Military Review

Commission on the INF Treaty starts in Geneva

37
A meeting of the Special Control Commission on the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (DIST) will begin today in Geneva, reports Interfax.




In Geneva, from 12 to 14 in December, the 31 session of the Special Control Commission on the INF Committee will take place.
Mikhail Ulyanov, Director of the Department for Non-Proliferation and Arms Control at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, told the agency.

According to him, the Russian side is determined to “try to find options for overcoming existing differences, but success depends, of course, not only on our side, but also on the availability of a similar attitude among American partners.”

The diplomat noted that the threat of Washington imposing sanctions on Russia would not help in finding a diplomatic solution to issues related to the treaty.

The threat of sanctions is not at all what contributes to success in finding diplomatic solutions. Russia is not a country to which such threats can act in the right direction for the Americans, rather, on the contrary,
He stressed.

Earlier in the American media, there were reports of Washington’s intention to impose sanctions on a number of Russian enterprises allegedly involved in activities prohibited by the INF Treaty. The United States accuses Russia of having some kind of ground-based cruise missile, the adoption of which is contrary to the provisions of the INF Treaty.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Jedi
    Jedi 12 December 2017 09: 53 New
    18
    The Russian side is determined to “try to find options for overcoming existing differences

    Dead number - the United States is set to ruin this treaty. yes
    1. Going
      Going 12 December 2017 09: 57 New
      +4
      It will be like a tug of war.
      1. dik-nsk
        dik-nsk 12 December 2017 11: 12 New
        +2
        they won’t even pull - they’ll just pretend, the mattresses don’t need this contract, but you need to pretend that the gap is our fault
        1. Stranger03
          Stranger03 12 December 2017 11: 20 New
          0
          It is necessary to place a couple of Iskander divisions in Cuba. Then you see, the agreement of the United States will increase significantly. And so, until there is a club near Washington, no one will agree.
    2. pvv113
      pvv113 12 December 2017 09: 58 New
      10
      This was seen initially. If the Yankees stupidly stick somewhere, then no reasonable arguments will stop them. As they say - one test tube is enough wink
      1. Going
        Going 12 December 2017 10: 10 New
        +4
        They see only one side, and the rest they deeply.
        1. pvv113
          pvv113 12 December 2017 10: 40 New
          +3
          It's like that rhino, if it sees a target, it aggressively rushes at it, and other mental functions of the brain are turned off
    3. aszzz888
      aszzz888 12 December 2017 09: 59 New
      +6
      Jedi Today, 09:53

      ... the mericatos have already accrued loot on their missiles ... suspiciously very small amount, they had made it quietly before the campaign ... and now they need to put it "legally" ...
    4. Chertt
      Chertt 12 December 2017 10: 01 New
      +2
      We are waiting for another dirty trick from the USA. Only now we are ready (hopefully)
    5. Angel_and_Demon
      Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 10: 09 New
      +6
      Quote: Jedi
      Dead number - the United States is set to ruin this treaty.

      mattresses are just scary, they only need it for sanctions, but we don’t need it, and we need to get out of it faster
    6. Alex777
      Alex777 12 December 2017 10: 13 New
      +3
      Maybe yes. They do not need him. But we need.
      Otherwise, the agreement on nuclear weapons will fall.
      IMHO there are only 2 of them left.
      1. Angel_and_Demon
        Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 10: 24 New
        +7
        Quote: Alex777
        Maybe yes. They do not need him. But we need.

        explain? to whom will the Yankees bullet them if it concerns only ground-based missiles? and we have goals - all over Europe have now been set, so think before you speak hi
        1. rocket757
          rocket757 12 December 2017 10: 55 New
          +3
          Yankees well done, in "patsaski" - the boy gave the word (signed a contract), wanted (necessary) took back!
          They will scare the geyropa, make new missiles, sell them or place them, it doesn’t matter, the percentages on the world arms market are still pulled over. And it doesn’t matter whether it is necessary or not, the job is done, babosiks are in the pocket of corporations !!!
          Why the congress on trump "rolls a barrel", the kid promised to raise production at home, to provide jobs !!! The kid did it!
          For our "diplomacy" pah, petty, not professionally. Although it’s the fault of politicians (those with low social standards) to go again, negotiate again, put it on them again ... that's all! They will write again that they \ we are observing us, we agree on everything, the "partners" threw them \ us !!! What, it was not clear in advance ???
          Saying that this is for the sake of peace, in the whole world ... yes, peace (relative) rests only on the threat of mutual annihilation and a balance has been reached long ago! All these systems of the neighbor, beyond the neighbor, will only add ashes to that which will remain after applying what is already there!
          Boiling up!
          Can anyone add or deny what I piled here?
          The boat rocked, and after the upcoming disgrace, which - Oh sport, you WORLD -. the boat may .....
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 11: 00 New
            +7
            Quote: rocket757
            Can anyone add or deny what I piled here?

