The film "Crimea", or Back to the Future of Ukraine

84


No, I did not wait for this particular film to be released. But I waited for a very long time when such a film as “Crimea” would be released in Russia. And waited.



Only a few days have passed since the film “Crimea” came out in Russia, and viewers who were not indifferent to this event have already managed to split into two camps that do not understand each other. Some did not accept Alexei Pimanov’s new film, calling it a lie and a waste of 400 million rubles from the Russian budget, while the latter viewed it in one breath.

The author belongs to the second category of viewers.

Just want to say to opponents, “Crimea” is not a documentary film. This is a movie with meaning. And this sense lies in the future. And therefore I understand you, but I do not accept your opinion. It's time to stop looking into the past, it's time to turn into the future. You understand: the film is not about how everything was in reality. This task was not set before the director. This is a movie about what is happening in Ukraine today and about how we all can find a way out of the situation we all ended up in thanks to the Maidan initiated by Washington.

The film "Crimea", or Back to the Future of Ukraine


Yes, precisely we and precisely all. As present-day Kiev, declaring at every corner that it does not need Russia, can never do without it, so Russia, to many citizens of which the current efforts of its leadership in Ukraine seem incomprehensible, will never forget about it. We are all doomed to live side by side and together, which means we need to look for ways to get to this.

This is exactly what the main characters of the movie are doing for an hour and a half.

And in order to start looking for this path, we must first understand that we are all the same: maydanutye, antimaydanutye and all those who did not fit into this family showdown. Yes, we have different “garbage” in our brains, but we are still the same. It is this thought that is one of the key points in the plot of the film, and it is precisely she who does not like those who did not accept the film.

Moreover, those who left Ukraine and a large part of the Russian “patriotic” community, who were accustomed to seeing non-populations or nonhumans as their opponents, didn’t accept him. Unfortunately, not only they are to blame for this, but also many journalists and “activists” who formed this image over the past three years. And they are not ready to accept this, and chose to accuse Pimanov of “Proander’s”.

That this is wrong and that it all pours water on the mill of our enemies, the author tries to explain all more than three years of this madness. And that is why he is very happy with the release of such a film as “Crimea”. This is a balm for the soul. This is a strong ally in the information war that our enemies are waging against us.

Actually, this is the main value of the "Crimea". Tens of millions of viewers will see him, and it is precisely the ideas embodied in him that will prevail in society. And this is very important today. We all (again “we all”) will soon have to return (in a political sense, and to whom, and physically) to Ukraine. What will we bring to its inhabitants? Hatred and secret malice? Then you should not go back. Or maybe we will bring them the thoughts that Alexey Pimanov put into his creation? Then it makes sense.



Yes, the film "Crimea" about all of us. It is about people who are artificially trying to share, but who still draws to each other. And so there are no ghouls, Bandera, or elves who are fighting with them. The main characters of the film, Alena and Alexander, are like Russia and Ukraine. True, you can see in them the attitude of two different Ukraine, which are now clashed in the Donbas. The essence of the film does not change. Their relationship is complex and simple at the same time. Very strong, I saw the ending of the film, where Alexander is in a war, which is actually against Alena and her entourage, and his beloved is still very worried about him and asks him to take care of himself, because he is dear to her.

Actually, it is from here and the main "slogan" of the film: "With your loved ones - do not part." And it has a deep and multi-level meaning.

The fate of the main characters remains unknown, as we still do not know the fate of our homeland. When captions start to go unwittingly catch yourself thinking that the main characters (Ukraine and Russia, or two Ukraine) are doomed to live together, no matter what. And this is the second most important message of the film.

By the way, filmed for Russian budget money and clearly commissioned from the very top !!!

It makes no sense to watch it for those who want to see how everything was in the Crimea in 2014 year. But the one who thinks about the future of Ukraine, that film can and should be watched.

PS I will be very happy if someone from the readers reports, and what else did he see in this film. Maybe I looked at something.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +31
    5 October 2017 06: 51
    And in order to start looking for this path, we must first understand that we are all the same: maidanut, anti-maidanut and all those who did not fit into this family showdown. Yes, we have different “garbage” in our brains, but we are all the same the same

    And it’s a lie that we are all the same. negative People are generally different. Especially different in national mentality. But, many do not know and do not understand fool , like the author of the article.
    1. +16
      5 October 2017 07: 11
      For that matter, many cells of a person are different. And how do they get along with each other)))
    2. +22
      5 October 2017 07: 35
      Quote: populist
      And it’s a lie that we are all the same.

      The question in depth is the difference. How do Ukrainians differ from Russians? So what? What dumplings call dumplings? The fact that their character is not Siberian? Well, like yes, different. And kick this Ukrainian in a big way so that it hurts - what will he shout? Something in very Russian, he will shout. You can’t hide the essence.
      So the question is, of the differences between people, do you personally consider it significant and sufficient to consider them "not your own." You can move the border in the other direction. We have O-cabins in the Urals, and A-cabins in Saratov. We are different. Those. like we are "not ours" to each other? That’s all garbage.
      1. +9
        5 October 2017 08: 13
        When in Ivanovo I studied in the 1st year everyone laughed at my KOSTROM reprimand, and I over their reprimand, to the 2nd year I started talking in Ivanovo.
        1. +4
          5 October 2017 09: 20
          Quote: Dimy4
          When I studied at the 1 course in Ivanovo, everyone was laughing at my KOSTROM reprimand

          You and I have the same northern dialect, in Perm they also say, we just chatter quickly, it was transmitted from the Komi-Permyaks. The rest is very similar. But here the word “Perm”, apart from us, no one knows how to pronounce correctly the first time. laughing
          1. +3
            5 October 2017 09: 28
            Quote: Alex_59
            [the word “Perm”, apart from us, no one knows how to pronounce correctly the first time.

