Military Review

Roscosmos called the cause of the accident after launch from the Vostochny cosmodrome

90
The crash of the “Fregat” upper stage (RB) with 19 satellites, launched from the Vostochny cosmodrome Soyuz-2.1b 28 on November 2017, occurred because the control system of the unit calculated the rotation in the wrong direction, the first Deputy Director General of the Roscosmos State Corporation Alexander Ivanov.


Roscosmos called the cause of the accident after launch from the Vostochny cosmodrome


According to him, a special commission completed the work and unequivocally established the cause of the accident. It is associated with the imperfection of the software algorithms of the control system of the Republic of Belarus "Fregat", which first appeared only during this launch. "The control system operation algorithm led to an incorrect determination of the orientation of the upper stage after separation from the carrier rocket with the initial azimuths of the rocket and the block on the launch complex of the Vostochny cosmodrome
- Ivanov announced the official conclusion of the commission.

As a result, the booster after turning away from the third stage of the launch vehicle began to turn in the wrong direction, did not manage to finish the maneuver in 55 seconds, and after turning on the propulsion system, lost orientation and fell, specified Ivanov.

Ivanov noted that all the work carried out at the launch site and the technical complex of the cosmodrome during the preparation for launch could not lead to a similar result, and "no comments were made on the operation of the systems of the cosmodrome Vostochny not detected." Also, the commission did not reveal any comments in the work of the launch vehicle.

The overclocking block itself and its component parts (engines, control system) worked in accordance with a predetermined algorithm, which was laid out in 1998 during the creation of this block
- added Ivanov. He clarified that there were no questions to the flight task, to its compilation also found - “the flight task was formed strictly in accordance with the ballistic data protocol”.

Ivanov noted that such problems with the algorithm, which led to the loss of the "Frigate", "are treated by software methods," reports TASS
Photos used:
TASS, Yuri Smithyuk
90 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Berkut154
    Berkut154 12 December 2017 10: 06 New
    +9
    This is a scribe, comrades. belay
    1. Jedi
      Jedi 12 December 2017 10: 07 New
      +6
      According to him, the special commission completed the work and unequivocally established the cause of the accident. It is associated with the imperfection of the software algorithms of the control system of the Republic of Belarus "Frigate"

      Did US hackers get in? lol
      But seriously, what kind of gouging? Why wasn’t all the software rechecked ten times? Who will be punished? And will it carry at all? In general, there are a lot of questions.
      1. Solomon Kane
        Solomon Kane 12 December 2017 10: 12 New
        +7
        The reason is clear for a long time. It is not clear - who "sat down" for this? Or what administrative sanctions are applied?
        Max! hi My regards! hi
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 12 December 2017 10: 13 New
          +5
          Kostya, hi! hi Here I am about the same. There are a lot of questions, but not very answers. negative
          1. Solomon Kane
            Solomon Kane 12 December 2017 10: 20 New
            +4
            Max! Mass "landings" of system managers will begin - the era of trouble-free launches, military products delivered on time, etc. will begin.
            I read that the GDP plans to introduce a policy of tough struggle against systemic gouges .... God forbid! hi
            1. Jedi
              Jedi 12 December 2017 10: 25 New
              +4
              Quote: Solomon Kane
              I read that the GDP plans to introduce a policy of tough struggle against systemic gouges .... God forbid!

              I agree with you all 200%.
      2. Thrall
        Thrall 12 December 2017 10: 13 New
        +2
        Is the young programmer Vasya Pupkin already fired? smile
        1. Angel_and_Demon
          Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 10: 44 New
          +7
          Quote: Thrall
          Is the young programmer Vasya Pupkin already fired? smile

          and still bereft of premium laughing
      3. aszzz888
        aszzz888 12 December 2017 10: 13 New
        +7
        Jedi Today, 10:07 ... Who will be punished?

        ... I think we should start with a rotting head ...
        1. Sergey-svs
          Sergey-svs 12 December 2017 10: 21 New
          +7
          According to him, the special commission completed the work and unequivocally established the cause of the accident. It is associated with the imperfection of the software algorithms of the control system of the Republic of Belarus "Frigate", which first appeared only during this launch. "The algorithm of the control system led to an incorrect determination of the orientation of the upper stage after separation from the launch vehicle with the initial azimuths of the rocket and the block at the launch complex of the Vostochny launch site - Ivanov announced the commission’s official statement ...

