In Dagestan, during the special operation, three militants were destroyed

45
Three militants, previously blocked in the house in the Dagestan village of Gubden, were destroyed during a special operation, reports TASS.



In the course of the counterterrorist operation in Dagestan, three thugs were neutralized,
said today in the information center of the National Anti-Terrorism Committee (NAC).

A little earlier, an agency source in law enforcement agencies announced the completion of the active phase of the operation.

During the active phase of the special operation, several people resisted from the house cordoned off by the security forces. They are destroyed
said the source.

According to him, the identity of one of the militants has already been established - he was a member of the "Gubden" group, a native of Dagestan, and "is on the federal wanted list in the case of participation in an illegal armed group."

The CTO regime was introduced in the village of Gubden, Karabudakhkentsky district of Dagestan in 15: 45 Moscow time Saturday. On Sunday morning, the NAC information center reported that militants who were blockaded in a private house engaged in a clash with law enforcement officers.
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    17 December 2017 10: 41
    ... guys from the special forces are "cutting" the bandyug staffing ...
    1. +7
      17 December 2017 10: 51
      Hi friend! hi The list is still far from the end, but Moscow was not immediately built. wink
      1. +2
        17 December 2017 10: 53
        Hello old man! hi ... of course it's hard, but you have to go to zero ... wink
        1. +5
          17 December 2017 10: 54
          And no one says that it is not necessary, except for the barmaley themselves and their "breadwinners." bully
    2. +2
      17 December 2017 10: 51
      The Caspian flotilla is being transferred there, so there is only more work to be done.
    3. +2
      17 December 2017 10: 57
      Tenacious bastards .. We work men!
      Russian evil now and will be wet without any introduction!
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 11: 13
        I suggest they give up and lay down their arms. but they are defective products of their parents and sent to the scrap
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 11: 53
          they are offered *

          Well, before the start of neutralization. They can even connect old people to this. Parents. Wives

          I saw a chronicle, negotiations went on for a couple of hours. The chief on the aul talked with another. Near father stood. As a result, the wife and children left the house and had to level the house out of bumblebees.

          Someone surrenders. On whom there is no blood. And who is tied - that in the last battle.
        2. 0
          17 December 2017 13: 15
          Quote: c-Petrov
          I suggest they give up and lay down their arms. but they are defective products of their parents and sent to the scrap

          These stupid rams .... Water them right away.
          They take revenge for ours and do it right! We all remember ..
  2. +1
    17 December 2017 10: 45
    One two Three,
    1. 0
      17 December 2017 11: 59
      Quote: bald
      One two Three,

      Heap gone Yes Yesterday in the KBR they shot one and they look for wounded animals.
  3. +4
    17 December 2017 10: 48
    three more multiplied by zero. perfectly. on earth it has become cleaner
  4. +2
    17 December 2017 10: 52
    This suggests that there are not too many "animals", and they are effectively neutralized, and that the FSB intelligence network is deployed and works efficiently ...
    1. +1
      17 December 2017 11: 03
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      and they are effectively neutralized,

      Yes, almost every day they report neutralization. and at the preparation stage
  5. 0
    17 December 2017 10: 53
    Honestly, these are the problems of the federals, but not of our faiths.
  6. +4
    17 December 2017 10: 56
    Bandits breed like green flies on the dermis. Already how much they lied, and the hunters for leaving in another world do not end there. Good job, commandos!
  7. +2
    17 December 2017 11: 00
    They can be shot forever, but this will not solve the problem. While there is serious funding from abroad, mercenaries from Arab countries travel, youth are recruited in mosques and through the network, Russia will not be able to defeat terror. Why was there no organized terrorist underground in the USSR, but there were only isolated episodes? All citizens loved the Soviet regime and believed in the leading role of the CPSU, which leads us to a bright communist future? The answer is simple - the USSR had a powerful repressive apparatus in the person of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the KGB, there were informants among the population, and most importantly, the elite did not look to the west. If the monarchies of the Persian Gulf or Britain would try to finance terrorism in our 70s, then the Soviet Union would be guaranteed to answer them symmetrically or even start a war with them with the wrong hands. Today, Russia is not respected and not afraid of anywhere, because its elite looks into the mouth of the "international community." If we responded to each terrorist attack with even more bloody action, the problem would quickly disappear. If the special services of CA or Qatar blew up our plane over the Sinai, then bring down their plane over the Atlantic!
    1. +1
      17 December 2017 11: 14
      Why was there no organized terrorist underground in the USSR, but there were only isolated episodes?