            "Perm - salty ears", where is it from?
            Just wondering...
            1. +20
              5 October 2017 09: 37
              Quote: CONTROL
              "Perm - salty ears", where is it from?

              Permyak in this case means not a resident of the city of Perm, but a resident of the Perm Territory. And one of the main products that the region has produced since ancient times was salt. In fact, the extraction of salt is one of the reasons why the region began to be developed, settled (there was still copper, transit of goods through the Vishera-Colva water system to Siberia, etc.). Salt was mined in Solikamsk, 150 km north of Perm, then Perm itself was even smaller than Solikamsk, and Cherdyn was the center of the region in general (I will tell you the most beautiful town is very atmospheric). Well, the extraction of salt in those years was so automated and innovative that a lot of people worked on loading bags of salt on river vessels for its subsequent shipment to customers. Thousands of movers. And when they dragged the bags on themselves, it turned out that their ear was rubbed on the bag and became white and salty. Here, according to legend, the phrase "perm-salty ears" comes from here.
              1. +1
                5 October 2017 11: 04
                Quote: Alex_59
                they dragged the bags on themselves, it turned out that their ear was rubbed on the bag and became white and salty. Here, according to legend, the phrase "perm-salty ears" comes from here.

                I just saw these "ears" in front of the hotel - in bronze, you can take a picture ... Everyone is holding on to them, polished ...
                ... well, and I "starred" ... "in a white jacket under the belt" ...
                1. +3
                  5 October 2017 12: 32
                  Quote: CONTROL
                  I just saw these "ears" in front of the hotel - in bronze, you can take a picture ...

                  Some wits call this art object a little differently ... well ... as if not to offend anyone ... in general, the female genital organ with ears. And it looks like it. laughing But this is of course banter not over its history, but over a modern art object. When put there, I also took a picture.
              2. +9
                5 October 2017 11: 35
                The ear was not rubbed on the bag,)))) the bags were worn on special shoulder devices,, the bags were above the head and salt from the bags fell on the head, including the ears
                1. +3
                  5 October 2017 11: 54
                  Quote: mart-kot
                  the bags were above the head and salt from the bags fell on the head, including the ears

                  Well, maybe the details are of course different.
          2. +1
            5 October 2017 10: 08
            By the way, in 1917, the topic of “Perm” was also played. but did not grow together. And it could.
        2. +15
          5 October 2017 09: 25
          Quote: populist
          And it’s a lie that we are all the same. People are generally different. Especially different in national mentality. But, many do not know and do not understand, like the author of the article.

          In Russia itself, very different peoples live, very different from each other, but we are Russia and therefore like clenched fingers in a fist. This was also the case in the USSR, where all national suburbs fought shoulder to shoulder, perished for their homeland, and created a large country.
          Therefore, I consider it a mistake to consider that Ukrainians, Balts or Georgians suddenly became so hated, because they are “different.” This does not play a role at all, you can always control any territory if you control its national elite, that is, “power.” And people do not care about the differences if there are clear, tough, but fair rules of behavior in society.
          Therefore, when the Union collapsed, our central authority for the former Soviet republics (Moscow, the Kremlin) was not able in all these former territories to interest their local elites, to offer them joint development projects attractive and beneficial in every sense. Not so bad, in some of the former It is beneficial for the republics of local authorities to make friends and cooperate with us. But you can’t say the same about Ukraine, their local authorities were stupidly outbid by Western forces.
          there was a Gazprom man who was an ambassador, then a generally quiet and inconspicuous official (who was unpopular in Russia and seemed to be serving a “link” there). Remember, every year there are gas scandals: nothing, they said, they won’t go anywhere with our great and almighty PIPE, the cartoons were such that they say we control small Ukraine and all of Western Europe in addition.
          Surprisingly, our first persons started talking about a certain “Russian world” only when it was already done.
          Therefore, you should not blame everything on the people, they say, they are secret enemy with a stone on their neck. Their local authorities and Western special centers have so pumped up propaganda, and the war in Novorossia has aggravated. Normal people there, as everywhere and even closer to us than many others, just with they needed to work at all levels. And you need powerful potential so that the nails are drawn to the magnet on the outskirts. Therefore, it is easiest to call them vile enemies, and we are all white, we are heroes. We are heroes, but we are too careless about the outskirts. when the thunder struck, we discerned in them a dog hacking x, because as soon as there is not rinse them, placing full equate them hostile to the government and the common people, who could be a bright star in our crown and thumb in the steel fist.
      2. +4
        5 October 2017 10: 29
        The question in depth is the difference. How do Ukrainians differ from Russians? What dumplings are called dumplings? .... You can’t hide the essence.


        The essence is reflected in psychotype and in folklore.
        In particular: dumplings - empty dough, dumplings must be filled. And the preparation of the filling, as well as the modeling, is time, skill and ... money. Unlike pieces of dough, called dumplings. (Which, of course, are different, but the ESSENCE does not change - it's just lumps of dough).
        Jokes about Ukrainians - not necessarily about betrayal - for example: A husband and wife go past a field where a herd of pigs grazes. The wife says to her husband: What are your relatives? “Yeah,” the husband answers, “the mother-in-law with the father-in-law.”
        1. +2
          5 October 2017 10: 39
          Hello, Norma. It will not be difficult for you to explain what conclusions should be drawn from your explanation of the difference between dumplings and dumplings?
          And also from a joke.
          1. +3
            5 October 2017 11: 05
            Hello, The vile skeptic.
            Conclusions - we are fundamentally different.
            At least in such a trifle as an attempt to compare incomparable dumplings with dumplings.

            (In general, I had to break one comment into 2 - and that’s a lack of agreement).
            According to the joke - the Hohlushka wife is important here.
            The husband (if in life) is just a hero, who found the answer. This is very rare: "borsch" is more important.
            1. +2
              5 October 2017 12: 41
              Quote: Norma
              Conclusions - we are fundamentally different.

