American expert: Washington can't do without Moscow

30
American expert: Washington can't do without MoscowJeffrey Mankoff, a freelancer in the Russia and Eurasia program at the US Center for Strategic and International Studies and a visiting researcher at Columbia University in New York, published an article entitled “What Putin’s Return means to Washington” in the National Interest magazine.

In the article, the expert reflects on the prospects of Russian-American relations after the return of Vladimir Putin to the presidency of the Russian Federation.

The author writes that, despite all disagreements with Moscow, "Washington has the opportunity to maintain good and mutually beneficial relations with Russia."

"To do this, it is necessary to develop a platform that will focus on the mutual interests of the parties and will help bring the relationship out of the impasse related to issues such as missile defense and Russia's domestic policy," Mankoff said.

In his opinion, the preservation and improvement of bilateral cooperation looks particularly relevant against the background of statements by the American President Barack Obama, who promised to withdraw the American military contingent from Afghanistan by 2014.

"Since on the eve of 2014, the United States is accelerating the withdrawal of its troops from Afghanistan, for starters, America and Russia should focus on regional security in Afghanistan and Central Asia," the expert writes.

Mankoff believes that the key moment in the normalization of relations is a change in the American manner of conducting a dialogue with Moscow.

"The harshness of Putin’s election rhetoric should not overshadow the fact that he has long recognized the importance of good relations with the United States and believes that supporting them is in Russia's national interests if Washington is ready to treat Moscow as an equal partner (which he Putin often does not). "

“Against the background of growing instability in the Middle East, the weakening of the European Union and the difficulties of strategic reorientation to the Asian direction, the United States needs productive - in a broad sense - relations with Russia - which in turn means exactly the kind of cooperation Putin offers,” he said. political scientist.

Commenting on the relations between Russia and the United States in a shorter term, the author notes that "Washington and Moscow seriously need to cooperate in Afghanistan and in the neighboring countries of Central Asia." The expert recalled that Russia is among the key partners of the United States in the Northern Distribution Network - the supply route of the international coalition in Afghanistan.

"The timeline (the withdrawal of NATO troops - ed.) Is unlikely to be reviewed by the Obama administration, but it should begin an intensive dialogue with the Russians about regional security during and after leaving. The United States is also interested in Central Asia not becoming a source of radicalism and instability, however, after leaving Afghanistan, they will have less opportunity to influence events, which is why Washington needs to work out a regional security concept after 2014 with Moscow. Central Asia’s security may allow the parties to move away from counterproductive conflicts over missile defense or the problems of the Middle East, which have occupied a key place in relations between Russia and the United States for too long, ”Mankoff believes.

According to the author, the American leadership should have no illusions about cooperation with Russia under Vladimir Putin, because "interaction with it will not be based on common values, but on the pursuit of common interests in the areas in which they exist."

In conclusion, Jeffrey Mankoff notes that "the United States will have to work with the Russian government, which is, and not with the one that America would like."
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. negabaritnyy
    +20
    16 March 2012 11: 09
    I liked it most of all.
    “Against the background of growing instability in the Middle East, the weakening of the European Union and the difficulties of strategic reorientation to the Asian direction, the United States needs productive - in a broad sense - relations with Russia - which in turn means exactly the kind of cooperation Putin offers,” he said. political scientist.

    So this is all their doing.
    1. +14
      16 March 2012 11: 21
      Quote: negabaritnyy
      So this is all their doing.

      If only that was the case. There is a clear tendency here, aimed at not just taking root, but becoming a key player on the Asian continent, in this case with the help of Russia, under a plausible pretext. Well, if we correlate all this with "flirting" with India, relations with China, etc. , then the mosaic is complete. What kind of stability will come of this .... There is no need to talk for a long time, it is better to go clean and lubricate the weapon.
    2. +23
      16 March 2012 11: 24
      And I like all this "sweet" song! laughing It testifies to the fact that, no matter how much you would like to, they are forced to conduct a dialogue with Russia! And they have to make a friendly face and sing beautifully ... But, too often, behind all these shura-muras there was a desire to grab Russia on the back of the head so that it would fall into a coma. The largest and most painful bone in their throat is Putin. And now there will be a constant double activity - conciliatory gestures on the one hand and subversive (without choice of means) on the other. They will sprinkle from all sides. Here is one example of how they try to "keep out!" into the power of "Vlad's friend" ----------- Open letter to Dmitry Medvedev.
      Dear Dima. A quiet and shy intellectual Lev Sharansky with Brighton Beach writes to you. Freedom is better than lack of freedom by having freedom. And you are well aware of this. Recently, rigged elections were held in this country. The KGB achieved the return of a tyrant with massive stuffing and carousels. Any honest and decent person, a gay man and a democratic journalist was completely overwhelmed.

