Military Review

"Racism is the opposite." What awaits modern France?

48
In December, the 2017 year in France must undergo a series of trainings against racism. Well, the reason is quite noble, if only the actions were not organized by “racists on the contrary”. The fact that uncontrolled flows of migrants have long ago changed the ethnic and religious image of modern France is well known. But increasingly, migrants are beginning to claim not only social support from the state, but also political influence. There are more and more of them, which means that they can no longer only ask, but also demand.


Back in 1970 - 1980 - years migrants from African and Middle Eastern countries could really talk about some kind of discrimination. At that time, ultra-right nationalists were active, including overt racists who committed crimes against visitors. In 1990, the situation began to change, and now it’s time for the French, not migrants, to worry. Moreover, the "quality" of migrants has changed. In place of bona fide "workers" came "hunters for benefits." As for the second and third generation of migrants, many of their representatives could not (or did not want to?) Fit into the social life of French society. The areas inhabited by migrants turned into modern “ghettos”. It was about them the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard wrote: “burn and rob the best that it can offer - cars, schools, shopping centers. Kindergartens! This is exactly what we wanted to integrate immigrants with. ”

"Racism is the opposite." What awaits modern France?


By the way, a significant part of the terrorists who participated in the attacks on European cities are representatives of the second and third generation. They are no longer migrants. They are French citizens, with non-French names only. Most of them are from a socially disadvantaged environment, marginalized, prone to committing crimes, anti-social behavior, drug use. The protest against the values ​​of European society, against the foundations of the most European civilization became for them a new ideology. Moreover, this ideology can take both religious (fundamentalism) and political (“leftism”) forms.

Modern European "anti-fascism", "anti-racism" - this is also a form of ideology. In fact, representatives of these organizations are not against racism, but against Europeans as such. They are willing to accept only those Europeans who endlessly “repent” of colonialism and imperialism. Today, the label "racist" or "Nazi" can be hung on almost any European, if he even for a second thinks about the problems associated with the presence of countless migrants.

Ahead of the "anti-racists", as usual, the French leftists. Among them, there are more and more immigrants from the countries of Asia and Africa who understand the modern social class confrontation as the struggle of the “world periphery” against the “golden billion”.



The radical union SUD, which is going to organize “anti-racist trainings,” simply banned entry to its events for all “whites”. Of course, such SUD groups are not so influential, occupying a rather marginal position in French politics. But if we talk about the "system", parliamentary politics, and on the streets of cities, especially on the outskirts of Paris, in Marseille, "racists on the contrary" gradually begin to "rule the ball." Already, there are areas where the French and other Europeans do not dare to go, and the police and gendarmes appear in large groups and are well-armed.

Of course, it would be wrong to classify all or even the majority of migrants living in France as antisocial groups. As elsewhere, normal people predominate among them, but they do not control the streets of French cities, they don’t fight the police on the barricades, commit acts of terrorism or trade in drugs. All this makes a minority, but it is too active and noticeable. Everyone suffers from the actions of the radicals, including their own fellow tribesmen. French citizens of Arab and African descent have long and in large numbers served in the gendarmerie, the police, the army. Among them are many entrepreneurs whose shops and cafes suffer during street riots. Of course, bombs or trucks of terrorists do not choose their victims on the basis of nationality or religion.

However, “racists on the contrary” explicitly state that in France there are “too many whites”, it’s time to change the ethnic and racial composition of the country's population. Joan Louis, representing the organization of immigrants from African and Asian countries CRAN argues that the French government adheres to the ideology of "state racism." This is, of course, a lie. In France, even the official notion of "ethnic minority". All - and ethnic French, Basques, and Algerian or Moroccan Arabs, and Africans from Senegal, Mali and the Congo are considered to be "French" if they have French citizenship. Accordingly, from a legal point of view, we cannot talk about any policy of discrimination.

On the contrary, the French government is making very large-scale efforts to integrate visitors into French society. The problem is that a significant part of the migrants themselves are not going to integrate. It is convenient for them to live in their ethnic quarters, “ghettos”, to communicate within communities and diasporas, maximum with other migrants. It is beneficial for them to emphasize their “special status” by constantly recalling the horrors of colonialism and accusing the French state and ordinary French people of discrimination on the basis of race.

