Defense Ministry plans to purchase transport IL-276

47
The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation plans to purchase medium military transport aircraft IL-276, which can transport several combat vehicles or up to a hundred military personnel over a distance of 5-6 thousands of kilometers. At the same time, the car will be able to do without runways - it sits down easily and takes off from the usual ground, according to News.



The aircraft is created on the basis of the unimplemented joint Russian-Indian project MTA (Multi-role Transport Aircraft).

Currently, the military are negotiating with aircraft manufacturers. In particular, the timing and the creation of the IL-276 are discussed. It is already certain that the need of the Ministry of Defense is no less than 55 machines.

In JSC "Ilyushin" confirmed this information.

“An intergovernmental agreement on the joint development and construction of an MTA aircraft was signed by Moscow and New Delhi in 2007. After 3, the base agreement was concluded by the Russian KLA and the Indian Hindustan Aeronautics Limited. It was expected that the first flight of the aircraft will perform in the 2017 year. Subsequently, the dates were shifted several times. And at the end of 2015, the Indian side announced its withdrawal from the project, ”reminds the newspaper.

In 2016, it became known that the MTA project, called IL-276 (previously Russian media project MTA-SVTS was called IL-214), will be continued by the Ilyushin company.

IL-276 is a twin-engine jet aircraft with a take-off weight of just over 60 tons. Its payload is around 20 tons. The machine is capable of flying at over 800 km / h. 6 thousand.

In the future, it will replace all those transport vehicles that have not been produced since the times of the USSR - An-12, An-72, An-32. On this plane will put the engines from the upgraded IL-76. They are well mastered by industry. This will greatly accelerate the process of fine-tuning the aircraft and putting it into service,
told military expert Anton Lavrov.

He added that "an average transport aircraft is very necessary for transportation over such distances, where it is inappropriate to drive a large IL-76."

In IL-276 and run, and fuel consumption will be significantly less. It is useful for the transfer of light equipment and people. Transportation of supplies to remote garrisons, especially in the Arctic, is very popular. Also, based on it, the EW and electronic reconnaissance aircraft will most likely be created. And if you wish, you can make a flying laboratory and even a passenger plane for the transportation of command,
said Lavrov.
47 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    20 October 2017 10: 21
    Another nail in the lid of the coffin of the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Although the famous Antonov firm is a pity. Polit ruined.
    1. +2
      20 October 2017 10: 23
      Quote: 210ox
      Another nail in the lid of the coffin of the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Although the famous Antonov firm is a pity. Polit ruined.

      This is something like the PAK TA project, as I understand it ...
      1. +3
        20 October 2017 10: 25
        No, this is another project.
        Quote: NIKNN
        Quote: 210ox
        Another nail in the lid of the coffin of the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Although the famous Antonov firm is a pity. Polit ruined.

        This is something like the PAK TA project, as I understand it ...
        1. +3
          20 October 2017 10: 34
          Quote: 210ox
          No, this is another project.

          I apologize, I read it inattentively ... According to TTX, this An12 turns out ... hi
          1. +3
            20 October 2017 10: 40
            I don’t know for what performance characteristics this An-12 turns out. They are similar only in weight and carrying capacity. But neither speed nor range converge at all.
            1. +6
              20 October 2017 10: 43
              Quote: Muvka
              I don’t know for what performance characteristics this An-12 turns out. They are similar only in weight and carrying capacity. But neither speed nor range converge at all.

              I tried to identify a niche in which to cram. TTX aircraft as such did not compare. It’s clear that it should be better ... hi
              1. +4
                20 October 2017 11: 36
                A movie and that il214 has already taken off? Do you know its real speed and range? For your comparison: an12bk- take-off weight max. -61t, carrying capacity-20t, flight range-5530km, Vmist.mah.-660km / h, Vpr.mah.-560km / h. As you can see, the maximum take-off weight, payload mass and flight range are approximately equal, so that for all performance characteristics (except speed) they belong to the same class. But the an72 and an32 are a bit different planes, they do not fit the "medium" ones, the class of "light" manin, this is the niche of Il112.
                1. +7
                  20 October 2017 11: 51
                  Quote: Rushnairfors
                  A movie and that il214 has already taken off? Do you know its real speed and range?

