In the United States prepared a plan for the deployment of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass

62
Washington has prepared and intends to propose for discussion a plan for the deployment in the east of Ukraine of 20-ti of thousands of international peacekeepers, reports RIA News Post by the Wall Street Journal.





Earlier, the Russian president stated that he supported the idea of ​​sending an armed UN contingent to the Donbass, but this can only be a security function of the OSCE mission, and the “blue helmets” should be located exclusively on the contact line of the parties. Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov at the same time called Moscow’s position on peacekeepers "flexible."

According to the newspaper, the US Special Representative for Ukraine Kurt Volker, who had previously found an interesting proposal on the deployment of peacekeeping forces, said that he “discussed with the Russian presidential aide Vladislav Surkov the possibilities for developing the initiative to ensure border control and monitoring of heavy weapons.”

“Washington’s proposal is intended to test the seriousness of Moscow’s intentions,” the publication adds.

In addition, Western diplomats believe that the UN contingent should act not under a UN mandate, but under the auspices of the OSCE, whose observers are already in eastern Ukraine.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    10 November 2017 10: 27
    “Washington's proposal is designed to verify the seriousness of Moscow’s intentions”
    But the intentions of the United States and do not need to check ... sad
    1. +15
      10 November 2017 10: 27
      Washington has prepared and intends to propose for discussion a plan for the deployment of 20 thousand international peacekeepers in eastern Ukraine

      There is no doubt that in the American plan, peacekeepers should be located on the Russian border. And the figure of 20 thousand is suspicious. negative
      1. +3
        10 November 2017 10: 30
        Quote: Jedi
        should be located on the Russian border. And the figure of 20 thousand is suspicious.

        I wrote above that their intentions should not be checked. Before that, they did not seem to share the idea ... but they found a loophole in the words
        "Discussed with the assistant to the Russian president Vladislav Surkov opportunities to develop initiatives to ensure border control and monitoring of heavy weapons».
        1. +10
          10 November 2017 10: 35
          Here also these words say a lot:
          “Washington's proposal is designed to verify the seriousness of Moscow’s intentions”

          The United States is cramming into its plan proposals that are obviously unacceptable for Russia, Russia will not support such a plan, and the United States will trumpet the whole world "You see, we offered, but the Russians refused, they want to enslave Ukraine!" and stuff like that. am
          1. +6
            10 November 2017 11: 24
            Quote: Jedi

            The US is cramming into its plan proposals that are obviously unacceptable to Russia, Russia will not support such a plan , and the United States trumpet the whole world "You see - we offered, and the Russians refused ....

            The worst thing is if the Russian leadership supports this plan .. States may type to meet Russia and agree to some conditions we meet to give our authorities a face on the eve of the election. But then they will surely throw us. The result is the end of LDNR, the prestige of Russia will collapse below the plinth, and a NATO strike group with missiles of any range and missile defense systems will appear near our border.
            1. +6
              10 November 2017 11: 30
              hi
              You write correctly and I hope that those at the top understand this too.
              Quote: DMB_95
              To prevent this from happening, the Russian government must begin to behave harsher than tin.

              There is such an alloy "win". good
              1. +1
                10 November 2017 12: 07
                Washington has prepared and intends to propose for discussion a plan for the deployment of 20 thousand international peacekeepers in eastern Ukraine,

                Volunteers in the Pentagon are completely overwhelmed!
                20 thousand UN peacekeepers in the Donbass? !!! Yes, these are direct occupation forces of NATO under the leadership of the Pentagon to clean up the population of the DPR and LPR!
                Walker, at least for decency in the Pentagon, reduced the design figure of 20 thousand UN peacekeepers!
                Well, the completely militarized US militarists consider all people fools!
                1. +5
                  10 November 2017 12: 13
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Yes, these are direct NATO occupation forces under the leadership of the Pentagon to clean up the DNI and LC!

