Levada Center: Russians in Vladimir Putin are attracted to the fact that he is a “real man”

142
Today, the Levada Center publishes the results of polls relating to the attitude of the respondents to the activities of Vladimir Putin as president of the Russian Federation. It is reported that a total of 1,6 polled thousands of people over the age of 18 in 48 regions of the country.
One of the questions in the sociological study of the Levada Center was:
How would you rate Vladimir Putin’s work as president?


In this case, the evaluation options were as follows: “the lowest”, then from 2 to 9, then “the highest”.



The most popular answer was an assessment at the level of the "eight". So answered 19% of respondents. 2% of Russians, who took part in the survey, gave the lowest mark to V.Putin, and the highest - 17%.

Another research question:
What attracts you to Vladimir Putin?


Levada Center: Russians in Vladimir Putin are attracted to the fact that he is a “real man”


19% of respondents said that they are attracted to the president by the fact that he is a “real man” and also that he is resolute, courageous, firm, strong-willed, strong, calm, courageous, self-confident and “clear”.

2% of respondents said that they are attracted to the president by the fact that he returned the Crimea. 7% noted Putin’s vision and strategic thinking. 8% believe that nothing attracts them in Vladimir Putin.

Third question:
Why do not you like Vladimir Putin?


The most popular answers (15% of respondents): Does not care about people, does little for people, does not know how people live, forgot about ordinary people.

And this is the answer 10 percent of respondents "Levada Center": too "soft" to the ministers, dismissed the ministers, under the authority of his entourage, does not dismiss Medvedev.

Fourth question:
Do you think that Vladimir Putin is responsible for the problems facing the country during his rule?


55% of respondents answered: Yes, fully. Another 21% of Russians believe that it carries, "to some extent." 19% believe that Putin has done everything and is doing right, but he is hindered by corrupt officials and the legacy of 90.

The full version of the survey and its results can be found at site "Levada Center".
142 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    20 November 2017 13: 36
    Nothing attracts for a long time already. This is a famous phrase from the movie "and the king is something fake."
    1. +13
      20 November 2017 13: 45
      Well, this is your opinion. There are others.
      Quote: Altona
      Nothing attracts for a long time already. This is a famous phrase from the movie "and the king is something fake."
    2. +6
      20 November 2017 13: 47
      Levada Center: Russians in Vladimir Putin are attracted to the fact that he is a “real man”
      Well nafig ... I'm on the real women ...
    3. +5
      20 November 2017 13: 50
      Quote: Altona
      Attracts nothing for a long time already

      And who attracts? I mean, who attracts?
    4. +6
      20 November 2017 14: 00
      Then you are a “mistaken country” wassat
    5. +5
      20 November 2017 14: 02
      Did you miss Boris Borisovich?
      1. +9
        20 November 2017 14: 13
        According to Joseph Vissarionovich, Lavrenty Pavlovich and Felix Edmundovich. angry
      2. +6
        20 November 2017 14: 14
        Quote: Less
        Did you miss Boris Borisovich?
        According to Joseph Vissarionovich
      3. +1
        21 November 2017 13: 14
        Quote: Less
        Did you miss Boris Borisovich?

        Well, it begins: remember Yeltsin, look at Ukraine, look at Congo ...
    6. +12
      20 November 2017 14: 04
      It’s not only to be a peasant, you also need to think about the state and people. If you look at domestic politics, it’s a matter of seams. Nothing is essentially being done. In general, in my opinion, it’s not even a matter of personality, but of the president’s views on the political structure of the state. Putin is a liberal, unfortunately a democrat, he advocates the development of Russia in the most severe capitalist version, as in America. For Russia, this is a disaster. We need socialism. Otherwise, we will be slaves of a handful of oligarchs to plow for a penny and live in poverty. What is already happening. Further worse, Putin is doing everything gradually, his style, so to speak.
      1. +9
        20 November 2017 14: 05
        Well said +

        I’ll add ... He is building not capitalism, but oligarchic imperialism.. therefore, his efforts to increase the power of the military-industrial complex and the army coincide with the opinion of the people (and here he deservedly enjoys support) ... only the dreams of equipping Russia, the people and Putin are different ... bully
        1. +8
          20 November 2017 14: 16
          Quote: Nasr
          Well said +

          I’ll add ... He is building not capitalism, but oligarchic imperialism.. therefore, his efforts to increase the power of the military-industrial complex and the army coincide with the opinion of the people (and here he deservedly enjoys support) ... only the dreams of equipping Russia, the people and Putin are different ... bully

          Yes, I agree, your definition is more accurate.
          1. +10
            20 November 2017 14: 34
            Quote: Svarog
            Add ... He is building not capitalism, but oligarchic imperialism ..

            Quote: Svarog
            Yes, I agree, your definition is more accurate.

            Also to me, "definitives." Putin is building RUSSIA !!! Builds from what is currently there. And builds well! They say correctly: the big picture needs to be viewed from afar. It is not for nothing that such a howl rises from behind the hillock - they seem to know better what Putin is doing and how. And everyone who assiduously criticizes him in our country has a blinded look - they care about their personal well-being, and not about the well-being of Russia. Unlike them, Putin has another goal - to make Russia great again. And in order to achieve this, it is necessary for some time to give up something. You can’t immediately chase two hares - you can stay with a broken trough. We are required only not to interfere with our president, and to support his hard work, namely: to vote for him in the elections! (Oh, now the anti-Putinists will come at me! smile )
            1. SOF
              +8
              20 November 2017 14: 42
              (Oh, now the anti-Putinans will come at me! Smile)

              ... get up close. Fight off somehow ....
              1. +11
                20 November 2017 15: 12
                Quote: SOF
                . get up close.

                from the knees? laughing
                1. SOF
                  +3
                  20 November 2017 15: 23
                  from the knees?

                  ... funny how ... negative
                  I had to think long or in life like that?
                  1. +8
                    20 November 2017 15: 42
                    Quote: SOF
                    funny how ..

