The Committee of the Council of the Federation recommended approval of the draft budget of the security forces

38
The Council of the Federation Committee on Defense and Security recommended approval of the draft budget of the military and other security agencies for 2018 a year, as well as for the planning period of 2019-2020, reports TASS.

The Committee of the Council of the Federation recommended approval of the draft budget of the security forces


The project was heard by members of the committee on Tuesday, as a result of which a unanimous decision was made to recommend to the Federation Council to approve the document.

The agency also brought the main parameters of the federal budget.

“According to the law on the federal budget, revenues of the Russian Federation in 2018 will be 15,26 trillion. rub., in 2019 year - 15,55 trillion. rub., in 2020 year - 16,3 trillion. rub. Costs are planned at 16,53 trillion. rub. in the 2018 year, 16,4 trillion rub. in the 2019 year and 17,155 trillion rub. in the 2020 year, ”the article says.

Thus, the federal budget deficit in 2018 year will be about 1,3 trillion. rubles, in 2019 year - 819,1 billion rubles., in 2020 year - 870 billion rubles.

The law also laid down the transition from 2018 to the new budget rule. It implies that additional revenues from the sale of oil received from the price above the set bar will not be spent on expenses, but in reserves. The base price for Urals oil is set at 40 dollars per barrel in current year prices and is subject to annual indexation of 2% from the 2018 year.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    29 November 2017 16: 13
    Is there an “entire” budget in the box? .. laughingOnce in similar boxes Chubais and Co. carried banknotes ...
    1. +5
      29 November 2017 16: 20
      In the boxes there is the legalized pumping of our natural resources to zero, Ross-rosy, yachts, cottages Khrushchev’s height, and reluctance to really change something.
      1. +7
        29 November 2017 16: 44
        Quote: 210ox
        Is there an “entire” budget in the box? .. laughingOnce in similar boxes Chubais and Co. carried banknotes ...


        He had it from under the copier, but here so much paper is being translated, it's time in electronic form.
      2. +2
        29 November 2017 18: 31
        Each of the deputies of the Soviet department has the status of a minister with all the gadgets. Of course, it’s better to move all this hackneyed bunch to the regions of the far north, having previously confiscated all the money stolen from the people, which by the way for a couple of annual bucket bucks. Here are the well-kept keeper of the kerimka landed. We can only rely on import justice, it is better, of course, on Chinese, and they have a lot of rounds.
    2. +2
      29 November 2017 16: 32
      One "approver" from the Federation Council French cops tied in Paris for fraud with real estate. A bit from work over the hill was gone, and on you! belay Well, approved and approved. Or did someone doubt to applaud them? request
  2. +7
    29 November 2017 16: 17
    That is, no one will really engage in economics for at least a couple of years, they will prove to us that nothing is better than selling natural resources, that our future is the complete pumping of oil and gas from the soil, and let the Chinese build machines? You will regret a million times that you cannot resurrect Joseph Vissarionovich. ...
    1. +2
      29 November 2017 16: 38
      In the context of the topic "The Committee of the Council of the Federation recommended approving the draft budget of the security forces", I suddenly remembered an old joke:
      - The miners went on strike!
      - Give salaries to the miners!
      - Strikers!
      - Give salaries to readers!
      - The collective farmers went on strike!
      - Give salaries to collective farmers!
      - At the same time, miners, exporters and collective farmers went on strike!
      - Give salary OMOHy!