              I still do not understand what we are fundamentally different. For example, the Bulgarians, who are not fundamentally different to us, or I don’t understand Serbs without an interpreter, and I understand the Ukrainians from Lviv after a half-hour conversation. And they are me. Although they are messing around on their own, and I am in Russian. People are like people.
              1. 0
                10 October 2017 12: 54
                Half an hour later, the Hindus began to understand, one hundred and fifty with a trailer and all. Try with others who have studied the same with us.
            2. +3
              5 October 2017 13: 31
              In your opinion, we can conclude that we are fundamentally different, basing it on dumplings and dumplings ???
              Here you write that "... as an attempt to compare INCORPORABLE dumplings with dumplings"
              So it’s you yourself who, as an example, settled on INCOMPARABLE things. Why didn’t they take comparable ones? I know why. In order to be able to fit "facts" under "theory", to show them worse than they are, worse than others in general, and we in particular. Here we are hardworking, we bother with dumplings, and they are so lazy and primitive just throw pieces of dough into the broth. In common people - pull an owl on a globe.
              But please answer, why not use dumplings instead of dumplings? Doesn’t it turn out so beautiful right away?
              And your story is the same with your joke.
              Something like that.
      3. +4
        5 October 2017 10: 33
        In this film, she is Ukrainian, he is Russian. And that is false. But on the contrary (she is Russian, he is Ukrainian) - it’s impossible at all. There are too many abandoned families when Ukrainians fled to their outskirts from Russia - after all, being married to “Russia” became not prestigious.
        Do not ascribe to Ukrainians what they basically cannot have. 300 years of deception - and for 25 years, the essence has just climbed.
        1. +8
          5 October 2017 11: 16
          Quote: Norma
          In this film, she is Ukrainian, he is Russian. And that is false. But on the contrary (she is Russian, he is Ukrainian) - it’s impossible at all. There are too many abandoned families when Ukrainians fled to their outskirts from Russia - after all, being married to “Russia” became not prestigious.

          ... I know a bunch of such families!
          Quote: Norma
          Do not ascribe to Ukrainians what they basically cannot have. 300 years of deception - and for 25 years, the essence has just climbed.

          Who - whom cheated? and for what reason? and what? ...
          I have an identity - vital - worldly! - the experience of the 64-year-old old fart! And the saying "x ... l" will be sold by mother and father without hesitation "-" Ukraine "has justified my life many times! Moreover - without my slightest desire to observe this" bitter cataclysm "...
          1. +7
            5 October 2017 12: 12
            Quote: CONTROL
            Who - whom was he deceiving? and for what reason? and what? ...

            A few years ago I met a comment on the theme "one and the same people." The comment is thorough, with arguments. Now I will not restore, however.
            But the bottom line:
            For 300 years, Ukrainians have been pushing Russians about brotherhood and united people, and when the Russians finally believed in it, Ukrainians no longer needed it.

            This is a hoax.
            1. +1
              6 October 2017 07: 39
              Quote: Norma
              For 300 years, Ukrainians have been pushing Russians about brotherhood and united people, and when the Russians finally believed in it, Ukrainians no longer needed it.

              This is a hoax.

              ... well ... I agree !!!
      4. +1
        5 October 2017 11: 38
        In Saratov, not A-cabins, but stretch the end of words ...
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 12: 00
          Quote: Sasha_Sar
          In Saratov, not A-cabins, but stretch the end of words ...

          Compared to our O-cany, you can already say A-cabins. laughing C'mon, that's all the little things.
          1. +2
            5 October 2017 16: 07
            My relatives, when they moved to Saratov, at first thought that while talking with the local population, they were kidding and there was a desire to turn into a “turnip”. But they were told in time that such a talk laughing hi
            1. +4
              6 October 2017 07: 33
              Quote: Sasha_Sar
              My relatives, when they moved to Saratov, at first thought that while talking with the local population, they were kidding and there was a desire to turn into a “turnip”. But they were told in time that such a talk laughing hi

              And I in Chelyabinsk and gave ... at once to two!
              ... it turned out - "such a talk" ...
              -------------------
              The incident was "polished" with cognac ... both "participating" parties were affixed!
      5. 0
        5 October 2017 22: 46
        Alex_59
        So the question is, of the differences between people, do you personally consider it essential and sufficient to consider them "not your own."

        Actually, it’s not me, but science that determines the existence of a national identity as “substantial and sufficient” in order to consider peoples different from each other. Accordingly, the situation is with individual representatives of different nations. hi
        Bullshit is everything

        In the 70s, three quarters of the world's ethnologists worked in the United States. The results were not long in coming. And you say - garbage. No.
    3. +4
      5 October 2017 09: 51
      antivirus 2 June 19, 2017 10:20 | Crimean border: 168 kilometers of torment arc
      As for the Crimeans, for them a visit to Ukraine is a difficult and sometimes very dangerous quest. Those who at one time renounced Ukrainian citizenship officially and handed in a “passport with a trident” have no options in principle.
      ON APRIL 16 D arrived 2 PEOPLE from Dzhankoy. BUY A MACHINE (ENGINE OVERHEATED)
      -what did before the referendum. how did you live?
      - nothing. any hunting cartridges bought

      THIS IS MY LIFE EXPERIENCE.
      WHO ACKNOWLEDGES THE IMMISSIBILITY (LET SMALL) PUNISHMENTS FOR CRIME (LOADING, THE THREAT OF DEATH) THAT WILL SAY HOW FORGIVENESS FOR SUCH "- yes nothing. Any hunting cartridges bought"


      What will we bring to its inhabitants? Hatred and hidden anger? Then you should not come back. Or maybe we will bring them the thoughts that Alexey Pimanov put into his creation? Then that makes sense.

