India. So we will soon learn about the range without Mossad. wink
                  1. -3
                    April 9 2012 12: 37
                    Okay Prof. bash on bash ... I will shoot you, and you give me the name of the second ... minus two ...
                    1. +6
                      April 9 2012 12: 47
                      1. -3
                        April 9 2012 20: 13
                        yes there are many of you here .... it’s better so than I hope the Stockholm Syndrome no one suffers here ...
  7. Railways
    +1
    April 9 2012 10: 46
    Professor,
    http://www.1tv.ru/news/social/201768
    Well, if you don’t trust the Russian media, look on Youtube
    1. +1
      April 9 2012 10: 52
      I trust the media, but I check. The link you cited refers to the "Strelets" intelligence, control and communications complex.
      With the help of the "Strelets" intelligence, control and communications complex, the commander monitors the progress of the battle online. This development has recently entered the troops of the Southern Military District. The personnel is studying the novelty in the field. All the necessary data is sent to a small screen via satellite.
      "Here I can already fully see my subordinates. The state of health, they can send their coordinates, the state of the battle, photographs, videos," said the commander of the reconnaissance company squad Denis Pastorov.


      And we are with you about the "Strelets" air defense system.
      1. Railways
        +1
        April 9 2012 11: 01
        Hmm, what kind of SAM "STRELETS" are we talking about ?? I was talking about the "Strelets" complex
        1. +2
          April 9 2012 11: 04
          So I spread to you and the link however: fellow
          "Strelets", a set of control equipment and starting modules

          The set of control equipment and launch modules (AUMP) "Strelets" (hereinafter the set or AUMP "Strelets") is intended for remote automated single sequential (from 2 to 8 missiles) or salvo (two missiles from different modules) launch of Igla-type MANPADS and their foreign counterparts installed on land, sea and air carriers.
  8. Railways
    0
    April 9 2012 11: 23
    ProfessorWell, right, our complex can be part of the system as well as a single launcher. That is, a single information network is being created over the battlefield. Where with the help of the "Strelets" complex, all types of troops can be united for successful interaction. Haven't you guessed yourself?
    1. +4
      April 9 2012 11: 43
      You yourself did not guess?


      Of course I guessed wink but it seems to me we are talking about two different complexes.
      The first SAM "Strelets" is intended for remote automated single sequential or salvo launch of Igla-type MANPADS missiles and their foreign counterparts installed on land, sea and air carriers.
      The second is the "Strelets" reconnaissance, command and communications complex, where the commander monitors the progress of the combined arms battle online and where all the necessary data, including the health status, coordinates of the fighters, the state of the battle, photographs, video, are sent to a small screen via satellite communication.

      Well, what for the calculation of air defense to know the state of health and the coordinates of the soldiers of the infantry platoon?

      Do not rake everything together.
  9. +3
    April 9 2012 12: 50
    Um, why compare different complexes?
    In our doctrine of military air defense, such a complex is not needed.
    And the good fellows created anti-aircraft defense for popuasii Schaub was like everyone else and do not bother with the radar
    well done that sawed off 2 types of missiles.
    1. 0
      April 9 2012 13: 11
      It’s true that they are fighting terrorists there ... with armed improvised missiles ... and our enemy will be more serious .... plus ...
      1. +1
        April 9 2012 13: 22
        they have it from the Kassams "Iron Dome" is for export. There are no consumers of such weapons in Israel.
    2. FROST
      -1
      April 10 2012 15: 37
      And the good fellows created anti-aircraft defense for popuasii Schaub was like everyone else and do not bother with the radar
      well done that sawed off 2 types of missiles.


      It is strange, therefore, you also attribute the army of the Russian Federation to popuasii? After all, she also has a MANPADS in service. Each combat system has its own niche. MANPADS are only part of the layered air defense system.
      1. Zynaps
        -1
        April 10 2012 18: 06
        you first understand that there are MANPADS. because the Israeli complex is not MANPADS at all.
        1. FROST
          -1
          April 10 2012 19: 49
          you first understand that there are MANPADS. because the Israeli complex is not MANPADS at all.