      God forbid, of course!
      1. +9
        29 November 2017 16: 45
        Thank God we survived this period.
        1. +3
          29 November 2017 17: 29
          :-) Are you so sure about this? And for me, everything goes to this again.
          1. +11
            29 November 2017 17: 32
            What is this expressed and what are your arguments?
            1. +3
              29 November 2017 17: 35
              My arguments are simple: reorganizing the police into the police, joining it in the structure of the Russian Guard, increasing their salaries, securing special equipment for them, and reporting directly to higher structures. Why do you think this is done?
              1. +10
                29 November 2017 17: 51
                I asked you about the economy, but I’ll answer you - we have the presidential election soon and not only politicians and voters are preparing for this event, but our “partners” are pouring huge funds into the fifth column to try to break up Russia, through the Russian Maidan. There is much more to come.
                1. +3
                  29 November 2017 17: 55
                  It is possible about the economy: delays with salaries are growing, industrial production is so miserable, it decreases even more, small business catastrophically closes, etc. Do not "talk nonsense" about our external partners, whom the authorities and oligarchs are afraid of, internal enemies are afraid of them :-) Agitprop from Solovyov, Pushkov and others like him, except for you of course ;-), is no longer valid
                  1. +11
                    29 November 2017 18: 07
                    I understand you, you are an all-rounder, but regarding the listed gentlemen, this is not for me, I have my own head on my shoulders. Yes, there are many problems, business is not nightmare for you to argue with, but we don’t need revolutions, we’ll figure it out differently.
                    1. +1
                      29 November 2017 18: 21
                      :-) That is, you don’t have any arguments that everything is fine in our economy! So, we’ll write down the usual shortcut. Sorry, but you are not able to figure it out, with all due respect to you
                      1. +10
                        29 November 2017 18: 31
                        Have you read my post? laughing , no need to draw such conclusions, you can get into trouble. hi
          2. +2
            30 November 2017 02: 32
            Quote: andrej-shironov
            :-) Are you so sure about this? And for me, everything goes to this again.

            the fact of the matter is that it is only "according to you" !!! wink wink laughing laughing laughing
            1. 0
              30 November 2017 09: 55
              wink Of course for me. Unlike some, I live with my eyes open and I’m not close to the body or the pipe.
  3. +2
    29 November 2017 16: 43
    Right, I support. They know better than ours there, because we are not told everything.
    Moreover, before the war, security forces need to raise their salaries.
  4. +4
    29 November 2017 16: 48
    Quote: Herkulesich
    You will regret a million times that you cannot resurrect Joseph Vissarionovich. ...

    Joseph Vissarionovich was still humane, Bandera, Westerners and liberals (enemies of the people!) Did not knock everyone out. With the current kagal, it is tougher to “the seventh generation”, so that there would be no memory left.
    1. 0
      29 November 2017 17: 32
      Well, so also Peter the Great and Ivan the Terrible to help him! am So to speak, the historical troika cleans the country from liberties and other undead!
  5. +2
    29 November 2017 17: 24
    And the advice of the federation is also not childishly afraid! But of course, not external enemies, but internal ones :-)
  6. +1
    29 November 2017 18: 15
    new budget rule. It implies that additional income from the sale of oil received from a price higher than the established level will not be allocated to expenses, but to reserves.

    Americans know their business tightly, the third column in power works like a clock!
    Why not create a development budget, not allocate additional funds for infrastructure projects. We will again sulk at Siemens, will close oil fields due to lack of technology, will we again beg to invest in Russia?
    But who will invest in us if we drive our own money abroad !!!
  7. +1
    29 November 2017 18: 37
    Quote: Going
    Have you read my post? laughing , no need to draw such conclusions, you can get into trouble. hi

    wink Opachki, another merged and disabled answers to his comments. I’ll write you on a par with Petrov. As I said, you are not even able to change anything with Petrov. You can’t even argue the argument. hi
  8. +2
    29 November 2017 20: 04
    People, that you are like little children! Do you have enough of Libya? What did Gaddafi do in the country? And only a few thousand freaks who raised the states killed him! But M. Gaddafi was warned, but he hoped for the people! Moral ---- hope for the people, And do not forget about the power structures! But he had many weapons of ours and many supporters AND WHAT? Is a few thousand drug addicts and the fifth column the people?
    1. +1
      29 November 2017 22: 50
      Correct, if I am mistaken ... Do you say that modern Russia has only two options: either a raw-material oligarchy with Vladimir Vladimirovich associates at the head, or a civil war, devastation, the intervention of evil Yankees and other horrors? And what, do you refuse us the right to build a modern state with replaceable responsible elective power? Oh, thanks...
      1. +3
        30 November 2017 02: 36
        Quote: Anyone
        modern state with replaceable responsible elected authority

        not to you, liberals, to broadcast .. you have already steered !! wassat wassat wassat negative negative negative go to bed with your theses about "turnover", like small children !!! laughing laughing laughing
  9. +2
    29 November 2017 22: 46
    Quote: andrej-shironov
    My arguments are simple: reorganizing the police into the police, joining it in the structure of the Russian Guard, increasing their salaries, securing special equipment for them, and reporting directly to higher structures. Why do you think this is done?