In fact, “black racism” is at least about a hundred years old. Back in the 1920s, African-American political organizations appeared in the United States that advocated “racial purity” and opposed contacts with “whites.” Further development of “black racism” was received in religious-political communities like the “Nation of Islam”. In the 1960s, when the African-American anti-segregation movement gained momentum, radical groups like Black Panthers appeared. A special contribution to the development of “black racism” was made by the theorists of the Negrit here.

The concept of self-worth and originality of the Negroid race was developed by the Senegalese poet and philosopher Leopold Sedar Senghor (later he became president of Senegal) and two people from the French colonies in the Caribbean - the poet Aime Seather from Martinique and the writer Leon Damas from French Guiana. All of them, by the way, despite the ideas of African exclusivity, received a good European education and were generally European-oriented people. Leopold Sedar Senghor (pictured), for example, studied at the Sorbonne and the Practical School of Higher Studies, received a degree in philology. Aime Sezer studied at the Higher Normal School in Paris. In France, he was educated and Leon Damas. Of course, as educated people, the founders of the Negritdu concept did not reflect on the fact that in a few decades their ideas would influence the appearance of “racism the other way around”.

The epoch of decolonization brought a new interpretation to the Negrituda. He formed the basis of a number of African nationalist ideologies, which set as their goal a return to the "origins of African civilization." At the political level, it suffices to recall the policy of Marshal Mobutu Sese Seko in Zaire, who was carried away by the renaming of all geographical objects bearing French names. In Angola, the Negro concept has influenced the views of the founder and leader of UNITA, Jonas Savimbi, and in Zimbabwe, the ideology of Robert Mugabe.

Soon after the liberation from colonial dependence in a number of African states, the suppression of Europeans, and indeed of all “non-natives,” began. A huge number of French settlers were forced to leave Algeria, and, being freed from French domination, many Algerians, instead of building and developing their sovereign state, preferred to emigrate to France. If in the “first wave” former colonial officials, policemen, military personnel who were guided by European culture and simply feared for their lives were leaving, the subsequent waves of migration from North Africa led to a great number of labor migrants to France, and then marginalized people parasitic and asocial lifestyle. The ideas of "racism on the contrary" came to Europe with them.

On the other hand, we should not forget about the social factors contributing to the spread of "racism, on the contrary." In France, a significant part of not only migrants, but their descendants still remains at the bottom of the social hierarchy. The absence of a normal education, qualification and profession, and often the unwillingness to do anything to change one’s social status, also has an effect. In the "ghetto" such people are comfortable - you can lead a normal life, do not work and not learn, but in every way emphasize their "otherness", the difference from the French population. Today, “white” to be in France is not fashionable. Even young people of European descent from the proletarian and lumpen-proletarian environment are trying to focus their behavior on their peers - the Arabs and Africans, adopting their behavioral patterns. Some even change religion, others are limited to just communication within the street environment. If we talk about religion, it becomes only an instrument for underlining its “other”, non-French identity.

Quite often, crimes against Europeans are committed not only out of mercenary or hooliganism, but also from “ideological” considerations. Hate based on ethnicity is added to social class hostility. That is why many French people prefer to stay away from ethnic quarters and do not advise foreign tourists - Europeans to visit them, especially at night.



Although official sources prefer to remain silent about ethnic crime, it is clear to everyone in France which environment is the most nutritious for crime. True, for the sake of justice, it is worth noting that “non-French” persons are increasingly found not only among criminals and offenders, but also among police officers. Some commit crimes, others are struggling with crime. However, in such a situation, the merging of ethnic crime with law enforcement officers is inevitable - after all, it is easier for tribesmen to find a common language with each other.

In Paris, migrants and their descendants make up at least 20% of the population. There are entire neighborhoods inhabited by representatives of specific diasporas. Here, not only the entire mosaic of the former French colonies — Algerians, Moroccans, Tunisians, Senegalese, Malians, Nigerians, Chadians, and so on — but also immigrants from China, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, India, Pakistan, Turkey, Iran — that is, the states which were never colonies of France and had nothing to do with it. But, of course, the most numerous groups come from former French possessions in North and West Africa. They deliver the most troubles to the French police and ordinary citizens. Asians are calmer and more socialized, while immigrants from African states constitute the main part of the marginal sections of the ethnic communities of Paris (and other cities in France).