      --- The bridge to the Crimea costs money and the cohols ("friends" will be soon) should give us money for these urgent expenses without a fee.
      it’s possible to build bridges at their expense in Yakutsk and Sakhalin. then friendship will work out
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +3
      5 October 2017 15: 56
      In some parents, children grow up different. But, for mother they are equally loved. Probably remember - "Mom, who do you love me more (son) or daughter (sister)?. Mom always answered both I love, my children! So Russia is one mother for all of us - Ukrainians and Belarusians, Tatars and Chuvash, Russians .. Mother Motherland is alone. There are many people who don’t remember kinship. Motherland - Mother forgot!
    6. +1
      5 October 2017 17: 27
      Quote: populist
      And in order to start looking for this path, we must first understand that we are all the same: maidanut, anti-maidanut and all those who did not fit into this family showdown. Yes, we have different “garbage” in our brains, but we are all the same the same

      And it’s a lie that we are all the same. negative People are generally different. Especially different in national mentality. But, many do not know and do not understand fool , like the author of the article.

      It all depends on the degree of approximation! On closer inspection, people and tomatoes are two related species!
  2. +9
    5 October 2017 06: 57
    At least the film gave rise to "true Ukrainians" to go to the waste of human life and scream to the point of madness that this is a lie. So the film was a success!
    1. +12
      5 October 2017 08: 07
      Quote: rotmistr60
      At least the film gave rise to "true Ukrainians" to go to the waste of human life and scream to the point of madness that this is a lie. So the film was a success!

      From the latest news from Ukraine: raccoons climbed into the store, smashed everything and drank vodka in the trash.
      Is it really fighting Russian raccoons? belay
      Banderlog want to return the Crimea? And they asked Crimeans? Even before the liberation of Crimea from the power of banderlogs, the Ukrainian side triednels that in Crimea there are more Russian-speaking, because a significant part of military pensioners. Modern young Crimeans, as I believe, do not jump, but build their future. Watch the video on YouTube how banderlogs tried to enter Balbek airport. With banners, a formation, a choir and a throat about a puppy not dead. The green man ordered: stand, shoot, the commander is to me. Banderlogs yelled: America is with us ...
      Then they turned and wandered back.
      The film is seen in fragments, embellished, but realistic. Moyahataskraintsev occasion to think about their fate, the Crimeans made a choice. hi
      As for back to the past, wouldn’t Crimea have turned into Syria-Somalia in one glass:
      US instructors in Syrian Et-Tanf, who previously trained and armed opposition opposition forces in Syria, are now openly training ISIS terrorists and supplying them with weapons, ammunition, equipment, and food.
      Forgetting caution, they allowed the capture of high-ranking ISIS militants by the Syrian special forces and material evidence of the work of this group for foreign intelligence services.
      The correspondent of the "Russian Spring", located in Syria, said a representative of the state security agencies of the SAR ("Mukhabarat"), he also provided a photo from the scene.
      1. +2
        5 October 2017 12: 16
        Quote: Balu
        Even before the liberation of Crimea from the power of banderlogs, the Ukrainian side triednels that in Crimea there are more Russian-speaking, because a significant part of military pensioners.

        And now Ukrainians are actively traveling to Crimea (receiving Russian citizenship). Isn’t it that in a few years to hold a “reverse” referendum?
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. +3
        5 October 2017 09: 44
        Greetings. a lion hi It’s not in vain that I took them (“true”) in quotation marks. These are just the people you list. And Valtsman’s statement about who is at the origins of Ukraine and which language is the most popular is already pulling for a prize. I doubt that he was completely sober, or already completely drank the brains.
  3. +16
    5 October 2017 07: 19
    I looked yesterday. There were 5 people in the hall. The film as a whole made an impression. But I didn’t notice forward to the future. The beast will remain the beast. A centurion from Maidan seemed to sympathize with the film’s heroine, but was ready to kill her for the sake of “Ukraine USE” Yes, and the heroine herself on the set doesn’t understand which film says (makes a reservation?) That Crimea is a temporarily occupied territory. And the strange remarks and actions of the heroine (generally sane and thinking) show that the Bandera virus sits firmly in her body and is unlikely to come out, and there is no one to treat.
    There are purely propaganda blunders. For example, a military transport operator of the Russian Federation comes in to land at Bilbek airfield. A fighter of dill is being intercepted. For some reason, the transporter is without cover. The ukroVKS pilot receives an order to bring him down, but at the last moment refuses to fulfill the order. Well, like, there are PEOPLE in this country.
    The atmosphere in the Crimea in front of the landing party of Maidan is well shown. That is yes. And so, the film is among the talk shows of our TV which is trying to change the consciousness of ukrov in our favor. But I think this is unlikely to succeed. Every day of this power in Ukraine, we lose people. And hardly change anything. The disease has gone too deep and only surgery can relieve it.
    1. +9
      5 October 2017 09: 25
      Quote: SCHWERIN
      I looked yesterday. There were 5 people in the hall. The film as a whole made an impression. But I didn’t notice forward to the future.

      I learned about him the other day, and the main news is a complete failure at the box office, which you only confirmed on a personal example hi It seems to me that they released him late, because the euphoria has long passed and harsh everyday life has remained - the war in the Donbass, the closure of the channel to the Crimea, and the closure of the land corridor, while there were still problems with the service ... According to rumors, this the film was released as an additional campaign for Putin for the upcoming elections
      Quote: SCHWERIN
      And so, the film is among the talk shows of our TV which is trying to change the consciousness of ukrov in our favor.
      Yes, Ukrainians do not watch our talk shows, they have their own, with the same clowns, it’s more likely that our minds are sent where they need to
      1. +8
        5 October 2017 10: 58
        I watched this film in the afternoon, I don’t know how in the evening or on Sundays. I do not believe in reconciliation. The tactics of Bandera are simple and very effective. In the 40s they tested it on the population. They strangled (it was used not a firearm, but strangulation) of those who were against them. The NKVD fought with them for a long time, many of them joined the "heavenly hundred." But the remaining Khrushchev pardoned and released. They lurked and waited in the wings for revenge. And got it. Then Gorby with EBN gave them the opportunity to do what they want .....
        The main character of this film has their hatred inside. She sometimes does not even hide her. Although before the Maidan probably did not even think about it
        1. +1
          5 October 2017 22: 30
          Quote: SCHWERIN
          The tactics of Bandera are simple and very effective.