      in the USSR did not show much. And that was right. It was possible to hide the riot in the military unit with a black call and I think a lot of other things that went under the neck

      If the monarchies of the Persian Gulf or Britain would try to finance terrorism in our 70s, then the Soviet Union would be guaranteed to answer them symmetrically or even start a war with them with the wrong hands.


      and in the Republic of Ingushetia it was in the Union and will always be, as long as there is Britain and its interests. The Caucasus they consider their interests. And in Afghanistan, the USSR knew who was sponsoring whom. The USSR knew about Bandera and about the fact that they settled in the USA and Canada

      If we responded to every terrorist attack with even more bloody action among them, then


      then hell would come on this earth. There must always be someone sensible
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 11: 53
        1. A lot of things were hidden in the USSR, but the guilty ones always carried well-deserved punishment, often in the form of capital punishment.
        2. There was a civil war in Afghanistan, in which the USSR helped one of the parties. Afghanistan was an ally, but was not part of our country, and the Caucasus is included. Terrorism in the Caucasus is an act of aggression of foreign powers against Russia, and in Afghanistan it is a war of superpowers by the hands of Aboriginal people, who do not give a damn to all interested parties.
        3. If each time you substitute your cheeks under attack, the face will swell. The principle of non-resistance to evil by violence only incites opponents to increasingly vile provocations, but a tough response scares them.
    2. +1
      17 December 2017 11: 15
      1. The number of today's Rosguards / FSO / FSB / MVD / etc is many times greater than this notorious "repressive apparatus of the USSR."
      2. To shoot down Egyptian / Saudi / Qatari passenger planes over the Atlantic in response to a terrorist attack over the Sinai can only offer a very mentally ill person.
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 12: 00
        1. The effectiveness of the intelligence services has decreased, because terrorists use encrypted communications, and the country's borders are open to all kinds of rabble.
        2. The destruction of the enemy population during the operation of retaliation is quite acceptable. If a foreign state kills our citizens without declaring war, then why should we restrain ourselves in the response measures used? War is not a duel of knights to work in white gloves.
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 12: 15
          Quote: Krasnyiy komissar
          Destruction of the enemy population during the operation of retaliation is quite acceptable. If a foreign state kills our citizens without declaring war, then why should we restrain ourselves in the response measures used. War is not a duel of knights to work in white gloves.

          We are not at war with Egypt, or with Qatar, or with the KSA. Therefore, your thesis that “war is not a duel of knights” is devoid of any meaning in the context of this conversation. Not to mention that you yourself write: "a foreign state kills our citizens without declaring war." You should decide: is there a war or not a war. The assessment of the moral and legal component of your proposal for cutting foreign passenger aircraft directly depends on this. I mean, in the first case (if the war takes place to be officially) - this is barbarism and war crime, and in the second case (if there is no war) - banal and vulgar terrorism. As you can see, the difference is significant))
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 13: 13
            If our special services become aware that a terrorist is not a lone fanatic, but a group led by a curator from the special services of another state, then this state must be answered with the same coin, otherwise nothing. Egypt was not interested in destroying our tourists for obvious reasons, but the special services of the SA, Qatar or Turkey could very well have decided on this. In the fall of the 15th, we began an operation in Syria - we got an A321 blown up over Sinai and “hit back” from the Turks. Coincidence? I don’t think so ...
            The owners of the IG thus wanted to set up a society in Russia against the country's participation in the Syrian campaign. Then the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the SA flew to Moscow and tried to put pressure on the GDP, but was sent to hell.
            1. 0
              17 December 2017 13: 25
              Sleep, eccentric, do you read what you write? But you yourself are a ready terrorist. Tomorrow they will call you into the office, show the red crust and say that you need to mine the Aeroflot plane - you yourself will run to ruin people without trial. Explains to you that it’s not our peaceful people who fly there, but "a group of persons responsible for the theft of our native stocks." You beat them with a clear conscience.

