Russian President ratified agreement with Minsk on joint provision of troops

25
Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a federal law on ratification of an agreement between the governments of the Russian Federation and Belarus on the joint technical support of the regional grouping of troops (RGV), reports TASS with reference to the legal information portal.



To ratify the agreement between the government of the Russian Federation and the government of the Republic of Belarus on joint technical support of the regional group of troops of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus, signed in Minsk on November 2 on November 2016,
says the text of the law.

In addition, the head of state signed amendments to the agreement between Russia and the Republic of Belarus on the joint protection of the external border of the Union State in airspace and the creation of a unified air defense system of the two countries from February 3 2009.

Both laws were passed by the State Duma on October 20 2017 of the year and approved by the Federation Council on October 25.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    31 October 2017 11: 10
    Interestingly, what was discussed on the basis of the videoconferencing base in Belarus? Or did you decide to push this idea?
    1. +5
      31 October 2017 11: 17
      I suppose what was to be discussed was discussed. And this should not interest anyone, including the "deeply interested" neighbors ".
    2. +1
      31 October 2017 11: 22
      Quote: ImPerts
      Interestingly, what was discussed on the basis of the videoconferencing base in Belarus? Or did you decide to push this idea?

      And what should I put there from the air regiments? After all, even on the main bases, the regiments are equipped with new Su by the piece (two will be transferred, then four), which means they are incomplete regiments. Belarus itself must cope in its area of ​​responsibility in peacetime, and during joint exercises Our fighters are based on their airfields without any problems.
  2. +8
    31 October 2017 11: 11
    In other words, now Lukashenka’s army will be supplied at the expense of the Russian Federation and to the detriment of the Russian Federation, just as today, more than 50% at the expense of Russia, without any benefit to Russia, the allegedly allied state with Minsk is being supplied, which does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation and even the film Crimea forbids showing on its territory ... Putin must retire ...
    1. +11
      31 October 2017 11: 26
      They also forgot to mention about “poor pensioners” and “sick children”. It will not supply Russia - it will supply NATO. The border of Belarus is, count, the border of Russia.
      1. +5
        31 October 2017 11: 30
        Well, let NATO supply them, all the more so since the red-and-white people in Belarus are the same Bandera ... But it would also be nice to think about children in Russia, about their children, and not about the children of foreign states ... And you need to restore the city of Charonda in Russia, because it’s a 13th-century architectural monument, not the Syrian Palmyra ... Such as you gave Ukraine more than $ 3 billion to the detriment of Russia, it may be enough to tear 5 skins from Russia in order to feed any independent from Russia at its expense states that should live at their own expense, and not at the expense of the Russian Federation, since they are so independent ?!
        1. +8
          31 October 2017 11: 43
          Quote: Nemesis
          Let NATO supply them

          And may NATO move even closer to Russia's borders? You reason very well - "to surrender everyone, even though NTO is based in Rostov, but if only they would pay me a bigger pension."
          1. +3
            31 October 2017 11: 46
            All former republics of the USSR are sick with Russophobia and unreliable. Rather than spending money on them, it is better to spend them on Russia ... But Minsk, like a wolf, no matter how you feed, still looks into the forest, regularly shouting about its independence and often pursuing a policy that is frankly not friendly to the Russian Federation
      2. 0
        1 November 2017 10: 39
        Deep delusion. The border of Belarus is not the border of Russia at all. For Belarus, without any consultation with Russia, has opened a unilateral visa-free visa for almost a hundred countries of the world. And these tours will be able to illegally enter Russia through a transparent border with the Republic of Belarus, as a result of which voices are already heard in Russia about the introduction of a visa regime and a full border with the Republic of Belarus.
        1. 0
          1 November 2017 10: 47
          In this case, and in terms of discussing the topic, I had in mind the border as a line of defense, and not as a point of passport control and customs inspection.
          1. 0
            1 November 2017 14: 35
            Then the line of defense of Russia is the range of the Caliber, which is by no means based in Belarus.
            1. 0
              1 November 2017 14: 51
              Quote: Roma-1977
              Then the line of defense of Russia is the range of the Caliber, which is by no means based in Belarus.

              Do you really think that all the confrontation with NATO will come down to an exchange of attacks by tomahawk calibers? Then, in your opinion, neither aviation, nor air defense, nor tanks, nor, moreover, infantry, are needed by anyone and to hell
              1. 0
                1 November 2017 15: 25
                Are needed. But in Belarus, Russian aviation, tanks and infantry are not based. So Belarus is useless for the defense of Russia.
                1. 0
                  1 November 2017 18: 23
                  Quote: Roma-1977
                  Are needed. But in Belarus, Russian aviation, tanks and infantry are not based. So Belarus is useless for the defense of Russia.

                  In how! Yes, of you is a strategist, how of ... In case of conflict, under an agreement, all this will be immediately transferred to Belarus. And you have already merged Belarus from the allies and gave its territory to the tear of NATO.
                  1. 0
                    2 November 2017 09: 47
                    In the event of a NATO-Russia conflict, nothing Russian will be transferred to Belarus. Only NATO.
    2. +3
      31 October 2017 11: 52
      Let Putin work. But Lukashenko is worth considering: is he tired?
  3. +4
    31 October 2017 11: 36
    Nemesis Today, 11:11 am New
    In other words, now the Lukashenko’s army will be supplied at the expense of the Russian Federation and to the detriment of the Russian Federation, just as today, more than 50% at the expense of Russia, without any benefit to Russia, is allegedly supplied with a state that is not recognized by Minsk as part of the Russian Federation, and even the film Crimea forbids showing on its territory ... Putin must retire.

    Firstly, not a word of truth. Secondly, you cannot comprehend the work of the presidents. Thirdly, in malice and rashness, how do you differ from a finished Bandera ?!
    1. 0
      1 November 2017 10: 35
      And what - have the movies been allowed to show?
  4. +6
    31 October 2017 11: 45
    Quote: Nemesis
    In other words, now Lukashenka’s army will be supplied at the expense of the Russian Federation and to the detriment of the Russian Federation, just as today, more than 50% at the expense of Russia, without any benefit to Russia, the allegedly allied state with Minsk is being supplied, which does not recognize Crimea as part of the Russian Federation and even the film Crimea forbids showing on its territory ... Putin must retire ...

    Do you know where you should go? I won’t specify, otherwise I’ll be offended, I’ll just note, you’re already thinking tightly, some kind of movie has come here, don’t you understand that the flight time to Berlin and Warsaw from the territory of the Republic of Belarus is much less than from the Russian Federation, and here is the “Crimea”?
    1. 0
      1 November 2017 10: 35
      From Kaliningrad to Berlin and Warsaw closer.
  5. +3
    31 October 2017 12: 06
    However, it is scary in Belarus, surrounded by NATO. The first blow to Kaliningrad and Minsk, in which case ...
    1. +1
      31 October 2017 16: 27
      Quote: Zhelezyakin
      Scary however in Belarus
      what's scary? what
    2. 0
      1 November 2017 10: 33
      Only in Kaliningrad. Minsk, in the case of a big schucher, will immediately say: "Chik-chik, I'm in the house! I am a neutral independent country!" Do not have illusions.
  6. +1
    31 October 2017 16: 40
    We discussed how to adjust the equipment to the neighbors on neighboring conditions. Those. for free. And besides such conditions, they are discussing nothing.
  7. +1
    31 October 2017 16: 49
    Russian President ratified agreement with Minsk on joint provision of troops
    Well, it is necessary so it is necessary ... wink