          This is not tactics, but an innate instinct - to kill ... and kill sadistically.
        2. 0
          10 October 2017 13: 03
          First saw Bandera in the early 90's. It was something beyond comprehension. They were already maidanutye then. It is a pity that the police did not give free rein to people. Guarded this march, as now gay in Kiev. IT WAS THE MARCH OF THE NAZIS.
          1. 0
            10 October 2017 14: 55
            This is a modern "Europeanized" Bandera. And you look on the Internet the memories of people about the "exploits" of those in the 40s - 50s. After a short reading, the hairs stand on end. And a lot of women they taxied ...
      2. +3
        5 October 2017 15: 00
        Quote: Stirbjorn
        they have their own, with the same clowns,

        there is no time and desire either on their own or on Russian ...
        The people rightly believe that the "box" by definition will not tell the truth.
  4. +20
    5 October 2017 08: 03
    Frankly weak. cheap film in every sense. It seems that it is made only for public relations on a patriotic theme and cut dough. Left a depressing impression of lies. Just another "Matilda" and "Stalingrad"
    1. +7
      5 October 2017 11: 35
      Well, do not offend Stalingrad, a rather solid film and went to China) If Bondarchuk also saws, then he saws qualitatively. This same miracle is hardly a movie even to name) they took off on a knee for a week with a cheap camera,) see who shot it, be surprised) propagandists from the first channel led by Pimanov, even Bondarchuk refused to go into this propaganda masterpiece)
  5. +14
    5 October 2017 09: 10
    Bullshit is me about this opus of a certain Podolyaka. Even if the author does not accept a different point of view, it doesn’t matter. It’s important how he urges us to try to reconcile in the future (as he tries to vaparize us in this opus) maydanut, anti-maydanut and others Khataskraynikov. How does he see life in one space of the victims of Odessa Khatyn and those who burned them ??
    We all (again, “we all”) will soon return (in the political sense, and to whom physically) to Ukraine. What will we bring to its inhabitants? Hatred and hidden anger? Then you should not come back.
    Is it yet to come ... Or maybe not? Do we need it? Or will we step on this disgusting Ukrainian rake again ?? And then, who carried and continues to bear hatred and anger in Ukraine, like the Ukrainians themselves? Are we again? And again, same- "then you should not come back" ... That is, according to the author, if we do not "open our fraternal embrace" and carry the "punishing sword of justice", then we have nothing to do there! Is the author worried about banderlog? , yes, there are no Bandera there:
    And therefore, there are neither Bandera ghouls, nor elves fighting with them.
    there are intoxicated "people like us" who simply kill, burn people! But they need to be "understood and forgiven", otherwise there is nothing for us to do there! The author is a provocateur who, with such logical tricks, is trying once again to boil a rotten product about that Russia can’t escape from the salvation of Ukraine and once again have to return there (read-invest money), but at the same time, understand and forgive everyone. Forgetting about anger, hatred and the “punishing sword of justice.” ..I have no words... request negative
  6. +10
    5 October 2017 09: 30
    On film search, this film confidently breaks the bottom of the ranking.
    1. +3
      5 October 2017 09: 42
      Quote: Ken71
      On film search, this film confidently breaks the bottom of the ranking.

      Konstantin, did not look, but I condemn. laughing Go, look, and then evaluate. Maybe you are right, but I didn’t look, so I can’t say anything. hi
      1. +3
        5 October 2017 10: 19
        I do not blame. I just set out the information. It will be sure to look at torrents. I wonder how you can make a movie with such a low rating.
        1. +3
          5 October 2017 12: 00
          Quote: Ken71
          It will be sure to watch torrents

          Here I am also, spending time and money going to the cinema is something not hunting, and yes you are right that I did not see the queues in the city for cinemas. hi
          Quote: Ken71
          I wonder how you can make a movie with such a low rating.

          With budget money withdrawn, or rather mastered. hi
        2. 0
          5 October 2017 14: 20
          It will be sure to look at torrents.

          Yes, I’m already downloading Yes
          1. +1
            5 October 2017 14: 25
            A rag or something. I’ll wait a decent version anyway.
  7. +7
    5 October 2017 09: 37
    Well, yes, yes ...
    Humanism (not what teens secretly do ...), "Louboff" and all that jazz ...
    However - observe how - to a minimum! - 50% of the population of "Ukraine" approve and support with varying degrees of zeal the Nazis - fascists! - .... There is no documentary or “highly artistic” “cinema” like this - it will not help to change the opinion (and okay, just the opinion!) About the “former fraternal”! ... And they “rested”: makes itself felt Slavic is all the same blood! They fed them in the Union on their own neck ... Resources - to rob and ruin the "powders" and "Saakashvili" for another 100 years is enough!
  8. +2
    5 October 2017 09: 44
    one of the readers will tell you what else he saw in this film
    There is a world information war and we are all disabled
    1. 0
      5 October 2017 12: 46
      Quote: Olddetractor
      we are all her disabled

      How to stay healthy?
      1. 0
        8 October 2017 04: 32
        Perceive different information. Subject to its analysis with the search for reasons, not reasons. Draw conclusions based on the highest human values.
  9. +6
    5 October 2017 10: 38
    These 25 years of "Ukrainization" of Ukraine were given to us, so that we understand that we are different. But not one "one people". And do not throw out this knowledge.
  10. +5
    5 October 2017 11: 55
    The film "Crimea", or Back to the Future of Ukraine

    no.This is a constant return to the past of Ukraine, to the very past in which the fierce hatred of the Russians on that land was born. And always, as soon as Russia loses control over the territory of Ukraine, this hatred will splash out on the square, burn new trade union houses, destroying anyone who at least somehow associates itself with the Russian world.

