Military Review

The Ministry of Defense refuted the report on the interception of Russian Su-25

74
The Russian military denied reports of foreign media about the interception in the skies over Syria of two attack aircraft Su-25 VKS by the American F-22 fighter, reports RIA News.




As clarified in the department, the incident occurred on December 13.

From the east bank of the river, an American F-22 fighter approached them (Russian planes). Shooting heat traps, the F-22 interfered with a pair of Russian Su-25,
says release.

After these maneuvers, the Russian Su-22С fighter approached the F-35, “as a result, the American plane was forced to leave the area in a hurry,” the Defense Ministry said.

Earlier, on December 9, the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Konashenkov stated that most of the convergence of Russian and American aircraft in the skies over Syria were associated with attempts by the US Air Force to prevent the destruction of the Islamic State terrorists (the group is banned in Russia).
Photos used:
https://defence.ru
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Frol 7525
    Frol 7525 15 December 2017 08: 06 New
    10
    "After these maneuvers, the Russian Su-22S fighter approached F-35," as a result, the American plane was forced to hastily leave the area, "
    That's all. Uncles train ... And ours, and not ours ... smile
    1. Chertt
      Chertt 15 December 2017 08: 24 New
      +4
      The Ministry of Defense refuted the report on the interception of Russian Su-25
      What have you refuted? What was no interception, attempted interception You better refute fake chemical attacks. Yes, so that everyone believes
      1. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 15 December 2017 09: 13 New
        +1
        as a result, the American plane was forced to hastily leave the area
        jackals .. "and we will go north and wait out the battle" (c)
    2. Sergey-svs
      Sergey-svs 15 December 2017 08: 28 New
      17
      Quote: Frol 7525
      That's all. Uncles train ... And ours, and not ours ...

      “The Russian Su-10S fighter, which performed air cover tasks at an altitude of 000 meters, quickly approached the F-35 from the rear hemisphere, after which the American fighter left the area," the Russian Ministry of Defense specified ... good

      Well, now everything at once - fell into place. yes The F-22 pilot simply collapsed from “surprise” when our SU-35 was attached to its rear hemisphere and therefore humbled away from sin. Indeed, from the "not tolerant" Russian everything can be expected! laughing
      1. askme
        askme 15 December 2017 08: 35 New
        11
        Well, it turned out that Our Su-35S is stronger than reptiles. Well done guys, they drive chickens well!))
        1. igorka357
          igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 49 New
          +1
          It is possible in close combat, but the raptor is not sharpened under it, most likely the pilot got carried away like a cat with a mouse .. and didn’t notice how the dog crept in! In a real battle for air supremacy, the raptor will not climb into close combat, and will even avoid the average distance ..a we are unfortunately inferior to long-range explosive missiles, and not only to them !!! They have aviation many times stronger, but nothing .. we somehow polished the air defense very well, and if anything .. then it is to our flyers to help!
          1. NEXUS
            NEXUS 15 December 2017 18: 50 New
            +5
            Quote: igorka357
            but the raptor is not sharpened under it,

            A raptor is a fighter for gaining dominance in the air, by definition, and under the "dog dump" is also imprisoned ... just the SU-35C in the short range is stupidly better, due to its better super maneuverability and arsenal.
            Quote: igorka357
            unfortunately, we are inferior to long-range explosive missiles, and not only in them !!

