In the Russian Federation began testing a robotic complex for the Airborne Forces

8
A new multifunctional drone to provide the Airborne and Ground Forces enters the state tests stage, RIA News Post Airborne Commander Andrei Serdyukov.

In the Russian Federation began testing a robotic complex for the Airborne Forces
Multifunctional robotic combat support complex "Nerekhta" (archival photo).



Development work on the development of a multifunctional robotic complex based on a light and medium chassis to solve the tasks of ensuring combat operations of the Ground Forces and Airborne Forces, is entering the stage of state testing.
said Serdyukov at the gathering of the leadership of the troops, passing in Ryazan.

He also spoke about the development of new cargo parachute systems and design development to create a parachute system that works without human intervention and entering reconnaissance chemical machines into the Airborne Forces, created in the framework of the development project “Carriage-2”.

In addition, the commander reported on the work on a new air defense assets management system for the ROC “Barnaul-T”.

As part of improving the airborne command and control system and expanding the capabilities of automated command and control of troops, the Kassiopeya-D development project is being conducted. As a result, a basic set of communications and automated control will appear, which will be installed on the BMD-4М, BTR-MDM basic armored tracked chassis,
added Serdyukov.
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    11 December 2017 15: 28
    This sho on his hump "Cord".
    Dill "phantom" looks pale in comparison with real military equipment.
  2. +2
    11 December 2017 15: 39
    And the execution of voice commands. So I imagine the picture: - Well, bro, drive to that lowland, scout the situation!
    Or take the wounded out of the battlefield, ”he hooked the drag.“ Home, guard!
  3. +5
    11 December 2017 16: 01
    all this requires effective and secure communication (control) means .. and here we are decently behind ... the electronic warfare equipment will turn on and all this equipment will stand up ... you can’t extend the cable for each drone
    Quote: Lena Petrova
    Or take the wounded out of the battlefield, ”he hooked the drag.“ Home, guard!

    and crawl along the field of the nurse ...
    1. 0
      11 December 2017 16: 35
      Quote: assa67
      EW tools will turn on and all this equipment will get up ... you can’t stretch the cable behind each drone

      Andrew! hi Not everything is so sad. The solution of the problem rests on finances. Nobody has yet canceled pseudo-random frequency tuning. I don’t know in what state the development of communication facilities with the MSSP with radiation level at the level of natural ethereal noises is now, but several years ago I read about this in our military-industrial complex. Yes, even if you strangle the entire radio range with EWB, you can organize a communication channel through the laser beam for direct visibility, which is quite successfully used by the Chinese on their armored vehicles. If there is no line of sight, then a flying drone repeater will help. All this is technically uncomplicated, but leads to an increase in the cost of the finished product. There will be a need for such bells and whistles - a new head for the drones will be fastened in 5 seconds.
      1. +5
        11 December 2017 16: 45
        welcome hi ..I am pleased to read your comments .... the laser is good ... but, I mentioned that we are behind in this plan. Yes, the development was carried out, and quite successfully ... take for example closed channels of government communications .. and again I agree that everything comes down to financing ... and what a wonderful slogan was under the Union: to Catch up and overtake good
        1. 0
          11 December 2017 17: 00
          Quote: assa67
          ..take for example closed channels of government communications ..

          Well, tell me ... Do you know something? What is the tolerance level? Or simply ...
          1. +4
            11 December 2017 17: 06
            admission 1-A .... if something tells you that)))) .... and the subscription is valid for another 16 years, so sorry hi
            1. +3
              11 December 2017 19: 38
              Tolerances-shmopuski be-ee!
              Do not take it personally, at my own, pensioner, I remembered.
              There is a debate in the IT party, whose AI will be smarter. Really, in such a large device, you can cram a very smart (large) comp. I was considering a bomber control computer with a ballistic computer ... if you do not take all the external sensors, the device is small. It’s possible to hammer into it an algorithm of action of narrow specialization. Of course, he will not be able to bandage the fighter, but to inject and deliver the injection, this is very real. There are such developments and not only with us.