                    When you look at what is happening, what people are saying, at the misery of life in Zamkadia, I don't care a damn thing.
                    I don’t even want to breed srach about this citizen.
                    In short, you are an electorate (your idol calls you that), but I do not. Dot. soldier
                    1. SOF
                      +3
                      20 November 2017 15: 55
                      I don’t even want to breed srach about this citizen.

                      ... according to Stanislavsky - I DO NOT BELIEVE, since still breed, and moreover
                      ... srach ...
                      you come out especially noble.
                      And for a snack, if I am an electorate (by the way, this is not an idol calls me, but this is a generally accepted definition since ancient Rome), and you, "exceptional", and you are NO, then who are you?
                      I suspect that the "dissent" - yes?
                      1. +1
                        20 November 2017 16: 03
                        exactly, the definition of those whom the Roman politician buys
                    2. +3
                      20 November 2017 17: 16
                      "In short, you are an electorate (your idol calls you that), but I do not. Point"

                      Join us!
                      1. SOF
                        +2
                        20 November 2017 17: 32
                        Quote: Million
                        "In short, you are an electorate (your idol calls you that), but I do not. Point"

                        Join us!

                        Wow.
                        Hockey, but will we also refuse from the definition of Homo Sapiens? wassat
                        Old Freud could have "earned" a lot, for his labors, in communication with you. hi
            2. +14
              20 November 2017 15: 07
              The fact that he builds and how there are different opinions ... Personally, I, people who put monuments to Yeltsin and protect them from the people, do not consider Russia as patriots ... Great Russia, with such a policy, will not work out for sure ... Russia is trampling around Yeltsin’s swamp ... 20 years, under Putin ... and will continue to stagnate in the same place ... until they bury Yeltsin and his company, but under Putin this is not real. He does not want to ...
            3. +8
              20 November 2017 15: 07
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              We are required only not to interfere with our president, and to support his hard work, namely: to vote for him in the elections!

              Yeah, shchazzzz, already on the way ...
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              (Oh, now the anti-Putinans will come at me! Smile)

              not interesting already negative
            4. +1
              20 November 2017 15: 12
              I support you.
            5. +4
              20 November 2017 15: 19
              [quote = СРЦ П-15] Builds from what is currently available [/ quote]
              Russia is the largest and richest country in the world. What does it mean to build from what is?
              [quote = СРЦ П-15] And builds well! [/ quote]
              Putin has been in power for 17 years. What do you think we are not bad? Maybe medicine? Education? Science? In what areas have we achieved significant success, not taking into account the production of hydrocarbons and the achievements of the USSR? What has Chubais been doing for over 10 years with his Rusnano? By comparison, Stalin pulled Russia out of a much worse position in 16 years. [quote = СРЦ П-15] And everyone who zealously criticizes him in our country have a blinkered look
              Blinded look - an interesting definition) Do you live in Russia?

              [quote = СРЦ П-15] they care about their personal well-being, and not about the well-being of Russia [/ quote]
              You share the personal well-being (of the people of Russia) and the well-being of Russia, how is it? Russia separately, people separately?))
              [quote = СРЦ П-15] Unlike them, Putin has a different goal - to make Russia great again [/ quote]
              The state should serve the people, and not rob it, then it has every chance to be great ...
              [quote = СРЦ П-15] And in order to achieve this, you need to give up something for a certain time. [/ quote]
              Perhaps you wanted to say "give up", namely 80% of the population of Russia. Please explain what do you think should be sacrificed so that Russia would be great again?
              1. +4
                20 November 2017 15: 39
                Quote: Svarog
                Please explain what do you think should be sacrificed so that Russia would be great again?

                What the Soviet people did under Stalin - their well-being for the sake of restoring their homeland. Remind you how people lived at that time? I still found "workdays" and I remember what they received, although I was a little old. I remember the pension of 12 rubles. I remember my mother’s work on the collective farm from dawn to dawn. With this method, Stalin pulled the country out of ruin! And not only Stalin. And you propose to do the same to Putin, if you give Stalin an example?
                Yes, I believe that the well-being of Russia and its people are interconnected! In a rich country, people can be rich, and in a poor country, chocolate can only be crooks and thieves. What is almost happening with us at this time, with few exceptions.
                And do not drag the Yeltsin Center to Putin! (This is me to the visitor under the nickname "Nemesis") It was not built by him and not by state money, he just did not object to its construction - we have "democracy". For me, let it be worth it so that people would spit at him like that.
                1. +5
                  20 November 2017 15: 52
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  What the Soviet people did under Stalin - their well-being for the sake of restoring their homeland.

                  That's right, but at the same time, Stalin walked in the same greatcoat and his entourage were not dollar billionaires and did not have real estate in the state capital. A comparison for this reason is not appropriate.
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  And you propose to do the same to Putin, if you give Stalin an example?

                  Yes, I suggest Putin to plant all his surroundings for a start, as you know, the fish rots from the head. But we understand that this will not happen. With us, no one is responsible for anything, generally .., no, well, scapegoats are of course found ..
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  Yes, I believe that the well-being of Russia and its people are interconnected! In a rich country, people can be rich, and in a poor country, chocolate can only be crooks and thieves. What is almost happening with us at this time, with few exceptions.

                  Our country is already rich, and the richest. And in terms of per capita income, we are 54th in the world. For this reason - from the beginning, the population must be rich, and then the country itself will become rich. And not vice versa.
                  Quote: СРЦ П-15
                  And do not drag the Yeltsin Center to Putin! It was not built by him and not by state money, he just did not object to its construction - we have “democracy”. For me, let it be worth it so that people would spit at him like that.

                  This center could not have been built without the approval of Putin, just as Chubais would not have managed Rusnano. This is one liberal, pro-Western group, only Putin distances himself from everyone because he knows that these people are not popular among the people.
                  1. +4
                    20 November 2017 16: 11
                    Quote: Svarog
                    That's right, but at the same time, Stalin walked in the same greatcoat and his entourage were not dollar billionaires and did not have real estate in the state capital. A comparison for this reason is not appropriate.

