The IAEA could not determine the type of charge tested in the DPRK

29 September 2017

The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether a bomb tested in North Korea was hydrogen RIA News message of the head of the organization Yukiya Amano.

We cannot determine whether it was a hydrogen bomb or not. But it is obvious that the scale was much larger than the previous ones (tests). This means that North Korea has made very rapid progress. In combination with other elements, this is a new threat and it is a global threat,

said Amano, while visiting Seoul.

He also stressed that "the IAEA wants to play a role (on the DPRK issue) when the development of the political situation allows it."

Recall, September 3 Pyongyang announced the successful testing of a hydrogen warhead, which is designed to equip the ICBM. Tokyo and Seoul rated its power in 160 kilotons, which is 10 times the power of the atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima in 1945 year. In total, this is the sixth nuclear test on the territory of the DPRK.

Photos used:: http://www.globallookpress.com

Military Reviewin Yandex News

Military Reviewin Yandex Zen

Abigor 29 September 2017 10: 39
+3

3

0
IAEA The UN reminds me. Also work in the USA!

Only we have no veto right there.
1. siberalt 29 September 2017 10: 43
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  Eun will have to take a word if the other is not proven.
  1. Logall 29 September 2017 10: 45
    
    +17
    
    17
    
    0
    
    Let your feelings be believed!
    Let them feel that their ...
  2. Grandfather 29 September 2017 10: 46
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    The IAEA could not determine the type of charge tested in the DPRK
    The IAEA could not ... the Americans could not ... the Japanese could not ..
    Eun seems to have paid everyone ...
    1. svp67 29 September 2017 11: 23
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      Quote: Dead Day
      Eun seems to have paid everyone ...
      
      If only he did not play too much, otherwise he would devote himself and not notice ...
  3. svp67 29 September 2017 11: 23
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    Quote: siberalt
    Eun will have to take a word if the other is not proven.
    
    HOW more he will have to, otherwise he’s got enough mind, to bang a stronger charge ...
2. igorj 51 29 September 2017 11: 33
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  IAEA The UN reminds me. Also work in the USA!
  
  You just realized it now ..? It has long been known that under the cover of the IAEA, agents of the American special services are working.
annodomene 29 September 2017 10: 42
+6

6

0
IMHO: finally a more or less sound idea. After all, obtaining one of the components of nuclear weapons is a rather stressful process even for Russia (USSR). Well, they couldn’t get it in the DPRK so simply! If someone didn’t help only ...
Corsair0304 29 September 2017 10: 42
+3

3

0
It doesn’t matter what kind of charge hit a power of 160 Kt. It must be taken for granted that the DPRK has such a charge and that Kim III may have the intelligence to bang it somewhere more objectively.
And the IAEA is just the IAEA and for Kim it is nothing more than an American appendage.
LAWNER 29 September 2017 10: 42
+2

2

0
And this is interesting ..... Or, Iran presented, for testing. Or....
And after all, the contracts are not violated, but what is the demand for “man-rocket”?
32363 29 September 2017 10: 42
+3

3

0
Well done North Koreans.
rotmistr60 29 September 2017 10: 43
+3

3

0
We have no way to determine ...
“The IAEA wants to play a role (on the DPRK issue), when it allows the development of the political situation».

The IAEA clearly defines only what the United States needs today. It is not for nothing that the Americans began to howl that Russia is trying to influence this organization.
Masya masya 29 September 2017 10: 48
+6

6

0
This means that North Korea has made very quick progress.

In light of the recent statements of the trump, accelerated ...
1. novel66 29 September 2017 10: 53
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  not a fact! maybe they’re bluntly bluffing - they blew up an explosive ship underground - and yelling: “we have a big bomb,” and as they’re not afraid, a little Korea will break off
  1. Masya masya 29 September 2017 11: 07
    
    +5
    
    5
    
    0
    
    Bluffing, not bluffing ... check, I think, there is no one who wants to ...
    1. novel66 29 September 2017 11: 17
      
      +4
      
      4
      
      0
      
      that's for sure!!
  2. igordok 29 September 2017 11: 11
    
    +2
    
    2
    
    0
    
    Quote: novel xnumx
    blew up an explosive ship underground
    
    160 kilotons / 1600 kg / m3 / 138 m3 = 725 TNT wagons.
    1. novel66 29 September 2017 11: 14
      
      +2
      
      2
      
      0
      
      have explosives and more powerful
    2. bk316 29 September 2017 12: 10
      
      +6
      
      6
      
      0
      
      725 TNT cars.
      
      yes no - consider a simple wagon loading capacity of 65 tons, totaling approximately 2500 wagons.
      1. Doliva63 29 September 2017 12: 20
        
        +8
        
        8
        
        0
        
        I would rather believe in a hydrogen bomb than in 2 wagons!
        
        bk316 29 September 2017 13: 01
        
        +3
        
        3
        
        0
        
        definitely, they’ll still not explode instantly as you don’t try
2. Doliva63 29 September 2017 12: 01
  +7
  
  7
  
  0
  Trump - as an engine of progress. Cool
Altona 29 September 2017 10: 49
+3

3

0
Quote: LAWNER
And this is interesting ..... Or, Iran presented, for testing. Or....
And after all, the contracts are not violated, but what is the demand for “man-rocket”?

