Military Review

Rosguard will receive armored personnel carriers BTR-82В

49
Jane's Defense Weekly magazine, with reference to Military Industrial Company LLC, published some details about the BTR-82В armored personnel carrier developed for the Russian Guard. Material leads bmpd.




“In fact, the BTR-82В is a modernized armored personnel carrier BTR-82А with the installation of the“ old ”standard Soviet armored personnel carrier in the form of a single turret with a 14,5-mm KPVT machine gun and a PKTM-X machine gun,” the publication says.

500 ammunition ammunition caliber 14,5 mm and 2000 ammunition caliber 7,62 mm. In the rear of the tower installed 6 smoke grenade 902В "Cloud".

According to the information, as well as the base BTR-82А, the BTR-82В armored personnel carrier is equipped with a KAMAZ-740.14-300 diesel engine with an 300 hp power. with a new manual transmission.

The mass of armored vehicles - 15 t, capacity 10 people. It is reported that the BTR is equipped with a “P-168-25-2 digital radio station, a navigation system, a combined day-night observation device commander TKN-3MK with a second-generation image intensifier, and a night-time device driver-TVN-5. Installed a system of protection against weapons of mass destruction ".
Photos used:
LLC Military Industrial Company (via Jane's)
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Sergey53
    Sergey53 8 December 2017 12: 38 New
    +1
    Outwardly, almost the same BTR 60-PB.
    1. MoJloT
      MoJloT 8 December 2017 12: 48 New
      0
      I thought the same thing)) Well, maybe the varieties of armor, layout, on-board systems and weapons have become more technologically advanced. This is my guess.
    2. Skeptic
      Skeptic 8 December 2017 12: 50 New
      +2
      Quote: Sergey53
      Outwardly, almost the same BTR 60-PB.

      Lukashenko bought a batch of btr82a at a price of $ 1ml apiece. At first I did not believe it. Is there everything inside that is mahogany and sheathed in leather doe, and also encrusted with diamonds?
      1. Piramidon
        Piramidon 8 December 2017 15: 02 New
        +3
        Quote: SkepticCynic
        Lukashenko bought a batch of btr82a at a price of $ 1ml apiece.

        Sales receipt in the studio! Otherwise, you get a prize:
    3. Falcond
      Falcond 8 December 2017 12: 56 New
      +8
      Outwardly usual 80ka ..
      On 60 doors there are no such on the sides .. yes and the case is different
      1. Sergey53
        Sergey53 8 December 2017 13: 29 New
        +1
        All this is understandable. As for the armor, the composition is different, and diesel engines, and the door on the side. Classic is still in use.
    4. hohkn
      hohkn 8 December 2017 16: 53 New
      0
      Quote: Sergey53
      Outwardly, almost the same BTR 60-PB.

      Yah? Outwardly, it is an BTR-80. Side hatches are completely differently arranged. And so there are enough differences by eye. Compare for yourself: BTR-60BP

      BTR-80A
    5. edge
      edge 9 December 2017 10: 01 New
      0
      Quote: Sergey53
      Outwardly, almost the same BTR 60-PB.

      yah....
  2. Ratmir_Ryazan
    Ratmir_Ryazan 8 December 2017 12: 47 New
    +6
    And what has changed in comparison with the BTR-80 ?! The hull is different, thicker and lining and more resistant to mines and land mines ?! And why not even thermal sights ?! 2nd generation nightlight, it's better than nothing, but now it's out of date ...
    Why supply equipment to the Russian Guard that is inferior to NATO and Chinese and even Ukrainian models of similar equipment in terms of both armament and surveillance capabilities and protection against weapons of destruction ?!
    1. Sail
      Sail 8 December 2017 12: 49 New
      10
      This is probably not for an external enemy, but a demonstration to disperse, and that's enough.
      1. cariperpaint
        cariperpaint 8 December 2017 12: 58 New
        11
        oh enough already ah! zadolbali with these accelerations. when armor dispersed with us? one underdeveloped topic raised with demonstrations, others still will not calm down.
      2. Piramidon
        Piramidon 8 December 2017 15: 56 New
        0
        Quote: Segel
        This is probably not for an external enemy, but a demonstration to disperse, and that's enough.