            They themselves understood what they scratched? The fact that mattresses have long-range missiles is considered to be medium-range missiles. Mattresses do not have a rocket like our RVV-DB and there is no rocket like a R-37. The mattresses have an AIM-152 AAAM rocket that flies 270 km. And our R-37 flies 300 km.
            1. igorka357
              igorka357 16 December 2017 04: 22 New
              0
              I realized that I scratched, although not a pro in aviation, but here you are .. laughing if our Sukhoi is stupidly better, then it’s imprisoned under a “dump”, if a raptor is worse it means it’s worse imprisoned, it’s firstly! Secondly, Avax and A-50 will be shot down first of all, pilots of two fighters will have to rely only on their radars. . make your own conclusions, or tell me .. it’s only from your three hundred if the raptor detects ours with more than five hundred kilometers, and ours only four hundred, and Sukhoi can detect an object with such an EPR that the raptor does not have .. Damn, yes even our specialists in aviation recognize that our radars are worse .. why should I argue with you! Near air battles will be very rare in the age of our technology! It would be better, of course, that they would not exist at all!
              1. NEXUS
                NEXUS 16 December 2017 13: 04 New
                +4
                Quote: igorka357
                Secondly, the Avaxs and A-50s will be shot down first, the pilots of the two fighters will have to rely only on their radars ..

                Hmm ... a bad case. The 35th radar is not much inferior to the pangolin radar. Despite the fact that our fighter is able to see in the IR range, but the Raptor does not have such an opportunity. And therefore, all its stealth technology is not at all in the box office.
                Despite the fact that Avax and the A-50 still need to be shot down, the matter is very laborious.
                Quote: igorka357
                Near air battles will be very rare in the age of our technology!

                Well, yes ... in Syria, the “communication” of our air forces with the coalition air force more often took place at close range.
                1. igorka357
                  igorka357 17 December 2017 08: 14 New
                  0
                  It is a difficult case to compare the local conflict, where the Russian Federation and the United States do not officially conflict, and there are no air battles between the countries, and the global conflict of the two countries using the entire spectrum of weapons. I don’t even want to argue with you! inferior to .. this is for specialists from aviators .. they will explain to you from what distance our Sukhoi will see the raptor with its scanty EPR.
          2. Sergey-svs
            Sergey-svs 16 December 2017 08: 17 New
            +1
            Tovarich, I don’t need to tap into me, I just don’t pay attention to the indescribable illiterate comments of people who are positive about liberalism and with obvious admiration for everything American: weapons, army, democracy, etc. (as evidenced by most of your comments). It can be seen that you were really hurt by the living, as I humiliated the Amerovsky pilot, describing his unprofessional illiteracy and self-confidence. lol And now, regarding the bubuini you wrote:
            Quote: igorka357
            .... Do you think a normal Russian man will look into the back hemisphere of their pilot, and that’s pure homosexual .... what exactly he hinted at when he said about the "crap US pilots" and "intolerant Russians" attached to the back hemisphere .... And yes I'm not special in aviation, but even I ... I know that the term rear hemisphere is used very much where ...

            Comrade, no offense, but apparently you are a hidden homosexual, you have some unhealthy craving to see the male anus in everything and hints of copulation with him. fool No wonder the proverb apparently says: "Whoever hurts something, he says that." You should have consulted a doctor, although in America you adore, it has long been considered the norm and one of the values ​​of the Western way of life. yes
            P.S. And for the general development, in the West, Russians, for our “heterosexuality” are called precisely - “NOT TOLERANT AND CRAZY”! good
            Good luck! hi And I will not answer more to your sexually unsatisfied nonsense - it's a pity to waste my time on this. yes
            1. igorka357
              igorka357 17 December 2017 08: 18 New
              0
              Before writing about my love for America, I would read my remarks and comments, I have never been noticed in love for Americans .. never .. laughing ! They’re crazy about screaming that everything’s bullshit and everything’s cool! These Americans bend half of the world with their bullshit .. and sell their bullshit for 250 lard a year, and we .. don’t want to ask? this is all of Europe, Australia, Japan, Korea .. and we have ... Zimbabwe, Ethiopia, and Malaysia ... Egypt .. Syria ... well, compare ka?
          3. Nikolai Grek
            Nikolai Grek 16 December 2017 20: 32 New
            +3
            Quote: igorka357
            It is possible in close combat, but the raptor is not sharpened under it, most likely the pilot got carried away like a cat with a mouse .. and didn’t notice how the dog crept in! In a real battle for air supremacy, the raptor will not climb into close combat, and will even avoid the average distance ..a we are unfortunately inferior to long-range explosive missiles, and not only to them !!! They have aviation many times stronger, but nothing .. we somehow polished the air defense very well, and if anything .. then it is to our flyers to help!

