Lavrov told about the shame of the European Union

88
Lavrov told about the shame of the European UnionRussian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, speaking at the “government hour,” assured State Duma deputies that the country's foreign policy under the new president would maintain continuity. The minister complained about the double standards of the European Union and supported the idea of ​​discussing the observance of human rights in Europe itself, and called the "Magnitsky list" just PR. The Foreign Minister described Saakashvili’s policy as an unbalanced person’s actions, and Bashar al-Assad criticized for his sluggishness and promised not to send Russian soldiers to Syria.

Lavrov recalled that the current foreign policy concept, which President Dmitry Medvedev adopted in 2008, was the successor to the concept of 2000, which was formed under Vladimir Putin. However, changes in the international situation require some adjustment. Thus, in connection with the events in the Middle East, the Foreign Ministry will pay special attention to the rule of law in the international arena. According to Lavrov, international partners often point to non-observance of rights in a particular country, but they are not always as scrupulous about their own actions.

Speaking about the general principles of foreign policy, Lavrov stressed that it will be based on equal cooperation and mutual respect. "We will not obscure existing differences, but we are not going to dramatize them," he said. At the same time, the Foreign Minister noted that the strategic policy of Russia, which is not subject to "opportunistic shyness", is attracting more and more supporters in the international arena.

One example of double standards that, according to Lavrov, international partners apply, is “statelessness” in the Baltic countries. "This is a shame of the European Union, because we do not demand anything except what is required by international organizations - the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, the OSCE, the Council of Europe - they all formulated specific wishes for both Latvia and Estonia" - noted the Minister. The European Union accepted Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania into its ranks, although they did not pass the criteria for membership. In particular, in relation to them, claims were voiced relating to the observance of human rights, ensuring the rights of national linguistic minorities, Lavrov recalled.

Lavrov also supported the idea to hold a hearing in the State Duma on human rights in the European Union. The first state-of-the-art report on this issue in several countries of the world was first published by the Russian Foreign Ministry at the end of last year. According to the minister, the human rights field is not a “taboo topic”, and it should be discussed in a respectful manner.

On the "lists of Magnitsky" Lavrov expressed skepticism. He considers drawing up a list of Russian officials who are banned from entering a number of Western countries because of their involvement in this case, as a PR. "Under international law, any country can refuse to issue a visa to any person from any other state without explaining the reasons. Therefore, all this, by and large, is pure PR, to show how cool we are: here we make lists, we will not allow anyone" - said the Minister in the State Duma. In his opinion, it is not lawful to punish people until their guilt is proved by a court. “We ourselves must deal with our affairs, and interference of this kind, of course, creates serious problems in our relations with our partners,” the Russian Foreign Minister added.

The head of the foreign affairs agency touched upon the topic of adoption of Russian children. According to him, the relevant agreement with the United States has already been sent to the State Duma for ratification. "The agreement with Italy has already entered into force ... the agreement with France is in the government and, I think, during March it will also be transferred to the State Duma for consideration," Lavrov said. Negotiations on this subject are also underway with Spain, Israel, Ireland, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand.

The minister again criticized the policy of the head of Georgia, Mikhail Saakashvili. According to him, Russia does not persuade anyone to recognize Abkhazia and South Ossetia. When some countries take this step, Moscow will only learn about such arrangements after the fact. According to the Foreign Minister, an increase in the number of states that recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia will not keep Saakashvili from new military adventures. "About the fact that the number of confessions will somehow influence the inflamed brain of the President of Georgia and hold back from the start of the new adventure, this is absolutely not the case. When he started the last war, he attacked Russian peacekeepers who were protected by an international agreement signed Georgia. Even this did not stop him. Therefore, we need to be prepared here for the fact that a person is unbalanced, "Lavrov said.