                    Do you propose that Putin walk in the same suit? You cannot understand: the time is now completely different and rich people surrounded by the president not only in Russia, but around the world! Do you propose to surround our president with some silverfish? But only a question: where to get them? Do you have any in mind?
                    Quote: Svarog
                    Yes, I suggest Putin to plant all his surroundings for a start, as you know, the fish rots from the head.

                    Well, who will replace this environment? Aren't you like you?
                    Quote: Svarog
                    Our country is already rich, and the richest. And in terms of per capita income, we are 54th in the world.

                    The country is rich, but these riches do not belong to the people! And this is not a merit of Putin! The oligarchs were before him, are with him and will be after him! It’s not a shame, but it’s an axiom. And the next president will not get rid of them.
                    Quote: Svarog
                    This center could not have been built without the approval of Putin, just as Chubais would not have managed Rusnano. This is one liberal, pro-Western group, only Putin distances himself from everyone because he knows that these people are not popular among the people.

                    What makes you think that the Yeltsin center was built with Putin’s approval? He simply did not mind building it. Thus, he showed his unwillingness to divide the people into friends and foes. He is the president and must be above that.
                    1. +3
                      20 November 2017 19: 55
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      What makes you think that the Yeltsin center was built with Putin’s approval? He simply did not mind building it. Thus, he showed his unwillingness to divide the people into friends and foes. He is the president and must be above that.

                      Do you really think that among the people there are those who supported Yeltsin? Then, what kind of division are we talking about?
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      The country is rich, but these riches do not belong to the people! And this is not a merit of Putin! The oligarchs were before him, are with him and will be after him! It’s not a shame, but it’s an axiom. And the next president will not get rid of them.

                      That's at least agree with me. Therefore, I am against the oligarchs. Or rather this system. I do not consider Putin as a person, but as a statesman. And he is on the side of the system, which, as you say, will not get rid of the oligarchs. Therefore, I am against his candidacy. Russia must live under socialism, otherwise slavery. Our oligarchs, unlike the western ones, as they say, "do not see the shores."
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      Well, who will replace this environment? Aren't you like you?

                      Doesn’t it seem strange to you that we have no sane opposition? Such a big country, a lot of educated people, well, damn it, there is no alternative to Putin, for miracles. And this is due to the fact that he clings tightly to power, thinks about the Russian state ..
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      Do you propose that Putin walk in the same suit? You cannot understand: the time is now completely different and rich people surrounded by the president not only in Russia, but around the world! Do you propose to surround our president with some silverfish? But only a question: where to get them? Do you have any in mind?

                      Yes, I understand that time is not right now. And I'm not talking about the overcoat, as such, but about the approach to public service.
                    2. +2
                      20 November 2017 22: 41
                      Quote: СРЦ П-15
                      The country is rich, but these riches do not belong to the people! And this is not a merit of Putin! The oligarchs were before him, are with him and will be after him! It’s not a shame, but it’s an axiom. And the next president will not get rid of them.

                      What kind of president is such that for 17 years he cannot get rid of thieves? Maybe he has no power, and so, for a show off cheeks puffs? There, already his beloved Government Himself openly sends with deoffshorization.
                      1. +1
                        20 November 2017 23: 32
                        That's right, the feeling is that he is only a screen, and the lake is in charge of the country.
              2. +1
                20 November 2017 16: 06
                Quote: Svarog
                The state should serve the people, and not rob it, then it has every chance to be great ...

                Before the state begins to serve the people, first the people must build this very state.
            6. 0
              20 November 2017 23: 27
              So far, he has only built his offshore accounts, and Russia is cheating.
            7. +2
              21 November 2017 13: 58
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              And everyone who assiduously criticizes him in our country has a blinded look - they care about their personal well-being, and not about the well-being of Russia.

              For the sake of Russia's well-being, I’m ready to tolerate it, it’s only morally difficult to do it when gas prices go up, food prices go up, communal services go up, medicine prices go up, and there is no salary, and when every day we are shown on TV Serdyukov and Zakharchenko and that's it it is UNPUNISHED with them! The Russian Guard protects the bandits at their gatherings, where is prosperity, is it necessary to build it for 200 years?
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              and provide support in his hard work, namely: to vote for him in the elections!

              Vote, then there are no others, but just wait for prosperity?
          2. +1
            20 November 2017 15: 15
            Quote: Nasr
            Add ... He is building not capitalism, but oligarchic imperialism.

            Imperialism is the highest stage of capitalism, progress means, and it is impossible to build an empire without oligarchs. In addition, what is only the United States possible and not the other?
        2. +2
          20 November 2017 17: 08
          Nasrat
          "... only dreams of arranging Russia, the people and Putin are different ..."

          The whole question is which nation?
      2. +4
        20 November 2017 14: 07
        If you look at domestic politics, it’s a matter of seams. Nothing is essentially being done.


        laughing expert review
      3. The comment was deleted.
        1. +5
          20 November 2017 14: 15
          as in Latin America, there’s even such a term - a banana republic


          only clowns can compare the Russian Federation with banana republics. Yes, Vasya? Or can you give me an example of banana republics introduced by nuclear power plants in different parts of the world?

          I have been reading for a long time how you speak about the Russian girl and so on - in general, your attempts to bark at the authorities are a miserable sight.

          I wish you to move from Russia to the banana republic. Then you’ll sit here with a banana with a smart look, telling how he healed famously, and I read
          1. +1
            20 November 2017 15: 09
            Quote: s-t Petrov
            I wish you to move from Russia to the banana republic. Then you’ll sit here with a banana with a smart look, telling how he healed famously, and I read
            Pff, programmers and freelancers are moving with might and main to all sorts of banana republics, closer to palm trees and the sea. If only the Internet was where you can make money.
            1. +1
              20 November 2017 15: 13
              Pff, programmers and freelancers are moving with might and main to all sorts of banana republics, closer to palm trees and the sea.