            If the raptor could not detect the presence of our SU-35 and climbed up to lift up our SU-25, it is possible that neither rockets, nor the short range, nor the longest will help it !!! wink yes laughing laughing laughing
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 45 New
        +1
        And what can you expect from the Russians? Do you think a normal Russian man will look into the back hemisphere of their pilot, is it pure homosexual, or do you think that active homosexuals are normal people? Before you write, look into your bullshit! zones that the one who ... this cock, and the one who this cock, that normal guy ... yes I beg you ... both homosexuals, and active even more! So there is no need to carry nonsense about Russian pilots!
        1. viktorR
          viktorR 15 December 2017 10: 51 New
          +7
          Before commenting, you would have taught a materiel, otherwise it strikes you as far as you are spoiled and not in the subject of military aviation, but in the subject of any prison perversions. The rear hemisphere (ZPS) is an aviation term.
          Fu to be such a pervert.
          1. igorka357
            igorka357 16 December 2017 04: 28 New
            0
            Don’t you really understand Serezha’s promise svs? You’re just going to argue, I’ll conclude a bet with you, we’ll reach out to the author and ask what he hinted at, talking about the addition of “crap US pilots” to the back hemisphere and “not tolerant Russians "... I’m just in shock with you! And yes, I’m not special in aviation, but even I ... know that the term back hemisphere is used a lot where ... damn, I’m willing to be rude!
  2. Dangerous
    Dangerous 15 December 2017 08: 06 New
    +3
    Video to watch ...
    1. askme
      askme 15 December 2017 08: 37 New
      +2
      Litter of pilots from all nozzles at the time of escape from the Su-35S?)) I do not think that the contents of their guts are anything interesting)))
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 50 New
        +5
        The contents of your brains, as well as those .. who thinks that the crew was written off from Donald Cook because of fear ... laughing
        1. Barmal
          Barmal 16 December 2017 14: 14 New
          +1
          They are copied. It did not occur to me to think for dolds of cookies. Let their defense minister think for them. When the Amersam were invested in bulk in the Black Sea, they crap something to show against the Soviet Navy. And when they were already shown in the Russian Federation an indecent gesture from the sky in the form of unpunished spans over the deck, they decided that soon there would be bulk again and there was no time for service. That was written off ashore.
  3. Uncle lee
    Uncle lee 15 December 2017 08: 09 New
    +9
    This news is again and again!
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 15 December 2017 08: 21 New
      +9
      Volodya, hello! hi Securing the material. wink
      1. Uncle lee
        Uncle lee 15 December 2017 08: 32 New
        +6
        Hello max! hi Repetition - the mother of learning good
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 15 December 2017 08: 35 New
          +6
          In-in. In the West they will cross over this topic until they themselves are bored. yes
          1. Uncle lee
            Uncle lee 15 December 2017 08: 37 New
            +7
            Quote: Jedi
            will wash