                  Well, the United States needs to at least somehow blame Russia for the failure of American plans for Syria ... So also, in passing, close to the border. How to miss such a lure?
                  1. +1
                    10 November 2017 12: 24
                    The Pentagon from Syria took its bandits from all over the world - and now he decided to send them to bloody work in Ukraine so that these villains do not stagnate without work and without a salary, otherwise they will scatter around the whole world at the Pentagon! Collect the Pentagon afterwards! The Pentagon will take much more time and money! The Pentagon’s mobility in their leadership is lost.
                    And where 20 thousand, there will be 120 thousand!
                    The main thing for American scumbags such as Walker is that through McCain and his ilk, official permission and money from the State Department and the US Congress to “knock out” this pile of idlers to the Pentagon!
                    1. +5
                      10 November 2017 12: 27
                      For the sake of profit, they would have sold their souls, but there isn’t there - one steam is stinky. Geeks - I can’t find another decent word.
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. +1
                  10 November 2017 13: 59
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Well, the completely militarized US militarists consider all people fools!


                  Hey.
                  Yes, they do. Why are you surprised? This is the Anglo-Saxons with their incredible fanabery and "octopus" tactics (where the tentacle stuck in, there - woo-a-la, the whole octopus).
        2. +11
          10 November 2017 10: 35
          What to worry about, there is always a “veto right” behind us!
          There are other concerns:
          Where are the guarantees that if the contingent is American, they will not begin military operations against the unrecognized republics? Even from the demarcation line ...
          1. +13
            10 November 2017 10: 45
            Quote: Anarchist
            Where are the guarantees that if the contingent is American, they will not begin military operations against the unrecognized republics? Even from the demarcation line ...

            Warranties from Americans request This is a joke, only sad hi
          2. +5
            10 November 2017 10: 46
            There is no such guarantee, and it is not known what the United States has written about in terms of contingent composition.
            1. +10
              10 November 2017 10: 51
              The composition, I think, is understandable: all fascists and Russophobes from the nearest Republics! I don’t exclude even Georgians ... But all this is the American contingent, because the command in Washington!
              1. +6
                10 November 2017 10: 56
                We will not run ahead of the steam locomotive - we will wait when the United States makes its plan. wink
                1. +10
                  10 November 2017 11: 05
                  Quote: Jedi
                  wait for the US to make its plan.

                  No, I won’t wait! I'm already on the `` tricky plan '' hooked! lol
                  1. +5
                    10 November 2017 11: 12
                    You just don’t drive pink elephants - wait until they let go, the elephants themselves will leave. wassat
          3. +6
            10 November 2017 10: 51
            Quote: Anarchist
            What to worry about, there is always a “veto right” behind us!

            They will find a loophole, they will bypass it, or they will introduce it without UN sanction ... in any case, everything will be according to the American scenario, I think the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation has an understanding and a plan of action.
            Quote: Anarchist
            Where are the guarantees that if the contingent is American, they will not begin military operations against the unrecognized republics? Even from the demarcation line ...

            They will be introduced for this. The mission is not cheap, they won’t wrinkle bread for a long time, they will enter the region, organize a provocation and go ahead, attack! But the Americans will be at headquarters, in the infantry there will be vassals from eastern Europe, all sorts of Baltic ...
            Everyone understands that the United States does not need the world at the borders of the Russian Federation, they will act.
          4. 0
            10 November 2017 11: 02
            contingent must be Polish, Hungarian and Romanian laughing
      2. +1
        10 November 2017 10: 52
        There is nothing to trample on the useless Russian land ... There can only be one guarantor army of Russia!
        Quote: Jedi
        Washington has prepared and intends to propose for discussion a plan for the deployment of 20 thousand international peacekeepers in eastern Ukraine

        There is no doubt that in the American plan, peacekeepers should be located on the Russian border. And the figure of 20 thousand is suspicious. negative
        1. +6
          10 November 2017 10: 55
          Quote: 210ox
          There is nothing to trample on the useless Russian land ..

