Military Review

Russia, China and Bolivia boycotted a meeting at the UN on Venezuela

29
Russia, China and Bolivia boycotted on Monday an informal meeting of the UN Security Council on the situation in Venezuela, organized by the American side, reports TASS.


Russia, China and Bolivia boycotted a meeting at the UN on Venezuela


Permanent representatives of the three countries with their Venezuelan counterpart Rafael Ramirez together went to journalists to protest against the American initiative.

Ramirez thanked his colleagues for solidarity, stressing that Venezuela "condemns the illegal nature of the informal meeting" and sees in it "interference in its internal affairs."

This is a clear violation of the principles and objectives laid down in the Charter of the United Nations. Very important countries such as Russia, China, Bolivia and Egypt were absent at the meeting, realizing that Venezuela is not on the agenda of the Security Council, since it does not pose a threat to international peace and security,
said ramirez.

Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation Vasily Nebenzya agreed with the Venezuelan diplomat, noting that “what is happening in Venezuela has nothing to do with the issues of peace and security that the UN Security Council must deal with”.

According to him, initiating such meetings, the “American side abuses the platform” of the Security Council, and also interferes in the internal affairs of a Latin American country.

We wish Venezuela to resolve its internal issues peacefully, without external interference. We do not think that at the moment the UN Security Council should deal with this issue,
tale Nebenzya.

The informal meeting of the Security Council was organized by the American delegation with the support of Italy, which is the chairman of the Security Council in November. The Secretary General of the Organization of American States Luis Almagro, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Raad Al-Hussein and the representative of the non-governmental human rights organization Foro Penal Julio Enriquez were invited to the meeting.

However, this event did not find broad support in the SC. As Ramirez later noted, “this meeting, according to the Arria formula, was a disaster, almost no one came to it.”
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. andre
    andre 14 November 2017 10: 10 New
    +3
    That damn survived, men with iron below the belt are gone. Some tolerant "ladies." Well, or brought something from Julio)) Enriques, white and fluffy powdery, but no one came to the banquet.
    I hope I will not get a ban from the site, for intolerance and not tolerance)).
    1. 210ox
      210ox 14 November 2017 10: 15 New
      10
      And so it is necessary to conduct with them ... Tough. And without hysteria, bend your line.
      1. The black
        The black 14 November 2017 10: 17 New
        +3
        Without China, Russia and the United States, any UN decision is an empty phrase ...
        1. 210ox
          210ox 14 November 2017 10: 24 New
          +2
          And it is an empty phrase with them .. Only often, by UN decisions, aggression is covered up. Which would have been without a UN decision ..
          Quote: Black
          Without China, Russia and the United States, any UN decision is an empty phrase ...
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 14 November 2017 10: 27 New
            +3
            It’s very good that the refusal countries to attend the UN Security Council meeting put the United States in its place, reminding everyone of the very essence of the UN Security Council meetings according to Arria’s formula - an exchange of opinions without any obviously biased official decisions that the United States intended to make!
            REFERENCE
            Meetings of UN Security Council members according to the Arria formula are informal confidential meetings organized by a member or members of the Security Council to conduct a private, frank exchange of views using a flexible procedural framework and with the participation of people who would be useful to hear and who they would like to then report.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Setrac
          Setrac 14 November 2017 22: 19 New
          0
          Quote: Black
          Without China, Russia and the United States, any UN decision is an empty phrase ...

          Let's just say this - without agreement between them.
          The UN is initially a deliberative body.
  2. aszzz888
    aszzz888 14 November 2017 10: 11 New
    +7
    ... once again shaved mericatos! ... laughing
    1. Partyzan
      Partyzan 14 November 2017 10: 14 New
      +6
      Quote: aszzz888
      ... once again shaved mericatos! ... laughing

      they are arrogant, they will continue to climb, now they’ll come up with something new
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 14 November 2017 10: 22 New
        +3
        Partyzan Today, 10:14 ... they are arrogant, they will continue to climb, now they’ll come up with something new

        hi ! ... here we have to come up with a new nut, with a new thread ... bully
        1. Partyzan
          Partyzan 14 November 2017 12: 24 New
          +6
          Quote: aszzz888
          here it is necessary to come up with a new nut, with a new thread ...

