Su-34 in Lipetsk

Appeared on russianplanes.net is a recent photo session of the new X-4 bomber 34 red (serial number 10-02) of the 10 built in the Lipetsk 2011-th State Center for the training of aviation personnel and military tests. The aircraft was assigned to the 7000 air base at the Baltimore airfield (Voronezh), where the December 22 arrived, but since January 2012, along with other Baltimore Su-34, is in Lipetsk. Pictures taken on 29 March 2012 of the year.

Su-34 ("10 red"). Lipetsk, 29.03.2012 (c) Air Force Major / russianplanes.net

Su-34 ("10 red") and other Su-34. Lipetsk, 29.03.2012 (c) Air Force Major / russianplanes.net

Comments

[Dimitrxnumx]

I'm glad that such handsome men are protecting us! But still I would like to wish a peaceful sky.

[Ty3uk]

The new camouflage is much more effective!
Soul rejoices!

[VAF]

Quote: Dimitr77

I'm glad that such handsome men are protecting us!

Some good news went on aviation!

Everything and everything has already been expressed, but I am somewhere "stuck" and I think I will not repeat myself, and so everything was said correctly!

But not here. another good news drew and very !!!

the first production copy of the Su-35S fighter (tail number "01 black", serial number 01-01) of the Russian Air Force, filmed with a new guided air-to-air missile weapon suspended.
The aircraft carries two medium-range missiles RVV-SD under the fuselage and two short-range missiles RVV-MD under wingtips (although it is possible that the mock armament).
The picture was taken in March 2012 at the 929th State Flight Test Center of the Ministry of Defense of Russia in Akhtubinsk.

In the photo: Su-35S (tail number "01 black", serial number 01-01) of the Russian Air Force with a suspended new guided air-to-air missile weapon.

[Podojdi]

How good they are ... the eyes are not overjoyed.

[Vanek]

In a word - BEAUTY

[quaygon]

I am glad that a series of planes, helicopters, etc.

[AK-74-1]

I will join the estimates. Beautiful plane. Evidence that Russia is a great aviation power.

[Igor]

Why can not paint the entire plane in one color, what a pedo rainbow?

[Joker]

Blue from below to merge against the sky, black from above to merge against the earth. That's all. And you thought that their black paint is over?

[Focuser]

Don't you think this argument is slightly unconvincing? ..
Why is the nose of the plane white then? .. Does it unmask it? ..
And why with the exception of former countries. USSR nobody in the world so paints his technique? ..
The same Indonesia, India and Venezuela who bought our Dryers have the usual gray color ..
Do we have a patent that no one else can take advantage of such a "advantage" in disguise? ..
Or is it simply outdated and no longer gives any advantages?

[leon-iv]

Why is the nose of the plane white then? .. Does it unmask it? ..
KO hints about special material transparent for radio waves.
And why with the exception of former countries. USSR nobody in the world so paints his technique? ..
The same Indonesia, India and Venezuela who bought our Dryers have the usual gray color ..
Did the popuars fight a lot?

[Focuser]

KO goes through the woods! .. Because the visual masking is discussed here ..
And the "Papuans" may not have fought at all, but this does not mean that they do not have a head on their shoulders .. I mean, first of all, India .. And all NATO aircraft are also painted in the same color .. And they are the main instigators and participants in recent military conflicts ..

[leon-iv]

Yeah, only different colors have different transmission characteristics of radio waves. Do we need mirages in PNA?
And the "Papuans" may not have fought at all, but this does not mean that they do not have a head on their shoulders.
Yes, yes, but where can I get experience?
And all NATO aircraft are also painted in the same color .. And they are the main instigators and participants in recent military conflicts ..
They fought with the poits. And yes, the functions of IB and FB are somewhat different.

[Focuser]

Yeah, only different colors have different transmission characteristics of radio waves. Do we need mirages in PNA?
Well, let it be so .. But it puts an end to the whole undertaking with camouflage, isn't it? .. In this form, the plane has a part thanks to which it can easily be seen by a person visually and mechanically from satellites .. What's the rest disguised aircraft?
Yes, yes, but where can I get experience?
I don’t want to hurt you, but this is ridiculous .. People who are versed in the intricacies of military aircraft, conducting any kind of aviation exercises, will be able to deal with the most advantageous painting of the aircraft ..
They fought with the poits.
Again, even if you think, but did Russia fight with someone very serious? .. What would NATO have to have some knowledge of ...

Maybe just the tactics of conducting air combat are different for us with the same NATO, for example? Is this the reason?