The influx of migrants to France, as we know, does not stop. This circumstance, together with the very high French standards of birth rates in migrant families, contributes to the growth of the non-French population. Hence political ambitions. In turn, more and more ethnic French people are starting to sympathize with the National Front Marie Le Pen. Paradoxically, now, at the beginning of the XXI century, it was the right that turned out to be true advocates of not only the French nation as such, but also the economic interests of French employees. And if in 1980, it was possible to say that visitors compete with local residents for jobs, now they just take money from local people - after all, benefits and various benefits for migrants and refugees are formed, including, from taxes ordinary French citizens. It turns out that the French government at the expense of taxpayers provides the very marginal layers that pose a threat to public order and the taxpayers themselves. Accordingly, nationalist sentiment among the French is growing, and the migrant environment is radicalized.

Is there a solution to the existing problem? To rectify the situation, it seems, it is possible only in the case of a fundamental review of all the foundations of the internal and foreign policies of modern France. But with a president like Emmanuel Macron, with his entourage and the French political elite in its present form, this cannot be done. After all, you need a complete rejection of the multicultural model that has dominated France in the last two decades. On the other hand, the victory of nationally oriented forces will not be allowed by either the influential leftists and liberals in France, nor the United States and the European Union, which are not interested in changing the current situation.
Author:
48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. parusnik
    parusnik 1 December 2017 15: 11 New
    22
    It seems that soon the expression "See Paris and die" will have a slightly different meaning ...
    1. lexa333
      lexa333 1 December 2017 18: 46 New
      +2
      Well said.
    2. CorvusCoraks
      CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 11: 58 New
      +1
      Has long been.
  2. Chertt
    Chertt 1 December 2017 15: 25 New
    11
    There is an interesting international initiative (I don’t remember who invented it) It consists in the fact that in different cities of different countries, people wear characteristic clothes of any religious or ethnic group and so they just walk around the city, recording the reaction of others. The most extreme people in a pile and with pace go to a mosque or in Muslim clothes to a synagogue or church. In most European, civilized cities, this is impossible, or at least traumatic. This year, these actions took place in Russia ..... According to the results, the leadership of this initiative, the data decided not to publish. Since wild, non-tolerant Russia turned out to be the safest and most benevolent country
  3. solzh
    solzh 1 December 2017 16: 09 New
    +5
    The areas inhabited by migrants have become modern ghettos. It was about them that the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard wrote: “they are harnessing and robbing the very best that she can offer - cars, schools, shopping centers. Kindergartens! Exactly what we really wanted to integrate immigrants with ”

    France, thanks to the open door policy, is itself to blame.
    1. GAF
      GAF 1 December 2017 17: 38 New
      +2
      Quote: solzh
      France, thanks to the open door policy, is itself to blame.

      Not only due to politics, but also the state of minds in the heads of individuals. I remember it because of the absurdity that seemed at that time (it was 50 years ago in the 70s) the publication in Mond, in which the author on the blue eye joyfully predicted the end of Russia as such half a century later, analyzing demography in the USSR, due to the large population growth in the Central Asian republics. As the saying goes: "do not spit in the well, you will have to drink water." So they’re disentangling their “relatives” after these very half a century. By the way, unlike the author of gloating on this occasion, I do not feel because of respect for the French language and culture.
      1. minus
        minus 2 December 2017 08: 39 New
        +7
        And what ... I wrote the truth ... Take for example Norilsk or Dudinka, there will soon be no Russian-speaking population, some children of the mountains will soon be ..
    2. rkkasa xnumx
      rkkasa xnumx 2 December 2017 08: 26 New
      +4
      Quote: solzh
      France, thanks to the open door policy, is itself to blame

      Vague doubts torment me that the current situation in France (and not only in France) is the result of only a short-sighted migration policy.
      I can’t believe that people who for centuries bent down everyone they could reach — Africans, Indians, Chinese, Indians, Vietnamese, etc., suddenly took it, and just became impossibly tolerant.
      Moreover, what is characteristic is the loyalty of the leadership of European countries to migrants, at the same time combined with still tough behavior in relation to the countries from which these migrants come. Libya, Syria, Iran, etc. To Russia, by the way, too. And to Yugoslavia. In general, some kind of tolerance. And it seems thoughtful, not accidental.
      I would not be surprised if one of the goals of such a policy is:
      more and more ethnic Frenchmen begin to sympathize with the National Front of Marie Le Pen. Paradoxically, right now, at the beginning of the XNUMXst century, it was the right who turned out to be the true defenders of not only the French nation as such, but also the economic interests of the French wage earners.
      That is, these supposedly “mistakes” in migration policy, they serve as a means to increase the popularity of the right, and to divert attention from economic problems. And in Germany with Austria, as far as I know, the situation is about the same.
      1. Spook
        Spook 4 December 2017 14: 19 New
        +1
        I like your train of thought, let me share with you my opinion, dear. I also observe a lot of time (from the outside) the migration bacchanalia in the European Union and ask myself what it is. After all, the detriment of what is happening is obvious.