            Until they learn what to pamper with the Russians, it’s more expensive for themselves!
            1. Jedi
              Jedi 15 December 2017 08: 46 New
              +6
              They have known this for a long time, but they twist everything in their own way, so as not to lose face. lol
              1. novel66
                novel66 15 December 2017 09: 31 New
                +6
                Hello. gentlemen! hi happy. that our lesson was learned, and drying covers its own. and not hanging out do not understand where
                1. Jedi
                  Jedi 15 December 2017 09: 41 New
                  +4
                  And you don’t get sick, Roma! hi Yes, since the Raptors are preventing the Rooks from working, why shouldn't the Su-35s do the same with the Raptors themselves?
                  1. novel66
                    novel66 15 December 2017 09: 42 New
                    +5
                    especially. that my hands itch
                    1. Jedi
                      Jedi 15 December 2017 09: 46 New
                      +5
                      I also have such a suspicion. lol
                2. igorka357
                  igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 52 New
                  0
                  Yeah .. covered, only at different echelons for some reason, the 25th at which echelon worked .. and 35 already on a dozen shoveling .. it was not a cover .. but just help on time!
                  1. In100gram
                    In100gram 15 December 2017 18: 30 New
                    0
                    Quote: igorka357
                    and 35 already on a dozen shurov .. it was not a cover

                    The higher the height, the further you can see. I think the fu-22 is also not easy to make out.
      2. pvv113
        pvv113 15 December 2017 08: 40 New
        +4
        Hi, Max! It’s difficult to fix, because each time the information is presented differently
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 15 December 2017 08: 47 New
          +4
          Volodya, good morning! hi
          Quote: pvv113
          each time the information is presented differently

          I have stated my position on “tricks” above. wink
  4. HEATHER
    HEATHER 15 December 2017 08: 09 New
    +7
    "Sklefasovsky". I DO NOT BELIEVE! Once again, the vomit is poured vile. One of this puts all the points.
    1. igorka357
      igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 53 New
      0
      What's so extreme?
  5. chidoryan
    chidoryan 15 December 2017 08: 10 New
    +6
    MO again a screenshot will lead as irrefutable evidence of the run of two f-22 drying? Shot, I do not believe our MO recently.
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 15 December 2017 08: 24 New
      +9
      Those. you don’t care that it was real, that the MO later posted normal pictures? The main thing is that with screenshots you messed around and now you don’t believe MO? Sorry, but I do not believe you that you believed the MO before that incident.
      1. chidoryan
        chidoryan 15 December 2017 08: 29 New
        +4
        They didn’t "go to bed", they brazenly lied, and they burned stupidly and shamefully. If the Moscow Region is so impudently lying, considering us all, and you, including for the rams, then excuse me, believe in the noodles with the Su-35 yourself.
        1. Muvka
          Muvka 15 December 2017 08: 35 New
          +7
          No, they didn’t lie. An hour later, they posted the normal pictures. So do not lie. But write to your eyes at least ...
          1. chidoryan
            chidoryan 15 December 2017 08: 41 New
            +6
            You will justify any jamb purely from patriotic feelings? that’s really divine ....
            1. Mestny
              Mestny 15 December 2017 09: 22 New
              +6
              Well, it turns out that he is like patriotism - in any situation, to support and justify his country. For teens, this is a discovery.
              1. chidoryan
                chidoryan 15 December 2017 09: 37 New
                +5
                would any German in the 40s tell you so, and what, would he be right? The logic “our people are right only because they are ours” is not logic, it is a flawed worldview of the pack primacy.
            2. Muvka
              Muvka 15 December 2017 09: 45 New
              +4
              What does patriotic feelings have to do with it? I do not care about all these screenshots. What MO was talking about was in reality. This was proved by the pictures, which were posted an hour after the fake ones.
              1. chidoryan
                chidoryan 15 December 2017 09: 50 New
                +7
                And what was there? Photos of some strange column as a "compressed jackal jpeg" ?? Is this type of evidence that states defended the "forbidden"? Are you really such gullible donkeys? And how did they show Putin the video with the Apache, too, forgot? This is shame and shame, shame and shame. And you opened your mouth and rejoice. You drove the dinosaurs, you see. The main news was that the dinosaurs drove the drying out. And infa about the su-35 appeared after, apparently our MO threw this infa in order not to look so liquid. And then it’s one thing for the bearded from a great height to bomb and report on 10005000 destroyed points, and another to face an equal enemy in the sky. So let the video from the su-35 provide, then there will be something to talk about. Just not a screenshot from the game, please. And blurt out something bravura in our time is not to roll bags.
        2. sashok1951.21
          sashok1951.21 15 December 2017 09: 18 New
          +1
          Well, they don’t count me and I don’t count. A ram is one who considers himself a ram.
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 15 December 2017 10: 54 New
        +2
        Everything is correct, having lied once, it loses confidence ... this is actually the truth!
    2. Chertt
      Chertt 15 December 2017 08: 34 New
      +4
      chidoryan You made two mistakes in the phrase "Herzmatic personality"
      1. Mestny
        Mestny 15 December 2017 09: 24 New
        +2
        They still did not pass this word. Or a page from a textbook with the word "charisma" was smoked before they could see it.
        1. kirgiz58
          kirgiz58 15 December 2017 09: 49 New
          +3
          Quote: Mestny
          Or a page from a textbook with the word "charisma" was smoked before they could see it.

