Military Review

The first Tu-214PU-SBUS for the Ministry of Defense

26
The first flight built at the S.P. Aviation Plant took place in Kazan. Gorbunova (a branch of PJSC “Tupolev”) for the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of a special purpose aircraft - the control point Tu-214PU-SBUS, reports bmpd.




The plane is not painted yet, and it is unclear whether it is fully equipped with special equipment.

The resource recalls that in November 2015 of the year, PJSC “Tupolev” announced the conclusion of a contract for the construction of two Tu-214PU-SBUS aircraft with the United Aircraft Building Corporation. The final customer was the Russian military department.



The cost of the transaction amounted to 5,6 billion rubles, the deadline for the fulfillment of obligations under the contract was set to December 31 2017.

The construction of the 2-x Tu-214PU-SBUS aircraft with the 529 and 530 serial numbers was also confirmed in the procurement materials of PJSC Tupolev. According to these materials, Tu-214PU-SBUS aircraft should be equipped with a special onboard communication node SBUS-214.

Photos used:
Dmitry Romashko / russianplanes.net
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. HEATHER
    HEATHER 18 October 2017 13: 08
    +9
    ................................
    1. bagr69
      bagr69 18 October 2017 13: 13
      +3
      Where are the indignant “fighters with the regime” and shouts that they haven’t built anything in Russia in 20 years?
      We build, and not just planes.
      1. bober1982
        bober1982 18 October 2017 13: 16
        +7
        Quote: bagr69
        Where there are indignant "fighters with the regime"

        In a Paris nuthouse.
      2. donavi49
        donavi49 18 October 2017 13: 31
        +8
        In fairness, this is an order so that the Kazan plant does not lose the cycle. Both planes - an emergency backlog.

        Actually - federal departments are actively buying out such abandoned backlogs for piece-wise completion from problem enterprises. That is, which Irkut or Komsomolsk will live without 2 airplanes, but such problematic enterprises as Kazan, where they actually release 1 aircraft in 1,5 of the year, no. They will be forced to cut workshops and drive / retrain people. In other words, they will lose the opportunity to build aircraft. Only repair.
        1. Titsen
          Titsen 18 October 2017 13: 38
          +1
          Quote: donavi49
          In fairness, this is an order so that the Kazan plant does not lose the cycle. Both planes - an emergency backlog.


          A good failing backlog - 5,6lard!

          Well this is how much for one plane out of two?

          So I live like this!
          1. Servisinzhener
            Servisinzhener 19 October 2017 15: 22
            +1
            In 2007, the cost was 35 million dollars apiece + the cost of special equipment. (Airbas A318 costs 72 million apiece) So the amount is not sky-high.
      3. faiver
        faiver 18 October 2017 16: 37
        +3
        Is two aircraft an achievement? and two more tugboats were handed over to the fleet this week - be proud ...
    2. Bronevick
      Bronevick 18 October 2017 16: 57
      +1
      In foreign cars, pilots feel more impressive, but here it’s as if they are going to Craz.
  2. Aleksandr21
    Aleksandr21 18 October 2017 13: 13
    +2
    "The transaction value amounted to 5,6 billion rubles, the deadline for the fulfillment of obligations under the contract was set until December 31, 2017."

    It turns out that until December 31, 2017, the UAC had to build and transfer 2 aircraft to the customer (Ministry of Defense)? Wow they have a schedule lag ....
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 18 October 2017 13: 32
      +2
      There the aircraft were partially assembled. They are refused. Therefore, the contract period is so tight. And of course - they don’t fit into it. But the delay in 1 year is not bad. Von Beriev already in the 3 of the year has expired and norms for him.
      1. Aleksandr_2
        Aleksandr_2 18 October 2017 13: 47
        +2
        Von Beriev has already expired for 3 years, and he has norms.

        Beriev’s MO order was recalled and money was collected for the contract + fine
    2. svd-xnumx
      svd-xnumx 18 October 2017 21: 52
      0
      It turns out that until December 31, 2017, the UAC had to build and transfer 2 aircraft to the customer (Ministry of Defense)? Wow they have a schedule lag ...
      So today is 18.10.17/31.12.17/XNUMX. and, as it were, until XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX even more than two months.
      1. Aleksandr21
        Aleksandr21 19 October 2017 08: 10
        0
        Quote: svd-xnumx
        So today is 18.10.17/31.12.17/XNUMX. and, as it were, until XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX even more than two months.