        There is an assumption that the destruction of the middle class is taking place, it takes too much, works too little and shakes the rights, migrants work more, the rights do not shake and generally nyashki. (The main plus of them is that they are fools, but this is for the long term).

        Our Great and Terrible, showed them his judo, and strengthened migration more than our European friends wanted (there were press reports), in honor of which the systematic destruction of the middle class, without dust and noise, turned into a noisy company, when the frog hit her want to cook and she began to twitch. Various kinds of public actions of Muslims, as well as their excessive number, led to the activation of the nationalist movement and, as a result, a popular reaction to what was happening.

        The very destruction of the middle class is the essence of the manifestation of fascist ideology in the fact that they decided to develop technology and not man. The problem at different levels of society and technology is described, for example, by the Strugatskys in the Predatory things of the century or by Stanislov Lem.

        There are 2 options here - to tighten the development of society to technology and then we get “Communism”, well, at least the absence of slavery, and slave owners do not want to lose their position and the second option comes into play:

        We omit the middle class and below the crowd of controlled commoners, and at the top the fascist technocracy, without any middle layer, it is no longer needed due to current circumstances (the Soviet Union collapsed).
        1. CorvusCoraks
          CorvusCoraks 5 December 2017 06: 04 New
          +1
          Quote: Spook
          There is an assumption that the destruction of the middle class is taking place, it takes too much, works too little and shakes the rights, migrants work more, the rights do not shake and generally nyashki. (The main plus of them is that they are fools, but this is for the long term).

          Nonsense. A significant part of migrants is getting benefits. They live off the benefits of large families, without working and producing nothing, only eating the taxes of Europeans.
          1. Spook
            Spook 5 December 2017 10: 42 New
            0
            By the way, yes, these do not work, I thought about our migrants, there are a couple of acquaintances who plow there from morning to evening. I wonder what these benefits they turn around ...
    3. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 2 December 2017 11: 10 New
      +1
      Any action gives rise to opposition. This is the Law. And the more they press, the stronger the opposition.
      The national identity of the people and their self-preservation will prevail. Already many examples in Europe itself, the International is bursting at the seams. The European Union is trying to continue by increasing the number of its members and spreading its influence throughout the world. Which, on the contrary, weakens him. And it intensifies pressure from more developed states. Seeing him as a competitor to his interests. What we see in reality with the events in Ukraine (chaos at the junction of Europe and Asia .. EU and Russia) and the organization of a massive flow of refugees into the European Union itself. .Crisis within the European Union (exit of Great Britain) .What next? The collapse of individual nation-states or the European caliphate ??? Or the EU as a single state with all the attributes of a state. (Well, who will allow it from overseas?)
      1. CorvusCoraks
        CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 12: 01 New
        0
        Quote: To be or not to be
        But many examples in Europe itself International bursting at the seams