    And so there are no Bandera ghouls

    "maybe there was no war
    and father’s birth scars "


    we are one people with those who associate themselves with the Russian world and those who associate themselves with Bandera and the Western world.
    The 90s made the naive Russian people cynical and thanks to this we are almost completely indifferent to the exposures of Navalny and others.
    We are not snot about a dead bird, but we will not forget anyone and we will not forgive anyone for killing, persecution.
    The war clearly divides the people into people with whom you can talk and nonhumans whom you only need to destroy.
  11. +1
    5 October 2017 12: 42
    Normal movie! Once you can see for sure! If someone is looking for documentaries, blood and meat, this is not for you. A normal love story in a crazy world, broken by mattresses, tolerance and so on.
  12. 0
    5 October 2017 12: 58
    I have not seen the film, but I approve, I hope to see in DVD format with a flea market!
  13. +3
    5 October 2017 13: 03
    After reading the reviews, I even wanted to watch the movie. Although, I confess, I used to hear opinions about him mostly as an unsuccessful campaign material. Respect the author for the way he outlined his position and plot of the film.
    With only one significant BUT. The author optimistically believes: "We all (again," we all ") will soon have to return (in a political sense, and to whom, and physically) to Ukraine." Taking into account the current situation, it’s not very soon, I think ... Not very soon ...
  14. +1
    5 October 2017 15: 12
    Quote: populist
    And in order to start looking for this path, we must first understand that we are all the same: maidanut, anti-maidanut and all those who did not fit into this family showdown. Yes, we have different “garbage” in our brains, but we are all the same the same

    And it’s a lie that we are all the same. negative People are generally different. Especially different in national mentality. But, many do not know and do not understand fool , like the author of the article.

    Different .. and similar .. and this at the same time. The author is somewhat naive, but kindly. Do you offer all people to fight with everyone? Is man a wolf to man?
  15. +4
    5 October 2017 15: 23
    He imagined what a Russophobian anti-Orthodox libel would have turned out if he had been removed by the order of a medina from Alexei Yefimovich, a teacher. I would immediately take prizes at Cannes and the Oscars
  16. +5
    5 October 2017 17: 30
    Damn, well, you commented here, I still write too.
    1. Of course we are DIFFERENT, all people are different and this is a fact.
    2. The fact that we are different Ukrainians, has nothing to do with what is happening. We men and women are MUCH MORE DIFFERENT, WE ARE AT THE GENE LEVEL DIFFERENT and somehow we are not trying to drive each other abroad.
    3. The difference does not interfere with living together in the world, if it interferes, it is a xenophobia disease. It is necessary to treat it.
    4. You cannot live side by side in peace with those who are trying to destroy others (or make them the same as themselves). A classic example with whom one cannot live in peace is the fascists. And by the way, the Communists, in their Bolshevik incarnation, also tried to destroy others, to destroy as a class.
    5. We are NOT doomed to live together, NEARBY - YES TOGETHER-NO.
    1. +2
      8 October 2017 04: 42
      Quote: bk316
      And by the way, the Communists, in their Bolshevik incarnation, also tried to destroy others, to destroy as a class.

      "Iksperd ..."
      Communism denies private property. The Communists selected it in favor of the state, and applied repressive measures to those who disagree. The bourgeoisie could well have remained intact and at large if in the process of selecting property they were silent in a rag, but who would be silent ...
      1. +2
        9 October 2017 12: 00
        The bourgeoisie could well have remained intact and at large if in the process of selecting property they were silent in a rag, but who would be silent ...


        You, like most apologists, cannot read carefully, probably since the 20s.
        I wrote:
        You can’t live together in peace with those who are trying to destroy others (or make them the same as themselves).

        Of course, the bourgeoisie could remain intact giving everything, that is, becoming the same as the Bolsheviks.

        That is why it is impossible to live side by side with the Bolsheviks in peace.


        And apparently you didn’t read your classics, because you don’t know the phrase “like a class” often used by Lenin So that would not look silly read at least the works of those whom you love so much ...
        1. +1
          9 October 2017 14: 33
          Quote: bk316
          Of course, the bourgeois could remain intact giving everything, that is, becoming the same as the Bolsheviks

          You wrote this nonsense, who do you think you are a genius?
          It’s a pity that the rules forbid you to directly name how to evaluate your pearl.
          Quote: bk316
          You cannot live side by side in peace with those who are trying to destroy others (or make them the same as themselves).

          Therefore, in the 20s of the 20th century, did the likes of you unleash the Civil with reliance on ANTANTA?
          Thank you for your recognition.
          Quote: bk316
          That is why it is impossible to live side by side with the Bolsheviks in peace.

          The Bolsheviks .. from the word MOST, therefore, the inhabitants of Crimea who did not want to live under the rule of the Bandera junta can be called Bolsheviks, and you, you, as always, in the past, buy-sells, compradors, who were forced to appeal to patriotic feelings of the people, hiding their own, through and through, anti-people gut and motives.
          In essence, you are no different from Bandera’s in your anti-Sovietism-anti-communism.
          1. +2
            9 October 2017 17: 23
            Bolsheviks ... from the word MOST

            No verbiage, you perfectly understand what I had in mind the AUCPB, if you do not understand, go to school, here you have no place.

            You wrote this nonsense, who do you think you are a genius?