          they have a nut, we need to send a bolt there
      2. Alexanast
        Alexanast 14 November 2017 12: 08 New
        +8
        Quote: Partyzan
        now come up with something new


        So since the beginning of the 20th century they haven’t come up with anything new hi
        1. Partyzan
          Partyzan 14 November 2017 13: 01 New
          +4
          Quote: Alexanast
          So since the beginning of the 20th century they haven’t come up with anything new

          but what interpretation laughing
          1. Alexanast
            Alexanast 14 November 2017 15: 23 New
            +8
            Quote: Partyzan
            but what interpretation

            Well, when the old training manual fails and does not work, the hosh is not the hosh, but you have to spin like a louse on the crest - to interpret ... laughing wassat
    2. Jedi
      Jedi 14 November 2017 10: 16 New
      +7
      Greetings! hi It is necessary to chop all their initiatives in the bud so that they do not revel in their exclusivity and permissiveness. yes
      1. aszzz888
        aszzz888 14 November 2017 10: 19 New
        +1
        Jedi Today, 10:16 ↑ New ... Everything is necessary their initiatives chop on the vine ...

        And you don’t get sick, hi! ... and not just "initiatives" ... angry
        1. Jedi
          Jedi 14 November 2017 10: 23 New
          +5
          We got used to the fact that everyone indulges their desires, it is time to know the honor! Although what am I talking about? The USA and the “honor” are even absurd to put next to ...
          1. aszzz888
            aszzz888 14 November 2017 10: 30 New
            +1
            .. since the days of the Wild West, those who arrived to conquer it, the main argument was "Colt" ... since then, the merikatos, nothing has changed ... bully
            1. Jedi
              Jedi 14 November 2017 10: 42 New
              +4
              So after all heredity. It is enough to recall from which rabble that the USA is now called predominantly formed.
  3. svp67
    svp67 14 November 2017 10: 16 New
    +4
    Once the USSR already boycotted a meeting in the UN Security Council, as a result, UN troops, led by the United States, were sent to Korea. We must be very careful about boycotts ...
    1. destination
      destination 14 November 2017 10: 20 New
      +3
      It's nice to read a balanced and smart comment, thanks ... hi And that’s all
    2. Same lech
      Same lech 14 November 2017 10: 23 New
      +2
      The United Nations forces, led by the United States, were sent to Korea.


      The Chinese have their own troops ... the USSR their fliers ... in the end, two Koreas.
      You cannot interfere in the internal affairs of other countries without the will of their peoples.
      1. Blackmokona
        Blackmokona 14 November 2017 10: 48 New
        +1
        Two Koreas existed before the Korean War
    3. Guillon
      Guillon 14 November 2017 10: 25 New
      +3
      So what!? We got snot stripes in Korea, in full! bully hi
      And they will survive - they will get it again! wassat
    4. sogdy
      sogdy 14 November 2017 11: 09 New
      0
      Quote: svp67
      Once the USSR already boycotted a meeting in the UN Security Council, as a result, UN troops, led by the United States, were sent to Korea

      Parallel reality? Or - maybe it will slip through?
  4. Egorovich
    Egorovich 14 November 2017 10: 23 New
    +9
    More often it is necessary to lower mattress covers on the sinful earth.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 14 November 2017 10: 33 New
    +2
    This is a clear violation of the principles and objectives of the Charter of the United Nations.

    And when was the last time Americans thought about the principles and goals of the UN? For them, the main thing is their goals, which must be pushed through this organization. Without Russia and China, all conversations are really empty words, let alone informal ones.
  6. The Siberian barber
    The Siberian barber 14 November 2017 10: 38 New
    +2
    The degree to which the United States is concerned about democracy and human rights is directly proportional to the amount of hydrocarbons found in the country that Sauron’s eye fell on.
  7. osoboye_mneniye
    osoboye_mneniye 14 November 2017 22: 33 New
    0
    Always in such cases it is interesting why Bolivia, and not Honduras))
    And then Bolivia will be yapping at America and telling how in that joke about the comrade who talked with Lenin himself in a public bathhouse))
  8. polpot
    polpot 14 November 2017 23: 06 New
    0
    It's time for the UN to move to Shanghai