        Not surprising. Like many things in the USSR, the international is a definition completely divorced from reality.
    4. WapentakeLokki
      WapentakeLokki 2 December 2017 18: 54 New
      0
      And who exactly is to blame? Voters who have chosen the current government, or elected parliamentarians who give up the position of the white population (by the way, who built a country where everything happens), or maybe the army and the gendarmerie are waiting for orders to end this bacchanalia but never receive clear instructions, but what exactly do the country's defenders do? recalls no? But for some reason I remember the end of the Epoch of the USSR when the people were on ... the government rotted and the army never received an order ... It's funny, but these are exactly the associations
    5. Rusfaner
      Rusfaner 5 December 2017 13: 54 New
      0
      Yes, they never feel sorry for them - they got what they wanted!
  4. Altona
    Altona 1 December 2017 16: 24 New
    11
    I call this "ethnocultural Nazism," that is, Nazism, established by the first comers in relation to the natives. This is not multiculturalism or tolerance. And the western leftists have already started playing in the “defense of the rights” of anyone and do not see the forests behind the trees.
    PS The comer should know that he has less rights, not because he is colored or Muslim, but because this state was not created by him and he has not yet paid taxes on the maintenance of this state. Therefore, I must be satisfied with the minimum (social housing, allowance, food) and start working.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 2 December 2017 09: 49 New
      +2
      Altona Yesterday, 16:24. *** PS A comer should know that he has less rights, not because he is colored or Muslim, but because this state was not created by him and he has not yet paid taxes on the maintenance of this state. Therefore, I must be satisfied with the minimum (social housing, allowance, food) and start working. *** And if this is attributed to Russia trying to integrate into the global economy and trying to bend fingers in it? Here we are scolding here European migrants. They do not want to live by the laws of Europe! But Russia wants to live according to the laws of Europe. And does not even protest against it. Russia indicate its place near the toilet. And Russia agrees with this! Maybe European migrants are right? They can be blamed for wanting to live on their necks. But! Interest Ask. And when these countries were conquered, the conquerors did not want to sit on the neck of the conquered? Another question. And when the western international bombed the countries of migrants. What was he thinking? He thought they would all stupidly take a break or go to serve the West? After all, in Russia it swept in the 90s! With the Africans snapped. Maybe you should not blame the migrants of Europe, but is it better to look at yourself? Africans and Arabs are resisting the West, Russia has fallen under the West. And still indignant: Why do not they fall under the West? And why should the command lie, should everyone execute it instantly? Why is prostitution today the norm in our country?
      1. CorvusCoraks
        CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 12: 03 New
        +2
        Quote: Region 34
        Why do not they fall under the West? And why should the command lie, should everyone execute it instantly? Why is prostitution today the norm in our country?

        Yes, for all of us, the big question is why you went to the west and why prostitution is the norm for you ...
        1. 34 region
          34 region 2 December 2017 16: 57 New
          +2
          CorvusCoraks Today, 12:03. *** Why did you go to the West and why is prostitution a norm of life for you ... *** And where are the examples of independence in Russia? Why does Russia refuse deoffshorization? Why is Russia asking for Western investment and technology? Why does Russia want to integrate into the Western world, and not the West wants to become part of Russia? Why is money exported to the West, but not imported to Russia?
      2. igorka357
        igorka357 4 December 2017 05: 23 New
        0
        If Russia lay down to the west, Russia would not already have the best strategic nuclear forces in the world, the largest territory, there would be some sort of self-defense army of the regions! There would be no sanctions, and warlike rhetoric, there would be no accusations of Russian aggression! And glory God knows that in our army and leadership, there are very few generals like you, and maybe not at all already ..
  5. captain
    captain 1 December 2017 17: 54 New
    +8
    Gentlemen, I propose to come to Stavropol. Krasnodar, Rostov and the most interesting to Moscow. And give your assessment of what you see.
  6. Altona
    Altona 1 December 2017 18: 08 New
    0
    Quote: captain
    Gentlemen, I propose to come to Stavropol. Krasnodar, Rostov and the most interesting to Moscow. And give your assessment of what you see.

    -------------------
    Are you about Caucasians? This is an ethnic mafia, fraternity simply put.
    1. Black5Raven
      Black5Raven 2 December 2017 16: 01 New
      0
      Quote: Altona
      Are you about Caucasians?