    Counter-arguments: The so-called "reorganization" is actually a banal reduction of about a third, which everyone in the country has really felt. Along the way, renaming is for dust in the eyes. Only the SOBR-OMON and other special forces, private security agencies and LRR were transferred to the structure of the Russian Guard. This is from the police. The internal troops themselves were very independent in the structure of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. So instead of one full-fledged Ministry of Internal Affairs, they received two stumps with additional problems in the interaction between them. Fixing special equipment I can’t even comment on the complete abstractness of the statement. But about the increase in salaries - they haven’t been raised by five for all the siloviki !!! years old.
    1. 0
      29 November 2017 23: 16
      Yes, drop it! We have three times more police officers per capita than in the USA, and than in the USSR under Stalin. Although the crime rate, according to the media, is steadily declining. And all this without taking into account the notorious Rosguard.
      1. +4
        29 November 2017 23: 19
        Figures in the studio! Do not forget to add to the USA and the National Guard, which can be attracted (and is involved) to resolve internal conflicts. And she has heavy weapons!
        1. +2
          29 November 2017 23: 43
          A list of countries by police numbers is on Wikipedia. Cope with the search? Purely the police (people per 100000 of the population) surpasses the American twice. This is without taking into account the Russian Guard.
          No need to add the United States National Guard. They are not full-time units and do not receive payment for their work - they are actually just reservists. Service in NG USA is voluntary and combined with work in the main specialty.
          Russia's double superiority in police + Rosguard = three times more "law enforcement" in Russia than in the United States.

          Now the USSR ... In total, on May 15, 1953, 1,095 thousand people were in the organs and troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Today, ~ 1,325 thousand people work in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. At the same time, in the USSR in 1953 ~ 192 million people lived, in Russia ~ 150 million. The difference coefficient is 1,28. We multiply 1,325 million by this coefficient and get 1 million 696 thousand people. The difference in the number of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs between the Stalinist USSR and modern Russia will be 601 thousand people. As a percentage, count yourself.
          According to the special services ... "the number of the FSB is classified. According to scattered data, it ranges from 80 to 120 thousand people, not counting the border service. Together with them, it exceeds 200 thousand people. The number of employees of the Foreign Intelligence Service is secret, according to various estimates, together with agents it amounts to 20 thousand people. The number of FSO is also classified, although in the media they call figures from 10 thousand to 25 thousand people "
          Even taking into account that the number of special services is exaggerated here, it is still many times more than the number of state security bodies of the USSR in 1954, which amounted to less than 80 thousand people.
          1. +4
            30 November 2017 01: 49
            First, refer to Wikipedia as a source ... Are you not Richard McLaren?
            Well, if the FSB and the Foreign Intelligence Service, then drag in the Americans from the famous "17 special services", which give a tooth for Russian hackers. And in contrast to the FSO, you can enroll the US Treasury - he is involved in security.
            1. 0
              30 November 2017 12: 14
              Can you challenge the numbers above from Wikipedia? No? Then why moan about Wikipedia's unreliability? Ready to look at sources you trust. Introduce them.
          2. +3
            30 November 2017 02: 50
            Quote: Anyone
            A list of countries by police numbers is on Wikipedia. Cope with the search? Purely the police (people per 100000 of the population) surpasses the American twice. This is without taking into account the Russian Guard.
            No need to add the United States National Guard. They are not full-time units and do not receive payment for their work - they are actually just reservists. Service in NG USA is voluntary and combined with work in the main specialty.
            Russia's double superiority in police + Rosguard = three times more "law enforcement" in Russia than in the United States.