            This is not I wrote, this is Ulyanov (Lenin). I quote from memory: the goal of the socialist revolution in relation to the national bourgeoisie is to eradicate them as a class, change their place in public life and, above all, their attitude to the means of production ....
            And now, a little from me, I chew what Lenin said, although he said this for the illiterate masses of workers and peasants. By depriving the capitalist of his means of production, you automatically turn him into a declassified element, a lumpen proletarian or a lumpen peasant, that is, precisely those on whom the Bolsheviks relied.
            Therefore, in the 20s of the 20th century, did the likes of you unleash the Civil with reliance on ANTANTA?

            Yes, that's why the national bourgeoisie, officers, priests and most of the intelligentsia did not accept the Bolsheviks. I really have nothing to do with it.
            In essence, you are no different from Bandera’s in your anti-Sovietism-anti-communism.

            Do not dare yourself to appropriate the right to determine who is a patriot and who is not. Judging by your posts, you are a dogmatic, poorly educated, fanatic. Such are the pillars of fascists of all stripes and senses.
            You wrote this nonsense, who do you think you are a genius?

            I didn’t imagine myself, I just, unlike you, studied history and Marxist-Leninist philosophy in the USSR and by the way successfully passed the candidate minimum. Therefore, the cries of slogans by people who do not even understand their essence cause me only disgust.
            1. +1
              9 October 2017 17: 34
              Quote: bk316
              No verbiage, you perfectly understand what I had in mind the AUCPB, if you do not understand, go to school, here you have no place.

              What you have there and where, to her, is of little interest to her, because with your knowledge if you go to school ... then I'm afraid not everyone will take up your training.
              Quote: bk316
              I quote from memory: the goal of the socialist revolution in relation to the national bourgeoisie is to eradicate them as a class, change their place in public life and, above all, their attitude to the means of production ....

              Is it right to say why they are not happy? Should they be hunchbacked at you? Or is it fair to receive what you have earned without rent to the bourgeois who is so blatant from greed?
              Quote: bk316
              Yes, that's why the national bourgeoisie, officers, priests and most of the intelligentsia did not accept the Bolsheviks. I really have nothing to do with it.

              The opinion of that bourgeoisie, who miscalculated the country, is of little interest to me; February itself conceived of them, and they themselves disappeared from October, when the people realized that, apart from chatter and yoke, all this public bears nothing for a halt.
              Officers? More than half served with the Reds — the best part of the officers.
              Intelligentsia? Proudly escaping on steamboats, the road is there, the real intelligentsia has remained in the country.
              Priests? And ..that those in Karlovac made a split, creating the ROCOR, and then serving prayers to Hitler for his victory ... but who in the country did they need?
              Quote: bk316
              Do not dare yourself to appropriate the right to determine who is a patriot and who is not

              I just dare and have the right to do so. Every anti-Soviet, anti-communist inevitably slides into Russophobia. You have already slipped there, denying the achievements of the Russian people in the history of Russia when it was the USSR.
              Quote: bk316
              I didn’t imagine myself as anyone, I just, unlike you, studied history and Marxist-Leninist philosophy in the USSR and by the way successfully passed the candidate minimum.

              It’s called running up and running over the tops. But they didn’t understand anything at all and didn’t understand what they are demonstrating here. The barren intelligentsia, called to be the brain of the nation, but in fact it turned out to be .... further, highly learned candidate, continue or give a footnote for a full quote?
              Quote: bk316
              Therefore, the cries of slogans by people who do not even understand their essence cause me only disgust.

              Indeed, people like you, it is precisely this feeling that they evoke, earnestly praying to one gods, outbid and just as passionately serve others — who are you to name?
              Or do you yourself choose the name of your role from the same philosophy that you so vehemently hate now?
    2. 0
      9 October 2017 14: 35
      Quote: bk316
      Damn, well, you commented here, I still write too.

      You, the National Democratic position in fact, Russophobic in fact, why are you giving these nasty-smelling pancakes?
      1. +2
        9 October 2017 17: 26
        You, the National Democratic position in fact, Russophobic in fact, why are you giving these nasty-smelling pancakes?

        You give out pancakes here, and people in VO can have any position, there’s not yet a branch of the Russian Federation am
        1. 0
          9 October 2017 18: 23
          Quote: bk316
          Pancakes here you give out

          Are you sir, why did you discover a pancake with the fumes of Russophobia?
          And what does the Communist Party in this case?
          Have you seen my party membership card, which term I didn’t have?
          Accept something soothing, that you are completely excited to write complete nonsense. fool
  17. 0
    5 October 2017 17: 55
    By the way, filmed for Russian budget money and clearly commissioned from the very top !!!
    - there wouldn’t be anything bad if, with money and with the support of the state ministry of culture and the cinematography committee, as a rule, the frank slag of Bondarchuk, Mikhalkov and others was not removed ...
  18. +3
    5 October 2017 18: 31
    VERY STRONG FILM CRIMEA
    Crimeans lagged behind their land people and the freedom to live in their own home in RUSSIA.
    good good good
  19. +2
    5 October 2017 20: 52
    I didn’t watch a movie, but I liked the article as a whole.
  20. +11
    6 October 2017 22: 14
    I watched a movie today. The girl in the film is very "tidying up." Probably there were such. During these events, my youngest daughter went to work peacefully in the neighborhood of the Maidan (at the end of the university I managed to get a well-paid job in the capital). I then, in February 2014 of the year, asked her what was going on there. She, I think, like most Kievans, dismissed it - nothing serious, it is only a pity that burnt tires spoiled the entire city center. I think that in the Maidan, as well as in the SPB-1917 coup, the "indignant population" did not participate. Activists were of course from Kiev. These are the conclusions I made in February 2014 of the year based on the results of communication with my daughter. There is, however, one BUT - she is a Sevastopol girl. After the coup, I immediately said that in the east of Ukraine there will be a war, and that banderlogs will not even turn up in Crimea. Here I was not mistaken. In Skype, it is still interesting to read our correspondence. And I suggested that my daughter “blame” from there, since for a woman safety is one of the fundamental values. Moreover, “such a high salary” in Murmansk is paid in the wardrobe. Now all is Glory to God. A daughter in the suburbs got a job in a specialty with a decent salary ...

