NATO: The rearmament of the armies of Russia and China is a challenge for our alliance

NATO analysts have published a report that examines the program of rearmament of the armies of the Russian Federation and China. The report was prepared by the order of the headquarters of NATO troops. The document states that "the arms buildup by Russia and China may lead to dramatically negative consequences." What do the report's authors mean by these “negative consequences”?

From the report:

We note a significant increase in the likelihood of a major interstate conflict. The buildup of armaments by Russia and China at some point may lead to the fact that these countries will throw a military challenge to the alliance.

Also in a document prepared by NATO analysts, it says that the actions of Moscow and Beijing could provoke another arms race. It is even reported that the time for which this “race” can take place: “before the 2045 of the year”.

Statements about the “militarization” of Russia and China are being made in the military bloc, in which the United States alone has a military budget several times larger than the Russian and Chinese combined. And the fact that NATO itself continues to expand eastward, bypassing all the agreements, is not considered a challenge in the alliance, but the program of rearmament of Russia, which costs tens of times less money than similar programs in the United States, is called a "threat to the alliance."

Comments

[HEATHER]

these countries will challenge the alliance. The call is thrown. You better not rock the boat. Sit still and everything will be fine. Anesthesia is a great thing for violent.

[210ox]

Our very existence is a challenge to you ..

Quote: VERESK

these countries will challenge the alliance. The call is thrown. You better not rock the boat. Sit still and everything will be fine. Anesthesia is a great thing for violent.

[Separ DNR]

the fact that NATO itself, bypassing all agreements, continues to expand eastward, is not considered a challenge in the alliance, but the Russian rearmament program, which spends tens of times less money than similar programs in the US itself, is called a “threat to the alliance”

For NATO, for NATO, for NATO they ...

[andrewkor]

There is still some OTAN!

[Separ DNR]

Quote: andrewkor

There is still some OTAN!

The same eggs, but not shaved, and in profile. To read in the rearview mirror.

[NEXUS]

Quote: 210ox

Our very existence is a challenge to you ..

Right. And it did not start yesterday. From time immemorial, the worst enemies of the Slavs were the Anglo-Saxons. It is enough to look at what the Anglo-Saxons did with Yugoslavia, Serbia, Bulgaria, Ukraine, and so on.
This confrontation of cultures and civilizations is not one hundred years old. And it does not stop for a second.

[Herculesic]

I recall how years ago our government was seriously considering the option of Russia's entry into NATO! What would be left of our country now if we really got into NATO? ??????

[Separ DNR]

Quote: Herkulesich

I recall how years ago our government was seriously considering the option of Russia's entry into NATO!

As the comedian Galkin said, on behalf of Chernomyrdin:

And they are a new member, and we are pleased ...

[Uncle lee]

The rearmament of the armies of Russia and China is a challenge for our alliance

Replacing PCA with AK is already a threat! And if Armata replaced the T-34 - this is generally a defeat of the Nata!

[Jedi]

The rearmament of the armies of Russia and China is a challenge for our alliance

Of course, a challenge. And then they are used to the Papuans, who have only karamultuki, to have a business. Here you are not here!

The document, prepared by NATO analysts, also says that the actions of Moscow and Beijing could provoke another arms race.

This is finally the finish: they themselves sleep and see a new arms race, but blame Russia and China. The USA is true to itself.

[iliitchitch]

A bunch of pid..ov. Around the threat behind.

[Alexander 3]

The end of the lawlessness that Western Europe created with the hegemon. But they won’t calmly amicably. They must step on the Faberge.

[bald]

And sometime, from the states, the arms race stopped ?! - It has existed since the inception of this "peace-loving" state. They are already choking on their own bile.

[Holsten]

The arms race has been going on since the Stone Age - it would be naive to talk about its possible cessation.

[rotmistr60]

We note a significant increase in the likelihood of a major interstate conflict.

Here is hypocrisy, so hypocrisy. If the United States does not start such a conflict and pokes its green nose into the affairs of other countries, then there will be no conflict. All their satellites have already been intimidated by their stubborn stupidity.

[andrewkor]

Except for the United States, the rest of NATO is in a deep ... crisis!

[Esoteric]

NATO: The rearmament of the armies of Russia and China is a challenge for our alliance

Come on!!! This is a phone call for NATO. Reminder about:

When Moscow speaks, it must be heard ...
A call is sent to you from the DPRK ...

[DEDPIHTO]

Quote: Alexander 3

The end of the lawlessness that Western Europe created with the hegemon. But they won’t calmly amicably. They must step on the Faberge.

Yes, who will advance? The same capitalists are in power and the arms race is beneficial for both of them, on the same field of berries. Although ... it is even more profitable to start a war for them. In 2 world wars, the capitalists on each side (except for the USSR in the Great Patriotic War) multiplied well the conditions on military orders , but dying on the battlefield and hunching simple people at their factories. There is something to think about ... here the Guarantor has already announced the need to put the country on a war footing.

[rocket757]

It is of course, the wars are mostly imperialist, on the one hand it’s for sure ... and on the other, everything needs to be defended because the capitalist is ready to eat each other.
The eternal dilemma - bar quarrels among peasants forelocks crack !!!
and where is the solution? The country of councils declared a peace-loving policy, but in addition to defending itself and chopping off a neighbor, which, as they say, was vital. identity too !!!
That’s such a lump. There is no peace on the planet, and if you want to live in peace, you have to prepare for war.
I'm not trying for our power, they are capitalists / rich and care primarily about their loved ones, trying to consider the problem from different angles.
Schaub everything was smooth, it doesn’t work. the bias is going in some direction.

[DEDPIHTO]

Quote: rocket757

It is of course, the wars are mostly imperialist, on the one hand it’s for sure ... and on the other, everything needs to be defended because the capitalist is ready to eat each other.
The eternal dilemma - bar quarrels among peasants forelocks crack !!!

Dillem was already resolved 100 years ago

[rocket757]

Well, yes, yes, but now there are no barracks or the peasants have shaved off their foreheads.
More sophisticated, subtle present all began, but in fact nothing and how has not changed.
They all directly believed that the Yankees everywhere carry freedom and democracy ... or are our bars worried only about Russians and other brothers ??? Geopolitical, strategic interests at that ???

One hundred years ago there was an attempt or experiment to create a more just society ... for a while it was interrupted, but something he really proved. What, it’s up to you to decide. In the meantime, everything has returned to normal and the forelocks among the peasants will still crack ... I can’t imagine how much.

[prior]

"The rearmament of the armies of Russia and China is a challenge for our alliance"
We would sit on the priest exactly, would not climb into the Baltic states and other Serbia-Syria, no one would call you.

[Zomanus]

No, well, NATO is rightly saying.
It threatens interests in terms of the seizure of new territories.
So from this point is absolutely correct.
A robber can also speak about a citizen,
buying a means of self-defense.
There is also a threat to the plans.