How Yaroslav the Wise helped restore Poland

16
After the death of Boleslav the Brave, Poland plunged into turmoil. The sons of the great king quarreled, started a war with each other. The great-magnates, who were able to eliminate the Boleslavites, rose up against them. The peasants, whom the secular and spiritual feudal lords quickly turned into slaves (cattle - "working cattle"), rose up against the gentry. Many remembered the old gods, pagan revolts began. Separated many areas where they began to rule their dynasties. Poland, as a state, virtually collapsed. Only Prince Casimir, with the support of the Holy Roman Empire and the great Russian Prince Yaroslav, was able to restore the state and its unity.

The collapse and restoration of Poland



The end of Boleslav the Brave's rule was marked by increasing instability - internal and external. With the Second Reich was the world, but cold. The Czech Republic and Hungary were unhappy with the capture of Moravia and Slovakia. In 1021, the Czech Republic was able to recapture Moravia. Boleslav was in conflict with the Catholic elite and the major feudal lords of Poland. In 1019-1022 there was a Russian-Polish war for the Cherven cities captured by Boleslav. Boleslav was able to keep Chervonnaya Rus under his rule. However, there was hostility between Russia and Poland.

In 1025, a few weeks after his coronation, Boleslaw the Brave dies. In Poland, strife begins between Boleslavichi - the new king Mieszko II and his brothers Besprim (Free) and Otton Boleslavichi. After the death of Boleslav, the brothers expected to receive part of the inheritance: according to the Slavic custom, the father had to divide the property into all the sons. However, the kingdom went to only one son. Bezprim and Otto fled to Kiev, under the wing of the great Russian prince Yaroslav the Wise. In Kiev, the brothers spent several years. At the same time, Otto entered into an alliance with the German Emperor Conrad, wanting to take away the Polish throne from his brother.



In 1030, Yaroslav launched a war with Poland and fought off the city of Belzy (Belz) in the region of Chervonnaya Rus. According to the Russian chronicles: “Yaroslav and Mstislav gathered many warriors, went to the Poles and occupied the cities of Chervensky again, and fought the Lyakh land; and many Poles were brought and divided: Yaroslav planted his own along Ros; and they remain there to this day. " Having mastered the cities of Cherven, the Russian princes continued their march into the depths of Poland in order to put Bezprima on the throne. The campaign of the Russian army in Poland was synchronized with the advance of the troops of the German emperor to the west. Meshko could not simultaneously stop the Russians and the Germans and was forced to flee to Bohemia (Czech Republic). In addition, many major secular and spiritual feudal lords opposed Meshko. Meshko, to fight Germany, concluded an alliance with the pagan tribes of the Lyutichs. This caused Mieszko’s discord with his entourage; he was even declared a pseudo-Christian. Bezprim with the support of Russian and German troops seized the throne of Poland and recognized the emperor's suzerainty. This displeased Otto and he moved to the camp of the supporters of Mieszko II.

The board of the besprima did not last long. It is believed that the cause of his fall was his extreme cruelty. According to the Annals of Hildesheim, he was killed by his own people no later than the spring of 1032. Probably the main conspirators were his half-brothers Mieszko II and Otto. The main conspirator was Otto, who remained in Germany. After the overthrow of the Bezprima, the country was divided into three parts: between Meshko II, Otto, and their cousin, the prince Dietrich (Piast). This led to a significant increase in the influence of the Holy Roman Empire (Germany) on the affairs of Poland. Sack II takes the oath to the emperor Konrad II and gives the land to the Second Reich of the Lusatians and milchanas. Poland lost its kingdom status for almost half a century and became a vassal of the Second Reich.

However, the victorious Boleslavichs did not rule for long. Otto died in 1033, he may have been killed by his vassals. In 1034, the conspirators killed Meshko. Poland plunged into turmoil. It is not even known who began to rule. According to one of the versions, the eldest son Mieszko Boleslav Forgotten occupied the throne. He ruled extremely unfortunate. Because of such activities, he was allegedly condemned to eternal oblivion ("the condemnation of memory"). His short reign, before 1037-1038, led to a confrontation between the great princes and large feudal lords. In Great and Little Poland, secular feudal lords were also supported by the spiritual (clergy). In Pomorie, local nobility resorted to the idea of ​​restoring paganism. The situation was similar in Mazovia. Death of the Grand Duke in 1037 or 1038 led to the beginning of the peasant war. The Russian Chronicle reports very briefly about this time: “there was a revolt in the land of Lyadsk: after rising, the bishops, the priests, the boyars, and the revolt were in them”. The peasant and pagan uprising shocked the entire Polish statehood. Only in large cities - Krakow, Poznan, Gniezno - somehow remained the remnants of the state apparatus. A single Polish state, in fact, did not exist then.