          Handsome! How many beautiful and empty words - at the same time! yes This is the "effective manager" from our government! good But, he could have simply said: "God - gave, God - took! Not guilty WE, he fell! .... Sawing further ... that is, we work, gentlemen!" yes
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 10: 45 New
            +8
            Quote: Sergey-svs
            could just say: "God - gave, God - took!

            brevity is the sister of talent, and he has a brother request
      4. Going
        Going 12 December 2017 10: 13 New
        +4
        “The acceleration unit itself and its components (engines, control system) worked out in accordance with a predetermined algorithm, which was laid back in 1998 when this unit was created
        - added Ivanov.


        Well, what should I call it?
        1. Black water
          Black water 12 December 2017 10: 33 New
          +3
          sloppiness, lack of professionalism .... well, you can still sabotage ..... when outdated data is uploaded to an expensive rocket and then not checked at the final stage ...... it is a space ship that does not forgive mistakes, everything must be worked out and redirected 10 time ... and if it was a lunar expedition with 19 astronauts, then how? ... all involved to remove snow at the cosmodrome ...
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 13 December 2017 14: 47 New
            +2
            Quote: Black Water
            sloppiness, lack of professionalism .... well, you can still sabotage ..... when outdated data is pumped into an expensive rocket

            Here is a similar "start"
        2. BARKHAN
          BARKHAN 12 December 2017 11: 58 New
          +2
          Quote: Going
          Well, what should I call it?

          Criminal negligence. Perpetrated by a group of persons. But was there a preliminary conspiracy ...?
      5. dauria
        dauria 12 December 2017 10: 22 New
        12
        Why wasn’t all the software rechecked ten times?


        . July 21, 1962 from Cape Canaveral, the Atlas launch vehicle carrying the Mariner-1 vehicle, which was supposed to go to Venus, was launched. A few minutes after take-off, the rocket deviated from the course and was blown up for security reasons. Somehow, the hyphen was missing in the reference program, which led to incorrect rocket control - leaving to the left and lowering the nose. The hyphen was also skipped during the previous successful launches of Atlas, but this part of the program was not used, because there was no rupture of radio communications.

        For those who make the program, "the eye is blurred", it is difficult to double-check, an error is skipped - brains are on the same track. And the one who checks it is easier for him to write his own version than to catch fleas. After all, errors in the program are also logical, and it is much more difficult to catch them.
        1. sxfRipper
          sxfRipper 12 December 2017 10: 29 New
          +2
          A hyphen is missing ... I don’t know how it was in 1962, and now the compiler would simply give an error in such-and-such module on such-and-such line - and EVERYTHING!
          1. dauria
            dauria 12 December 2017 10: 44 New
            +9
            and now the compiler would just throw an error


            And if there is no syntax error, there are no missing labels, in general there are no errors from the point of view of the compiler, and indeed all the hardware? And does it clearly do what they wrote to him? But the person himself simply did not see that it was possible to get into some ring of the program with other parameters? And when debugging, everything works until that very rare event occurs.
        2. region58
          region58 12 December 2017 10: 47 New
          +4
          A more recent case: on the NASA Mars Climate Orbiter, one system measured momentum in feet per second, and the other in newtons per second. As a result, the station burned out in the atmosphere of Mars
        3. Igor V
          Igor V 12 December 2017 11: 16 New
          +4
          This is not an error in the program, but an incorrect algorithm, that is, the logic of behavior. At the beginning of the space age there were many similar errors. The most famous, perhaps, is the triggering of the emergency rescue system at the start. Then the start was delayed due to another sensor. The earth during the delay turned more than 7 degrees and the gyroscopes went down. The system decided that it was an accident and launched the SAS, when it was triggered, the descent compartment separated from the control room, the pipelines and hydrogen peroxide, the fuel of the orbital orientation engines broke, poured down onto the carrier. There was a fire and explosion.
        4. zhekazs
          zhekazs 12 December 2017 11: 44 New
          +1
          Quote: dauria
          For those who make the program, "the eye is blurred", it is difficult to double-check, an error is skipped - brains are on the same track. And the one who checks it is easier for him to write his own version than to catch fleas. After all, errors in the program are also logical, and it is much more difficult to catch them.

