Military Review

The general designer of Kamov told how helicopters will change in 50 years

33
The development of combat vehicles will be conducted in many directions, including the improvement of equipment, which helps to carry out both flight mode and combat work.


Through 30 – 50, for years, helicopters will get much more automation of flight modes and will be able to maneuver at very high speeds, said Sergei Mikheev, designer of Kamov, in an interview with the Zvezda TV channel website.

“The development of combat helicopters will undoubtedly be the basis for the re-equipment of the modern armed forces, since the helicopter in its capacity today represents a unique opportunity to act quickly, covertly and effectively. In this regard, military helicopters have an exceptionally good future, ”Mikheyev believes.

Read and watch the interview in full on the site "Star" - The general designer of Kamov told how helicopters will change in 50 years
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Grandfather
    Grandfather 3 November 2017 07: 04
    +2
    The general designer of Kamov told how helicopters will change in 50 years
    Hmm ... a helicopter, and after 50 years it will be a helicopter ... by definition.
    1. FID
      FID 3 November 2017 08: 26
      +4
      Yes, and I want to continue ... Control systems will remain control systems ....
      1. maxim947
        maxim947 3 November 2017 11: 13
        0
        There will be a fight against convertiplanes and the latter will win
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 3 November 2017 14: 27
          0
          Quote: maxim947
          There will be a fight against convertiplanes and the latter will win

          There will be a war with aircraft combining the speed and fuel efficiency of the aircraft and vertical takeoff / landing and hovering of the helicopter. And yet yes, the convertiplanes will win in military transport aviation. The only question is who will win the assault.
          1. maxim947
            maxim947 3 November 2017 14: 32
            0
            They seem to have to win, the load and speed are higher.
            1. ProkletyiPirat
              ProkletyiPirat 3 November 2017 16: 20
              0
              Quote: maxim947
              They seem to have to win, the load and speed are higher.

              1) in military transport aviation - guaranteed yes (as soon as the engine-gearbox-propeller bunch is remade)
              2) in attack aircraft - maybe yes, or maybe not - the longitudinal and transverse helicopter schemes have poor maneuverability, and this is a key element when using terrain folds. Here, so far, helicopters with a pushing element and VTOL are in the lead on the LTX.
              1. maxim947
                maxim947 3 November 2017 19: 10
                0
                To date, yes.
      2. tracer
        tracer 9 November 2017 06: 01
        0
        The blades will probably also run in a circle and blow air)))
    2. Buffet
      Buffet 3 November 2017 09: 12
      +1
      It seems to me that a gravitsap and pepelats will appear laughing but seriously, it seems to me that the plane and the helicopter will unite, the helicopter with or near the speed of the plane, and the plane with the possibility of vertical take-off and landing, and the helicopter (or as it will be called) will be on jet thrust, unless new principles of movement appear .
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 3 November 2017 15: 14
        +1
        It is absolutely true that the differences between helicopters and airplanes will disappear. Because the new mover will allow completely new to realize the possibility of moving in space
        1. tracer
          tracer 9 November 2017 06: 06
          0
          Yeah ... schazzzz. In Europe, differences have disappeared, and why? Well, now it allows them ..... to realize "completely new" possibilities of movement in space.
  2. Nitarius
    Nitarius 3 November 2017 09: 24
    +2
    for a long time everything is .. the question is only who does not give an implementation!
    1. Ren
      Ren 3 November 2017 11: 09
      0
      Enlighten, please, what kind of gravitap is this? Where can I read, pick up the mind? hi
      1. Karelof
        Karelof 3 November 2017 11: 21
        0
        https://cont.ws/@aleksandr88/334832
      2. NIKNN
        NIKNN 3 November 2017 11: 25
        +1
        http://scpfoundation.ru/scp-051-arc
        Here is a more modern version
        1. ProkletyiPirat
          ProkletyiPirat 3 November 2017 14: 34
          0
          This conceptual model has long been invented and discarded, due to the fact that
          1) 90% of the volume is occupied by equipment and not by payload
          2) Limitations on payload which cannot be solved
  3. iouris
    iouris 3 November 2017 14: 50
    0
    And what will people look like in twenty years?
  4. gridasov
    gridasov 3 November 2017 15: 11
    +1
    What everyone is talking about and what kind of perspective can be discussed if no one understands the physical nature of the energy process that occurs on the propellers or propeller blades. No one is even able to hear that it is necessary to change the algorithms of the physical process in order to create and use such a physical process in which an increase in the speed of rotation of the movers, the moment of rotation on the shaft will not require an increase in the applied work on the rotation of this mover And only after understanding the essence of this process, and he it’s already comprehended and there is a methodology for its analysis and a calculation methodology, we can talk about a breakthrough forward. Therefore, it can now be said with full confidence that the level, even of all taken together, of the general designers of all countries cannot know how exactly and in what way this future will be built.
    1. Ace Tambourine
      Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 14: 36
      0
      Gridasov ...
      Are you scoring glasses again in Europe?
      1. gridasov
        gridasov 5 November 2017 15: 30
        +1
        No ! But I don’t think it has any meaning at all.
  5. Div Divich
    Div Divich 5 November 2017 14: 50
    0
    The helicopter is built around the engine, what the engine will be, such capabilities will be in the helicopter.