          Yes you are just a lieutenant-evidence wink
  10. Railways
    +1
    April 9 2012 14: 15
    ProfessorThey are worried about the air situation, in fact, KRUS allows you to receive data to the headquarters and redirect their air defense, well, or directly. That is, air defense or MANPADS systems with tablets will receive information about approaching aircraft, UAVs, etc.
    Step to ASUV.
    1. +2
      April 9 2012 14: 28
      I remain in my opinion that these are two different systems, but still
      complex "Sagittarius" like, according to the idea is many times better

      It will not deign you much effort to lay out the performance characteristics of the Sagittarius air defense system for comparison
      What is he in times it is better? TTX? So to say apples with apples ... wink
      1. beard999
        +3
        April 9 2012 14: 44
        Here are links to various Russian launchers, automated process control systems, etc. Including a link to "Sagittarius", from the manufacturer.
        OPU "Dzhigit"
        http://www.kbm.ru/production/pzrk/PUPZRK/32.html
        KAUPM "Sagittarius"
        http://kbm.ru/production/pzrk/PUPZRK/33.html
        TU "Komar"
        http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/igla_c/komar.shtml
        ASUO MANPADS "Helmet"
        http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/pzrk_dp_shlem.html
        KSA "Barnaul-T"
        http://russianarms.mybb.ru/viewtopic.php?id=701
        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltvBu-tIBIQ
        ACS 9S482M7
        http://www.penza-radiozavod.ru/catpv.114.htm
        SOSN 9S520
        http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/pzrk_dp_9s520.html
        Portable electronic tablet 1L110-1
        http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/pzrk_dp_1l110-1.html
        Portable electronic tablet 1L15-1
        http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/pzrk_dp_1l15-1.html
        1. +3
          April 9 2012 16: 40
          The third time I look, it does not work "much better." Do you see something that I see?

          1. +2
            April 9 2012 17: 02
            it is interesting and if MANPADS are tied actively to the automated control system. THAT you can arrange a good landing on a riffraff. Cheap and cheerful.
          2. beard999
            +1
            April 9 2012 19: 31
            Quote: professor
            You see something i see

            I believe that yes, I see. The thing is that you are comparing the "Sagittarius", which is a kit for firing missiles from the MANPADS and ECO of the Israeli Israeli air defense system. But "Sagittarius" can be integrated with any SU http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/zrk_md-ps.html. Take for example the Russian OEC Phoenix http://www.rusarmy.com/pvo/pvo_vsk/rls_fenix.html or here http://www.mid.ru/ns-dipecon.nsf/265be1e81843554743256a0c003fb781/43256a0c0033bf
            7a43256d75002829d6? OpenDocument.
            So compare with this. At the same time, Sagittarius is a development of the beginning of the 90s, and the Phoenix IES of the end of the 90s. I mean, in general, the Israeli Red Sky 2 air defense system is nothing unusual. In my opinion, the equipment of the OPU "Dzhigit" ASUO "Helmet" looks much more preferable. On the other hand, as I understand it, the RF Ministry of Defense, in these developments, has near-zero interest. In addition to “Willow” with a new TPV sight, complete with Barnaul-T, they do not need anything else. The rest is for export only.
            1. 0
              April 9 2012 19: 49
              Just Sagittarius I did not compare as you might have noticed. I do not claim that Red Sky 2 is a unique complex, although there was information that it can work fully automatically.

              I see about Phoenix, thanks.
  11. jenifer
    +2
    April 9 2012 18: 38
    But the wife with an old husband - That ivy hanging on the branches. When the spreading maple tree He embraces both the trunk and the crown, He is young and fresh, and the maple tree is poached. Lope de Vega
  12. 0
    April 9 2012 20: 16
    then someone will then present the received data ... describe how he sucked from patrols ... under the barbed wire ... he will receive a medal ...
  13. Analyst
    +1
    April 9 2012 21: 44
    Our complex is better.

    http://www.ria.ru/tv_defense_safety/20120223/565543938.html
  14. jenifer
    0
    7 June 2012 16: 23
    Do not live in a country that no one rules, many rule, a woman rules, or a child rules.