              Stirbjörn, even there, is not needed by anyone for nothing. And then I’m just the second word after the programmer, but the idea of ​​leaving for Thailand is the same to me, so that I can work with Russia remotely.
              1. +1
                20 November 2017 16: 18
                there will be no masters, and footmen will not be needed, so a good riddance.
          2. +1
            20 November 2017 15: 24
            What a bomb laughing
            Second Lieutenant Oak did not say a word and, shaking his head, left in confusion, but then he again returned from the headquarters car and shouted to Schweik:
            - Remember all of you! The time will come, you will cry with me!
            He wasn’t enough for more, and he went into the staff carriage, where Captain Sagner was just interrogating one unfortunate soldier of the twelfth company, who was brought by sergeant major Strnad. The soldier was already taking measures to protect himself in the trenches, and from somewhere from the station he dragged the door of the pork crib upholstered with tin.
            Now he stood with his eyes wide in fear, making excuses for wanting to take the door with him as a shrapnel cover to be safe.
            Taking the opportunity, Lieutenant Oak burst out with a sermon on how a soldier should behave, what are his responsibilities towards the fatherland and the monarch, who is the supreme commander in chief and the highest military ruler. If such elements were wound up in the battalion, they should be eradicated, punished and imprisoned. This talk was so tasteless that the captain patted the offender on the shoulder and told him:
            - If you had nothing bad in your thoughts, then do not repeat this in the future. After all, this is stupid. Take the door from where you got it, and get the hell out!
            Second Lieutenant Oak bit his lip and decided that it was up to him alone to save discipline in the battalion.
            1. +3
              20 November 2017 15: 25
              What a bomb


              this is your ceiling. Your iskorementii. You’ve been bombed by Putin for 15 years now, but I know you are patient and will suffer with your brothers from this forum.

              You have a circle of patient

              You have almost comprehended Zen with patience, but you are still gambling, there is something to strive for.

              In the meantime, you stand sitting, you can still quote something. Entertain the same gifted and alternative-thinking, freedom-loving and non-living

              1. +2
                20 November 2017 19: 38
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                In the meantime, you stand sitting, you can still quote something. Entertain the same gifted and alternative-thinking, freedom-loving and non-living

                I can, I read literature, tea does not degenerate what, whose brains are only enough to overpower the training manual for trolling tongue
    7. Maz
      +1
      20 November 2017 14: 47
      Normal inhabitants with the "good" king, after the horrors of the rule of bad Yeltsin. And they do not want to look for a better emperor, for the best is the enemy of the good. But there is no alternative to GDP. And if there is, then his competitors are banging, or they are hiding it like aliens on the moon did not merge
    8. SOF
      +1
      20 November 2017 14: 57
      Quote: Altona
      Nothing attracts for a long time already. This is a famous phrase from the movie "and the king is something fake."

      ... after such a separation from reality, no wonder:
      Quote: Altona
      Putin is the same Navalny, only greatly stretched in time

      It remains only to wish a successful flight ...
    9. +3
      20 November 2017 15: 03
      A real man, consciously or not, has spread anti-Sovietism in the country.
      1. +1
        20 November 2017 15: 57
        Better to see once than hear a hundred times

        1. +1
          20 November 2017 16: 01
          Continued:

          1. +2
            20 November 2017 16: 07
            Continued:

            1. +1
              20 November 2017 16: 08
              Continued:

    10. 0
      21 November 2017 13: 50
      Do you support Sisyan Navalny? Delighted with Sobchak? Sympathize with the rotten Apple? Or will you run for president? There is no alternative to Putin in the near future
  2. +3
    20 November 2017 13: 41
    It’s quite real.
    And attracts the population.
    Otherwise, they would not have voted for him.
    Well, and the consequence, as the law.
    Every nation deserves what it has.
    And vice versa, it has what it deserves.
    1. +6
      20 November 2017 13: 51
      Quote: Livonetc
      Every nation deserves what it has.
      And vice versa, it has what it deserves.

      people often have, although he is not worthy.
      1. +4
        20 November 2017 14: 31
        Rather: they are unworthy, but just worthy ....
      2. 0
        20 November 2017 15: 04
        .
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        people often have, although he is not worthy.

        go to the polls and vote for candidates with an alternative program
  3. +4
    20 November 2017 13: 46
    Well, yes, he is a man, not a woman. And besides, a real man, not one of these LGBT people.
    1. +5
      20 November 2017 13: 51
      solzh
      Well, yes, he is a man, not a woman. And besides, a real man, not one of these LGBT people.
      Have you seen his other half? Well, tell me what you heard. But saw? Or is it secret!? And if it's secret then why?
      1. +4
        20 November 2017 14: 00
        Quote: Observer2014
        Have you seen his other half?
        Medvedev chtoli? love
        1. +3
          20 November 2017 14: 03
          Greenwood
          Medvedev chtoli?
          laughing wassat How do I know! laughing This is there comrade solzh 100% sure that Putin
          man not woman
          laughing
          1. +2
            20 November 2017 14: 12
            I am sure, otherwise he had the name of Putin, Vladlena Vladimirovna. Just in case, I am not a supporter of GDP, I am a supporter of the Soviet system.
      2. +6
        20 November 2017 14: 02
        Quote: Observer2014
        you saw his second half

        Sergey please
        And why divorced, it's their own business. hi
        1. +4
          20 November 2017 14: 07
          79807420129 hi
          And why divorced, it's their own business.
          This woman he abandoned. But (Peskov confirmed that Putin has all the rules on the personal front) Only in such a position should the personal front be public.
          1. +6
            20 November 2017 14: 35
            Quote: Observer2014
            Only in such a position should the personal front be public.