          But is it really impossible to involve a supercomputer in this business, to create emulation of launch for testing software in different critical situations? The machine’s eyes are not blurred, it will dispassionately fulfill all the given options. As noted in the article, the software was written in 1998 - and what, after that, did not make technological updates to the design of RB that did not entail a change in the software itself? And after that, how was it tested for operability and stability in different operating modes? Everything is strange, more on the great Russian races ... the guild seems ...
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 12 December 2017 13: 14 New
            +2
            Old software is not compatible with anything.
            With no modern computers.
            Even the F-22 software is so outdated that it is difficult to combine with modern systems.
            1. zhekazs
              zhekazs 12 December 2017 14: 05 New
              +1
              Quote: voyaka uh
              Old software is not compatible with anything.
              With no modern computers.

              Yah? And how then do we run on our computers old software that is not compatible with current OSs, but the same win-applications for Linux? The question here is not about incompatibility, it was necessary to create an environment that emulates the start of the Republic of Belarus and work out all the possible and impossible factors of the block. It makes no sense to guess, but the conclusion suggests itself that means not all the moments worked out, not all taken into account. But experience comes with errors and practice. So, although it is a pity about the unsuccessful launch, no one is safe from this, the main thing is that appropriate conclusions are drawn and measures are taken.
          2. dauria
            dauria 12 December 2017 17: 18 New
            0
            But is it really impossible to involve a supercomputer in this business, to create emulation of launch for testing software in different critical situations? The car's eyes are not blurred


            Do you understand that you are proposing to involve a program in the program check? And here's the trick - the more complex the system, the more errors there will be. Errors will appear that were not thought of before. At first it was simple - both the errors were primitive and the failures were purely physical. But already with the advent of conditional rules (and all programming is now finer than jurisprudence), violations of these rules appeared either random or intentional (for example, file structure errors of an old MS-DOS). Do you understand the situation, the hardware is working properly, and the system is sick? It became even worse with Windows - sharing resources added rules, but not all of them comply. There is "garbage" from remote programs, or vice versa - the library is deleted, to which other programs managed to bind.

            Soon the computer will be mistaken with purely human errors - "by default", etc. I do not understand, but I thought that ....
          3. Golovan Jack
            Golovan Jack 12 December 2017 21: 06 New
            +7
            Quote: zhekazs
            to create a run emulation for testing software in different critical situations?

            "Create" the Lord God will be? Or programmers?
            A (quality) fault emulator will be much more complicated than the system under test. The more complex the system, the greater the likelihood of errors in it. This is the alphabet.
            Where is the guarantee that there will be no critical errors in the emulator?
            There is no such guarantee.
            Quote: zhekazs
            The car’s eyes are not blurred, it will dispassionately fulfill all the given options

            That's it - "all given." And "set" - by whom? The same testers, read - programmers.
            Quote: zhekazs
            more on the great Russian races ... the guild seems

            More like an accident. Or sabotage, as anyone would like more.
            And accidents, they, this ... are different request
      6. region58
        region58 12 December 2017 10: 54 New
        +2
        Quote: Jedi
        Why wasn’t all the software rechecked ten times?

        The software can be checked, but they could load the data specifically for this launch with an error. For example, the coordinates of the start point.
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 12 December 2017 10: 57 New
          +3
          Which does not exclude the version of intentional disruption and sabotage.
      7. LSA57
        LSA57 12 December 2017 11: 15 New
        +2
        Quote: Jedi
        Why wasn’t all the software rechecked ten times?

        read more closely
        in accordance with a given algorithm, which was laid back in 1998 when creating this block

        how many times during this time has been double-checked? everything worked fine
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 13 December 2017 05: 00 New
          +1
          Quote: LSA57
          how many times during this time has been double-checked? everything worked fine

          Where? In Plisetsk or Baikonur? On the "Vostochny" Other data on the start location.
          "The software can be checked, but they could load the data specifically for this launch with an error. For example, the coordinates of the start point." Here I completely agree with region58.
          1. Sling cutter
            Sling cutter 13 December 2017 05: 08 New
            +1
            Quote: Amurets
            "The software can be checked, but they could load the data specifically for this launch with an error. For example, the coordinates of the start point."