            Saying that this is for the sake of peace, in the whole world ... yes, peace (relative) rests only on the threat of mutual annihilation and a balance has been reached long ago! All these systems of the neighbor, beyond the neighbor, will only add ashes to that which will remain after applying what is already there!

            I’ll only add that the content of ballistic missiles is much more expensive than the INF, and the treaty concerns only us and the states, and even the same suit does not prohibit riveting them, by the way, and to the nuclear countries - France, Germany, India, Pakistan, and even more so Israel and even more so hi
            1. rocket757
              rocket757 12 December 2017 12: 55 New
              +4
              I can add that the warranty period for nuclear munitions is very limited and this is subject to very proper storage. Another bunch of other difficulties, such as the depletion of mines and the price of nuclear materials and ....
              We have such missiles, only to frighten the geyrop ... to the Americans they need to be brought very close to their territory. But it’s logical to frighten the geyrop, too, they are at our borders, give the Yankees the opportunity to place / store what they need !!!
              And there are many more justified and necessary.
              All this is not sad already, but just scary.
              In which case, no one will survive the missile route along the summer route, and the opponents have nothing to talk about.
              It’s just that the agony will stretch somewhat over time, that’s the whole difference.
        2. Polite Moose
          Polite Moose 12 December 2017 11: 17 New
          +3
          Quote: Angel_and_Demon
          explain? to whom will the Yankees bullet them if it concerns only ground-based missiles? and we have goals - all over Europe have now been set, so think before you speak

          Victor! hi Except in us, on the European continent, there is no one to bullet. And they are going to do this from their bases located in the territories of the EU countries. They will use the very INF, which were reduced by agreement. Flight time is much shorter than ICBMs. those. ignore the threat we will not succeed. But these are all common truths.
          Before the termination of the INF Treaty, there are not so many goals in Europe. There wasn’t much who wanted to fight with us, besides the Baltic states, Poles and, of course, Ukrainians. But this desire is very unstable. To the first plop. But, as soon as American INF systems appear in Europe, we will have to deploy similar systems in large quantities. This will attract considerable financial resources. P-ss at the same time do not risk anything. They have a dough in bulk and their territory is unattainable for the INF. We have limited funds and there are more worthy goals for their application. Therefore, the INF Treaty should be tried with all our might. And to pressure that Europeans become hostages of the situation and sometimes even show them what we will use in response.
          Although, most likely, everyone sees everything and everyone understands everything. And this agreement will be just a bargaining chip in some other game. hi
          1. Angel_and_Demon
            Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 11: 34 New
            +6
            Quote: Polite Moose
            Except in us, on the European continent, there is no one to bullet. And they are going to do this from their bases located in the territories of the EU countries.

            here I am about the same thing, but are they building more and more bases, and with what equipment?
            vertical launchers Mk-41 of the Aegis system, which can equally be used to launch operational and tactical missiles Tomahawk, missiles for missile defense and missile defense SM-2, SM-3, SM-6, RIM-7M Sea Sparrow , RIM-162A ESSM, as well as anti-submarine missiles (PLUR) RUM-139 VLA (ASROC).
            1. Polite Moose
              Polite Moose 12 December 2017 11: 48 New
              0
              Quote: Angel_and_Demon
              here I am about the same thing, but are they building more and more bases, and with what equipment?
              vertical launchers Mk-41 of the Aegis system, which can equally be used to launch operational and tactical missiles Tomahawk, missiles for missile defense and missile defense SM-2, SM-3, SM-6, RIM-7M Sea Sparrow , RIM-162A ESSM, as well as anti-submarine missiles (PLUR) RUM-139 VLA (ASROC).