Syrian leader Bashar Assad has also been criticized by the Russian Foreign Ministry. “Unfortunately, not all of our councils and far from always timely found some practical reflection in his actions,” the Foreign Minister noted, answering the questions of deputies. So, many "useful laws" were adopted by the Syrian authorities with great delay. "With delay, proposals are being made to start a dialogue, meanwhile an armed confrontation acquires its own dynamics, and this inertia can capture and absorb everyone," Lavrov added.

The minister also stressed that, in his opinion, the Russian military should not participate in the hostilities in Syria. “I think that this will contradict the fundamental interests of the Russian Federation,” he noted.
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    15 March 2012 12: 19
    He put a plus with a creak ... The position of Russia is clear, but I did not see the prospects for the development of this position ...
    1. +16
      15 March 2012 12: 36
      And I really liked it
      ... to the inflamed brain of the Georgian president ...
      Well attached! Already for this one +! wassat
      1. +3
        16 March 2012 00: 43
        The minister also stressed that, in his opinion, the Russian military should not participate in the hostilities in Syria. “I think that this will contradict the fundamental interests of the Russian Federation,” he noted.


        Well, really, the Minister of Foreign Affairs cannot say otherwise. It is not necessary to send an army, but specialists ... and of course UNOFFICIALLY.
    2. jar0512rus
      +8
      15 March 2012 12: 39
      I agree!!! The position has been voiced, but at the same time there is little specificity, everything is somehow about everything and at the same time nothing !!! Everything in the future tense !!! Where is the tough leadership position, where are the promised actions !!! And lately, some incomprehensible softening of rhetoric regarding the West has been noticeable !!! It bothers !!!
      1. Cripple cross
        +12
        15 March 2012 13: 10
        Quote: jar0512rus
        everything is somehow about everything and at the same time about anything !!!

        This alignment suggests that you have a REAL POLICY! smile
        1. jar0512rus
          +8
          15 March 2012 13: 28
          Yes, I do not argue !!! Lavrov is a very competent politician and smart person !!! A good politician should say so !!! I’m talking about the position of the state and foreign policy which it does not determine and which is not quite intelligible especially against the background of loud statements !!!
        2. +4
          15 March 2012 21: 44
          CripplCross golden words.
          It is enough to look at the unbalanced (this for all her rear in the form of an incomplete army, Fed, etc.) Mrs. Clinton.
      2. -1
        15 March 2012 13: 48
        Quote: jar0512rus
        Where is the tough leadership position, where are the promised actions !!!

        What should be the tough position about, and what kind of actions? Regarding Syria, Russia already has a rather unambiguous and consistent position.
        1. jar0512rus
          0
          15 March 2012 14: 08
          Well, for example, in dialogue with NATO, with the Americans, with the Baltic countries !!! Why do we allow provocative attacks against us, after which we also conduct a dialogue about the transit of their goods through the base in Ulyanovsk !!! And as for Syria, the position yes agrees unequivocal and consistent, but only at the stage of vetoing !!! And what will happen next !!! It’s not worth making a guess !!!
          1. welder
            0
            15 March 2012 15: 25
            jar0512rus listen old man ...... you come on without hysteria and without provocation please
            1. jar0512rus
              0
              15 March 2012 15: 38
              welder I am far from provocations, and even more so hysteria !!! I have a certain view on the policies of the above countries and certain questions on the merits !!! And maybe I am wrong about something, but there is a discussion about this !!! And if you can give me any explanations about these countries and their actions, I will only be glad to read !!! "old man"
              1. welder
                0
                15 March 2012 16: 03
                just ..... the dog barks, the caravan goes .... or wise understands stupid that he is just stupid

                I forgot to add .... I'm talking about Russian diplomacy ... why should we pay attention to Mosek
          2. -2
            15 March 2012 15: 50
            Quote: jar0512rus
            Why do we allow provocative attacks against us,

            What does "allow" mean? They make their stupid statements. The Foreign Ministry answers them. This is "diplomacy". How can they not be allowed to say something?
            Quote: jar0512rus
            and we are conducting a dialogue on the transit through the base in Ulyanovsk of their goods !!!