        People like you I myself would have dispersed without an armored personnel carrier.
        1. Andy
          Andy 9 December 2017 15: 18 New
          0
          pyramidone, take haloperidol and stop being rude to people
          1. Piramidon
            Piramidon 9 December 2017 15: 36 New
            +1
            Quote: Andy
            pyramidone, take haloperidol and stop being rude to people

            1. I didn’t communicate with you at all and didn’t drink at Brudershaft.
            2. What is "rudeness"? I politely enough answered the representative of the “white-collar workers,” (but, again, not for you personally), to his statement that the Rosgvadia is needed for a war with its own people. Or are you also from the same camp?
            1. Andy
              Andy 9 December 2017 15: 47 New
              0
              got to divide into camps! What rudeness, but do not you understand? lack of education?
              on “you” - because I’m not going to talk to hooligans (even virtual ones)
              1. Piramidon
                Piramidon 9 December 2017 15: 51 New
                +2
                Quote: Andy
                What rudeness, but do not you understand?

                Well, you broke up, and hooliganism has already sewn to me. And specifically, you can explain what you saw "rudeness" and especially "hooliganism"? But just you are rude to me not childish.
                If you have not forgotten, I personally did not touch you at all, and you pounced on me like a chain dog.
    2. Pancir026
      Pancir026 8 December 2017 12: 51 New
      +5
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      Why supply equipment to the Russian Guard

      And do you think the Rosguard is a means to war with an external adversary?
      If not, then this is enough for the eyes. Do not confuse the armament of the army with the armament of the internal. In essence the gendarme forces.
      1. Alexey RA
        Alexey RA 8 December 2017 13: 24 New
        +5
        Quote: Pancir026
        And do you think the Rosguard is a means to war with an external adversary?

        Like the original explosives - reserve army.
        The NKVD troops in the Great Patriotic War fought pretty well - starting from Brest and the Baltic states, and further under St. Petersburg, in Stalingrad, Voronezh, etc.
        1. Pancir026
          Pancir026 8 December 2017 13: 43 New
          +1
          Quote: Alexey RA
          Like the original explosives - reserve army.

          I don’t argue .. in the war, but everything will be subordinated to the army. Retrain from BTR80, to BTR82, there are absolutely no problems.
          Nevertheless, the armament of the WG, in peacetime, along with the army, is absolutely unnecessary.
    3. lukewarm
      lukewarm 8 December 2017 13: 04 New
      +4
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      Why supply equipment to the Russian Guard that is inferior to NATO and Chinese and even Ukrainian models in terms of armament and surveillance capabilities and protection against weapons of destruction

      But the Russian Guard is sobsno and should not fight with NATO. She fights terror and her population.
      1. Glory1974
        Glory1974 8 December 2017 14: 29 New
        +1
        She fights terror and her population.

        And they need armored personnel carriers at demonstrations to crush! wassat
        1. Piramidon
          Piramidon 8 December 2017 15: 58 New
          +1
          Quote: glory1974
          And they need armored personnel carriers at demonstrations to crush!

          Are you personally crushed, or did Lech Navalny advise you to drop this shovel of manure here?
          1. Glory1974
            Glory1974 8 December 2017 16: 17 New
            0
            I wrote it inevitably. And so that there was no double interpretation, he put a smiley face.
            That is sarcasm, but not a shovel of manure. hi
    4. tchoni
      tchoni 8 December 2017 13: 26 New
      0
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      The hull is different, thicker and lining and more resistant to mines and land mines ?!

      Yes, yes! The case is a little different. The bottom is slightly thicker and added shatterproof lining. And the rest, a beautiful marquise, all the same old armored personnel carrier.
    5. alexmach
      alexmach 8 December 2017 14: 04 New
      +1
      And what has changed in comparison with the BTR-80 ?!

      Hmm .. but is it not written in the article about this?

      Why supply equipment to the Russian Guard that is inferior to NATO and Chinese and even Ukrainian models of similar equipment in terms of both armament and surveillance capabilities and protection against weapons of destruction ?!

      Maybe because the Russian Guard is not an army, it has its own tasks and it needs to be completed with something. But Typhoons do not stoop at all?
    6. Lexus
      Lexus 8 December 2017 15: 56 New
      +2
      More suitable not for war, but for the dispersal of dissent ...
    7. hohkn
      hohkn 8 December 2017 16: 56 New
      0
      Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
      Why supply equipment to the Russian Guard that is inferior to NATO and Chinese and even Ukrainian models of similar equipment in terms of both armament and surveillance capabilities and protection against weapons of destruction ?!