          I agree, nothing. But these exceptional things cannot be missed by these exceptional ones.
      3. +13
        10 November 2017 10: 53
        To go about the amers is to put the jackals to guard the rabbits.
        1. +7
          10 November 2017 11: 13
          Nothing good will come of this, except for a delicious dinner for the jackals.
      4. +5
        10 November 2017 11: 57
        Quote: Jedi
        And the figure of 20 thousand is suspicious.

        Max hi , yet I did not understand, the exercises in the amount of 17 thousand is an act of aggression, and the contingent of 20 thousand is a peacekeeping mission? wonderful are your deeds request
        1. +5
          10 November 2017 12: 02
          Volodya, hello! hi Here I am about the same. Again mattresses under the guise of peaceful intentions strive closer to the border of the Russian Federation to become. am
          1. +5
            10 November 2017 12: 08
            Quote: Jedi
            Again mattresses under the guise of peaceful intentions

            can raise the issue of the indigenous people of north america? let the same begin to defend, not all of us
            1. +4
              10 November 2017 12: 16
              This is a great idea, someone has already suggested. You can also recall how the United States did with Americans of Japanese descent after Pearl Harbor, the annexation of Hawaii, and much more. bully
    2. +2
      10 November 2017 10: 35
      Where 20 thousand then ??? 2 full infantry divisions to our borders ?????
      1. +2
        10 November 2017 10: 38
        Quote: Shura Perm
        Where 20 thousand then ??? 2 full infantry divisions to our borders ?????

        Each OSCE will be assigned a second charge ... smile
        Earlier, the Russian president stated that he supported the idea of ​​sending the UN armed contingent to the Donbass, but we can only talk about the security function of the OSCE mission,
    3. +2
      10 November 2017 10: 41
      Quote: NIKNN
      and no need to check ...


      Sarcasm, however ... Yes what

      hi
      1. +2
        10 November 2017 10: 51
        Quote: Vanek
        Sarcasm, however ...

        hi
    4. +7
      10 November 2017 10: 43
      Quote: NIKNN
      But the intentions of the United States and do not need to check ...

      This is for sure Nikolay hi
      Washington has prepared and intends to propose for discussion a plan for the deployment of 20 thousand international peacekeepers in eastern Ukraine,

      More like a plan for deploying a military contingent at our borders for a throw. hi
      1. +10
        10 November 2017 10: 47
        Volodya hi , this contingent in the Baltic States and Poland has long been worth it! Close up ...
        But we cannot be surrounded! From that Russia and the `` immense ''!
        1. +7
          10 November 2017 11: 06
          Quote: Anarchist
          Volodya, this contingent in the Baltic states and Poland has been standing for a long time! Close up ...

          The closure they have will be a little short, but an alarming symptom however. what Yasen Stump Sanya wants to kill two birds with one stone, the Republic to kill and place a contingent in the southeast, in the direction of strikes. hi drinks
  2. 0
    10 November 2017 10: 30
    Now it becomes clear why the Americans "asked" not to place their project on the Ukrainian side. There is nothing for the Ukrainians to climb ahead of the Americans - whatever they say, they will do it.)))
  3. +6
    10 November 2017 10: 30
    plan for the deployment of 20 thousand international peacekeepers in eastern Ukraine

    I understand that they want to create an American cemetery in the Donbass?
    1. +11
      10 November 2017 10: 33
      This is fraught with great consequences ... On a global scale!
      1. +1
        10 November 2017 11: 08
        Greetings! We read carefully - not the introduction of 20 thousand into the country, but the deployment of 20 thousand in this territory !!! There is a difference? wink
    2. jjj
      +2
      10 November 2017 10: 33
      Green lawn with white posts
    3. +3
      10 November 2017 10: 55
      Quote: pvv113
      I understand that they want to create an American cemetery in the Donbass?