              Here is to ensure that in the launchers did not appear KR, and we need an agreement on INF.
              And the presence of the installations themselves at our borders is another agreement: on missile defense.
              1. Angel_and_Demon
                Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 11: 52 New
                +6
                Quote: Polite Moose
                Here is to ensure that in the launchers did not appear KR

                and who is stopping the Germans or Poles and their ilk from making them at least under their own license? because they are not bound by this treaty?
                1. Polite Moose
                  Polite Moose 12 December 2017 11: 55 New
                  0
                  Common sense and our defense industry. And also vindictive voters, who are periodically remembered and kissed in ...
                  1. Angel_and_Demon
                    Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 12: 06 New
                    +6
                    Quote: Polite Moose
                    Common sense

                    and you found him from them? Congratulations!!!! good
                    1. Polite Moose
                      Polite Moose 12 December 2017 12: 31 New
                      0
                      Which of the heads of state in Europe can boast of a strong position and high rating? Nobody will voluntarily rock the chair, making its citizens-voters a target for our missiles. They still endure the support of sanctions, grinding their teeth, but will they suffer the role of hostages in the military confrontation with Russia? I don’t think so.
                      1. Angel_and_Demon
                        Angel_and_Demon 12 December 2017 16: 08 New
                        +6
                        as the mattresses say - it will be so, and for a long time they spat on the voters, if something depended on the voters, would Merkelikha evict the locals and populate refugees in their place? and at the same time forcing owners to make repairs at their own expense before moving them request
    7. siberalt
      siberalt 12 December 2017 10: 45 New
      +1
      Why did they get into Syria for chemical weapons, and to Israel for nuclear weapons? Or is Israel not constantly bombing its neighbors and all the “controllers” for non-proliferation of nuclear weapons sends to hell? winked
      1. Grandfather
        Grandfather 12 December 2017 10: 48 New
        +2
        agreement with the Americans can be in one case: if they themselves crawl to us, and beg for negotiations.
      2. Jedi
        Jedi 12 December 2017 10: 48 New
        +3
        Quote: siberalt
        Why did they get into Syria for chemical weapons, and to Israel for nuclear weapons?

        If only because in Israel there are no oil and gas fields. wink
        1. Grandfather
          Grandfather 12 December 2017 10: 58 New
          +1
          Quote: Jedi
          If only because in Israel there are no oil and gas fields.

          praise Moses ...
    8. ser-pov
      ser-pov 12 December 2017 15: 54 New
      0
      I already said .. You can score on the status of not to militarize the Arctic and put rockets there, and Cuba is not needed! The flying time to pin.dos is minimal and no one has the Caribbean crisis! And the bases are ready ...
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 12 December 2017 09: 55 New
    +2
    Washington’s intention to impose sanctions
    ... it’s already as if it’s done ... any reason, and without it - but to blame Russia for everything ... we need to get used to it already and just send them to the forest ... angry
    1. Ankipelgygyrgyn
      Ankipelgygyrgyn 12 December 2017 09: 56 New
      +2
      Yes, there’s nothing to talk about and no one with.
  3. d ^ Amir
    d ^ Amir 12 December 2017 09: 57 New
    +2
    meeting of the Special Control Commission

    according to tradition, our missiles will accuse meldonium and impose sanctions on this subject ...
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 12 December 2017 10: 03 New
    +1
    The USA decided that it was urgent in Europe to "poke" medium-range missiles ... Like the flying time is minimal, like a bang - and Russia is on its knees ... And all this is garbage. They are so cowardly even for indistinct threats from the DPRK, while Russia’s nuclear weapons are obviously not cardboard ... wassat
    1. Going
      Going 12 December 2017 10: 11 New
      +3
      It is clear that only the air will be shaken, but they will be crap.
  5. Romanenko
    Romanenko 12 December 2017 10: 22 New
    0
    The city of Geneva, is it somewhere in the vicinity of Washington or what?
  6. Chichikov
    Chichikov 12 December 2017 10: 25 New
    0
    The result is known in advance. To deceive the cheaters, - to fly, and over Geneva, turn back. The plane flies to Russia!
  7. novel66
    novel66 12 December 2017 10: 27 New
    +3
    "experiencing some ground-based cruise missile"
    , whoo! sniffed something. secrecy, secrecy and secrecy again! enough openness
  8. JonnyT
    JonnyT 12 December 2017 11: 54 New
    0
    Everyone digs under Iskander, he is like a bone in his throat!