The IAEA could not determine the type of charge tested in the DPRK

40
The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether a bomb tested in North Korea was hydrogen RIA News message of the head of the organization Yukiya Amano.





We cannot determine whether it was a hydrogen bomb or not. But it is obvious that the scale was much larger than the previous ones (tests). This means that North Korea has made very rapid progress. In combination with other elements, this is a new threat and it is a global threat,
said Amano, while visiting Seoul.

He also stressed that "the IAEA wants to play a role (on the DPRK issue) when the development of the political situation allows it."

Recall, September 3 Pyongyang announced the successful testing of a hydrogen warhead, which is designed to equip the ICBM. Tokyo and Seoul rated its power in 160 kilotons, which is 10 times the power of the atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima in 1945 year. In total, this is the sixth nuclear test on the territory of the DPRK.
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    29 September 2017 10: 39
    IAEA The UN reminds me. Also work in the USA!

    Only we have no veto right there.
    1. +4
      29 September 2017 10: 43
      Eun will have to take a word if the other is not proven. laughing
      1. +17
        29 September 2017 10: 45
        Let your feelings be believed!
        Let them feel that their ...
      2. +3
        29 September 2017 10: 46
        The IAEA could not determine the type of charge tested in the DPRK
        The IAEA could not ... the Americans could not ... the Japanese could not ..
        Eun seems to have paid everyone ...
        1. +2
          29 September 2017 11: 23
          Quote: Dead Day
          Eun seems to have paid everyone ...

          If only he did not play too much, otherwise he would devote himself and not notice ...
      3. +2
        29 September 2017 11: 23
        Quote: siberalt
        Eun will have to take a word if the other is not proven.

        HOW more he will have to, otherwise he’s got enough mind, to bang a stronger charge ...
    2. +1
      29 September 2017 11: 33
      IAEA The UN reminds me. Also work in the USA!

      You just realized it now ..? It has long been known that under the cover of the IAEA, agents of the American special services are working.
  2. +6
    29 September 2017 10: 42
    IMHO: finally a more or less sound idea. After all, obtaining one of the components of nuclear weapons is a rather stressful process even for Russia (USSR). Well, they couldn’t get it in the DPRK so simply! If someone didn’t help only ...
  3. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 42
    It doesn’t matter what kind of charge hit a power of 160 Kt. It must be taken for granted that the DPRK has such a charge and that Kim III may have the intelligence to bang it somewhere more objectively.
    And the IAEA is just the IAEA and for Kim it is nothing more than an American appendage.
  4. +2
    29 September 2017 10: 42
    And this is interesting ..... Or, Iran presented, for testing. Or....
    And after all, the contracts are not violated, but what is the demand for “man-rocket”?
  5. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 42
    Well done North Koreans. good
  6. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 43
    We have no way to determine ...
    “The IAEA wants to play a role (on the DPRK issue), when it allows the development of the political situation».

    The IAEA clearly defines only what the United States needs today. It is not for nothing that the Americans began to howl that Russia is trying to influence this organization.
  7. +6
    29 September 2017 10: 48
    This means that North Korea has made very quick progress.

    In light of the recent statements of the trump, accelerated ...
    1. +4
      29 September 2017 10: 53
      not a fact! maybe they’re bluntly bluffing - they blew up an explosive ship underground - and yelling: “we have a big bomb,” and as they’re not afraid, a little Korea will break off
      1. +5
        29 September 2017 11: 07
        Bluffing, not bluffing ... check, I think, there is no one who wants to ... wink
        1. +4
          29 September 2017 11: 17
          that's for sure!!
      2. +3
        29 September 2017 11: 11
        Quote: novel xnumx
        blew up an explosive ship underground

        160 kilotons / 1600 kg / m3 / 138 m3 = 725 TNT wagons.
        1. +3
          29 September 2017 11: 14
          have explosives and more powerful
        2. +7
          29 September 2017 12: 10
          725 TNT cars.

          yes no - consider a simple wagon loading capacity of 65 tons, totaling approximately 2500 wagons.
          1. +9
            29 September 2017 12: 20
            I would rather believe in a hydrogen bomb than in 2 wagons! laughing
            1. +3
              29 September 2017 13: 01
              definitely, they’ll still not explode instantly as you don’t try
    2. +7
      29 September 2017 12: 01
      Trump - as an engine of progress. Cool laughing
  8. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 49
    Quote: LAWNER
    And this is interesting ..... Or, Iran presented, for testing. Or....
    And after all, the contracts are not violated, but what is the demand for “man-rocket”?