            Colleague, welcome! hi
            It seems that all the reasons are here!
            https://youtu.be/aeEdTZWdx2I
            1. Amurets
              Amurets 13 December 2017 08: 04 New
              +1
              Quote: Stroporez
              It seems that all the reasons are here!

              And here too. And simple Russian disorder is not excluded
      8. akribos
        akribos 12 December 2017 11: 51 New
        +1
        Judging by the statement, she constantly turned in the wrong direction, and the accident just happened now. Not to cool? Nonsense!
      9. verner1967
        verner1967 12 December 2017 13: 37 New
        +2
        Quote: Jedi
        But seriously, what kind of gouging?

        Earlier in Russia, the switchman was to blame, now - the programmer. Progress, cho!
      10. Alf
        Alf 12 December 2017 21: 49 New
        +1
        Quote: Jedi
        Who will be punished?

        Storekeeper. I got the wrong flash drive.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 12 December 2017 10: 32 New
      +4
      Damn, survived! Even a plausible version of sloppiness can not come up with. belay Salaries need to be paid to those who do, and do not make excuses.
    3. Buffet
      Buffet 12 December 2017 11: 11 New
      +1
      The programmer mixed up a zero with a unity.
    4. Conductor
      Conductor 13 December 2017 01: 45 New
      +1
      This is not a fox! This is a herd of fat foxes !!!)))
  2. Ronald Reagan
    Ronald Reagan 12 December 2017 10: 09 New
    +1
    All this is sad, but the fittest survives. request
  3. Azazelo
    Azazelo 12 December 2017 10: 10 New
    0
    Even less would be paid to employees ... well, in general, you need to warm up the manual for the full program.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 12 December 2017 10: 12 New
      +1
      Well, what technician Vasya was downloading the program. And not the boss. And he downloaded the usual Baikonur program, and not on the East.
    2. Black water
      Black water 12 December 2017 10: 42 New
      0
      if an employee is sloppy, at least pay a million to him ..... there is a lack of control on his face and this is a system error .... sadly, such an industry and such a mess ......
  4. Mussasi
    Mussasi 12 December 2017 10: 11 New
    0
    And where are the resignations, dismissals? Several billion fell into the ocean! what
    1. SNEAKY
      SNEAKY 12 December 2017 10: 17 New
      +1
      What resignations, dismissals? Clearly otmazyvatsya. Guilty program! People have nothing to do with it! winked
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 12 December 2017 10: 36 New
      0
      For this it is necessary to plant, and not to reprimand!
    3. Conductor
      Conductor 13 December 2017 01: 47 New
      0
      So the state billionaires then fell, not their own))) And if they had fallen at least a piece, they would have torn from the top of the head to the heels.))
  5. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 December 2017 10: 11 New
    +2
    ... it’s time for someone to "rey" already ... angry
    1. Frol 7525
      Frol 7525 12 December 2017 10: 16 New
      +3
      Ostrov-raven raven eye will not peck ... wink
  6. Chichikov
    Chichikov 12 December 2017 10: 16 New
    +2
    As in a fairy tale, one kneads, and the second does not know what to do with these, or burn bricks, or bake pancakes.
    Everyone gets logarithms at school, and algorithms at Roskosmos.
  7. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 December 2017 10: 18 New
    +2
    Programmers are to blame ... It happens. I deal with complex software products myself. There is no way to avoid mistakes. It’s a pity that they are so expensive, these mistakes ...
    1. SNEAKY
      SNEAKY 12 December 2017 10: 23 New
      +1
      I don’t think that everything with brains is so complicated for putting into orbit, I mean specialists in this area.
      Not a supporter of conspiracy theories, but it hurts to smell like a deliberate, accidental mistake.
      1. Muvka
        Muvka 12 December 2017 10: 50 New
        +4
        Quote: SNEAKY
        I don’t think that everything with brains is so complicated for putting into orbit, I mean specialists in this area.
        Not a supporter of conspiracy theories, but it hurts to smell like a deliberate, accidental mistake.