----------------------------
The rocket man’s point and rockets became pretty good, literally in three years they were so progressive from the V-2, roughly speaking, because the rockets deviated from the trajectory or exploded, to the present Hwason-12.
1. novel66 29 September 2017 10: 54
  +3
  
  3
  
  0
  glory to Ukraine!!!
  1. Ren 29 September 2017 13: 41
    
    +1
    
    1
    
    0
    
    Quote: novel xnumx
    glory to Ukraine!!!
    
    And Eunu Glory!
    Death to Korean enemies (USA)!
    1. novel66 29 September 2017 13: 58
      
      +3
      
      3
      
      0
      
      give korean in korean!
Mountain shooter 29 September 2017 10: 54
+3

3

0
For those who are "off topic." A nuclear (often called atomic) bomb has a limit on the power of the charge. Most of the uranium 235 or plutonium 239 vaporizes during the explosion before it can react.
There is no such limitation in a thermonuclear bomb. And the “usual” charge cannot be made more than a few kilotons, in my opinion, less than 100 turns out ...
1. serriy 29 September 2017 11: 09
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  And the “normal” charge does not work to make more than a few kilotons, in my opinion, less than 100 turns out
  
  And the guys in the IAEA do not know!
  They would know if they hadn’t wondered what kind of 160 kilotons they blew up.
  I respect
  "+"!
yuliatreb 29 September 2017 10: 55
0

0

0
Quote: 32363
Well done North Koreans.

For some reason I have a different opinion about this and I think there are more sane people, there is nothing good in these tests, both from an environmental point of view and from the point of view of increasing the situation in this region. Eun just played too much.
japs 29 September 2017 11: 09
+6

6

0
Stop ignoring Eun! He made a very good application for joining the Nuclear Club.
It is time to invite him to all organizations related to these matters. And respectfully.
Only then will it be safe for the world. This is logical.
Yes, here, where did you see the logic of the Western "progressors" ...
1. serriy 29 September 2017 11: 25
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Right Eun is evil because he doesn’t have an iPhone.
  Teach him Pokemon to catch,
  Only then will it be safe for the world. This is logical.
pvv113 29 September 2017 11: 12
+2

2

0
was the hydrogen bomb tested in south korea

Maybe still in North Korea?
Kostadinov 29 September 2017 11: 19
+1

1

0
Quote: Corsair0304
It doesn’t matter what kind of charge hit a power of 160 Kt. It must be taken for granted that the DPRK has such a charge and that Kim III may have the intelligence to bang it somewhere more objectively.

South Korea, the United States and this hang their minimum estimate to 250 Kton, but maybe a bit and 500 Kton.
Kim, they don’t believe the word, he’ll have to show him everything in the real mashabah somewhere in the Pacific Ocean or in a big altitude. North Korea itself produces all the components and even offers some (lithium isotope) for export.
1. CooL_SnipeR 29 September 2017 12: 52
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  Somewhere over Japan at an altitude of 500 km ... and it will be a country of 2 rising suns
Kostadinov 29 September 2017 11: 26
+2

2

0
Quote: yuliatreb
For some reason I have a different opinion about this and I think there are more sane people, there is nothing good in these tests, both from an environmental point of view and from the point of view of increasing the situation in this region. Eun just played too much.

Where did sane people beat when other states spent several hundred eating in the atmosphere? Then ecology was out of the question.
From the point of view of the situation, if the DPRK nuclear weapons didn’t beat them there, the situation was bi-easy and pleasant, like in Iraq and Libya, but Kim likes the pressure and peace.
Kostadinov 29 September 2017 11: 38
0

0

0
Quote: Altona
The rocket man’s point and rockets became pretty good, literally in three years they were so progressive from the V-2, roughly speaking, because the rockets deviated from the trajectory or exploded, to the present Hwason-12.

Somewhat make a mistake. North Korea has its first satellite in 2012. The Unha space rocket is still a little better than the V-2. By the way, the South Korean space rocket was a little late, although it had the first stage and the engines were Russian.
Topotun 29 September 2017 11: 43
+3

3

0
Hmm, what's the difference - a "simple" nuclear charge will kill you or will it be a thermonuclear charge? With a capacity of 300 kt, it will somehow be ....
1. pilot306 29 September 2017 12: 23
  +2
  
  2
  
  0
  From thermonuclear warmer
kot28.ru 30 September 2017 15: 39
+2

2

0
[b] The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether it was tested in South Korea hydrogen bomb, [/ b]
WHERE?????
Vadmir 30 September 2017 19: 24
+1

1

0
The International Atomic Energy Agency was unable to determine whether it was tested in South Korea hydrogen bomb
It should be fixed by changing South Korea to North. We, for the most part, are not Americans and the USE has not yet been so stupid as to confuse South Korea with the DPRK, but Australia with Austria.