Military Review

Russian Aerospace Force received a new batch of Su-34 aircraft

35
The next batch of Su-34 front-line bombers has been transferred to the Russian Ministry of Defense as part of the 2017 state defense order of the year, Sukhoi reported on Monday.


Planes took off from the airfield of the Novosibirsk Chkalov Aviation Plant and headed to the place of their deployment
- According to the press service of "Sukhoi"

Russian Aerospace Force received a new batch of Su-34 aircraft


In total, this year’s state defense order provides for the delivery of X-NUMX Su-16 aircraft to the Russian Aerospace Force. This delivery is carried out within the framework of the second contract for the purchase of 34 aircraft of this type by the Russian Ministry of Defense. The first contract for the supply of 92 machines is fully implemented. In total, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation plans to purchase about 32 front-line bombers Su-200.

It is noted that the current government contract with the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation for the supply of Su-34 before 2020 to the Russian Aerospace Forces (VKS) of Russia ensures stable workload of the enterprise for the coming years and determines the prospects for long-term development.

Su-34 can carry up to eight tons of combat load, reach speeds of up to 1,9 thousand km / h, and its range is 4 thousand km. These bombers were involved in the antiterrorist operation in Syria.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. I doubt it
    I doubt it 20 November 2017 12: 50 New
    +1
    "In total, the Russian Ministry of Defense plans to purchase about 200 Su-34 front-line bombers."

    Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
    Or maybe less ...
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 20 November 2017 12: 53 New
      13
      I doubt it Today, 12:50 New
      "In total, the Russian Ministry of Defense plans to purchase about 200 Su-34 front-line bombers."
      Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
      Or maybe less ...

      ... and you recorded them all in kamikaze?!? ...
      1. 79807420129
        79807420129 20 November 2017 12: 56 New
        +8
        At least one good news today.
      2. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 20 November 2017 13: 02 New
        +8
        Quote: I doubt it
        Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
        Or maybe less ...

        With them, we plan to prevent a major war with global nuclear deterrence. But in regional conflicts like the Georgian or Syrian war, 200 Su-34s can become a decisive factor for a decisive turnaround and the defeat of an enemy like Turkey, for example.
    2. seti
      seti 20 November 2017 13: 00 New
      16
      Quote: I doubt it
      "Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
      Or maybe less ...

      You are a pessimist, my friend. Let me remind you that the Su-34 is not only a bomber, but also a fighter. So he will definitely be able to protect himself. By the way, do not tell me how many modern fighters and most importantly on the go are part of NATO countries? And how many of them can fly in our airspace in case of war?
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 20 November 2017 13: 05 New
        +1
        seti Today, 13:00 ↑ You are a pessimist, my friend. Let me remind you that the Su-34 is not only a bomber, but also a fighter. So he will definitely be able to protect himself. By the way, do not tell me how many modern fighters and most importantly on the go are part of NATO countries? And how many of them can fly in our airspace in case of war?

        . good ... this is really a husband’s conversation ...
      2. Sailor
        Sailor 20 November 2017 13: 08 New
        0
        And who will he bomb in our airspace? The SU-34 is primarily a bomber, and he cannot compete with a fighter. For 3-4 days, of course, you can destroy them all, but only at airfields, and as you know, they are well protected.
      3. avt
        avt 20 November 2017 13: 43 New
        +3
        Quote: seti
        Let me remind you that the Su-34 is not only a bomber, but also a fighter. T

        wassat This is si-il! bully Well, well, his forerunner, who was shown in Machulishchi, well, an alteration from the Su-27UB, which was done to the peak of Striker Igloo from Fu-15. And now it’s a classic front-line bomber and very, very successful and ... beautiful the infection! good It seems that by the number of photos and videos shown, I should have already gotten tired, but no! Glach rude as before. good
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. 44Serega44
      44Serega44 20 November 2017 13: 04 New
      +1
      Let them go through the Khibiny, and then we'll see.
    5. Scoun
      Scoun 20 November 2017 13: 09 New
      +6
      Quote: I doubt it
      Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
      Or maybe less ...

      I doubt that in these situations you will have time to meet any of them with bread and salt.
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... and you recorded them all in kamikaze?!? ...

      No, he’s probably just a schoolboy and doesn’t understand that with such losses in three four days, the defense mechanism for protecting the country is turned on and nuclear weapons (not the whole arsenal) enter into a “conversation” and no one will let the aggressor stomp like in 1941, he’s more likely he doesn’t even know that during the East 2010 exercises, the army worked out the element of detonating a nuclear mine on its territory. (West seems to be even earlier, after 08.08.08).
      PS.
      Worse than dressers, only one-day ones like -
      Quote: I doubt it
      Or maybe less ...
    6. Filxnumx
      Filxnumx 20 November 2017 13: 10 New
      +2
      But is more needed to end life on earth? How many Su-34s will lose the Russian Aerospace Forces in a nuclear missile war is a trifle not worth a second of discussion in this situation. Maybe on the third day there will be no North America if the “super-volcano” in Yellowstone wakes up “suddenly”
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 20 November 2017 13: 31 New
        0
        Filxnumx Today, 13: 10Maybe on the third day and there will be no North America, if "suddenly" wakes up a supervolcano in Yellowstone

        ... it’s absolutely true - “he will suddenly wake up” ... they are afraid of the fact that they’re afraid of ALL of them being washed away by the wave, and they will feed the crabs ...
      2. maiman61
        maiman61 20 November 2017 16: 38 New
        0
        Or a tsunami will wash away 60% of the mattress if Status 6 “accidentally” works.
    7. AlexG83
      AlexG83 20 November 2017 14: 21 New
      +1
      Quote: I doubt it
      "In total, the Russian Ministry of Defense plans to purchase about 200 Su-34 front-line bombers."

      Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.
      Or maybe less ...

      With such a batch, with such losses, it will come to the use of tactical nuclear weapons / nuclear weapons. So, what is next?
      1. Romario_Argo
        Romario_Argo 20 November 2017 15: 35 New
        +1
        Su-34 on the example of Syria work in our air defense zone
        а through the screen from Beech Tori, C-300В4, С-400 who the hell will fly
    8. bk316
      bk316 20 November 2017 16: 32 New
      +3
      Just in the first three, four days of the war with the PLA or NATO.

      thick trolling, quality.
      It’s worth remembering that the phrase is suitable for everything (1000 armatures, 5 tank armies, a millionth army ...)
    9. Ksi-14
      Ksi-14 20 November 2017 20: 12 New
      +1
      I’ll remind you, sir, that in 2008 one was enough to break the Georgian air defense like a Tuzik heating pad. And for information, Georgian troops were farmed according to the NATO model.
  2. volodya
    volodya 20 November 2017 12: 56 New
    +2
    Nata will again scream, Russia must be restrained!
  3. Vitas
    Vitas 20 November 2017 13: 26 New
    +1
    Gone today low in their nest!
  4. signifera
    signifera 20 November 2017 13: 40 New
    +2
    I live near the factory. Grandfather was the chief technologist there, a bunch of awards. It so happened that now I have a summer house near the aerodrome, where they are tested, one, two, three, four even fly, different shapes and low, everything is perfectly visible, everything can be seen with the naked eye, a bewitching spectacle, a roar such that it puts ears )))) smile They can’t even hang weapons, the enemies will soak up)))
  5. HEATHER
    HEATHER 20 November 2017 14: 28 New
    +4
    A hen on a grain! We grow in Aviation. And not only!
    1. parkello
      parkello 20 November 2017 14: 58 New
      +2
      how many are there already, more than a hundred, I think? this is quite a decent park, especially considering its capabilities. and 200 when it becomes, there will be a song in general!
  6. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 20 November 2017 15: 05 New
    0
    A completely pointless plane. Armor - a dead poultice. Only overweight.
    A bomb load and range decreases.
    Su-30s can do exactly the same as Su-34s. And faster and better, and get involved
    in an air battle, dropping bombs.
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 20 November 2017 15: 15 New
      +1
      Warrior! Something you are in pessimism today. Can I tell you that the machines are completely different in purpose? Su-30, a fighter for gaining superiority in the air. 34th, essentially a sickly bomber with elements of fighter capability. Or were upset about amersky 35's? Do not worry. Make friends with us, and you will be happy. You understand that without Russia, your conflict in the BV will not be solved. You are a bargaining chip for amers.
      1. voyaka uh
        voyaka uh 20 November 2017 15: 35 New
        0
        "essentially a sickly bomber with elements of fighter opportunity" ///

        That's just the point, that the FRAWN bomber. The same 8 tons as the Su-30. Reservation
        no one needs cabs at a height. But they will not be sent to the "attack".
        1. HEATHER
          HEATHER 20 November 2017 15: 39 New
          +1
          The 30th will not be sent. And the 34th for this and imprisoned. And in more detail, what is “frail”? Or so, to raise an exclamation? Booking
          no one needs cabs at a height.
          If that machine is designed to work from low altitudes. 800-1200 meters. In any case, the crew needs protection. Do you have such aircraft? (An-2 should not be steamed. Moreover, your praised 35th.)
          1. voyaka uh
            voyaka uh 20 November 2017 17: 16 New
            0
            No one has such aircraft. For the reasons I
            indicated above: they are not needed.
            1. askme
              askme 20 November 2017 19: 31 New
              +1
              Firstly, it is officially 8 tons, and unofficially up to 10-12 tons, and secondly, the Su-34 has a larger range and more powerful optical and radar systems (radiation pattern for working on the ground), specially sharpened for work on the ground, unlike multi-purpose machines. Teach a materiel, then umoyte. In addition, the Su-34 is twice cheaper than the Su-35 ...
              1. voyaka uh
                voyaka uh 20 November 2017 19: 34 New
                0
                "and a more powerful optical complex specialized in land." ///

                So they were recalled from Syria? wink The pilots complained that all the equipment in a row was out of order, and different planes had different breakdowns and defects.
                1. askme
                  askme 20 November 2017 20: 00 New
                  +1
                  Su-34 was recalled from Syria only your wet fantasies. Su-34s are constantly fighting in Syria and have shown themselves in Syria only on the best side.
                2. aszzz888
                  aszzz888 21 November 2017 02: 03 New
                  +1
                  voyaka uh Yesterday, 19: 34Pilots complained that all the equipment in a row was out of order, and different breakdowns and defects on different planes.
                  Reply Quote Complaint

                  ... besides Merikatos and your statements - there is other evidence?!?!? ... on the face - sweeping fake stuffing ...
  7. ASG7
    ASG7 20 November 2017 16: 54 New
    0
    And what about the concept of "su-24" (flying at very low altitudes as a prototype of Russian stealth technology) finally refused? Or is it so technologically complicated that for now we use the su-34 for these purposes.
  8. Old military officer
    Old military officer 20 November 2017 17: 42 New
    0
    Such news is always pleasant. We should have done more, but the liberal government cares more about its beloved and about those who actually appointed them. Guess who.
  9. datur
    datur 21 November 2017 01: 39 New
    0
    I love ducklings, but only such !!! the bigger, the better!!!!!! wink
  10. Alexander Abdrakhmanov
    Alexander Abdrakhmanov 21 November 2017 10: 53 New
    0
    For any opponent from Russia, a good gift awakens. On board will take 240 tons of useful military load. I think from such a gift nobody wakes anyone sweet, and it stops difficult to stop all the devastation, of course they ate something about the village.