      Not only about them, he is about all the guests from Central Asia and other southern peoples.
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 4 December 2017 05: 24 New
        0
        Most of the guests sweep the streets at your place at about five in the morning ... and most of them are absolutely normal people looking for a better life!
  7. Scopolamine
    Scopolamine 1 December 2017 18: 08 New
    10
    Whites will all be destroyed. The West is a society of degeneration. alignment to the left, for the worst - the reverse side of humanism. Well, the slogan "Equality" can be realized only on the basis of the largest denominator, even mathematics confirms that equality is always the worst. Therefore, there is discrimination against the best, so that the more incapable survive. The Western philosophers wrote about this, but I confirm this fact of Western life. After all, those who come on social networks are sitting at the expense of those whom they hate so much. In Toronto, for 20 years now, at least many budget posts have not taken white men, etc., etc. In the USA, I remember the whole liberal press was happy when more than white children were born of colored children. They shouted 'Finally, there is no going back!' . So it will end all the massacres as in Rhodesia. But Russia is at hand because Western society, becoming non-white, is losing the ability to develop and innovate, that is, the competitor is being removed. I can write examples from life for a long time but many letters. The main thing is that Russia did not go the same way. The main thing is not to fall into consumption and forget that children are the future of the people. And children will not be liberal "well-wishers" will quickly bring in a replacement at your own expense.
    1. evsyukov_a
      evsyukov_a 1 December 2017 22: 46 New
      11
      "But Russia is on hand ..."
      No, dear, this is not at hand for Russia ... You don’t have to be a prophet to understand where this flock will go when it eats those who feed them ... I'm afraid the time is not far off when everyone - Europe, Russia, America will have to solve this problem together (utopia?). Here it is, your cosmopolitanism in action - for which they fought, they ran into something. You can’t drag a person from the Middle Ages and especially the primitive communal system into the ears of capitalism, for example. It is fraught.
      1. CorvusCoraks
        CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 12: 05 New
        +1
        Quote: evsyukov_a
        Here it is, your cosmopolitanism in action - for which they fought, they ran into something. You can’t drag a person from the Middle Ages and especially the primitive communal system into the ears of capitalism, for example. It is fraught.

        Yes, even in socialism is impossible !!!
        1. SPLV
          SPLV 2 December 2017 14: 29 New
          0
          Not even, much less!
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 1 December 2017 23: 25 New
      +3
      Those who reproduce faster will survive. laughing
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 4 December 2017 05: 32 New
        +1
        Are you sure? Those who have the right to shoot without warning and more weapons will survive! In nine months, you can take out a maximum of three healthy children, and imagine how many cartridges can be stamped! Black will bring Europe, oh, bring it .. spat the Germans west with the Germans their tolerance, and then all the migrants in these countries will nag in the corners! As after the attacks .. patrols went along the streets with machine guns, and had the right to open fire to kill, at the slightest disobedience, and then ... one black scum did not pull out its nose .. sat quietly like a muffled mouse! On this subject I believe in the potential of Europe, but if I make a mistake unfortunately, I am very sorry for the Europeans!
    3. To be or not to be
      To be or not to be 2 December 2017 10: 55 New
      +1
      Under global imperialism there is cheap labor and surplus value. The peculiarity is the transfer of labor from less developed countries to more developed
      and VI Lenin wrote about this: "
      Among the features of imperialism that are associated with the described range of phenomena include a decrease in emigration from imperialist countries and an increase in immigration (the arrival of workers and resettlement) to these countries from more backward countries with lower wages. "
      (Lenin V.I. Complete Works Volume 27
      IMPERIALISM AS THE HIGHEST STAGE OF CAPITALISM) .. Written in January - June 1916_))
      Imperialism is periods of peace and world wars .. "Therefore, the" inter-imperialist "or" ultra-imperialist "unions in capitalist reality, and not in the vulgar philistine imagination of the English priests or the German" Marxist "Kautsky, in whatever form these unions take shape, in the form whether one imperialist coalition against another imperialist coalition or in the form of a universal alliance of all imperialist powers is inevitably only “respite” between wars. Peaceful unions prepare wars and in turn grow out of wars, conditioning each other, giving rise to a change in the forms of peace

      and the non-peaceful struggle from the same soil of imperialist ties and the interrelations of the world economy and world politics. "
    4. CorvusCoraks
      CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 12: 04 New
      +1
      Quote: Scopolamine
      The main thing is that Russia did not go the same way. The main thing is not to fall into consumption and forget that children are the future of the people. And children will not be liberal "well-wishers" will quickly bring in a replacement at your own expense.

      Come on ... The Caucasus and Central Asia lead, under the arm with our government ...
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 4 December 2017 05: 34 New
        0
        The bandits in the Caucasus are understandable, but why didn’t the Central Asians please you, by sweeping the streets and removing snow in your place in the morning?
        1. CorvusCoraks
          CorvusCoraks 4 December 2017 10: 31 New
          0
          Quote: igorka357
          The bandits in the Caucasus are understandable, but why didn’t the Central Asians please you, by sweeping the streets and removing snow in your place in the morning?