[leon-iv]

o5!
But that puts an end to the whole disguise venture, doesn't it?
No, at the airdromes they are sheathed and, in the case of the DB, disguised.
and machine from satellites ..
where a hand smiled a face. see the list of OER satellites at ov.
I don’t want to hurt you, but this is ridiculous .. People who are versed in the intricacies of military aircraft, conducting any kind of aviation exercises, will not be able to figure out the most advantageous painting of the aircraft?
Once again, please indicate who has such a class of combat vehicles as FB
Again, even if you think, but did Russia fight with someone very serious? .. What would NATO have to have some knowledge of ...
WWII
Maybe just the tactics of conducting air combat are different for us with the same NATO, for example? Is this the reason?
I will repeat again so far that NATO is fighting with the poits. If you fight with real air defense, you will have to decline to WWI. And how do you think visual masking from MANPADS and anti-aircraft guns will help?

[Focuser]

The main countries of the current NATO bloc took part in WWII ..
And since you have gone so far, even after WWII there were at least two collisions between the USSR / USA (read NATO), so they know how aircraft should be painted no worse than ours, and here you are wrong ..

For the rest, I’m tired of arguing with you, because you can’t answer clearly and essentially .. You can only worry about emoticons and specify the class of military vehicles (although this doesn’t matter here in general) ..
Close the topic.

[Ty3uk]

Comrade Focker, you are wrong, and leon-iv explained it quite intelligibly to you.
1. Your words about satellites are really funny, because intelligence satellites are not created for this, but those that are simply not effective for detecting technology.
2. Disguise against the background of the earth is very effective in close air combat, as well as in operational deployment at unprepared airfields.
3. Aircraft such as our Su-34 or Su-25, except for amers, no one really has, so it’s not worth it to drag in other countries.

[leon-iv]

Except for amers, nobody really has planes like our Su-34 or Su-25, so you shouldn’t drag other countries.
Amers do not have FB only IB

[Ty3uk]

Well, in its pure form, the FB (Su-24) is also being replaced slowly.

[leon-iv]

no Su-34 is an FB that can be converted into a carrier of nuclear weapons. This is a continuation of the idea of ​​the Su-24 only on the new platform. Omerikachegov analogue was F-111

[Ty3uk]

But what about the ability of the Su-34 to conduct an air battle? Maybe all the same F-15E?

[leon-iv]

Chukchi is not a reader?
http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/man/uswpns/air/fighter/f4phantom.html
just remember that the phantom was for both the Navy and the Air Force.
And yes, after Vietnam, amers and Papuans only fought
For the rest, I’m tired of arguing with you, because you can’t answer clearly and essentially .. You can only worry about emoticons and specify the class of military vehicles (although this doesn’t matter here in general) ..
Close the topic.
What question is this and the answer

[Focuser]

Chukchi is just you

[Igorboss16]

such principles of painting make our planes a masterpiece, no one has

[Igor]

Quote: Joker

Blue from below to merge against the sky, black from above to merge against the earth.

And why is he such a disguise in the age of radar?

Quote: Joker

And you thought that their black paint is over?

I think that this is the machinations of the pedo-lobby, in general, hidden advertising.

[Ty3uk]

Quote: Igorek

And why is he such a disguise in the age of radar?

Camouflage is one way to ensure stealth.

[ikrut]

What a beautiful car! It has long been said that "a beautiful ship floats well."
May God grant this "bird" to fly beautifully and for a long time. For the joy of us, for the fear of the enemies.

[ward]

The predator ... handsome ... looks like a killer whale ... all in motion ... yes the plane should be beautiful ... plus ...

[patriot2]

This BIRD is capable of much, judging by its performance characteristics, which have already been voiced.
She has the teachings ahead, and then the moment of truth will happen. I believe that the pilots are ready, the cars too. The pictures are good, thanks +. Even better should be the following - from the training ground, we are waiting.

[kPoJluK2008]

And why is he such a disguise in the age of radar?

Nobody has canceled visual visibility in close combat.

[Igor]

Quote: kPoJluK2008

Nobody has canceled visual visibility in close combat.

And so they are painted in two different colors

Quote: Ty3uk

Camouflage is one way to ensure stealth.

It hardly applies to airplanes; other measures are needed there to achieve stealth.

[rolik]

Consider it a tribute to the tradition of painting military equipment in camouflage. In general, to reduce the visibility of the aircraft on the background of the earth.

[Ty3uk]

Quote: Igorek

It hardly applies to airplanes; other measures are needed there to achieve stealth.

