Military Review

US: US contingent will remain in Syria after the victory over terrorists

64
American edition The Washington Post comes out with a publication about the plans of the United States in Syria. In particular, it is noted that Washington plans to extend its military presence on Syrian territory even after the Islamic State grouping (* banned in Russia) is completely defeated.


It is noted that the United States will continue to actively support the so-called Syrian democratic forces, consisting mainly of Kurds.

US: US contingent will remain in Syria after the victory over terrorists


The newspaper also notes that the complete withdrawal of the American contingent "will guarantee the political survival of Bashar Assad as president of Syria." And this, as stated, "will mark the victory of Iran," with harsh criticism of which, and the representatives of the United States.

Thus, in the States, despite all the statements by President Trump and individual representatives of his entourage, they emphasize that the final goal of the United States in Syria is precisely to remove President Al-Assad from his post. All other statements that the United States came to Syria to fight terrorism, are not worth a jigger.

WP notes that the US military contingent, which will remain in Syria after the defeat of ISIS (*), "will be able to guarantee a change of power in the country." Also stated that the US military presence in Syria "will force Assad to make concessions in relation to the Syrian opposition." Is this the one that cuts off the heads of children? ..
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Herculesic
    Herculesic 23 November 2017 06: 33
    21
    Then they need to build Vietnam 2 in Syria, and kick them out of there by force of arms! !! am They are not just strangers there, they are enemies there to the people of Syria.
    1. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 23 November 2017 06: 42
      +9
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Then they need to build Vietnam 2 in Syria, and kick them out of there by force of arms! !! am They are not just strangers there, they are enemies there to the people of Syria.

      "Vietnam" as I understand it should the Kurds do? It is on the territory of the Kurds that there are American bases and contingents,
      1. Anarchist
        Anarchist 23 November 2017 06: 47
        19
        Aron, a man on emotions, does not understand himself that he blurted out!
        For Kurds, the presence of Americans is the only way to bargain for themselves wide autonomy ...
        1. Vladimir16
          Vladimir16 23 November 2017 07: 23
          14
          Quote: Aron Zaavi
          "Vietnam" as I understand it should the Kurds do?

          Jews of course!
          No Kurdish territory. There is a territory of Syria. Mattresses are the same occupiers in Syria as the Jews.
          Whose cow would mumble, and yours would be silent.
          1. Aaron Zawi
            Aaron Zawi 23 November 2017 07: 34
            +4
            Quote: Vladimir16

            Jews of course!
            No Kurdish territory. There is a territory of Syria. Mattresses are the same occupiers in Syria as the Jews.
            Whose cow would mumble, and yours would be silent.

            I do not argue that the Americans are on Syrian territory. Even they do not argue with that. The only question is whether the Kurds want to organize a guerrilla war for the Americans? Or do you send troops from Arabs to the Kurdish region?
          2. Viktorfi
            Viktorfi 23 November 2017 08: 49
            +2
            Quote: Vladimir16
            Mattresses are the same occupiers in Syria as the Jews.


            Well, yes, of course, and Papa Assad seized power and transferred it to his son, whom no one chose. The Alawites, of which 10% and headed by Assad, continued the occupation of Syria, which his father began - having seized power, deprived people of the right to a fair trial, freedom of choice and much more.
            1. dr.mel51
              dr.mel51 23 November 2017 09: 55
              +3
              you tell the saudis
              1. Viktorfi
                Viktorfi 23 November 2017 10: 11
                +1
                Quote: dr.mel51
                you tell the saudis


                Tell them yourself, you are now in very good relations with them, go to visit each other, sign military contracts, and cooperate in the military sphere ..
                1. dr.mel51
                  dr.mel51 24 November 2017 18: 04
                  0
                  while they basically come to us we only expose the equipment in front of them
                  and yes, when a cockerel bites into ***** they will come running, but so far only secret negotiations are being conducted with you.
            2. donavi49
              donavi49 23 November 2017 10: 04
              +1
              And here comes HTS or TIP - so they will immediately heal laughing . Alawites and Shiites into slavery. The necessary flow of Sunnis to leadership positions. Medieval laws. Medieval economy adjusted for oil and weapons.