        They don’t have time, they contractually transfer two planes until 31.12.17/214/2018, and in fact only the first plane flew now, not yet painted. At least one could be delivered, but it is doubtful that even the first aircraft will have time this year, until the flight tests the aircraft passes, while the equipment is checked, the time will decently leave. Most likely the first Tu-2019PU-SBUS will be handed over in XNUMX, and the second in XNUMX (IMHO, of course). Although I will be glad to make a mistake, in the direction of reducing the time :)
  3. assa67
    assa67 18 October 2017 13: 17
    +3
    no avionics .... Serdyukovsky inheritance?
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 18 October 2017 13: 29
      +5
      avionics no Purely ours. Modernization begins on the Superjet. Refusal from Amer’s programming. It will be somewhere around 40 to 60. Not in our favor. MS-21 is 80 to 20 in our favor. Today our people leave Boeing for Irkutsk. If something is Boeing 767 and 777 gliders were created by our engineers. Like Airbus 230 and 240. You will find out a lot if you flog about the A-380. This is generally shocking news. Without the Russians, this mutant would not take off, at all.
    2. FID
      FID 18 October 2017 13: 30
      12
      Are you an avionics expert? Share, if not a secret, what is the difference between the helm control of the Tu-214 PU aircraft and the helm control of the Il-96-300 PU (note that I am not asking about radio systems, but asking about incorrect data). And where does Serdyukov ???
      1. assa67
        assa67 18 October 2017 16: 14
        +3
        when Serdyukov, KUS blocks (NATO) were purchased from Italians
  4. FID
    FID 18 October 2017 13: 31
    +6
    By the way, these are photos of the extreme flight of this side in Kazan.
    1. HEATHER
      HEATHER 18 October 2017 13: 37
      +7
      [/ b] Sergey Ivanovich! My submission! On the video This is a flight in Novosib. Well, I don’t have to explain it to you. Do not disappear from the site. You, there are three people left here. With respect. hi And in secret [b], what is the difference between the helm control of the Tu-214 PU and the helm control of the Il-96-300 PU I rummage in helicopters. MS-21 for me is terra incognita. Well, Tu-22M3, Tu-95MS, Tu-160. This is what I went through. And I would serve now, if I hadn’t done anything in the 90s.
      1. FID
        FID 18 October 2017 14: 12
        +8
        Colleague! True, I am not a military man (even from the cradle in the army), but I served these types throughout the USSR. And the difference between ASHU-204 and ASUU-96 is in the ideology of using the analog control loop. On carcasses, it is purely reserve, and for scum, it is used for its intended purpose - it steers surfaces.
  5. zivXP
    zivXP 18 October 2017 13: 38
    +3
    The first flight is always exciting, what is for man, what is for technology.
  6. Guillon
    Guillon 18 October 2017 14: 20
    0
    Bravo Kazan! Only long ruffles! Who shoves sticks in the wheels?!? request
    1. faiver
      faiver 18 October 2017 16: 40
      0
      who to list you? can I electronically not transfer paper? :)
  7. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 18 October 2017 18: 41
    0
    In general, a beautiful aircraft, like all Tupolev Design Bureau aircraft ...
  8. dmmyak40
    dmmyak40 18 October 2017 23: 42
    +1
    Quote: VERESK
    ................................

    Yes, no matter what they say about the competitiveness of TU, ​​the presence of a third crew member today is a poor indicator at the current level of automation. It’s good that there’s no navigator and flight attendant. At one time, the flight engineer had to enter the crew of the Yak-40 in order to unload the commander and co-pilot.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 23 October 2017 12: 14
      +4
      Quote: dmmyak40
      Yes, no matter what they say about the competitiveness of TU, ​​the presence of a third crew member today is a poor indicator at the current level of automation.

      So long ago there is a modification of the Tu-204CM without a third member! It all depends on the choice of the customer. MO is apparently easier to pay for an engineer’s board than for a more modern avionics. The difference between the modifications is 10 million dollars.