It relates directly. These aircraft are operated from any aerodromes, even from unpaved ones. Therefore, ensuring stealth on the background of the earth is an objective requirement.

[Igor]

Quote: Ty3uk

It relates directly. These aircraft are operated from any aerodromes, even from unpaved ones. Therefore, ensuring stealth on the background of the earth is an objective requirement.

When the planes of NATO countries do not have radars, guidance systems, thermal imagers and they turn off all their spy satellites, and at the controls of their planes will sit pilots with IQ like Bush, who can take the Su-34 for a stone in the shape of a plane, then our plane will have a chance.

Quote: rolik

In general, to reduce the visibility of the aircraft on the background of the earth.

"I am a cloud, a cloud, a cloud I am not a bear at all" (c)

[kPoJluK2008]

Do you know why on the Su-27 they draw a cabin lantern from below?

And if you are not in the know, MANPADS are visually imposed.

[kPoJluK2008]

Do you know why on the Su-27 they draw a cabin lantern from below?

And if you are not in the know, MANPADS are visually imposed.

[kPoJluK2008]

http://www.missiles.ru/_foto/Lipetsk-2008-55/27/IMG_0725.jpg

[kPoJluK2008]

Do you know why the Su-27 at the bottom of the lantern is painted !?

Aiming MANPADS is made visually.

All close combat takes place visually, especially if it is maneuverable, visual visibility in the BVB is in the first place, here no "thermal imaging devices" will help you, if you clicked your beak - you will be shocked in a moment!

To argue with this is stupid and not to understand it is even more stupid.

Visual as well as radar, IR visibility - the need for a combat aircraft!

As for the Americans-drew attention to the matte paint of the aircraft at NATO, which does not glare in the sun, and even darkened cockpits? no? look and think why!

[Focuser]

Gennady, and you have something to do with the Russian Air Force, as I understand it? ..
Or did you read it all somewhere? ..

[kPoJluK2008]

Direct!
Aviation Engineer.

[Focuser]

Ah, well, great ..
Why did you paint our combat aircraft in two colors, you kind of explained, ok .. Can you then answer this question: Why then do the American military not do that? ..
Options like: do not know, did not think about it and so on. in the same vein are not suitable .. They are very pragmatic people and if repainting in two colors gives tangible advantages - this will be done ..

[Igor]

Quote: kPoJluK2008

Aiming MANPADS is made visually.

Quote: kPoJluK2008

All close combat takes place visually, especially if it is maneuverable, visual visibility in the BVB comes first

Well, then why paint the plane in two colors?

Quote: kPoJluK2008

Visual as well as radar, IR visibility - the need for a combat aircraft!

Then you need to paint the plane in one blue color.

Quote: kPoJluK2008

As for the Americans, he paid attention to the matte paint of NATO airplanes, which does not glare in the sun

So they paint the whole plane in one color.

[kPoJluK2008]

Igor, tie up with irony, like a little child!

Well, then why paint the plane in two colors?

And so they are painted in two different colors

They can be three, maybe four, or even a hundred, the main thing is that the camouflage would reduce visual visibility.
Our Air Force used this camouflage method already in WWII. All planes painted - blue bottom, green (or white, depending on the season) top!

In general, I gave a complete picture of the answer! For an intelligent person, there can no longer be questions ...

[kPoJluK2008]

And so they are painted in two different colors

They can be three, maybe four, or even a hundred, the main thing is that the camouflage would reduce visual visibility.
Our Air Force used this camouflage method already in WWII. All planes painted - blue bottom, green (or white, depending on the season) top!

[black_eagle]

Ay handsome !!!

[Trevis]

Wonderful plane! He struck me with versatility, maneuverability and reliability.
Here is another photo:

[kPoJluK2008]

I wonder why they constantly carry REPs with them at the end? ..

[leon-iv]

if you want to live, you’re not going so well (c)
In fact, this is only a small part of the electronic warfare complex for this aircraft.

[kPoJluK2008]

Yes, I know what it is!
Only they are removable, why do they fly with them? Here's what's interesting .. They are not needed to carry out a planned flight.

[Mikhado]

This is a multifunctional thing - a container for equipment and antennas, anti-flatter cargo. Or maybe for aerodynamics what it means - I don’t know for sure, for example, it prevents the flow stall, this is an assumption.

[leon-iv]

if you mean wingtips then these are the components of electronic warfare

[APASUS]

Good unit !!! Approved !!!

[Levonarmenia]

Su-34 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,