              Kadafka was thrown off. It just got worse.
              1. Viktorfi
                Viktorfi 23 November 2017 10: 20
                +1
                Quote: donavi49
                Alawites and Shiites into slavery. The necessary flow of Sunnis to leadership positions. Medieval laws.


                This is ridiculous. No one talks about a ban on the Alawites, but there was a ban on the Sunnis occupying high posts, etc. Like a bunch of other prohibitions, they were imprisoned, the whole press is controlled, there is no freedom of speech.

                It's about the possibility of the people of Syria to choose a ruler. If 75% of the Sunnis live there, then it won’t be surprising that the Sunnis will democratically choose the Sunni. And the Alawites will be a minority in the country, which will be represented in the government and everywhere.


                Quote: donavi49
                Kadafka was thrown off. As it only got worse


                It got worse because there was no alternative to him; he was removed, and the new government could not quickly restore power and take control of the country. There is an alternative in Syria. The Syrian people have the right to choose their own ruler and should be given such an opportunity.
                1. donavi49
                  donavi49 23 November 2017 10: 26
                  +4
                  Which alternative? Names! Only without abstract leaders.

                  There are two features of local democracy. They vote for their own people (as in Iraq - Shiites voted for Shiites = Shiites stupidly more = Shiite government and Shiite opposition with a small interspersing of Sunnis).

                  Who has more guns, guys and military glory - he is more authoritative.

                  The result or which thread is the Tiger, or again HTS / TYPE. Ahrark surrendered very much. Jays - left the arena altogether.
        2. Orionvit
          Orionvit 23 November 2017 08: 13
          10
          Quote: Anarchist
          For Kurds, the presence of Americans is the only way to bargain for themselves broad autonomy.

          Everyone who bargained for themselves from the Amers (in the broad sense of the West), either finished poorly. All Western "nishtyaki" smell bad, and in the end turn out to be problems. If the Kurds still do not understand this, then purely humanly, they are simply a pity.
      2. Topotun
        Topotun 23 November 2017 09: 01
        +1
        That's just Turkey so joyfully tuned in to the new "soldiers" of the Americans.
      3. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 23 November 2017 09: 56
        0
        You are pavas, but the Kurds are not the force that will overthrow Assad.
    2. Titsen
      Titsen 23 November 2017 06: 47
      +7
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Then they need to build Vietnam 2 in Syria, and kick them out of there by force of arms! !! They are not just strangers there, they are enemies there to the people of Syria.


      Another couch expert?

      Who will suit your Vietnam 2 for mattresses?

      This ur-patriotism is already sick of it!

      And your proposal looks like a provocation!

      Swipe, pancreas, the other way.
      1. Herculesic
        Herculesic 23 November 2017 07: 02
        +5
        I am Rostovchanin: fool ! This is, firstly, and secondly, the Syrian army must clear ALL of its land SAMA from any uninvited troops, such as the Yankees and Turks! !! There only we are on legal failures! !!!! am
        1. Anarchist
          Anarchist 23 November 2017 07: 16
          13
          Released already! Almost to the complete collapse of Syria itself ...
          And the fact that you are from Rostov does not give you the right to bear “nonsense”! Only a certificate from a psychiatrist! fool
          1. GRF
            GRF 23 November 2017 07: 24
            +6
            Quote: Anarchist
            Released already! Almost to the complete collapse of Syria itself ...
            And the fact that you are from Rostov does not give you the right to bear “nonsense”! Only a certificate from a psychiatrist! fool

            Oh yeah...
            But how dare the Americans from Syria call to expel ???