According to most historians, the Polish queen Ryks (Ricks) of Lorraine tried to rule after Meshko, who took custody of her young son Casimir. Ryksa tried to push the Polish nobles from power, and to rule with the help of the Germans loyal to her. The case ended with a new coup and the flight of Ryksy with children to Germany. Polish steel magnates rule in the name of the young King Casimir. But the situation was awful. In the country since the struggle of Boleslawicz, the struggle between the gentry and the peasantry, caused by the socio-economic and religious pressure of secular and spiritual feudal lords on the peasants, who were quickly enslaved. But they still remembered their past rights and freedoms. A large-scale peasant war began. In addition, Christianity, forcibly introduced in a pagan country, led to a response — a wide pagan rebellion. In Great Poland and Silesia, the church organization was destroyed, churches (churches) and monasteries were destroyed. Pomorie and Mazovia separated from Poland, where local dynasties were established. In 1038, the Czech army led by Břetislav took Gniezno. Perhaps the Czech prince wanted to take advantage of the distemper in Poland in order to take over most of the state. But in conditions of large-scale collapse and distemper, he could not and limited himself to seizing large booty, many prisoners and annexed Silesia with Wroclaw to the possessions of the Czech crown.

Russia during this period did not interfere in Polish affairs. Yaroslav was satisfied with the return of the “Cherven Grads”. Order in Poland was restored with the help of the Second Reich. Fearing the restoration of paganism in Poland and its subordination to the Czech Republic, Emperor Henry III decided to come to the aid of Casimir. With the help of the German troops in 1039, Casimir I (he reigned until 1058), nicknamed the Restorer, restored his power in Poland. Peasant and pagan uprisings suppressed, aristocrats pacified. However, for the help of the emperor, Poland recognized the suzerainty of the Holy Roman Empire.

Casimir, the Great Poland and Lesser Poland feudal lords did not have enough strength to restore the unity of the country. Then Casimir decided to ask for help from Russia. Casimir and Russian prince Yaroslav concluded an alliance. It was the greatest diplomatic success of Prince Casimir. Together they led the fight against Moislav (Maslava) - the former warrior Mieszko, who seized power in Mazovia. Moseslav was supported by the Prussians, Lithuanians and Pomors. In 1041, Yaroslav’s troops marched to Mazovia. At the same time, Russian troops marched along the rivers Pripyat and Western Bug. In 1042, Casimir married the sister of Grand Prince Yaroslav of Kiev, Dobronega (in baptism - Mary), receiving a rich dowry. Kazimir gave 800 prisoners to Yaroslav, whom Boleslav captured in Russia. In 1047, Yaroslav again led the army to help Casimir. Prince Moislav was killed, his army crushed. Mazovia again became part of the Principality of Poland.

The union of Russia and Poland was sealed by another marriage - the son of Yaroslav Izyaslav married Casimir’s sister. Until the death of the great Russian prince Yaroslav in 1054, good relations with Poland remained. Thus, only the support of Russia allowed Poland to return Mazovia to the principality.

Less successful was the policy of Casimir in Pomorie, where the nobility was oriented toward the Czech Republic. In addition, the Second Reich pursued such a policy in order to preserve the balance of power between Poland and the Czech Republic, fearing the excessive strengthening of one of the powers. Every success of Poland inevitably irritated the German Empire. In 1050, there was even a threat of the campaign of Emperor Henry III, against the "rebellious Casimir." As a result, the position of Germany, however, did not allow the return of Pomerania to Prince Casimir. Only East Pomerania recognized the power of Poland, and West Pomerania retained autonomy. There, the rules of their own dynasty, which outwardly recognized vassal dependence on Poland, but was independent in its policy. In 1054, the Silesia was returned to the Polish state at the cost of paying a tribute to the Czech Republic.

Thus, Poland restored unity. However, the royal power of Casimir could not be restored. This task was inherited by his son, Boleslav II the Bold.

How Yaroslav the Wise helped restore Poland

Casimir I the Restorer
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    14 September 2017 06: 39
    "In addition, the Second Reich pursued such a policy as to maintain a balance of power between Poland and the Czech Republic, fearing the excessive strengthening of one of the powers." “The first Reich.” The second went only in 1871.
    1. +5
      14 September 2017 07: 59
      Quote: Prometheus
      The first Reich is the same. The second has gone since 1871 only.