      Dear Dima. The conscientious intelligentsia is well aware of your desire for liberal values ​​and ideals of freedom. You ate a bigmack with the president of Freedom Bastion and got an iPhone from the hands of Steve Jobs himself. Your repentance for Katyn and the organization of the De-Stalinization Council are worthy of respect. And in this difficult hour, the eyes of the whole civilized world are riveted to you. Two months remain before the inauguration of the dictator. All human rights defenders, dissidents and handshake opposition members pray you to take the following actions for the benefit of the child’s tear and human rights:

      1. Arrest Putin.
      2. Disband the KGB.
      3. Disband Surkovian propaganda.
      4. Release Khodorkovsky.
      5. Transfer all power to the Constituent Assembly.
      6. Organize mass lustration against PZhiV.
      7. By arbitrary decision to disband the Strategic Missile Forces.

      These actions will clear your reputation tarnished by working with a tyrant. Because you need to live not according to a lie. For your and our freedom. After all, only steadily increasing the degree of intensity of the fight against the crimes of Stalinism, we will increase the level of handshake in this country. I hope for your prudence. Putin must have hit you. And more than once. It's time to take revenge. Mentally I'm with you. So win.

      Sincerely, Leo Sharansky.

      ------- fool I especially like the words about the "conscientious intelligentsia" ... These are representatives of this intelligentsia who dragged billions from the country, hatched plans to strike at Syria and Iran, doomed the Libyan people to the atrocities of Islamists and beat their throats at rallies in Russia. It must be said that this intelligentsia does not have attractive faces ... In general, such an impression is either Mr. Sharansky is an idiot, or he wants to present us as such. I especially like his "constructive thought" about the Strategic Missile Forces. Prepare, guys, the keys to the apartment where the money is! fool
      1. Paratov
        +11
        16 March 2012 13: 00
        Point 8 is missing from the list - Take potassium cyanide for everyone! ..
      2. +5
        16 March 2012 14: 05
        .
        Quote: esaul
        In general, such an impression either Mr. Sharansky is a fool, or he wants to expose us as such.

        Not entirely true, he absolutely sincerely THINKS that we are.
        Well, if the adversary has such a level of thinking, Yesaul. We can only rejoice.
        1. +7
          16 March 2012 14: 53
          Andrey, welcome! Apparently, you are right, buddy, a finished one can write this. Following his logic, we need to hang the minke whale on the Kremlin, and instead of the word "RUSSIA", take into use the state of Russia. Sharansky went completely off the rails ...
          1. +5
            16 March 2012 15: 01
            Dear Esaul, Sharansky is a brilliant banter over liberals, the main method of which is hyperbole and grotesque. At the same time, Lev Natanovich generated many memes, many of which became common nouns.
            And do not continue to allow profanity wink
            Sincerely.
      3. +4
        16 March 2012 15: 04
        - Is 'Partizan Ivanov' at home?
        - No.
        - Pass the GESTAPO came very swearing.
      4. NKVD
        0
        18 March 2012 09: 16
        Is that a joke? Or banter?
  2. Tugarin snake
    +15
    16 March 2012 11: 41
    Jeffrey Mankoff said nothing new ...
    Only now, the Kremlin will no longer forget how the US intervened in Russia's internal affairs in the presidential election.
    1. +4
      16 March 2012 21: 20
      We still would not forget Mr. Gorbachev, the whole vile "Helsinki" group, the civil war in the Caucasus and its sponsors, laws on PSA, the predatory privatization of everything and everyone, including the biochemical and nuclear complex, corrupt leaders of Almaz-Antey "and" MIG Corporation ", and many more dubious individuals who received money from abroad.
  3. rnb1983
    +11
    16 March 2012 11: 41
    In conclusion, Jeffrey Mankoff notes that "the United States will have to work with the Russian government, which is, and not with the one that America would like."


    That said it right ....
  4. +9
    16 March 2012 11: 46
    Quote: esaul
    The biggest and most painful bone in their throat is Putin. And now there will be constant double activity - conciliatory gestures on the one hand and disruptive (without choice of means) - on the other.