                  I was always offended.
                  1. Engines such as Boeing, allow you to fly "humpback" further, higher and almost 100km / h faster and more economical
                  2. Giants from Airbus and Boeing, fly from Russia to the USA in two !!! engines along a route with a hook close to Greenland.
                  3. This is to say that so far there is nothing “breakthrough”, there are only lotions and separately MS-21, and then for today with reservations ..
                  PS.
                  4. Sorry for the tar shovel, but to "rejoice" that Antonov’s kirdyk when they themselves were caught, well, not comme il faut. Azhno 55 aircraft for the MO and 3/5 for the Ministry of Emergencies and Co., well, very much, and plus the Indians waved the handle after 6 years of enthusiasm.
                  We know how to work. wassat
                  1. +4
                    20 October 2017 12: 17
                    I agree, there is nothing to rejoice. Even Il112 is going very hard, even though it was supposed to take off in the summer.
                  2. +3
                    20 October 2017 13: 30
                    Quote: Scoun
                    waved pen after 6 years of enthusiasm.
                    We know how to work.


                    But in Russian and on a grand scale ...

                    Good advertisement alone!

                    And the output is a complete zero!
                    1. +1
                      20 October 2017 21: 00
                      And LATER IN THE LAST TIME ALL THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY, HELPFUL ADVERTISING WITH A BAND!
                  3. 0
                    22 October 2017 10: 35
                    Quote: Scoun
                    We are able to work

                    We know how to work, do not worry. Thank you to the politicians who were handed over to the same aircraft industry by the same Boeing and Airbus. It is not surprising that now everything new comes with a creak. Instead of crying, you'd better wish good luck.
                2. 0
                  22 October 2017 10: 30
                  Quote: Rushnairfors
                  and that il214 has already taken off? Do you know its real speed and range?

                  Nowadays (as 50 years ago), all these parameters are calculated at the design stage.
    2. +8
      20 October 2017 10: 26
      Quote: 210ox
      Another nail in the coffin of the Ukrainian aircraft industry.
      We will not regret about yesterday. In the end - it's their choice. What is good, - from our side we are feeling a steady forward movement. Thanks (!) To the West. Their sanctions stimulate us very much for our own development.
      1. 0
        20 October 2017 11: 57
        "Let's not look back!" (with)
    3. +7
      20 October 2017 10: 36
      Quote: 210ox
      Another nail in the lid of the coffin of the Ukrainian aircraft industry. Although the famous Antonov firm is a pity. Polit ruined.

      They ruined themselves by jumping for lace underpants. The movers are wondering whose Perm PS 90 or Rybinsk D 30. what
      1. +3
        20 October 2017 10: 49
        An-178 is already flying, and we are being offered a beautiful bench model ... How much will we expect “in metal”? Five years Ten? Fifteen? Rather, the Donbass will fade and plans for cooperation will be restored.
        1. +6
          20 October 2017 10: 52
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Rather, the Donbass will fade and plans for cooperation will be restored.

          You yourself answered your own question.
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Five years Ten? Fifteen?
        2. +6
          20 October 2017 11: 02
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          How much will we expect “in the metal”?

          what So what are you so worried about the Russian aviation industry?
          Quote: Leader of the Redskins
          Rather, the Donbass will fade and plans for cooperation will be restored.

          laughing At the door stood Stirlitz in a cap with earflaps and with PPSh on his chest ...
          bully Do not be fooled, your contract is not yet completed!
        3. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            20 October 2017 11: 28
            Actually, I compared An-178 with IL-276 ... Can you give a similar article from the designers?
      2. +4
        20 October 2017 10: 54
        Engines from the upgraded IL-76 will be installed on this aircraft. They are well mastered by industry. This will greatly accelerate the process of finalizing the aircraft and adopting it,

        Based on the article, they will most likely put PS-90A-76
        1. +6
          20 October 2017 10: 56
          Quote: Nemo
          most likely will put PS-90A-76

          Thanks Colleague. drinks hi
      3. +6
        20 October 2017 12: 12
        Quote: 79807420129
        Dviguns are interesting whose Perm PS 90 or Rybinsk D 30.

        Perm PS-90. But why put a morally obsolete engine on a modern airplane, and not the latest PD-14? By the way, formally, these notorious engines became a stumbling block in negotiations with the Indians! The Indians wanted modern ones, and since there was no PD-14, they insisted on imported ones. And ours pushed through these PS-90. This did not suit the Indians at all. It would seem that it would be necessary to draw a lesson from history! And carry out the aircraft with modern PD-14. You look, and the Indians would have ordered.
        1. 0
          20 October 2017 20: 55
          [/ quote] On October 30 of 2015, tests began [5] on the wing of the IL-76LL flying laboratory [6]. Serial production was planned from 2016 of the year, with a yearly output of at least 20-30 engines [7]. Currently, the start date of its mass production has been shifted to 2018 year [8] [quote]
          This is about PD-14. Nope it right now so far.
        2. 0
          21 October 2017 02: 12
          Quote: Stas157
          But why put a morally obsolete engine on a modern airplane, and not the latest PD-14 ?.