      This is Samsonov! If some historical facts imprudently dare to contradict his harmonious and graceful theories, then the facts themselves are to blame ...
      962 — 1806 The First Reich - The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation
      1871 — 1918 Second Reich - Kaiser Germany
      1933 — 1945 Third Reich
      1. 0
        14 September 2017 11: 44
        About the second Reich.
        If we take the German Reichs, then yes: the ancient Holy Roman Empire German nation - This is the first Reich, not the second. The hitch is that the Holy Roman Empire German nation appeared much later than the historical period under consideration. Then there was another state, which Samsonov called correctly: the Holy Roman Empire. And francs ruled in it. And among the Frankish empires, it was the second. The first is Charlemagne. So Samsonov’s terms are fine.
        1. +3
          14 September 2017 11: 59
          Quote: Nikolay S.
          About the second Reich.
          If we take the German Reichs, then yes: the ancient Holy Roman Empire German nation - This is the first Reich, not the second. The hitch is that the Holy Roman Empire German nation appeared much later than the historical period under consideration. Then there was another state, which Samsonov called correctly: the Holy Roman Empire. And francs ruled in it. And among the Frankish empires, it was the second. The first is Charlemagne. So Samsonov’s terms are fine.

          Not everything is alright with him. The fact is that the term "Second Reich" generally appeared in the 1920's and always meant a very specific period. Therefore, the application of this term to any other period is simply incorrect.
          It should also be noted that the inhabitants of the second Reich certainly knew that they were inhabitants of the Reich (since the word "Reich" translates as "empire"), but would be very surprised if they knew that they were living in the Second Reich.
          The inhabitants of Kievan Rus would have been surprised about the same if they had heard about Kievan Rus.
          1. +1
            14 September 2017 15: 14
            In my opinion, I clearly wrote that the German Reich in that period did not exist at all, neither the first nor the second. This is not true:
            Quote: Mik13
            962 — 1806 The First Reich - The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation

            The Germans write their story like this: "Otto the Great (1–936). Otto took the title" Emperor the Romans and Franks "- the Holy Roman Empire of the German nation was founded." And this is not at all true.
            Strictly speaking, the "Sacred" in the name appeared only under Frederick Barbarossa, i.e. much later, including the period under review. And this empire included many European nations. And those peoples understood their empire as the Roman Empire, as a continuation of that ancient Roman Empire, and not any German one. Only when all of them, except for a part of the Germans, fell off from the SRI, in 1512 Maximilian I began to call the SRI the Holy Roman Empire German nation. And we must keep in mind that that empire was built very differently, not like the later ones, like the Russian or German Kaiser.
            Franks - who are they? Franks participated in the ethnogenesis of both Germans and French. The Salic dialect (the main prevalence) of the Frankish language has switched to Old Dutch. West German language subgroup. Are the Dutch Germans?
            Then we declare all sorts of Lithuanian, Polish, Czech and other Slavic stories the history of Russia. And what? We have a precedent.
            Freshly invented Ukrainians immediately began that way. Well, those, at least you can understand - they have no history at all. And the Golden Horde is called the Russian state, not the Mongolian, based on this logic, we have even more reasons.
            In my opinion, the Germans can lead their Reich only from 1512.
            1. +1
              14 September 2017 16: 06
              Quote: Nikolai S.
              Then we declare all sorts of Lithuanian, Polish, Czech and other Slavic stories the history of Russia. And what? We have a precedent.
              .. And the Golden Horde is called the Russian state, not the Mongolian, based on this logic, we have even more reasons.

