The military situation in Syria: Americans do not give Assad to take Abu Kemal

Six Russian long-range Tu-22M3 bombers struck a massive blow at terrorist targets in the vicinity of Abu Kemal, where fighting is still ongoing. At the moment, the Syrian army controls no more than 60% of the total area of ​​the city. Statements of the capture of this important settlement were premature. Meanwhile, news Hezbollah’s resources report that US forces are doing everything in their power to prevent Abu Kemal’s surrender. It is reported that the US military is jamming Syrian communications and even blocking part of the airspace over the city.

Comments

[Orel]

Americans do not allow Assad to take Abu Kemal

If this were so, Assad would never have been taken, but it is not. They’ll take it soon. It's a question of time.

[Dashout]

A feeling of duality arises: a) the Russian Federation helps the Syrian army to destroy ISIS on its territory; b) The US is jamming Syrian communications and is even blocking part of the airspace over the city — are they blocking us? or are we here at all sideways ???

[Cxnumx]

Quote: Dashout

are they blocking us? or are we here at all sideways ???

Well, on earth, the Syrians, sometimes ours are in the air.

[Orel]

Quote: Dashout

b) The US is jamming Syrian communications and is even blocking part of the airspace over the city — are they blocking us? or are we here at all sideways ???

I doubt it. It is hard to believe that the United States has set a goal to protect ISIS, but at the same time they do not achieve this goal - there are no corresponding actions for this. Indeed, you must admit that if such a goal were, then the actions of the United States would be much more active, perhaps even with the decision to destroy government forces. This is not the same. Russia is not able to cover the entire Syria of air defense and, if the United States wanted, they could destroy all government forces with tomahawks alone. This is not the same.

Here, the matter is rather different. It is possible that in the neighborhood some operations of the USA or allies can go. Some interference can be created here and some kind of cross-casual damage and obstacles for the parties are possible.

I give you a star) It's nice when people try to argue with reason, and not slogans throw that enemies are around, the bloody west is eating babies or the bloody Assad is eating babies. Both propaganda extremes. Everything is much more complicated ..

[Hottabych]

Absolutely right! Everything is much more complicated ... Therefore, to take and fuck at the Syrian army, killing terrorists, some frames prevent them from tomahawks.))) By the way, the Americans are gradually pushing these frames. But I won’t argue, it seems to me that the West is not eating babies yet ...

[Eurodav]

Quote: Orel

Americans do not allow Assad to take Abu Kemal

If this were so, Assad would never have been taken, but it is not. They’ll take it soon. It's a question of time.

What a deep thought ...

[Fedya2017]

Someone or something always bothers a bad dancer ... There was simply nothing to lie prematurely about the capture of Abu Kemal, and now justify oneself.

[Alexander Prikhodko]

the usa, together with the igil, means also bandits and they must be destroyed by mistake or by accident, as they did before more than once

[Cyrus]

Maybe you are right...

[Belarus is Russia]

Soak these Americans in Syria then! Which exit??? In cold blood, they should be brutally wet in Syria, politely and calmly.

[mr fix]

You can’t do this, if you give the amers a priest, they will spree worse than any peanut and inflate from this a grandiose scammer saying that Assad so impinged on democracy and then IMHO they declare that it’s supposed that their war will begin and what they will take so long and persevere.

[Belarus is Russia]

So do-it is necessary. Otherwise, the Americans-they generally go down and say that Syria is their land.

[mr fix]

Quote: Orel

Quote: Dashout

b) The US is jamming Syrian communications and is even blocking part of the airspace over the city — are they blocking us? or are we here at all sideways ???

I doubt it. It is hard to believe that the United States has set a goal to protect ISIS, but at the same time they do not achieve this goal - there are no corresponding actions for this. Indeed, you must admit that if such a goal were, then the actions of the United States would be much more active, perhaps even with the decision to destroy government forces. This is not the same. Russia is not able to cover the entire Syria of air defense and, if the United States wanted, they could destroy all government forces with tomahawks alone. This is not the same.

Here, the matter is rather different. It is possible that in the neighborhood some operations of the USA or allies can go. Some interference can be created here and some kind of cross-casual damage and obstacles for the parties are possible.

I give you a star) It's nice when people try to argue with reason, and not slogans throw that enemies are around, the bloody west is eating babies or the bloody Assad is eating babies. Both propaganda extremes. Everything is much more complicated ..

And maybe both

[Dart]

Do not listen carefully to this, he likes to extol the possibilities of the "lights" and underestimate his "homeland", he has repeatedly noticed. So we are waiting for just good news.

[Sergey53]

. Around Abu Kemal, make a restricted area within a radius of 40 km for flying unidentified air means as they threaten the safety of the SAAR. Except VKS and Syria. Following the example of the padding around At-Tanf.

[hosse7]

So it's time to destroy the Americans in Syria as terrorists

[wasapip2010]

It was necessary immediately to announce to everyone that they would clean. Yankees and everyone else.
The Russians came to be afraid of everyone.

[Squint]

It was the fighting for Abu Kemal in its COMPLETENESS that revealed the US attitude towards the Igilovites as OWN formations. Based on the revealed facts of the clear support of the USA to the Ishilovites, Russia should PREPARE a revision of the agreement and openly declare to the American side about the new changes introduced in the bilateral agreement to combat IS. In which the conduct of any military operations by the United States may be permitted to the "US coalition" only Syria. Without permission they will be destroyed. Then the United States will be on the brink of war with the Syrian army and the whole world will discover the true presence of the United States in Syria! Then there may be reasons to brand the USA in Syria as an aggressor without any evidence! As for the use of tomahawks, the United States will not apply them without warning Russia, because Russia's objections will no doubt stop their use (although only about 30% of the entire set of US tomahawks are operational - practice has shown).