          Do we already have a bunch of PD-14 in our warehouses, or do we have to wait until their mass production is established? This may be a temporary solution. T-50 is also being tested with a "non-native" engine.
    4. +3
      20 October 2017 11: 07
      This nail will be twisted for at least 10 years. What will be the result - a new machine or only spent funds, only God knows. But starting a project for 50 cars is not rational.
  2. +1
    20 October 2017 10: 23
    The article contains the abbreviation MTA. On board the MTS. Where is the little one? Or is there advertising on board?
    1. +8
      20 October 2017 10: 29
      Quote: Hagalaz
      The article contains the abbreviation MTA. On board the MTS. Where is the little one? Or is there advertising on board?

      мtarget тpassport сamulet = multrapurpose ttransport aircraft
    2. +5
      20 October 2017 10: 31
      Quote: Hagalaz
      On board the MTS. Where is the little one?

      "Mnogozelewoi transportny samoljot" Seriously. 8))) In addition to "MTA", they use the abbreviation MPTA (Multi-Purpose Transport Aircraft)
      1. 0
        20 October 2017 10: 56
        Thank you all hi
  3. 0
    20 October 2017 10: 29
    Interestingly, and the impact of the 70-ton machine will withstand the soil when landing?
    1. +5
      20 October 2017 10: 34
      il76 completely sits on the ground, and it will be heavier
    2. +3
      20 October 2017 10: 34
      With the appropriate chassis, the soil will withstand everything. wink
    3. 0
      20 October 2017 10: 35
      It depends on what kind of soil, anyway, a special team will choose the landing site and also deploy navigation equipment.
    4. +2
      20 October 2017 10: 37
      It depends on the soil. There, not a simple field is implied, but a prepared ground take-off.
    5. +1
      20 October 2017 10: 38
      Holds the same IL-76 (much heavier than this). Grain - meaning specially prepared area (leveled, grass mowed, soil rolled) without coating.
    6. +1
      20 October 2017 11: 28
      Quote: sa-ag
      Interestingly, and the impact of the 70-ton machine will withstand the soil when landing?


  4. +2
    20 October 2017 10: 30
    Really all the same, our leadership decided to fully restore the aviation industry. Would not jinx it.
  5. 0
    20 October 2017 10: 36
    Quote: Hagalaz
    The article contains the abbreviation MTA. On board the MTS. Where is the little one? Or is there advertising on board?


    AIT is probably the abbreviation of the Latin abbreviation
  6. 0
    20 October 2017 10: 38
    Here is a competitor to the Brazilians and Ukrainian-Chinese appear.
    1. +3
      20 October 2017 10: 58
      Quote: marshes
      Ukrainian-Chinese will appear.

      ?????????????
      1. +3
        20 October 2017 11: 07
        Quote: Smog
        ?????????????

        I don’t know that there is already an AN-178 with 18 tons, it’s close to Ilyushin 276, so China, with the help of engineers from Antonov’s design bureau, creates such a thing.
        The purchase of two An-178s from Ukraine and subsequent joint production with China is envisaged]
        1. +4
          20 October 2017 12: 41
          Quote: marshes
          What is not in the know

          I missed this news. Grand gran mercy soldier
  7. 0
    20 October 2017 11: 35
    And what about the An-70? We have 50% of intellectual property on it. It was possible to change something in it and let there be an IL-70. The plane is not bad. That would be good for us. Nezalezhniki not pull it.
    1. +1
      20 October 2017 11: 56
      Yes, and we will not pull. There is no electronic design documentation for it to be put into production, the aircraft was designed for defective Ukrainian engines, the tests have not been completed yet. Certification, respectively, did not. And this kit can be supplemented by the fact that the car was not in the weight niche that was ordered, but in the niche IL-76. And to hell with us 2 aircraft, the same characteristics?
  8. 0
    20 October 2017 11: 51
    At the same time, the machine can do without runways - it easily lands and takes off from ordinary soil

    Something I have big doubts about this because of the low-lying engines, which you won’t fly into ...
  9. 0
    20 October 2017 12: 11
    Just wondering how many Antonovites returned to their native pinats, that is, to Russia? Or did everyone flow to China?
    The school was the strongest in terms of transport; it’s a pity to lose such people.
  10. 0
    20 October 2017 12: 56
    Does he fly already? And so far, in addition to this very model of the aircraft, in reality, there isn’t, but they will definitely buy it ....
  11. 0
    20 October 2017 13: 12
    But what, he is not a "smile" now?
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. The comment was deleted.