            Well, firstly, with this base, not everything is clear. And secondly, there is so much noise, as if there will be a military base with extraterritoriality. there will only (if of course) be a transshipment base for the removal of the assets of the Coalition forces from Afghanistan, where they are curtailing their operation. Transportation of property I note will be made on a fee basis. But most likely all the same, the main path will be through Pakistan.
          3. Atlon
            +1
            15 March 2012 16: 19
            Quote: jar0512rus
            Well, for example, in dialogue with NATO, with the Americans, with the Baltic countries !!! Why do we allow provocative attacks against us, after which we also conduct a dialogue about the transit of their goods through the base in Ulyanovsk !!! And as for Syria, the position yes agrees unequivocal and consistent, but only at the stage of vetoing !!! And what will happen next !!! It’s not worth making a guess !!!

            The politician will not work out of you ... Too many exclamation points. wink Politics, more to the face of ellipsis. In the arrangement of many, Lavrov just succeeded ... winked
            As for the "base" in Ulyanovsk, this is not a base by and large ... However, it is a good opportunity to study some of the issues of providing Amerov's troops ... Codes friend or foe, interaction of troops, material base, professional training, principles of flight and airfield work, radio communications, dispatching services, security organization, logistics, weak points and much, much more ... And even get money for it. bully
            1. Churchill
              +4
              15 March 2012 21: 15
              This process is mutual; while we will study them, they too will not sit idly by ...
    3. Aleksey67
      +11
      15 March 2012 12: 56
      Well done!!! Russia has acquired a "voice" in world politics, and over time its "volume" has increased. It's just time to stop fighting off attacks and make claims ourselves
      1. Brother Sarych
        +2
        15 March 2012 13: 31
        It seems that you did not particularly carefully read the speech or, at least, this article?
      2. recitatorus
        +3
        15 March 2012 13: 37
        Thank God they at least started to say something! Previously, they justified themselves ...
      3. +3
        15 March 2012 15: 52
        Yeah, beautifully Lavrov is the Jewish Union, oh, the EU is a face-un-table. laughing
        1. +8
          15 March 2012 17: 49
          Quote: domokl
          ... Russia's position is clear, but I did not see the prospects for the development of this position ...

          Domokles, this line denotes a general perspective of the Russian Foreign Ministry's methods of action ----- However, changes in the international situation require some adjustment. So, in connection with the events in the Middle East, the Foreign Ministry will pay special attention to the rule of law in the international arena. ------- And what perspective do you, my friend, want to see in today's world, changing with kaleidoscopic rapidity. The main thing now is to very carefully monitor the international situation and react sensitively and competently to the slightest disturbance on the surface. Our diplomatic corps has not badly cut a chip for itself - having managed to convince the world of the independence and solidity of its position, allowing its line to bend not by hysterical demarches, being like states, but on the basis of "compliance with international law." You can afford this, knowing your strength! ... good And the goal and perspective have one direction - the comprehensive strengthening of Russia's power in the international arena.
          1. Marat
            0
            16 March 2012 19: 46
            Of course, the position of Russia should be weighed - not by hysterical demarches, like the states, but on the basis of "compliance with international law." After all, we did not win the Cold War and the states did not fall apart