        So you have no idea what programming is and how difficult it is, especially if you write not just you, but the whole team.
        1. SNEAKY
          SNEAKY 12 December 2017 11: 02 New
          +1
          Quote: Muvka
          Quote: SNEAKY
          I don’t think that everything with brains is so complicated for putting into orbit, I mean specialists in this area.
          Not a supporter of conspiracy theories, but it hurts to smell like a deliberate, accidental mistake.

          So you have no idea what programming is and how difficult it is, especially if you write not just you, but the whole team.

          And you want to tell me that after solving such a difficult task the team of programmers has never modeled the flight track? Doesn’t it smell bad to you? So they took it with raw software and tried to put it into orbit?
          1. Muvka
            Muvka 12 December 2017 11: 59 New
            +1
            It was modeled, but not from the East. In 98, there was not even a thought about Vostochny.
        2. UAZ 452
          UAZ 452 12 December 2017 20: 43 New
          0
          So you have no idea what programming is and how difficult it is, especially if you write not just you, but the whole team.

          You want to say that this gives programmers a reason not to be responsible for their work at all? It turned out - give the order, it didn’t work out - well, it happens.
  8. Strashila
    Strashila 12 December 2017 10: 18 New
    +2
    Another stupid excuse ... the software was to blame, they launched in the west direction ... no, as always in the east ... we urgently need to learn from the brothels, stop moving and rearrange the beds, and change the staff. I’m even afraid to think about the threat posed by military ICBMs of any basing, they should launch from anywhere in the world in any direction ... because Russia has one sixth of land and the probability of getting its own present is very high ... if you believe the next nonsense to explain senility with start up.
  9. vadimtt
    vadimtt 12 December 2017 10: 18 New
    +1
    Good bug, almost 20 years did not climb lol
    There is already no one to plant. The main thing is that there are now people who can figure out and correct this code without crawling out of available resources. If it doesn’t work out - then oh, development of a new control unit with new jambs.
  10. bardadym
    bardadym 12 December 2017 10: 20 New
    +1
    "Today, in the city of N, at the mutual intersection of a double continuous and with a serious speeding, two traffic police cars collided head-on. Heads of the work of the special commission showed that the rules violated themselves."
  11. Mik13
    Mik13 12 December 2017 10: 20 New
    +1
    Sadly ....
    However, taking advantage and even abusing the case, I would like to remind you of something ... Namely, about the "patriotic" comments on the article "Engine modification for the Falcon 9 exploded during testing"
    Quote: Elena Zakharova
    Rogozin is right, they better improve the trampoline.

    Quote: Logall
    Maxim, without our engines the USA will not have space! Who is the main space power? –Russia! May Meehan forgive me - soon we will be the first everywhere! Heh heh ...

    Quote: Black
    Doing spacecraft engines is not an iPad to cross with a screwdriver

    Exclusively for educational purposes, of course ...
  12. Mihanishche
    Mihanishche 12 December 2017 10: 21 New
    +2
    Well done, our clear and fast sorted out!
    The rocket launched - everything is fine, the rest is solved.
    1. Nasrat
      Nasrat 12 December 2017 10: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: Mikhanishche
      Well done, our clear and fast sorted out!
      The rocket launched - everything is fine, the rest is solved.


      Momento sea - instantly .... at sea !!! wassat
    2. Mik13
      Mik13 12 December 2017 12: 45 New
      +1
      Quote: Mikhanishche
      Well done, our clear and fast sorted out!
      The rocket launched - everything is fine, the rest is solved.

