USA: Turkey buying C-400 is a problem for NATO

October 13 2017 33

Ankara’s decision to purchase C-400 anti-aircraft systems from Russia is a problem RIA News Statement by US Permanent Representative to NATO Kay Hutchison.

This caused concern in NATO, since these systems are incompatible with the systems used by the alliance,

said Hutchison in an interview with the Washington Post.

At the same time, she stressed several times that “Turkey is a key partner of the United States,” and Washington is interested in working with her.

The United States "does not want Turkey to move closer to Russia," the permanent representative noted.

It is not in our interest. But it is also not in the interests of Turkey,

she added.

Recall, Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan 12 of September reported that Ankara has signed an agreement with Moscow on the acquisition of C-400 systems, the deposit has already been made. This information was confirmed by Vladimir Kozhin, presidential aide on military-technical cooperation. According to him, the contract has been signed and is being prepared for execution. Later, the Deputy Head of the Secretariat of the Defense Industry of Turkey, Ismail Demir, said that the supply of C-400 systems to Turkey will begin within two years.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

svp67

+19

13 October 2017 08: 14

Oh, the S-300 Greeks were able to include in the general air defense system and these can. It is immediately different that Turkey, with their S-400, at any moment can become that "hole" through which our missiles can fly. But it seems to me that Turkey S-400 WILL NOT BUY from us. For her, all this is an occasion to knock out as many concessions from the USA as possible, and most importantly to reduce the price of buying such American systems.
1. SERGE ANT
  
  +13
  
  13 October 2017 08: 21
  Well, well today, damn it, words will not let me insert, like a cow in the tongue all my thoughts ... Unless, to add, our fellow mothers are also ready to sell our mother, and it doesn’t matter to whom, why. The rights were oldThat was right, what to say .......
  1. Alex20042004
    
    0
    
    14 October 2017 18: 34
    
    Just like a point!
2. Observer2014
  
  +7
  
  13 October 2017 08: 24
  
  svp67
  But it seems to me that Turkey S-400 WILL NOT BUY from us. For her, all this is an occasion to dislodge as many concessions from the USA as possible,
  100% I support. Moreover, we, as it were, also do not show much zeal for the sale to the Turks With 400. They will buy. Well they will buy. They will not buy, well, chickenpox will be in their hotel pool.
3. Anarchist
  
  +17
  
  13 October 2017 08: 25
  
  it’s also not in the interests of Turkey,
  she added.
  
  Turks go into politics. Only they know what is in their interest!
  Russia should not miss the chance to turn Turkey away from NATO ...
  After Russia, Turkey has the most powerful army in Europe!
  1. svp67
    
    +5
    
    13 October 2017 08: 31
    
    Quote: Anarchist
    After Russia, Turkey has the most powerful army in Europe!
    
    STOP. You probably don’t know, but Ukraine has the most "strong army of Europe" ...
    And what about Turkey, so their "Syrian campaign" showed that it is not enough to have a large number and, in principle, not poor equipment, we must also be able to use all this effectively
    1. bouncyhunter
      
      +3
      
      13 October 2017 09: 11
      
      Ankara’s decision to purchase S-400 anti-aircraft systems from Russia is a problem
      
      Any decision of any country that does not correspond to the line of the Central Committee of Matrasia is a problem.
      Quote: svp67
      But it seems to me that Turkey S-400 WILL NOT BUY from us. For her, all this is an occasion to knock out as many concessions from the USA as possible, and most importantly to reduce the price of buying such American systems.
      
      This scenario was supposed from the beginning, but who knows which cockroaches run in the heads of those in power? We will see ...
    2. Dimy4
      
      0
      
      13 October 2017 10: 36
      
      STOP. You probably don’t know, but Ukraine has the most "strong army of Europe" ...
      
      Yes, what is there in Europe - in the world, in the galaxy, in the whole universe ... In what! On one exhalation it is necessary to pronounce, bulging eyes.
  2. Monarchist
    
    0
    
    13 October 2017 09: 56
    
    404 declares that it has the most powerful army in Europe, Plotnitsky declares that they are the second army in strength in Europe, and then we are 3-4 positions with the Sultan?
4. ilimnoz
  
  0
  
  13 October 2017 08: 39
  
  that’s exactly what makes the United States more accommodating. when the Saudis announced the S-400, the states immediately approved all the contracts, but first their legislators set up a bagpipe about the undesirability of transferring some systems to the Saudis
5. pvv113
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2017 10: 05
  
  Quote: svp67
  But it seems to me that Turkey S-400 WILL NOT BUY from us
  
  It seems there was information that an advance payment has already been made
6. Alex20042004
  
  0
  
  14 October 2017 18: 35
  
  Everything is very simple. All vaunted Americanos "stealth" will be in full view.
The comment was deleted.
XII legion

+18

13 October 2017 08: 19

Turkey itself is a problem for NATO
Pashuk1601

+3

13 October 2017 08: 20

The Turks will somehow decide for themselves what is in their interests! "Incompatible" - and non-financial, such a monopoly on the supply of arms to the allies of the "exceptional", and you will not dig!
Masya masya

+9

13 October 2017 08: 21

It is not in our interest. But it is also not in the interests of Turkey,

the interests of Turkey, apparently now it is the states that determine it, and not Turkey itself ... the "exceptional" ones ...
askort154

+2

13 October 2017 08: 23

I remember 3-4 years ago, Turkey was going to buy the S-300 from us, but it caved in under US pressure and bought the Chinese, citing a lower price. Let's see what happens now.
1. Anatole Klim
  
  0
  
  13 October 2017 10: 32
  
  Quote: askort154
  Turkey was going to buy S-300 from us, but it caved in under US pressure and bought the Chinese, citing a lower price. Let's see what happens now.
  