    So let's follow the development of aircraft engines.

    Those who have better engines will win.
    1. gridasov
      gridasov 5 November 2017 15: 32
      +1
      I would clarify that the displacement body is formed around the mover, and the engine provides controllability of the mover's work with the environment.
      1. Ace Tambourine
        Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 15: 37
        0
        Yes, at least get it wrong ... but you won’t be able to combine the plane and the helicopter, and the point is not even in the propulsors, but in principle ...
        IT IS EASIER TO THINK A FLYING PLATE ...
        1. gridasov
          gridasov 5 November 2017 15: 41
          +1
          You absolutely correctly say !!! But before this, many do not even think that the potential capabilities of the propulsion system will determine all the other forms and technical solutions for the aircraft. But we, after all, are talking first about the key elements of what the creation of a new engine and propulsion can determine. What is it ? The correct physical process is constructed in such a way that it is clear why and how a device for obtaining this process should be created
          1. Ace Tambourine
            Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 15: 47
            0
            And figs here to think ... gravitsapu and Lutz with a margin. and alga, communism ...
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 5 November 2017 15: 51
              0
              That's how everyone thinks that everyone can be able to know and be able to, no. . It is not that simple .
          2. Ace Tambourine
            Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 15: 55
            0
            But in general the question ...
            Well, let's say a flying saucer (well, this is our classification), is it an aircraft or what?
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 5 November 2017 16: 05
              0
              According to the logic of reasoning, “Flying Saucer” is an Object of more effective movement in space than people imagine. In addition, we must first recognize that such objects are real and only then it will be possible to focus not on our own achievements or the achievements of our opponents. but for those who still use technologies that we don’t know anything about. . Therefore, I am sympathetic to the fact that the vast majority of people do not even believe in what I am talking about, much less want to understand. But it is precisely about such breakthrough technologies that we are talking about that bring us closer to the technologies of more developed minds.
              1. Ace Tambourine
                Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 16: 07
                0
                Hey ... The owner of the bot under Nick Gridasov ... You should at least learn something ...
                1. gridasov
                  gridasov 5 November 2017 16: 09
                  0
                  Why? Specify more specifically.
                  1. Ace Tambourine
                    Ace Tambourine 5 November 2017 16: 10
                    0
                    I have nothing to talk about with you, skeleton ...
  6. Div Divich
    Div Divich 5 November 2017 16: 30
    0
    Balloons in vain left to develop, they had technology to conquer the gravity of the earth. They are like whales in the ocean can swim in the air. Air vehicles followed the path of insects (helicopters) and birds (planes).

    Balloons may not land on the ground, but simply hang in the air and lower and lift people through the elevator, but flying houses can be done, only the wind can blow them.
    1. Setrac
      Setrac 5 November 2017 20: 42
      0
      Quote: Divan Divanych
      Balloons may not land on the ground, but simply hang in the air and lower and lift people through the elevator, but flying houses can be done, only the wind can blow them.

      And still their streams cut paper like scissors.