            Pysy: I’m carrying nonsense legally! There is help, I want to draw you ...
          2. Vladimir16
            Vladimir16 23 November 2017 07: 26
            +7
            Quote: Anarchist
            And the fact that you are from Rostov does not give you the right to bear “nonsense”! Only a certificate from a psychiatrist!

            Do you see nonsense in the proposal to the Syrians to independently solve the territorial issue?
            Sir, you look in the mirror.
            Herculesych said what everyone has in their tongue.
            If the Syrians cannot independently control their country, then the state is worthless. They are being helped by Russians and Iranians. What else is needed?
            You, sir, as you see the mattresses, they are so immediately ready to go liquid for themselves, but blame Herculesych for this.
            Quote: Titsen
            This ur-patriotism is already sick of it!

            Titsen, are you fed up with the call on the Syrians to defend their homeland? Are you also a mattress pad? Or maybe you’ll go to Syria and throw out mattresses yourself from there? Or do you think that mattresses are there for world peace?
            1. Anarchist
              Anarchist 23 November 2017 07: 39
              10
              Quote: Vladimir16
              Sir, you look in the mirror.

              You will not be there!
              Quote: Herkulesich
              Then they need to build Vietnam 2 in Syria, and kick them out of there by force of arms! !!

              Is this probably a smart thing? This is not Achinea ?! Everyone understands that neither Iran nor Syria can do this!
              Quote: Vladimir16
              Herculesych said what everyone has in their tongue.

              On everyone’s lips - “to arrange a nuclear explosion in Washington”! Is it smart to do this ...? I look at things objectively, and not scream Ur at every opportunity ...
              Quote: Vladimir16
              You, sir, as you see the mattresses, they are so immediately ready to go liquid for themselves, but blame Herculesych for this

              I did not blame him! And I ask you not to judge by yourself ...
              Do not confuse patriotism with utopianism! Dreams are good, of course, but excessive optimism is just a lack of information ...
            2. Phoenix_L'vov
              Phoenix_L'vov 23 November 2017 09: 46
              +1
              Vladimir16, do you really think that all countries that are in opposition to the States are weaker than them and cannot defend their border from attacks by American proxies are "worthless"?
              Whose mill are you pouring water on?
              And by the way, how's the weather in Washington now?
          3. The comment was deleted.
            1. Anarchist
              Anarchist 23 November 2017 07: 55
              12
              The lack of help does not symbolize the presence of the mind! On the topic have something to say? Not a word in fact ...!
              1. Separ DNR
                Separ DNR 23 November 2017 08: 18
                +3
                The American contingent will remain in Syria after the victory over the terrorists

                Here it is ... If not the "moment of truth", then the statement preceding it ...

                But he already wrote in the comments that the PROBLEM ... First of all, for Syria, and of course Russia, which to some extent took responsibility for it and has (?) Some claims to leadership in the region.

                Eleven (!) American bases (if I am not mistaken) in Syria “suddenly materialized” with the inaction and connivance of the Russian Federation.

                Darkness!


                It remains only to wait for the United States to settle thoroughly still in the "independent" ... With eleven (one hundred and eleven ???) bases.

                So, obviously, looks like "geopolitical Feng Shui"? belay

                But what is it, brothers, you are such a clumsy policy, you are driving yourself into a corner?
                1. Topotun
                  Topotun 23 November 2017 09: 16
                  +1
                  "Eleven (!) American bases (if I am not mistaken) in Syria" suddenly materialized "with the inaction and connivance of the Russian Federation."
                  Do you propose unleashing the Third World War? Syria has already turned to Russia with a request to close ALL of the country's airspace from the "left" flyers. How do you think we will fulfill this request? Let's begin to bring down Americans, French and other shobla? Actually, this is already a hot phase of a serious world war ....
                  1. Waterfowl
                    Waterfowl 23 November 2017 09: 40
                    +2
                    Exactly! Let's start felling the whole shobla. Why be afraid of having no analogues in the world of air defense systems. Third World Shy Scare!
                    Do you propose to be content with the fact that the amyricos use the fruits of the Russian Aerospace Forces?
                    1. Topotun
                      Topotun 23 November 2017 10: 33
                      +1
                      Quote: Waterfowl
                      Exactly! Let's start felling the whole shobla. Why be afraid of having no analogues in the world of air defense systems. Third World Shy Scare!
                      Do you propose to be content with the fact that the amyricos use the fruits of the Russian Aerospace Forces?