          Drug traffic and banditry, contagious x. knows what sick illegal immigrants and much much much much more.
        2. CorvusCoraks
          CorvusCoraks 6 December 2017 04: 39 New
          0
          And I’m talking about slave occupation, I didn’t mention dumping sn and this is when there are still a lot of unemployed in the country.
  8. Nemesis
    Nemesis 1 December 2017 19: 29 New
    +9
    France is waiting for a war, and not just France, but any country hosting migrants ... Migrants do not want to live according to the laws of the countries they come to, and a guest living in a foreign country by his own laws is no longer a guest, but an occupier ...
  9. Chaos
    Chaos 1 December 2017 20: 45 New
    10
    We have no better Caucasians in all cities and there are more of them.
  10. 2ez
    2ez 1 December 2017 23: 06 New
    +2
    Five years ago, A. Burovsky read “The Burden of the Whites, or Extraordinary Racism”. I recommend, although they criticize this author! I don’t agree with everything, but here you’ll involuntarily think about it ...
    THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING !!!
  11. ROM1077
    ROM1077 2 December 2017 10: 35 New
    0
    Migrants will soon slaughter indigenous European Frenchmen and rape their women. all European countries where migrants thoughtlessly let millions of migrants wait for the same participation ... however, this can be done specifically to replace
    1. CorvusCoraks
      CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 12: 10 New
      0
      Quote: ROM1077
      Migrants will soon slaughter indigenous European Frenchmen and rape their women. all European countries where migrants thoughtlessly let millions of migrants wait for the same participation ... however, this can be done specifically to replace

      Hybrids are being bred ...
      And one more way to stupefy a population - more inclined to knowledge - is to mix white with those who have not yet climbed out of the Stone Age ...
  12. Greenwood
    Greenwood 2 December 2017 10: 56 New
    +2
    I feel that in the end, in Europe, the National Fronts, Golden Dawn, Jobbiki and other ultra-right will come to power and arrange a night of long knives for migrants.
    1. igorka357
      igorka357 4 December 2017 05: 37 New
      0
      That's it, I also wrote about this in a post ... and I will be very glad if this happens!
    2. Galleon
      Galleon 5 December 2017 14: 44 New
      +1
      You're getting excited again, Greenwood. It is likely that migrants will arrange such a night after the right-wingers have come to power, and they will arrange it more than once on New Year's Eve. Do you recall how several years in a row in France cars were burned by hundreds at night? The knife will be pulled out first by the one who is more embittered, who has nothing to lose and who is more primitive. A certain amount of intelligence is always a brake on animal hatred and rage. And there are virgin brains wrinkled with drugs, and no brakes. Yes, and more visitors, they are more united and, therefore, mobilized. Do not agree?
  13. CorvusCoraks
    CorvusCoraks 2 December 2017 11: 58 New
    +2
    In turn, more and more ethnic Frenchmen are beginning to sympathize with the National Front of Marie Le Pen. It is ironic, but now, at the beginning of the XNUMXst century, it was the right who turned out to be the true defenders of not only the French nation as such, but also the economic interests of the French wage earners.


    Nothing paradoxical. For the survival of the country and the state of the forming ethnic group, national-patriotic forces must be in power. For our country, this is no less relevant than for European states.
  14. Russian bear
    Russian bear 3 December 2017 22: 24 New
    0
    we have the same eggs side view, but instead of blacks - come from Central Asia.
  15. Comrade
    Comrade 5 December 2017 02: 38 New
    +1
    In fact, the French today are paying for the sins of their ancestors, two hundred years ago who went to the barricades to overthrow the king. Then it seemed to them that “tithing” was an awful lot, and now the time has come when they are already giving away half of their income. But not to his king, but to the visitors, such an evil irony ..
  16. Galleon
    Galleon 5 December 2017 14: 38 New
    +1
    Respect to the author for a serious analytical article!
    As for France ... No one is sorry. This Europe has already set up so many nasty things for us that I will say only one thing: S. D. D. (s) - "eat each other."
  17. Conductor
    Conductor 5 December 2017 20: 10 New
    0
    Yes, the May basis, as in 1968, will not work, the wrong French have become. When, about 3 years ago (I don’t remember exactly), supposedly veterans of a foreign legion promised they would say on a mohawk we will show where the crayfish hibernate and a bummer. August 2, they are not.