      The Yankees themselves will not go into the infantry, and I wouldn’t be so sure of the outcome ... Without the help of the Russian Federation, LDNR will not stand, and in the case of open military assistance, the Russian Federation will be an aggressor, and in this case, our borders already have prepared armada of NATO ... The main thing is not to break hot heads. Composure.
  4. +4
    10 November 2017 10: 31
    In the United States prepared a plan for the deployment of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass
    Question: If the plan for the deployment of UN peacekeepers in the Donbass will be put into practice. Then why in early 2015, LDNR troops stopped in the suburbs of cities? Subjecting them from the side of the APU to constant shelling. Why put so many lives ?! And soldiers and civilians! For what?! Why was it impossible to drive out the APU, which had been defeated at that time, to the borders of regions in the steppe?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      10 November 2017 11: 10
      LDNR and ask.
      And stupid hints - this is to your curator.
  5. +1
    10 November 2017 10: 32
    Well, if you take into account how much equipment they transferred to Poland and the Baltic states, then probably they will have enough. Everything seems to add up to them. Or how?
  6. +7
    10 November 2017 10: 34
    20 of thousands of "peacekeepers" for the occupation of LDNR and subsequent genocide. For nothing more.
    In general, the coast has already been lost.
    1. +1
      10 November 2017 10: 37
      I thought so too. This is an occupation on a plausible pretext.
      1. +2
        10 November 2017 11: 25
        It is obvious. They demand the deployment of "peacekeepers" in the territory of Donbass right up to the border of the Russian Federation and taking the border under control. Do not forget that the Buryatian diving armored cavalry "heroically repulsed the attacks" in the atomic force, and they have already destroyed the 76 Airborne Division several times without exception. It is necessary to prevent "reinforcements" in the form of some "Chukchi tank climbers" on the "Ukrainian land"
  7. 0
    10 November 2017 10: 36
    20 - NATO will become even closer to the borders of the Russian Federation
  8. +1
    10 November 2017 10: 37
    The question is, why do they need as many as 20 thousand “invincible”? They now have about 12 thousand in Afghanistan.
  9. 0
    10 November 2017 10: 41
    Actually, on your plans, Russia, by and large, goes to the toilet - oh America. and observers will be from our side - people who are not under the power of corrupt structures.
    1. 0
      10 November 2017 11: 09
      Did I say something unlawful?
      1. 0
        10 November 2017 11: 19
        I respect any religion and the opinions of any people and what to do with it, I have the honor
        ..
  10. +1
    10 November 2017 10: 50
    It remains to ask LDNR.
  11. HAM
    0
    10 November 2017 10: 57
    Well, they would immediately introduce "white helmets", why is it hypocritical ??
  12. +1
    10 November 2017 11: 09
    Quote: Shura Perm
    Where 20 thousand then ??? 2 full infantry divisions to our borders ?????

    They will stand along the border, holding hands.
  13. +2
    10 November 2017 12: 24
    Any option, when Bandera is not destroyed, and Russia does not control the territory of the former Ukraine, are lost and stupid. This is another retreat. In any case, this is a drain. The drain of millions of Russian people and the beginning of the collapse of Russia.
    1. +2
      10 November 2017 13: 58
      Suggestions? What would you do?
  14. +1
    10 November 2017 12: 42
    If Walker considers all this possible, then doubts arise about his mental abilities. Of particular interest is his thesis on border control with Russia and the fact that the OSCE will be led by the OSCE, led by Poroshenko. Oil painting.
  15. 0
    10 November 2017 13: 48
    hi But I’m wondering If you place them All 20 thousand Then where will they run when piz..y will start to receive from the DNI? To Russia? like the dill army at one time Remember? sad
  16. 0
    10 November 2017 20: 27
    The slanting Egorka (OSCE) has a very keen eye, one trouble - he was looking in the wrong direction ...
  17. +4
    11 November 2017 21: 22
    Nobody will let anyone in to us. The news is another duck.
  18. 0
    11 November 2017 22: 38
    Who was the initiator of the deployment of peacekeepers? Does anyone remember? And where is how much and whom is the most important - who? ..that who needs everything? Where is the USA, and where is their promised land in case of the eruption of the Yellowstone volcano.