    ----------------------------
    The rocket man’s point and rockets became pretty good, literally in three years they were so progressive from the V-2, roughly speaking, because the rockets deviated from the trajectory or exploded, to the present Hwason-12.
    1. +3
      29 September 2017 10: 54
      glory to Ukraine!!! lol
      1. Ren
        +1
        29 September 2017 13: 41
        Quote: novel xnumx
        glory to Ukraine!!!

        And Eunu Glory!
        Death to Korean enemies (USA)! wassat
        1. +3
          29 September 2017 13: 58
          give korean in korean!
  9. +3
    29 September 2017 10: 54
    For those who are "off topic." A nuclear (often called atomic) bomb has a limit on the power of the charge. Most of the uranium 235 or plutonium 239 vaporizes during the explosion before it can react.
    There is no such limitation in a thermonuclear bomb. And the “usual” charge cannot be made more than a few kilotons, in my opinion, less than 100 turns out ...
    1. 0
      29 September 2017 11: 09
      And the “normal” charge does not work to make more than a few kilotons, in my opinion, less than 100 turns out

      And the guys in the IAEA do not know! wassat
      They would know if they hadn’t wondered what kind of 160 kilotons they blew up.
      I respect drinks
      "+"!
  10. 0
    29 September 2017 10: 55
    Quote: 32363
    Well done North Koreans. good

    For some reason I have a different opinion about this and I think there are more sane people, there is nothing good in these tests, both from an environmental point of view and from the point of view of increasing the situation in this region. Eun just played too much.
  11. +6
    29 September 2017 11: 09
    Stop ignoring Eun! He made a very good application for joining the Nuclear Club.
    It is time to invite him to all organizations related to these matters. And respectfully.
    Only then will it be safe for the world. This is logical.
    Yes, here, where did you see the logic of the Western "progressors" ...
    1. +1
      29 September 2017 11: 25
      Right Eun is evil because he doesn’t have an iPhone.
      Teach him Pokemon to catch,
      Only then will it be safe for the world. This is logical.
      laughing wink
  12. +2
    29 September 2017 11: 12
    was the hydrogen bomb tested in south korea

    Maybe still in North Korea?
  13. +1
    29 September 2017 11: 19
    Quote: Corsair0304
    It doesn’t matter what kind of charge hit a power of 160 Kt. It must be taken for granted that the DPRK has such a charge and that Kim III may have the intelligence to bang it somewhere more objectively.

    South Korea, the United States and this hang their minimum estimate to 250 Kton, but maybe a bit and 500 Kton.
    Kim, they don’t believe the word, he’ll have to show him everything in the real mashabah somewhere in the Pacific Ocean or in a big altitude. North Korea itself produces all the components and even offers some (lithium isotope) for export.
    1. +1
      29 September 2017 12: 52
      Somewhere over Japan at an altitude of 500 km ... and it will be a country of 2 rising suns wassat
  14. +2
    29 September 2017 11: 26
    Quote: yuliatreb
    For some reason I have a different opinion about this and I think there are more sane people, there is nothing good in these tests, both from an environmental point of view and from the point of view of increasing the situation in this region. Eun just played too much.

    Where did sane people beat when other states spent several hundred eating in the atmosphere? Then ecology was out of the question.
    From the point of view of the situation, if the DPRK nuclear weapons didn’t beat them there, the situation was bi-easy and pleasant, like in Iraq and Libya, but Kim likes the pressure and peace.
  15. 0
    29 September 2017 11: 38
    Quote: Altona
    The rocket man’s point and rockets became pretty good, literally in three years they were so progressive from the V-2, roughly speaking, because the rockets deviated from the trajectory or exploded, to the present Hwason-12.

    Somewhat make a mistake. North Korea has its first satellite in 2012. The Unha space rocket is still a little better than the V-2. By the way, the South Korean space rocket was a little late, although it had the first stage and the engines were Russian.
  16. +3
    29 September 2017 11: 43
    Hmm, what's the difference - a "simple" nuclear charge will kill you or will it be a thermonuclear charge? With a capacity of 300 kt, it will somehow be ....
    1. +2
      29 September 2017 12: 23
      From thermonuclear warmer laughing
  17. +2
    30 September 2017 15: 39
    [b] The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether it was tested in South Korea hydrogen bomb, [/ b]
    WHERE????? wassat
  18. +1
    30 September 2017 19: 24
    The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether it was tested in South Korea hydrogen bomb
    It should be fixed by changing South Korea to North. We, for the most part, are not Americans and the USE has not yet been so stupid as to confuse South Korea with the DPRK, but Australia with Austria.