            The main thing is that Russia began to defend its (and its allies) interests and pursue an independent policy, and the prospect of reuniting with us and Belarus in a single Union appeared
  2. +10
    15 March 2012 12: 26
    In my opinion, this uncle is the only one of the officials who is in his place.
    I respect
    1. +2
      15 March 2012 12: 37
      Rogozin also does not play toys. Yes, and the president we have now ... a lot of what :)
    2. танк
      +4
      15 March 2012 12: 49
      He is the only one who works and this is visible
      1. recitatorus
        +5
        15 March 2012 13: 40
        This is perhaps the only minister who does not cause disgust!
  3. welder
    0
    15 March 2012 12: 27
    hmm ....... it seems we will gradually abandon Syria?
    1. Svyatoslav
      -1
      15 March 2012 13: 19
      No one will abandon Syria. The maximum will change the head of state, the regime and diplomatic relations will remain the same.
      1. танк
        +1
        15 March 2012 13: 37
        If Assad is overthrown, there will be a puppet US government, so that diplomatic relations will break !!!
        1. Svyatoslav
          +2
          15 March 2012 13: 49
          Not the fact that the Americans will replace the government. Perhaps our government will find someone better. Someone who suits us, and the Chinese, and the Syrian people.
          1. танк
            0
            15 March 2012 15: 02
            If not Americans, then who? the inhabitants of Syria? yes they do not need such a mess in the country
          2. 0
            15 March 2012 15: 45
            Quote: Svyatoslav
            Perhaps our government will find someone better. Someone who suits us, and the Chinese, and the Syrian people.

            Definitely no. Look who came to power as a result of the "Arab Spring" in other countries. Basically, radical Islamists take up.
        2. -1
          15 March 2012 13: 52
          Quote: tank
          there will be a puppet government of the USA, so that diplomatic relations will break !!!

          And what do we have with the USA are not deep. relationship? As well as with all other countries with pro-American foreign policy.
    2. -1
      15 March 2012 13: 51
      And Syria what is our territory, what would refuse or not refuse it? It is not even an ally, nor are there any agreements on mutual assistance, and so on, we and Syria do not. This is an independent subject of international law, with its domestic and foreign policies and its internal problems.
      1. +1
        15 March 2012 15: 03
        Those. do you think you need to give a damn not only about strategic partnership with Syria, but also about hundreds of thousands of Russian citizens living in this country?
        1. +2
          15 March 2012 15: 38
          Quote: DEfindER
          as well as hundreds of thousands of Russian citizens living in this country?

          Reduce the figure by an order of magnitude. Where do "hundreds of thousands of Russian citizens" come from in Syria? And where does the "strategic partnership" come from with Syria? The most common partnership, as with dozens of other countries.
        2. welder
          0
          15 March 2012 15: 41
          DEfinbER - don't distort the facts - this is bad
      2. танк
        0
        15 March 2012 15: 03
        This subject buys millions of weapons from us !!!
        1. -1
          15 March 2012 15: 39
          Quote: tank
          This subject buys millions of weapons from us !!!

          Only Syria buys? Yes, we sell weapons to her, and this is generally profitable. But you should not overestimate cooperation with Syria.
          1. танк
            0
            15 March 2012 17: 42
            You greatly underestimate the full strategic importance of Syria, we have already cut off sales to Iran and the DPRK, and there are not so many buyers of weapons with real money
            1. -1
              15 March 2012 23: 21
              Quote: tank
              sales to Iran and the DPRK have already been cut off to us, and there are not so many buyers of weapons with real money

              Did Russia sell weapons to the DPRK? It seems not. They do it themselves and buy what they don’t do from the Chinese (they have prices lower than ours, as the quality is understandable), and Iran also bought equipment at the same market in China. I don’t know how now in connection with international sanctions. And Iran itself actually has its own defense industry.
      3. welder
        0
        15 March 2012 15: 33
        viking-are you a man or not? just took a step, so go to the end (I'm talking about Russian diplomacy) !!! I didn’t want to offend anything
        1. -1
          15 March 2012 15: 43
          Quote: welder
          viking-are you a man or not? once you took a step, so go to the end

          And you dear, if not a secret how old? Reasoning excuse me at the level of some game, where you can still "save" and in cases of loss, "load" again. What steps do you think Russian diplomacy should take? Please tell us in more detail. That's purely curious. And do not forget who is our main buyer of hydrocarbons, metals, etc. What brings income to the budget.
          1. welder
            0
            15 March 2012 15: 53
            I’m saying that if you stood up for someone and go to the end (I'm not talking about street analysis), but I’m .... 40 soon
            1. +1
              15 March 2012 16: 11
              Quote: welder
              I mean that if you stood up for someone and go to the end