            Sergei, no matter who the spouses are, even the king with the queen of the universe, personal life is their personal life and I for example have no right to intervene Yes I also really do not like it when people interfere in mine, and you probably too, only God is sinless. hi
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. +1
        20 November 2017 14: 09
        No, I have not seen the new second half, only heard. Do you think that he is not a man?
        1. +2
          20 November 2017 14: 11
          solzh
          Do you think that he is not a man?
          That's when he will introduce the other half to the people. Then it will become clear. hi And until that moment, you can print nonsense even until tomorrow.
  4. +2
    20 November 2017 13: 49
    Putin is good. The best president. Thank you for having it with us. If not for him, we would have been stuck in the 90s. wassat
    1. +2
      20 November 2017 13: 52
      He got stuck in the early 2000s wink
      1. +7
        20 November 2017 13: 55
        Quote: Greenwood
        Putin is good. The best president. Thank you for having it with us. If not for him, we would have been stuck in the 90s.
        some do not think so
  5. +10
    20 November 2017 13: 52
    Quote: Altona
    Nothing attracts for a long time already. This is a famous phrase from the movie "and the king is something fake."

    For all that it is not necessary to speak! Someone might be better off with Anal or Bitten, and we choose GDP!
    1. +5
      20 November 2017 13: 58
      Quote: Evrodav
      and we
      Who are we"?
      1. +8
        20 November 2017 14: 03
        Quote: Greenwood
        Who are we"?

        Obviously not “you” wink
      2. +3
        20 November 2017 14: 11
        Who are we"?


        dear people. Any officer and any other government official should be grateful to Putin. Well, who has a head on his shoulders and who found the little time that was Before.

        1. +3
          20 November 2017 14: 13
          because the man said - the man did. His affairs may not be liked only by the enemy or a person who was infinitely far from the army and does not understand the full extent of the affairs that happened during the reign of Vladimir Vladimirovich

        2. +2
          20 November 2017 14: 16
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          Any officer should be grateful to Putin.
          Above, they brought out the statement of one officer.
          1. +5
            20 November 2017 14: 19
            And what do I need this officer? I live in a military town. My father is an officer. All my friends are officers now, and all my father’s friends are officers. I saw how officers lived before. I see how they live and what they drive now, I see what apartments they are given out and what kind of allowance they pay

            If this does not matter to you, then I don’t know.

            I’m not talking about new equipment in the army, about food and about the form that they used to buy for their money.

            Previously, officers looked at them with pity, but the girls did not look at them at all - because the officer was a synonym for the word - beggar. And the girls cannot be blamed for this. This is objective - because everyone wants to continue the race and not produce poverty.

            Now I have a lot of friends - who in aviation - who where. I look at them and rejoice for the army. And they give birth to children and enter mortgages - for there is confidence in the future. And it's worth it

            look what happened to the fleet before Putin. He stood at the wall without fuel and lubricants. all that happened - happened thanks to his competent rule.



            1. +7
              20 November 2017 15: 14
              Damn, reminded me directly:
              Quote: s-t Petrov
              I live in a military town. My father is an officer. All my friends are officers now, and all my father’s friends are officers.
              "Believe me! I myself am a Crimean, daughter of an officer! We have not everything so simple ...." (c)
              1. +1
                20 November 2017 15: 15
                Yes, it doesn’t matter to me what my post reminds you of - if you don’t see changes in the army, then I wish you to join the army again and update the data. Or at least chat with friends who serve.

                And better find those who served in 99 and are now in the service - so that he tells you about the contrasts

                And about the "Crimean" - so these are just trolls from the west who tell tales about Russia.

                If you think that I told you fairy tales here - your right to think this way and live in your reality.

              2. +3
                20 November 2017 19: 57
                Quote: Greenwood
                "Believe me! I myself am a Crimean, daughter of an officer! We have not everything so simple ...." (c)

                Well, how else, lives in a military town, all around are officers, and he is alone ... a freelancer (see above)fellow , that’s why you have to earn extra money in the “information troops” - if you need the “daughter of an officer”, in such a case there is no need to be principled, for this they don’t pay
                It’s strange, of course, to be a freelancer in such a place - disabled person or something ?!
                1. +1
                  21 November 2017 10: 45
                  Stirbjörn you are pathetic and not interesting. If it were not for my obligations at the troll factory in the Kremlin, I would never have entered into a polemic with you.

                  I was paid money for you in the Kremlin, for the fact that I’m sitting here like terpils and laugh at your pathetic attempts and bark at the walls of the Kremlin)

                  So it’s kind of like he got into some kind of substance when he talked to you - but nothing, Putin will give me money for this

                  It’s strange, of course, to be a freelancer in such a place - disabled person or something ?!


                  You can be a freelancer anywhere. You make friends with logic. You boast that you read books) The main thing is that the result is.

                  Hydrocephalus can also do things. So then if.
                  1. +2
                    21 November 2017 16: 24
                    Quote: s-t Petrov
                    You can be a freelancer anywhere. You make friends with logic. You boast that you read books) The main thing is that the result is.
                    Admit that you are in fact a disabled person ... for living in a military camp, surrounded by officers, and even being such a fervent patriot, he will not get a job in the Armed Forces, at least civilian ?! - the more you yourself describe what kind of paradise there is on earth! Not a single officer will hang around with a able-bodied freelancer, because in essence it is a parasite, not paying any taxes to the state. They normally earn one in a hundred, and you are clearly not one of them, because you are deprived of intelligence. Therefore, the anger from you is rushing, offended by life, and the admins are loyal to you, although they regularly remove the same Mikhan, already changed a dozen nicknames, and you have to troll people for soldering, at least somehow attached ... so I’m all clear about you now wink
                    1. 0
                      21 November 2017 16: 27
                      not get a job in the armed forces, at least civilian


                      I already gave the army 3 years. And I remember this glorious time with warmth. And the uniform and boots are in the closet - I'm proud of them.

                      Not a single officer will hang around with a able-bodied freelancer, because in essence it is a parasite, not paying any taxes to the state.