                      Sorry, but who told you that even if our air defense systems have no analogues in the world, then these systems are enough to global deter NATO forces?
                      Do you know how much one 48N6E missile costs for the S-300 air defense system, is the old complex enough? If the media do not lie, about 1 million rubles. Now multiply this by at least 1000? (launch is usually carried out in two or three missiles for one target for guaranteed interception of targets. Let there be about 300 units of targets, although with intensive databases there will be much more). Sorry, but are you sure that our economy will pull even a relatively limited war? Of course, it’s limited to the Middle East when it’s not about Russia’s territory and it’s not necessary to throw ALL resources into the furnace of war.
                      1. region58
                        region58 23 November 2017 21: 14
                        0
                        Quote: Topotun
                        If the media do not lie, about 1 million rubles. Now multiply this by at least 1000?

                        1. They (missiles) still need to be delivered there. And it can also be oh how difficult, and therefore not cheap.
                        2. Where to get them in such quantity? First you need to produce so much. They will not expose air defense in Russia.
    3. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 23 November 2017 09: 18
      +1
      Quote: Herkulesich
      Then they need to build Vietnam 2 in Syria, and kick them out of there by force of arms! !! They are not just strangers there, they are enemies there to the people of Syria.

      It will be so along the way. Shiite Iraqi rebels from Hashd al-Shaabi made a statement yesterday that they would kill the Americans if they did not leave Iraq. In Syria, even more so, they are not welcome. The Kurds began to strongly doubt the United States when they could not stop Iraq, which after the referendum knocked out the Kurds from Kirkuk. So the mattresses will have to dig in Jordan.
      1. Asthma
        Asthma 23 November 2017 11: 45
        0
        and how do you think this will all happen? there will be a couple of two hundredth in ov they are whitened!
        1. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 23 November 2017 13: 18
          +1
          Quote: Asthma
          and how do you think this will all happen? there will be a couple of two hundredth in ov they are whitened!

          Nothing can be ruled out. If they will pinch a sniper, or wage high-explosions on the way, then to whom will they demonstrate a "power"? The chicken pecking the grain.
          1. Asthma
            Asthma 23 November 2017 17: 39
            +1
            after a moment of reflection, I realized that this is a "completely" safe development of events for certain forces in Syria. thanks for the idea.
  3. Vadim Zhivov
    Vadim Zhivov 23 November 2017 06: 33
    +2
    Opposition will be supported by military presence .. How is it in American .. negative
    1. 210ox
      210ox 23 November 2017 06: 35
      0
      Well, maybe they want a good kick ..
      1. Polite Moose
        Polite Moose 23 November 2017 07: 29
        0
        Quote: 210ox
        Well, maybe they want a good kick ..

        Well, they want it - it’s unlikely. But they deserve it - that's for sure. The only question is where, how and from whom? Significant losses among l / s can force anyone to leave, but in the desert Vietnam 2.0 will be problematic to organize. The jungle is not so thick. Yes, and the experience of a long stay in the territory with a hostile population among the n-owls is available. The SAA will not be able to fight openly with them. Only the diplomatic path remains.
        1. Orionvit
          Orionvit 23 November 2017 08: 19
          0
          Quote: Polite Elk
          Vietnam 2.0 to organize will be problematic