              To enter at the diplomatic level is one thing. Or provide diplomatic support that Russia does.
              What does it mean to "go to the end"? Send your troops? Do we have a zone of vital interests there for which it is worth starting a war? This is a purely rhetorical question, I actually know the answer myself. so that apart from diplomatic support and can supply weapons, if the embargo is not imposed, Russia will not do anything else, which is actually true.
              1. welder
                0
                15 March 2012 16: 20
                listen friend, but I personally am against our soldiers in Syria, but there are other ways
                1. -1
                  15 March 2012 18: 11
                  Quote: welder
                  but there are other ways

                  For instance?
  4. Kazak_30
    +10
    15 March 2012 12: 29
    I like this man! Calm, judicious in one word professional !!!
  5. +3
    15 March 2012 12: 52
    I feel more and more often we will poke them like kittens into our own shit, they oh, how they like it good
  6. 755962
    +2
    15 March 2012 12: 57
    According to Lavrov, international partners often point out non-compliance with rights in a particular country, but they are by no means always so scrupulous in their own actions.
    As a rule, they will see a speck in someone else's eye, but they will not notice logs in their eyes!
  7. orion-sticks
    -12
    15 March 2012 13: 07
    If Lavrov did not behave like a port girl, then such a situation in the Middle East would not exist. In comparison with A. Gromyko he just doesn’t even want to talk.
    1. Aleksey67
      +8
      15 March 2012 13: 10
      Quote: orion-stiks
      If Lavrov did not behave like a port girl, then such a situation in the Middle East would not exist. In comparison with A. Gromyko he just doesn’t even want to talk.


      Before throwing words, it would not hurt to think. Gromyko had the might of the USSR under his belt. Lavrov is a worthy Russian. In contrast to Gromyko, remember the "bedding" of the State Department Kozyrev lol
      1. -10
        15 March 2012 13: 14
        Quote: Aleksey67
        Before throwing words, it would not hurt to think. Gromyko had the might of the USSR under his belt. Lavrov is a worthy Russian. In contrast to Gromyko, remember the "bedding" of the State Department Kozyrev

        That’s for sure, and in our situation it’s only a port girl to pretend to be! What is our country's foreign policy, but no! Merged everything that is possible and everything that is impossible !!!!
        1. Aleksey67
          -2
          15 March 2012 13: 17
          Quote: nycsson
          That’s for sure, and in our situation it’s only a port girl to pretend to be! What is our country's foreign policy, but no! Merged everything that is possible and everything that is impossible !!!!



          nycssonDo not be responsible for all of Russia. You are unpleasant to me on most comments. Let's split up, I do not comment on your comments and ask you to bypass my side drinks
        2. 0
          15 March 2012 13: 53
          Quote: nycsson
          Merged everything that is possible and everything that is impossible !!!!

          Why did you do this? I personally didn’t merge anything. Stop whining in every second message !!!
      2. orion-sticks
        -7
        15 March 2012 14: 39
        Alexei, I agree with the USSR. But I don’t rush, follow his activities as the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in all aggravations with the West. I don’t want to remember Kozyrev and Primakov. Maybe Lavrov is a worthy Russian, but he is not Russian.
        1. Aleksey67
          +4
          15 March 2012 14: 45
          Quote: orion-stiks
          Alexei, I agree with the USSR. But I don’t rush, follow his activities as the head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in all aggravations with the West. I don’t want to remember Kozyrev and Primakov. Maybe Lavrov is a worthy Russian, but he is not Russian.