      Have you ever used it yourself to say such a thing?
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. Gardamir
    Gardamir 8 December 2017 12: 55 New
    +1
    Like, if the authorities do not like the result of the elections, then let the National Guard vote. Every day articles about their strengthening.
    1. Piramidon
      Piramidon 8 December 2017 16: 02 New
      0
      Quote: Gardamir
      Like, if the authorities do not like the result of the elections, then let the National Guard vote. Every day articles about their strengthening.

      Scary, Navalny? That's for that and the National Guard, so that the whole liberal trap was only perpetrated under oneself, and not in social networks and at white-handed rallies.
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 8 December 2017 16: 08 New
        +2
        Scary, Navalny?
        Firstly, I’m rather a supporter of the one on your avatar. Secondly, the liberals are the government, led by the president.
        And finally, gaspadin, apparently, you are also not the first day on social networks.
  5. Mihanishche
    Mihanishche 8 December 2017 13: 29 New
    0
    Well done our! They wiped the nose for the staff. Good machine, reliable, strong, capacious. Significant superiority over all Western models guarantees our guys success in battle.
    I’ll jump on such a one when the Supreme will also command Europe ... hehe ...
  6. Geisenberg
    Geisenberg 8 December 2017 13: 57 New
    0
    Another article for nothing
  7. Anyone
    Anyone 8 December 2017 14: 16 New
    +1
    Quote: Alexey RA
    NKVD troops in the Great Patriotic War ...

    In vain do you compare the employees of some RosKokardia’s structure (I won’t call the former cops a guard so as not to offend the memory of the Soviet guard and my grandfather - Guards Colonel), such as FSUE Okhrana, with soldiers, for example, the 20th Infantry Division NKVD.
    1. Glory1974
      Glory1974 8 December 2017 14: 28 New
      +1
      I will not call the former cops guard, so as not to offend the memory of the Soviet guard

      What does the title of "guard" and the name of the structure? Did you learn homonyms at school?
      type FSUE "Guard" with fighters, for example, the 20th Infantry Division of the NKVD.

      And why not compare soldiers from operational units, special forces and reconnaissance battalions with their ancestors?
      For your information, the internal troops have been fighting since the 1985 of the year, almost without interruption.
      1. Anyone
        Anyone 8 December 2017 14: 37 New
        +1
        Wrong question. Do not ask me if I have studied the "words of homonyms." Better ask the country's leadership for what purpose it used this homonym (ok, I accept your thesaurus)? The etymology of the term "guard" - selected military units. This is the generally accepted meaning of the word. Will you argue?
        1. Glory1974
          Glory1974 8 December 2017 14: 44 New
          +1
          The etymology of the term "guard" - selected military units.

          It fits the definition of the Russian Guard: they selected military units to perform certain tasks.
          1. Anyone
            Anyone 8 December 2017 14: 47 New
            +1
            That is, you are claiming that now the guard is the servicemen of the Rosguard who were "selected"? Well, that's what I said about this disgrace))
            1. Glory1974
              Glory1974 8 December 2017 15: 02 New
              0
              Are you claiming that now the guard is the servicemen of the Rosguard who have been "selected"?

              the troops of the Moscow Region did not abolish the guard. The title "guard" was not transferred to other structures. Everything in the Moscow Region remained as it was. The Guard, as it was, remains.
              The structure, which is called the Federal Service of the National Guard Forces, has nothing to do with the title of "guard".
              1. Anyone
                Anyone 8 December 2017 15: 31 New
                0
                I know. It's about another: Rosguard = Russian Guard = Guard of Russia. Here is such an etymological sequence. In the minds of ordinary people, it is precisely such an association with the guard that will be fixed. That is, the guard for the conditional citizen is now the guys with the inscription OMON on their backs.
  8. Anyone
    Anyone 8 December 2017 14: 41 New
    0
    Quote: glory1974
    And why not compare soldiers from operational units, special forces and reconnaissance battalions with their ancestors?