                      In addition to freelance, I have a major job. I don’t whine about the fact that it’s not enough for me, but I work at two jobs. Available, Vasya?) And I spend 80 hours a month on the way to the main job

                      PS I worked on freelance with Sun through a contractor and an office wink

                      They normally earn one in a hundred, and you are clearly not one of them, because you are deprived of intelligence.


                      tell me how much I earn “there” - you don’t even have a clue what the area is - and draw conclusions. Well, I'm not surprised by such acting tricks)

                      Therefore, anger from you and rushing, offended by life


                      my anger is when I call you patient?)

                      so everything is clear to me about you now wink


                      I say you are a clown. What else can you discuss with you?)

                      the same Mikhan’s regularly removed, a dozen nicknames changed


                      and they will remove me. just click the complaint more often

            2. +2
              21 November 2017 08: 15
              Putin supports the army, the police, like any dictator. Therefore, it is not surprising that it is convenient for people in uniform. But you don’t want to see anything further than your military town, look around, look what is happening in the country, and not just in the army. Financing medicine and education from year to year is less and less. Why are hospitals in central Russia closed? Soon we will collect SMSkami for appendicitis surgery in Germany, as for oncology now, because everything will fall apart.
              1. 0
                21 November 2017 11: 09
                Putin supports the army, the police, like any dictator. Therefore, it is not surprising that it is convenient for people in uniform.


                laughing Are you Ukrainian or Libyan?

                But you do not want to see anything further than your military camp


                Yes, I live in a vacuum and do not go beyond the fence around the town

                Financing of medicine and education from year to year less and less


                prove it.

                Soon we will collect SMSkami for appendicitis surgery in Germany, as for oncology now, because everything will fall apart.


                show doctors an example of how to treat.
                1. 0
                  21 November 2017 16: 52

                  What do you need to prove, read more, raise your horizons and do not ask stupid questions.
                  https://www.rbc.ru/society/07/04/2017/58e4feb59a7
                  94722462a85aa
                  https://www.rbc.ru/economics/14/12/2016/584fd32e9
                  a7947c251265ede
                  1. 0
                    21 November 2017 17: 35
                    read more, raise your horizons


                    and did you give a link to the source of enlightenment? laughing go clarified forest. Turn on your head and look at the chart. When it arrived somewhere, it disappeared somewhere. Costs have not critically fallen, but social spending has increased. As well as defense.

                    1. 0
                      22 November 2017 08: 16
                      The graphs are beautiful, but they do not explain why hospitals are closing in central Russia. And I myself came across this, my father had to go to another city for a simple operation on the stomach, since in his city (not a small one - 250 thousand people), the hospital was closed, where operations had been performed before.
  6. 0
    20 November 2017 13: 52
    Quote: 210ox
    Well, this is your opinion. There are others.

    but I agree with the opinion of the previous
  7. +2
    20 November 2017 13: 54
    Quote: Livonetc
    It’s quite real.
    And attracts the population.
    Otherwise, they would not have voted for him.
    Well, and the consequence, as the law.
    Every nation deserves what it has.
    And vice versa, it has what it deserves.

    To go nuts, as you have veiled everything, neither vorogs nor friends will understand - you are for or against ... Have you ever been to the election headquarters?
  8. +1
    20 November 2017 13: 57
    Well, this is against the background of the fact that the presidents began to nominate "real p.o.st.t.t.t.t.c.i" of both sexes!
  9. +6
    20 November 2017 14: 01
    Judging by affairs is necessary. And not according to the words. So far everything that he does suits me ...
    1. +6
      20 November 2017 14: 21
      what is he doing
      What is he doing? And then it’s interesting with us, if something bad is not he, but if there is something to praise, then he is.
      1. +3
        20 November 2017 14: 27
        What is he doing?


        does not write posts on the forum, so does nothing, yes Gardamir?)
      2. SOF
        +3
        20 November 2017 14: 47
        And then it’s interesting with us, if something bad is not he, but if there is something to praise, then he is.

        ... your course is different: if something good was born, if it’s bad, then Putin is to blame.
        ... the cat left the kittens ..... every democrat knows ... etc.
        1. +2
          20 November 2017 14: 59
          yours of course is different: if something good is born, then if it’s bad, then Putin is to blame.
          you have no answer so little troll.
          1. SOF
            +4
            20 November 2017 15: 05
            you have no answer

            ... what is the question - that is the answer.
            If you want a dialogue, tie it up with cheap propaganda ...
  10. +4
    20 November 2017 14: 16
    The most effective leader of Russia after the death of Stalin. Replacements today are not visible, unfortunately. Health and success!
    1. +9
      20 November 2017 15: 20
      Quote: Victor N
      The most effective leader of Russia after the death of Stalin.

      Something tells me that Comrade Stalin would have talked differently with this “effective” one.
      1. SOF
        +1
        20 November 2017 18: 32
        Quote: Greenwood
        Quote: Victor N
        The most effective leader of Russia after the death of Stalin.

        Something tells me that Comrade Stalin would have talked differently with this “effective” one.

        I suspect that with you, Comrade Stalin, I would not stand on ceremony for a particularly "free" opinion. So, use what you have :)
  11. 0
    20 November 2017 14: 26
    I read the comments and realized that the FR comes complete n ####### c ... good luck, gentlemen.
    1. +1
      21 November 2017 15: 05
      Only now do you understand?
  12. +6
    20 November 2017 14: 29
    Quote: Evrodav
    For all that it is not necessary to speak! Someone might be better off with Anal or Bitten, and we choose GDP!

    -------------------------------
    I did not speak for everyone, only for myself. You have some kind of extremes, either Putin or Navalny. Putin is the same Navalny, only very extended in time. The results will be the same.
    1. +3
      20 November 2017 14: 34
      why are you so categorically typing nonsense?

      Let's hypothetically imagine that Navalny came to power instead of Putin in '99.

      Will Navalny fly to Dagestan? Fly to Kadyrov in Chechnya? What does he steal in the Caucasus there? And yes, for sure, this clown is for the separation of the Caucasus.

      Okay. God bless him with the Caucasus. Further, Navalny must pay with the IMF, and resolve the situation with Khodorkovsky. Will he ruin? Yeah.

      How much would the RF GDP increase with Navalny? How much money would go from mining to the budget?