          Let's rely on the facts. Yes Lavrov worthily defends Russia's position at the Foreign Ministry Yes Clitorsha and her kind are fighting in hysterics, as the time has passed when there was enough call from Fashington wink And as for Primakov, I disagree fundamentally; one of his aircraft turns is worth a lot. Kozyrev I don’t even want to remember the Judas, I can pity Claudia wassat
          1. -2
            15 March 2012 15: 22
            Quote: Aleksey67
            And as for Primakov, I disagree fundamentally; one of his aircraft turns is worth a lot.

            So I didn’t understand something. Do you condemn or, on the contrary, approve of his turn over the Atlantic?
            1. Aleksey67
              +2
              15 March 2012 15: 23
              Quote: Viking
              So I didn’t understand something. Do you condemn or, on the contrary, approve of his turn over the Atlantic?


              I fully approve Yes A real man good
              1. 0
                15 March 2012 15: 31
                Quote: Aleksey67
                I fully approve

                And I'm kind of talking about that. That U-turn generally went down in the history of diplomacy.
          2. Marat
            +2
            16 March 2012 19: 53
            I support Aleksey67 in the opinion of Lavrov! Of course, he cannot repeat Gromyko and cannot knock a shoe on the UN platform with his shoe - this was done by people behind whose back stood our common huge and strong Homeland! Behind Lavrov is only the largest republic - part of a fragmented alliance. In these conditions, it is difficult to do something more than him.

            The first priority now is to reunite in a single country - and the same Lavrov will speak in a completely different way - and his words will have a different weight
        2. dodil
          -1
          16 March 2012 00: 51
          Of course he is not Russian. He is Armenian, not Russian)))) But this does not prevent him from being an excellent Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation !!!
  8. Nickolay3145
    +3
    15 March 2012 13: 20
    You can stupid a lot and for a long time ... But do not dare to compare boiled and fried ... And, most importantly, do not pay attention to nedomerki, who is bad for the USSR ... nycsson won’s actively messing up, sorry for him ... wretched ...
  9. Tugarin snake
    +4
    15 March 2012 13: 22
    The European Union entered the stage of disintegration into a prosperous Europe and into raw materials appendages. We will help them, as they once were to us!
    And Russia needs to ignore the EU and have a conversation directly with the governments of Europe. And emphasize this in every way.
    1. orion-sticks
      -6
      15 March 2012 14: 43
      You’re a plus, but Lavrov doesn’t. Churkin rests more than this slug.
      1. 0
        15 March 2012 15: 23
        Quote: orion-stiks
        but Lavrov does not

        And what do you think Lavrov should do? Tell me. Desirable by points, and not breaking away from reality, relying on the existing reality, so to speak, and not on desire.
        1. Sniper 1968
          0
          15 March 2012 16: 35
          Viking,
          Quote: Viking
          what do you think Lavrov should do

          Our mutual friend (orion-styx) implied that Lavrov was supposed to fill Sarkozy’s face (for starters) and drag old Hillary by the hair ... lol
          1. -1
            15 March 2012 18: 14
            Quote: Sniper 1968
            Our mutual friend (orion-styx) implied that Lavrov was supposed to fill Sarkozy’s face (for starters) and drag old Hillary by the hair ..

            Well, perhaps. recourse
  10. Nickolay3145
    -1
    15 March 2012 13: 23
    Tugarin-zmey, but how can China wait? And let them fight themselves)))
  11. zhidikhanov
    0
    15 March 2012 13: 28
    I’ll say a lot of good things to Lavrov’s account, but not now, but what’s written in the article is great and the volume of the voice rises and the Americans listen to us and take notes for themselves. And about Sahak. I don’t want to talk at all, because what to take from a sick person, eating clothes, brains somewhere hurt and swollen. That's just about Syria as it is sad.
  12. +2
    15 March 2012 13: 28
    I respect this minister very much
  13. zhidikhanov
    -2
    15 March 2012 13: 33
    http://nr2.ru/sevas/374591.html Больной вопрос, это реальная статья или очередная пустая статейка? Прочтите кто-нибудь,что то беспокойно на душе.
    1. -1
      15 March 2012 15: 30
      Quote: zhidikhanov
      or another empty article?