          That's for sure. In a military spirit, little Vietnamese are head and shoulders above all Arabs.
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 23 November 2017 06: 38
    +2
    It’s time to equip the Assad border in full, then the habitat for the skunks will disappear. Let grandmas look.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 23 November 2017 06: 38
    +1
    “Will be able to guarantee a change of power in the country”

    So the war (now partisan) will continue. Obstinate Americans will by all means seek the elimination of Assad to advance their protege, who, in their opinion, will give Syria to America.
    1. Going
      Going 23 November 2017 08: 59
      +9
      Assad is a tool for exhausting Russia, and now they are hooked on it for just that.
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 23 November 2017 06: 40
    0
    Stripes cannot play ... it's in their blood. So bring up. From birth.
    But they can "row over the wort" for such art! Play the Kurdish card in BV? It is only from despair.
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 23 November 2017 08: 22
      0
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Stripes cannot play ... it's in their blood.

      Very able to. Here are just concepts such as "loss" and "victory", in their understanding is somewhat different from ours. They have such a concept as "profit", and the rest can be called as anyone wants.
  7. K-50
    K-50 23 November 2017 06: 44
    +1
    Washington plans to extend its military presence on Syrian territory even after the Islamic State group is completely defeated

    Yes, who would doubt it. Controlled “doggies” Kurds have seized oil fields and, under the protection of the shitiest army, they will pump oil uncontrollably enriching their “roofers”.
    They don’t care about international agreements and norms, because they had never respected a pin before a piss, they demanded it from everyone else.
  8. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 23 November 2017 06: 46
    0
    He likes the hegemon to participate in the establishment of a peaceful life. Only their peaceful life is cutting off their heads and killing.
  9. Observer2014
    Observer2014 23 November 2017 06: 46
    +2
    Will they try to make Germany and the GDR in Syria? With oriental flavor. Only it can easily turn out like in Vietnam.
  10. amirbek
    amirbek 23 November 2017 06: 58
    0
    Quote: Herkulesich
    Then they need to arrange Vietnam in Syria 2

    the American contingent (wherever it may be) is a target for shadow fighters ...
  11. Handbrake
    Handbrake 23 November 2017 07: 30
    0
    I have a feeling that with this thesis, representatives of Western democracy will fly by, because yesterday it was announced that negotiations were beginning with the apposition and progress towards the elections in Syria. Accordingly, Assad is likely to leave.
  12. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 23 November 2017 08: 02
    0
    Well, everything is clear whether they will create Igilovites through their bases or whom they will create to launch in Syria, keep the whole state in constant tension, and at the same time, yelling at the whole world is not guilty, there is no peace, Assad is to blame you need to drive him away and then everything will stop.
  13. zivXP
    zivXP 23 November 2017 08: 07
    0
    Well, it’s clear that they don’t want to leave. Is it in vain that there are so many bases configured?
    But it’s better to leave without shame. Will Mr. Putin only dare to take such drastic measures?
    I think it’s unlikely that compromises will prevail. Which, in principle, is not bad.
  14. anjey
    anjey 23 November 2017 08: 09
    0
    that the complete withdrawal of the American contingent "will guarantee the political survival of Bashar al-Assad as the president of Syria."
    Assad will be the guarantor of the Armed Forces of Russia and no one else, and the Yankees will by and large already do not change anything, they’ll miscalculate with Israel a little ....
  15. tank66
    tank66 23 November 2017 08: 24
    0
    I am an old conspiracy theorist and I responsibly declare that the United States are tame, stupid people of the Aglitsky / Baruch-Freemasons /. Petrushki are below the Kurdish level / well, they understandably want to stake their clearing for once /. "Our" Gazprom the jade rod is thinner than the Fashingtonsky one, but we won’t be able to lay the pipe “Qatar” to Qatar-Europe. We will have more screws and gears in the BV Entoy policy than in a lathe. But the death of a koshchey / needle, with which I need to break it / / I feel with fibers / in the eggs of the native Londovites. There you have to beat. As a different question.
  16. Separ DNR
    Separ DNR 23 November 2017 08: 26
    +2
    Quote: Herkulesich
    the Syrian army must clear ALL of its land SAMA from any uninvited troops, such as the Yankees and Turks! !! There only we are on legal failures! !!!!