            Now the USSR ... In total, on May 15, 1953, 1,095 thousand people were in the organs and troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Today, ~ 1,325 thousand people work in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. At the same time, in the USSR in 1953 ~ 192 million people lived, in Russia ~ 150 million. The difference coefficient is 1,28. We multiply 1,325 million by this coefficient and get 1 million 696 thousand people. The difference in the number of employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs between the Stalinist USSR and modern Russia will be 601 thousand people. As a percentage, count yourself.
            According to the special services ... "the number of the FSB is classified. According to scattered data, it ranges from 80 to 120 thousand people, not counting the border service. Together with them, it exceeds 200 thousand people. The number of employees of the Foreign Intelligence Service is secret, according to various estimates, together with agents it amounts to 20 thousand people. The number of FSO is also classified, although in the media they call figures from 10 thousand to 25 thousand people "
            Even taking into account that the number of special services is exaggerated here, it is still many times more than the number of state security bodies of the USSR in 1954, which amounted to less than 80 thousand people.


            The fact that Russia is supposedly the "most police" country in the world - both the Western and Russian liberal media have been feeding their audiences for many years. Full ratings, while almost no one ever published, getting off with infographics with photos of overly full Russian traffic cops and swayed American cops.

            Bloomberg's "experts" acted elementarily. They took from the Internet the total number of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, which is about 80% of all law enforcement agencies in the country, and including internal troops, and compared it with the estimated number of only "local" police in the United States. The correctness of this comparison in view of all of the above - I think there is no need to comment. wink Yes Yes laughing laughing


            http://politrussia.com/society/rossiya-politseysk
            aya-304 /
            1. 0
              30 November 2017 12: 42
              Do not make people laugh. Read “Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 13.07.2015, 356 No. 5“ On Amending the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of May 2014, 300 No. XNUMX “On Certain Issues of the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation”. The number of the Ministry of Internal Affairs is indicated there (without auxiliary personnel and the Russian Guard).
              And the question is not in the absolute number of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, but in the effectiveness of the police. In fact, the main function of the police should be to protect the health, life and property of citizens. And our police are traditionally not engaged in protecting citizens, but in a kind of "fight against crime." At the same time, crime clearly wins, if you look at the data of the State Statistics Committee and the Ministry of Internal Affairs (not Wiki, if you insist). In 1991, about 2,1 million crimes were recorded, and in 2015, 2,4 million.
              I am not at all against strengthening the police. But not by those means and not with such a result as is happening today. Nothing changes for citizens - only the "law enforcement" of the diverse have more to keep. Previously, the cops were rude on the phone and drove an hour to call. Now the police have a polite call center and also do not come to the call for an hour. And if there is no difference ...))
        2. +4
          30 November 2017 02: 37
          Quote: faterdom
          Figures in the studio! Do not forget to add to the USA and the National Guard, which can be attracted (and is involved) to resolve internal conflicts. And she has heavy weapons!

          like Well, the National Guard of Negroes muddied in Ferguson ??? winked winked lol lol lol
  10. 0
    30 November 2017 11: 59
    And pay attention to the case of Gaidar, Chubais, Kudrin lives!
    The law also laid down the transition from 2018 to a new budget rule. It implies that additional income from the sale of oil received from a price higher than the established level will not be allocated to expenses, but to reserves.

    We continue to support the US economy, and our economy, in the opinion of our bogalers, we do not need
  11. 0
    30 November 2017 12: 11
    Quote: Nikolai Grek
    Quote: Anyone
    modern state with replaceable responsible elected authority

    not to you, liberals, to broadcast .. you have already steered !! wassat wassat wassat negative negative negative go to bed with your theses about "turnover", like small children !!! laughing laughing laughing

    ABOUT! TagManager ™ drew! My political preferences are at your discretion, mon sher. The main thing is that you feel psychologically comfortable during the discussion. I am a customer-oriented interlocutor))