              You need to think. And be kinder. Revenge for loss is a personal matter for every person. But the state cannot afford this. Otherwise, it turns ... into our "friends" ...
              1. 0
                17 December 2017 14: 54
                Every time we showed generosity and mercy to our enemies, we washed ourselves with blood. If a war of extermination is waged against the Motherland, then one must not bury his head in the sand like an ostrich, but beat the enemy with all his might. If the little shaves hide the terrorist Akhmed Zakayev (he is still alive, unfortunately), and the Qatar ruler takes under protection Wahhab Zelimkhan Yandarbiyev (he’s already dead!), Then these states directly support the terror on the territory of the Russian Federation. Why don't we support the IRA with weapons and instructors, for example? Let the Irish kill the dignitaries for another hundred years, and we will watch the performance. We will call this the people's liberation movement from British occupation. The little shavens called the terrorists who captured the Nord Ost rebels ...
                This "rebel" now under the protection of the Mi-6 lives in London
            2. 0
              17 December 2017 13: 32
              You remind me of your rhetoric General Franz von Rock from correspondence with Manstein regarding methods and means of combating partisans through repression of the civilian population))
              1. +1
                17 December 2017 15: 17
                regarding methods and means of combating partisans through repression of civilians

                Civilians have nothing to do with it. As I understand it, we are talking about the wider use of special services abroad. Of course, it is not necessary to shoot down another civilian liner in retaliation. But it is necessary to destroy the organizers of terrorist attacks and financial sponsors. There is not much information about this, but everyone is well aware that Israel is destroying terrorists regardless of their location. Under the USSR, when embassy employees were abducted in Lebanon, the head of the abduction was planted by the head of his comrade, our employees were released. So, the Red Commissioner is right in some ways.
                1. 0
                  17 December 2017 15: 36
                  Listen, no one is arguing about the need to increase the effectiveness of counterterrorism by the special services.
                  But the character suggests massively killing civilians as a warning, which of course is an absolute clinic.
  8. +1
    17 December 2017 11: 14
    In Dagestan, during the special operation, three militants were destroyed
    And yesterday there was an article called:
    "The Palestinian massacre: 4 dead, about 900 wounded"
    That is, if 4 fighters were eliminated in Dagestan, and three would be called an article "Dagestan massacre: 4 dead"? I got it. The line passes between 3 and 4 fighters. wink
    1. +2
      17 December 2017 11: 21
      Believe me, if 900 people in the aul were to suffer in a special operation in Dagestan, you would be the first, and the Romanians and Bulgarians and others who hang out on this site joyfully sucked this news here and talked about repressive, not up-to-date Russia
      1. 0
        17 December 2017 11: 37
        Quote: c-Petrov
        Believe me, if 900 people in the aul were to suffer in a special operation in Dagestan, you would be the first, and the Romanians and Bulgarians and others who hang out on this site joyfully sucked this news here and talked about repressive, not up-to-date Russia

        In Dagestan, more than 900 people were affected.

        Quote: Egorovich
        This is another comparison of horseradish with a finger. Which of the four dead and nine hundred wounded Palestinians was armed with firearms or grenades?

        And which of the three militants in Dagestan was armed?
        1. +1
          17 December 2017 11: 39
          In Dagestan, more than 900 people were affected.


          we talk about one day Professor (week)

          And which of the three militants in Dagestan was armed?


          no need to pretend to be a horned forest dweller. Professor, don’t upset me
          1. 0
            17 December 2017 12: 17
            Quote: s-t Petrov
            In Dagestan, more than 900 people were affected.
            we talk about one day Professor (week)

            900 Fylystyns were also not injured in a day or even a week.

            Quote: s-t Petrov
            no need to pretend to be a horned forest dweller. Professor, don’t upset me

            I won’t pretend to be anyone when I show the link wherever your security officials, prosecutor’s office or court say: “Our security officials were mistaken and destroyed unarmed / threw weapons. Perpetrators punished. "
    2. +1
      17 December 2017 11: 33
      This is another comparison of horseradish with a finger. Which of the four dead and nine hundred wounded Palestinians was armed with firearms or grenades?
    3. 0
      17 December 2017 12: 06
      Quote: professor
      I got it. The line passes between 3 and 4 fighters