    So then it is, but not quite.
    For example, to the Turks, after a series of negotiations on joining them in a coalition with Russia, a small fraction of legal rights was “delegated”.
    And the Americans ... Well. They are really uninvited "guests" who are a "bone in the throat" not only for the Syrians, but also for the Russian Federation.
  17. Phoenix_L'vov
    Phoenix_L'vov 23 November 2017 08: 36
    0
    It is interesting, on what basis?
  18. Romanenko
    Romanenko 23 November 2017 08: 41
    0
    It should be understood that pin-dos are not going to stop the terrorist war, they leave bases and instructors for training, supplying and arming every possible trash.
  19. Viktorfi
    Viktorfi 23 November 2017 08: 43
    +1
    All other statements that the United States came to Syria to fight terrorism are worthless.


    So Russia did not come first of all for the sake of the fight against terrorism, not for the Syrian people, but for its own interests, one of which is to preserve the Assad regime.
    What the USA, what Russia, what Iran, what Turkey - first of all want their piece of cake and influence.
    1. Asthma
      Asthma 23 November 2017 11: 48
      +1
      the hosts called us, we came. the rest is not that important.
      1. Viktorfi
        Viktorfi 23 November 2017 12: 29
        +1
        Quote: Asthma
        the hosts called us, we came. the rest is not that important.


        When Assad called, he was no longer the only owner.
        1. nPuBaTuP
          nPuBaTuP 23 November 2017 18: 45
          +2
          He was the rightful owner ..... so to speak spelled out ....
  20. Going
    Going 23 November 2017 08: 57
    +8
    Thus, in the States, despite all the statements by President Trump and certain representatives of his entourage, they emphasize: the ultimate goal of the United States in Syria is precisely to remove President Assad from his post.


    There will be a lot of fuss around Syria, it was clear immediately that the United States would not leave, they would try to exhaust Russia financially, through the war on B.V.
  21. Nemesis
    Nemesis 23 November 2017 09: 18
    +1
    In other words, the United States decided to leave its occupying forces in Syria. And this country dares to stutter about Russia's actions in Crimea ?! Laughter and more! USA - the country is a bandit!
  22. Doliva63
    Doliva63 23 November 2017 09: 46
    +6
    "The American contingent will remain in Syria ..."
    1. They want a "continuation of the banquet"; 2. They consciously take the risk of taking a direct part in it for the sake of their prestige and the interests of Israel.
    Completely lost coast fool
  23. Sergey53
    Sergey53 23 November 2017 11: 24
    0
    Well, otherwise we are withdrawing troops and withdrawing. It's only the beginning.
  24. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 23 November 2017 11: 46
    +1
    In particular, it is noted that Washington plans to extend its military presence on Syrian territory even after the Islamic State group is completely defeated
    Ms. Merkel and Mr. Macron are probably preparing sanctions laughing They are not hypocrites good
  25. LPD17
    LPD17 23 November 2017 12: 11
    +1
    But what is the Syrian representative at the UN doing? Where is the submission from Syria of a note recognizing the United Nations by the United States as the aggressor state and the imposition of international sanctions? Is your tongue stuck in the duplex? or is the Russian Foreign Ministry concerned about saving the senator in Nice?
  26. ul_vitalii
    ul_vitalii 23 November 2017 17: 53
    +6
    As in Afghanistan, they will be surrounded by a moat, a fence and a thorn, and they will be at a party.
  27. Sektant
    Sektant 23 November 2017 22: 29
    +1
    The position of the UN Security Council on this issue is interesting. After all, in fact, they are illegal occupiers.