    As always, you are right Esaul! It immediately reminded me of the times of Gorbachev. We naively believed the states, there was peace-friendship-bubblegum everywhere, and then complete and we "lost the cold war." You can't believe them for a penny, we'll fall again
    1. +4
      16 March 2012 13: 33
      Magadan,
      Hi buddy and thanks! Glad to hear from "sunny Magadan"! Thank God, this lesson for our people went, apparently, for the future, remembered for a long time and in no case should we forget it!
  5. ocopnik
    +10
    16 March 2012 12: 03
    Here are the virtuosos! They want to shift the focus to anything, if only Russia has forgotten about missile defense! These hypocrites cannot be trusted for a penny!
  6. +6
    16 March 2012 12: 06
    Aha! Here are the trolls with minuses, it's not scary. And there are no counterarguments - it's already good, so there is nothing to "cover" with.
    1. +7
      16 March 2012 12: 24
      Ziksura,
      Nothing, there are more of us, I have tried ear
  7. +7
    16 March 2012 12: 07
    Jeffrey Mankoff notes that "the United States will have to work with the Russian government it has, not the one that America likes."
    Oh, how I like these words, the "dear allies" pressed, the voices of "sensible" experts are increasingly heard. These sweet speeches should not deceive anyone, having done it in Afghanistan, and at the same time spitting with Pakistan and Iran, the Americans are in a hurry to take their feet out of Afghanistan understand that without Russia they will not succeed. We must, of course, help them get out of there, but nothing more. We do not have any "common interests" with them - they have our own, and we have our own interest. Goose, pig not a comrade, so we will fly, and you yourself will be picking in your dung there yourself
  8. +10
    16 March 2012 12: 09
    There are no "mutual interests" for Washington. You can either speak to him from a position of strength, or not speak at all. Everything else is fraught.
    1. +4
      16 March 2012 14: 01
      Hippopotamus,
      That's right! A very reasonable and correct position! If you believe the flag on the nickname, then it pleases many times! Plus!
  9. PatriotizTAT
    +3
    16 March 2012 13: 02
    Yes, carry the missile defense system in Europe, then the Russian people will believe you, but for now we’ve gone. Give it to your citizens ... your friends were found))!
    1. +3
      16 March 2012 14: 07
      PatriotizTAT,
      Even if they destroy all their missile defense, I still will not believe them!
      It will only mean that somewhere they have another muck against Russia prepared!
  10. +3
    16 March 2012 13: 29
    "... Dear Dima. A quiet and shy intellectual Lev Sharansky from Brighton Beach is writing to you ..."
    Truly, the intelligentsia, especially this one - quiet, shy and, partially, homosexual, is called the shit of the nation.
  11. SAMEDOV SULEYMAN
    +2
    16 March 2012 14: 00
    In conclusion, Jeffrey Mankoff notes that "the United States will have to work with the Russian government that is, and not with the one that America likes." HAS IT REALLY COME TO THEM ?!
  12. +6
    16 March 2012 14: 03
    "interaction with it will be based not on common values, but on the pursuit of common interests in the areas in which they exist."


    I wonder what common interests they have with us, can someone from the "defenders of American democracy" explain popularly?
    You are to blame for the fact that I want to eat. ”- this is their interest. Just remember that Russia is not a lamb and America is far from a wolf. And with the Russian Bear, jokes are bad, no matter how lazy and harmless he may seem. Therefore, they started talking about "common" interests, suddenly Russian simpletons will take the bait. As they say, do not dig a hole for another, you yourself will fall into it
  13. +4
    16 March 2012 17: 34
    "With what pleasure I would have outweighed all the politicians if it had not been for a political action" - Great Nguyen.
  14. wolverine7778
    0
    16 March 2012 19: 32
    Yeah, Obama knows that if Putin does not support him, not to see him for a second term as his own ears and will go into political oblivion forever, Putin also knows that Obama shouldn’t be thrown to American voters now and not only Romney will come or worse - any other hawk and will turn the whole world upside down wink
  15. Oleg0705
    0
    16 March 2012 20: 25
    American expert: Washington can't do without Moscow




    "Pz and Emelya, your week!"
  16. Oleg0705
    0
    16 March 2012 20: 29
    American expert: Washington can't do without Moscow




    "Pz and Emelya, your week!"
  17. +5
    16 March 2012 20: 46
    Mankoff believes that the key moment in the normalization of relations is a change in the American manner of conducting a dialogue with Moscow.
    The harshness of Putin's campaign rhetoric should not obscure the fact that he has long recognized the importance of good relations with the United States and believes that it is in Russia's national interest to maintain them if Washington is willing to treat Moscow as an equal partner (which, according to Putin, , often does not) ".

    The State Department has invested so much money in creating (in the minds of US residents) the image of an enemy from Russia, that speaking about serious trust at the highest level is practically impossible. but there is only one remark:
    How can one speak on equal terms with a vassal ???
  18. +2
    16 March 2012 21: 32
    Why are they sweetly singing like that ... apparently they want to steal something ...
  19. 755962
    +2
    17 March 2012 00: 48
    "The United States will have to work with the Russian government it has, not the one that America likes."
    Hypocrites !!!!!!!!! And what about this !!!!!!
    The administration of US President Barack Obama intends to get Congress to release part of the frozen funds. We are talking about 50 million dollars, for which they have already found application - the amount should be directed to human rights organizations operating in Russia so that the opposition has the means to build democracy.
  20. -2
    17 March 2012 01: 30
    Something I did not understand two articles with the same meaning:
    "American expert: Washington cannot do without Moscow"
    and "What Does Putin's Return Mean for Washington."
    I repeat - both articles are utter nonsense! I don’t even want to discuss!
  21. LiRoy
    0
    18 March 2012 22: 24
    American expert: Washington can not do without Moscow.
    Of course you can’t get by, we have been an image of the enemy for the West for 1000 years.