      No professor, you misunderstood. In your case, it is Israel and the United States that are terrorists against the Palestinians. You provoked them to aggression. In our case, no one provoked them, the destroyed ones are voluntary seekers of adventure on their ass, for which they suffered.
  9. +1
    17 December 2017 11: 15
    Just killing during special operations - this does not stop them. It would be more effective if everyone who “goes into the forest” understands that his soul will meet with Allah, his ancestral home with a bulldozer, and his family will move to special settlements in Siberia.
    1. 0
      17 December 2017 11: 29
      Quote: samarin1969
      Just killing during special operations - this does not stop them. It would be more effective if everyone who “goes into the forest” understands that his soul will meet with Allah, his ancestral home with a bulldozer, and his family will move to special settlements in Siberia.

      But what if relatives live in Grozny with a conditional terrorist? Will Grozny take it again? Now bulldozed? )))
      PS Do not read the Israeli forums - we are not in Jerusalem, but in Dagestan, Hamas is not operating at all.
      1. +1
        17 December 2017 11: 32
        in Chechnya (only in Chechnya), forest deer are being driven at home. Directly with a bulldozer, right everything is as it should be. Right-wingers wrote about this more than one page of yellow paper.

        And it’s very difficult for the family to live in their settlement later. As the Enemy of the People in the USSR
        1. 0
          17 December 2017 11: 46
          Yes, you quit! Once they burned the houses of those radishes, which were lit up in a swoop on Grozny. This is a local showdown. If these terrorists hadn’t attacked Grozny, but, for example, Naryan-Mar, then not a single Czech would tear him from his chair))
          1. +1
            17 December 2017 11: 49
            I do not deny. But I think we just found out only a few cases out of many.

            Nobody wants to let war into their territory. The whole Caucasus should live like that. I think the war they have washed and mines scattered in the mountains and forests.

            Their children die and will die for many more years because of fornication in the heads of conditional parents. The Caucasus will be cleared by several generations (if the next outbreak does not happen)

            The echo of war will constantly hint at an alternative to a peaceful path.

            So I think they’ll still burn the houses there. The disease in one case is not treated.
      2. 0
        17 December 2017 12: 39
        On the one hand, killed souls and cripples of Volgograd, cut throats of our guys in the Caucasus ... On the other hand, they show the parents of terrorists who live in large houses, receive social assistance. On camera, they talk about "good boys" who love music, read "books", pray earnestly ... and then go into the woods. ...
        Sorry, anyone, but I don’t believe their parents or your arguments. ...
        1. +1
          17 December 2017 13: 08
          Let's not be too pathos, huh? I have no moral prejudices against dividing by zero the various dwellings of the entire, as a rule, the numerous relatives of the terrorists and the eviction of these citizens to the expanses of the nuclear testing grounds of Novaya Zemlya. The question is different in the expediency and effectiveness of the application of such measures in our conditions. Look, our sculpted friends from China do this to corrupt officials and their relatives. Maybe, for starters, a run on relatives of Vasilyeva or Zakharchenko? Joke. But seriously, what is good for Jews in Israel does not necessarily suit us in Russia. Our government today will not decide on unpopular measures in the North. Caucasus. Maybe this is justified.
    2. +1
      17 December 2017 13: 23
      The terrorist must be buried in a pigskin in a cattle cemetery, so that his soul goes to a pig paradise. They are afraid to die like that, that's why they need to be punished in this way. One to bury in the carcass of a pig - a hundred bearded men will think and go nuts from such a perspective. The method of Alexei Ermolov showed high efficiency in the Caucasus, as well as the methods of the British in India. We are always afraid to offend someone, that's why we chew snot, and our ancestors were not afraid and ... won.
  10. 0
    17 December 2017 15: 55
    Thank you - this is only pleasing.
  11. +1
    18 December 2017 01: 39
    Where in the photo does a comrade in uniform aim or is this a photo version of the militants?