      And what would happen to Navalny with the army? Siloviki?
      With the office?
    2. SOF
      +3
      20 November 2017 14: 52
      extremes

      ... and are you talking about extremes? negative
      It is not even funny.
  13. +11
    20 November 2017 14: 38
    Robert Mugabe was also a Man and the nickname corresponding to "Crocodile" (in Africa it is appreciated ..)
    96% percent supported him, but they ousted him from his post and at least one peaked in defense of his beloved crocodile.
    Therefore, such polls never reflect the real picture and their values ​​are 0 for understanding the present, and they are widely covered solely for the public relations of our peasant.
    1. +2
      20 November 2017 15: 21
      and the censor always puts Ceaucescu as an example. Like here

      Are you also waiting, together with our little brothers, for business in Russia?)
    2. +4
      20 November 2017 15: 22
      And the country under Mugab lived well, all the neighbors envy. wassat
      1. +2
        20 November 2017 15: 22
        Let’s take Gaddafi’s example. The country lived in agony, until the clowns liberated the country from the oppression of the tyrant, after his death cosmos came to earth and the universal good, huh?)

        There, probably at that time, at local forums and tweets, everyone also laughed at the colonel, who "tired of" them and did nothing in the country.

        And in the end, the clowns seized upon their dreams and freed themselves from oppression.

        1. +2
          20 November 2017 15: 51
          Quote: s-t Petrov
          Let’s take Gaddafi’s example.
          And where does Gaddafi? I have nothing against him. He really did a lot for his country. Under him, Libya really rose and was a very influential state, and citizens enjoyed various social privileges.
          The same thing, albeit with reservations, can be said about Saddam in Iraq. No, but there was order with him. There were no daily terrorist attacks, ethnic cleansing, or civil war. In the 70s, until Saddam got involved in a war with Iran, Iraq was generally one of the most prosperous states in the Middle East. And if Saddam had not captured Kuwait in the 90s, Iraq would not have been sanctioned and the future enemy of the entire civilized world would not have been made of it.

          But I see no reason to equate the populist and the tyrant Mugabe with these individuals. He did not bring Zimbabwe to the leaders of the African world, he could not even maintain the country's economy and lifestyle at that very high level left over from the time of Rhodesia. He drove the country into chaos and poverty. An analogue of Yeltsin. The first fought against the white colonialists, the second - with the Communist Party.
        2. +3
          20 November 2017 15: 52
          Or Singapore, which has turned from a poor country into a rich country thanks to the right ruler and the fight against corruption, while unlike Russia it did not have so many resources:


          Upon gaining independence, Singapore suffered from high corruption. Lee Kuan Yew characterized the situation as follows: “Corruption is one of the features of the Asian way of life. People openly accepted the reward, it was part of their life. ” The fight against corruption began "by simplifying decision-making procedures and removing any ambiguity in the laws as a result of issuing clear and simple rules, up to and including cancellation of permits and licensing." The salaries of judges were sharply raised, “the best private lawyers” were brought to judicial positions. The salary of a Singaporean judge reached several hundred thousand dollars a year (in the 1990s, over $ 1 million). Triads (organized crime groups) were severely suppressed. Police personnel were replaced from predominantly Malays to predominantly Chinese (this process was accompanied by excesses, and Li Kuan Yu personally came to the location of the rebellious Malay police for negotiation). Public servants in senior positions were raised salaries to a level typical for top managers of private corporations. An independent body was created to fight corruption in the highest echelons of power (investigations were even initiated against close relatives of Lee Kuan Yew). A number of ministers and senior officials convicted of corruption were sentenced to various terms of imprisonment, or committed suicide, or fled the country.
          1. SOF
            +1
            20 November 2017 18: 40
            Do you think that participating in This top is a little your business? No word is said about Benjamin. I would also understand if the Zimbabweans or Libyans had checked in, because they had been hooked in passing, but why are you trying to open our eyes on our leader?
            1. +2
              20 November 2017 19: 34
              Quote: SOF
              Do you think that participating in this top is a little up to you?


              It does not seem. I am a citizen of Russia, I visit Russia, I have relatives in Russia and I am not indifferent to what is happening in Russia.
              1. SOF
                0
                20 November 2017 19: 42
                Then take off my hat hi
  14. +2
    20 November 2017 14: 52
    This blevacenter has long been time to record in foreign agents Yes . To start... feel
  15. +2
    20 November 2017 15: 49
    Quote: Stroporez
    In short, you are an electorate (your idol calls you that), but I do not. Dot.

    I join good
    1. SOF
      +1
      20 November 2017 18: 42
      Baba Yaga against? laughing
  16. +5
    20 November 2017 15: 53
    People do not want, Schaub returned, as was before him!
    That's all love ... "successes" in the international "arena", this is just a nice bonus that allows you to amuse the wounded pride of the former imperial people.
    What is proposed or self-nominated in return is worse, however. That's the guarantee of victory in the election.
    An instructive example from neighbors does not cause a desire to jump and put pots on your head.
    And Schaub there west, geyropa, the liberals did not make a mistake, to be his president again, if only he wanted to !!!
    In short, the beam at the end of the tunnel, is in question!
  17. +7
    20 November 2017 15: 56
    Putin seeks power for power. And he wants to be in power, if possible as Brezhnev, because in the West, like M.S.G he will not be accepted. And for this he needs to strengthen the Armed Forces and the National Guard in order to ensure their own security and reduce the standard of living of the people. Neo-feudalism is the best system for this, which is where everything goes.
    1. +3
      20 November 2017 23: 39
      a decline in the people's standard of living is a side effect of desire to be enriched. No one will try to make everyone feel good, and there’s no way.
      The law of nature / economy, and indeed of everything - THERE HAS PROFITED, HERE FOUND -
  18. +3
    20 November 2017 16: 09
    Quote: s-t Petrov
    Let's hypothetically imagine that Navalny came to power instead of Putin in '99.