  No, you're wrong. Turkey never bought the HQ-9 (a copy of the Russian S-300 air defense system), the Americans bent the Turks and they did not sign the contract, although the Chinese promised to transfer technology and build a plant for the production of air defense systems. Now a similar situation may arise, although the Turks have given the advance payment, I don’t know how it is under the terms of the contract, but usually the advance is not returned.
kartalovkolya

+10

13 October 2017 08: 25

It’s not a question of whether the S-400 is compatible or not compatible with the NATO missile defense, but if the Turks put the S-400 on combat duty, then Turkish airspace will simply be closed for US and NATO aviation at any time. afraid of this, as another step towards independence of Turkey, and everything else BLA-BLA-BLA from the repertoire of "shadow on the fence"!
1. SmokeR 47RU
  
  +1
  
  13 October 2017 09: 07
  
  I totally agree.
ando_bor

0

13 October 2017 08: 33

But they are perfectly combined in the sky.
Alexey-74

0

13 October 2017 08: 39

The sale of S-400 systems by Russia is more a political step than a serious military aspect .... here comes someone: Turks - they want to prove something to the states, and this is obvious ... well, Russia right here shows that it is ready to get closer to Turkey in some moment...
bald

0

13 October 2017 08: 42

--- "This caused alarm in NATO, because these systems are incompatible with the systems that the alliance uses" --- What kind of compatibility are we talking about and what is the compatibility with the systems that the alliance uses. Things should be called directly by their proper names. Buying the perfect (no chapel for perfection) weapons in its class from Russia, an adversary of NATO. Yes, the mattresses, Ankara lost her arms and spat on your obsessive recommendations.
iliitchitch

+1

13 October 2017 08: 51

Turkoführer on two chairs. Yes and figs with him. Buy-not buy, you know. What for us? For tomatoes and not only grab is never too late.
MaxMelan

+1

13 October 2017 08: 55

Yeah! Build a c400 having received money for them and then the political situation will change and we will leave it to ourselves. Well, the deposit can be returned. But it will be later and not now. As with the Iranian c300 it turned out.
FLOOD

0

13 October 2017 09: 13

Well, if you can sell to India, China and Saudi Arabia, then why not sell to Turkey ?! I don’t think that the Turks, having acquired the "Grumble", will become dirty in any way. On the contrary, this can thoroughly strengthen the position of the Russian Federation in the Middle East. In the future, there are plans that will greatly affect the whole situation, not only in BV, but also in Europe and the USA. Many here are "dirty" expressed about Turkey, I want to pump up the brain muscles and not strain the ligaments below the waist.
1. Grandfather
  
  +2
  
  13 October 2017 09: 23
  
  Quote: TUFAN
  Many here are dirty words about Turkey,
  
  we are not Azerbaijan, we have nothing to love the Turks for, except for filth and tomatoes, nothing ...
  1. FLOOD
    
    0
    
    13 October 2017 09: 50
    
    And you cannot become Azerbaijan. Nobody imposes love on Turks for you. You learn to love Russia before!
NEXUS

+2

13 October 2017 09: 40

It is not in our interest. But it is also not in the interests of Turkey,

That is the whole policy of the States ...
"you don’t need it, because it’s not profitable for us"

Whether Erdogash bought Triumphs or not, one thing is certain, the Middle East is changing and the United States is not to his liking.
1. Esoteric
  
  0
  
  13 October 2017 20: 35
  
  Quote: NEXUS
  Whether Erdogash bought Triumphs or not, one thing is certain, the Middle East is changing and the United States is not to his liking.
  
  The main thing is that the SGA does not like Russia. So that she calls the things that the SGA does in her own names. Tuption or SGA - on the drum. You must behave with dignity, without revealing vice and humiliation ...
rotmistr60

+1

13 October 2017 09: 43

since these systems are incompatible with those systems that the alliance uses,

That is, in case of emergency it will not be possible to disconnect? And they are worried that the money will go to Russia, and not to the American military-industrial complex.
Will

0

13 October 2017 10: 47

The deposit has been made, the USA is worried - already a plus to our policy.
Nemesis

+1

13 October 2017 10: 54

S-400 in NATO Turkey is a problem for Russia
assa67

+3

13 October 2017 11: 03

"the beginning of deliveries within two years" ... voo, that's right ... first we will implement the Turkish stream, then we will see whether to give the complexes or not .... otherwise the Ottoman-Pasha has been twisted, not like in 2, wants to sit on ten chairs
Sergey956

+1

13 October 2017 11: 24

Of course, Turkish S-400s will be a big problem for the USA and NATO! Loss of control in the airspace of Turkey and the opportunity to bomb Turkey with impunity if necessary. Turks will be able to shoot down NATO planes and missiles with the S-400 in case of problems.
razved

0

13 October 2017 19: 53

This is not in our interests. But it’s also not in Turkey’s interests, she added.

How does the US state know what is in the interest of Turkey and what is not. The question, of course, is rhetorical, but still ...