      And why do you have Rogozin in the picture without a trampoline? This is a serious mistake. This character should now fly with space along with a trampoline at every launch. Instead of the Frigate booster block. To follow the language.
      By the way, some comrades who are not comrades (c) declared that it would be cheaper to launch satellites into the World Ocean from a boat or from an aircraft carrier, if it is absolutely pathetic, it’s necessary ... And to build a cosmodrome for this is too expensive. For the new cut, the "East of the arena" would be quite enough
  13. Million
    Million 12 December 2017 10: 24 New
    0
    Engineers do not know where left. And where right?
  14. sxfRipper
    sxfRipper 12 December 2017 10: 27 New
    +1
    Complete nonsense! I myself am a programmer and I know that miracles do not happen. Unless in TK can nakosyachit. And here it turns out who is who - the programmer or programmer aka a bydlo encoder.
  15. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 12 December 2017 10: 27 New
    +2
    Interesting ... The algorithm was developed in 1998. and everything was fine. And this "Frigate" right-left beguiled?
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 12 December 2017 10: 52 New
      +2
      Maybe the problem is that they started from other places where this error did not appear, but then it appeared. The coordinates are different. And last year, another booster block was when they launched it from the east.
      1. region58
        region58 12 December 2017 11: 47 New
        +1
        Quote: Muvka
        May be a problem

        Telemetry would ... That's just to get these devices on the other side of the ball:
  16. Sergey53
    Sergey53 12 December 2017 10: 30 New
    +1
    Well, once you have found the cause, "heal." Yes, people pay normally so that it doesn’t reach sloppiness.
  17. ADmA_RUS
    ADmA_RUS 12 December 2017 10: 31 New
    +1
    Skoka wise guys. One pleases. You spend your talent, knowledge, hard work on other areas.
    Please do not go into space!
    After all, there, everything is very simple and easy! All solutions are boilerplate. Do not leave people without a beggarly salary! You will be bored and not interested there. And you may also have to write articles about UzhOS, defend candidate and doctoral.
  18. SNEAKY
    SNEAKY 12 December 2017 10: 36 New
    +2
    Quote: sxfRipper
    Complete nonsense! I myself am a programmer and I know that miracles do not happen. Unless in TK can nakosyachit. And here it turns out who is who - the programmer or programmer aka a bydlo encoder.

    By the way !!! I won’t believe in life that during all tests this flight program has not been tested. Damn it!
  19. Cxnumx
    Cxnumx 12 December 2017 10: 53 New
    0
    Ivanov noted that such problems with the algorithm that led to the loss of Frigate are “treated by software methods”
    they are treated with stars, so that it was painful to lie.
  20. viktor_ui
    viktor_ui 12 December 2017 11: 01 New
    0
    Enchantingly fuck-up (sorry moderators). Are they there, they write separate software for each launch ??? Or play with input constants from the bulldozer? Yes, yes, an absolutely imperfect program, which, as it wants, is also turned over by the accelerating block. Ivanov, apparently, is a miscarriage of Popovkin and his codes, whose cause lives and wins. fellow
  21. Vard
    Vard 12 December 2017 11: 06 New
    +1
    1998 ... I remember then in Russia they didn’t pay salaries at all ... at our refinery people fell into hungry faints ... it’s a miracle that the block didn’t fall apart at the start ...
  22. cedar
    cedar 12 December 2017 11: 06 New
    +3
    Let "learn" from NASA ... These "geniuses" as early as 1969 calculated the orientation of their returning lunar expeditions so that they avoided the inevitable death of their astronauts as many as 6 times in a row.
    Figuratively speaking, six times in a row they hit a penny from a distance of 600 (six hundred!) Meters!
    It’s nothing amazing that since then many bipeds in this country are clarifying their orientation according to NASA, changing it to the opposite ...
    1. Mihanishche
      Mihanishche 12 December 2017 11: 12 New
      0
      Quote: cedar