    In the fall of 2014, I went to Feodosia to talk with my classmates. Then they were about 60 (who more, who less). Everyone would take up arms. Kneading in the Crimea would be concrete if our "polite people" hadn’t quenched it. I don’t know about Sevastopol (as in the film), but over Feodosia, the guys were telling, combat helicopters staged an impressive "roundabout".

    And the film - I liked it.

    Quote: Petrol cutter
    I didn’t watch a movie, but I liked the article as a whole.

  21. +2
    8 October 2017 09: 55
    The film is frankly weak. Both in the quality of the footage and in the scenario. I am curious. Does Putin sometimes watch our movie masterpieces? To shoot such a weak film on such a topic as the annexation of Crimea is not good. It is harmful. Moreover, it is not clear why Pimenov did not get into his own genre. He is closer to documentary and history. I decided to apparently try myself in a new role for budget money. If I really wanted to shoot something with action elements, I would have shot a film in the style of the Soviet action movie "In the zone of special attention" or something like that. A love line would be drawn between our citizens. From the assignment, the commander waits for his wife and children, an ordinary girl with whom he quarreled before leaving on a special business trip or something like that. Maidan generally had to be shown in the form of newsreels. And the author, for some reason, crawls into the whole kitchen trying to show that there are people there too, only they are drugged by the virus of nationalism. Question. What for? We let them go back in the early 90s and they joyfully rushed to Bendery. Rushed it means this is their choice, but let them know that in which case we take Lviv and the point. Respect only the strong and uncompromising. As a result, it turns out that the authors of the film swung to embrace everything in one picture, but in fact a long video clip of some kind of justifying property came out. When viewing, in fact, there is a feeling that the author is trying to justify the return of the Crimea. This in my opinion should not be. Crimean land is too abundantly watered with the blood of Russian soldiers to make excuses to anyone. Crimea was rightfully returned and everyone should know about it, and those who doubt should be ready, in which case, to correct our army. PMC.
  22. +1
    8 October 2017 13: 24
    We all (again, “we all”) will soon return (in the political sense, and to whom physically) to Ukraine
    -----------------------------------------
    Who decided that? !!! And what, again, "brotherly help" !!? May be enough?! Somehow we raise the Crimea! Duck, he is strategically important to us and there are all our people! And they proved it in 2014 !!! And these diving ducks do not bother me! Build a wall and fill everything with concrete ..............................
  23. +3
    9 October 2017 03: 16
    The film did not like for two reasons. 1) The script is frankly weak. I expected more from the film. You don’t need to argue with me, this is my opinion, but you can write your own in the comments or keep it with you. 2) In the film, an open box regarding the moment when the Su-27 of the Ukrainian Air Force allegedly refused to open fire on IL-76 of the Russian Air Force. Yes, the Ukrainian Air Force did not open Su-27 fire, but .... The Il-76 VKS of the Russian Federation went under the cover of Su-27SM fighter aircraft of the Russian Federation. So, having opened fire on the Il-76 of the Russian Air Force, the Ukrainian Su-27 itself would have been guaranteed to be shot down by the return fire of the Su-27SM of the Russian Federation ... Ukrainian fighters didn’t even approach the Il-76, and having noticed the fighters of the Russian Federation, they immediately left the area. No need to ask how I know this, I know that's all ...
    1. +2
      9 October 2017 12: 04
      I immediately drew attention to this. A lone transporter without cover, everyone is waiting for the ukroletchik to open fire. Yes, for that. Now you can lose the epaulette. Why is this shown? Show - are they human? I do not believe after DLNR. Reminds me - the German proletariat will not shoot at its brothers. Already passed.
  24. +3
    9 October 2017 11: 44
    The movie didn’t work out. I don’t know how anyone, but all this feeling of shame caused me some ..
  25. 0
    9 October 2017 14: 13
    Yes, we have different “garbage” in our brains, but we are all the same the same

    I don’t understand what kind of “garbage” the author is broadcasting in my head? That I consider Bandera and his current fans in Ukraine to be my enemies? What do I have to wait when they drag me to Moskalyaku? Or is someone here in Russia shouting that it’s time to cut Ukrainians?
    What are we the same in?
    Or will the author start whining an old song about brothers? So in Ukraine they themselves spit on this relationship. They don’t want to know you, brother-relative. And you keep pouring to them with your kindred saliva.
    And the film is about this - no matter how Russian is killed in Ukraine, our “brotherly” drool does not dry out.
  26. 0
    9 October 2017 19: 54
    I saw the film - I did not like it, very very weak in every sense. I do not advise spending my time and money on it ... There were 12 people in the hall, this is in Moscow in the evening session .. I hope Salute-7 will be normal ..... I will go to it 100% ....
  27. 0
    9 October 2017 20: 58
    I’ll see how a movie appears on the net. But judging by the noise raised around the film, he himself is not a masterpiece. Most likely agitation .. I’ll have a look, I’ll make an opinion ...
    By discussion .. When a close relative crosses a certain line, the one that makes him a relative, he ceases to be one. If a person steps over the line giving him the right to be a person, the effect is the same .. Unfortunately, the majority in Ukraine crossed both sides. And those who did not cross quietly hid, hating everyone ...
    Therefore no return ... And forgiveness ...
  28. 0
    10 October 2017 12: 49
    I’ll support you at 100. I haven’t seen it, I won’t lie, but the film was announced as about LOVE !!! I did NOT APPLY FOR documentary reflection of events !!!