    What does military intelligence and special forces have to do with the Russian Guard? What are you talking about? )))
    1. Glory1974
      Glory1974 8 December 2017 14: 53 New
      +1
      What does military intelligence and special forces have to do with the Russian Guard? What are you talking about? )))

      I realized that you know absolutely nothing about this structure.
      And the structure of the Russian Guard includes units and formations of operational designation, reconnaissance battalions and detachments, and special forces. All of these units regularly participate in hostilities in the North Caucasus region.
      You will probably be very surprised, but as part of the Russian Guard there are several naval units, and units of combat swimmers.
      1. Anyone
        Anyone 8 December 2017 15: 19 New
        0
        Yes, anyone can enter this strange structure: from security guards to military swimmers - I believe with pleasure! You would then specify what kind of "special forces" and "reconnaissance battalions" do you mean: army or something else))
        And in general, you were carried to another steppe. I told you at the very beginning of our conversation that for millions of people in our country, the guard is parts, I quote, "who received an honorary title and were transformed into guards for mass heroism, courage and high military skill shown in battles."
        And the name of VeVeshnikov, security guards, etc. "guard" - is a discredit of the concept of "guards." I suspect that this was done on purpose.
        1. Glory1974
          Glory1974 8 December 2017 15: 31 New
          0
          for millions of people in our country, the guard is parts, I quote, "who received the honorary title

          I'm trying to tell you that title and title are two different things. No more.
          Like at a university, a teacher may have the academic title “professor”, earned by him as a result of hard scientific research.
          Or maybe the post is "professor", and this position can be held by any other teacher.
          And nothing, no one is outraged. They understand all the difference.
          And if we initially talk about the name of the structure, so could the field gendarmerie, and carabinieri, and blue eggs. The name was chosen not with batch, but in accordance with traditions, rules, including taking into account the opinion of the heraldic commission under the President of the Russian Federation.
          1. Anyone
            Anyone 8 December 2017 15: 40 New
            0
            You are doing primitive demagogy. Another time, I would make you company in this fascinating occupation, but now, alas, busy ...
            Yes, pump on the heraldic commission under the president! I repeat: the guard in the minds of the people is the guard units, not the guardsmen. But the authorities want it to be different. You are a good example))
          2. Sergej1972
            Sergej1972 8 December 2017 16: 04 New
            0
            The result of hard scientific research is rather a doctor of science. The academic title is the result of successful educational, scientific and methodological activities. At the same time, a scientist, doctor of sciences, but not involved in teaching, will not receive the academic title of professor, and will not be able to work as a professor.
            1. Anyone
              Anyone 9 December 2017 01: 42 New
              0
              For some reason, it seems to me that you understand what I'm talking about, but stubbornly pretend not to)) Our dialogue reminds me of one Internet discourse regarding certain rights of people of non-traditional sexual orientation. They demanded permission to marry. I really do not care about who, whom, and how, but do not call it marriage. Let them come up with a different name)) Here is a similar situation. I do not at all oppose the creation of a structure of riot police, veVeshnikov, ex-VOKhRovtsev, etc. They created - and God bless him. This fits into the framework of the paranoid fear of our leadership before possible street performances. But, damn it, do not call this Cop Zoo Guard!
  9. Sorry
    Sorry 8 December 2017 17: 43 New
    0
    The Russian Guard is a fist. I will answer those who believe that she is against the people. When it was created, guess who first bequeathed? Correctly! State Department. This structure, its strength, armament, and preparedness makes us think those who want to implement plans for color. The revolution. Etc. etc. I understand this, although I myself suffered from its creation.
  10. Nemesis
    Nemesis 8 December 2017 18: 34 New
    +2
    Well, why equip explosive weapons with obsolete weapons with insufficient firepower to fight Islamic militant gangs ?!
  11. Viktor.N.Aleksandrov.
    Viktor.N.Aleksandrov. 9 December 2017 00: 02 New
    +1
    Indeed, it is strange to deliberately worsen the armament of the army reserve. For purely police functions (like some tryndy - dispersal of demonstrations, suppression of their people), this APC is clearly redundant in any form. Why, for example, 8 wheels, the ability to swim. Our navalnitsy prefer to move along the well-asphalted streets, and not through impassable dirt of the Russian hinterland. And the dimensions are too big. To suppress gangs and an automatic gun would not be superfluous, why change it to a machine gun, albeit a heavy one?