          Probably, while he was smoking a page with the word "charisma", he came across a page with the word "sherry". lol
      2. chidoryan
        chidoryan 15 December 2017 10: 52 New
        +2
        Very touched by the care of someone else's typos. This, of course, is the most important thing in life.
    3. Kent0001
      Kent0001 15 December 2017 10: 35 New
      +3
      Yes, do not believe it or not. And if you do not believe our MO, then take an interest in the work of our MO in the barmaley (well, for those who are still alive so far).
      1. chidoryan
        chidoryan 15 December 2017 10: 52 New
        +4
        But where does the barmalei have to do with it?
    4. Nikolai Grek
      Nikolai Grek 16 December 2017 20: 36 New
      +1
      Quote: chidoryan
      MO again a screenshot will lead as irrefutable evidence of the run of two f-22 drying? Shot, I do not believe our MO recently.

      recourse recourse recourse Guided by your logic, all statements of Americans and their henchmen can be put in doubt !!! wink tongue tongue lol lol lol
  6. Black water
    Black water 15 December 2017 08: 10 New
    +4
    Tricky beasts ... and prevented a strike and if it weren’t for the blow due to the interference, he would have fixed f22 with his objective control means ...... or maybe they planned: we missed and they made a video fix. .... dishonestly, and not dumbly to American pilots to participate in such setups ....
    1. Cxnumx
      Cxnumx 15 December 2017 08: 17 New
      +1
      Quote: Black Water
      and not dumb to American pilots to participate in such setups ....

      as a person perhaps, dumbly. but they still have orders.
    2. HEATHER
      HEATHER 15 December 2017 08: 23 New
      +4
      And the F-22 stupidly has no brake pads. It is not provided for by the design. When flying around our 25s, it spread its wings to slow down. It’s hard to hang over low-speed cars. And then the 35th drew!
  7. Fedorov
    Fedorov 15 December 2017 08: 32 New
    +1
    Something I may not understand. It is stated that they fly accompanied by fighters. Or a fake, or a pill must be given in the press service.
    f-22 is unlikely to be 50 km in contact with the Su-30, there "pants" to dry and remember his son in Alabama.
  8. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 15 December 2017 08: 34 New
    +1
    Hmm, interestingly it turns out. F22 made an attempt to intercept at an altitude of 3300, at an altitude of 10000 our SU35 was hanging in cover, and that Amer did not see him, that he allowed him to enter the tail ??? Or are they so confident in their exceptionalism or that something they have with the wrong technique. I’m not special, but I understand that on the radar he should have reflected our SU35.
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 15 December 2017 09: 00 New
      +3
      but I understand that on the radar he should have reflected our SU35. There is passive escort and active. In passive mode, no one sees the attacking fighter. But he sees. It’s impossible to detect. In active, the enemy’s radar is illuminated. The difference is in the detection range.
      1. novel66
        novel66 15 December 2017 09: 34 New
        +6
        as far as I understand - there all the time somewhere Avax hangs out - and he had to see and tell something
    2. tchoni
      tchoni 15 December 2017 09: 23 New
      +6
      Quote: Hariton Laptev
      Hmm, interestingly it turns out. F22 made an attempt to intercept at an altitude of 3300, at an altitude of 10000 our SU35 was hanging in cover, and that Amer did not see him, that he allowed him to enter the tail ??? Or are they so confident in their exceptionalism or that something they have with the wrong technique. I’m not special, but I understand that on the radar he should have reflected our SU35.