      I think so. The next, "scarecrows" that have stuck in their teeth. The fact that the United States is just waiting to send the entire globe to hell, and China has already drawn maps with its territory to the Urals. Do the Chinese themselves know about this interestingly? What kind of things are they. It seems like adults are smart people, they have been in fairly large positions. And how they resign and contact the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, then they only have to wonder.
      1. zhidikhanov
        +1
        15 March 2012 18: 28
        Thank you, approved my thoughts.
  14. wax
    +5
    15 March 2012 13: 49
    The fundamental interests of Russia meet the world, the fundamental interests of the enemies of Russia are war.
  15. +3
    15 March 2012 14: 17
    Russia needs to exert more pressure now. Since Europe is now weak, there is a catastrophic shortage of money. And then pursue a policy of rapprochement. Only without the USA. Lavrov, in my opinion, is most suitable for this. He can competently poke his nose, in d .... mo. And Europe is already thinking about getting closer to Russia, many ministers of the leading countries of Europe and prominent politicians speak out for this. This is of course smoke on the surface. So inside the hope of rapprochement is already smoldering.
    1. -2
      15 March 2012 15: 26
      Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
      Russia needs to exert more pressure now.

      To whom specifically, how and in what? Let's do it without common phrases.
      Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
      Since Europe is now weak, there is a catastrophic shortage of money.

      Compared to whom and with what is Europe "weak"? Are countries such as Germany, France, Italy and others weak in an economic, military or political sense? Why are they weak?
      1. +5
        15 March 2012 15: 57
        Dear Viking.
        The weaknesses of Europe are muslimism and the population is impoverished, and every year there are more beggars. There are also many cases of racism. this is offhand.
        Politically, the Parties squabble among themselves like dogs. Even worse. Channels in the parties themselves. Unbelieving own secret services. KGB counterparts. Angry at America and Israel. for the fact that they bomb and they have to restore and accept the population (refugees) whom you need to feed, dress, pay for housing. And the cash desks are empty. No money. Prices are rising decently to raise salaries. People work and receive subsidies from the state in order to live. The army is shrinking every day. America draws into new wars. The result is taxes. This is offhand. This applies to all countries in Europe. For example, there is not much time to pick up work sometimes. I read and write in pauses.
        1. -2
          15 March 2012 18: 25
          Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
          Europe's weaknesses are muslimism

          That is yes. There is one. But these are internal weaknesses that have little effect on the quality of tanks and helicopters, as well as on the training of their crews.
          Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
          Politically, the Parties squabble among themselves like dogs.

          Where are they not biting? Now in Russia there will be something around 800 parties, as they say, after the party can consist of 500 people.
          Quote: Heinrich Ruppert
          Angry at America and Israel. for the fact that they bomb and they have to restore

          Is this where "they" stop something? In the Middle East? Well, except that the oil companies, so from there and have a profit. And if you remember that in the issue with Libya, Sarkozy just played the first violin.
          1. +3
            15 March 2012 18: 55
            So you need to play on these weaknesses, and jointly, to look for solutions together. Joint programs. People need to win over to their side. And the training is really good only how many are left. Restoring Former Yugoslavia and other new members. America and Israel with their wars cost a frantic amount of money. And in schools, heating was turned off in the winter there was no money for payment. Russia now needs this brand so that we reassure everyone to put pressure. As for the parties, they are split and those who will win more votes for cooperation with Russia. And then everyone will be fine. Enough work and money for everyone.
  16. Sniper 1968
    0
    15 March 2012 14: 23
    Lavrov is great. A man is in his place. He gives a vision of the situation as much as today's realities allow. When the parasites bombed Belgrade, the realities were different, the country was different ... THEY are bombing Syria? They began to reckon with us ... Good luck to everyone.
    1. 0
      15 March 2012 15: 34
      Quote: Sniper 1968
      They began to reckon with us ...