      Figuratively speaking, six times in a row they hit a penny from a distance of 600 (six hundred!) Meters!
      .
      - Be precise in the definitions. With 750 (seven hundred and fifty) meters!
      I do not like sloppiness in the calculations.
    2. Vlad Morozov
      Vlad Morozov 12 December 2017 11: 37 New
      0
      Big doubt! And about the moon - it’s possible to be quieter, otherwise the Martians will be offended, we were already there!
  23. Young_Communist
    Young_Communist 12 December 2017 11: 28 New
    +1
    control unit calculated rotation in the wrong direction
    What was a gray routine for the USSR turned into an almost insurmountable obstacle for Rogozin-Putin Russia. Yeah ...
  24. faiver
    faiver 12 December 2017 11: 32 New
    0
    ah how good - okay no one is to blame hi , it happened

    all is well beautiful marquise, all is good as never before
  25. Vlad Morozov
    Vlad Morozov 12 December 2017 11: 34 New
    0
    What does OTC do there? Got some fools or something ?! Good, and the testers ?! And finally - to drive the customer’s representative louse, so as not to look back! The representative from the Customer organizes the control and execution of the product, which means he is to blame! And to increase the salary - this will not solve the problem, the more you know there are no strikes there! First, the organization should be!
  26. JD1979
    JD1979 12 December 2017 11: 34 New
    0
    Ivanov noted that such problems with the algorithm that led to the loss of Frigate are “treated by software methods”

    Such problems are treated by landings and snow cleansing at the North Pole.
  27. iouris
    iouris 12 December 2017 11: 35 New
    0
    "The booster unit itself and its components (engines, control system) worked out in accordance with a predetermined algorithm, which was laid back in 1998 when this unit was created."
    Does the representative of Roscosmos consider all oligophrenics?
    1. UAZ 452
      UAZ 452 12 December 2017 20: 36 New
      +1
      Give up. Only 19 years have passed - just did not have time to check. And why didn’t the Frigates fall before? And who knows!
  28. Vadmir
    Vadmir 12 December 2017 12: 09 New
    +5
    One of the laws of programmers:
    Each program has an error; if it is not there, then it was poorly searched.
    Resolving the error leads to two new ones.
    But seriously, it does not make mistakes only the one who does not work.
    Can you imagine how much code this program can have? Personally, I do not. I had to write programs in which the code listing took up hundreds of pages, and the number of files was measured in thousands (although there were tiny ones among them), to check all this is an extremely difficult task.
    1. Golovan Jack
      Golovan Jack 12 December 2017 21: 16 New
      +8
      Quote: Vadmir
      Each program has an error; if it is not there, then it was poorly searched.

      Similarly: no healthy people. There are underexplored laughing
      And I completely agree with you, I myself am boiling in this mess. And I have been boiling for a long time, I saw a lot of interesting things.
      But the local tingent - it’s easy for someone to flood, for someone the task is to depress once again, when everything suddenly became bad (and it was perfect, yeah), for someone - to think up an "emulator" ...
      Everything in business, in short laughing
    2. ADmA_RUS
      ADmA_RUS 13 December 2017 06: 53 New
      0
      No. But this does not prevent them from evaluating others. People are tightly in a system of double standards.
  29. UAZ 452
    UAZ 452 12 December 2017 20: 33 New
    0
    It seems that the storekeeper who dropped a bunch of "Protons" got a job as a programmer after her dismissal.
  30. earloop
    earloop 13 December 2017 01: 37 New
    0
    Algorithms are developed by some people, while others are tested. To eliminate possible errors.
  31. Conductor
    Conductor 13 December 2017 01: 48 New
    0
    Quote: aszzz888
    ... it’s time for someone to "rey" already ... angry

    And upside down))) So that the rush of blood to the brain was
  32. Conductor
    Conductor 13 December 2017 01: 50 New
    0
    Quote: earloop
    Algorithms are developed by some people, while others are tested. To eliminate possible errors.

    And the storekeepers are rubbing))) But not successfully))
  33. NordUral
    NordUral 13 December 2017 14: 39 New
    0
    .................................................
    . well, all of them effective!
  34. lopvlad
    lopvlad 13 December 2017 16: 52 New
    +2
    occurred due to the fact that the control system of the unit calculated the rotation in the wrong direction


    as soon as a few people are sent for the “ten” years to places that are not so distant, the falls will stop in the right direction, the rotation will be in the right direction, the separation of satellite devices from the overclocking module will be timely, the solder will be of good quality and the sensors will stand correctly and not up legs.
    While this is not the case, we will each time contemplate the burning of billions of rubles in the atmosphere, and the State Duma will pass laws on new requisitions from citizens in order to patch up the hole that has formed.