      I think that he saw and understood everything. Pay attention to the difference in the content of the messages of our and the bourgeois press. Bourgeois speaks of a PAIR f22 intercepted rook. Ours about ONE f22 trying to prevent. From this we can draw the following conclusion: the provocation was carried out by one f22, and the second covered him. It was interesting for the American to come up and shoot so that drying would not react. Which he did. Drying came up - he left - for it was not possible to aggravate the team.
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 15 December 2017 11: 19 New
        +6
        Most likely your option is the most correct, but go ahead ... prove to stupid people! Since our Moscow Defense Ministry said that one 4 ++ drove two fives out, then it drove out .. laughing
  9. tchoni
    tchoni 15 December 2017 08: 37 New
    +1
    Here again the same question: why did Su 35 NOT PREVENT the dangerous rapprochement of f22 and the wards?
    And what is interception? And interception is a rapprochement on the firing range! And then what was it if not an interception?
  10. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 15 December 2017 09: 30 New
    +2
    Our MO also needs to announce the interception by our Su-35S of the American F-22, which he preferred to quickly retreat ..... and that's it ....
  11. sabakina
    sabakina 15 December 2017 09: 55 New
    +3
    After these maneuvers, the Russian Su-22S fighter approached F-35.

    Maybe all the same flew up?
    1. kirgiz58
      kirgiz58 15 December 2017 10: 09 New
      +2
      Quote: sabakina
      Maybe all the same flew up?

      Came up - the word "wide profile", and came up, and flew up, and swam up. More literate, of course, came closer (closer), but what about the journalists? They would still say to the Mariners "swam", the answer would be the only one .... smile
  12. Pavlovsky
    Pavlovsky 15 December 2017 11: 43 New
    0
    So the American armed formations with minions in Syria are generally not legally located, so that the Syrians can and should be countered, creating a no-fly zone for "cooperation".
  13. Sergey53
    Sergey53 15 December 2017 11: 44 New
    +1
    Really, there is nothing to boast of to mattress covers, so at least they make up a fake. Even Trump confirmed that they have fake media.
  14. Knizhnik
    Knizhnik 15 December 2017 12: 24 New
    +1
    In an interview with CNN, US Air Force Central Command spokesman Lt. Col. Damien Pickart accused Russian pilots of dangerous maneuvers during the incident.

    “One of the Su-25 attack aircraft was flying at a fairly close distance from the F-22A fighter, and he had to perform an aggressive maneuver to avoid a collision in the air,” he said, adding that during the incident, the Russian Su-35 fighter also crossed the airspace above the river, and one of the F-22A fighters pursued it at close range
    It turns out that they also pursued. (inosmi.ru)
    1. chidoryan
      chidoryan 15 December 2017 12: 31 New
      +2
      Well, and who to believe? who drove whom then?
      1. Shahno
        Shahno 15 December 2017 12: 35 New
        +1
        So no one drove anyone. There are a couple of oddities and no more. Why did they allow rapprochement with attack aircraft? What is this escort at an altitude of 10000 m?
  15. Fedya2017
    Fedya2017 15 December 2017 21: 36 New
    +1
    It is no accident that the Americans began to drive a propaganda wave about Russian intruder planes ... It seems that they are going to bring down, following the example of Turkey? We need a reason ... So we drove the wave.
  16. omit
    omit 16 December 2017 11: 27 New
    0
    Get out of the way.