              There is such casuistry with this occupational linguistics that we generally have every right to speak our native Russian language. In particular: why do we use foreign foreign names, such as, for example, "Germany", they never call themselves so and speak their own way, now "Deutschdand", in the Romance languages ​​use the term Alemania, and we should use the ancient term "Russia Varyagov "or a similar type of Russia-Porussia, etc. By the way, what kind of curve is the term “Europe” - after all, it is not Russian-speaking, it is easier to use the old name “Western Russia”, or “Venya” there — these names are clearly Russian-speaking. And the "Golden Horde" should also be called in Russian "Mogul Russia", and not some mythical, freshly invented "Mongols", the term "mogul" is more than 3 thousand years old, not like the term "Mongol", which is no more 200 years old. If we ourselves do not seek to respect our native Russian language, then we also do not need to demand respect for our language and people from other peoples.
        2. 0
          14 September 2017 12: 09
          But Samsonov lacks another.
          In my opinion, he identifies Germany and SRI, writes "German Empire", "German Emperor". But Germany then is a kingdom included in the SRI. Emperors of SRI Conrad II, Henry III - emperors from the Salic (Franconian) dynasty.
          But to note such jambs after Samsonov - you will be tormented by writing.
        3. +2
          14 September 2017 13: 15
          "The Holy Roman Empire. And the Franks ruled in it" ////
          ------
          The first was the Frankish Empire. From the 5th to the 9th century. It was called by the Germans Ancient Reich. And in it - in the Frankish Empire (in the Ancient Reich) - the Franks ruled.
          And then the Holy Roman Empire appeared. From the 10th to the 19th century.
          And her Germans called the 1st Reich
          an idea of ​​the three Reichs in the history of Germany:
          Holy Roman Empire First Reich (German: Altes Reich - "Ancient Reich")
          Holy Roman Empire of the German nation (962-1806)
          German Empire Second Reich (German: Zweites Reich) - Kaiser Germany (1871-1918)
          1. +1
            14 September 2017 16: 41
            Quote: voyaka uh
            The first was the Frankish Empire. From the 5th to the 9th century. It was called by the Germans Ancient Reich. And in it - in the Frankish Empire (in the Ancient Reich) - the Franks ruled.
            .. The Holy Roman Empire of the German nation (962-1806)

            This is what it turns out, in the 962th year there were already some "Germans" and the term "Reich" existed, maybe then German already appeared at that time. Is there any evidence to that, and why, for what purpose, to distribute these glitches? "Holy Roman Empire First Reich (German: Altes Reich - "Ancient Reich")"- and then what was the German language really? According to my data, the founder of Protestantism Martin Luther created the German language only in the XNUMXth century with the aim of fighting the Latin-speaking Catholic Rome, and at the same time fighting the local Russian-speaking Vedic beliefs, for example, with druids, etc. As for the "German nation" - the term curve is impossible until it is useful to understand the concept of "German" - where it came from and what it can mean. As a hint, I give the terms "duke" = leader of the squad and " r (x) er general "=" general military commander "- it seems that all these terms do not speak about the ethnic origin of these people, but about their military occupation (business). In the future, they managed to pull this term as a kind of ethnos, which is fundamentally not True, it turns out that ordinary Russian people (Rus) were called either “not smart” (who lost their native Russian language), or even cooler - “Germans.” That's really: “The Lord’s paths are not confessed!”
  2. +1
    14 September 2017 07: 38
    How the title of the article matches the text.
  3. +3
    14 September 2017 12: 22
    Is it really so difficult to get acquainted with the topic before writing an article, at least on Wikipedia. What other magnates in the 11th century. And the second Reich is generally a masterpiece.
  4. +3
    14 September 2017 14: 14
    For information and understanding.
    The total number of dynastic marriages of Russian princes and princesses from the end of the X to the end of the XIII centuries exceeded a hundred Of these, more than 30 were Russian-Polish marriages, in second place in number (more than 15) - Russian-Polovtsian marriages, followed by Russian-Hungarian, Russian-Byzantine and Russian-German - more than 10. It was also concluded several Russian-Georgian Russian-Swedish, Russian-Ossetian, Russian -Bulgarian, Russian-Danish Russian-Lithuanian, Russian-Norwegian marriages and one Russian-English, Russian-French, Russian-Austrian and Russian-Croatian marriages.
  5. 0
    14 September 2017 15: 29
    The image of Casimir I was deduced in the film "Yaroslavna, Queen of France" ... there the Polish actor plays him, forgot his last name, I remember that he starred in the film "Flood", Charnetsky played ...
  6. 0
    14 September 2017 19: 12
    As in Boleslav's sons were bitten and did not shine with their minds, so in French Charlemagne the sons of Zero without a wand.
    Often, great children do not shine with talent. Nowadays, without thinking, Dumas are father and Dumas are son, Raikin and Kostya Raikin (father is more talented), the Dynasty Walter, Mauser, Dragunovs (Kedr submachine gun) Kalashnikovs. Gamzat Zedes and Rasul Gamzatov ..
    The Romanovs had talents: Peter the Great, Nikolai 1- an excellent fortifier, co-author "
  7. +1
    14 September 2017 20: 26
    "Peasants, who secular and spiritual feudal lords quickly turned into slaves (-" working cattle "), rose against the nobility"

    The author of the era did not confuse? The complete transformation of peasants into slaves in Poland happened five centuries later ...
  8. +1
    15 September 2017 13: 05
    the author confused the names, terms, historical epochs, added the title of the article to the topic and gave out his "masterpiece" to the public. Would you be so ashamed of this? This is not a Fomenkovsky site, here serious articles are published wassat