    Will Navalny fly to Dagestan? Fly to Kadyrov in Chechnya? What does he steal in the Caucasus there? And yes, for sure, this clown is for the separation of the Caucasus.

    --------------------------------------------
    In fact, and not hypothetically, the security forces seized power from the liberals in 1999. Because the Primakov-Maslyakov Government scared them with their agility, the economy began to grow by tens of percent over the year. Therefore, the leftists were removed from power and found a compromise figure-GDP, a silovik and a liberal in one bottle. The liberals were left with the banking sector and finances, the security forces were given everything else. But it was firmly decided that out of ideologies, only Black Hundreds, called patriotism and liberal postmodernity, would remain, to please the West. The extreme liberals who advocated the return of Russia under the immediate control of the West were pushed back, and they themselves had not yet plundered their fill. The people are slowly but surely pulling out the social gains of the USSR. They are preparing a constitutional reform, although it is still rumored that the position of the President is abolished, and the position of Chairman of the State Council is conducted. That is, there will be a two-story electoral system where the head of state will be appointed by the right people. This, I repeat, is still only a rumor. There will be about three main parties. The ruling type of the EP and the protest, they will call it whatever the people's labor or else, just not communist. It should unite pensioners and former "scoops", remembering the USSR. The ideology will naturally be Black-Hundred - for faith, tsar and the fatherland without communists. Maybe now I'm telling you shocking things, but over time you will forget my post, and reality will change.
  19. +5
    20 November 2017 16: 57
    Already there was something similar to Yeltsin. Forgot? "Yeltsin, our president." "A real Russian man," "vote for Yeltsin or lose" ....
    The more Putin is praised, the nastier it gets
  20. SOF
    +1
    20 November 2017 16: 57
    twviewer,
    Nonsense ...
    1. +1
      20 November 2017 17: 35
      it’s stupid to write something you don’t know, at least you should read about Guy Julia, look at the worst, I suspect that the little thing is not a reader ?!
      1. SOF
        +1
        20 November 2017 18: 53
        ... stupidly clever off topic, sending others to read About Gaya Julia.
        You will argue that the term "Elector" or "Electorate" means "voter"? If so, then I will abstain and, again, send you to old Freud.
        1. +1
          20 November 2017 19: 17
          What kind of voter did I describe? Do you have problems with perception? this rogue Freud hammered your skull.
          1. SOF
            +1
            20 November 2017 19: 39
            No comments.....
            When soft is not soft, but hot, then it’s unlikely that you can help with anything.
            1. 0
              20 November 2017 20: 39
              write it on your forehead and often look in the mirror, otherwise you’re going to talk about things on a national scale without even understanding the elementary
              however for your idol this is a typical electorate
  21. +2
    20 November 2017 17: 18
    Quote: Viktorfi
    He got stuck in the early 2000s wink


    Now it’s clear why you have a tooth on him ...
  22. +4
    20 November 2017 17: 25
    When there’s nothing more to boast about, they say: for this, a real man!
    IMHO: a man keeps his word, but Putin has big difficulties with this. Look at his early election promises, if you find, of course, and think about it.
    1. +5
      20 November 2017 17: 40
      Quote: TsShVS
      a man keeps his word, and Putin has great difficulties with this. Look at his early campaign promises, if you find, of course, and think about it.

      and what is there to think, the title balabol is. Yes
  23. +4
    20 November 2017 17: 34
    For lovers of foreign agents ...
    "Levada Center, being funded by foreign organizations, participates in political activities in Russia in the interests of these organizations, the act of verification of the Ministry of Justice said. This center does, according to the department, “through the preparation and dissemination, including using modern information technologies, of opinions on decisions taken by government bodies and their policies, as well as the formation of socio-political views and beliefs, through social studies, surveys public opinion and the publication of their results. ”
    https://www.rbc.ru/politics/06/09/2016/57ceaf969a
    79473d2c782a3d
    See the root. Levada is the center, Yeltsin is the center, they are doing one thing. They form the public opinion of the poor Russian people at the direction of the rich non-Russian people.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. +2
    20 November 2017 17: 53
    SOF,
    how do you think primitively
    1. SOF
      +1
      20 November 2017 18: 54
      ... and YOU tell me about this? wassat
  26. +4
    20 November 2017 17: 58
    The situation before the election. Once again the same thing. And the carrot is the same ..
  27. 0
    20 November 2017 19: 01
    Quote: SOF
    Baba Yaga against?

    laughing
    1. SOF
      +1
      20 November 2017 19: 12
      ... here I am about the same laughing
  28. +1
    20 November 2017 19: 33
    Quote: SOF
    ..that I am about the same

    trolls ignore hi
    1. SOF
      +1
      20 November 2017 19: 41
      With the deepest borrowing hi
  29. +3
    20 November 2017 23: 40
    Man - Way, ha, yes men go to Botox, a man must be a support, don’t take his own - this is about the Kursk submarine, she drowned, or about the guys in dill, they say not ours and two were rotted in Syria, not ours, Turks shot down the plane, the pilot died, nothing tomatoes. His friends and sons-in-law are billionaires, and in the country veterans, war heroes live worse than slaves. A man will not offend women - ha, Politkovskaya and Estemirova, children, but not children in the Nord Ost and Beslan, we recall the Ryazan sugar. A coward, a hypocrite, a money-lover, a narcissist and a liar, at least once went live on the debate, but he even can’t.
    1. SOF
      0
      21 November 2017 07: 53
      too much saliva ... rub yourself down.
      ... in every word - lies ...
      who are we moving? Bulk?
      1. 0
        22 November 2017 16: 08
        Where is the lie? Everything to the point. You can also add Rokhlin and Swan. And what does Navalny have to do with it? When these things were happening, Navalny was still biting the granite of science and did not climb anywhere.
  30. +1
    21 November 2017 01: 57
    WE ARE PUTTING PUTIN, BECAUSE HE IS A LOT OF PUTINS AND BECAUSE INSIDE THE COUNTRY HE IS A LITTLE PUTIN !!!!!! wink wink wink