      Well, well, don't overestimate yourself. If Syria were an "easy prize", then no one would stand on ceremony with it, despite the position of Russia. Because even in the event of a military invasion, the only thing Russia can do is to protest at the international level. And that's all. Russia will not get involved in a war or any economic conflict with the leading world powers, since this fundamentally contradicts its interests.
      1. Sniper 1968
        +1
        15 March 2012 16: 10
        Viking,
        Do you think that we are cardboard? And interests ... The base in Tartus, at least ... And China plays for us in this particular matter ... Braking factors are evident. Respectfully.
        1. -1
          15 March 2012 18: 20
          Quote: Sniper 1968
          You think we're cardboard?

          Well, besides Syria, interests all over the world exist.
          Quote: Sniper 1968
          And interests ... Base in Tartus, at least ...

          Is she vital?
          Quote: Sniper 1968
          And China is playing for us in this particular matter ...

          China presumably does not play for us at all. China is playing for itself. And for their interests. It will be more profitable for him to confront the States on this issue, can he be blamed for what he will do?
          1. Sniper 1968
            0
            15 March 2012 21: 30
            Viking,
            Quote: Viking
            besides Syria, interests all over the world exist.

            Syria cannot be turned in. Although for moral and ethical reasons, not to mention strategic ... The penultimate step to our borders.
            Quote: Viking
            Is she vital?

            This is the only foreign base of the Navy's MTO, the rest successfully crawled into the dashing 90s ...
            Quote: Viking
            China presumably does not play for us at all. China plays for itself

            This is their traditional, "quiet" tactic, I agree. But, in this round, the Chinese boxer works for us. Iran is his sphere of interests. Not only economic, but also geopolitical ... Best regards.
            1. +1
              15 March 2012 23: 16
              Quote: Sniper 1968
              Syria cannot be turned in. Although for moral and ethical reasons, not to mention strategic ... The penultimate step to our borders.

              There is no such thing in politics - moral and ethical considerations. Yes, it is in the interest or not. Maintaining the current regime in Syria is in Russia's interests at the moment - definitely yes! But what price is Russia willing to pay for it? The formula - "we will not stand behind the price" is clearly not suitable here. I think that there can be no question of any kind of military assistance. Yes, this option is not actually considered by anyone seriously. By the way, the regime in Egypt has changed, but has it become pro-American? I don’t think, since radical Islamists (for whom the "overseas demon" is enemy No. 1 by definition) came to power () through elections, and only the traditionally strong influence of the army on the internal life in Egypt is still holding them back.
              1. Sniper 1968
                0
                16 March 2012 00: 09
                Viking,
                I can’t disagree. It’s a pity for the Syrians. And Syria. Just humanly ... Good luck.
  17. Goga
    +2
    15 March 2012 14: 59
    You can be calm behind the Foreign Ministry - an interesting team has picked up, and the Minister voiced interesting undertakings, we will wait - there will be something to read.
  18. dred
    -2
    15 March 2012 15: 50
    Well, the European Union has been drowning for a long time.
  19. PatriotizTAT
    0
    15 March 2012 17: 44
    And what about our missile defense, he didn’t hint at anything ?! When are we going to beat the enemies with "hurricanes" ?!
  20. +2
    15 March 2012 19: 37
    Finally, the process began, albeit with a creak.
    Regarding China, they will now do everything to quarrel us, so we must be careful about such information.
  21. Oleg0705
    +3
    15 March 2012 20: 10
    Sergey Viktorovich Lavrov - statesman.
  22. 0
    15 March 2012 23: 14
    The recipe you take a tie .... Soak in mayonnaise, sprinkle with grated cheese and drink young wine ... lick your fingers ...
  23. Comrade
    +2
    15 March 2012 23: 40
    Lavrov well done! Pah pah pah so as not to jinx it.